Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 22: debated on Friday 30 April 1982

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Friday 30 April 1982

Trade

Estate Agencies

asked the Minister for Trade (1) if he will introduce legislation to prohibit commercial relationships between estate agencies and property companies in circumstances where partners of the former also have a major financial interest in the latter; and if he will make a statement;(2) if he will introduce legislation governing commercial relationships between estate agencies and property companies so that where partners of the former also have a major financial interest in the latter, such circumstances shall be made publicly known.

No. Under section 21 of the Estate Agents Act 1979, which comes into force on 3 May 1982, any person who is engaged in estate agency work and who has—or may acquire—a personal interest in a transaction must disclose that interest before entering into negotiations. Moreover, the Companies Acts require extensive disclosure of directorships and other interests in companies generally.

Land And Property Companies

asked the Minister for Trade if he will introduce legislation to ensure that land and property companies operating in the United. Kingdom shall, if registered abroad, be obliged to make public the names of their directors and major shareholders.

No. Companies which are incorporated outside Great Britain and which have a place of business within Great Britain are required, under section 407 of the Companies Act 1948, to deliver information to the Registrar of Companies including a list containing details of the directors of the company. This information is available for inspection by the public.

Companies (Bankruptcy Liabilities)

asked the Minister for Trade if he will carry out a study into methods of remedying the existing situation whereby companies operating in the United Kingdom, which are part or subsidiaries of companies registered in the Irish Republic, are able to avoid the payment of their United Kingdom liabilities if they suffer bankruptcy in Ireland.

I am not aware of a problem of the kind described, given the powers in the Companies Acts for the courts to wind up a foreign-based company. If the hon. Member has a particular point in mind perhaps he would write to me and I will undertake to look into the matter.

British Airways

asked the Minister for Trade if he will make a statement on the proposed reorganisation of British Airways and its implications for privatisation.

British Airways is to be split into three separate divisions: International Services, European Services, and Gatwick Services. These divisions will operate from 1 May 1982. Each division will have its own managing director, with its own annual budget and its own profit and loss account. There will also be further accountable profit centres within each of these divisions. There will still be common services in areas including engineering, ticket sales, personnel and cargo marketing, and the airline will continue to trade under one name.These important changes follow the steps already put in hand last autumn to reduce the work force by some 9,000 employees, and to cut out unprofitable routes and stations. These steps have been taken in order to make British Airways more efficient, more sensitive to the wishes of travellers, and more profitable, with a view to placing it in the private sector as soon as possible.

Estate Agents Act

asked the Minister for Trade (1) when he will bring into force the provisions of the Estate Agents Act requiring an agent who takes deposits, whether contract of pre-contract, to be insured;(2) when he will bring into force the provisions of section 18 of the Estate Agents Act;(3) when he will bring into force the provisions of the Estate Agents Act relating to the power to limit the size of pre-contract deposits;(4) when he will bring into force the provisions of the Estate Agents Act prescribing minimum standards of competence.

[pursuant to his reply, 29 April 1982, c. 312]: Section 18 of the Act will come into force on. 3 May 1982. Regulations under section 18(4) are not thought necessary at present. As to the other provisions mentioned, I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given to him by my right hon. Friend on 4 February 1982.—[Vol. 17, c. 170.]

Merchant Ships (Requisitioning)

asked the Minister for Trade whether procedures exist for requisitioning British-owned merchant ships now flying flags of convenience should they be needed in future to support military operations; and if he will set out such procedures in the Official Report.

[pursuant to his reply, 29 April 1982, c. 311]: There is a prerogative power to requisition in times of war or acute national emergency any merchant ship within United Kingdom jurisdiction. The Order in Council made on 4 April applies only to British ships—as defined in the order—though it does so whether or not they are within United Kingdom jurisdiction.

Redpath Dorman Long (Takeover)

asked the Minister for Trade when he expects the Director General of Fair Trading to report on the takeover of Redpath Dorman Long by Trafalgar House.

[pursuant to his reply, 29 April 1982, c. 312.]: The Director General's advice is expected in the near future.

Wales

Textiles And Clothing

asked the Secretary of State for Wales what financial aid was provided for the textile and clothing industries, respectively, by the Welsh Development Agency, the Development Corporation for Wales and the Development Board for Rural Wales during the most recent convenient year for which figures are available.

I have asked the Welsh Development Agency to provide my hon. Friend with details of the financial aid it has provided for the textile and clothing industries. The Development Corporation for Wales and the Development Board for Rural Wales do not provide direct financial assistance for industry.

Job Creation

asked the Secretary of State for Wales what further action he is taking to promote new employment in the Cardigan, Newcastle Emlyn, Llandyssul and Lampeter areas; and if he will make a statement.

The travel-to-work areas involved remain eligible for a wide range of Government schemes and initiatives designed to regenerate the economy and improve employment prospects. Development in the Cardigan and Lampeter-Llandyssul TTWAs includes 14 advance factories—totalling 28,500 sq ft—under construction or to be constructed in 1982–83.

Mid-Wales (Assisted Area Status)

asked the Secretary of State for Wales why the industry department of his office has

Reception into certain prisons in default of payment of a fine, 1 January to 30 June 1981
PrisonTotal Number of receptionsPercentage of those received aged under 21As a percentage of all receptions under sentence of imprisonment
Wandsworth101
Leeds1,2551938
Liverpool1,0412334
Birmingham9002139
Manchester9652534

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what proportion of fine defaulters received into (a) Wandsworth, (b) Leeds, (c) Liverpool, (d) Birmingham and (e) Manchester prisons in the last six months for which figures are available were unemployed.

The information requested is not recorded centrally. already implemented a decision to downgrade the assisted area status of Mid-Wales through stating that all applications for special financial assistance must be received by 30 April 1982 and that officers of his Department will not attend meetings to discuss projects after this date.

I refer the hon. Member to the reply which my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Department of Industry gave to the hon. Member for Enfield, North (Mr. Eggar) on 2 April 1982—[Vol. 21, c. 199]—in which the Government's reasons for introducing a cut-off date were explained. My hon. Friend made it clear that the introduction of these arrangements was without prejudice to the further review of those areas in Great Britain which are due to be downgraded on 1 August 1982.

Home Department

Fine Defaulters

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what proportion of convicted prisoners received into (a) Wandsworth, (b) Leeds, (c) Liverpool, (d) Birmingham and (e) Manchester prisons in the last six months for which figures are available were fine defaulters;(2) how many fine defaulters were received into

(a) Wandsworth, (b) Leeds, (c) Liverpool, (d) Birmingham and (e) Manchester prisons in the last six months for which figures are available;

(3) what proportion of fine defaulters received into (a) Wandsworth, (b) Leeds, (c) Liverpool, (d) Birmingham, and (e) Manchester prisons in the last six months for which figures are available were under 21 years of age.

The latest readily available information is given in the following table.

Civil Defence Network (Rhydymwyn)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what consideration he has given to Rhydymwyn as a sub-regional headquarters for the civil defence network.

The caverns at Rhydymwyn are not considered a suitable site for a sub-regional headquarters because of the danger of flooding.

Civil Disturbance, Toxteth

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will call for a report from the chief constable of Liverpool on the scale of the incidents which took place in Toxteth, Liverpool, on the evening of Saturday 24 April; and if he will make a statement.

At 4.15 pm on Saturday, 24 April two officers patrolling on foot in the Toxteth area were attacked by a group of 25 to 30 youths for no discernible reason. The officers' injuries were sufficiently serious for them to be detained overnight in hospital, although we are glad to learn that they have now been discharged.During the evening there were reports of gangs of youths engaged in stoning vehicles or committing acts of vandalism. In each case the police responded and the gangs broke up when officers arrived on the scene.

National Finance

Car Tax

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer on how many motor vehicles, by category, special car tax was collected on entry into the United Kingdom by land in each of the last six months for which such figures are available.

The figures are as follows:

October 19815
November 198135
December 19819
January 198231
February 198288
March 1982442
I regret that records of car tax payments at the place of importation do not distinguish between different categories of vehicles, for example, "new" or "used" or on the basis of country of manufacture.

Civil Service Pay (Arbitration)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will accept the recommendations of the arbitration tribunal on Civil Service pay.

Stamp Duty

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what loss of stamp duty revenue in 1982–83 would occur as a result of the implementation of each of the following changes:(a) an increase of £5,000 in each of the thresholds for stamp duty applicable to house purchase, (b) an increase of £10,000 in each of the thresholds for stamp duty applicable to house purchase, (c) raising each of the thresholds for stamp duty applicable to house purchase by an amount which would restore them to the real value held in 1974, by comparison with (i) the retail price index and (ii) the Building Societies Association and Department of the Environment house price index, (d) replacing the present system with a system whereby stamp duty is levied at the appropriate rate only on that part of the house price which exceeds each threshold and (e) implementing changes (c) and (d) together.

[pursuant to his reply, 29 April 1982, c. 313.]: The thresholds apply to all transfers other than those of stocks and shares. It has been assumed that the increases of £5,000 and £10,000 at (a) and (b) are additional to the increase of £5,000 in the stamp duty thresholds which were part of my right hon. and learned Friend's Budget proposals and to which temporary effect has already been given. It is estimated that if these changes applied to the whole fiscal year their implementation would reduce the revenue in 1982–83 from stamp duty on all such transfers currently estimated at £410 million, after allowing for the Budget changes by:|

£ million
(a)55
(b)95
(c) (i)180
(ii)125
(d)180
(e) (i)260
(ii)235
The figures contain an appropriate adjustment for leases.

Additional Age Tax Allowance

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what consideration he is giving to the extension of the additional age tax allowance to women at the age of 60 years.

[pursuant to his reply, 29 April 1982, c. 314]: I do not consider an extension of the age allowance would be justified, for the reasons given by my right hon. and learned Friend the Chief Secretary when this matter was discussed during the Committee stage of the Finance Bill.—[Vol. 22, c. 490–1.]

Energy

Domestic Supplies (Standing Charges)

asked the Secretary of State for Energy what representations he has received concerning the payment of standing charges for electricity and gas by pensioners since January 1982.

Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs

European Security And South Atlantic

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the policy of Her Majesty's Government towards recommendation 373 of the Western European Union Assembly on European security and the South Atlantic.

The Government's policy and the policies of other member Governments of Western Europe Union to Assembly recommendation 373 are set out in the reply to the recommendation agreed by the Council on 24 March. Shortly after that date Argentina invaded the Falkland Islands and South Georgia. The recommendation called for political solutions to reduce tension and the Government's first priority has been to seek a peaceful political settlement on the basis of Security Council resolution 502. This still remains the fundamental aim of the Government although we do not rule out the possible use of force.

Western European Union

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the policy of Her Majesty's Government towards recommendation 372 of the Western European Union Assembly on European union and the Western European Union.

The Government share the views of other member Governments of Western European Union as spelt out in the reply which the Council adopted on 24 March.

Japan (Argentine Sanctions)

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what reply the Japanese Government have given to the request of Her Majesty's Government to take action against Argentina following that country's aggression in the Falkland Islands; if he is satisfied that the Japanese Government are aware of the importance which Her Majesty's Government attach to this matter; and if he will make a statement.

Japan voted for Security Council Resolution 502, and on the basis of that resolution the Japanese Government have appealed both in public and in diplomatic representations to the Argentine Government for immediate Argentine withdrawal. Japan has also made it clear to Argentina that the crisis could affect economic relations between the two countries.The Japanese Government have issued advice to the business community designed to prevent any action by Japanese firms which would undermine the trade measures against Argentina applied by other countries. In addition, we understand that in present circumstances no new official credits will be given for exports to Argentina.Her Majesty's Government have kept in close touch with the Japanese Government throughout the crisis. We believe that they are fully aware of the importance we attach to the matter and to their support.

Council Of Ministers (Forthcoming Business)

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will publish in the Official Report a statement of forthcoming business in the European Community Council of Ministers.

At present, meetings of the Council of Ministers are planned for May. The usual written forecast was deposited in the House on 28 April. The Agriculture Council is expected to meet on 3–4 May to continue discussion of the 1982–83 CAP price fixing proposals and changes in Mediterranean support regimes in preparation for the enlargement of the Community.The Council of Industry Ministers is expected to meet on 4 May to discuss and review the state of the European steel regime. Discussions are likely to cover progress in carrying out the decision on State aids and capacity reductions and renewal of the anti-crisis measures with effect from 1 July and a proposal to open a duty free quota for imports of two grades of ferro-chrome. Ministers may also consider industrial strategy and Commission recommendations on telecommunications in industry.

The Budget Council is due to meet on 11 May to discuss the Council's negotiating position for a meeting at the end of May between the Presidents of the Council, Commission and European Parliament to discuss budgetary procedure.

The Finance Council is expected to meet on 17 May to resume discussions on the draft non-life insurance services directive and on the European monetary system. Ministers may also discuss the fifth medium-term economic programme and Japanese macro-economic policy.

The Fisheries Council is expected to meet on 18 May to discuss the outstanding issues of a revised common fisheries policy.

The Foreign Affairs Council is expected to meet on 25 May to review the Community's relations with Japan. There may also be a further meeting between the Council and the European Parliament for conciliation on a draft management regulation on the Community's food aid programme. The Council may also discuss any necessary follow up to the ACP/EC Ministers meeting on 13–14 May, and the question of aid to Central America.

The Labour and Social Affairs Council is expected to meet on 27 May to discuss a Commission communication on employment, which outlines a Community action programme to fight unemployment; the womens action programme, designed to promote the position of women in the Community; proposals for a four-year work programme for drawing up medium term projections of social expenditure and its financing and, as part of a general review of the proposals on the adaptation of working time, a recommendation on flexible retirement and a draft directive on part-time work. Ministers are also likely to consider a draft directive on the protection of workers from asbestos; the relationship between health and safety and technical barriers to trade and lead in the workplace.

Social Services

Unemployed Persons

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many unemployed persons who have ceased to qualify for unemployment benefit would be eligible for benefit if it were to be extended to all unemployed persons irrespective of the duration of unemployment; and if he will estimate the net cost to the national insurance fund of extending (a) unemployment benefit and (b) earnings related benefit to all unemployed persons.

In 1982–83 the number of unemployed claimants who, at a point in time, will have exhausted their entitlement to unemployment benefit is estimated to be 1,040,000 taking the average over the year. To abolish the one-year limit on entitlement would cost the national insurance fund an estimated £1,470 million in 1982–83. To restore earnings-related supplement on the basis which applied before the Social Security (No. 2) Act 1980, but without the six-months duration limit, for unemployed people only, would cost the fund an estimated £770 million, in addition to the expenditure which will be incurred in that year on supplement payable under the transitional arrangements.

Consultant Posts (Vacancies)

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will take steps to counter the effects that unfilled consultant posts have on patient care, particularly in some specialties in certain unpopular areas of the United Kingdom.

I see no reason for further steps. Our proposals to improve patient care by expansion of the consultant grade were set out in Cmnd. 8479. In specialties where there is a shortage of suitable experienced applicants for consultant posts health authorities have been encouraged to create additional training grade posts. Our system of allocation of posts in shortage specialties gives preference to regions with the lowest ratio of doctors in the specialty to population.

Family Planning

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he will ask the Health Education Council to run a specific campaign on family planning and phased parenthood in relation to the 16 to 19-year-old age group.

I understand that the council plans to repeat the advertisements used in its recent advertising campaign to prevent unwanted teenage pregnancies. It is also considering what further action to take.

Departmental Leaflets

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will instruct those responsible for writing his Department's leaflets to use plain, simple English so that claimants can understand their entitlement.

The Department always strives to write leaflets in as simple English as possible. The main obstacle to comprehension is frequently the complexity of the legislation covered in the leaflet. However, the fact that the Department's leaflets have won awards in the two Plain English Society competitions held to date shows some measure of success in making the leaflets easier to understand.

"Community Health Council News"

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now reconsider the cutting off of financial support to the publication of the "Community Health Council News".

Patients (Treatment Costs)

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many patients who attend the pathological and radiological departments of hospitals in each of the regions of England, Wales and Scotland, have been referred directly from the private clinics of part-time consultants and not from the hospital or its neighbour hospitals' outpatient clinics; in what percentage of cases referred from the consultants' private clinics a charge is made for the particular examination ordered; and what is the annual sum of money that the National Health Service has reclaimed in this way in each of the past three years, region by region.

Blood Transfusion Service

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how much blood collected by the Blood Transfusion Service in 1981 was made available for non-National Health Service purposes; and how much money was collected in charges for this.

I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for Walsall, South (Mr. George) on 11 March.—[Vol. 19, c. 473.]

Unclaimed Benefits

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the latest estimate of the amount of unclaimed Department of Health and Social Services benefits.

It seems possible that, of those benefits with a significant take-up problem, some £400 million may be unclaimed.

Supplementary Benefit

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people in Islington and in Greater London, respectively, are currently claiming supplementary benefit; how many are pensioners; and how these figures compare with May 1979.

Information is not available in the form requested. However, the numbers claiming from the four local offices, which deal with parts of Islington*, and the numbers claiming within the GLC area, are given in the following table:

May 1979February 1982
Claimants in Islington local offices
All supplementary benefit34,00046,000
Supplementary pension17,00017,000
Claimants in GLC area
All supplementary benefit434,000576,000
Supplementary pension248,000247,000

Source: 100 per cent. count of cases in action in local offices.

The local offices are Hoxton, Highgate, Stoke Newington and Finsbury Park. These offices will also deal with people who live outs de Islington.

Unemployment Benefit

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many persons in Manchester have exhausted their right to unemployment benefit; and what percentage of the unemployed in Manchester they represent.

At February 1982 there were 19,500 unemployed claimants at the 13 unemployment benefit offices in the Manchester area who had exhausted their entitlement to unemployment benefit. This was 32·3 per cent. of the total number of unemployed claimants in that area.

Maternity Grant

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will make a statement about the payment of non-contributory maternity grant.

Under the Social Security (Maternity Grant) Regulations 1981, non-contributory maternity grant provided for in section 5 of the Social Security Act 1980 will be paid in respect of confinements expected to occur on or after 4 July 1982. Parliamentary approval of provision for this new service has been sought in the 1982–83 Main Estimates for the family benefits Vote (Class xii 3), pending that approval, the necessary expenditure will be met by a repayable advance from the Contingencies Fund.

Northern Ireland

Women Prisoners

asked the Secretary of State for Ireland what works are being carried out or are planned a prisons for women prisoners in Northern Ireland; what is the total cost of such works; and how these works will affect the total number of places available.

No significant works are being carried out or are planned at Her Majesty's prison, Armagh, which is the only women's prison in Northern Ireland.A new prison for women is presently under construction at Maghaberry, County Antrim and when it is opened in 1983 the existing prison at Armagh will be closed. The expected cost of the women's section of Her Majesty's prison, Maghaberry is approximately £3 million and it will provide facilities for 56 female prisoners.

Statute Of Limitations (Admiralty Actions)

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will publish in the Official Report the substance of his reply to the right hon. Member for Down, South on 16 March regarding his application of the Statute of Limitations (Northern Ireland) Order 1982 to Admiralty actions.

The following is the text of the reply:

During the course of the debate on 1 March on the draft Limitation Amendment (Northern Ireland) Order 1982 you raised a query in respect of the application of the Statute of Limitations (Northern Ireland) 1958 to Admiralty actions.
As I stated during the debate causes of action within the Admiralty jurisdiction of the High Court have not thus far been covered by the Statute of Limitations (Northern Ireland) 1958.A similar situation persisted in Great Britain until the enactment of the Limitation Amendment Act 1980.
The reason for the exclusion of Admiralty actions from the rules laid down in the various Statutes of Limitations is based on the fact that proceedings in Admiralty could be pursued "in rem". Actions in rem are peculiar to the Admiralty Jurisdiction and are distinguishable from ordinary common law forms of action.
An action in rem is one in which the subject matter itself is sought to be affected and in which the claimant is enabled to arrest the ship, cargo or freight and have it detained in the custody of officers of the law until the claim has been adjudicated upon. It was considered that to have the normal rules of limitation apply to actions in rem would have created difficulties. The Law Reform Committee investigated this matter and concluded unanimously that the reason for the exclusion of Admiralty action from the normal rules of limitation was no longer sufficiently cogent and that the abolition of the exception would not in fact give rise to any difficulties in practice.

Environment

Glass Recycling

asked the Secretary of state the Environment if he will list the local authorities that operate services for glass recycling; and if he will make a statement.

We are giving as much encouragement as possible to the bottle bank scheme, which is organized by the glass industry in co-operation with local authorities, and welcome the industry's efforts during glass recycling year to expand the scheme further The Glass Manufacturers Federation advise that all the following local authorities have joined the scheme:ENGLAND

  • Avon:
  • Kingswood

Bedfordshire:

  • North Bedford

Berkshire:

  • Bracknell
  • Newbury
  • Reading
  • Windsor and Maidenhead
  • Wokingham

Buckinghamshire:

  • Chiltern

Cambridgeshire:

  • Cambridge (from 1 May 1982)

Cheshire:

  • Chester
  • Ellesmere Port and Neston
  • Northwich

Cornwall

  • Restormel

Cumbria

  • Scheme operated by county council

Derbyshire:

  • Chesterfield

Devon:

  • Scheme operated by county council

Dorset:

  • West Dorset
  • Weymouth and Portland

Durham:

  • Darlington

Essex:

  • Scheme operated by county council

Gloucestershire:

  • Cheltenham
  • Cotswold
  • Forest of dean
  • Gloucester
  • Stroud
  • Tewkesbury

Greater London

  • Barnet
  • Brent
  • Ealing
  • Greenwich
  • Harrow
  • Hillingdon
  • Hounslow
  • Merton
  • Richmond
  • Waltham Forest
  • Westminster

Greater Manchester:

  • Bolton
  • Manchester
  • Oldhom
  • Tameside
  • Trafford
  • Wigan

Hampshire:

  • East Hampshire
  • Eastleigh
  • Portsmouth
  • Rushmoor
  • Southampton
  • Test Valley
  • Winchester

Hereford and Worcester:

  • Wyre Forest
  • Hertfordshire:
  • Dacorum
  • North Hertfordshire
  • Stevenage (from 30 April)
  • Three Rivers
  • Welwyn and Hatfield

Humberside:

  • Scheme operated by County Council

Kent:

  • Scheme operated by County Council

Lancashire:

  • Blackburn
  • Chorley
  • Pendle
  • South Ribble
  • Rossendale
  • Wyre
  • Blackpool

Leicestershire:

  • Hickley and Bosworth
  • Leicester

Lincolnshire:

  • Lincoln

Merseyside:

  • St. Helens
  • Wirral

Norfolk:

  • Scheme operated by County Council

Northamptonshire:

  • Daventry
  • Kettering
  • Northampton
  • South Northampton
  • Wellingborough

Northumberland:

  • Alnwick

Nottinghamshire:

  • Bassetlaw
  • Mansfield

Oxfordshire

  • cherwell
  • Oxford
  • Vale of White Horse
  • West Oxfordshire

Shropshire:

  • Wrekin

Staffordshire:

  • Burton-on-Trent (from 29 April)

Surrey:

  • Mole Valley
  • Reigate and Banstead

East Sussex

  • Scheme operated by County Council

West Sussex:

  • Worthing

Tyne and Wear:

  • Blythe Valley
  • North Tyneside

Warwickshire:

  • Nuneaton and Bedworth
  • Rugby
  • Stratford-upon-Avon
  • North Warwickshire

West Midlands:

  • Birmingham
  • Dudley

Wiltshire:

  • Salisbury
  • Wootton Bassett

North Yorkshire:

  • Harrogate
  • Ryedale
  • Scarborough
  • York

South Yorkshire:

  • Scheme operated by County Council

West Yorkshire:

  • Bradford
  • Calderdale
  • Kirklees
  • Leeds
  • Wakefield

SCOTLAND

Borders:

  • Ettrick and Lauderdale
  • Roxburgh
  • Tweedale

Central:

  • Clackmannan
  • Falkirk
  • Stirling

Dumfries and Galloway:

  • Nithsdale

Fife:

  • Dunfermline
  • Kirkcaldy
  • North East Fife

Grampian:

  • Kincardine and Deeside

Lothian:

  • Edinburgh
  • East Lothian
  • Mid Lothian
  • West Lothian

Strathclyde:

  • Bearsden and Milnegavie
  • Cunningham
  • Curnock and Doon Valley
  • Dumbarton
  • East Kilbride
  • Glasgow
  • Kilmarnock and Loundoun
  • Monklands
  • Renfrew
  • Strathkelvin

Tayside:

  • Dundee
  • Perth and Kinross

WALES

Clwyd:

  • Colwyn

Rooftop Dish Aerials

asked the Secretary of state for the Environment what consideration he has given to the environmental implications, particularly in conservation areas, of the widespread installation of rooftop dish aerials which might result from the introduction of satellite broadcasting.

The environmental implications of such aerials are being carefully considered in advance of the likely introduction of direct satellite broadcasting in 1986.

Stonham Housing Association

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will arrange for an exhibition relating to the Stonham housing association to be displayed in the Upper Waiting Hall.

I understand that arrangements are being made with the authorities of the House for an exhibition to be held in the Upper Waiting Hall from 4 to 7 May.

Local Authorities (Audits)

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will now announce further appointments of private sector accountancy firms as additional district auditors to audit the accounts for 1981–82 of certain local authorities in England.

I have today appointed the following as additional district auditors. The names of the authorities with which they will be concerned are given in brackets.

  • Mr. R. J. Walls of Messrs Price Waterhouse (Derby city council)
  • Mr. R. Legge of Messrs Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co (London borough of Newham)
  • Mr. A Hardcastle of Messrs Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co (London borough of Tower Hamlets)
  • Mr. J. Ellam of Messrs Armitage and Norton (Wolverhampton borough council)
  • Mr. D. G. Burgoyne of Messrs Ernst & Whinney (South Hams district council)
This brings to 14 the total number of such appointments made under the arrangements first announced by my right hon. Friend the Minister for Local Government and Environmental Services in his statement to the House on 28 July 1981.

Birds And Mammals (Poisons)

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether the Government have now considered the report by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, "Silent Death", concerning the destruction of birds and mammals through the deliberate misuse of poisons; and if he will make a statement.

Yes. My right hon. Friend and I are most grateful to the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds for its initiative here, and for all the resources, time and effort put into the compilation of this report. It has been widely circulated and studied within Government Departments and other public sector bodies concerned with safeguarding wildlife against deliberate misuse of poisons. It has also been of much help in arousing necessary public awareness of this problem; and that in itself is a valuable first step towards stamping out these despicable practices.In several instances the RSPB's objectives or proposals were reflected both in recent debates on the Wildlife and Countryside Bill; and in the legislation as now enacted. Elsewhere Departments concerned have taken, or will be taking, action in sympathy with themes in the report. I have today sent the RSPB a considered response to each of its itemised recommendations; and I am arranging for a copy of its report, and the Government's detailed response, to be placed in the Library of the House.

Industry

Cable Television

asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he has estimated the total number of jobs which the introduction of cable television would bring to the United Kingdom; and if he will make a statement.

The Government consider that the expansion of cable television will offer significant industrial and employment opportunities, but quantitative estimates of the total number of jobs which this would bring to the United Kingdom have not been made. The number of jobs likely to result from the introduction of cable television will depend on the nature of the service provided, the speed at which an extensive cable system develops, and the success of British equipment producers in both the home and overseas markets. Furthermore, an unknown but probably significant proportion of expenditure on cable television is likely to displace expenditure elsewhere in the economy. To the extent that this is so, some of the jobs created by cable television will be offset by losses elsewhere. In such a rapidly changing and uncertain situation, estimates of the total number of jobs which the introduction of cable television will bring to the United Kingdom cannot be made.

Postal Services

asked the Secretary of State for Industry if, pursuant to his policy of improving the efficiency of letter delivery by the Post Office, he will request it to give wider publicity to section 13 of the code of practice for postal services which enables the users of the postal services to reclaim their postal costs if their mail is delayed in delivery due to the fault of the postal authorities.

That is a matter for the Post Office in consultation with the Post Office Users National Council. I understand, however, that it is intended that the revised code of practice for postal services due for publication in June of this year should receive wide publicity, and I welcome this.

Lazard Scheme

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how much money the Government have put into the Lazard scheme for the rationalisation of the steel foundry industry; and how much of this finance is going towards enhanced redundancy payments for the redundant workers.

The Government have made a grant of £795,145 towards compensation payments to be made to companies closing under the high alloy (static) scheme. The proportion to be spent on redundancy payments is a matter for the individual companies.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what consultation took place with the appropriate trade union with regard to the implementation of the Lazard agreement for the steel foundry industry; and what is the purpose of the agreement.

The steel castings industry reconstruction agreement is intended to promote voluntary rationalisation by means of self-help levy schemes. Participants remaining in business in each sector pay a levy in order to fund compensation payments to companies who volunteer to close. I understand that trade union representatives have been kept informed of developments by Lazards and that companies concerned in individual schemes will consult employees and trade unions about detailed closure arrangements.

Development Board For Rural Wales

asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he has completed his review of assisted area status as it affects the area of the Development Board for Rural Wales.

The review of former special development and development areas which are due to become non-assisted from August this year—including a number in the area of the Development Board for Rural Wales—is currently under way and my right hon. Friend expects to announce the results shortly.

Process Machinery (Investment Grants)

asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he will make provision for an investment grant against the purchase of process machinery; and

1980 and 1981 Manufacturing project investment decisions by foreign owned companies known to IBB In the following table: Projects—includes first time investments, expansions, joint ventures and takeovers Jobs—represents long terms projections of employment
Country of Origin
U.S.A.West GermanyJapanCanadaSwitzerlandSwedenNetherlandsFranceDenmarkNorwayBelgiumFinlandRest of the WorldTotals
North East
Projects114123115230
Jobs1,74345992011065252541503,726
North West (including Cumbria)
Projects87321111125
Jobs9123121,098246070502,526
Yorkshire and Humberside
Projects932*½3*11123
Jobs5852238111499200141,028
West Midlands
Projects243110
Jobs250541,2002001,704
East Midlands
Projects3111*2*½1112
Jobs861651819026306035466
South West
Projects9112114
Jobs2,2573004503,007
London and South East (including East Anglia)
Projects81411412111337
Jobs3242994001203415094283501,799
Northern Ireland
Projects19361433
Jobs4,30316660831975,277
Scotland
Projects393232321257
Jobs8,4102106792936430122510410,286
Wales
Projects925434111333
Jobs1.073708503,36541913635172966,261
Totals
Projects1174211131219169673316274
Jobs19,9431,6082,2344,8121,7378271,3031,469392285110631,29736,080
* Includes a joint venture between two foreign companies.

whether he will consider making such grant on a two-tiered basis, namely 40 per cent. for British machines and 15 per cent. for imported machines.

I have no plans to add to the existing investment allowances and other schemes of industrial assistance for which process machinery may be eligible.

Invest In Britain Bureau

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many projects in total were brought into the United Kingdom to the knowledge of the Invest in Britain Bureau; where the projects went; and how many jobs were created region by region.

[pursuant to his reply, 29 April 1982, c. 320]: The information in respect of the two years 1980 and 1981 is as follows:

Scotland

Burgh Police (Scotland) Act 1892

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many convictions there were in Scotland under section 435 of the Burgh Police (Scotland) Act 1892 in each of the last 10 years.

This information is not separately identified in the statistics compiled by my Department.

Local Authority Expenditure

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing for each Scottish local authority and for authorities as a whole (a) the 1982–83 guideline for services within relevant expenditure, (b) the budgeted expenditure for 1982–83 on a comparable basis and (c) the difference between (a) and (b), in £ sterling and as a percentage.

The information is contained in the following table:

£ million in cash
1982–83 Budget*1982–83 GuidelineExcess
£ million£ million£ millionPer cent.
Regional Councils
Borders42·4442·000·441·0
Central109·19102·756·446·3
Dumfries and Galloway57·7457·000·741·3
Fife135·31127·507·816·1
Grampian183·16181·501·660·9
Highland92·2885·0010·2812·1
Lothian361·57295·0066·5722·6
Strathclyde1,103–481,051–7551·734·9
Tayside167·90156·0011·907·6
ALL REGIONS2,256–052,098–50157·557·5
Islands Councils
Orkney14·7410·923·8235·0
Shetland23·3313·0010·3379·5
Western Isles20·8418·382·4613·4
ALL ISLANDS58·9242·3016·6239·3
District Councils
BORDERS
Berwickshire0·710·700·012·0
Ettrick and Lauderdale1·371·200·1714·3
Roxburgh1·521·460·064·0
Tweeddale0·550·58-0·03-4·7
CENTRAL
Clackmannan2·852·680·176·4
Falkirk9·448·690·758·6
Stirling6·694·582·1146·0
DUMFRIES AND GALLOWAY
Annadale and Eskdale1·321·260·064·4
Nithsdale2·072·07
Stewartry0·870·820·059·2
Wigtown1·020·930·099·2
FIFE
Dunfermline6·705·780·9215·9
Kirkcaldy9·368·361·0012·0
North-East Fife3·833·670·164·3
GRAMPIAN
Aberdeen13·9811·692·2919·5
Banff and Buchan3·483·48
1982–83 Budget*1982–83 GuidelineExcess
£ million£ million£ millionPer cent.
Gordon2·882·88
Kincardine and'Deeside1·421·370·053·8
Moray4·064·06
HIGHLAND
Badenoch and Strathspey0·420·370·0513·0
Caithness1·141·14
Inverness2·942·620·3212·1
Lochaber0·960·820·1417·3
Nairn0·390·43-0·04-10·2
Ross and Cromarty1·781·730·052·9
Skye and Lochalsh0·39†0·340·0514·4
Sutherland0·700·570·1322·6
LOTHIAN
East Lothian5·094·730·367·6
Edinburgh29·30†28·700·602·1
Midlothian4·894·860·030·6
West Lothian7·056·041·0116·7
STRATHCLYDE
Argyll and Bute5·925·120·8015·7
Bearsden and Milngavie2·582·190·3918·0
Clydebank3·823·580·246·6
Clydesdale3·613·020·5919·4
Cumbernauld and Kilsyth3·703·290·4112·5
Cumnock and Doon Valley2·652·140·5124·0
Cunninghams8·678·410·263·1
Dumbarton5·434·830·6012·4
East Kilbride5·594·870·7214·7
Eastwood3·102·830·279·5
Glasgow77·7569·218·5412·3
Hamilton6·565·710·8515·0
Inverclyde5·946·12-0·19-3·0
Kilmarnock and Loudoun5·084·610·4710·2
Kyle and Carrick7·877·390·486·5
Monklands6·715·960·7512·6
Motherwell8·908·510·394·6
Renfrew16·4014·651·7511·9
Strathkelvin5·765·050·7114·0
TAYSIDE
Angus5·024·680·347·3
Dundee12·0211·410·615·3
Perth and Kinross5·665·450·213·9
ALL DISTRICTS337·90307·8230·089·8
ALL SCOTLAND:2,652–872,448–62204·258·3
* The figures are as returned by local authorities and incorporate such amendments as have so far been agreed with Directors of Finance.
† These guidelines differ from those published in Finance Circular 5/1982 as a result of technical adjustments.

Trespass

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many persons have been convicted in Scotland under the provisions of the Trespass (Scotland) Act 1865 in each of the last 10 years; how many persons were sentenced to a period of imprisonment; and how many offences under this Act were made known to the police.

Information for the years 1972 to 1980 is set out in the following table; information for 1981 is not yet available.

Trespass (Scotland) Act 1865

Scotland

Year

Number of offences Recorded by the Police

Number of persons against whom charge was proved*

Number sentenced to imprisonment

1972291†271;6
1973434†37810
19743653326
19754913775
197643644112
19774093416
19782621112
19792931266
1980327‡230‡11

* Excluding those given a more serious penalty for another offence at the same proceedings.

† Number of persons convicted or found guilty (ie. excludes cases where no conviction or finding of guilt is recorded—eg. probation).

*Provisional.

Fixed Penalty Notices

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will give in a manner similar to table 2.10 in "Criminal Statistics Scotland 1979" (Cmnd. 8215) percentages of what subsequent actions followed the issue of a fixed penalty notice in 1980 and 1981.

The number of community service orders made, by age group, sex and period of service, 1980
MalesFemales
Number of hours16 and under 2121 and under 3030 and under 4040 and overTotal16 and under 2121 and under 3030 and under 4040 and overTotalGrand Total
40 and under 100601214212235342110245
100 and under 15039623010141591116157
150 and under 200824114472220653
200 to 24061564310212536
Total113222893045410176437491

Criminal Statistics

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will set out the numbers of persons against whom a charge was proved, by age and disposal in 1980 and 1981 using the headings in table 6.7 in "Criminal Statistics Scotland 1979" (Cmnd. 8215).

The information for 1980 is set out in the following table. Figures for 1981 are not yet available.

Number of persons against whom a charge was proved, by age and disposal, 1980.
ScotlandNumber of Persons
Persons under 16
Detention97
Probation67
Fine440
Other449
TOTAL1,053

The information requested for 1980 is set out below; information for 1981 is not yet available.

Fixed penalty notices—subsequent action, Scotland 1980
Percentage of notices issued
Penalty paid73
No further action:
Cautioned and excused payment5
Diplomatic privilege/visitor from abroad4
Time limit for proceedings expired9
Other reasons3
Total where no further action taken21
Proceedings commenced6
Total100

Community Service Orders

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will set out the number of community service orders made in 1980 and 1981 by age group, sex and period of service broken down as in table 6.11 of "Criminal Statistics Scotland 1979" (Cmnd. 8215).

The information requested for 1980 is set out in the following table. Detailed figures for 1981 are not yet available but the provisional figure for the total number of orders made in that year is 1,170.

ScotlandNumber of Persons
Persons 16 and over and companies
Prison7,050
Young Offenders' Institution1,799
Borstal715
Detention Centre923
Other detention9
Probation2,411
Fine208,021
Other24,277
Total245,205
TOTAL246,258
(Provisional)

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will set out the numbers of persons proceeded against, by crime and offence group and type of proceedings, in 1980 and 1981, following the headings set out in table 6.2 of "Criminal Statistics Scotland 1979" (Cmnd. 8215).

The information requested for 1980 is set out in the following table. Figures for 1981 are not yet available.

Persons proceeded against by crime and offence group and type of proceedings, 1980
ScotlandNumber
GroupSolemnSummaryTotal
Non-sexual crimes of violence
against the person1,3182,1733,491
Crimes involving indecency1759861,161
Crimes involving dishonesty1,84539,21341,058
Fire-raising, malicious and
reckless conduct974,9835,080
Other crimes2033,3813,584
Total crimes3,63850,73654,374
Miscellaneous offences29187,25087,541
Initial Reports on Children, by Crime/Offence Group 1980 Scotland—Number of reports
GroupReferred to Procurator FiscalReferred to reporterReferred for police warning or to JLO*Total
1. Non sexual crimes of violence against the person22320027450
2. Crimes involving indecency671178192
3. Crimes involving dishonesty5,30710,9883,44919,744
4. Fire-raising, malicious and reckless conduct5701,6995562,825
5. Other crimes735513141
Total crimes6,24013,0594,05323,352
6. Miscellaneous offences3,5083,4141,5438,465
7. Motor vehicle offences745210641,019
Total offences4,2533,6241,6079,484
Total crimes and offences10,49316,6835,66032,836
(Provisional).
* Juvenile Liaison Officer.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will set out the number of initial reports on children made by the police, showing to whom these children were referred and the number of reports per 1,000 children aged 8 to 15 years, in 1980 and 1981 in a manner similar to table 5.1 in "Criminal Statistics Scotland 1979" (Cmnd. 8215).

The information for 1980 is set out below. Figures for 1981 are not yet available.

Initial reports on children, Scotland 1980
Referred to/forNumberper cent.
Procurator Fiscal10,49332
Reporter16,68351
Formal police warning/juvenile liaison officer5,66017
TOTAL32,836100
Reports per 1,000 children aged 8 to 1548
Provisional.

Group

Solemn

Summary

Total

Motor vehicle offences190122,740122,930
Total offences481209,990210,471
Total crimes and offences4,119260,726264,845
(provisional)

Children (Police Reports)

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will break down initial reports on children made by the police in 1980 and 1981 by crime and offence group, following the headings in table 5·2 in "Criminal Statistics Scotland 1979" (Cmnd. 8215).

The information requested for 1980 is set out in the following table. Information for 1981 is not yet available.

Firearms

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will give the number of crimes in which a firearm was involved recorded by the police in 1980 and 1981, broken down into type of weapon used and divided into crimes in which a weapon was used in the commission or crimes which resulted from the reckless handling of firearms following the headings used in table 4.1 of "Criminal Statistics Scotland 1979" (Cmnd. 8215).

The number of serious crimes of violence recorded by the police in which a firearm was used in 1980 and 1981 is given in the following table.

Scotland

Crimes

1980

1981

Type of Weapon

Homicide

Attempted Murder

Assault

Robbery

Total

Homicide

Attempted Murder

Assault

Robbery

Total

Shotgun8471921342342
Revolver3912231015
Rifle123134
Air Weapon17114861781796
Other3434624345
Total1083731665178793202

The number of crimes recorded by the police involving reckless handling of firearms causing injury or property damage is given in the following table.

Scotland

Crimes

1980

1981

Type of Weapon

Injury

Property Damage

Total

Injury

Property-Damage

Total

Shotgun2794111
Revolver22411
Rifle16766
Air Weapon124508632175629804
Other2211
Total129525654180643823

Bail

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many people applied for bail in sheriff courts for any convenient period during which the Bail etc. (Scotland) Act 1980 was in operation; how many of these were released on bail; in how many cases bail was refused; and if he can give similar figures for Glasgow, Edinburgh and Aberdeen sheriff courts.

Application for bail in sheriff courts, 1 April 1980– 28 March 1981
All courts in exerciseGlasgow*Edinburgh†Aberdeen
Persons applying for bail‡16,1208,4283,1721,389
— released on bail10,2325,1012,225832
— refused bail5,8233,283940555
* Because of the strike of court staff in 1981, these figures cover the period to 14 March 1981 only.
† Because of the strike of court staff in 1981, these figures cover the period to 27 February 1981 only.
‡ Includes a small number who were granted bail but failed to find it or to agree bail conditions before removal to a prison or other institution.

Transport

Lorry Weights

asked the Secretary of State for Transport which organisations have made representations to him in favour of increased weights of heavy goods vehicles.

Many trade associations, individual companies and professional transport institutions, together with some local authorities, national bodies such as the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, and individual members of the public, have made representations to us in favour of increased weights for heavy goods vehicles.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether consultations have been held between his Department and Kent county council regarding the detection and prosecution of overloaded heavy goods vehicles.

The only information available on the granting of bail in sheriff courts during the operation of the Bail etc. (Scotland) Act 1980 is that collected in the monitoring exercise conducted in 11 sheriff courts covering approximately 45 per cent. of persons proceeded against in sheriff courts during the first year of operation of the Act. Figures for this period are set out in the following table:

It is my Department's general policy to cooperate fully with all the other agencies concerned in order to secure effective enforcement of lorry weights. Consultation takes place with Kent county council on roadside check programmes, records of convictions for overloading and selection of new weighbridge sites. My Department is currently examining a number of ways of improving liaison between enforcement agencies.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many letters have been received by his Department concerning any proposed increase in lorry weights.

Since publication of our White Paper last December, about 550 letters have been received directly by my Department concerning our proposals. A similar number have been forwarded by Members of Parliament.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport what representations he has received from the Association of Municipal Authorities regarding proposed increases in lorry weights; whether he will publish details of any reply; and if he will make a statement.

The Association of Metropolitan Authorities has written to my right hon. Friend, making a number of detailed comments on our White Paper proposals. These are being taken into account, together with other representations received, in developing our final package of measures on heavy lorries. My right hon. Friend has no objections if the AMA wishes to publish the reply that he has sent them.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he has any plans for a consultative exercise to ascertain the view of the general public toward any increase in the weight of heavy goods vehicles.

The Armitage inquiry into "Lorries, People and the Environment" took evidence very widely. Many people and organisations subsequently expressed their views on the report and there have been two debates on it in the House of Commons. Our White Paper proposals, which build on the Armitage recommendations, have also been debated in the House and have been the subject of further numerous representations from members of the general public as well as firms and other interested organisations. There has therefore already been an extensive consultation exercise.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he plans any further legislation concerning the overloading of heavy goods vehicles.

No. The existing legislation gives adequate powers to the enforcement authorities.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether investigations have been carried out by his Department into the effect on bridges of any increase in the weight of heavy goods vehicles; and if he will make a statement.

Yes. The results of the investigations are reported at paragraph 32 of the recent White Paper "Lorries, People and the Environment" Cmnd. 8439 and at paragraphs 20–23 of the Department's technical note "The Effects of Increasing Lorry Weights".

Heavy Lorries

asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he will bring forward proposals to assess the effect of heavy lorries on the environment.

My Department has already produced, in collaboration with the Department of the Environment, outline proposals for a common approach to assessing the effects of lorries on the environment. These proposals have been broadly welcomed by the local authority associations and arrangements are being made for a number of joint studies of specific cases to refine the methods. It is hoped that general advice on the subject will be issued before the end of the year.We already take into account the environmental impact of traffic in assessing new trunk road schemes.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he intends to introduce legislation to restrict the passage of heavy goods vehicles along urban non-classified roads.

I have made it clear on a number of occasions that the Government agree with the Armitage report that local authorities have adequate powers to control the movement of lorries in their areas. We recently issued a circular encouraging authorities to make more extensive use of these wide powers.

British Rail

asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he last met the chairman of British Railways to discuss the effects of the rail drivers' dispute on the question of rostering; and whether he will make a statement.

I meet the chairman of BR frequently, and naturally we have discussed the implications of the recent dispute on a number of occasions. I expect we shall speak again when the Railway Staff National Tribunal has issued its report.

Roads (Construction)

asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will publish in the Official Report details of investment in new road construction and improvement in England for each year since 1972, with projections to 1984 for local roads divided into (a) urban classified roads, (b) urban non-classified roads, (c) rural classified roads and (d) rural non-classified roads, together with the approximate national mileage in each category.

Local road expenditure is the responsibility of local authorities. I regret that the information requested is not collected from them in this form.

Motorways (Traffic Flows)

asked the Secretary of State for Transport which sections of motorways currently have a traffic flow in excess of their design capacity; and what is the percentage of that excess.

We no longer work to fixed design capacities and I cannot therefore specify the degree of overloading in the way requested. Depending on the local circumstances, however, when traffic flow reaches a certain density, delays begin to build up. On certain sections of M1, M4, M5, M6, M62 and M63 traffic flows are at or approaching these levels during peak periods.We have in hand proposals for widening the worst pressed lengths of M1, M5 and M63 and a short section of M4 between London Airport and the M25.

Dock Workers (Severance Payments)

asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he is providing any financial assistance to meet the cost of registered dock worker severances in the ports of London and Liverpool.

Substantial reductions in registered manpower are essential in these two ports if the Port of London Authority and the Mersey Docks and Harbour Company are to meet the objective I have set them of returning to profitability in 1983. The Government will therefore be meeting the full cost of severing registered dock workers in the ports of London and Liverpool under the special offer announced by the national joint council for the port transport industry on 14 April.

Defence

Falkland Islands

asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether there will be an inquiry into the circumstances in which United Kingdom armed forces in the Falkland Islands and dependencies surrendered to the Argentine invaders; and when such inquiry will open.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether a British submarine was in position to intercept the Argentine invasion fleet on or before 2 April.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will apply "war zone" status to the Falkland Islands in order that the relatives of those serving in that theatre of operations can obtain the full facilities of forces mail rates.

All members of Her Majesty's Forces serving overseas are already entitled to concessionary rates of postage between this country and their overseas address. These rates allow most types of mail to be sent to troops and dependants overseas at approximately inland postal rates.

United States Bases

asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many United States bases there are in the United Kingdom; and if he will list them in the Official Report.

I refer the hon. Member to the answers given to the hon. Member for Keighley (Mr. Cryer) on 18 June 1980—[Vol. 986, c. 587–8]—7 July 1980—[Vol. 988, c. 54–5]—8 August 1980—[Vol. 991, c. 481]—11 November 1980—[Vol. 992, c. 153]—and the hon. Member for Wolverhampton, North—East (Mrs. Short) on 2 December 1980—[Vol. 995, c. 155]. To the facilities listed should be added the following which have been transferred to the United States since December 1980: RAF Little Rissington, which will be a peace-time storage and war-time hospital facility; and RAF Cranwell and RAE Bedford, which will be collocated operating bases in war-time.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether the United States Government make any payments to the Government in respect of each United States base on British territory; and, if so, if he will describe the form this payment takes in each case.

It is not the practice to disclose the financial details of the confidential basing agreements we have with our allies.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence how much money North Atlantic Treaty Organisation countries. other than the United States of America, pay for facilities at (a) British and (b) United States operated bases in the United Kingdom.

It is not our practice to release detailed financial information concerning bilateral arrangements with our allies. I have no record of the use of facilities at United States operated bases in the United Kingdom by other North Atlantic Treaty Organisation countries.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list the treaties, statutory provisions or agreements under which the United States of America maintains bases on United Kingdom territory.

I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to the hon. Member for Keighley (Mr. Cryer) on 10 December 1980—[Vol. 995, c. 680]—in respect of United States forces based in the United Kingdom. Arrangements regarding United States bases in United Kingdom territories overseas are contained in the 1941 agreement on Bermuda, Cmnd. 6259; the 1956 agreement on Ascension Island, Cmnd. 9810; and the 1966 and 1976 exchange of notes on Diego Garcia, Cmnds. 3231 and 6413 respectively.

Nuclear Weapons Limitation

asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether consultations between European members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation leading towards the establishment of a collective view on the limitation of nuclear weapons in Europe, as requested in recommendation 372 adopted by the Western European Union Assembly on 1 December 1981 have begun; with what results; whether he expects the progress of such talks to allow the Western European Union Council to acquaint the United States Government with an agreed view; and when.

I have been asked to reply.In its reply to recommendation 372 the council of the Western European Union drew attention to consultations which already take place in the framework of European political co-operation, the North Atlantic Council and the Special Consultative Group which is the NATO body responsible for discussion of the United States' negotiating position in the Geneva talks on intermediate-range nuclear weapons. European members of the alliance of course make their views known to the United States in the latter two fora and fully support the zero option as the objective of the negotiations.

Departmental Spending

asked the Secretary of State for Defence by how much his Department underspent its budgeted amount for the year ended 31 March 1982.

It is too early to say yet what the final outturn figure for 1981–82 defence spending will be, but it is expected to be very close to the cash provision published in Cmnd. 8494.

Agricultural Meteorological Unit

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what consultations he has had over the proposed closure of the agricultural meteorological unit in Edinburgh; and if he has yet reached a decision on its future.

The future of the unit was discussed with the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and the council of the Scottish colleges of agriculture between April and October 1981. The unit closed last December and alternative arrangements were made to supply meteorological information as required.

Royal Navy (Local Overseas Allowance)

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what rate of local overseas allowance is laid down in naval pay regulations for officers and ratings in ships whose last port of call was Gibraltar.

Officers and ratings would be in receipt of local overseas allowance at the daily rate appropriate to the Mediterranean area while at Gibraltar and under normal conditions the same rate would continue in payment until the next overseas port of call at which shore leave was granted. These rates vary with rank. For example, £1·45 a day for a lieutenant RN or 97p a day for a leading Seaman. If the ship were returning to the United Kingdom without further opportunity for overseas shore leave, entitlement to LOA would cease from the date of leaving Gibraltar.For the reasons given in my written answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Halesowen and Stourbridge (Mr. Stokes) on 21 April 1982—[Vol. 22, c.

111]—a standard rate of LOA of £1 a day is currently payable to all service personnel in the Falkland Islands task force.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what rate of local overseas allowance is laid down in naval pay regulations for officers and ratings in ships whose last ports of call were in West Indies ports.

Officers and ratings would be in receipt of local overseas allowance at the daily rate appropriate to the American area while at the West Indies port and, under normal conditions, the same rate would continue in payment until the next overseas port of call at which shore leave was granted. These rates vary with rank: for example £3·35 a day for a lieutenant RN or £2·77 a day for a leading seaman. If the ship were returning to the United Kingdom without further opportunity for overseas shore leave, entitlement to LOA would cease from the date of leaving the West Indies port.For the reasons given in my written answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Halesowen and Stourbridge (Mr. Stokes) on 21 April 1982—[Vol. 22, c.

111]—a standard rate of LOA of £1 a day is currently payable to all service personnel in the Falkland Islands task force.

Royal Navy And Royal Fleet Auxiliary

asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will give an updated list of the names and type of each ship of the Royal Navy and the Royal Fleet Auxiliary that have been, or on present plans are intended to be, withdrawn from the active fleet in each year from 1980 to 1986.

The ships from the Royal Navy and Royal Fleet Auxiliary that have been, or on current plans will be, withdrawn from the active fleet in the period 1980–84, are as follows. Certain of the vessels will enter the standby squadron where they will remain declared to NATO.As for 1985–86, it is not our general practice to give details of disposal plans so far ahead, although as already announced "Hermes" will be run on until 1985.

Royal Navy

1980

  • "Blake"—Helicopter Cruiser
  • "Ashanti"—Tribal Class Frigate
  • "Eskimo"—Tribal Class Frigate
  • "Gurkha"—Tribal Class Frigate
  • "Mohawk"—Tribal Class Frigate
  • "Nubian"—Tribal Class Frigate
  • "Tartar"(†)—Tribal Class Frigate
  • "Berwick"(†)Rothesay Class Frigate
  • "Tenacity"—Fast Attack Craft
  • "Dittisham"—Inshore Minesweeper
  • "Isis"—Inshore Minesweeper

1981

  • "Bulwark"—ASW/Commando Carrier
  • "London"—Country Class Destroyer
  • "Juno"(*)—Leander Class Frigate
  • "Brighton"—Rothesay Class Frigate
  • "Falmouth"(†)—Rothesay Class Frigate
  • "Glasserton"—Coastal Minesweeper
  • "Sabre"—Fast Target Boat
  • "Scimitar"—Fast Target Boat
  • "Cutlass"—Fast Target Boat

1982

  • "Norfolk"—County Class Destroyer
  • "Bacchante"—Leander Class Frigate
  • "Naiad"—Leander Class Frigate
  • "Rhyl"—rothesay Class Frigate
  • "Laleston"—Coastal Patrol Craft
  • "Porpoise"—Porpoise Class Submarine
  • "Speedy"—Hydrofoil
  • 2SRN6—Hovercraft
  • "Londonderry"—Trials ship
  • "Dreadnought"—Valiant Class Submarine
  • VT2—Hovercraft
  • "Achilles"—Leander Class Frigate

1983

  • "Dido"—Leander Class Frigate
  • "Wasperton"—Coastal Patrol Craft
  • "Invincible"—Anti Submarine Carrier

1984

  • "Glamorgan"—County Class Destroyer
  • "Antrim"—County Class Destroyer
  • "Rothesay"—Rothesay Class Frigate
  • "Torquay"—Type 12 Frigate
  • "Apollo"—Leander Class Frigate
  • "Euryalus"—Leander Class Frigate
  • "Aurora"—Leander Class Frigate
  • "Lowestoft"—Rothesay Class Frigate
  • "Crofton"—Coastal Minesweeper
  • "Yarnton"—Coastal Patrol Craft
  • "Monkton"—Coastal Patrol Craft
  • "Woodlark"—Tender to University Royal Navy Unit
  • "St. David"—Chartered Trawler
  • "Venturer"—Chartered Trawler

Royal Fleet Auxiliary

1980

  • "Lyness"—Stores Support Ship

1981

  • "Tarbatness"—Stores Support Ship
  • "Eddyfirth"—Coastal Tanker
  • "Tidepool" —Fleet Tanker
  • "Stromness" —Stores Support Ship
  • "Bacchus"—Stores Carrier

1982

  • "Pearleaf'—Support Tanker

1983

  • "Tidespring"—Fleet Tanker

1984

  • "Plumleaf"—Support Tanker
  • "Resource"—Fleet Tanker

Notes:

* Now being refitted for training ship role.

†Restored or being restored to service for South Atlantic tasks.

Employment

Training Opportunities Scheme

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what has been the percentage change in the numbers of (a) men and (b) women taking up places on the training opportunities schemes in each of the past three years.

Information on the numbers of men and women taking up places under the training opportunities scheme is not available.

Equal Pay

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what progress Her Majesty's Government have made in implementing the European Economic Community directive on equal pay.

The European Community directive on equal pay is implemented by the Equal Pay Act 1970, as amended by the Sex Discrimination Act 1975.

School Leavers (Islington)

asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many young people in Islington have had no full-time job since leaving school.

Benefit Offices (Islington)

asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many staff are engaged on unemployment benefit work in Islington; and how this number compares with May 1979.

There are 173 staff engaged on unemployment benefit work in Islington at present compared with 87 in May 1979.

Company Closures (Islington)

asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many companies have closed down in Islington since May 1979; and how many jobs have been lost as a consequence.

The information on closures prior to 1981 is not available. In the period January 1981 to March 1982 inclusive, there were 19 closures of establishments, involving 623 redundancies, reported to the Manpower Services Commission as due to occur in the borough of Islington, including provisional figures for February and March 1982.These figures are not comprehensive; they exclude closures affecting fewer than 10 employees.

Unemployment (Islington)

asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) what is the percentage rise in Islington since May 1979 for unemployment generally and for ethnic minorities, the disabled and women, respectively;(2) what were the numbers of unemployed people, ethnic minority, disabled, women and young people, respectively, in Islington on 1 May 1979 and in April 1982.

North-West Norfolk

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the total numbers of unemployed, the numbers of persons unemployed for over a year, and the numbers of individuals on youth opportunities programme schemes for March 1979, March 1980, March 1981 and March 1982 for each of the areas covered by the employment offices at King's Lynn, Hunstanton, Fakenham, Swaffham and Downham Market.

Manchester

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the current ratio of the number of those unemployed in Manchester to the number of registered job vacancies; and what was the corresponding ratio in May 1979.

Company Closures (Manchester)

asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many companies have closed in Manchester since May 1979; and how many jobs have been lost as a result.

There were 141 closures of establishments involving 7,830 redundancies reported to the Manpower Services Commission as due to occur in the city of Manchester during the period May 1979 to March 1982 inclusive, including provisional figures for February and March 1982. These figures are not comprehensive; they exclude closures affecting fewer than 10 employees.

Job Creation (Manchester)

asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many jobs in Manchester are currently being supported by job protection and job creation schemes; and if he will supply a breakdown.

The numbers supported under the Government's special employment measures in the Manchester area are shown in the following table:

Numbers supported
Temporary Short Time Working Compensation Scheme*1,012
Job Release Scheme†868
Youth Opportunities Programme‡13,170
Community Enterprise Programme║1,730
Community Industry¶99
Young Workers Scheme•6,857
Unless otherwise stated, the figures relate to the Manchester travel 10 work' area which comprises Manchester, Altrincham, Beswick, Didsbury, Droylsden, Eccles, Irlam, Longsight, Marple, Middleton, Moss Side, Newton Heath, Preswich, Stockport, Stretford, Swinton, Wilmslow, Worsley and Wythenshawe.

Notes

* The figure relates to the number of potentially redundant jobs

covered in applications that were current in March 1982.

† The number supported at 8 April 1982.

‡The figure relates to the number of entrants on to the Programme between 1 April 1981 and 28 February 1982 in the area covering Manchester, Stockport, Salford and Trafford.

║The figure comprises the number who were on projects funded under the Programme at the end of February 1982 in the area administered by the Manchester East and Manchester West Area Offices of the Manpower Services Commission.

¶ The figure relates to the number of young people participating in the programme at the end of March at the CI unit in Manchester.

• The figure relates to the number of applications approved in the North West region between 4 January 1982 and 31 March 1982.

Unemployment Statistics

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what are the latest unemployment figures in (a) the Greater London area, (b) the Kilburn employment office area, (c) the Wembley employment office area and (d) the Willesden employment office area; if he will give the average period of unemployment and the age breakdown in each case; and what were the figures in May 1979.

[pursuant to his reply, 27 April 1982, c. 243]: Table 1 gives the total numbers registered as unemployed at May 1979 and April 1982 in the areas specified.

Table 3 Age analysis of the numbers registered as unemployed
AgeGreater LondonKilburn employment office area
April 1979January 1982April 1979January 1982
Under 185,67623,4516147
184,63814,8135856
195,31916,58867138
20–2425,36868,891321691
25–2919,64946,607287602
30–3414,50534,831153391
35–4420,06846,799214437
45–498,99720,459107206
50–549,16020,55369182
55–5910,57021,80784164
60–6412,70021,22172146
65 and over489900310
Total, all ages137,139336,9201,4963,070
AgeWembley employment office areaWillesden employment office area
April 1979January 1982April 1979January 1982
Under 183526292485
184918568325
194817976311
20–242419263761,466
25–29166641262970
30–34131432167593
35–44173665297903
45–49124334142439
50–54104304123392
55–59109303113329
60–64169344114247
65 and over539325
Total, all ages1,3544,6141,8336,485

Job Vacancies

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will list by trade and occupation the registered vacancies in (a) the Greater London area and (b) the Brent travel-to-work area in May 1979 and the latest available date.

Information by age and by duration of unemployment is available for January, April, July and October and table 2 gives the median lengths of time on the register at April 1979 and January 1982, the latest available. Table 3 gives an age breakdown at the same dates.

The figures in the tables include school leavers and are not seasonally adjusted.

Table 1 Total numbers registered as unemployed

May 1979

April 1982 (provisional)

Greater London134,050339,350
Kilburn employment office area1,4683,156
Wembley employment office area1,2784,316
Willesden employment office area1,7716,434

Table 2 Median length of time on the register (weeks)

April 1979

January 1982

Greater London2026
Kilburn employment office area2029
Wembley employment office area1624
Willesden employment office area1727

[pursuant to his reply, 28 April 1982, c. 293.]: The following table gives an analysis by broad occupational groups of the numbers of notified vacancies remaining unfilled at June 1979 and March 1982. The figures, which are available quarterly, relate to vacancies notified to employment offices but not to careers offices.

Vacancies notified to employment offices are estimated to be about one-third of all vacancies in the economy as a whole.

Greater London

Kilburn, Wembley and Willesden employment offices

June 1979

March 1982

June 1979

March 1982

Managerial occupations (general management)4034
Professional and related occupations supporting management and administration86658252
Professional and related occupations in education, welfare and health1,4866994021
Literary, artistic and sports1529024
Professional and related occupations in science, engineering, technology and similar fields1,089517309
Managerial (excluding general management)1,3157702929
Clerical and related occupations11,9274,041552168
Selling5,4292,55415085
Security and protective service1,3594882917
Catering, cleaning, hairdressing and other personal service12,5523,90826893
Farming, fishing and related occupations26910151
Materials processing (excluding metal)74197286
Making and repairing (excluding metal and electrical)5,5431,38417250
Processing, making, repairing and related occupations (metal and electrical)6,9211,086426102
Painting, repetitive assembling, product inspecting, packaging and related occupations2,91342415138
Construction, mining and related occupations not elsewhere classified1,531286847
Transport operating, materials moving and storing and related occupations4,91183828955
Miscellaneous occupations (including general labourers)2,90028517814
Total, all occupations61,94418,1842,438701

Scotland

Sentencing

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many persons were sent to prison by courts of solemn jurisdiction for periods of between five and 10 years and over 10 years, respectively, in 1950, 1960 and 1970 and in each of the last five years.

For 1979 the information requested was published in table 13 of "Criminal Statistics Scotland 1979" (Cmnd. 8215); in 1980, 51 persons received sentences of between five and 10 years and 18 received sentences of over 10 years. Figures for 1981 are not yet available.For the years prior to 1979, the information requested could only be provided at disproportionate cost; but details of sentences of between four and seven years, between seven and 10 years, and over 10 years were published in table 13 of the "Criminal Statistics, Scotland" for 1960 and later years. For 1950 an analysis of penal servitude was published, but not of imprisonment.

Table B
1978–791979–801980–811981–821982–3
Standard Penny Rate Product £Actual Penny Rate Product £Standard Penny Rate Product £Actual Penny Rate Product £Standard Penny Rate Product £Actual Penny Rate Product £Standard Penny Rate Product £Actual Penny Rate Product £Standard Penny Rate Product £Actual Penny Rate Product £
REGIONAL AND ISLANDS AREA COUNCILS
Borders289,066166,190296,397168,592260,987172,909246,807169,864260,217170,700
Central782,030730,080801,748729,912708,179700,892672,601684,785707,102740,000
Dumfries & Galloway413,090251,160423,177252,231372,261258,000353,313260,103373,525259,000

As there is no Brent travel-to-work area, figures are given for the area covered by the Kilburn, Wembley and Willesden employment office, witch corresponds closely to the London borough of Brent

Rate Support Grant

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing for each of the years 1978–79 to 1982–83 (a) the national standard amount per capita used in the calculation of resources element of rate support grant, both as originally estimated and as finally determined, and (b) for each local authority, its standard penny rate product and actual penny rate product.

Conclusive calculations of the elements of rate support grant have not been made for the years 1978–79 onwards; the available figures are set out in the following tables:

Table A National Standard amount per capita as estimated for:
(i) the initial calculation of resources element £(ii) the latest calculation of resources element £
1978–792·812·88
1979–802·952·9496
1980–812·702·6115
1981–822·552·48
1982–832·59

1978–79

1979–80

1980–81

1981–82

1982–3

Standard Penny Rate Product £

Actual Penny Rate Product £

Standard Penny Rate Product £

Actual Penny Rate Product £

Standard Penny Rate Product £

Actual Penny Rate Product £

Standard Penny Rate Product £

Actual Penny Rate Product £

Standard Penny Rate Product £

Actual Penny Rate Product £

Fife976,853760,7881,011,940759,633888,354770,278844,046743,356881,071769,432
Grampian1,321,1111,040,4301,369,1861,070,5391,225,2321,067,4781,170,4211,084,4251,250,9711,143,000
Highland546,486354,498556,069377,074497,508382,403474,147392,299497,193416,460
Lothian2,177,9881,801,3292,213,1081,856,4861,960,5261,885,7621,856,5351,883,8271,932,2851,924,419
Strathclyde7,102,9895,079,3747,212,6075,212,8656,348,8215,027,4155,998,6705,189,1836,212,0305,284,284
Tayside1,157,682847,4511,188,483830,6451,048,938844,987989,993825,7101,027,776847,209
Orkney51,88063,50053,67465,00047,357115,00044,714110,00048,853110,000
Shetland58,61499,00063,269150,00057,743300,00055,326311,75567,060276,000
Western Isles85,53930,73187,50034,26077,71336,18173,60936,22979,12537,102
DISTRICT COUNCILS

Borders

Berwickshire51,86928,26852,57428,44846,06728,67043,49229,19547,03229,700
Betrick and Lauderdale94,34956,28596,94557,16086,08558,18481,74857,77285,66957,500
Roxburgh102,99754,870105,80255,46992,70058,00287,43256,37190,90655,600
Tweeddale39,85126,76740,89627,51536,13528,05334,13526,52636,61027,900

Central

Clackmannan138,499107,715141,787109,865125,305103,327119,04796,242124,434105,000
Falkirk414,680426,650425,146430,092375,364423,056356,706401,274374,587445,800
Stirling228,851195,715234,815189,955207,510174,509196,848187,269208,081189,200

Dumfries and Galloway

Annandale and Eskdale100,87257,482103,49058,74591,59860,37187,12562,09492,12461,800
Nithsdale161,813105,464165,847105,651145,168108,169138,072107,999145,172108,100
Stewartry64,82339,78666,09239,71158,40940,57755,20240,78258,66140,500
Wigtown85,58248,42887,74848,12477,08648,88372,91449,22877,56848,600

Fife

Dunfermline

358,860287,853376,850288,908330,365293,493311,974286,067325,866291,946
Kirkcaldy429,077334,644441,189334,945389,268338,201370,758322,330383,783336,289
North East Fife188,916138,291193,901135,780168,721138,584161,314134,959171,442141,197

Grampian

Aberdeen600,019560,183615,195572,459546,297589,748518,045608,652550,484620,000
Banff and Buchan223,546168,883231,968174,596206,886135,797197,673150,925212,194160,000
Gordon158,05481,790168,77687,618154,43994,196149,21295,470164,970100,000
Kincardine and Deeside107,04168,366112,77870,074103,22774,06799,19573,693110,32978,000
Moray232,451161,208240,469165,792214,383173,670206,296155,685212,994185,000

Highland

Badenoch and Strathspey27,72322,58728,26923,43824,69723,36023,27723,96924,64424,790
Caithness78,24433,41982,02237,15270,56537,61767,04238,69170,54939,030
Inverness159,774129,813163,393139,336145,515143,709139,889145,385146,193150,570
Lochaber58,65440,04259,35843,11952,62242,62749,50640,75649,71044,770
Nairn28,88915,88530,00616,36327,18016,39725,77016,83525,58717,500
Ross and Cromarty126,08183,652125,92188,071116,21788,954110,90695,753119,495107,850
Skye and Lochalsh28,63613,08829,76113,48626,19613,66625,10014,46127,04215,110
Sutherland38,48516,01237,33916,10934,51616,07332,65716,44933,97316,840

Lothian

East Lothian228,194164,898232,337161,301205,274168,678194,908166,696206,716171,462
Edinburgh1,336,0981,260,9221,346,5281,304,8721,188,5621,312,6141,122,9591,307,5911,156,0751,336,440
Midlothian245,013133,574248,990134,600221,340140,228210,309140,828212,939142,647
West Lothian368,683241,935385,253255,713345,350264,242328,359268,712356,555273,870

Strathclyde

Argyll and Bute187,525128,021190,842133,643167,820128,957159,429130,127166,244135,294
Bearsden and Milngavie110,09783,975114,71085,710101,35884,32897,17187,620103,91687,902
Clydebank158,89898,987159,942104,060137,97998,931128,62899,838135,67797,312
Clydesdale159,25293,366165,42893,903147,44397,656140,68099,933146,845101,462
Cumbernauld and Kilsyth166,248115,660182,545116,692166,185124,850160,263125,558159,754130,412
Cumnock and Doon Valley135,04359,645137,62561,076120,77762,194113,64162,144114,06662,679
Cunninghame388,964290,167398,217310,392354,388320,863337,238291,474352,222311,244
Dumbarton232,292189,856234,417188,617206,985189,960197,336190,217202,295195,622
East Kilbride244,374176,141246,793185,893217,410178,462205,242191,910214,755192,343
Eastwood146,079105,340150,837106,385134,484107,331128,811108,654140,777109,897
Glasgow2,396,4391,827,0192,388,2291,880,6462,074,3561,740,4461,938,6011,845,0631,987,7111,865,352
Hamilton309,816184,127316,147187,165280,710182,616266,637197,371281,735197,667
Inverclyde297,346218,232303,334212,815267,935205,181250,128220,924261,440218,173
Kilmarnock and Loudoun235,610149,573240,089150,789212,725152,068202,356156,456211,668155,861
Kyle and Carrick325,907246,934331,871252,076294,105253,053278,648260,412290,994263,185

1978–79

1979–80

1980–81

1981–82

1982–3

Standard Penny Rate Product £

Actual Penny Rate Product £

Standard Penny Rate Product £

Actual Penny Rate Product £

Standard Penny Rate Product £

Actual Penny Rate Product £

Standard Penny Rate Product £

Actual Penny Rate Product £

Standard Penny Rate Product £

Actual Penny Rate Product £

Monklands320,124189,628324,733195,836286,338189,432271,208195,379285,250199,443
Motherwell443,295311,701449,994332,599393,963325,340373,877302,465388,241332,491
Renfrew608,014464,155628,819463,109560,256435,994532,126468,586541,792470,494
Strathkelvin237,666146,847248,035151,459223,604149,753216,650155,052226,648157,451
TAYSIDE
Angus258,970167,605271,195166,976239,783171,189227,639163,672239,606170,400
Dundee555,163444,328564,899431,943498,256439,460468,055433,384480,745441,714
Perth and Kinross343,549235,518352,389231,726310,899234,338294,299228,654307,425235,095

Notes

The figures shown are those used in the latest, or in the case of 1982–83 the first provisional, calculation of resources element for each year.