Skip to main content

No-Fault Compensation

Volume 204: debated on Tuesday 25 February 1992

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment his Department has made of the working of no-fault compensation schemes; and if he will make a statement.

Total Prescriptions Dispensed by Chemist and Appliance Contractors
FPC Name1989–901990–91
TotalChargeablePercentageTotalChargeablePercentage
Cleveland4,645,593674,50914·54,742,004648,29313·7
Cumbria3,465,124650,96018·83,566,067633,48317·8
Durham4,875,161740,12915·25,005,114708,44114·2
Northumberland2,077,930375,98718·12,135,101365,73517·1
Gateshead1,774,914258,38814·61,791,076244,52413·7
Newcastle upon Tyne2,551,553326,18812·82,585,659312,00012·1
North Tyneside1,838,823251,35313·71,853,674237,06912·8
South Tynside1,441,112171,48711·91,479,724161,01710·9
Sunderland2,898,914342,86611·82,926,604325,00411·1
Northern25,569,1243,791,86814·826,085,0233,635,56613·9
Humberside6,768,7001,027,74215·26,846,640978,06114·3
North Yorkshire4,275,083757,75517·74,389,417740,19816·9
Bradford4,277,766578,66713·54,328,881549,17412·7
Calderdale1,639,454271,69316·61,702,257267,93215·7
Kirklees2,857,411513,38818·02,898,651486,78916·8
Leeds6,013,320930,67815·56,104,747890·51714·6
Wakefield2,759,190438,63715·92,844,187425,10514·9
Yorkshire28,590,9244,518,55915·829,114,7804,337,77614·9
Derbyshire6,487,5471,184,80218·36,624,8631,143,58817·3
Leicestershire6,153,7521,153,4231·876,271,8861,100,90817·6
Lincolnshire3,658,907619,91916·93,757,464584,84615·6
Nottinghamshire7,254,5411,285,19317·77,458,5611,228,87916·5
Barnsley2,191,445279,84212·82,187,861260,12211·9

No full assessment has been made of the working of no-fault compensation schemes, although the Department has noted developments in Scandinavian countries and New Zealand. The question of no-fault compensation was fully debated last year during the NHS (Compensation) Bill. The House decided on a free vote against the measure and the Bill did not receive a Second Reading.