The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.
66.
Mr. Loveys
asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government whether he will take steps, by legislation or other-
Type of Advertisement | Dealt with by:— | Total | |||||||
Total of appeals decided | Public Local Inquiry | Accompanied Visit | Correspondence | ||||||
Allowed | Dismissed | Allowed | Dismissed | Allowed | Dismissed | Allowed | Dismissed | ||
Posters—below 16- | 375 | — | — | 15 | 114 | 33 | 213 | 48 | 327 |
sheet size | (81) | (4) | (15) | (10) | (52) | (14) | (67) | ||
Posters—16-sheet and larger | 891 | — | — | 34 | 212 | 81 | 564 | 115 | 776 |
Illuminated trade signs | 613 | 2 | 4 | 51 | 97 | 198 | 261 | 251 | 362 |
Un illuminated trade signs | 297 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 110 | 31 | 133 | 50 | 247 |
Totals | 2,176 | 5 | 8 | 116 | 533 | 343 | 1,171 | 464 | 1,712 |
wise, to ensure that developers who use private roads to reach adjacent areas where development is taking place are made responsible for damage caused to the private roads, and so ensure that this matter is not left to voluntary agreements which are unsatisfactory and cause hardship to local residents.
Mr. MacColl
No. Such a responsibility would be impracticable to enforce. When a private street becomes heavily used, either by developers' vehicles or other traffic, there may well be a case for getting it made up and adopted under the appropriate Private Street Works code. But this is a matter for the local authority in the area.