Skip to main content

Constable-Mechanics

Volume 149: debated on Monday 19 December 1921

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

15.

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether the Royal Irish Constabulary mechanic-constables being dismissed at Gormanstown and other places are now receiving a month's notice before dismissal or equivalent compensation; and whether they are being given boat and railway warrants to their homes?

Some of these men have left on termina- tion of their contracts. Others whose original contracts are expiring are being retained at a month's notice, or a week's notice, according to circumstances. All temporary constables of the Royal Irish Constabulary receive, under the terms of their contract, a bounty of £25 at the expiration of a year's service and those who are being discharged on termination of contract are entitled to travelling expenses to their homes. In a few cases men receiving the bounty were discharged without prepayment of fares. These omissions are being rectified.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that when these men were enlisted about a year ago they were told that they would be allowed to re-engage at the end of 12 months for another 12 months' service? Is he aware that that definite offer has been broken, as they were then told that they would be on monthly contracts, and even that has been reduced now to one week's notice? Does not the right hon. Gentleman think that to turn these men out at a week's notice is treating them very badly, in view of the fact that if any railway company treated its employés like that there would be a general strike, and quite right too?

The hon. and gallant Member has made several allegations, and I deny the accuracy of every one of them. I am doing my best to treat these gallant men as generously as I can within the law, and within the terms of their contract.

Does the right hon. Gentleman deny that until I asked him questions about these men they were being sent home without railway warrants?

A few were sent off through an inadvertence, but that mistake has been corrected.

Yes, and I am profoundly sorry the mistake occurred. I appreciate my hon. and gallant Friend's interest in the matter.

Does he deny that these men were definitely offered the chance of taking on again for another 12 months at the end of their 12 months' contract, that that was altered to a month, and then to a week's contract?

Will the right hon. Gentleman make inquiries and bring pressure to bear to see that these men are not handicapped in this way after having served their country?

I have not heard that they have been handicapped in the way referred to by my hon. and gallant Friend. On the contrary, I have information to the very opposite effect.