asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will list applications for open-cast coalmining made to him by the National Coal Board since the beginning of 1974 which were the subject of objections, indicating in each case (a) his decision to approve or refuse the application, (b) whether or not his decision overturned the recommendations made to him by the public inquiry inspector, (c) whether the county planning authority supported or opposed the application at the public inquiry and (d) how many acres of land in agricultural use were directly affected.
The information is as follows:
Authorisation granted where Inspector:— | Authorisation refused where Inspector
| County planning authority
| ||||||||||
Recommended
| Male no recommendation
| recommended refusal
| opposed application
| Acreage of agricultural land involved
| ||||||||
Stie
| Location
| authorisaiton
| Refusal
| |||||||||
Butterwell | … | … | … | Northumberland | … | … | × | × | 2,035 | |||
Mitchesons Gill | … | … | … | Tyne and Wear | … | … | × | × | 86 | |||
Medomsley | … | … | … | Durham | … | … | × | × | 350 | |||
Hirwaun Common North II | … | Glamorgan | … | … | × | × | 62 | |||||
West Brandon/Standalone | … | Durham | … | … | × | 210 | ||||||
Glyn Glas South E×tension | … | Dyfed | … | … | ×* | × | 111 | |||||
Tan Pit Slip | … | … | … | Greater Manchester | … | … | × | × | 53 | |||
Horsegate | … | … | … | Tyne and Wear | … | … | × | × | 182 | |||
Cawker | … | … | … | South Yorkshire, West Yorkshire | ×* | 213 | ||||||
Crosstree Farm | … | … | … | Clwyd | … | … | × | × | 140 | |||
Ellerbeck | … | … | … | Lancashire | … | … | × | × | 128 | |||
Deborah | … | … | … | Durham | … | … | × | × | 220 | |||
Oughterside | … | … | … | Cumbria | … | … | × | × | 524 | |||
Millers Lane | … | … | … | Greater Manchester | … | … | ×* | × | 150 | |||
Gamblethorpe | … | … | … | West Yorkshire | … | … | × | 128 | ||||
Togston | … | … | … | Northumberland | … | … | × | × | 578 | |||
Whittonstall | … | … | … | Northumberland | … | … | × | × | 446 | |||
NOTES: | ||||||||||||
1. The application was not supported by the county planning authority in any of these opposed cases. | ||||||||||||
2.* Significant modification of the site boundary was made in these cases in accordance with the inspector's suggestion. |