Skip to main content

National Curriculum

Volume 171: debated on Friday 27 April 1990

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Prime Minister whether she will make a statement on the introduction of the arrangements for the national curriculum under the Education Reform Act 1988; and what action is being taken to reduce the burden of form filling by teachers.

We need the national curriculum to raise standards in our schools. There is welcome evidence from Her Majesty's inspectorate that many schools are making satisfactory progress with implementing the national curriculum. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Education and Science is taking

CompanyDate of privatisationNet proceeds to HMC £ million Number of shareholdersProfit/(loss) before privatisation £ million
British Petroleum (residue sale)1979276
19818
1983543
19875,322592,602n/a
British Aerospace19814397,60052·8
1985347
Cable and Wireless1981181170,14664·1
1983263
1985580
Amersham International1982605,8544·8
National Freight Consortium198253145,0004·3
Britoil21982626165,200423·1
1985426
Associated British Ports198346112,0005·5
198451
Enterprise Oil198438210,20783·2
Sealink (trade sale)19843n/a12·8
Jaguar19843441,78950
British Telecom19843,6811,203,243990
British Shipbuilders Warship Yards (trade sale)1984–853n/a18
British Gas198657,7312,695,450782
British Airways198785038,350195

great care that the new requirements are introduced in a way that does not overburden teachers. He has been particularly concerned to limit the paperwork required of teachers and has taken a number of steps to this effect, including, for example, changes to the proposed requirements for statutory curriculum information.