asked the Secretary of State for War whether any reply has been given to a request for an alteration of paragraph 21, Regulations for Civilian subordinates, Army Clothing Department, that was sent to the War Office in February, 1912; and, if so, will he state the nature of the reply?

The request was found to involve points of detail which have taken some time to investigate, but a reply will be sent shortly.

asked whether the petition presented in 1911 by the crews of the Naval Ordnance vessels has yet been considered; and, if so, what decision, if any, has been arrived at?

The question is under the consideration of the Admiralty.

asked the Secretary of State for War whether his attention has been called to a book just published, with the permission of the War Office, in which it is stated that our military affairs are at present in a deplorable state and that no recruit under twenty would be of any fighting value; and what steps he proposes to take to remedy the present insufficiency of our military forces?

I need hardly say that the book referred to has no official sanction, seeing that it contains a severe indictment of the conduct of our military affairs by successive Governments for the past eighty years and a scathing condemnation of our present naval policy.

What is the name of the book?

I do not know that the hon. Gentleman would like to read the book. I cannot remember the name of its title, but I have a copy.

Could the right hon. Gentleman say how it is that the War Office, of which he is the head, gave direct permission for the publication of this book which contains far more than Lord Roberts has ever said, and yet they denounce Lord Roberts' scheme?

Did the War Office not give the permission because they thought the book could do no harm?

I could not answer that without further reference to this work. With regard to the point raised by the hon. Member (Mr. Hunt) there were grave irregularities, so I am informed, but they affected far more the Admiralty than the War Office. Of course, the particular statements referred to ought not to have been uttered, as I have already stated, but proper action will probably be taken by the Admiralty, and any further questions should be addressed to them.

Can the right hon. Gentleman say why direct permission was given in the book by the War Office if they did not approve of it?

I have indicated—of course direct permission to make criticisms of such a kind would never conceivably be given—that any question as to further action to be taken should be addressed to the Admiralty, which, the hon. Member will see if he reads the book, is far more directly concerned than the War Office.

The hon. Member has carried it far enough for one day.

asked whether, in view of the fact that numbers of the National Reserve are to be mobilised with the Territorials in order to make up the deficiency in their numbers in case of sudden invasion, these men of the National Reserve will have had any reasonable amount of practice with the rifles provided for them; and whether they will ever have been drilled with the Territorials with whom they are to be mobilised?

As regards musketry, increased Grants are to be made to county associations in order that further facilities may be given to National Reservists to obtain rifle practice. In cases where the National Reservists has previously served in units of the Territorial Force and the corresponding forces which preceded them he will often have been drilled with the unit which he joins on mobilisation.

asked how many men there now are in the Territorial Force who passed their full musketry course up to 600 yards with the service rifle, and who also attended camp for fifteen days last year?

There are no statistics available at the War Office to enable me to give the required information.

Are we to understand that the right hon. Gentleman does not know whether these men are trained, or whether they can shoot or not?

No, sir, I am most anxious to give the hon. Gentleman full information, but he will see that if he puts down a question on certain matters it may involve immense labour, as it would do in this case, and that it would take months to prepare the answer.

asked what was the number of officers (by rank) on the Active List of the Regular Army, and the number of officers not upon the Active List who would be required for the complete mobilisation of the Expeditionary Force; and, in stating the number of the latter, what was the number of each rank which would be taken from each of the different sources of supply at present available?

asked what was the number of officers (by rank) on the Active List of the Regular Army who will be available for service at home in the event of the complete mobilisation of the Expeditionary Force and its dispatch overseas?

It is not considered expedient to publish any detailed information concerning the mobilisation arrangements of the Expeditionary Force and the force remaining in the country after its departure therefrom.

asked what was the number of recruits for the year 30th september, 1911, to 1st October, 1912, who joined the Militia and the Special Reserve, respectively, and who subsequently passed on from these respective forces to the Regular Army?

The figures of those men who joined the Regular Army in this period from the special Reserve are shown on page 107 of the General Annual Report, but these may include recruits of any previous year. The required information could only be obtained by going through each man's case at the record offices, which would take a very long time and involve much labour.

asked the Secretary of State for War what was the present deficiency of horses, according to the latest Returns available for 1913, in the Regular Army and the Territorial Force, respectively; and what was the number of horses and of motor vehicles which it is estimated will be required in the event of the mobilisation and dispatch of the Expeditionary Force overseas, and in the event of the mobilisation of the Army Reserve and of the Territorial Force?

On the 28th February there was a deficiency of 209 horses on the Regular Establishment. The number of horses required on mobilisation amounts to 42,430 for the Expeditionary Force and 83,697 for the Territorial Force; and the number of motor vehicles required amounts to 1,260 and 531, respectively.

asked the Under-Secretary of State for India whether his attention has been drawn to paragraphs 26 and 27 of chapter III. of the Bengal Excise Manual, 1910, Vol. II., which provides that in the settlement of country liquor shops, when the bid reaches a figure beyond which no profit can be made, the presiding officer should stop the auction and exercise his discretion as to the person to whom the settlement should be given; whether he is aware that the Board of Revenue of Bihar and Orissa has issued a circular, dated 29th October, 1912, in which this restriction of the auction system is countermanded; whether it is in the public interest that vendors should be allowed to pay excessive licensing fees and so create the temptation to recoup themselves by a a resort to illegal practices; whether restrictions have been imposed upon the auction system in other provinces with salutary results; and whether, in view of these facts, he will make representations to the Government of India with a view to securing the readoption of the rule by the Government of Bihar and Orissa?

The Secretary of State is aware of the Bengal rule. He has not seen the circular of the Board of Revenue, Bihar and Orissa, to which my hon. Friend refers, and cannot therefore say what changes have been adopted or on what grounds, but he will make inquiry.

asked the Under-Secretary of State for India whether he is aware that in February, 1912, the Madras Legislative Council passed a resolution recommending a gradual reduction of the strength of arrack by two degrees in each of the first two years and by another degree in the third year, and the prohibition of the sale of arrack and toddy to persons below the age of sixteen years; and whether any orders have since been issued by the Government of Madras upon these two points?

The Government of Madras have prohibited, with effect from 1st April next, the sale of arrack and toddy to persons below the age of sixteen, and they have instructed the Board of Revenue to select and propose districts in which the experiment of reducing gradually the sale strength of arrack from thirty degress to thirty-five degrees under proof will be tried.

asked whether the Government has purchased an airship from the German Parseval Company and also the plans and specifications for constructing similar airships; and whether airships of this class will now be constructed in this country?

The Admiralty have placed an order for a German Parseval airship, but have obtained no rights for constructing this type of aircraft in this country.

asked how many aeroplanes we have at present with trained men for them actually available for war service at the present time?

I propose to make a full statement on this subject on the introduction of Army Estimates to-morrow.

asked what provision will be made by the Government of India for the mother and sisters of the late Lieutenant Bowers, of the Royal Indian Marine, who perished with Captain scott in the Antarctic expedition?

The matter is still under consideration.

asked what are the rules under which King's India cadetships are granted by the Secretary of State for India; who gives the nominations, and how the selections are made; and whether these cadetships include a remission of fees at sandhurst and the grant of £65, outfit allowance?

Nominations to King's India cadetships are made by the Secretary of State for India in Council in accordance with section 35 of the Act for the better Government of India (21 and 22 Vict., cap. 106), the rights conferred by that section on the sons of persons who have served in India having been continued by 23 and 24 Vict., cap. 100. selection is governed by the length and distinction of the father's service, a preference, other things being equal, being given to orphans. Full remission of fees at sandhurst is only granted in cases where, after due inquiry, the circumstances of the family are considered to justify such a concession, but in no case does a King's India cadet have to pay more than is laid down in the sandhurst Regulations for the son of a general or an admiral. The outfit allowance of £65 is only given to King's India cadets who are fatherless and in straitened circumstances.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will, in view of the desire expressed by Members of the House, cause to be published at his earliest convenience in indexed form a volume containing the National Insurance Act, 1911, together with all the statutory papers relating thereto?

Copies of the Act and of an index are already available, and a volume containing all the statutory Rules and Orders under Part I, of the Act up to 31st December last, with an index, is in course of preparation, and will, I hope, be available in a few days.

asked the President of the Board of Trade how many applications were received from Post Office employés in Wales (male) for the vacancies of inspectors, assistant inspectors, and health insurance officers under the National Health Commission (Wales), in response to the invitation published in Post Office Circular, No. 2031, on 23rd January, 1912, and how many appointments, if any, were given to employés of the Post Office in Wales, and, if none, will he state the reason; will he say whether the Health Insurance Commissioners of Wales decided not to allocate any of the appointments referred to above to officers below the rank of second division clerks; and, in view of the fact that this particular class for Post Office purposes is exclusively employed in London, under what circumstances did the Welsh Commissioners come to a decision to exclude from such appointments made under the National Insurance Act members of the existing Post Office service in Wales?

I am not aware of the number of applications for such positions received from Post Office employés in Wales. No member of the outdoor staff was at the time of appointment employed in a Post Office in Wales, but all applications received equal consideration on their merits, and I would remind my hon. Friend that it was the duty of those making the appointments to select the best men available for the work, and not to distribute any definite proportion among different Government offices. The Welsh Insurance Commissioners have not come to any such decisions as those suggested in the question.

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether he is aware that the enginemen and firemen employed by the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company have not adequate protection from the weather, which results in an increase of sickness and consequent strain upon the National Health Insurance Act; and whether he will take steps to see that an alteration takes place for the protection of these men?

I have communicated with the railway company on the subject of my hon. Friend's question, and have received a reply to the effect that their engines are all fitted with adequate cab accommodation and that the men are quite as well protected from the weather as those on any other railway. The company add that their enginemen axe conspicuously free from illness.

asked the Secretary to the Treasury if he can say whether a man of fifty years of age under the National Insurance Act is entitled to 1s. a week from his approved society if his employer only pays him 9s. a week under the Workmen's Compensation Act?

In the case of a man already fifty years of age before he became an employed contributor the normal rate of sickness benefit is 7s. a week, and no sickness benefit would be payable during incapacity caused by an accident in respect of which he was receiving compensation of the weekly value of 9s. If he became fifty after becoming an employed contributor he would in the circumstances stated, and under the ordinary conditions, be entitled to receive 1s. a week sickness benefit in addition to the compensation.

If the man had only 7s. a week from his employer, would he get anything in addition?

If he was over fifty years of age before the passing of the Act and receives 7s. a week from his employer, he would not be insured for any more.

He would not get any sickness benefit?

To get sick benefit when he is receiving workmen's compensation, he would have to pay a considerably higher premium than he is paying.

Would he have been paying for sickness benefit and not get anything for it, if the employer is paying his 7s. a week?

In the finance of the Act it is arranged that he should not be paid sick benefit during the time he receives workmen's compensation. To receive sick benefit during that time he would have to pay a higher premium than he is paying.

The right hon. Gentleman has already given two or three clear answers.

asked the number to a recent date of insured persons in receipt of sanatorium benefit; whether any uninsured persons have received treatment; the number of insured persons who have received sick pay with the total amount paid out; the number who have received unemployment benefit and the amount; and the number of persons who have received maternity benefit?

With regard to the first part of the question, I have at present no later figures relating to the whole of the United Kingdom than those included in the Return presented on 12th February last. The answer to the second part of the question is in the affirmative. The benefits referred to in the third and fifth parts of the question have only been in operation for two months, and it appears to me to be premature to ask for a special return for the 23,500 societies and branches through which these benefits are administered. With regard to the fourth part of the question, I would refer my hon. Friend to my right hon. Friend the President of the Board of Trade.

asked whether doubt exists as to the liability of certain types of share fishermen in Scotland to pay contributions under the National Insurance Act, and that in consequence difficulty has arisen in connection with the administration of the Act; and whether, in these circumstances, the Secretary to the Treasury will take steps to obtain a decision of the Court of session on the subject by means of the machinery provided by the Act for that purpose?

Yes, sir. I am informed by the Scottish Insurance Commissioners that there is some uncertainty in a few areas as to whether particular classes of share fishermen are employed within the meaning of the Insurance Act, and they are now taking steps under section 66 (1) (iii.) to obtain the decision of the Court of session as suggested by my hon. Friend.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether his attention has been called to the existing discontent in the Excise branch of the Customs and Excise service; and if he will grant an independent inquiry into the cause of the discontent by means of a select Committee or otherwise?

The terms of amalgamation of the Customs and Excise services were settled by a Committee, under the Chairmanship of my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, after full inquiry and consideration extending over a period of eighteen months. Subsequently I gave careful consideration to the whole matter myself and rceived several deputations, and in May last I announced a number of liberal concessions. There can be no question that the settlement has conferred substantial improvements in the scales of pay and conditions of service. Complaints on various points have been brought to my notice, but this is of course, to be expected with every settlement, and I have seen nothing that would justify the further inquiry now suggested.

asked, seeing that the number of unattached surveyors of Excise origin is dwindling rapidly, when examinations will be resumed; and how many officers of Excise origin are likely to be called to the first examination?

As regards the date of the first examination I must refer the hon. Member to my answer to a question addressed to me by the hon. and gallant Member for St. Albans on the 13th instant on this subject. The number of officers, whether of Customs or Excise origin who may compete at the examination cannot be stated at present.

asked whether certain late first-class examining officers of Customs have been appointed surveyors of Customs and Excise and placed in charge of Excise districts; whether there is any record of their being unable to perform the work of the districts in which they have officiated; and whether they have in any instance sought help from the officers they supervise in regard to the work of the district?

Certain officers, late first-class examining officers of Customs, have been appointed to be unattached surveyors of Customs and Excise, and in that capacity they take temporary charge of surveyors' districts, with Customs or Excise work, as required. The collectors, under whom these unattached surveyors have served, and who are responsible to the Board for the conduct of business, report in satisfactory terms as to the manner in which their duties have been performed.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the amount of the Import Duty on nicotine used as an insecticide by hop-growers, farmers, and gardeners; and whether he can give any reason for nicotine being much more expensive to users of that insecticide in this country than in France?

There is no Import Duty on nicotine, nor is there any duty upon nicotine manufactured in this country. With regard to the last part of the question I have no information.

asked whether, as in the case of other like forms required for the purposes of the Finance (1909–10) Act, 1910, he will direct that copies of the printed form of particulars of assessment for Undeveloped Land Duty, known as Form 210, Land, shall be supplied by the Commissioners of Inland Revenue to bonâ fide applicants and so save labour and expense in copying to those who have to fill in a large number of such forms?

It has not been the practice to supply copies of the forms required for the purposes of Part I of the Finance (1909–10) Act, 1910, and I see no reason for making an exception in the case of Form 210, which is one retained by the taxpayer to whom it is issued.

May I ask whether the right hon. Gentleman is aware that great inconvenience is caused to nursery gardeners and people of that description who have not had that form served on them?

If the hon. Gentleman will put to me any cases where they have suffered any inconvenience of this kind I will be very happy to look into the matter.

If these forms cannot be provided free of cost to those who have to fill up a large number of them, as some solicitors have to do, will the right hon. Gentleman be prepared to provide them for some nominal consideration?

I will consider that suggestion.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if, when the War Office made their request to the Treasury, that in the case of soldiers of the Regular Army, or of sailors in the Royal Navy, leaving without pension and subsequently entering the Civil service of the Crown, their years of active service in the Army or Navy should count for pension in the Civil services, any approximate estimate was prepared or given as the probable cost of the removal of the present hardship felt in both branches of the militant services; and, if no such estimate was arrived at, whether he will now take steps to have one prepared?

The answer to the first part of the question is in the negative. No close estimate could he given without very elaborate investigations which I am not prepared to undertake, but I consider that the cost cannot safely be put at less than £75,000 a year.

asked how many provisional original valuations under the Finance (1909–10) Act, 1910, were issued in Great Britain and Ireland, respectively, up to 30th september, 1912; the total cost of all the provisional original valuations issued in Great Britain and Ireland, respectively, up to that date; and accordingly the average cost for Great Britain and Ireland, respectively, of each provisional original valuation issued up to that date; and why the average cost is so high in the case of Ireland, where all the information was stated to be already available?

Up to 30th September last, 2,583,453 provisional valuations, relating to 3,256,568 hereditaments were issued in Great Britain, and about 25,000 provisional valuations in Ireland. The functions of the Valuation Department both in Great Britain and Ireland are not confined to the making of the original valuations under the Finance (1909–10) Act, 1910, and I am therefore unable to furnish the other information asked for by the hon. Member.

May I ask the right hon. Gentleman if it is not the case that a million valuations have to be made in Ireland, and what is the nature of the provisional valuation made in each of these cases; and further, seeing that only 25,000 valuations have been made up till now, how long it will take to complete the million valuations?

The hon. Gentleman had better put his question on the Paper.

asked the Secretary for Scotland whether the results of the competitive designs for surveyors under the small Holdings Act have yet been determined; and when a public announcement may be expected?

The competitive designs submitted by surveyors have been finally adjudicated upon, and the result has been duly intimated to all the candidates.

asked the Secretary for Scotland if he is aware that a grant has been made by the Development Commissioners to the Board of Agriculture and Fisheries for the purpose of creating farm institutes for the instruction of agricultural students; whether the Board of Agriculture for Scotland has made application for a similar grant to Scotland; and whether, in view of the interest taken in this matter by the Scottish Chamber of Agriculture and other representative bodies in Scotland, he can state that Scottish interests will have a fair share of any funds allotted for this purpose?

The answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative. In answer to the other parts of the question, the Board of Agriculture for Scotland has been preparing applications of the character referred to, which will shortly be sent to the Development Commissioners, who will doubtless give fair consideration to the claims of Scotland.

asked the Secretary for Scotland how long the Report of the special Commissioners who investigated the possibilities of oyster and mussel culture in the Shetland Isles has been under consideration; and if he will now lay the said Report upon the Table of the House?

The Fishery Board are considering the Report in connection with inquiries relating to other parts of Scotland with a view to preparing a comprehensive scheme. When they report they propose to deal with Scotland as a whole.

asked the Lord Advocate whether his attention has been called to the advertisement of the production at the Royalty Theatre, Glasgow, of a play which has been prohibited by the Censor; and whether he proposes to take any action either to give effect to the censorship or to remove it altogether in Scotland?

The answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative, and to the second part that I am at present considering the question whether legal proceedings should be taken.

asked the hon. Member for St. George's-in-the-East, as representing the First Commissioner of works, whether the attention of the First Commissioner has been called to the fact that the inscription on the brazen tablet recently placed in Westminster Hall in commemoration of the trial of Warren Hastings that "on this spot Warren Hastings stood for his trial" is bad English and likewise unmeaning; and whether, in order to make the inscription more intelligible and in consonance with the English language, the First Commissioner will give directions that the word "for" should be deleted from the inscription, and the word "at" placed in its stead, or that the forms of either of the inscriptions in Westminster Hall on the tablets in commemoration of the trials of Charles I. and Strafford, in which on one tablet it is stated that the tablet "marks the spot where Charles Stuart, King of England, stood before the Court which sat for his trial," and on the other tablet that it "marks the place where Strafford stood during the impeachment," be adopted, with the necessary alterations, and inscribed on the Warren Hastings' tablet?

The attention of the First Commissioner has been called to the tablet, but he is unable to agree with my hon. Friend that the words are ungrammatical. He is of opinion, taking all things into consideration, that they are open to less criticism than any of the alternatives suggested by my hon. Friend.

Before the First Commissioner made up his mind as to the use of "stood for" on this tablet did he consult the authorities, from which he would see that there is no authority whatever for the use of these words?

I have no doubt that the First Commissioner, before coming to a decision, took all necessary steps in the way of consultation.

Will my hon. Friend give me an assurance that in the case of future tablets the words to be used on these memorials in Westminster Hall will be so devised as to he understood by the people at large?

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty whether the Government received four years ago from a group of Continental engineers plans and designs for a new type of naval destroyer, faster than any existing battleship, armed with a single gun of maximum power to fire a projectile playing the part of an aerial torpedo, and presenting to the enemy's fire only a bow-shield of such shape and thickness as to be impenetrable; whether such plans were considered and rejected; whether it is known that a foreign Power accepted them and has now completely modified its naval policy owing to the value of this new type of naval destroyer, which is claimed as rendering the building of "Dreadnoughts" futile; and, if so, will he say how the Government intend to meet the situation?

There is no record of any such proposal having been received at the Admiralty. There is no evidence that any foreign nation has modified its naval policy on account of the adoption of a vessel of the type referred to. So far as this country is concerned, there is no change in the situation calling for a reconsideration of naval policy.

asked whether a workman, when he is placed on the establishment in the Royal dockyards, signs any form or document whereby he can be compelled to work overtime if requested by his foreman or superintendent?

A workman when placed on the established list does not sign any formal document which involves any specific liability to work overtime. But, naturally, his continued employment is contingent upon the faithful discharge of his duties. I may add that, under section 8 of the superannuation Act of 1859, the full pension on discharge can be granted only when the head of the department certifies that the established man has served with diligence and fidelity and to his satisfaction.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that men who refused to work overtime have been threatened with a heavy fine or discharge from the service?

Is it in the employment of the Admiralty?

Yes.

I am not aware of that, but, as I said, continued employment is contingent upon the faithful discharge of his duties.

Does that carry with it the right of the Admiralty to send these men to work whether they are physically fit or not?

Certainly not. No man who is physically infirm would work overtime.

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty whether the reference in the "Shipping Gazette" of 1st March to the terms on which Royal Naval Reserve officers can be transferred from the merchant service to the Royal Navy, with regard to promotion to the rank of commander in cases of exceptional services, is intended to indicate the highest rank which is open to any such officers transferred to the Royal Navy; and; if so, whether he is aware that the terms offered are not such as to induce the most useful and promising officers in the merchant service to join the Royal Navy?

The answer to the question is in the negative. A supplementary lieutenant who is promoted to commander can reach the highest rank in the naval service.

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty whether, in regard to the forthcoming appointment of a certain number of officers of the merchant service as lieutenants in the Royal Navy, the inducements offered to these officers are to be inferior to those which were offered when last the Admiralty availed themselves of the services of merchant service officers in a similar way; whether it is proposed to restrict the pay to 10s. per diem and to stop the 2s. daily mess allowance in addition, which was previously granted; and whether he will consider the advisability of offering such inducements as are likely to lead to the acquisition of the very best and most efficient talent from the merchant service?

Owing to the abolition of the messing allowance, the full pay of supplementary lieutenants will be slightly less than the scale in force when officers were previously entered. In other respects the inducements are the same, and in regard to the chances of promotion the new supplementary lieuenants will be at a distinct advantage. The pay will start at 10s. a day and rise to 16s. a day without messing allowance. This with the other advantages attaching to service in the Royal Navy will, it is expected, attract most suitable officers from the Royal Naval Reserve.

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty if he will state what was the approximate number of canings inflicted on boys in the Royal Navy in the years 1910 and 1911, respectively, as compared with the 1,500 stated by him to have been the approximate number in 1909; and whether the new regulation, limiting the award of this punishment to offences of a grave character, will apply also to the naval training establishments at Shotley and elsewhere?

I am informed that the total number of canings awarded to boys of the Royal Navy in the years 1910 and 1911 is not available, and that to obtain even approximate figures would involve the examination of over 2,000 quarterly punishment returns that are rendered from the fleet. With regard to the last part of the question, the regulation limiting the award of caning to certain serious offences, are applicable to all ships and naval establishments.

Seeing that the predecessor of the right hon. Gentleman was able to obtain the approximate number, is not the House of Commons entitled to know the extent of these punishments in the Royal Navy?

asked the President of the Board of Trade (1) whether he is aware of the growing practice on the Midland Railway to run double-headed trains with as many as 100 wagons with only one brake-van; and, having regard to the danger to the railwaymen and the travelling public that must arise if any accident occurs, what steps he proposes to take to deal with the matter; and (2) whether he is aware that on Sunday, 23rd February, the 11.10 a.m. Midland Railway train left Gawhole sidings for Moston sidings, Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway, a distance of over fifteen miles, passing over en route a dangerous gradient and three important junctions; that one of the drivers of the train, which was double-headed, informed the foreman that he did not know the road and that he had not been over a portion of the road in his life; that the foreman informed him that he must go as the other driver knew the road, and that was sufficient; and, having regard to the fact that this is a distinct violation of Rule 138 of the company's rules and regulations and a standing menace both to the men and the public, what action he proposes to take to safeguard the men who endeavour to strictly carry out the rules and regulations of the company?

I have communicated with the company in regard to the matters referred to in these questions, relating to the Midland Railway Company, and will inform my hon. Friend of the result.

asked the Prime Minister the number of judges, including Lords of Appeal, who are at present serving on committees of inquiry appointed by the Government or Royal Commissions; and the average number of hours per week that they are absent from their judicial duties by reason of such inquiries?

There are two judges, including Lords of Appeal, now engaged on Royal Commissions or Committees of Inquiry: Lord Parker, who is presiding over the Committee of experts in the Marconi Inquiry; Mr. Justice Darling, who is serving on the Judicial Commission. Neither of them has been absent from his judicial duties by reason of such inquiries.

What is the use of appointing one additional judge to wipe out arrears of judicial business when you are taking two judges away from their judicial duties?

The hon. Gentleman did not listen to me. If he had done me the courtesy to do so, he would have known that I said that neither of them had been withdrawn for one moment from his judicial duties.

asked the Prime Minister whether, before the promised measure to confer self-government on the Kingdom of Scotland is proceeded with, it is his intention to reorganise the Scottish Legal Department; and whether in any such reorganisation the office of Lord Advocate will be discontinued or amalgamated and the salary attached diverted to other purposes?

I am not aware of any grounds for such reorganisation as the hon. Member suggests.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that the present holder of this office found time to address twenty-six meetings in connection with the recent London County Council election?

I know that there has never been one day's arrears in the work of that office.

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether it is proposed to appoint an advisory committee to instruct and assist the British delegates at the international conference on the load-line regulations of ships; and, if so, can he state the names of the persons who will form this committee?

As I have already announced, I propose to appoint a Committee to advise me as to the instructions to be given to the British delegates at the International Load-Line Conference, and for this purpose it will be necessary for the Committee to consider whether the tables of freeboard now in force require any, and, if so, what modification. I ant not at present in a position to give the names of the members of the Committee, but I hope to be able to do so shortly.

asked the quantity of fresh milk imported into England from France during the month of January, 1912?

The quantity of fresh milk consigned from France which was imported into the United Kingdom in January last was 1,873 cwts. There were no imports of milk from France in January, 1912.

asked the Postmaster-General whether his Department ever invite a firm to tender for a contract if it is known that the firm in its treatment of its employés does not come up to the standard laid down in the Fair-Wages Clause?

The Fair-Wages Clause is a condition of all Post Office contracts, and any wilful non-observance of this condition results in the name of the offending firm being removed from the Post Office list. As a general rule, however, the representations made to a firm whose wages conditions appear to be below the proper standard lead to satisfactory results.

asked the Postmaster-General what steps he is taking to provide a new post office and telephone service for the town of Gillingham, Dorset; whether he is aware that the plans for the said post office were under consideration by his Department as long ago as October, 1911, and that repeated answers have been given, both to letters and to a deputation, that the matter was receiving attention; and whether, under these circumstances, he can promise immediate action?

The need for a new post office at Gillingham, Dorset, has long been recognised, but the case has presented considerable difficulties. The proposals to which the hon. Member refers were laid before the Treasury in the latter part of last year, but, in view of certain defects attaching to the site that was offered, they did not see their way to authorise the scheme. Fresh proposals, however, which include accommodation for a telephone exchange, are now being submitted to them, and, if the scheme meets with their approval, I have every hope that building operations will be begun in the course of the present calendar year. Au exchange will be opened when the new building is ready if the support then available or in prospect justifies it financially.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that the constant deferment of the provision of a new post office and telephone service at Gillingham has caused great inconvenience at that end of both Dorset and Wilts?

I am hoping that these matters may now be dealt with at an early date.

asked whether the Postmaster-General's attention has been drawn to the resolution of the Dublin Chamber of Commerce, and adopted at the annual meeting of the Association of Chambers of Commerce of the United Kingdom, complaining of the frequent interruptions of the telegraphic service to Dublin viâ Holyhead; and whether he is prepared to adopt the suggestion that underground wires should be laid to obviate the frequent delays in the transmission of messages?

As informed my hon. Friend in an answer to a question on the 12th February, there are eleven cables now crossing the Irish Channel from four different points on the coasts of Wales or Scotland, and, as the lines connected with these cables are never interrupted simultaneously, the slight additional protection afforded by an underground line on one route would be out of proportion to the heavy cost involved in its provision.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that since 1st January there have been many complete breakdowns in the transmission of telegraphic messages between Dublin stock Exchange and London, and that thirteen occurred during last February?

The direct line between Dublin stock Exchange and London has been interrupted from time to time, but generally within a few minutes other lines of communication have been utilised. All telegraph lines are more or less liable to interruption from time to time.

Is it not the fact that there is congestion on the other lines, and that messages ordinarily sent by Anglesey are sent over other lines in the North of Ireland.

I do not think there is any congestion. There have been interruptions of the Dublin stock Exchange line, but there have been always other means of communication available. These interruptions are not due to storms; they are electric.

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will say when an answer may be expected to the petitions of the prison warders of August last for a rise of pay, which has become necessary owing to the greatly increased cost of living during recent years?

I am sorry that I am not yet in a position to give any definite answer. I have been in communication with the Treasury, but it is on financial grounds impossible to arrive at any immediate decision. I can only say that the subject will be fully considered during the coming financial year.

Is it not the fact that these men have been waiting twenty years for an increase of salary?

I would like notice of that question.

asked whether in view of the facts that no additional women factory inspectors have been appointed since 1908 other than those needed to fill posts which have been vacated, and that during these years the number of working women coming under Home Office inspection have increased from one and a half millions to nearly two millions, the Home Secretary will make a substantial increase in His Majesty's women inspectors' staff?

My hon. Friend has, I think, been misinformed as to the figures of employment of women in factories and workshops. The last Return relates to the year 1907, when the number was 1,852,241, and not 1,500,000, and there are no figures as to the number at present employed. The Return for 1912 is now being collected. Proposals for strengthening the staff of the Factory Department are now under consideration, and I hope to make an addition to the women inspectors' staff as well as to the staff of other branches of the Department.

asked whether the Returns called for from the Scottish mineowners, under the Mines (Rescue and Aid) Order, have now been examined; and whether, having regard to the danger to life and limb to which miners as a class are constantly exposed, the Home Secretary will take immediate action to secure the formation of rescue brigades, the provision of up-to-date rescue and ambulance appliances, and the establishment of rescue stations throughout the Lanarkshire and other Scottish coalfields in terms of Section 85 of the Coal Mines Act, 1911?

Yes, Sir; the Returns have now been tabulated, and, I regret to say, show that in some counties the progress made is far from satisfactory. The Order has now been in force for nearly a year, and the owners have had ample time in which to make their arrangements; and unless I receive an assurance from them that energetic steps will be taken at once to secure full compliance with the Order at an early date it will be necessary to take legal proceedings to enforce the Order.

asked whether, in a circular recently issued by his Department inviting applications for two additional inspectorships under the Cruelty to Animals Act, 1876, it is stipulated that all applicants should be registered medical practitioners; and, if so, why, in making appointments requiring expert veterinary knowledge, preference is given to doctors over qualified veterinary surgeons?

In accordance with the recommendation of the majority of the Royal Commission on Vivisection, I invited applications from registered medical practitioners, but I would refer the hon. Member to the reply which I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Peterborough on the 12th February, supplementing the terms of the circular.

Will not the right hon. Gentleman tell us that the veterinary surgeon is better qualified by education to properly gauge the effect of vivisection on living animals than members of the medical profession?

In view of the evidence given before the Royal Commission, I doubt whether I should be justified in making the admission the hon. Gentleman asks.

May I ask the right hon. Gentleman whether medical practitioners have a much more severe and searching course than is the case with veterinary surgeons?

I doubt the wisdom of arguing the question at this stage.

asked the amount of the annual contribution by the Treasury towards the pay and clothing of the police force in England and Scotland, respectively?

In the case of Scotland a fixed annual sum of £180,000 a year is paid from the local taxation moneys towards the cost of the clothing and pay of the police. In the case of England a Grant is made also from local taxation moneys of one-half of the pay and clothing of police. The amount of this Grant for the last year for which figures are available (excluding London, where special arrangements prevail) was £1,372,035. It would, however, be incorrect to infer from these figures that there is inequality between England and Scotland. The total sums available for contributions to local purposes are rateably apportioned between the two countries, and the effect of more being given out of this total for police services in England is merely to reduce in proportion the amount available for other local purposes.

asked the President of the Board of Education whether he is aware that the chairman of managers of a Church of England school in Somerset-shire has been fined by the county bench for assaulting one of the teachers and has been locked out of the school for weeks while a guard of the parishioners watched night and day to prevent his entry; whether he knows that the county education authority has recently held four local inquiries into the condition of the school; and whether any power can be exercised by the local education authority or the Board of Education to remove those managers whose present position leads to scandals of this character?

I have no knowledge of the matters referred to in the first part of the question, nor am I aware of the number of local inquiries held by the county education authority with reference to the condition of the school. Neither the Board nor the local education authority have any direct power to remove individual managers, but the Board are, of course, able to intervene in other ways for the purpose of securing the efficiency of the school.

Having been provided with all these facts, chapter and verse, will the right hon. Gentleman press the local authority to insist on having a new scheme for this school, so that these scandals may be avoided?

I have no authority to press upon them a new scheme. If the hon. Gentleman will send me any information I will look into it.

asked the President of the Local Government Board whether foreign milk imported into the United Kingdom is subject to any examination and tests as to its purity; and whether the cows from which it is obtained are subject to any inspection?

Samples of imported milk are taken at frequent intervals by my inspectors, and are submitted to full bacteriological examination. I understand that in the district from which this milk is derived provision is made for the periodical examination of dairy cattle by veterinary surgeons.

May I ask is the examination carried out by the Local Government Board?

The examination is not made by the Local Government Board, but by veterinary surgeons in the district from which the milk is derived.

Does the reply of the hon. Gentleman apply to milk powder, as well as to fresh milk imported from abroad?

The question relates to milk alone, and to that the answer is confined.

asked how many local authorities have complied with the Local Government Board's circular of 2nd September, 1911, suggesting that they should insert in all contracts involving the expenditure of public money the clause suggested by the Fair-Wages Advisory Committee and set out in the Local Government Board's Circular of the above date; what clauses with regard to the employment of labour are in practice inserted by local authorities in their contracts at the present time; how many insert no clauses or clauses other than those recommended by the Fair-Wages Advisory Committee; whether, if this information is not at present available, he will obtain from local authorities a Return showing how many local authorities insert in their contracts clauses with regard to the conditions upon which labour is to be employed; and what the exact words of such clauses are and when such clauses were first introduced by the respective local authorities in their contracts?

The information asked for in the question is not available, and could only be obtained by means of a Return, the collection of the material for which would be a lengthy and laborious process.

asked the President of the Local Government Board whether his attention has been called to the case of eight men sentenced at the Ashford Police Court to fourteen days' hard labour for refusing to perform the allotted task of breaking stone at the West Ashford casual ward, Hothfield; whether he is aware that the strike of these men arose out of the refusal of the superintendent to grant the men's request for hot water to wash down the bread supplied for breakfast; whether the Regulations insist that cold water is an item of the menu; and, if so, will steps be taken giving discretion to superintendents of casual wards to make concessions of the nature indicated in the request of these strikers?

I have made some inquiry in this matter. I understand that the men referred to refused to do their tasks unless supplied with a hot beverage, either tea, coffee, or cocoa, in addition to the dietary allowance of bread. The regulations do not contain any provision as to the supply of drinking water, but I understand the men were told they could obtain warm water if they required it.

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether he is aware that the Congested Districts Board has not yet constructed the boat-slip at Cooscroum, nor the boat-slip at the southern side of the quay at Caherciveen, nor have they taken steps to mark the sunken rocks in the estuary at Portmagee which are a source of danger to the fishing boats passing up and down; and whether, in view of the frequent representations made on the subject, these necessary works will be taken in hand immediately at the beginning of the new financial year?

inquiries will be made by members of the Congested Districts Board as to whether a boat-slip is necessary at Cooscroum, near Caherciveen, at which place the Board have recently built a pier at considerable cost. The Board have offered to contribute one-half the cost of building a boat-slip at Caherciveen if the county council will undertake the work, but this offer has not yet been accepted by the council. Inquiries will also be made as to the necessity for having the berthage at Portmagee Pier cleared of rocks to enable steamers to lie alongside it at low tide.

asked whether the Congested Districts Board have taken any steps to purchase the estate of John M'Keon, of Drumparson, situated in the parish of Kiltubrid, county Leitrim; and, if not, whether, having regard to the amount of congestion in the district, they would take immediate action in this case?

The Congested Districts Board communicated with the owner regarding a sale of the estate referred to, but it has not so far been offered for sale through the Board. A further communication will now be addressed to him in the matter.

asked the Chief Secretary what area of arable land is flooded in the Redhills district, county Cavan, owing to obstructions in the river between Lough Sarah, at Castlesanderson, and Killabandrick Lough; and will he have an inspector sent to investigate and report in this matter, stating the probable cost of freeing the water in this district?

I understand the lands in question are within the area of the Lough and River Erne Drainage Board. It would apparently rest with the local interests concerned to take any such action as is suggested by the hon. Member. The Board of Works have no powers in the matter.

Do I understand the right hon. Gentleman to say that there is nobody responsible in this House, or that nothing can be done to deal with this very serious matter, affecting as it does a poor and populous district?

I am not sure of the powers of the local authority, but the Board of Works has no authority.

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether, upon the outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in that country last year, the Department of which he is President consulted the Irish Law Officers as to the legality of the action of the English Department in acting as they did towards Irish stock by refusing animals from areas healthy for the past thirty years being sent to markets in Great Britain; if he will circulate with the Votes a copy of the case submitted and the opinion received; whether he is aware that, in the opinion of some lawyers and others, the action of the English Department towards Ireland last year was that recited in the Act authorising its coming into existence as applicable to foreign animals coming to Great Britain from without the United Kingdom; and whether he has acquainted himself with the promises made in the speeches of the Ministers and others responsible for the introduction of the Bill that Ireland would in reality be treated as a part of the United Kingdom?

The Irish Law Officers were not consulted on the point mentioned, as action corresponding in general character to that of the Board of Agriculture and Fisheries had been taken from time to time in previous years by the Department, with a view to safeguard Ireland from the introduction of disease from Great Britain. The Department's Orders for this purpose were approved by the then existing Law Officers before issue.

Did the Irish Department consult their own Law Officers before they took the same action with regard to English cattle?

The Department's Orders were approved by the Law Officers.

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland (1) whether he is aware that the police authorities in Dublin have instituted prosecutions against traders in Great Britain Street for persevering in a custom of exhibiting goods for sale eighteen inches or so outside their doors and windows, but well within the space conveyed to them by the lease of their premises, which extends to nearly four feet and over, which, before their voluntary removal of railings which marked the limit of their premises, they could use as they pleased and as if it were within the walls of their house; if he is aware that the ancient railings were removed in concert with, but not enforced by, the Corporation of Dublin for the purposes of the uniform paving of the whole pathway, and on the distinct understanding that leasehold rights and ancient usage would not thereby be in any way changed, and that the corporation, which with the occupiers ought equitably be regarded as the joint controllers, are no party and have refused to be a party to the action of the police; and whether, having regard to these circumstances, which make the prosecutions, even if successful, a purely technical triumph, he will order the proceedings to be discontinued; and (2) whether the prosecutions recently taken by the Dublin police against traders in Great Britain Street were considered by the Law Officers of the Crown, and upon what evidence, before they were initiated, or whether they are the outcome of the unrestricted exercise of subordinate officials; and whether, to bring the administration of the law into harmony -with the people interested, he will direct that the local civic authority and the ratepayers generally be consulted before taking part in any further proceedings in order that, even if there is a technical offence, the matter may be adjusted in such a way that the occupiers of the premises may not be wholly deprived of the right of usage which they regarded as an asset when acquiring the property as leasehold, and at the same time limit the use to such a degree that no possible impediment to pedestrians can arise?

Several traders in the street referred to were summoned by the police for exposing goods for sale on the public footpath. The prosecutions falling within the ordinary police jurisdiction were not sufficiently important to bring before the Law Officers. Such prosecutions are general throughout the Dublin Metropolitan police district, and the defendants were legally represented, and it was open to them to have had all the matters referred to in the questions gone into before the magistrate who convicted in the cases. I am not aware that the public, who are the persons interested, have in any way disapproved of the course pursued.

I beg to ask leave, pursuant to Standing Order 10 on the Resolution of the House yesterday, to move the Adjournment of the House for the purpose of discussing a definite matter of urgent public importance, namely, the failure of the Government to make any provision with regard to the deduction of Income Tax from interest and dividends after 5th April, notwithstanding the decision of the High Court in the case of Bowles against the Bank of England.

The hon. Member for West St. Pancras asks leave to move the Adjournment "for the purpose of discussing a definite matter of urgent public importance, namely, the failure of the Government to make any provision with regard to the deduction of Income Tax from interest and dividends after 5th April, notwithstanding the decision of the High Court in the case of Bowles against the Bank of England." The hon. Member means administrative provision?

Yes.

Not legislative provision?

Administrative provision.

We cannot discuss any legislative provision on the Adjournment. If it refers to administrative provision, the Motion would be in order.

It refers partly to administrative and partly to legislative.

Even if the House grants leave for this discussion, I must warn the hon. Member that he is not entitled to discuss the question of legislative provision; and that he can only discuss the question whether administrative provision can be made or has not been made for the carrying out of the law. Has the hon. Member the leave of the House?