Skip to main content

Licensing Laws

Volume 888: debated on Monday 10 March 1975

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will now take steps to implement such recommendations of the Erroll and Clayson Committees with regard to licensing that he regards as non-controversial.

The Erroll Committee made a number of useful recommendations for rationalising and simplifying licensing procedures which I should;

PROJECTS APPROVED FOR MANCHESTER UNDER THE URBAN PROGRAMME Manchester County Borough (1969–74)
Cost at time of approval£
Circular No. 1 (Approvals January 1969)
Capital
1.Nursery class, Plymouth Grove5,000
2.Nursery class, Claremont5,000
3.Nursery class, St. Joseph's9,385
4.Nursery class, Grimsworth9,385
5. Nursery class, Our Lady9,385
6. Nursery class, St. Mark's9,385
7. Nursery class, St. Thomas'3,500
8. Nursery class, St. Augustine's500
9.Nursery class, St. Margaret's 8,700
10.Nursery class, St. Robert's5,700
11. Nursery class, Stanley Grove9,385
12. Nursery class, St. Francis9,385
13. Nursery class, Heald Place5,700
14. Day Nursery, Longhurst Road51,500
15. Hostel for working girls54,000

expect to be relatively non-controversial. but, as a matter of legislative priority, I cannot say when it will be possible to give effect to them. The recommendations of the Clayson Committee are a matter for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Scotland.