asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what are the latest estimates for the cost of reducing the retirement age for men to 64, 63, 62, 61 and 60 years, respectively.
On the assumption that the patern of retirement among men in the five years following the new pension ages would be the same as the present pattern amongst men aged 65 to 70 and that two-thirds(1) of the jobs vacated by men in employment retiring earlier were filled by persons on the unemployment register, the net cost of central Government funds in 1979–80, at average rates for the year, would be in the order of:
Reduction of age to | Cost £ million |
64 | 200 |
63 | 500 |
62 | 700 |
61 | 900 |
60 | 1,200 |
Reduction of age to | Cost £ million |
64 | 500 |
63 | 1,100 |
62 | 1,600 |
61 | 2,100 |
60 | 2,700 |
1 ) The figure of two-thirds has been assumed because not all retirements would create vacancies, and because some vacancies would not be filled, since there would be insufficient unemployed with the necessary qualifications in the right localities.