Oral Contraceptives
43.
asked the Minister of Health whether he will now introduce legislation to make oral contraceptives available on the National Health Service on social as well as medical grounds, as it is becoming impossible for voluntary organisations such as the Family Planning Association to deal with this growing need.
As the hon. Member is aware, a Bill to extend the powers of local health authorities in relation to family planning has been introduced by my hon. Friend the Member for Bebington (Mr. Brooks).
I would not, however, think it right that contraceptives supplied on social grounds should be provided without charge.Cannot the Minister go a little further than that? On 19th May, at a national conference, he left the impression with delegates that he was more than sympathetic with this. In view of that, could he not take some action?
I do not know what the hon. Gentleman says that I was sympathetic about. I was certainly sympathetic with the aims and the objectives of the Family Planning Association, and the circular which I sent recently to local authorities encouraged them to extend their family planning advice services. That does not involve the supply of contraceptives free of charge.
Would not my right hon. Friend discourage the use of all oral contraceptives on both medical and social grounds, because considerable uncertainty still exists as to their freedom from dangerous side-effects?
No, Sir. The recent statement made on behalf of the Dunlop Committee did not suggest that oral contraceptives should be withdrawn from the public.
Is my right hon. Friend aware that some general practitioners require the written consent of husbands before prescribing the oral contraceptive pill to women patients? Will he issue a directive to general practitioners to stop that feudal practice?—[Interruption.]
I am not sure that that this is a matter for me. If my hon. Friend would like to put a Question on the Order Paper, I would be glad to consider it.
Can my right hon. Friend give an assurance that this will not be regarded by our critics as a split in the party?
Cigarette Advertising
49.
asked the Minister of Health if he will now make a statement on Her Majesty's Government's policy towards cigarette advertising in media other than television.
An agreement has been reached between the principal United Kingdom manufacturers and the Government for the limitation of expenditure on the advertising of cigarettes through Press and posters during the six months from 1st June, and for advertising in cinemas and on radio to cease on the expiry of existing contracts. The manufacturers have also agreed to undertake a review, jointly with the Government, of future levels of advertising in these media and of expenditure on coupon schemes with the aim of making comprehensive arrangements for limitation to come into operation on the expiry of the current six months period. An understanding has also been reached to restrict the distribution of free samples.
Whilst thanking my right hon. Friend for that Answer, may I ask whether he can estimate how far the agreed levels which he has announced today will compare with the previous level of cigarette advertising?
Without wishing to disclose the actual figures, I can assure my hon. Friend that it is at a rate considerably below the total advertising expenditure before the ban on advertisements on television.
As this matter is of very wide general interest, and all hon. Members would like to know them, is there no means of giving in outline a greater degree of information about the nature of the arrangements than the right hon. Gentleman was able to do in his Answer? Will they not be published?
If the right hon. Gentleman would like further information, perhaps he would put down a Question on the Order Paper. He will appreciate that there are commercial considerations involved in this matter as between firm and firm.
While welcoming the Minister's announcement, may I ask him to consider in the future completely banning advertisements for cigarettes, because the quite frightening death rate from cancer of the lung in this country is the largest public health problem that we are facing today?
I certainly agree with my hon. Friend that it is a very serious problem, but here we have been able to achieve a voluntary agreement by the manufacturers, and I would prefer to try to build on that for the present.
Will the right hon. Gentleman in due course give the House the effect which the ban has had on sales of cigarettes?
I do not know to which ban the hon. Gentleman is referring.
Would the right hon. Gentleman bear in mind that, while carcinogenic elements in cigarette smoke may be a largely contributory factor to the increase in lung cancer, so long as the country continues to pollute its atmosphere as freely as it does, we cannot expect a diminution in the number of deaths?
I think that that is another question. Whether or not the hon. Lady is right, it ought not to affect our efforts to reduce the consumption of cigarettes.