House Of Commons
Thursday, 1st February, 1951
The House met at Half past Two o'Clock
Prayers
[Mr. SPEAKER in the Chair]
Oral Answers To Questions
National Health Service
Tuberculosis
1.
asked the Minister of Health if he will inform all local authorities of the facilities available in the country for the rehabilitation of men and women suffering from tuberculosis, and the desirability of using these facilities to their full capacity.
The attention of local health authorities has been drawn, most recently in July last, to the means available for this purpose, and I am sure they will share my view that they should assist in using these means to the full.
Is the Minister aware that the British Legion village of Preston Hall in Kent today has 50 vacancies for ambulant ex-Service men, and will he again impress upon the local authorities their moral obligations in this matter?
I am sure that this exchange of question and answer will draw attention to the existence of these facilities.
2.
asked the Minister of Health how many beds were available in England and Wales for tuberculosis patients on 1st January, 1949, 1950 and 1951, respectively; and how many patients were awaiting admission to the beds on those dates.
Comparable figures are not available for these three years, but hospital board returns at 31st December, 1949, for the first whole year of the Health Service, showed 28,450 beds in commission (including about 1,250 beds used in hospitals outside the Health Service) and a waiting list of 10,980. Figures at 1st January, 1951, are not yet ready.
While appreciating the progress that has been made, may I ask my right hon. Friend if he will give his closest attention to this problem, and do his utmost to reduce the size of the waiting list of these patients, some of whom are infectious to other people?
Yes, Sir, certainly. I was glad that I was able to give rather encouraging figures to the House last week, and I certainly intend to keep very close personal contact with this particular problem.
Will the Minister say when he proposes to take advantage of the beds available in Switzerland?
There is another Question on that matter on the Order Paper today.
11.
asked the Minister of Health the number of tuberculosis patients in England and Wales awaiting admission to hospitals and sanatoria at the latest convenient date.
The number at present on the waiting list, as provisionally ascertained, is approximately 10,400.
Are the numbers waiting and the period of waiting tending to increase or to decrease?
The figure is about 600 fewer than a year ago. This is the first decrease recorded since the war.
In view of those figures, does the Minister not think that an addition of 1,000 beds to the available beds to deal with tuberculosis would be a very desirable thing, and that it should not be allowed to drag on in the way in which it is now being allowed to drag on?
I have already told the right hon. and gallant Gentleman that I have not yet had a complete report, but such information as I have does not indicate that anything like 1,000 beds would be available.
How does the right hon. Gentleman square that with the relevant figure for Scotland given by his colleague the Joint Under-Secretary of State for Scotland?
I am sure that the right hon. and gallant Gentleman does not want me to try to take the beds away from Scottish patients.
Is my right hon. Friend aware that there are already a number of sanatoria in Switzerland ready to talk on this matter and to take patients at a reasonable cost?
Yes, Sir. I have had two officials in Switzerland recently looking into the matter, and for certain technical reasons it has been decided to send out, tomorrow I think, a senior medical officer to amplify the report they have already rendered.
How can the Minister say that the size of the waiting list is being reduced when he has already this afternoon, in reply to Question No. 1, given a figure of 10,000 for those waiting a year ago, whereas it is now 10,400?
I should like notice of that question. I think my figures do, in fact, show a reduction from 10,980 to 10,400. It may not be precisely 600, but it is very near to it.
14.
asked the Minister of Health whether he will make a statement as to the future of the tuberculosis clinic at 2, Effra Road, Brixton.
It is proposed to close these unsatisfactory premises as soon as possible and to transfer the work to St. Francis' Hospital, Dulwich.
As some of the patients of the now inadequately housed clinic in Brixton may have to pay up to 1s. 6d. for a rather complicated journey to Dulwich, will my right hon. Friend arrange to investigate the possibility of a new clinic in Brixton?
Very up-to-date and modern facilities are now being supplied in Dulwich, which are an enormous improvement on what was available before. I am assured that the distance is only about one mile, but I will certainly gladly look into the accuracy of that information.
Kingston Victoria Hospital
3.
asked the Minister of Health whether, in view of the continuance of the dispute as to the future of the Kingston Victoria Hospital, he will now arrange for an independent investigation into this matter.
I would refer the hon. Member to my statement on the Adjournment debate on 30th January.
Does the right hon. Gentleman recall that he did not deal specifically with this issue during that debate, and in view of the fact that this suggestion was put forward by the British Medical Association is it not entitled to serious consideration?
I hope that the hon. Gentleman accepts the suggestion I made at the conclusion of that debate so that we can go into this matter very thoroughly.
Does the Minister mean that his case is so bad that he is not prepared to submit it to independent investigation?
Hearing Aids
4.
asked the Minister of Health if he is aware that there is a shortage of bone conductor hearing aids in the North-West Region; and if he will take steps to improve the supply of these aids.
Bone-conduction aids are not yet supplied by the National Health Service in any part of the country, but will be as soon as possible.
Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that the fact that these hearing aids are not supplied causes great hardship, particularly to a lot of old people, and will he give what I am sure will be his sympathetic consideration to the need for going into the whole of this question again and trying to provide them as soon as possible?
Yes, Sir. I understand that very considerable research is being done by the Post Office, that it is still going on, and that there are prospects of some success.
Is my right hon. Friend aware that the batteries for these aids are very expensive, costing something between £8 and £10 a year, and will he, through the Health Service, assist people to buy them?
12.
asked the Minister of Health how many applications for hearing aids are outstanding in the boroughs of Wimbledon and Malden, respectively; and how long is the average period of waiting.
Information relating to these areas is not separately available.
County Council Staffs, Durham (Union Membership)
5.
asked the Minister of Health whether his Department has yet received a reply from the Durham County Council to their letter of 17th November, 1950, on the subject of that county council's intention to make trade union membership a condition of employment in the health services controlled by that council; and whether he will publish in the OFFICIAL REPORT the terms of any reply received by him.
I have received a reply a copy of which I am placing in the Library.
Merit Awards
6.
asked the Minister of Health how many merit awards have been made under the National Health Act; and what is the total sum involved.
One thousand seven hundred and forty merit awards have been approved in England and Wales, representing an annual cost of approximately £1¼ million.
Smallpox
7.
asked the Minister of Health whether it is proposed to hold a public inquiry into the origins of the recent smallpox outbreak; whether the original contact entered the United Kingdom from an area where smallpox was prevalent; and whether he was in possession of a vaccination certificate.
As the origin of the outbreak was immediately established, the need for such an inquiry does not arise. The answer to the second and third parts of the Question is "Yes, Sir."
Would the right hon. Gentleman like to pay a tribute to the medical officer of health and all the nurses and doctors who have worked unceasingly to contain this outbreak, to very great effect? Will he also take the earliest opportunity of making it clear that an outbreak affecting some 30 or 40 people among a population of a quarter of a million is one which should not cause this town or district to be isolated from the outside world because, at the moment, it has brought considerable disaster to local trade? Will the right hon. Gentleman do everything to combat that?
I certainly join the hon. and learned Gentleman in saying how greatly we appreciate the work which the doctors and all concerned in the matter have done in the course of this admittedly small outbreak.
Sanatoria, Switzerland
8.
asked the Minister of Health what number of beds are now available in Switzerland for English patients suffering from tuberculosis.
10.
asked the Minister of Health if he can yet make a statement in respect to the proposal for sending tuberculosis sufferers to Switzerland for treatment under the National Health Service.
23.
asked the Minister of Health if he will make it possible for patients from England and Wales to have similar facilities to those to be provided by Scottish hospital authorities for sending their tubercular patients to Switzerland.
25.
asked the Minister of Health whether he has yet found a way in which beds available in tuberculosis sanatoria in Switzerland can be utilised for patients waiting for accommodation in hospitals in this country.
34.
asked the Minister of Health if he can now announce what arrangements have been made for the use of sanatoria in Switzerland for people from England and Wales suffering from tuberculosis.
The possibility of using the available Swiss beds is being considered, but I cannot yet add to previous answers on this matter.
Will the right hon. Gentleman please explain why it is possible for Scotland to have these facilities when the English have not got these facilities? Is it because the former Minister of Health decided that there would be no beds, and is the right hon. Gentleman proposing to carry on that policy to the detriment of the English?
I have said nothing at all in any way in contradiction of what my hon. Friend the Joint Under-Secretary of State for Scotland said recently. She said that explorations were being made on behalf of the Secretary of State for Scotland. They are being made on my behalf, also, in Switzerland at the present time.
Will my right hon. Friend explain the mystery of why it was possible, last week, to give Scotland this facility, when this week it is not possible to make a declaration with regard to England?
I wish my hon. Friend would read HANSARD. There was no declaration that facilities had been afforded or provided for Scotland. There was a declaration that it was under consideration, and that, in particular, discussions were going on with my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer.
In his consideration, will the right hon. Gentleman bear in mind that there is a great deal of urgency, because one of the larger establishments, Montana Hall, is about to close?
I should certainly not like to give any impression that I did not regard the subject as important. Nevertheless, we must keep a sense of proportion about it. I told the House last week that since the start of the Health Service no fewer than 3,550 additional beds for the care of tuberculosis had been provided in England and Wales, and that a very considerable proportion of those had been provided in the last six months. What is available in Switzerland, though I have not so far had a full report, is only a very small fraction of what has been provided, even in recent months, in this country.
Does my right hon. Friend acknowledge that the position in Scotland is, and always has been, very much worse than that in England: and will he inform English Members that they cannot always get the best of both worlds?
Will the Minister make it quite clear that there are the same dilatory results in both countries, that no beds have been made available to patients from either country, and that the complacency shown in his last answer in face of a waiting list of many thousands is quite unjustified?
In this matter the right hon. and gallant Gentleman must be a good judge of complacency.
I provided more beds than the right hon. Gentleman.
Owing to the unsatisfactory nature of the reply, I beg to give notice that I shall raise this matter on the Adjournment at the earliest opportunity.
Question No. 23, Sir.
Question No. 23 has already been answered with Question No. 8. Does the hon. Lady wish to put Question No. 24?
I could not hear the answer, Sir. There was a lot of hubbub going on and I wished to ask a supplementary.
The hon. Lady can ask a supplementary on Question No. 24.
Is the Minister aware that as far back as 16th November his predecessor said that a question of currency was involved in this matter?
We cannot go back to Question No. 8. The Minister is about to answer Question No. 24.
24.
asked the Minister of Health if he will reconsider the position of tuberculosis patients who have tried to help themselves by finding accommodation in Switzerland at their own expense and make some grant towards the cost of their treatment.
I have no power to make such grants.
How many of these tuberculosis patients would have been sent to Switzerland at the State's expense if the Opposition had been successful in their votes against the Health Service Bill?
Will the right hon. Gentleman represent to the Treasury that they should give favourable consideration to this suggestion?
It is no good giving favourable consideration if there is no statutory power.
Is the Minister aware that before the National Health Service local authorities were able to give some aid to people who sought their help when suffering from this complaint? Would he further consider the matter?
Will the Minister give an answer to that question? Will he also accept the assurance that if it is necessary to afford precedence for legislation of this kind, we on this side of the House will be very glad to do it in preference to some of the legislation which the Government are now bringing forward?
Both those questions seem to me to be hypothetical.
rose—
We have had long enough on this Question.
Hospital Accommodation
9.
asked the Minister of Health if he is aware of the shortage of hospital accommodation for chronic cases in Durham and Chester-le-Street areas; and what action he proposes to take to provide sufficient hospital accommodation for such cases.
Yes, Sir; but it is hoped to provide an additional 49 beds within a few months at two hospitals in these areas. Improved out-patient treatment will also help to promote recovery.
19.
asked the Minister of Health whether he is aware of the urgent need in Cardiff for hospital accommodation for old people who have no relatives to care for them; and whether be will make a statement.
I am not aware of special difficulties in Cardiff. If my hon. Friend has any particular case in mind, I shall be glad to make inquiries.
22.
asked the Minister of Health if he is aware of the acute shortage of hospital beds in the Grantham, Sleaford and Lincoln areas; and what steps he proposes taking in the matter.
Yes, Sir. The position will be relieved as St. George's Hospital, Lincoln, is brought into fuller use. Part of that hospital was reopened last year and the board propose to bring further sections of the hospital into operation as soon as circumstances permit.
Will the right hon. Gentleman get on with this matter fairly quickly, as it was brought to the attention of his predecessor some time ago? Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that people who were injured nearly a year ago are still waiting to get into hospital?
Yes, Sir, but good progress has been made, and this hospital will provide 356 additional beds very shortly.
Will my right hon. Friend state the extent to which the hospital service generally has expanded compared with the years before the war, and in making that statement demonstrate to the Opposition that considerable progress has been made?
All the Questions which have been asked relating to long waiting lists reveal the inadequacy of the system which we took over.
Will the Minister agree that we are 50,000 beds short of the figure which was provided during the war by myself and my colleagues?
The Question relates to Lincoln and not to the country as a whole.
30 and 31.
asked the Minister of Health (1) what immediate steps he proposes to take to increase the number of hospital beds available at the Cardiff Royal Infirmary and the Llandough Hospital;
(2) whether, in view of the fact that there are 5,781 people waiting for 735 beds in the Cardiff Royal Infirmary and the Llandough Penarth Hospital, he can give an assurance that the extension of Llandough Hospital will not prejudice the building of the proposed new teaching hospital in Cardiff.
Work is in progress on a new maternity unit of 87 beds at the Royal Infirmary but no extension is at present contemplated at Llandough. This will not prejudice the proposals for a new teaching hospital.
Since the extension of Llandough is possibly less expensive than other proposals, would it interfere with the proposed new teaching hospital?
No, Sir.
Spectacles
13.
asked the Minister of Health the average length of time taken for the supply of spectacles under the National Health Service Act from date of application to date of delivery.
An average figure is not available. With the exception of certain complicated lenses most glasses can now be supplied with very little delay.
Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that, while the production of spectacles has been speeded up in recent months, the bottleneck now appears to be in the arrival of the form authorising the manufacturer to deliver to the applicant; and will he try to shake up his Department after the recent lax administration?
I am assured that the period between the date of the order for spectacles placed by the optician with the manufacturer and the date of delivery is now only about one week.
Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that I have been waiting for two months?
18.
asked the Minister of Health if he is aware that Mr. Horace Graydon, Morecambe, has been waiting 21 months for his spectacles, that now he has got them they are no good because he has meantime become partially blind through cataract; and if he will make sure that Mr. Graydon now gets the appropriate spectacles quickly.
Mr. Graydon was supplied on 18th January with spectacles which, he states, are quite satisfactory.
I am very glad of that, but will the Minister arrange some method for dealing with complaints of this kind so that people can get satisfaction quickly without the necessity for intervention by a Member of Parliament?
Yes, Sir. The spectacles, as I am sure the hon. Gentleman knows, were of a very special kind—bifocal glasses with Crooks A.I. tints—but now that the back of the other problem—the supply of the general type of glasses—is obviously broken, there should be less delay in the supply of these special glasses.
Would the Minister give particular attention to this question of the long delay in delivery of spectacles, especially in view of the recent activities of his colleague the Minister of Food?
Diphtheria Immunisation
16.
asked the Minister of Health in what year the practice of immunisation against diphtheria became general; and how the notifications and deaths in the previous year compare with the latest year for which the statistics are available.
The diphtheria immunisation scheme sponsored by my Department began in 1941. Notifications and deaths in 1940 numbered respectively 46,281 and 2,480. In 1949 they were 1,881 and 84.
Would the right hon. Gentleman be good enough to send a copy of his answer to the various anti-vaccination and anti-vivisection societies?
Capital Works, Birmingham
17.
asked the Minister of Health what allocations of money have been made for capital developments to the various hospital management committees in the Birmingham Regional Hospital Board; and what is the average population served by each of these hospital management committees.
Capital works are the responsibility of the regional board and no allocations have been made to individual committees.
Death, Urmston (Inquiry)
20.
asked the Minister of Health if he has now received the report of the regional hospital board upon the circumstances preceding the death of Charles Walker who was found dying outside a lonely hut in Urmston meadows to which he had been returned after being refused admission to Park Hospital, Davyhulme, because he was not sufficiently ill, and to a welfare hostel at An-coats because he was too ill; and the steps taken by his Department to secure a more realistic liaison between the National Health Service and those responsible for the administration of National Assistance and the Vagrancy Acts.
Inquiries are not yet complete, but a preliminary report suggests that the failure was not one of liaison between services but of judgment on the part of certain officers. I will make a statement when I have a full report.
Why has it taken so long to get the report? The West Manchester Hospital Committee held an inquiry on 30th December and issued a report to the public. Why does the right hon. Gentleman's Department take so long to get down to this very serious matter?
Because the question of possible failure of diagnosis obviously needs to be considered very carefully.
Regulations (Corrigenda)
21.
asked the Minister of Health whether he is aware of the waste of paper and labour entailed in the dispatch of corrigenda to regulations issued by his Department relating to unimportant details; and if he will cause this practice to stop.
I am not aware that there is any such waste.
Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that the following corrigendum was issued quite recently under the heading "Capital and Maintenance Works and Expenditure":
Is he further aware that in the case of the Worthing Hospital Management Committee one copy of this corrigendum was sent to each member, numbering 24? If that happens all over the country is it not a fantastic waste of paper and labour?"Page 2, paragraph 3 (iii), line 4, delete semi-colon after 'sterilising'"?
I hope not. I expect that it is one of those matters where the lawyers insist on accuracy of punctuation.
Will the right hon. Gentleman agree that these corrigenda have no statutory authority whatsoever?
I should require notice of that question.
Is my right hon. Friend aware of the very great appreciation of the population of the country of the National Health Service, and their impatience with this niggling kind of Question?
Physiotherapists (Report)
26.
asked the Minister of Health whether he will made a statement on the report which he has received from the Committee on the Supply and Demand, Training and Qualifications of Physiotherapists in the National Health Service.
No, Sir; I am not yet ready to do so. I wish to study the Report more fully.
Can my right hon. Friend say when he expects his study to be completed?
It must at any rate take some weeks.
Heroin
27.
asked the Minister of Health what quantity of heroin was used in the United Kingdom in 1950, compared with 1938; and to what causes he ascribes the difference.
The quantity in 1938 was 46 kilos, and in 1949 it was 136 kilos. Figures are not yet available for 1950. Diamorphine is widely used in this country as an ingredient for cough-linctus. A rise in consumption can, therefore, be attributed in part to medicinal use under the National Health Service.
Is the Minister satisfied that that increase is due to an increase in medicinal use?
I am only able to reply to that part of the Question which concerns me. Other questions would more properly be referred to my right hon. Friend the Home Secretary.
Franchise (Mental Disability)
29.
asked the Minister of Health on what grounds he has decided to extend the franchise to certified lunatics.
The franchise has not been extended. The law is, and has been for many years, that, apart from idiots, a person suffering from any form of mental disability, if on the electoral register, is entitled to vote if he presents himself at the appropriate polling station and satisfies the presiding officer as to his capacity to do so.
Voluntary Hospital Benefactors (Covenants)
32.
asked the Minister of Health if he will identify the powers by which he has instructed benefactors under covenant of voluntary hospitals to pay instalments to him; if he will publish in the OFFICIAL REPORT a copy of his demand for such payment; and if he will refrain from enforcing such claims in the courts.
The powers are contained in Section 7 of the National Health Service Act, 1946. I will circulate a copy of the letter in the OFFICIAL REPORT. I am advised that a person who executed a deed of covenant has himself no power to cancel it; and I hope, therefore, that action in the courts to enforce compliance will not become necessary.
As this is grossly unfair, will the Minister introduce amending legislation to relieve benefactors of voluntary hospitals from any liability?
I should have thought that this gives the opportunity that hon. Members opposite and many on this side of the House think is desirable of associating voluntary effort with the work of the hospital service.
Does not the Minister recognise that these gifts were made to an individual hospital and were not made to any group that the Minister may select? Does he not realise that it is grossly unfair to have done what his Department have done?
The House of Commons discussed the National Health Service Bill very thoroughly and passed the Act in the form in which it now stands. It is my duty to administer it.
Following is the letter:
I have to communicate with you regarding the deed of covenant under which you convenanted on the to contribute the sum of £ for seven years to the above hospital. Under the provisions of the National Health Service Act, 1945, the sums formerly payable under such a deed ceased to be payable to the hospital concerned and became payable to the Minister of Health to be credited, with other hospital endowments, to the Hospital Endowments Fund, a fund set up under the Act. The income from the fund (including payments made under covenants) is distributed to regional hospital boards and hospital management committees to be used by them as they think fit on hospital services such as, for example, the provision of amenities for patients and staff, or for medical and other research, beyond the provision made by the State.
In these circumstances, I have to ask that you will be good enough to arrange for payments under the deed entered into by you to be remitted annually to the Secretary, Ministry of Health, Whitehall, London, S.W.1, quoting the above reference number. Any payments which may have been made to the hospital since 5.7.1948 have already been credited to the fund. The remittances (whether made directly to this office or by means of a banker's order) should he made payable to the "Minister of Health Hospital Endowments Fund" and crossed "Bank of England."
Patient (Hospital Fees)
33.
asked the Minister of Health if he will reconsider the case of Mr. F. W. Harris, 40, Uffington Road, West Norwood, who is now being taken to court by the hospital authorities for payment of fees amounting to £85 1s. in view of the fact that when advised by his doctor that his wife must have an immediate emergency operation, he took a semi-private bed for her in King's College Hospital as no public bed was available.
No, Sir. My information is that Mr. Harris asked his doctors to obtain a bed at King's College Hospital and accepted a bed in a semiprivate ward on being told that no bed in a general ward at that hospital was available. I have no power under the National Health Service Act to reimburse the cost of arrangements entered into privately.
Should there not be some room for humanity and elasticity in the operation of the Health Service? Would the Minister realise the state of mind of my constituent who was told that his wife would die within an hour if she could not have an emergency operation? Would not any one of us have signed any form for any bed rather than let his wife die?
I must tell the hon. and gallant Gentleman that my information does not appear to coincide precisely with his. If he would like to come to see me about it, I will explain the position.
If the inference in the Question was correct, that it was an immediate emergency, would the Minister say why a public free bed was not available in private accommodation, as the Act provides?
The situation was that a private bed was asked for, and because it was asked for specially at that particular hospital no application was made to the free bed roll. I am satisfied that the officer concerned had every reason to believe that it was a private bed at King's College Hospital which the gentleman concerned required for his wife.
Would it not be far better to abolish private beds in hospitals altogether?
Would the Minister realise that I have been most carefully into this case with the doctor and my constituent? The doctor assures me that he wanted to perform an emergency operation at the hospital. He rang up the hospital for any bed. They replied that there was no public bed, but that they could make available a semi-private bed. I am satisfied that those were the facts of the case.
I do not for a moment doubt that the hon. and gallant Gentleman made the best inquiries he could. He must accept that I did the same.
General Practitioners
35.
asked the Minister of Health what is the total number of general practitioners in practice at the latest convenient date.
The number of general practitioners on the medical list in the National Health Service in England and Wales on 1st July, 1950, was 18,710. I have no information about those in private practice.
Cost Of Living (Committee)
36.
asked the Minister of Labour how many meetings of the Cost-of-Living Advisory Committee have taken place since 16th December; on what dates they were held; and if he has a further statement to make on the data upon which the Interim Cost-of-Living Index is based.
Nominations have now been received from the various organisations represented on the Cost-of-Living Advisory Committee. The first meeting of the committee will take place on Wednesday, 7th February.
While we are grateful to the Minister for having started this Committee, may I ask if he will bear in mind that his predecessor promised to do this over a period of three years and that nothing has been done? Since millions of wages depend on this index, and since the workers do not feel that it reflects the true cost of living, will the Minister hasten matters?
The committee having I been appointed, it is now for them to do their work in their own way. This is a very complicated matter.
Dock Labour Board (Chairmanship)
37.
asked the Minister of Labour why he did not reappoint Lord Ammon as chairman of the National Dock Labour Board for next year.
I would refer the hon. Member to the reply given to the hon. Member for Devizes (Mr. Hollis) on 12th December.
Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that in this case the usual procedure of consultation with the national joint council of the industry did not take place? Is he further aware, from the published statement of the noble Lord, that this old servant of the State has been left with the feeling that both the matter and the manner of his dismissal were highly derogatory to him?
About the first part of that supplementary question, I will make inquiries. As to the second part, it is really not usual to give explanations as to why persons in these positions are not re-appointed; indeed in some instances—not in this particular instance—it might be painful if they were given.
Has my right hon. Friend noted that he is criticised by the Opposition equally for appointing Socialists to boards and for not appointing Socialists to boards?
Does it follow from the right hon. Gentleman's refusal to give the grounds for this non-appointment that he accepts as substantially true the reasons given by the noble Lord himself?
No. But it is not the custom of any Government to give the House of Commons explanations of this kind, which, in many circumstances, might be extremely embarrassing.
Employment
Kent
38.
asked the Minister of Labour what steps he is taking to find jobs for the many men and women unemployed in areas of Kent owing to the shortage of tinplate in canning factories.
The normal machinery of the employment exchange service is available to any workers becoming redundant in the Kent canning factories if they register for employment, and the exchanges will give all possible help to them.
Does not the Minister consider that it would be far better to stop exporting tinplate so that he would not have to take action? We have had a coal crisis through exporting coal; now we are having a tin crisis.
There would have been a very much smaller tin crisis in Great Britain if tin making plants had been built before the war.
Elderly Workers (Earnings)
39.
asked the Minister of Labour whether, in view of the desirability of ensuring maximum production in the present emergency, he will investigate the extent to which it would be possible to employ a greater proportion of men who now cease work at 65 years of age, owing to the fact that they are not allowed to draw their full pension if they are in receipt of earnings over 20s. a week.
I am in consultation with both sides of industry on the means to extend the employment of elderly workers. While not accepting the hon. Member's suggestion about the effect of the earnings rule, one of the subjects on which the advice of industry is being sought is the effect of the present insurance arrangements generally on the attitude of employers and workers to employment beyond the ages of 60 and 65 for women and men respectively.
Is the right hon. Gentlemen not aware that there has been a growing demand, for quite a long time, that this figure of 20s. should be altered, because it is keeping a lot of men from industry? Is he not aware that the demand comes from the men themselves who would otherwise go into industry?
As I have said, we are having an inquiry made now and I have already consulted the two sides of industry, as hon. Members may have seen in the Press.
Will the right hon. Gentleman celebrate his new appointment by seeing that a better example is set by his own Department in employing those over 60?
We shall, of course, have to consider the whole range of employment here, because it is one of those instances where the conventions of society have to be adjusted to the realities of modern conditions.
Will the Minister do his utmost to bring both sides of the industry to a realisation of the urgency of this problem in view of the fact that this difficulty has persisted for a very long time and that it is felt neither side of the industry is whole-heartedly in favour of speeding up the matter?
I have already done so.
Southend-On-Sea
40.
asked the Minister of Labour how many people were registered as unemployed in the county borough of Southend-on-Sea at the latest available date.
One thousand nine hundred and ninety-six at 15th January.
Is the Minister aware that many of the people whom he has mentioned, and many more whom he has not mentioned, will be added to the list of the unemployed of Southend-on-Sea unless and until he can prevail upon his colleague the Minister of Transport to provide means for taking people from Southend-on-Sea to London at a speed rather faster than that of the old pack mule?
The difficulty is seasonal, but there has been a very substantial improvement in the situation, as I am quite sure the hon. Gentleman will realise and be pleased about. The number in 1939 was 6,370.
In view of the unsatisfactory and evasive nature of the reply, I give notice that it is my intention to raise this matter at the earliest possible opportunity on the Adjournment.
Remploy Factory, Southampton
41.
asked the Minister of Labour how many disabled men are employed at the Southampton Remploy factory; how far it is possible to increase the number; and whether the number of occupations there may be increased.
Forty-one severely disabled persons are employed at the Southampton Remploy factory, which has a capacity of about 50 places. The factory is engaged in the manufacture of knitted goods, for which there is a steady and increasing demand. While that position lasts, I understand that Remploy Ltd. think it better not to change over to other lines of production.
Is my right hon. Friend aware that there is a great shortage of jobs for disabled unemployed in Southampton, and that many of the disabled men are unsuited to the single type of work which is carried on in this factory?
I will make investigations.
Is there any possibility of a second Remploy factory being established at Southampton?
I think it would be very difficult to add to the number at the moment, but I will certainly investigate the matter.
Blacksmiths (Rural Areas)
42.
asked the Minister of Labour whether he will grant postponement of National Service to blacksmiths in rural areas in the same way as he does to agricultural workers; and how many men he estimates would be affected by such a course.
It has been the practice to allow deferment of call-up to rural craftsmen, such as blacksmiths, in exceptional instances where the withdrawal of their services would seriously interfere with food production. In view of the manpower needs of the Services I am not in a position to extend the scope of these arrangements. I am unable to estimate the numbers involved.
Would the right hon. Gentleman define what he means by "exceptional instances," in view of the fact that farmers depend very largely for the repair of their farm machinery on the services of blacksmiths?
I suppose that the instances would be in very remote districts where alternative sources would not be available; but, although farming is dependent on these arrangements there are other industries which also depend on definitions of this kind.
Shipyards (Overtime)
43.
asked the Minister of Labour if he is aware that 25,000 men of Merseyside engineering and shipbuilding unions refuse to work overtime until their wage increase is determined; and what steps he is taking to bring about a wage settlement.
44.
asked the Minister of Labour if he will make a statement regarding the ban imposed on overtime working in shipyards on Merseyside and elsewhere; and if he will make every effort to see that a settlement is reached and overtime working resumed.
71.
asked the Minister of Labour what action he proposes to take to remove the ban on overtime working in Merseyside shipyards.
Some difficulty has arisen in ship repairing establishments on Merseyside in regard to the local application of the recent National Wages Agreement for the shipbuilding and ship-repairing industry. This agreement provides that any questions in regard to the interpretation or application of the agreement shall be dealt with through the recognised industry procedure, and it is clear, therefore, that there is adequate machinery for dealing with this difficulty without recourse to unconstitutional action. Meetings have taken place between the official parties concerned in the district, and if these local discussions are unable to resolve the difficulty, the matter should then be referred, under the agreed procedure, to the national machinery of the industry. The effect of the ban on overtime is not yet clear.
Is the Minister aware that these negotiations have been prolonged for a long time, that the men have been very much dissatisfied, and that I am anxious to know whether he would intervene at the earliest opportunity? Would he meet both sides in Liverpool in order to bring about settlement and ease the crisis'?
I am watching the position, but it would not be wise for the Ministry of Labour to intervene in the place of the recognised machinery for negotiation.
Has the Minister's attention been called to the reported statements of the leader of the movement on Merseyside, who is an avowed Communist, that this ban will continue whatever the emergency? In view of the gravity of the Prime Minister's statement on Monday, will he realise how important it is to get an immediate settlement, and to prevent a recurrence?
I should have thought that the statements made by this person would undoubtedly have affected his relationship with the men he is misleading.
Would the Minister take every step to impress on all sides the necessity of honouring agreements freely entered into as being the basis of all collective bargaining?
That is the reason why we are not prepared to intervene when the ordinary machinery of negotiation has yet to be used.
Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that, whatever the merits or demerits of the men's case may be, this ban on overtime has been instigated by a small Communist minority which is not interested in the welfare of the men, but in the welfare of a foreign State?
It is not always wise to interpret these acts in that way. It exalts the influence of the Communists in a most extraordinary fashion—[An HON. MEMBER: "Whose side is the right hon. Gentleman on?"]—to suggest always that they are responsible.
Is the right hon. Gentleman aware how reminiscent his replies are of those made at the beginning of the London dock strike, which dragged on for a very long time and, in the end, had to be settled by the Ministry?
I cannot vouch for the accuracy of the reminiscences of the hon. Member.
rose—
I do not think these questions are helping to settle the dispute.
Festival Of Britain
45.
asked the Lord President of the Council when he expects to be able to announce the result of the consultations between the Festival of Britain office and the Railway Executive regarding train services in connection with the Festival.
I have been asked to reply. My right hon. Friend would refer the hon. Member to his previous answer to his Question on 17th October, 1950. British Railways are themselves announcing, from time to time, details of all arrangements in connection with the Festival of Britain.
Could the right hon. Gentleman do anything to hurry a decision up, because towns like Tunbridge Wells, and many seaside towns, will try to act as dormitories for London at the Festival, but do not yet know what extra late trains will be run?
I will draw the attention of the railway authorities to the hon. Member's Question.
Will the right hon. Gentleman inquire whether, before consideration is given to this matter, the recently made cuts in normal passenger services will be restored?
Anti-Communist Books
46.
asked the Lord President of the Council whether, in view of the large numbers of subsidised books and pamphlets giving the Communist point of view, he will facilitate the production of cheap editions of books which give the other point of view.
I have been asked to reply. No, Sir, my right hon. Friend has no reason to suppose that any special facilities are required.
Is the right hon. Gentleman familiar with the book which is called "A History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks)," which is described inside as a short course, is printed and published in Moscow, and is, I understand, a textbook of the workers of the Communist Party, and sells in this country for Is. 6d.? [An HON. MEMBER: "Has the noble Lord read it?"] Yes. Could we not encourage and facilitate the publication of books which put the other point of view, such as "The Coming Defeat of Communism" by James Burnham?
I am not aware of the book that the noble Lord mentions, and I do not intend to waste my time reading it—even if he presented me with it. However, think that this matter is best left to private organisations, because I am quite certain that any State subsidised propaganda would be regarded with the very greatest suspicion.
Agriculture
Volunteer Workers (Travel Concessions)
47.
asked the Minister of Agriculture what was the total cost of travel concessions made in 1950 in connection with volunteers for harvesting; and what number of persons benefited.
The cost of the travel concessions to volunteers attending volunteer agricultural camps in October and November, 1950, was £22,280; 14,149 persons qualified for the concessions and they did 26,952 weeks' work.
Will the Minister say whether it is the principle of this scheme that voluntary labour is employed as near the source of work as possible?
That is what we always try to achieve.
Horses (Transport)
48.
asked the Minister of Agriculture what steps he is taking to prevent the overloading and resultant suffering of horses on transport for slaughtering.
53.
asked the Minister of Agriculture whether he is satisfied with the arrangements for the transport and accommodation of horses imported from Ireland for food purposes.
The Departmental Committee on the Export and Slaughter of Horses recommended last year that certain additional measures should be taken to protect horses against suffering while being carried in rail and road vehicles. To give effect to these recommendations I propose to make an order under the Diseases of Animals Act, 1950. Consultations have been taking place with the other Departments and organisations concerned, and I expect to be in a position to make the Order at a very early date.
Can the Minister say why there has been such a long delay, because he made an almost exactly similar announcement in reply to a Question in the middle of December?
Because we have made what I thought was a wise decision to consult the various organisations concerned.
I did not hear much of my right hon. Friend's reply. Is he satisfied that the penalties provided by the law are sufficiently high to act as a deterrent against things we see happening, not only to horses that are for export but to horses in transport between points in this country? If not, will he strengthen them?
Yes, I think the penalties are sufficient if justices of the peace are not too lenient.
As this is concerned with diseases of animals can we assume that the Minister is covering the whole of the country?
I think the Secretary of State for Scotland has some power in Scotland, but I would not be too sure about that.
Fowl Pest
49.
asked the Minister of Agriculture how many fowls and how many turkeys have been destroyed as the result of the recent outbreak of fowl pest; what is the cost of compensation to date; and why they were not used for food.
From the beginning of last October to 27th January, about 140,000 fowls and 1,750 turkeys had been slaughtered as a result of outbreaks of fowl pest. Compensation amounts to about £172,000 for the fowls and £15,000 for the turkeys. It is probable that most of the birds that have been killed by direction of my Department were infected. To have permitted the carcases of those birds to have been disposed of for human consumption would have involved a grave risk of the spread of disease to other flocks.
Is the Minister aware that I am informed by poultry breeders that hundreds of birds were killed which were not infected? If they were killed, will he say why they were not used for human consumption?
I answered the last part of the supplementary question in my original reply. This policy is adopted on the advice of my veterinary experts.
Will not the Minister try one of these fowls on the hon. Member for Orpington (Sir W. Smithers)?
56.
asked the Minister of Agriculture how many fowl have been slaughtered in Worcestershire since 1st December, 1950, under direction of his Department's officers, as a result of the United States virus type of fowl pest; how many cases have been detected; and what is the total sum payable by his Department in compensation.
So far, there has been one outbreak of the sub-acute type of fowl pest in Worcestershire. Fifty fowls were slaughtered, and the sum payable as compensation amounts to £219.
Is the Minister aware that this case involved the slaughter of very valuable pedigree poultry as the result of a blood test taken by his officer? Can he assure the House that the positive result of a blood test is an infallible means of establishing that the bird is infected and is a carrier of this mild form of disease?
I assure the hon. Member, on the advice of my chief veterinary officer and veterinary staff, that this is the best possible method of dealing with outbreaks of fowl pest. I should deprecate any amateur, whether for political or other reasons, attempting to overrule this.
58.
asked the Minister of Agriculture the extent to which fowl pest is prevalent in Cheshire; and what steps are being taken to stop the spread of this disease.
Since 1st October there have been seven outbreaks of fowl pest in Cheshire, of which six were in January. With regard to the second part of the Question, I would refer the hon. and gallant Member to the statement printed in column 306 of the OFFICIAL REPORT for 25th January.
How long will it be before claims are settled by the right hon. Gentleman's Department?
I could not say without notice.
This should be greatly speeded up.
Farms, Kent (Supervision Orders)
50.
asked the Minister of Agriculture how many supervision orders respecting farms in Kent are operating at the present time.
Fifty-three supervision orders for husbandry and one for estate management.
Can the Minister say how Kent compares with other counties?
I cannot.
51.
asked the Minister of Agriculture how many occupiers in Kent have been dispossessed of their farms because of bad husbandry or bad estate management since the Agricultural Act, 1947, became operative.
Two occupiers have been dispossessed, both on the grounds of bad husbandry.
County Committees (Report)
52.
asked the Minister of Agriculture if he has yet received the report of the Ryan Committee, which inquired into the organisation of his Department in relation to the county agricultural executive committees; and when this will be published.
No, Sir. I understand it is to be submitted in about three weeks' time. I will consider the question of publishing the report when I have had an opportunity of studying it.