Skip to main content

Tax Allowances

Volume 132: debated on Friday 29 April 1988

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will estimate the number of married couples who will stand to gain in 1990–91 from transferring the married couple's allowance to the wife.

About 600,000 married couples are expected to benefit from transferring the married couple's allowance to the wife in 1990–91.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer by how much the value of income tax personal allowances has increased in real terms since 1979; how this amount has been distributed to each band of income taxpayers, both in total and in amount per taxpayer.

[holding answer 30 March 1988]: With the increases announced in the 1988 Budget, the single and married man's personal allowances will have increased by 26·5 per cent. and 27·6 per cent; respectively, in real terms since 1978–79. The table shows the cost of

Cost of real increases in personal allowances 1978–79 to 1988–89 at 1988–89 income levels and tax rates
Total incomeTotal costGain per taxpayer
SingleMarried coupleAllSingleMarried coupleAll
££ million£ million£ million£££
Under 5,00039050440120130120
5,000 to 10,0006505801,240140220170
10,000 to 15,0002609101,170150270230
15,000 to 20,00070720780140300270
20,000 to 30,00050660710190330310
30.000 to 50,00020270290250380370
Over 50,000108080260390370
All1,4503,2604,710140280220

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish a table showing the reductions in income tax liabilities, at 1988–89 income levels, of the proposed 1988–89 allowances, thresholds and rates, and comparable figures for the 1978–79 regime indexed to 1988–89 showing (a) the number of tax units, (b) the total amount of reductions and (c) the average reduction per tax unit for the top 1 per cent., 5 per cent., 10 per cent. and 20 per cent. of taxpayers and the bottom 1 per cent., 5 per cent., 10 per cent. and 50 per cent. of taxpayers.

[holding answer 30 March 1988]: The information is given in the table. I regret that information for the bottom 1 per cent. and the bottom 5 per cent. of taxpayers is not available. Child tax allowances, which were being phased out in 1978–79, have been excluded from the comparison. The estimates are based on a projection of the 1985–86 survey of personal incomes and are therefore provisional.

Reductions in Income Tax Liabilities in 1988–89 compared with the 1978–79 Indexed Tax Reigime
Point of income distribution 1 in 1988–89 PercentageNumber of units2 paying tax in 1988–89 '000sTotal reduction in tax compared with the 1978–79 indexed regime £ millionAverage3 reduction in tax compared with the 1978–79 indexed regime £ per year
Top 12104,74022,680
Top 51,0507,5207,200
Income Tax and Income Tax + NIC as Percentages of Gross Earnings
Multiples of average earnings
2/312510
Single
1956–57 Tax10·416·624·840·555·2
Tax + NIC14·018·926·041·055·4
1978–79 Tax21·025·029·550·566·6
Tax + NIC27·531·533·752·267·5
1988–891 Tax17·319·924·533·836·9
Tax + NIC26·328·930·136·138·0
Married

these increases, including those for age allowances and the average reductions in income tax liability for single people and married couples at different levels of income. A11 estimates are provisional.

Point of income distribution 1 in 1988–89 Percentage

Number of units2 paying tax in 1988–89 '000s

Total reduction in tax compared with the 1978–79 indexed regime £ million

Average3 reduction in tax compared with the 1978–79 indexed regime £ per year

Top 102,0909,4104,500
Top204,18011,9502,860
Bottom 102,090380120
Bottom 204,180810150
Bottom 5010,4503,310290
All taxpayers20,90020,000910

1 Based on numbers of tax units expected to pay tax in 1988–89.

2 Married couples count as one unit.

2 Based on numbers of tax units liable to pay tax under the indexed 1978–79 regime.