Skip to main content

Local Government Finance

Volume 205: debated on Tuesday 10 March 1992

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list those local authorities awarded a higher standard spending assessment for 1992–93 per unit of population than the metropolitan borough of Rotherham together with their standard spending assessments per unit of population.

The table shows 1992–93 standard spending assessments for those authorities with a higher amount per head of resident population than Rotherham.

Local authorities with a higher standard spending assessment per head of resident population than the metropolitan borough of Rotherham for 1992–93

Local authority

1992–93 SSA (£/head)

City of London11,266
Tower Hamlets1,445
Hackney1,400
Lambeth1,347
Isles of Scilly1,321
Westminster1,272
Newham1,255
Islington1,239
Haringey1,154
Southwark1,151
Hammersmith and Fulham1,151
Brent1,077
Camden1,057
Kensington and Chelsea1,043
Lewisham1,035
Wandsworth1,017
Waltham Forest978
Manchester963
Liverpool937
Greenwich937
Birmingham910
Ealing904
Knowsley897
Hounslow863
Bradford850
Wolverhampton849
Sandwell806
Enfield795
Oldham793
Barking and Dagenham789
Salford779
Croydon775
Coventry775
South Tyneside771
Newcastle upon Tyne766
Cleveland764
Harrow761
Rochdale757
Merton750
Sunderland743
Redbridge739
Kirklees735
Wirral734
Bolton734
North Tyneside725
Walsall724
Gateshead723
St. Helens717
Tameside708
Hillingdon705
Calderdale699
Leeds699
Barnet696
Doncaster694
Trafford693
Sheffield692
Bexley689
Sutton686
Kingston upon Thames684
Rotherham683