Skip to main content

Mail Services

Volume 918: debated on Tuesday 2 November 1976

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

I beg to ask leave to move the Adjournment of the House, under Standing Order No. 9, for the purpose of discussing a specific, urgent and important matter which should have precedence over other business; namely

"the interference with the delivery of Her Majesty's mails".
I apologise for not giving you notice earlier in the day, Mr. Speaker, but I could not do so because the matter was not public knowledge until the Private Notice Question raised by my hon. Friend the Member for Hendon, North (Mr. Gorst).

I submit that this is a very specific matter because it refers to the circumstances surrounding the holding up of mail in pursuit of an industrial dispute. That is how my hon. Friend described the circumstances, and this was confirmed as accurate by the Minister of State for Employment.

It is an important matter because the carriage of mail is a State monopoly, and it is a service which is vital to the continuance of the social, industrial, and commercial life of this country.

It is urgent because this is a great abuse and the longer it is allowed to continue without the House debating it and reaching a conclusion about what should be done, the more difficult it will be to uproot and destroy such abuses.

The hon. Member asks leave to move the Adjournment of the House for the purpose of discussing a specific and important matter which he thinks should have urgent consideration, namely

"the interference with the delivery of Her Majesty's mails".
As he knows, under Standing Order No. 9 I am directed to take into account the several factors set out in the Order but to give no reasons for my decision. I do not have to rule on the importance of the question or whether it should be debated, but only whether it should have precedence over all other business.

I have given careful consideration to the representations by the hon. Member, but I have to rule that his submission does not fall within the provisions of the Standing Order, and therefore I cannot submit his application to the House.

Business Of The House

Ordered,

That, at this day's Sitting, Standing Order No. 4 shall not apply to the Motions relating to Poultry Meat (Hygiene) Regulations 1976 (S.I., 1976, No. 1209) and Poultry Meat (Hygiene) (Scotland) Regulations 1976 (S.I., 1976, No. 1221), but that the said Motions may be proceeded with, though opposed, until half-past Eleven o'clock or for one and a half hours after they have been entered upon, whichever is the later, and if such Motions are then under consideration Mr. Speaker shall forthwith put any Question which may he requisite to bring to a decision any Question already proposed from the Chair.—[Mr. Coleman.]