Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 76: debated on Friday 29 March 1985

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Friday 29 March 1985

Wales

Salmon

asked the Secretary of State for Wales what action his Department has taken since 1979 to counter the threat to salmon stocks from (a) illegal netting, (b) predation, (c) pollution, (d) water abstraction, and (e) poaching, respectively; and what action his Department takes to monitor salmon stocks.

In Wales responsibility for the control, maintenance and development of salmon fisheries is vested in the Welsh water authority by the Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries Act 1975. Since 1979 I have confirmed a number of byelaws made by the Welsh water authority to control salmon fishing and protect salmon stocks.The consultation paper on the review of inland and coastal fisheries in England and Wales, published jointly in 1981 by my Department and the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, recognised illegal netting and poaching as a major problem. Reactions to the paper indicated widespread support for some kind of salmon sales control scheme. Subsequently, fisheries departments have reviewed thoroughly the proposals by the salmon sales group of the National Water Council for a salmon-tagging scheme. Serious practical difficulties over the implementation of such a scheme have been identified, including control of imports, the handling of British farmed salmon and the control of tags. These difficulties and other aspects of salmon sales control remain under urgent examination, and an announcement will be made as soon as conclusions are reached.My Department has no evidence that salmon suffer predation in Wales or in Welsh coastal waters to an extent which would justify specific action.The Welsh water authority's statutory responsibilities require the striking of a suitable balance between its water abstraction, pollution control, fisheries and amenity functions. Where there is a game fishery, particular attention is given to ensure that discharges to the river do not adversely affect the fishery. For abstraction, the aim is to ensure that water levels do not reduce to the point where fish stocks are harmed. As part of the implementation of the Control of Pollution Act 1974, my Department, along with the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, has in January this year issued a booklet entitled "Code of Good Agricultural Practice," designed to minimise the risks of pollution from farming practices and to give guidance on good agricultural practice for the purposes of section 31(2)

(c) of that Act.

In order to monitor salmon stocks, fisheries scientists from the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food collect and collate data supplied by the water authorities relating to both restocking and catching—by all means —of salmon. Data for 1983 will be published shortly in the fisheries laboratory data research series, and a copy will be placed in the Library of the House.

Council Tenants (Subsidy)

asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is the average central Government subsidy per council tenant by county in Wales.

Based on returns made by local authorities to the Welsh Office, the average central Government subsidy per council tenant by county in 1984–85 is as follows:

Average subsidy pa per tenant £
ClwydNil
Gwynedd4
Dyfed47
Powys47
West Glamorgan10
Mid Glamorgan27
South GlamorganNil
Gwent106

asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is the average local authority subsidy per council tenant by district in Wales.

Based on returns made by local authorities to the Welsh Office, the average local authority subsidy—that is, rate fund contribution—per council tenant by district in 1984–85 is as follows:

Average subsidy per annum per tenant £
Alyn and Deeside2
ColwynNil
DelynNil
GlyndwrNil
RhuddlanNil
Wrexham Maelor29
Carmarthen39
CeredigionNil
DinefwrNil
LlanelliNil
PreseliNil
South Pembrokeshire14
Blaenau Gwent3
IslwynNil
MonmouthNil
NewportNil
Torfaen17
AberconwyNil
Arfon5
DwforNil
Meirionnydd8
Ynys MônNil
Cynon Valley48
Merthyr Tydfil67
OgwrNil
Rhondda244
Rhymney Valley12
Taff Ely38
Brecknock2
MontgomeryNil
RadnorNil
Cardiff11
Vale of Glamorgan13
AfanNil

Average subsidy per annum per tenant £

Lliw ValleyNil
Neath11
SwanseaNil

New College, Cardiff

asked the Secretary of State for Wales, pursuant to his answer of 25 March, Official Report, column 6, what is his estimate of the number of jobs which will be created if the offer of a payment of an £80,000 grant to New College, Cardiff, is taken up; and what conditions he has attached to the offer of this grant.

For reasons of commercial confidentiality, the number of jobs promised by the project and the terms and conditions attached to the grant offer cannot be disclosed.

Job Creation

asked the Secretary of State for Wales whether, for the purposes of grant paid under the Industrial Development Act 1982 in respect of job creation, he draws any distinction between those classified as employed or self-employed and if, in the case of the latter, any grant is paid direct to those persons whose jobs have been so created.

The appraisal of applications for regional selective assistance under the Industrial Development Act 1982 involves detailed scrutiny of the employment associated with each project. Assistance is related only to jobs provided by the applicant company or firm as a direct consequence of the project.Payment of grant is made to the company or firm carrying out a project and not to individual employees.

Sir Melvyn Rosser

asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will list all those appointments held under his patronage by Sir Melvyn Rosser since 1979.

I have not appointed Sir Melvyn Rosser to any public body in Wales for which I am the responsible appointing Minister. I was consulted by the chairman of the Manpower Services Commission prior to Sir Melvyn's initial appointment as chairman of the MSC Committee for Wales in 1980, and on his reappointment in 1983.

Residential Homes

asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will estimate the total number of people employed by local authorities in Wales from 1980 to the latest available date in connection with their duties under the Residential Homes Act 1980.

asked the Secretary of State for Wales what additional resources have been made available to local authorities in Wales to enable them to meet their responsibilities under the Residential Homes Act 1980 for each year of its operation.

No additional resources were made available specifically. Local authorities were expected to meet the cost of their responsibilities under the Act within their total budgets for personal social services. Under current legislation, the Registered Homes Act 1984, there has been a substantial increase in the fees payable by those seeking registration; the level of these fees is to be reviewed in the light of operational experience.

asked the Secretary of State for Wales what expenditure has been incurred by his Department for each year since 1980 on the administration of the Residential Homes Act 1980 or on any matters arising from the Act.

asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many applications for registration have been refused and how many licences revoked per county in Wales under the Residential Homes Act 1980 during each year of its operation.

asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many old persons' homes have been registered per county in Wales under the Residential Homes Act 1980, for each year of its operation.

The information requested is given in the following table:

Number of registered Private and Voluntary old persons' homes at 31 March
Local Authority1981198219831984
Clwyd52596685
Dyfed43710
Gwent55711
Gwynedd27273143
Mid Glamorgan3469
Powys1244
South Glamorgan10131210
West Glamorgan56911

Education And Science

Black Children (Nottingham)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what information he has about the number of black children suspended from schools in the Nottingham area; how this compares with the national average; and if he will make a statement.

The Government do not collect information on school pupils on an ethnic basis; nor are there national figures about suspensions from schools.

University Visitor

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether he proposes to introduce any changes in the role of the university visitor; and if he will make a statement.

My right hon. Friend has no power to determine the role of the university visitor. He is aware of the problems the hon. Member has in mind and is awaiting the outcome of the consideration being given by the CVCP to these and other matters.

Member's Correspondence

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science when he expects to be in a position to reply to the letter sent to him by the hon. Member for Birkenhead on 19 December 1984 concerning the son of Mr. Francis Joseph McKeown.

Northern Ireland

Youth Training

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will list the projects by name and indicate the number of trainees in each youth training programme and the action for community employment scheme, together with the amount of public money advanced annually to each scheme operating in Larne borough which is funded by the Department of Economic Development.

The following organisations are sponsoring projects in Larne borough:

Youth Community Projects (YCP)
Name of sponsorNumber of approved training placesMaximum annual grant aid £
Northern Ireland Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders (Larne)2424,100
Action for Community Employment (ACE)
Name of sponsorNumber of approved jobsMaximum grant aid for any period of 52 weeks £
Age Concern—Larne Branch12,480
Cairndhu Golf Club19,700
Drumalis Retreat Centre520,170
Glenarm Improvement Group29,390
Larne Congregational Church14,400
Larne Community Hall12,950
Larne Football Club14,690
St. Anthony's and St. McNissi's Youth Clubs419,260

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will list the projects by name and indicate the number of trainees in each youth training programme and the action for community employment scheme, together with the amount of public money advanced annually to each scheme operating in Carrickfergus borough which is funded by the Department of Economic Development.

The following orgainsations are sponsoring projects in Carrickfergus borough:

Youth Community Projects (YCP)
Name of sponsorNumber of approved training placesMaximum annual grant aid £
Carrickfergus YMCA (North Eastern Education and Library Board)1048,400

Name of sponsor

Number of approved training places

Maximum annual grant aid £

Northern Ireland Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders (Whitehead)2382,500

Action for Community Employment (ACE)

Name of sponsor

Number of approved jobs

Maximum grant aid for any period of 52 weeks £

Barn United Football and Recreation Club29,310
Carrickfergus Congregational Church14,660
Carrickfergus Methodist Church24,910
Carrickfergus Golf Club29,300
Carrickfergus Sailing Club29,700
Carrickfergus YMCA734,740
Enterprise Carrickfergus Ltd1676,190
Federation of Ulster Local Studies15,360
First Presbyterian Church Carrickfergus14,910
Joymount Presbyterian Church14,660
Railway Preservation Society525,600
Sunnylands Youth Centre14,660
St. Colman's Parish Church14,660
St. Nicholas Parish Church29,830
Whitehead Golf Club313,620
Whitehead youth Centre14,400
Woodlands Presbyterian Church14,660
Carrickfergus Borough Council366,090

Youth Training Programme (YTP)

Name of Provider

Number of places

Funding 1984–85 Financial year £

Carrickfergus Youth and Community Workshop Ltd85298,673

Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs

Famine (Petition)

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement in response to the petition on famine conveyed to him by the hon. Member for Welwyn Hatfield on behalf of constituents.

The Government are committed to providing emergency aid to Ethiopia and other famine stricken countries throughout 1985 and beyond. As was clear at the recent Geneva conference, our partners in the European Community, other donors and United Nations agencies share that commitment. Our humanitarian assistance is given without conditions, and our policy is to provide it to those in need wherever they may be. Within the limit of the resources available, we continue to improve the volume and impact of our longer term development aid to Africa through all appropriate channels.

Prime Minister

International Youth Year

asked the Prime Minister how much money Her Majesty's Government have allocated and what activities are planned in respect of International Youth Year; and how much of this applies specifically to (i) unemployed and (ii) ethnic minority youth; and if she will make a statement.

Total grant aid to the national coordinating committees in the United Kingdom is expected to be some £300,000. Many activities in Government programmes have relevance to the objectives of the year, including existing grants in connection with youth participation, support of a visit of 250 young people from 22 European countries, programmes in respect of the young unemployed and those from ethnic minorities. The youth training scheme also has particular relevance.

European Community (Spain And Portugal)

asked the Prime Minister if she will ensure that, before Parliament is asked to approve the accession of Spain and Portugal to the European Economic Community, details of all of the additional costs and any loss of benefit to the United Kingdom are made available to Parliament.

Most recent Commission estimates suggest that at the end of transition enlargement will represent a cost to the Community budget as a whole of between 0·1 per cent. and 0·2 per cent. of the VAT own resources base annually. It is not yet possible to estimate actual costs and benefits to the United Kingdom. Because of the Fontainebleu abatement mechanism, the United Kingdom will pay around 7 per cent. net of the additional costs to the allocated Community budget arising from enlargement.

Mr Peter Levene

asked the Prime Minister if, pursuant to her answer of 21 March, Official Report, column 571, she will list the organisation from which the secondment of Mr. Levene was considered.

Defence Procurement

asked the Prime Minister whether, in the coming year, any official of the defence procurement section will be involved in vetting or awarding contracts in which United Scientific Holdings and related companies have an interest.

Any bids received in the coming year from United Scientific Holdings and its subsidiary companies for Ministry of Defence contracts would be vetted and examined by officials of the procurement executive in the normal way, but, as I have already made clear, Mr. Peter Levene would not be involved.

asked the Prime Minister what steps are being taken to avoid any potential conflict of interest for the new Chief of Defence Procurement in vetting and awarding tenders to United Scientific Holdings and other related companies after April 1986.

Mr. Levene has resigned his directorships in United Scientific Holdings and all of its subsidiaries. He has disposed of his own and his immediate family's shareholdings in United Scientific Holdings.

asked the Prime Minister what steps are being taken to avoid any potential conflict of interest for the new Chief of Defence Procurement in vetting and awarding tenders to members of the Defence Manufacturers Association.

Mr. Levene has resigned his directorships in United Scientific Holdings and all its subsidiaries. He has no formal connection with them or any other defence contractor whatsoever. He holds no shares in any Ministry of Defence contractor in the United Kingdom or overseas.

Public Expenditure

asked the Prime Minister (1) if she will cause to be published in the Official Report a table showing for the last year for which figures are available the sums of money spent on (a) roads and road improvement, (b) sewerage, (c) new housing, housing repairs and house modernisation, (d) hospital and health service building works, (e) education building, (f) new works on airstrips, (g) harbours and repairs and (h) modernisation of such facilities.(2) if she will cause to be published in the

Official Report a table showing for the last year for which figures are available the sums spent on (a) roads and road improvement, (b) sewerage, (c) new houses, housing repairs and house modernisation, (d) hospital and health service building work, (e) education building, (f) new work on airstrips, (g) harbours and repairs and (h) modernisation of such facilities in Scotland.

[pursuant to her reply, 27 March 1985]: The information requested is set out in the following table, which should be read with its footnotes.

Public Expenditure in Certain Categories,* 1983–84 (£ million)
Great BritainScotland
(a) Roads and road improvements†2,762365
(b) Sewerage‡28854
(c) New houses, housing repairs and house modernisation≑6,081921
(d) Hospital and health service building work¶65090
(e) Education building•63382
(f) New work on airfields▪29019
(g) Harbours and repairs⋆711
Notes:
* The information in the table is consistent with that in the public expenditure White Paper (Cmnd. 9428).
† Includes structural maintenance and repair expenditure.
‡ The amount spent on modernisation is estimated at £210 million of the total.
≑ Comprises gross expenditure, capital and current: receipts from council house sales have not been deducted.
¶ Represents health authorities' expenditure on hospitals and new building. Modernisation expenditure cannot be readily distinguished.
• Modernisation expenditure cannot be readily distinguished.
▪ Includes both civilian and defence facilities. Figures on airstrips and modernisation cannot readily be distinguished.
⋆ Excludes public corporations' maintenance and repairs expenditure.

The Arts

Sponsorships

asked the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State answering in respect of the Arts if he

Business SponsorshipIncentive Scheme Award Winners Arts BodySole/Principal Sponsor(s)
November 1984Filmhouse, EdinburghArthur Bell and Sons plc
National Museum of Photography Films and TelevisionYorkshire Television
British American Arts AssociationEndless Holdings
Leeds Leisure ServicesLeeds Permanent Building Society
Natural History MuseumIBM (UK) Ltd.
National Jazz CentreBP
Royal Academy of ArtsTrafalgar House
Barbican Arts GalleryPeter Stuyvesant Foundation
Arts Council of Great BritainCitibank
Ballet RambertLloyds Bank
Northern Arts*Lloyds Bank
Bristol Festival for Children*Bristol Evening Post
January 1985Chichester Festival TheatreNissan (UK) Ltd
Heron International plc and The British Printing and Communication
Royal Opera HouseCorporation plc
Royal Philharmonic OrchestraBankers Trust Company
Welsh National OperaAmoco (UK) Exploration Company
Royal Exchange TheatreMobil Oil Company Ltd.
Northcott TheatreCanon (South West) Ltd.
Theatrical Management AssociationBarclaycard
Haddo House Choral and Operatic Society*Mobil North Sea Ltd.
Colchester Arts Centre*Royal London Mutual Insurance
Darlington Civic theatreTerry's of York
March 1985Commonwealth InstituteIBM Area South
Palace Theatre, ManchesterNorwest Holst Ltd.
British Film InstituteThorn—EMI
London Festival BalletBarclays Bank
Royal Photographic SocietyKodak Ltd.
Courtauld InstituteArthur Andersen Foundation
Ironbridge Gorge Museum*Lloyds Bank plc
National Motor Museum TrustWincanton Group Ltd.
Yorkshire Contemporary Art GroupRank Xerox Ltd.
English National OperaBritish Olivetti Ltd.
Wavendon Allmusic PlanTesco Stores Ltd.
Western Orchestral Society LtdCitibank
Birmingham Hippodrome*PMG Investments Ltd.
Sadlers WellsPrudential Assurance
Battersea Community Arts Centre Trust Ltd.*ICL and Adams Falla Associates
London Symphony OrchestraICI Petrol chemicals and Plastics Division, Nikon (UK) Ltd. and Creditanstalt Bankverein
Tolly cobbold/Eastern Arts National Exhibition Committee*Tolly Cobbold
Midlands Arts Centre*Central Independent Television plc
Hanover Band*Cepharex Ltd.
National TheatreArthur Andersen Foundation
Bath Festival*Phillips Fine Art Auctioneers
Kendal Brewery Arts Centre TrustLegal and General Group plc
Polka Children's TheatreJ. Sainsbury's plc
Scottish OperaF. J. C. Lilley plc
Opera '80National Westminster Bank plc
Arts and Museums Division Bradford Metropolitan CouncilChristie's International
City of CardiffAllied Steel and Wire Ltd.
Billingham International Folklore FestivalICI Agricultural Division
Northern Sinfonia*ICI Agricultural Division
South Hill Park Arts Centre and Wilde Theatre*Wickens Building Group Ltd., BMW and Lloyds Bank
National Art Collections FundLex Services plc
Mayfest*Tennent Caledonian Breweries Ltd.
Merseyside Arts*Unilever plc
National Youth Choir of WalesESSO Exploration and Production (UK) Ltd.
Arts Express*BP

will list the number of outside businesses which have placed investments in arts spheres within the framework of his business sponsorship incentive scheme for the arts.

By the end of this month, awards under the business sponsorship incentive scheme will have been made to 57 arts organisations in respect of £2·5 million of new sponsorship. The following companies were involved:

Notes:

* Signifies the principal sponsor(s) in cases where one or more smaller sponsors also contributed to the arts activity. The awards are listed in order of the size of the sponsorship.

National Finance

Multi-Fibre Arrangement

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many Customs and Excise officials have specialised in the implementation and enforcement of the multi-fibre arrangement and other textile trade regulations in each year since 1979.

Since 1982, six Customs and Excise headquarters officials have specialised in the implementation of the multi-fibre arrangement; previously the figure was five. All officials responsible for enforcing controls on imported freight are expected to take account of the MFA and other controls relating to the textile trade, but it is not known whether any specialise in this work. In addition, since 1980 Customs investigation division has deployed a team of around 10 specialist investigators devoted to licensing matters generally.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many prosecutions of importers have taken place in each year from 1982 for the fraudulent importation of textile and clothing goods in circumvention of the quotas agreed under the multi-fibre arrangement.

Companies and individuals prosecuted each year from 1982 for the fraudulent or attempted fraudulent importation of goods in circumvention of quotas agreed under the multi-fibre arrangement are as follows:

Number
198219
19833
19846
19852
* To date.
Since 1983, Customs normal policy has been to offer to compound proceedings in all but the most blatant cases of fraud. A significant number of cases are, therefore, settled out of court. However, to identify the number of cases involved would involve a disproportionate use of resources.

Taxation And National Insurance

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will now update his answer to the hon. Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr of 27 March 1984, Official Report, column 109, by giving information about the reductions in the basic rate of income tax which would be necessary to restore tax payments to their 1978–79 levels in 1985–86.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the estimated yield from all sources of taxation, including excise and other duties, for 1985–86; what was the comparable yield for 1978–79 revalued at 1985–86 prices; and if he will publish a breakdown by categories of the real increase in taxes between 1978–79 and 1985–86, similar to that in his answer of 28 March 1984, Official Report, column 206.

The estimated total yield of taxes, local authority rates and national insurance contributions is £138 billion in 1985–86; the yield in 1978–79 revalued at 1985–86 prices using the GDP deflator is £109 billion. The other information requested is in the table.

£billion 1985–86 prices
Change on 1978–79
Income tax-0·4
Non North Sea corporation tax
North Sea taxes*+12·4
Capital taxes and stamp duty+0·6
NIC—employees+4·4
NIC—employers+1·1
NIS-3·9
LA rates+2·8
Taxes on expenditure+11·8
Total change†+29·0
* Before advance corporation tax set-off.
Components do not sum to total because of rounding.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will provide information on the net income after income tax, national insurance contributions and child benefit at (a) actual prices and (b) equivalent 1984–85 prices of typical household units (i) single, (ii) married couple, (iii) married couple with two children and (iv) married couple with four children, whose earnings from work are equivalent to the following points on the male earnings distribution: (1) lowest decile, (2) median and (3) highest decile for each year since April 1978.

Information in the following tables is based on estimates of earnings for those in full-time work paid at adult rates, with pay unaffected by absence. Estimates are based on information from the new earnings surveys.Income tax rates and allowances for April 1979 are those specified in the Finance Act 1979, later replaced by those announced in June 1979; for other Aprils, they are the rates and allowances for the financial year immediately following. Taxpayers are assumed to have no reliefs or allowances other than the appropriate personal allowance. National insurance contributions are at the contracted-in rate.The calculations take no account of means-tested benefits to which those at the lowest decile may be entitled. Changes in the purchasing power of net earnings have been calculated by reference to movements in the general index of retail prices between Aprils.

Earnings after income tax, National Insurance Contributions and Child Benefit

At current prices

At constant (April 1984) prices

At constant prices (April 1978=100)

At current prices

At constant (April 1984) prices

At constant prices {April 1978=100)

£

£

£

£

Single man

Married man

At the lowest decile gross earnings

April 197839·3570·71100·042·8476·98100·0
April 197944·0971·98101·847·9078·20101·6
April 198053·4771·70101·457·9277·66100·9
April 198157·6769·0297·662·1174·3496·6
April 198261·9567·7695·867·0373·3295·1
April 198366·9170·3799·572·7376·5099·4
April 198474·4374·43105·381·0781·07105·3

At the median of gross earnings

April 197856·29101·15100·059·78107·42100·0
April 197963·94104·39103·267·75110·60103·0
April 198078·52105·29104·182·96111·24103·6
April 198185·56102·39101·290·00107·71100·2
April 198293·00101·73100·698·8107·2899·9
April 1983100·64105·85104·6106·47111·97104·2
April 1984116·19116·19114·9122·82122·82114·3

At the highest decile of gross earnings

April 197885·50153·64100·088·99159·92100·0
April 197996·89158·17102·9100·70164·39102·8
April 1980123·64165·78107·9128·08171·74107·4
April 1981139·36166·79108·6143·81172·10107·6
April 1982151·76166·00108·0156·84171·55107·3
April 1983165·83174·41113·5171·66180·53112·9
April 1984196·55196·55127·9203·18203·18127·0

Married man with two children

*

Married man with four children

At the lowest decile gross earnings

April 197848·7187·53100·055·1599·11100·0
April 197955·9091·26104·363·90104·32105·3
April 198065·9288·38101·073·9299·11100·0
April 198171·6185·7097·981·1197·0797·9
April 198277·5384·8096·988·0396·2997·1
April 198384·4388·80101·496·13101·11102·0
April 198494·0794·07107·5107·07107·07108·0

At the median of gross earnings

April 197865·65117·97100·072·15129·66100·0
April 197975·75123·67104·883·75136·72105·4
April 198090·96121·97103·498·96132·70102·3
April 198199·50119·08100·9109·00130·45100·6
April 1982108·58118·77100·7119·08130·25100·4
April 1983118·17124·28105·3129·87136·58105·3
April 1984135·82135·82115·1148·82148·82114·8

At the highest decile of gross earnings

April 197894·86170·46100·0101·36182·15100·0
April 1979108·70177·46104·1116·70190·51104·6
April 1980136·08182·46107·0144·08193·19106·1
April 1981153·31183·47107·6162·81194·84107·0
April 1982167·34183·04107·4177·84194·52106·8
April 1983183·36192·84113·1195·06205·15112·6
April 1984216·18216·18126·8229·18229·18125·8

* Both children under 11.

Two children under 11, one child 11–15, one child over 16.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the comparison between the yield in real terms in 1978–79 and what he is now proposing for 1985–86 in (a) direct taxes including national insurance and (b) indirect taxes.

The information is in the following table:

Changes on 1978–79
£ billion, 1985–86 prices
Direct taxes*+16·9
Indirect taxes+12·1
+29·0
* Including employees' NICs.
Including employers' NICs.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will construct an index, with 1978–79 equalling 100, of the changes in the level of income tax and national insurance contributions for each subsequent year for a taxpayer on (a) two thirds, (b) average, (c) five times average and (d) 10 times average earnings for households where the taxpayer is (i) single, (ii) married, (iii) married with two children and (iv) married with four children, and in all cases assuming that the wife does not work, in the manner of the answer of 23 November 1983, Official Report, column 171–2.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will construct an index with 1978–79 equalling 100, of the changes in the level of income tax and national insurance contributions for each subsequent year for a taxpayer on (a) half, (b) two thirds, (c) average, (d) five

Multiple of average earnings
HalfTwo-thirdsOneFiveTen
(a)(b)(a)(b)(a)(b)(a)(b)(a)(b)
Single
1978–7923·6100·027·6100·031·5100·052·2100·067·5100·0
1979–8022·9102·626·3103·529·7104·442·8121·651·4151·9
1980–8124·7103·527·7104·930·7106·344·3122·552·1154·6
1981–8226·9100·129·6101·732·3103·546·4117·353·2150·5
1982–8327·3100·330·2101·733·0103·245·9119·453·0152·5
1983–8427·0104·530·0105·733·0107·145·1125·752·5159·5
1984–8526·4107·829·6108·832·7110·045·2128·452·6163·1
1985–8626·1109·829·3110·832·5111·945·3129·952·7165·2
Married
1978–7916·0100·022·0100·027·8100·050·5100·066·5100·0
1979–8016·0101·721·2102·726·3103·841·5120·350·7149·7
1980–8117·9102·722·7104·127·3105·742·9121·251·5152·4
1981–8220·898·725·1100·529·3102·545·2115·852·6148·1
1982–8320·899·425·4100·929·8102·544·6118·052·3150·2
1983–8420·1104·024·9105·329·6106·743·7124·351·9157·3
1984–8519·2107·724·2108·729·1109·943·8127·251·9160·9
1985–8618·7109·923·9110·828·9111·843·9128·851·9163·1
Married with 2 children (both under 11)
1978–792·5100·011·7100·020·9100·048·8100·065·6100·0
1979–801·4102·810·3103·319·0104·240·0119·150·0147·9
1980–814·9102·513·0103·520·8105·141·6119·850·8150·4
1981–827·399·515·0100·722·5102·543·9114·751·9146·3
1982–836·9100·615·0101·522·8102·843·2116·951·6148·4
1983–845·9105·514·3106·222·5107·242·3123·251·2155·4
1984–854·8109·313·5109·721·9110·542·3126·151·2159·1
1985–864·5111·213·3111·521·8112·342·4127·651·2161·2
Married with 4 children (two under 11, one 11–15 and one over 16)
1978–79-11·7100·00·4100·013·3100·046·7100·064·6100·0
1979–80-13·2103·1-0·6102·711·6103·638·5117·449·3145·6
1980–81-8·1101·73·3102·014·3103·840·3117·750·2147·8
1981–82-6·299·54·999·915·8101·742·5112·951·3143·9
1982–83-6·9101·04·7100·915·9102·341·8115·150·9146·0
1983–84-8·3106·13·7105·815·3106·840·9121·450·4152·9
1984–85-9·7109·92·7109·314·7110·240·9124·350·4156·5
1985–86-9·7111·52·6111·014·6111·841·0125·850·5158·6

Mortgage Interest (Wales)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the average mortgage interest tax relief per owner occupier by county in Wales.

times and (e) 10 times average earnings for households where the taxpayer is (i) single, (ii) married, no children (iii) married with two children and (iv) married with four children, in all cases assuming the wife does not work.

[pursuant to his reply,21 March 1985, c. 603]: The following table shows (a) income tax plus national insurance contributions less child benefit, where appropriate, as a percentage of gross earnings; and (b) real net income after income tax, NIC and child benefit in index number form with 1978–79 equalling 100. The calculations assume that the taxpayer has no reliefs other than the appropriate personal allowance and that national insurance contributions are at the contracted-in rate. Average earnings ae those for full-time males paid at adult rates whose pay was not affected by absence. Figures for 1984–85 and 1985–86 are provisional.

Gross Domestic Product

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list regional gross domestic product per head, expressed as a percentage of the United Kingdom average for each year since 1978.

Finance Bill

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer when the Finance Bill will be published.

Scotland

Broadleaved Woodland

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if the Forestry Commission will give an undertaking to meet the national voluntary conservation organisations concerned about broadleaved woodland before 8 May.

The views of the major voluntary conservation bodies have been clearly presented to the Forestry Commission, which does not feel that there is a need for special meetings with them before the seminar on 8 May.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what action has been taken to ensure that an agreement is reached between the Forestry Commission and the Nature Conservancy Council regarding management guidelines for broadleaved woods.

Discussions are continuing between the Forestry Commission and the Nature Conservancy Council on these management guidelines.

Felled Woodland (Replanting)

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish a table showing the areas of felled woodland which have been replanted by the Forestry Commission in each of the last 10 years, and also showing the percentage of that area which has been planted with each of the main tree species.

Forestry Policy (Seminar)

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if the Forestry Commission will invite Friends of the Earth, Scotland, to take part in its seminar on forestry policy on 8 May.

The Forestry Commission has been concerned to keep the numbers of persons attending the seminar within manageable proportions in order to ensure a constructive discussion. The bodies invited represent a balanced cross-section of interests. In these circumstances, the commission does not propose to issue any further invitations.

Housing

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many new houses were started in Scotland in the last six months for which figures are available; and how many were started in the similar period for each of the last five years.

The information requested is shown in the following table and refers to the period 1 July to 31 December each year.

Period July to December

Number of dwellings started

197911,629
19806,805
19816,832
19828,810
19839,232

*1984

8,450

* Estimate.

Salmon Stocks

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what action his Department has taken since 1979 to counter the threat to salmon stocks from (a) illegal netting, (b) predation, (c) pollution, (d) water abstraction, and (e) poaching, respectively; and what action his Department takes to monitor salmon stocks.

The principal measures taken are as follows:

  • (a)Illegal netting: The ban on drift net fishing for salmon in the sea off Scotland has been continued and enforcement of that ban by the Fishery Protection Service has been stepped up with considerable success. Power has been taken in the Inshore Fishing (Scotland) Act 1984 to prohibit the carriage by British fishing vessels in Scottish waters of certain types of nets used mainly for illegal fishing. Power has also been taken to prohibit fishing for salmon in the sea by specified nets set from the shore.
  • (b)Predation: Licences have been issued under the Conservation of Seals Act 1970 for defensive shooting of seals at salmon net fishing stations during close seasons and under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 for the shooting of cormorants, goosanders and mergansers to prevent serious damage to salmon fisheries.
  • (c)Pollution: The prevention of pollution of Scottish rivers is a matter for the river purification boards, but the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland has an ongoing research programme to measure the effects of acid deposition and afforestation on freshwater ecosystems. In 1983 the Scottish Development Department published "Water Pollution Control in Scotland: Recent Developments" which reported continuing progress in the field of water pollution control. The report concluded that 99 per cent. of Scottish rivers were now unpolluted or of fairly good quality.
  • (d)Water Abstraction: Legislation governing the supply and resource protection of waters, together with the power to control the supply of water during periods of drought was consolidated and reaffirmed by the Water (Scotland) Act 1980. Certain problems regarding abstraction were identified by the Scottish River Purification Advisory Committee in its 1978 report on the control of water abstraction. My right hon. Friend intends to introduce legislation as soon as the parliamentary timetable permits to simplify the control provisions in the Spray Irrigation (Scotland) Act 1964 and to extend its application to other forms of irrigation.
  • (e)Poaching: We have been reviewing Scottish salmon and freshwater legislation and administration with interested organisations. Efforts by district salmon fishery boards and the police to control river poaching continue unabated and there were 324, 411 and 395 prosecutions in 1981, 1982 and 1983, respectively. The final figures for 1984 are not yet available but are thought to be approximately 320. We are considering possible systems of salmon sales control as a means of reducing illegal fishing in the rivers and in the sea.
  • (f)Monitoring of Salmon Stocks: Research into the state of salmon stocks is carried out at the Freshwater Fisheries Laboratory, Pitlochry. This includes a comprehensive system of catch recording and sampling. Exploitation rates are measured by tagging experiments. Detailed investigations are carried out on selected rivers.
  • Terrorism (Deaths)

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the number of deaths which have occurred in Scotland in the years 1983 and 1984, respectively, connected with the present civil unrest in Northern Ireland; and how many of those deaths were caused by action taken by the police and each of the known terrorist or paramilitary groups.

    Agricultural Land (Rating)

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish his Department's most recent estimate of the likely yield of rating on agricultural land.

    Agricultural land is by statute excluded from valuation for rating. Valuations on which any estimate of rate yield could be made are not, therefore, available.

    Local Authorities (Debts)

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish in the Official Report the amount of expenditure on debt charged in respect of past borrowings authorised by central Government in each local authority in Scotland and give the percentage which this represents.

    Since 1975 Scottish local authorities have not required the Secretary of State's consent to borrow for capital expenditure purposes. Figures are not available for the current cost to local authorities of borrowing authorised by the Secretary of State before that date.

    Housing Benefit (Rating Expenditure)

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish in the Official Report the amount of rating expediture in each of the district and islands authorities in Scotland on housing benefit and give the percentage of expenditure which this represents.

    The information is as follows:

    AuthorityHousing Benefit Expenditure*Col. (1) As percentage of total expenditure
    District Councils£000Per cent.
    Borders
    Berwickshire634·5
    Ettrick and Lauderdale1134·5
    Roxburgh1454·6
    Tweeddale434·5
    Central
    Clackmannan1323·0
    Falkirk7264·2
    Stirling2222·1

    Authority

    Housing Benefit Expenditure

    *

    Col. (1) As percentage of total expenditure

    District Councils

    £000

    Per cent.

    Dumfries and Galloway

    Annandale and Eskdale903·4
    Nithsdale1323·5
    Stewartry573·6
    Wigtown864·4

    Fife

    Dunfermline5074·4
    Kirkcaldy4903·1
    North East Fife1091·9

    Grampian

    Aberdeen5331·6
    Banff and Buchan1882·9
    Gordon1342·8
    Kincardine and Deeside601·9
    Moray1572·6

    Highland

    Badenoch and Strathspey385·2
    Caithness602·1
    Inverness1462·5
    Lochaber542·6
    Nairn202·3
    Ross and Cromarty1072·4
    Skye and Lochalsh222·1
    Sutherland362·4

    Lothian

    East Lothian3253·6
    Edinburgh2,1913·9
    Midlothian2893·5
    West Lothian4553·7

    Strathclyde

    Argyll and Bute2962·9
    Bearsden and Milngavie451·2
    Clydebank1471·5
    Clydesdale1362·4
    Cumbernauld and Kilsyth801·3
    Cumnock and Doon Valley2093·9
    Cunninghame3111·9
    Dumbarton980·9
    East Kilbride480·6
    Eastwood521·2
    Glasgow4,5402·8
    Hamilton5564·0
    Inverclyde2991·9
    Kilmarnock and Loudoun1141·1
    Kyle and Carrick3462·4
    Monklands4202·6
    Motherwell5902·9
    Renfrew7812·6
    Strathkelvin1601·5

    Tayside

    Angus2773·6
    Dundee5581·9
    Perth and Kinross2802·9

    Islands

    Orkney320·2
    Shetland570·1
    Western Isles1250·4

    Notes:

    * The information is based on authorities' budget estimates for 1984–85.

    For both islands and district authorities housing benefit expenditure shown in column (1) is housing benefit administration costs on rent rebates and rent allowances (including any central administration costs allocated to this expenditure item) and rate fund contributions towards the payment of rent rebates and allowances. The figures for islands authorities also include administration costs (including central administration) on rate rebates.

    ‡ Total expenditure against which housing benefit expenditure has been measured in percentage terms in column 2 is total expenditure relevant for rate support grant purposes, including loan charges, total rate fund contributions to the housing revenue account and total rate fund contributions to other non-relevant services (including rent rebates and allowances).

    Health Boards

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list his responsibilities for Scottish health boards under the National Health Service.

    My right hon. Friend's responsibilities for Scottish health boards are set out in the National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978, as amended principally by the Health Service Act 1980 and the Health and Social Services and Social Security Adjudications Act 1983.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what guidelines he has issued to Scottish health boards on expenditure within the National Health Service on items other than those directly connected with patient care.

    Guidelines to Scottish health boards on matters relating directly to patient care, and to the other services required for the management and support of these services, are contained in circulars and other communicaions issued from time to time by the Scottish Home and Health Department. The guidance on these other services is very extensive, and cannot be summarised briefly.

    Employment

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many manufacturing jobs were (a) lost and (b) created in Scotland in each of the past 10 years.

    The information requested, for the period up to 1981–82, is available from the Scottish Manufacturing Establishments Record* and is set out in the table.

    YearGross employment decrease (Thousands)Gross employment increase (Thousands)Net change in employment (Thousands)
    1974–756634-32
    1975–766337-26
    1976–773941+2
    1977–784629-17
    1978–793023-7
    1979–806017-43
    1980–817919-60
    1981–825925-34
    NOTE: Provisional estimates of the net changes in employees in employment in manufacturing are available from Department of Employment. For 1982–83 and 1983–84 there were decreases of 31,000 and 10,000 respectively.

    * The Scottish Manufacturing Establishments Record (SCOMER) covers all manufacturing units in Scotland with 11 or more employees.

    Electricity

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he has any plans to place a statutory duty on the generating boards in Scotland to produce electricity at the lowest possible price.

    I am satisfied that the boards' existing statutory duties, together with the objectives set by the Secretary of State, are sufficient to encourage the boards to produce electricity in the most economic and efficient way.

    Cumbernauld

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many jobs in the high technology industries have been created; and how many have been lost in each year since May 1979 in Cumbernauld new town.

    [pursuant to his reply, 27 March 1985]: The information requested is not available as there is no accepted definition of high technology industry. The available information for jobs in the electronics industry based on estimates compiled by Cumbernauld Development Corporation, is set out in the following table:

    Net jobs gained (+)/lost (-)
    1979–80+17
    1980–81-606
    1981–82-418
    1982–83-7
    1983–84-49

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many jobs in the paper and board industry have been created; and how many have been lost in each year since May 1979 in Cumbernauld new town.

    [pursuant to his reply, 27 March 1985]: The information is not readily available in the form requested. The available information, based on estimates compiled by Cumbernauld Development Corporation, relates to Order XVIII—Paper, Printing and Publishing —of the standard industrial classification and is set out in the following table:

    Jobs gainedJobs lostNet jobs gained/lost
    1979–80143+11
    1980–81061-61
    1981–821728-11
    1982–83**-32
    1983–84**-4
    * Information not readily available.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many jobs in the engineering industry have been created; and how many have been lost in each year since May 1979 in Cumbernauld new town.

    [pursuant to his reply, 27 March 1985]: This information is not readily available in the form requested, for the years 1982–83 and 1983–84. The available information, based on estimates compiled by Cumbernauld Development Corporation, is set out in the following table:

    Jobs gainedJobs lostNet jobs gained/lost
    1979–80170209-39
    1980–81121662-541
    1981–8297744-647
    1982–83**+27
    1983–84**-55

    * Information not readily available.

    Note:

    The electronics industry is included within the definition of the engineering industry.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many jobs in the clothing industry have been created; and how many have been lost in each year since May 1979 in Cumbernauld new town.

    [pursuant to his reply, 27 March 1985]: The information is not readily available in the form requested, for the years 1982–83 and 1983–84. The available information, based on estimates compiled by Cumbernauld Development Corporation, is set out in the following table:

    Jobs gainedJobs lostNet jobs gained/lost
    1979–8014107-93
    1980–813542-7
    1981–82100556-456
    1982–83**+74
    1983–84**+73
    * Information not readily available.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many jobs in the food industry have been created; and how many have been lost in each year since May 1979 in Cumbernauld new town.

    [pursuant to his reply, 27 March 1985]: The information is not readily available in the form requested, for the years 1982–83 and 1983–84. The available information, based on estimates compiled by Cumbernauld Development Corporation, is set out in the following table:

    Jobs gainedJobs lostNet jobs gained/lost
    1979–80206+14
    1980–81148+6
    1981–82219-17
    1982–83**+57
    1983–84**+46
    * Information not readily available.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many jobs in the distribution industry have been created; and how many have been lost in each year since May 1979 in Cumbernauld new town.

    [pursuant to his reply, 27 March 1985]: The information is not readily available in the form requested, for the years 1982–83 and 1983–84. The available information, based on estimates compiled by Cumbernauld Development Corporation, is set out in the following table:

    Jobs gainedJobs lostNet jobs gained/lost
    1979–8016890+78
    1980–81118200-82
    1981–82129178-49
    1982–83**-153
    1983–84**-105
    * Information not readily available.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many jobs in the construction industry have been created; and how many have been lost in each year since May 1979 in Cumbernauld new town.

    [pursuant to his reply, 27 March 1985]: Information is not readily available in the form requested. The information which is available, based on estimates compiled by Cumbernauld Development Corporation, is set out in the following table:

    Net jobs gained (+)/lost (-)
    1979–80+150
    1980–81-90
    1981–82+38
    1982–83-29
    1983–84+30

    Trade And Industry

    Non-Tariff Barriers

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what steps have been taken to reduce the non-tariff barriers that exist between France and the United Kingdom and the other European Community countries.

    The Council of Ministers has reached agreement on a number of measures identified at the European Council in December 1982 to reduce technical barriers to trade and ease frontier formalities between Community countries.

    Bankruptcies

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many bankruptcies have occurred in the east midlands since May 1979.

    The total number of bankruptcies administered from May 1979 to December 1984 inclusive by county courts in the east midlands was 2,080.

    Kung Fu Weapons (Import)

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will take steps to prohibit the import of the kung fu weapon known as death stars; and if he will make a statement.

    There is no justification for a ban on such imports since the misuse of such articles is adequately covered by existing criminal legislation.

    Tourism

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if, pursuant to the answer of 25 March, he will list the current obstacles to the further success of tourism in Great Britain.

    Manufacturing (Investment)

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will list, by region, the level of investment in manufacturing industry for the years 1979 to 1984, expressed in 1979 prices.

    Exchange Risk Guarantee Scheme

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make a statement about the future of the exchange risk guarantee scheme.

    On 18 December I announced that the exchange risk guarantee scheme for loans from the European Investment Bank and the European Coal and Steel Community would be extended until 31 March 1985. The future of the scheme was to be reviewed in the light of the recently introduced changes in regional industrial policy. That review is nearly complete and I hope to be able to announce the Government's decision shortly. In the meantime, applications for cover under the scheme will continue to be accepted.

    British Overseas Trade Board

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether he is satisfied that the reallocation of British Overseas Trade Board resources since 1979, reducing support for overseas trade fairs and increasing support for the overseas projects fund and the market entry guarantee scheme, has assisted small United Kingdom manufacturing companies to increase their exports.

    [pursuant to the reply, 27 March 1985]: I would expect the changes to BOTB services since 1979 to have helped small United Kingdom manufacturing companies to increase their exports but it is not possible to demonstrate a direct relationship. The market entry guarantee scheme is aimed very specifically at helping smaller firms; the support for trade fairs, gross expenditure on which from 1979 to date has been broadly maintained in real terms, also helps many small firms; and the overseas projects fund, while aimed directly at firms seeking major contracts, benefits a large number of smaller firms associated with the work as subcontractors and in other ways. This scheme's share of the overall budget this year is less than that in 1979–80.

    Transport

    Departmental Achievements

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list his Department's principal achievements since 1979.

    The Government have increased competition in transport to promote better services to customers and greater efficiency.The 1980 Transport Act deregulated the long distance express coach market, leading to a substantial number of new coach services and reduction in fares. The Public Transport Bill will remove restrictions on competition in the provision of local bus services throughout Great Britain (except for the time being in London) while maintaining standards of safety. The structure of the bus industry will be changed, including the privatisation of the NBC, to remove the dominance of very large public sector operators and to allow competitors an opportunity to enter the market. These proposals will end 50 years of protection and reverse the decline of the bus industry.

    The Civil Aviation Act 1980 required the Civil Aviation Authority to give greater emphasis to competition between British airlines and to give users' interests equal ranking with those of airlines. The White Paper, "Airline Competition Policies", underlines the Government's commitment to this policy and the promotion of a sound and competitive multi-airline industry in Britain. We have obtained the agreement of the overseas countries concerned so that British Caledonian's exchange of routes with British Airways can go ahead on 31 March. As a result, British Caledonian will be strengthened and will be better placed to exploit new opportunities. We have also encouraged the development of services at our regional airports; Manchester in particular is becoming a major hub for both domestic and international services, with 17 new routes opening this year, including New York and Hong Kong. The Government have welcomed the Civil Aviation Authority's proposals for liberalising domestic services which, on many domestic routes, should enable airlines to operate in a virtually free market.

    We have carried forward our commitment to the liberalisation of air services within Europe. We welcomed the adoption by the Council of Ministers of the directive on scheduled inter-regional air services although we regretted its limited scope. The Council has now agreed guidelines which, although not as liberal as we hoped, should allow further useful European Community measures to be adopted before too long. In the meantime, we have negotiated with the Netherlands new bilateral arrangements which are by far the most liberal in Europe. This and liberal arrangements we have recently negotiated with the Federal Republic of Germany and Luxembourg are already leading to improved services, lower fares and increased travel. We have secured routes from London to several major European destinations for a second United Kingdom carrier and have opened up the London-Hong Kong route to British Caledonian and Cathay Pacific in addition to the existing British Airways service.

    In other discussions within Europe, the Government have been pursuing vigorously their commitment to liberalise road freight. The European Community has agreed to double the existing quota by 1989 and to work towards the elimination of quota restrictions. We have also achieved significant increases in permits in other bilateral discussions. The Government are continuing to pursue their policy that world shipping markets should be kept open to competition. In particular, we are taking a leading role in the efforts to secure an agreement between the consultative shipping group countries and the United States on competitive access to each other's ocean shipping trades; we will be striving within the European Community to achieve a liberalisation of the internal shipping market on the basis of proposals put forward by the Commission and we will soon be acceding to the United Nations code of conduct for liner conferences in the context of the Community Brussels package.

    We have substantially extended opportunities for the private sector within the transport field. The National Freight Corporation was sold in 1982 to a consortium of its own managers and employees and is now operating more profitably. Associated British Ports has also made a good start in the private sector. We have sold 37 our of 38 English motorway service area leases, earning £50 million and leading to better, more compeitive services to motorists. British Rail's hotel, ferry and hovercraft activities have all been privatised, and more than £300 million of non-operational property has been sold. Legislation has been passed to privatise British Airways. In 1981 the design and supervision work on motorway and trunk road schemes worth over £2,000 million was transferred to private firms of consulting engineers and work on further schemes valued at over £700 million has since been placed with private firms.

    The Government have encouraged a more competitive approach and greater efficiency within the public transport industries. In October 1983 we gave the chairman of the Railways Board clear and realistic objectives for his business. These included achieving a reduction of over 20 per cent. in real terms in the requirement for PSO grant by 1986 while providing attractive and reliable services to customers; we also made clear that we did not wish BR to embark on a programme of major route closures. With our encouragement, BR has established a firm policy on competitive tendering; and it has also drawn up criteria for assessing proposals for the introduction of competition for the provision of support services to the railway.

    The London Regional Transport Act has established a better organisation for public transport in London. I have given the chairman of LRT objectives for his business including more attractive bus and underground services; involvement of other public and private operators; and improving value for money for passengers, ratepayers and taxpayers. I have set a tough but realistic financial target to halve revenue subsidy by 1987–88. The successful drive on efficiency by the new board of LRT has already resulted in a planned reduction in revenue support for 1985–86 by some £60 million, allowing increased investment while holding the ratepayer levy to some £50 million less than the amount of the GLC's budgeted grants to LRT in 1984–85. I have approved the formation of LRT's operating companies—London Bus Limited (LBL) and London Underground Limited (LUL)—which commence trading on 1 April 1985. Better co-ordination between LRT's and British Rail's services for London is being achieved.

    The Transport Act 1983 requires PTEs to invite tenders for operation of any service or ancillary function where suitable, and under other provisions of the Act we have issued statutory guidance to the metropolitan county councils on the level of public transport revenue support so helping to protect ratepayers from unreasonably high public transoprt subsidies.

    We have approved investment to improve services to the travelling public. Since 1979, BR has invested some £2 billion plus about £100 million each year installing continuous welded rail. Major schemes authorised by the Government include the electrification of the ECML and new builds of locomotives, coaching stock, and multiple units. Capital investment by LRT has been increased by some £45 million in 1985–86. An extension of LRT's Piccadilly line to Heathrow terminal 4 is under construction, as is the Docklands light railway costing some £77 million. We have approved the construction and financing of new passenger terminals and other improvements at Heathrow and Gatwick airports; we have also maintained a high level of provision for capital investment at regional airports.

    Progress with the motorway and trunk road construction programme has been very good. The spending cuts in the programme made by the last Labour Administration have been reversed; expenditure is now running at 30 per cent. in real terms above the level in 1979. We have completed more than 480 miles of new national roads, including some 200 miles of motorway, and renewed to modern standards the equivalent of 380 miles of older motorway. Priority has been given to the completion of the M25; the final contracts have been let and the road is on target for completion in 1986. Schemes bypassing 145 towns and villages have been completed and a further 150 bypass schemes are now either under construction or in earlier stages of preparation. Important steps have been taken to promote competition in road construction and maintenance. Fee competition for consultants has been introduced and competition on time taken on site added to price competition for motorway maintenance schemes as an experiment.

    We have also given generous support to local authority spending on roads. Transport supplementary grant has been turned into a capital-only grant for roads expenditure; the 1985–86 settlement covered £320 million of accepted expenditure including 289 major schemes.

    We have taken action to help elderly and disabled people and to draw attention to their transport needs. In May 1983, my Department organised the mobility road show, a motor show for disabled people, which gave them an opportunity to test drive a wide range of cars. A second mobility road show is to be held later this year.

    Good progress has been made in safety and environmental protection. We have introduced a package of measures to improve the safety of the heavy lorry, to make it less environmentally intrusive and to improve its efficiency so minimising the number of lorry journeys. In 1979 and 1984 we introduced noise certification orders giving effect to the latest agreed ICAO aircraft noise certification standards. This policy has contributed to the progressive phasing out by airline operators of non-complying jet aeroplanes and their replacement with quieter ones resulting in a real improvement in the noise climate around United Kingdom airports. We have improved motor cycle training and testing, brought in a new penalty points system for motoring offences, and improved the safety of children in cars. Following a vote in this House we have introduced compulsory front seat belt wearing. We have improved the enforcement of parking regulations and introduced a streamlined and more effective procedure to deal with drinking and driving offences. I have recently announced a review of road traffic law.

    Sealink Ferries (Deaths)

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will set out in the Official Report for each of the last six years, the number of people who have died on Sealink ferries plying to and from British ports in respect of (a) British, (b) Belgium, (c) Dutch and (d) French vessels; and if he will make a statement.

    The number of people who have died on Sealink ferries registered in the United Kingdom is:

    Number
    19799
    19808
    1981*11

    Number

    19825
    19835
    19848

    * includes three deaths on vessels not previously identified as part of the Sealink fleet.

    Information about foreign registered vessels is not available.

    Seafarers' Safety (Persian Gulf)

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport how he proposes to seek to ensure that United Kingdom seafarers on foreign ships with foreign ship owners are informed of the risks of sailing into the Persian Gulf;(2) what steps he proposes to take to seek to ensure the safety and well being of United Kingdom seafarers on foreign ships with foreign ship owners by securing for them the same rights as the seafarers on British ships sailing into the Persian Gulf;(3) what steps he intends to take to seek to ensure that British seafarers are not coerced into sailing into the Persian gulf war zone;(4) what advice he currently offers to shipowners as to circumstances in which they should not send their vessels into the Persian Gulf war zone;(5) if he has any plans to take over from shipowners the responsibility to inform the crews of the dangers of sailing in the Gulf;(6) if, in the light of increased hostilities, he will issue further and more detailed advice to seafarers sailing into the Persian Gulf;(7) what assessment he makes of the requirement for more regular updates and detailed information to seafarers sailing into the Persian Gulf such as location, frequency and effects of attacks on civilian shipping;(8) what action he takes against shipowners who are found to have penalised seafarers for exercising their right not to sail into the Persian Gulf war zone.

    I have periodically issued guidance to United Kingdom shipowners and seafarers' unions on the situation in the Gulf, most recently on 15 February and in these terms:

    The Iran/Iraq conflict continues to present a threat to shipping in the Gulf. The Government's advice to British shipping companies remains that they should consider the latest information on the situation in the Gulf before deciding to send vessels into the area. It is for the companies to inform their crews about the risks involved. Masters should exercise all necessary vigilance whilst in the Gulf.

    I believe that owners and masters are best placed to inform crews of the dangers a voyage to the Gulf may involve and to decide on measures of safety in particular circumstances, and I have no intention of taking over those roles.

    The general guidance I issue is reviewed regularly in the light of the latest reports of attacks on shipping. These attacks are, of course, reported on extensively in the press, by radio and by television, in the United Kingdom and abroad. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office has made arrangements for British seafarers to be able also to obtain advice on current situations from diplomatic posts in the areas of potential danger and the services of consular officials are available to seafarers in the usual way.

    It is British shipowners' normal practice to inform their crews when a voyage will involve a passage within the Gulf, and the National Maritime Board agreement between the General Council of British Shipping and the seafarers' unions affords seafarers an opportunity to leave a ship if they wish to before it enters the designated war zone. The agreement was reached without intervention by me. I have no powers to enforce its continuance, or to require foreign shipowners to enter into similar arrangements.

    Defence

    Departmental Achievements

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list his Department's principal achievements since 1979.

    I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given by my right hon. Friend to my hon. Friend the Member for Welwyn Hatfield (Mr. Murphy) on 9 May 1984 at column 409. Since that date the principal achievements in the field of defence have included the following:

  • (a) we have sustained our role within NATO and our contribution to both the conventional and the nuclear forces of the Alliance;
  • (b) we are continuing to enhance the capailities of our armed forces to discharge the four principal roles we perform within the Alliance. The programme for replacing our Polaris strategic nuclear deterrent with Trident in the mid-1990s is proceeding on schedule. We are enhancing the United Kingdom's own defences through the introduction of new and improved equipment and by strengthening our regular and reserve forces. We are further improving the combat effectiveness, sustainability, and equipment of BAOR and RAF Germany, and have introduced, for example, the Saxon armoured personnel carrier, more Challenger tanks, Milan ATGW and Tornado GR1 aircraft into service. We have ordered a number of vessels for the Royal Navy during the year, including the first type 23 frigate, and are continuing to introduce modern and sophisticated weapons and sensors into the fleet;
  • (c) in concert with our allies, we have taken our part in the modernisation of NATO's intermediate-range nuclear forces, by continuing with the deployment of ground launched cruise missiles in the United Kingdom, following the Soviet Union's failure to accept measures of arms control that would have made this unnecessary. We have also participated in Alliance decisions on shorter-range theatre nuclear weapons that will lead to cuts of one third in the number of nuclear warheads deployed by the Alliance in Europe, resulting in the smallest stockpile in 20 years;
  • (d) in September 1984 we successfully mounted Exercise Lionheart, in which the largest ever deployment of troops from the United Kingdom to BAOR took place, to test procedures for rapidly reinforcing our forces in the central region;
  • (e) we have played a major role in seeking to foster greater co-operation between our European and other NATO partners and have participated fully in the increasingly significant activities of the independent European programme group, the Eurogroup and the Western European Union;
  • (f) we have continued to promote Western defence interests outside the NATO area;
  • (g) we have assisted in famine-relief operations in Ethiopia;
  • (h) we have achieved economies in defence procurement and support activities through the more widespread use of competition in defence contracts, and the privatisation or contracting out of activities. Increased efficiency has been pursued by the continuing transfer of resources from the support areas to the front line, and we have continued the steady reduction in numbers of United Kingdom-based civilian staff;
  • (i) using the powers conferred by the Ordnance Factories and Military Services Act 1984, we have transformed the royal ordnance factories into a company, Royal Ordnance plc, which now operates on a fully commercial basis in the same way as any other company;
  • (j) we introduced, on 2 January 1985, a major restructuring of the central organisation for defence, designed to provide stronger central control of defence policy, operations and resources, while decentralising day-to-day management responsibilities to the services and to the staff of the procurement executive.
  • Defence Expenditure

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence what proportion of gross domestic product is now spent on defence; and how this compares with 1979.

    Expenditure on defence in the current year, based on the United Kingdom definition of the defence budget, is expected to amount to 5·2 per cent. of GDP. The corresponding figure for 1978–79 was 4·4 per cent.

    Raf (Basic Trainer Aircraft)

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will release the information on which the Royal Air Force basic trainer decision was reached.

    As my right hon. Friend explained on 21 March 1985, column 997, cost was the decisive factor in our choice of the Tucano aircraft. However, as my right hon. Friend also explained, we took full account of suitability for the RAF training role as well as the employment opportunities consequent on the RAF order and exports.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he is satisfied that no elements of financial subsidy by the Brazilian Government or by the British Government were contained in the Short Brothers bid to supply the Tucano to the Royal Air Force.

    As my right hon. Friend explained on 21 March 1985, at column 997, cost was the decisive factor in the choice of the Short Brothers Tucano, and the essential first consideration was value for money for the defence budget. Any element of financial assistance in the Shorts bid is a question that should be addressed to the company or to my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence how long he estimates it will take before the re-engined Shorts Tucano will be available for flight testing; whether that aeroplane will be taken to royal aircraft establishment, Boscombe Down, for technical evaluation before signature of any purchase contract; and whether any other design changes are anticipated.

    The re-engined Shorts Tucano will be available for flight testing in about a year.Subject to completion of negotiations, the contract will be signed very shortly, well before the aeroplane is flown to the aeroplane and armament experimental establishment, Boscombe Down. As my right hon. Friend explained on 21 March 1985, at column 1003, such lack of final testing is a common phenomenon in competitions for defence equipment, and there is no likely reason why the Garrett engine will not prove perfectly satisfactory. No other design changes to the aircraft are currently anticipated.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence on what date, during the week commenced 18 March, British Aerospace submitted a final bid to supply the Pc-9 to the Royal Air Force; and what price was quoted in that submission.

    On 19 March. It is not the practice to release details of tender bids which are commercially confidential.

    Mr Peter Levene

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence why Mr. Peter Levene, while chairman of United Scientific Holdings and a senior office-bearer of the Defence Manufacturers Association, was asked to approach defence manufacturers with a view to ascertaining their interest in contracts for managing the royal dockyards.

    Nuclear Tests (Inquiry)

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will take steps to arrange for the medical records submitted to the National Radiological Protection Board as part of its inquiry into the medical consequences of the British nuclear tests in the Pacific in the 1950s, to be made available in summary form before the board completes its report; and if he will make a statement.

    The Ministry of Defence has provided all information required by the National Radiological Protection Board. As stated in my reply to the hon. Member for Eccles (Mr. Carter-Jones) on 21 March 1985, at columns 579–80, service medical records are not required by the NRPB. I understand that it is not the board's intention to produce any form of interim report.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will take steps to make available to the National Radiological Protection Board during its inquiry into the medical consequences of the British nuclear tests in the Pacific in the 1950s the evidence submitted to the Australian Royal Commission examining the same subject.

    The National Radiological Protection Board has been well aware for some time of the considerable bulk of documentary evidence that has been made available to the Australian Royal Commission. It is free to make any use of this information which it considers necessary.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the latest estimate of the date by which the National Radiological Protection Board is expected to have completed its study of the medical consequences of the British nuclear tests in the Pacific in the 1950s.

    It is expected that, as previously announced, the study will be completed in October 1986.

    Employment

    Minis (Departmental Benefits)

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what estimated financial benefits have been achieved in his Department in 1984–85 by the financial management initiative system.

    In line with the two White Papers on financial management in Government Departments — Cmnd. 9058 of September 1983 and Cmnd. 9297 of July 1984—and the published reports on implementation in my Department, considerable progress is being made in introducing new systems to meet the objectives of the financial management initiative.Much has already been done to increase cost-consciousness with top management review bodies supervising and strengthening efforts to improve efficiency and economy throughout the Department of Employment group. Comparing 1983–84 and 1984–85, the unemployment benefit service, for example, is increasing productivity with the ratio of numbers on its register to staff improving from 114:1 to 122:1; and output per staff unit in the employment division of the Manpower Services Commission is rising from 534 job placings to 615. There are similar improvements in vacancies notified, training applications taken and employment rehabilitation centre throughput. The net cost per person no longer unemployed by virtue of various employment measures has also fallen significantly. The Department of Employment group expects to have reduced permanent staffing by some 2,000 posts between April 1984 and April 1985 with roughly equal numbers coming from the Manpower Services Commission and the rest of the group.For the future, the new systems will be used increasingly both to control costs better and to set challenging, yet practical, targets for achieving better value for money from the resources at our disposal.

    Youth Training Scheme

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what evidence there is in the survey of youth training scheme providers reported to the last meeting of the Manpower Services Commission's youth training board suggesting that the number of adult workers employed to supervise trainees on mode A of the scheme differs significantly according to the occupational training family of the trainees; and whether he will summarise such evidence.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) what new specific vocational opportunities he intends to introduce into the youth training scheme; and what initiatives he plans to promote, to extend the involvement of the private sector and charities in the community programme;(2) on what factors he bases his estimation that once the second year of training announced in the Budget in respect of the youth training scheme is operational all school leavers under the age of 18 years will have access to a job, training or further education.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will list region by region the number of companies which presently employ school leavers under the age of 18 years within the framework of the youth training scheme.

    Labour Statistics

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the rate of employment in the service industries in the east midlands as compared with the national rate.

    In September 1984, the latest date for which information is available, it is estimated that of the 1,419,000 employees in employment in the east midlands, 755,000 or 53 per cent. were employed in the service industries. The corresponding proportion for Great Britain was 64 per cent.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the level of unemployment in Derbyshire at the latest available date; and what was the comparable figure in May 1979.

    The following information is in the Library. On 14 February 1985 the number of unemployed claimants in Derbyshire was 49,681. It is difficult to make a comparison with May 1979, because of the change in the basis of the count in October 1982, the 1983 Budget provisions which mean that some men, mainly aged 60 or over, no longer need to sign on at the unemployment benefit offices to receive benefit, and the change to a ward-based sytem for allocating claimants to localities. The number of registered unemployed in jobcentre areas approximating to Derbyshire in May 1979 was 14,988.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many 18 to 24-year-olds were unemployed in the east midlands in 1979 and 1984.

    The following information is in the Library. The table shows figures for registered unemployed in the east midlands in October 1979, for unemployed claimants in October 1984, and figures for October 1982 on both bases.The comparison is affected by the change in the basis of the unemployment count in October 1982.

    Unemployment in East Midlands—18 to 24 years of age
    Numbers
    Unemployed registrants
    October 197924,332
    October 198257,697
    Unemployed claimants
    October 198254,021
    October 198462,309

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the rate of youth unemployment in the east midlands at the latest available date.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people in the east midlands have been unemployed for more than one year at the latest available date.

    The following information is in the Library. On 10 January 1985, the latest date for which an analysis of unemployment by duration is available, a total of 76,783 claimants in the east midlands region had been unemployed for over one year.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people became unemployed in the east midlands between December 1983 and December 1984.

    The following information is in the Library. In the period between December 1983 and December 1984, on average 23,900 claimants became unemployed each month in the east midlands region, while an average of 22,800 claimants per month ceased to be unemployed.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people were unemployed in the east midlands in 1979 and 1984; and what was the rise in the rate of unemployment in that period.

    The following information is in the Library. The average number of unemployed claimants in the east midlands region in 1984 was 193,400 representing an unemployment rate of 12·1 per cent. The corresponding estimate for 1979 was 70,900, an unemployment rate of 4·4 per cent.The comparison is affected by the 1983 Budget provisions which means that some men, mainly aged 60 years and over, no longer need to sign on in order to receive supplementary benefits or national insurance credits. It is estimated that some 14,600 men in the east midlands were affected.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will list, for the latest available date, the current level of unemployment for the 16 to 19 age group by region, and the percentage of the total regional unemployment which this represents.

    The following information is in the Library. The figures relate to unemployed claimants on 10 January 1985, the latest date for which an analysis of unemployment by age is available.

    Unemployment by region—Under 20 years of age
    RegionNumber unemployedPercentage of region total
    South-East121,79915·3
    East Anglia14,24317·2
    South-West34,87716·3
    West Midlands60,95417·1
    East Midlands34,42616·7
    Yorkshire and Humberside57,25018·4
    North-West80,23017·4
    North43,11217·7
    Wales33,77818·2
    Scotland71,60619·8
    Northern Ireland19,38915·7

    Wages Councils Orders

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the approximate number of employers governed by wages councils orders in the east midlands at the latest available date.

    On 1 January 1985 there were 16,500 employers on the Wages Inspectorate's register in the midlands east division.

    Agricultural Workers

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment whether he will publish in the Official Report the amount paid out in redundancy payments to agricultural workers each year since 1970 and the numbers affected.

    Separate figures are not available for this industry. Figures for the agriculture, forestry and fishing industries combined are as follows:

    Amount paid £ millionNumber of employees
    19721·14,313
    19730·93,118
    19741·13,038
    19751·84,334
    19762·24,742
    19772·13,743
    19782·33,599
    19792·53,316
    19804·34,670
    19816·57,197
    19826·16,065
    19837·16,291
    1984*1·81,477
    * 1st Quarter.

    Parental And Family Leave

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the policy of Her Majesty's Government towards the proposed European Community directive on parental and family leave; and if he will make a statement.

    The Government believe that the matters covered by the draft directive are best dealt with between employers and employees according to their own priorities, needs and circumstances, rather than by Government or Community intervention. The Government are also concerned at the potential costs and administrative burdens such a measure would impose on employers and believe that measures of the kind envisaged in the draft directive are not priorities for additional public expenditure.My Department is today consulting interested parties on the draft directive, and I shall report the outcome to the House.

    Textile Industry

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) what evidence has been sent to him or to the Manpower Services Commission regarding skill shortages in the textile industry generally, and specifically in hosiery and knitwear; and what discussions are being held with employers and trade unions to seek to overcome any obstacles to the recruitment of labour;(2) whether he will request the Manpower Services Commission to send a task force to Leicester to prepare a report for him on the difficulties for employers in the hosiery and knitwear industry in filling vacancies for skilled workers; and whether he will request an early report on this matter.

    I am aware of the concerns expressed by my hon. Friend and have seen the reports in the Leicester Mercury.

    I have therefore asked the Manpower Services Commission to look into the issue as a matter of urgency and to report to me as quickly as possible. Following this investigation, it will be for the commission, in consultation with employers and trade unions, to decide what needs to be done to tackle any problems it may identify in this area. I will, of course, keep my hon. Friend fully informed about developments.

    Wages Councils

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what research he has conducted into the effects of wages councils on employment prospects.

    I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for Birmingham, Ladywood (Ms. Short) on 21 February 1985 at column 516.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what consultations he intends to seek with representatives of the Confederation of British Industry to discuss the expected effects of abolition of wages councils on work forces.

    My right hon. Friend issued a consultative paper on 21 March setting out broad options for the future of wages councils and seeking views by the end of May. The Confederation of British Industry is amongst the bodies from which comments are being sought.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will list (a) the proportion of female and male workers covered by each wages council order and (b) the proportion of full-time and part-time workers covered by each wages council order.

    The information requested is not available for each wages council. It is estimated that about four fifths of workers covered by wages councils are female and that about two thirds of workers are part-time.

    International Labour Convention 26

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment from what bodies he has invited responses to the consultative paper which he issued recently before taking his intended decision in June to deratify International Labour Convention 26.

    My right hon. Friend has invited a number of bodies representing employers' and employees' interests, as well as other interested organisations and individuals, to comment on the options for the future of wages councils set out in the consultative paper. My right hon. Friend is consulting the Confederation of British Industry and the Trades Union Congress on the Government's proposal to deratify International Labour Convention 26.

    Overtime

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what information he has about the current levels of overtime worked in each of the industries covered by wages council orders.

    I refer the hon. Member to tables 14, 15, X1 and 47 of the "New Earnings Survey 1984." Copies are available in the Library.

    Miners (Unemployment Benefit)

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many cases involving the refusal of unemployment benefit to miners dismissed during and after the recent strike, have been brought to the Mention of the adjudication officer by his Department; what action has been taken in those cases where the adjudication officer has made a ruling; and if he will make a statement.

    The information about the number of cases is not readily available and can be obtained only at disproportionate cost. The subsequent action taken on benefit claims would depend upon the decision given by the adjudication officer.

    Unemployed Young Persons

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment whether discussions have taken place between his Department and the Manpower Services Commission over financial responsibility for unemployed 16 and 17-year-olds; and if he will make a statement.

    Environment

    Equal Opportunities Officer

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will now appoint a departmental equal opportunities officer with responsibility for coordinating the Civil Service policy of non-discrimination within his Department.

    Two such officers were designated for my Department in November 1984, one of them with specific responsibilities for staff in the Property Services Agency.

    Rate Support Grant

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will give the accumulated reduction in rate support grant since 1978–79 in England at 1985–86 prices breaking down the figures between (a) 1978–79 and 1979–80, (b) 1978–79 and 1980–81, (c) 1978–79 and 1981–82, (d) 1978–79 and 1982–83, (e) 1978–79 and 1983–84, (f) 1978–79 and 1984–85 and (g) 1978–79 and 1985–86.

    Rate support grant in England at 1985–86 prices for the years 1978–79 to 1985–86 was as follows:

    £ million
    1978–7912,226
    1979–8011,733
    1980–8111,623
    1981–8210,196
    1982–839,565
    1983–849,205
    1984–858,585
    1985–868,489

    Merseyside Development Corporation

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish the latest data on the expenditure to date by the Merseyside development corporation; and if these data can be divided as to whether the expenditure was undertaken on the Liverpool or Wirral side of the Mersey.

    The expenditure to date by the Merseyside Development Corporation is £76·4 million. Of this amount, £73·3 million has been spent on the Liverpool side of the Mersey and £3·1 million on the Wirral side. I continue to seek ways to resolve the difficulties over those parts of the Birkenhead docks which lie within the MDC's designated area.

    Construction (Expenditure Statistics)

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what information he has concerning per capita expenditure on construction in the latest year for which figures are available in United States dollar equivalents in the following countries: the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Japan, the Federal Republic of Germany and the United States of America.

    Play Projects

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the Government's policy on funding permanent play projects under the traditional urban programme with particular reference to (a) existing play projects when they become time expired and (b) new play projects submitted for funding under the traditional urban programme.

    It is for local authorities to consider the long-term revenue funding of projects which they submit for initial support under the traditional urban programme. The urban programme offers capital resources, and revenue support for a limited term. When projects become time expired, they may be resubmitted for a further period of support. Applications for both new and time expired projects are considered on their merits against alternative possible uses for the available funds in terms of the extent to which they address special needs, the priority given them by the local authority, and the level of deprivation locally.

    Local Government Reform

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will make a statement about the arrangement for the transfer of the property rights and liabilities of the Greater London council and metropolitan county councils to successor authorities on abolition.

    I have today deposited in the Library of the House a copy of a memorandum containing the Government's proposals for the transfer of property rights and liabilities of the GLC and metropolitan county councils. This reflects the principles set out in the White Paper, "Streamlining the Cities" (Cmnd. 9063), and developed in "the Yellow Book" of July 1984.Copies have been sent today to the local authorities concerned, and to other interested bodies, with a request for comments by the end of April. Further copies of the memorandum are obtainable from my Department.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will make a statement about the future of the Greater London council's central purchasing unit in the event of the abolition of that council.

    In my statement in November about common specialist services, I said that their future was in the hands of successor authorities, but that my Department would use its good offices in considering how worthwhile services could be maintained if there was a demand for this.It is clear that there is a general interest in the provision of a central purchasing service, probably under the aegis of ILEA, but equally that there are other practicable arrangements which are being considered.The new ILEA will need to make its own purchasing arrangements. It could well be in its interests to continue to supply others, including London boroughs which have been using the unit. It would take some time for these authorities to set up other purchasing arrangements and they will soon need to start taking decisions. The Government hope that ILEA will open discussions with them as soon as possible, in the interests of the staff concerned and before the viability of the present unit comes into question.My Department and that of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Education and Science continue to stand ready to use their good offices to that end.

    Ministers' Offices (Staffing And Maintenance)

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what has been the total cost of staffing and maintenance of Ministers' offices in his Department for each year since 1979–80.

    [pursuant to his reply, 28 March 19851: The estimated total cost (at 1984–85 prices) of staffing Ministers' offices in the Department of the Environment for each year since 1979–80 is as follows:

    £ million
    1979–800·858
    1980–810·880
    1981–820·831
    1982–830·771
    1983–840·817
    1984–850·879

    Home Department

    Detention Centres

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will give details of the treatment that detention centre inmates will receive during the first week of their sentence under the extended short, sharp shock regime.

    Copies of a note summarising the main features of the new regime were placed in the Library and the Vote Office on 13 February 1985.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether the Home Office will be monitoring the effect of the extension of the short, sharp shock regimes to all detention centres.

    The new regime in detention centres is being covered under the general arrangements for operational oversight and statistical monitoring of young offender establishments.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the categories of offenders sentenced to periods at detention centres who will be excluded from the short, sharp shock regime.

    The new regime is in operation in all detention centres in England and Wales. All new receptions at detention centres have a thorough medical examination, and where an inmate appears to be unfit the medical officer is able to direct what restrictions should be placed on his activities or, if necessary, arrange for his admission to