Skip to main content

Youth Training Scheme

Volume 87: debated on Tuesday 19 November 1985

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

asked the Paymaster General how many black and white trainees there were on each youth training scheme in the Birmingham and Solihull area at the latest available date.

The Manpower Services Commission. is urgently considering the extent to which information provided by managing agents and sponsors on the ethnic background of trainees on the youth training scheme can be made available. I shall write to the hon. Member as soon as I am in a position to do so.

asked the Paymaster General if he will provide the best available information on the academic qualifications of (a) black and (b) white trainees on entry to the youth training schemes.

Reliable, comprehensive information is not available. I shall, however, write to the hon. Member with the details of some information we have.

asked the Paymaster General if he has any information that would lead him to revise his estimate of nine deaths on the youth training scheme from 1 April 1983 to 30 June 1985, as given to the hon. Member for Bolsover on 23rd October, Official Report, columns 168–170; and if he will make a statement.

No. The nine fatalities referred to in my reply of 23 October included a fatality which occured in Scotland on 26 February this year and which was the subject of a fatal accident inquiry held on 14 November. If the inquiry finds that the death did not arise out of or in connection with a training or work activity, the fatality will not be included in the Manpower Services Commission's future accident figures for the youth training scheme. I will write to the hon. Member when I know the outcome of the inquiry.

asked the Paymaster General if he will list the number of cases in which the families of youth training scheme trainees who died on youth training schemes were sent cheques for £78 by the Manpower Services Commission in lieu of industrial death benefit payments from the Department of Health and Social Security.

Since the youth training scheme was introduced on 1 April 1983, the parents of six young people have been paid the equivalent of industrial death benefit by the Manpower Services Commission. In five cases the maximum payment of £78 was made and in one case a payment of £52 (the maximum for a single parent) was made.

asked the Paymaster General if he will provide the date of death of each youth training scheme trainee since 1 April 1983 and the cause of death in each case.

The following is a list of fatalities on the youth training scheme since 1 April 1983:

Date of Fatality

Cause of Fatality

27 June 1983Road traffic accident
7 September 1983Accident on residential outdoor activity
12 October 1983Forklift truck accident
1 February 1984Tractor accident
27 July 1984Road traffic accident
22 August 1984Road traffic accident
24 September 1984Dumper truck overturned
12 February 1985Severe burns
26 February 1985The outcome of a fatal accident inquiry into this death is awaited to establish the exact cause
29 July 1985Electrocution
20 August 1985Road traffic accident

asked the Paymaster-General (1) what is, by each Manpower Services Commission area, the size of the budget and the allocation of premium places for youth training scheme mode B for the year from April 1986; and how this compares with the provision for each year since the scheme was introduced;(2) what is the total Manpower Services Commission budget for 1986–87 for the provision of mode B youth training scheme places; how many places this is expected to provide; and what were the figures for each of the last two financial years.

It is not possible to break down expenditure by area, but the tables show the allocation by area of approved places in mode B1 community projects and training workshops for 1984–85 and 1985–86 Under the two-year youth training scheme from April 1986 the distinction between modes will disappear, but existing mode 131 providers will generally be eligible for the premium rate of funding. The national planning total of approved first-year premium places for 1986–87 is 51,000 (excluding information technology centres). In addition there will be approved second year places, but their number, and the allocations to areas, have yet to be determined. Planned spending on premium places in 1986–87 is also therefore undecided, but in 1983–84, 84,637 places were approved in community projects and training workshops, and expenditure was some £105 milliom; in 1984–85, 65,195 approved places were planned, and some £217 million spent.

1984–85
AreaTotal Number of Planned Approved Places
Community ProjectsTraining WorkshopsTotal
Glasgow9883451,333
Lanarkshire5784741,052
Renfrew, Dunfermline and Argyll8506901,540
Ayrshire, Dumbarton and Galloway6074431,050
Lothian and Borders575270845
Central and Fife270380650
Grampian and Tayside364152516
Highlands and Islands19498292
Durham5359401,475
Cleveland8946961,590
Newcastle1,0803901,470
South Tyne1,3704651,835

Area

Total Number of Planned Approved Places

Community Projects

Training Workshops

Total

Humberside7455001,245
Leeds1,0603201,380
Bradford6554951,150
Wakefield9303951,325
Sheffield1,0303101,340
Cheshire1,4284421,870
Cumbria19595290
Lancashire1,0751001,175
Manchester Central1,1604901,650
Manchester East280210490
Manchester North7303301,060
Merseyside Inner1,7304952,225
Merseyside Outer1,3079032,210
Birmingham1,9453352,280
Coventry1,0556631,718
Derby7702301,000
Dudley7603851,145
Leicester1,1137001,813
Lincoln363202565
Nottingham9145981,512
Staffordshire1,1323001,432
Telford8421581,000
Wolverhampton1,6003301,930
Gwent600105705
Swansea8302201,050
Cardiff1,2906051,895
Wrexham635345980
Avon1,000801,080
Gloucester8991111,010
Plymouth8532021,055
Taunton600170770
Chatham1,0752501,325
Chelmsford5507501,300
Fareham8072851,092
High Wycombe65040690
Horsham88090970
Ipswich9381921,130
Luton470170640
Reading415115530
London North East6604401,100
London North440250690
London South East6403801,020
London South West260450710
Total45,61619,57965,195

1985–86

Area

Total Number of Planned Approved Places

Community Projects

Training Workshops

Total

Glasgow5824651.047
Lanarkshire5804401,020
Renfrew, Dunfermline and Argyll6456201,265
Ayrshire, Dumbarton and Galloway443472915
Lothian and Borders590275865
Central and Fife320380700
Grampian and Tayside335185520
Highlands and Islands19499293
Durham4709001,370
Cleveland7776731,450
Newcastle8563791,235
South Tyne1,1854501,635
Humberside6905301,220
Leeds9953201,315

Area

Total Number of Planned Approved Places

Community Projects

Training Workshops

Total

Bradford6304701,100
Wakefield8654501,315
Sheffield1,0053301,335
Cheshire1,3384821,820
Cumbria170130300
Lancashire1,0861151,201
Manchester Central1,0615391,600
Manchester East310210520
Manchester North7303201,050
Merseyside Inner1,7654442,209
Merseyside Outer1,1529282,080
Birmingham1,8703952,265
Coventry9165541,470
Derby575320895
Dudley645335980
Leicester9005701,470
Lincoln595595
Nottingham9145581,472
Staffordshire1,3101901,500
Telford8271731,000
Wolverhampton1,1033301,433
Gwent600105705
Swansea8002201,020
Cardiff1,1657251,890
Wrexham630305935
Avon90065965
Gloucester829111940
Plymouth695205900
Taunton610165775
Chatham9152301,145
Chelmsford3707001,070
Fareham7223391,061
High Wycombe52580605
Horsham579165744
Ipswich9222241,146
Luton466138604
Reading415120535
London North East414302716
London North6164001,016
London South East6105501,160
London South West285425710
Total41,49719,60561,102

asked the paymaster-General if he will publish in the Official Report a breakdown of the regional variations which exist of the percentage of youth training scheme places assessed for performance.

[pursuant to his reply, 18 November 1985, c. 38]: The percentage of approved 1984–85 places covered by programmes assessed in each region by the end of July 1985 was as follows:

RegionPlaces assessed per cent.
Scotland97
Northern99
North West97
Yorks and Humberside97
Midlands97
Wales99
South West92
South East96
London95
Great Britain96
One hundred per cent. coverage is not required because some approved places remain unfilled.