Skip to main content

Building Research Establishment

Volume 984: debated on Wednesday 7 May 1980

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will bring up to date the table of staffing of the Building Research Establishment given in the reply by the Under-Secretary of State for the Environment the hon. Member for Hampstead (Mr. Finsberg) on 17 July 1979; what is the current shortfall of staff in post compared with the authorised complement (a) overall and (b) in the science category; and what is the proposed staffing establishment for the current financial year.

The complement and staff in post figures are given below. The proposed complement is 811 for 1 April 1980, reducing to 789 by 1 April 1981, but this is subject to review in the light of the further manpower savings to be made in 1980–81 in connection with the recent Civil Service pay settlement. The shortfall of staff in post compared with complement at 1 April 1980 was 50 in the science group and 48 overall.

Complement 1 April 1980

Staff in post 1 April 1980

Administration Group
Principal11
SEO21
HEO77
EO1517
CO6866½
CA1712½
110105
Information Officers
Senior Information Officers11
Information Officers33
Assistant Information Officers22
66
Graphics Officers
Graphics Officer III12
Graphics Officer IV31
Drawing Office Assistant55
Tracer11
109
Personal Secretaries and Typists
Senior Personal Secretary11
Personal Secretary1920
Senior Superintendent of Typists11
Superintendent of Typists22
Typists2020
4344
Photographers
Chief Photographer11
Principal Photographer33
Senior Photographer68
Photographer2
Assistant Photographer1
1213
Other grades
Assistant Chief Photoprinter11
Photoprinter I33
Photoprinter II7
Senior Data Processor44
Data Processor1818
Trainee Data Processor
Paperkeeper1
Senior Messenger22
Messenger4
Telephonists66
Laboratory Attendant1
4648
Total811763

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will make a statement on the level of staff morale at the Building Research Establishment; and if he will take steps to improve it.

I visited the Building Research Establishment last February, when I had discussions with both senior management and the local staff side. I am mindful of the inevitable uncertainties which arise as the initial result of manpower reductions and the adverse effects that these can have on staff morale. BRE is not immune to this but I am confident of the staff's determination to continue to carry out high-quality work and also of senior management's commitment to maintaining BRE's reputation and creating conditions in which essential building and construction research can flourish.