asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list in the Official Report the outturn amount of expenditure for 1983–84 and 1984-85 in each of the inner city and urban programme areas of inner city programme expenditure and distinguishing in each case between capital and revenue and voluntary and statutory sectors.
[pursuant to his reply, 10 June 1985, c. 358]: Outturn information by authority is not yet available for 1984–85. Outturn figures do not distinguish between spending on statutory, as opposed to voluntary sector, projects. The latest outturns on which grant may be paid for partnership or programme expenditure in 1983-84 are as follows (all £ million to one decimal place):
| Partnerships | Capital | Revenue |
| Birmingham | 16·2 | 8·0 |
| Hackney | 8·2 | 4·3 |
| Islington | 5·8 | 4·1 |
| Lambeth | 4·8 | 6·1 |
| Liverpool | 14·6 | 10·4 |
| Manchester/Salford | 16·2 | 7·3 |
| Newcastle/Gateshead | 15·8 | 5·3 |
| Docklands | 3·2 | 1·6 |
| Programmes | ||
| Blackburn | 1·5 | 0·1 |
| Bolton | 3·5 | 0·9 |
| Bradford | 3·2 | 2·7 |
| Brent | 0·9 | 0·5 |
| Coventry | 1·4 | 0·3 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 2·9 | 2·7 |
| Kingston upon Hull | 4·5 | 0·8 |
| Knowsley | 0·8 | 0·2 |
| Leeds | 3·2 | 1·4 |
| Leicester | 4·2 | 2·3 |
| Middlesbrough | 4·4 | 1·2 |
| Nottingham | 3·6 | 1·8 |
Partnerships
| Capital
| Revenue
|
| Oldham | 3·8 | 0·6 |
| Rochdale | 1·8 | 0·3 |
| Sandwell | 2·9 | 0·2 |
| Sheffield | 2·6 | 1·9 |
| Sunderland | 2·9 | 0·6 |
| Tower Hamlets | 1·1 | 0·2 |
| North Tyneside | 2·7 | 0·7 |
| South Tyneside | 3·5 | 0·8 |
| Wandsworth | 1·0 | 0·7 |
| Wirral | 2·9 | 0·6 |
| Wolverhampton | 4·5 | 1·3 |