Skip to main content

Bombing Range, Frampton Sand

Volume 466: debated on Wednesday 22 June 1949

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

3.

asked the Secretary of State for Air what plans he has to establish a bombing range in the Severn Estuary at Frampton Sand; and what representations have been made to him in this connection by the Severn Wildfowl Trust.

4.

asked the Secretary of State for Air whether he is aware that the use of the sands at Frampton on Severn for a bombing practice ground is likely to be detrimental to the Severn Wildfowl Trust sanctuary nearby; and whether he will consider finding some other area.

6.

asked the Secretary of State for Air if, before deciding on the bomber range on Frampton Sand, he will take into consideration the claims and criticisms of the Severn Wildfowl Trust.

A proposal to bring back into use the war-time practice bombing range known as Frampton Sand has been under examination by my Department. In view, however, of representations which have been made that the use of the range would seriously interfere with the bird sanctuary there, I am reconsidering the whole matter. If the proposal is abandoned it would, of course, involve finding another range in the district for R.A.F. use.

Is the Minister aware that while there is not the slightest intention on the part of anyone to interfere with the efficiency of the Air Force, the use of this area as a bombing range runs counter to the interests of all the naturalists in the country? This is a unique place, and if the right hon. and learned Gentleman can find another suitable bombing range it will give a great deal of pleasure to a large number of people in the country.

I accept that statement, but I hope hon. Members will appreciate the great difficulty in which I am placed. No matter where I seek to go with a view to acquiring a bombing range for the Royal Air Force, in 10 cases out of 10 there is an objection.

Is the Minister aware that we are glad to find one Minister at least who has got some nice ideas, and if he wants a new bombing range will he try No. 10 Downing Street?

Further to that somewhat sinister suggestion, may I ask my right hon. and learned Friend not to look in the immediate district for a suitable place but to consider going right outside my constituency?

When the right hon. and learned Gentleman has come to a decision finally to abandon the proposal to use this spot for bombing purposes, will he see that the House is informed?