Skip to main content

National Dock Labour Scheme

Volume 130: debated on Thursday 31 March 1988

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for Employment how many permanent registered dock workers in the London labour board area in each year from 1980 to 1986 have been dismissed by their employer for an offence justifying summary dismissal under the disciplinary provisions of the dock labour scheme; and how many of these men have been reinstated by order of the local dock labour board and appeal tribunals.

[pursuant to his reply, 14 March 1988, c. 448–49]: The figures requested are as follows:

1980198119821983198419851986
Permanent Workers dismissed for an offence justifying summary dismissal971021
Reinstated by order of London Dock Labour Board and Appeal Tribunals95821
Dismissal upheld by London Dock Labour Board and Appeal Tribunals22

To ask the Secretary of State for Employment how many permanent registered dock workers in the Hull and Goole dock labour board area in each year from 1980 to 1986 have been dismissed by their employer for an offence justifying summary dismissal under the disciplinary provisions of the dock labour

1980198119821983198419851986
Permanent workers dismissed for an offence justifying summary dismissal71211
Reinstated by order of Hull and Goole Dock Labour Board Appeal Tribunals71111
Dismissal upheld by Hull and Goole Dock Labour Board and Appeal Tribunals1
1 The second man in this year left the industry without his case being resolved by the Local Board.

To ask the Secretary of State for Employment how many permanent registered dock workers in the Tyne and Wear local dock labour board area in each year from 1980 to 1986 have been dismissed by their employer for an offence justifying summary dismissal under the disciplinary provisions of the dock

1980198119821983198419851986
Permanent workers dismissed for an offence justifying summary dismissal211
Reinstated by order of Tyne and Wear Dock Labour Board and Appeal Tribunals11
Dismissal upheld by Tync and Wear Dock Labour Board and Appeal Tribunals11

To ask the Secretary of State for Employment how many permanent registered dock workers in the Grimsby and Immingham local dock labour board area in each year from 1980 to 1986 have been dismissed by their employer for an offence justifying summary dismissal under the disciplinary provisions on

1980198119821983198419851986
Permanent workers dismissed for an offence justifying summary dismissal511
Reinstated by order of Grimsby and Immingham Dock Labour Board and Appeal Tribunals.51
Dismissal upheld by Grimsby and Immingham Dock Labour Board and Appeals Tribunals1

To ask the Secretary of State for Employment how many permanent registered dock workers in the West Scotland local dock labour board area in each year from 1980 to 1986 have been dismissed by their employer for an offence justifying summary dismissal under the disciplinary provisions of the dock labour

scheme; and how many of these men have been reinstated by order of the local dock labour board and appeal tribunals.

[pursuant to his reply, 14 March 1988, c. 448–49]: The figures requested are as follows:the dock labour scheme; and how many of these men have been reinstated by order of the local dock labour board and appeal tribunals.

[pursuant to his reply, 14 March 1988, c. 448–9]: The figures requested are as follows:labour scheme; and how many of these men have been reinstated by order of the local dock labour board and appeal tribunals.

[pursuant to his reply, 14 March 1988, c. 448–9]: The figures requested are as follows:

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

Permanent workers dismissed for an offence justifying summary dismissal8931221
Reinstated by order of West Scotland Dock Labour Board and Appeal Tribunals.7931211
Dismissal upheld by West Scotland Dock Labour Board and Appeals Tribunals11