Skip to main content

Family Income Supplement

Volume 976: debated on Thursday 20 December 1979

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what will be the net effect of the extra £1 in family income supplement on a family also receiving rent rebate or allowance or rate rebate.

Depending upon the recipient's circumstances, rent rebate or allowance will in most cases be reduced by 25p or 17p, and rate rebate

NUMBERS OF STAFF IN POST
1 April 19741 April 19751 April 19761 April 19771 April 19781 April 1979
Milton keynes8671,1781,1461,1751,2431,317
Northampton289320361327334325
Peterborough583644772790796827
Central Lancashire170241324309368448
Telford7189679731,0541,1401,225
Warrington369456506538612642

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what was the administration cost for each of the third generation new towns for 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978 and for the latest 12 months.

The following table shows the costs of design and

ENGLISH THIRD GENERATION NEW TOWNS-DESIGN, MANAGEMENT AND OTHER ADMINISTRATION COSTS
1974–751975–761976–771977–781978–79
£000s£'000s£'000s£'000s£'000s
Central Lancashire—
Design and supervision investment programme1,2512,3902,1992,2853,207
Management of assets 3476109145195
Other expenditure185810889124
Total1,3032,5242,4162,5193,526
Milton Keynes—
Design etc4,8734,6796,2085,6087,135
Management of assets385550668775976
Other expenditure5163,0222,6073,4554,780
Total5,7748,2519,4839,83812,891
Northampton—
Design etc1,6562,0201,7781,4511,955
Management of assets163242324412475
Other expenditure155259498763745
Total1,9742,5212,6002,6263,175
Peterborough—
Design etc1,8993,0393,2772,9983,294
Management of assets201257418493545
Other expenditure2254136901,3461,699
Total2,3253,7094,3854,8375,538

by 8p or 6p, for each extra £1 of family income supplement received.