8.
asked the Minister of Labour whether he is aware that engineers in certain towns have decided to ban overtime and work a 47-hour week as a protest against the recent award by the National Arbitration Tribunal and the way it is being interpreted by employers; and what steps he is taking to assist the Amalgamated Engineering Union to obtain from the tribunal a clearer interpretation of their award?
I have not received any request from the Amalgamated Engineering Union for assistance, and, as provided in the Conditions of Employment and Arbitration Order, it is open to any party to an award to apply to the tribunal if any question arises as to the interpretation of the award. This is the proper course to take if the need for interpretation arises.
Is the Minister of Labour not aware that there are certain towns where the men have refused to work overtime and are only working 47 hours—and that is not on the Clyde? Will he do what he can to get this situation eased in order that the men may have an opportunity of giving of their best?
I am not going to interfere in any way with the operations of the tribunal, which is an impartial body. The unions have their approach to it for their interpretation, and any man who is a member of a union and subject to executive discipline, and who disobeys that union in war-time and restricts production, is acting against the best interests of the country.
Is not the Minister aware that he has power, and has used it, to put workers in gaol for restricting production? Will he not put some of the employers in gaol?