Skip to main content

Provisional Order Bills

Volume 35: debated on Thursday 4 July 1895

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Electric Lighting Provisional Orders (No 4) Bill

Copy ordered, "Of Memorandum stating the nature of the proposals contained in the Provisional Orders included in the Electric Lighting Provisional Orders (No. 4) Bill."—( Mr. Hanbury)

Copy presented accordingly; to lie upon the Table, and to be printed. [No. 382.]

Tramways Provisional Orders (No 2) Bill Hl

Reported, with Amendments [Provisional Orders confirmed]; Report to lie upon the Table, and to be printed.

Bill, as amended, considered; read the third time, and passed, with Amendments.

Water Orders Confirmation Bill Hl

Reported, without Amendment [Provisional Orders confirmed]; read the third time, and passed.

Local Government Provisional Order (No 10) Liverpool Bill

Reported, with Amendments [Provisional Order confirmed].

Report to lie upon the Table.

Bill, as amended, to be considered To-morrow.

Local Government Provisional Order (No 16) Southampton Bill

Reported with Amendments [Provisional Order confirmed].

Report to lie upon the Table.

Bill, as amended, to be considered To-morrow.

Local Government Provisional Order (No 7) Bristol Bill

Reported, with Amendments [Provisional Order confirmed].

Report to lie upon the Table.

Bill, as amended, to be considered To-morrow.

London Water (Transfer) Bills

Ordered, That the Minutes of Evidence, together with an Appendix, taken before the Select Committee on the London Water (Transfer) Bill, be laid upon the Table of the House, and be printed.—( Mr. Plunket.)—[No. 384.]

North British Railway Bill

said, that he desired to make a statement with regard to this Bill. Some days ago he had intimated his intention to oppose the measure in the interests of his constituents, but the discussion had then been adjourned in view of the peculiar circumstances under which the House had met. The Bill would be again brought forward Tomorrow, but as the result of an agreement that had been entered into between the parties interested his opposition to the measure would be withdrawn. The principal point in dispute was with regard to the regulation of the train service from Kirkcaldy, and as the railway company had now given an undertaking that permission should be given to passengers to travel by a particular train he should not further oppose the Bill.

Public Expenditure

on behalf of of Sir J. CARMICHAEL, moved for a Return Public Expenditure (Exchequer Issues), on Taxes, for each year 1857–;8 to 1894–5 Charges (in continuation of Parliamentary Paper, No. 255, of Session 1894).