Skip to main content

Police Records

Volume 195: debated on Thursday 25 July 1991

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if there is a recommended or statutory period during which police forces should retain interview notes and case documents before they are destroyed;(2) if he will make it his policy to issue guidance that no police interview notes or case documents should be destroyed for as long as a person is imprisoned on conviction of the crime involved;

Table 1
Spouses and fiance (e) in the Indian sub-continent applying for entry clearance for settlement in the United Kingdom
Number of persons or percentage
Husbands
1st quarter2nd quarter1990 3rd quarter4th quarterYear1991 1st quarter
New Delhi (including Calcutta)
Applications received17090806029070
Applications granted26050504020040
Applications refused initially4020304013050
Refusal rate (percentage)3n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.35n.a.
Bombay (including Madras)
Applications received1100705040270100
Applications granted26040603019030
Applications refused initially5040505020040
Refusal rate (percentage)3n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.44n.a.
Dhaka
Applications received1140150160160610130
Applications granted24070605022070
Applications refused initially90701008034060
Refusal rate (percentage)3n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.58n.a.

(3) if he will list the practice of each police force in England and Wales for the retention of interview notes and case documents in serious cases.

There is no such statutory or recommended period. The policy on retention of interview notes and case documents is a matter for each chief officer of police.Information on the practice of individual forces is not held centrally. At present we have no plans to issue guidance to police forces.