Skip to main content

Coastal Protection

Volume 176: debated on Monday 9 July 1990

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1) if he will make a statement on his Department's role in protecting Southwold, Reydon, Walberswick and surrounding villages from the sea (a) currently, (b) in the next financial year and (c) till the year 2000;(2) if he will make it his policy urgently to assess the criteria for saving domestic dwellings from the sea to take account equally of environmental factors, cost benefits and housing.

A scheme under the Coast Protection Act 1949 to protect Southwold harbour is with the Department for approval. Many additional schemes are being undertaken in this financial year following the winter storms and they also have priority, so some schemes approved this year may be delayed into the next financial year.I am not aware of any plans to protect Reydon, Walberswick and the surrounding villages. However, if a scheme satisfying our normal technical, economic and environmental criteria is submitted to the Department it will be given full consideration.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will bring forward an urgent scheme to compensate people who lost their homes to the sea in cases where environmental considerations outweigh coast protection schemes; and if he will make a statement.

Works carried out to protect land under the terms of the Coast Protection Act 1949 require my prior consent. In deciding whether to give such consent our policy is to require a proposal to be technically sound, cost effective and environmentally sympathetic, and we have no plans to change that policy.We are not aware of any case in which a coast protection authority has decided not to seek our approval

DivisionCounties covered by divisionNumber of items claimed
ChelmsfordEssex, Hertfordshire, parts of Greater London15
HuntingdonBedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire7
LincolnLincolnshire21
NorwichNorfolk and Suffolk22
CreweCheshire, Staffordshire, Shropshire345
NottinghamNottinghamshire, Derbyshire, Leicestershire33
PrestonLancashire, Merseyside, Greater Manchester91
WorcesterWarwickshire, West Midlands, Metropolitan County, Hereford, Worcester35
BeverleyHumberside, South and West Yorkshire44
CarlisleCumbria134
NewcastleNorthumberland, Durham, Tyne and Wear, Cleveland26
NorthallertonNorth Yorkshire82
GuildfordHants, IOW, Surrey, West Sussex, parts of Greater London39
MaidstoneEast Sussex, Kent, parts of Greater London18
OxfordBerkshire, Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire30
ExeterDevon237
GloucesterAvon, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire86

for works because environmental considerations were judged to override protection of homes. No proposal submitted to us has been denied our consent solely by reason of environmental considerations. The Coast Protection Act does not provide for compensation to be paid for losses arising from coastal erosion and we have no plans to change our policy in this respect.