Skip to main content

Inner Cities (Deprivation)

Volume 79: debated on Thursday 16 May 1985

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will give the rankings of the indices of deprivation of each of the inner city partnership authorities in relation to all English and Welsh authorities.

The information requested is shown for England in the table. Information about Welsh authorities is not available on a comparable basis.

Rank Position on Absolute and Percentage Values on Key Indicators—Derived from 1981 Census Data
Partnership Authorities
BirminghamGatesheadHackneyIslingtonLambethLiverpoolManchesterNewcastleSalford
Unemployment
Absolute128315021231523
Percentage(17)(23)(15)(33)(36)(5)(8)(22)(23)
Overcrowding
Absolute13915378232142
Percentage(17)(33)(2)(14)(9)(23)(21)(38)(50)
Single Parents
Absolute16213316432125
Percentage(24)(118)(1)(6)(2)(16)(4)(55)(29)
Pensioners
Absolute142626326451018
Percentage(131)(97)(97)(73)(120)(77)(42)(42)(42)
Amenities
Absolute110915217238249
Percentage(79)(279)(5)(9)(11)(28)(25)(300)(117)
Ethnic
Absolute12209266551961103
Percentage(18)(320)(3)(13)(6)(146)(39)(107)(181)
Population Change
Absolute3371094121914
Percentage(27)(38)(7)(3)(5)(10)(8)(18)(15)
Low Skill
Absolute135485229352420
Percentage(43)(46)(51)(57)(131)(13)(17)(99)(17)

Notes:

(1) Absolute values relate to the number of persons (or households) for a particular indicator.

(2) Percentage values relate to the proportion of the population (or households) for a particular indicator.