Skip to main content

Civil Defence (Dispersal Of Population)

Volume 657: debated on Wednesday 4 April 1962

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

17.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what steps he is taking to increase the rate of house building and school building in the areas designated as reception areas under his dispersal plans; and if he proposes to give additional subsidies to local authorities in the areas to provide accommodation for the additional population.

No special steps are being taken, and no additional subsidies are proposed because of designation under the dispersal scheme.

If the Minister has plans for dispersing the population to areas which are already overcrowded, does not he think that he should make some provision?

No, Sir. I do not think so. It is perfectly obvious that in an emergency we will have to put up with conditions which perhaps are not those which we should like to have in ordinary times.

18.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland to what extent the towns of Ayr and Prestwick and the towns on the Firth of Clyde have been designated as neutral or reception areas under the new plans for the dispersal of the population in the event of nuclear war.

The towns of Ayr and Prestwick and the other towns on the Ayrshire coast have been designated as reception areas. Cove and Kilcreg-gan, Dunoon, Gourock and Rothesay are neutral areas.

When the Polaris submarine base came to Dunoon we were told by the commander of the "Proteus" that Dunoon was perfectly safe. Can the Minister tell us why the Government do not now regard Dunoon as such a safe area, and also will he tell us why he is proposing to make Prestwick a reception area when it is one of the most important American bases in Britain?

The intention is to disperse people from the large industrial areas. I think that the coast of Ayr, near which I live myself, is completely safe.

Will the Minister tell the House why his right hon. Friend who, apparently, is pledged to a policy of dispersal—though we cannot see how it is to take place—is retaining all the shelters in tenement properties in the densely populated areas in Glasgow?

Can the Minister say whether this is a new policy of civil defence which we are hearing about today, and whether a place which provides a number one target should be designated as a reception area? If so, will the hon. Gentleman offer some advice to his right hon. Friend the Home Secretary about designating air bases in the Norfolk area as reception areas also?