35.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he has any plans to undertake a tour of schools premises within Highland region; and if he will make a statement.
My right hon. Friend has no plans at present to visit Highland region.
£ thousands | |||||
District | 1985–86 | 1986–87 | 1987–88 | 1988–89 | 1989–90 |
(a) Greenock and Port Glasgow | |||||
(i) Total expenditure | 3,327 | 2,318 | 2,554 | 4,282 | 7,245 |
(ii) Percentage of total budget | 3·1 | 2·1 | 2·3 | 3·6 | 5·3 |
(b) Strathclyde | |||||
(i) Total expenditure | 53,570 | 62,669 | 67,392 | 67,652 | 71,252 |
(ii) Percentage of total budget | 49·7 | 57·0 | 59·6 | 56·9 | 51·8 |
Note: The percentage of total budget is based on total expenditure excluding marketing, promotion and running costs. Area expenditure figures also exclude such costs.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list the total amounts paid to projects in (a) Kilmarnock and Loudoun, (b) Dundee, (c) Motherwell and (d) Hamilton districts by the Scottish Development Agency for the years 1986–87 to 1989–90 (i) in cash terms and (ii) as a percentage of total budget.
[holding answer 17 December 1990]: The information is set out in the table below.
District | 1986–87 £'000 | 1987–88 £'000 | 1988–89 £'000 | 1989–90 £'000 |
(a) Kilmarnock and Loudoun | ||||
(i) Total expenditure | 767 | 1,075 | 259 | 550 |
(ii) Percentage of total budget | 0·7 | 1·0 | 0·2 | 0·4 |