Skip to main content

King's Roll (Coldstream Burgh)

Volume 163: debated on Wednesday 9 May 1923

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

asked the Minister of Labour whether he is aware that the Secretary of the King's Roll National Council threatens to publish a statement to the effect that the Burgh of Coldstream has failed to qualify for inclusion in the Roll; that the burgh employs in all six men: the town clerk, depute town clerk, burgh officer, and three scavengers; and that of these the town clerk is an ex-service man, the depute is in receipt of a disability pension, the burgh officer served as a volunteer in the South African War, and one of the scavengers is an ex-service man, while the other two have been in the burgh's service for many years; and whether, in these circumstances, he will take steps to protect the Burgh of Coldstream from misrepresentation?

The hon. and gallant Member appears to be under a misapprehension. The King's Roll National Council has issued no such threat. I have been repeatedly pressed in this House to publish a list of local, authorities not on the King's Roll. I referred the matter to the National Council, who decided that, before they could make a recommendation to me, they must make a final appeal to all local authorities. The present protest arises out of this appeal, which naturally made reference to the suggestion of a "black list," but without in any way expressing an opinion as to its advisability. I am glad to be able to say that on examination the Coldstream authority would appear to be eligible for enrolment, and have been so informed.