Skip to main content

Housing Associations

Volume 222: debated on Thursday 2 April 1992

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, pursuant to his answer to the hon. Members for Oldham, Central and Royton (Mr. Davies) and for

City challenge areaPopulationArea (hectares)Residential dwellingsUnemployment rate (percentage)Forecast training weeks 1993–94
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)
Pacemakers:
Bradford42,9971,40015,18436·017,040
Dearne Valley76,0005,75032,00416·0n/a
Lewisham28,00049412,00020·828,300
Liverpool4,0001381,19627·0n/a
Manchester10,0001105,37531·0n/a
Middlesbrough40,30079215,90020·05,067
Newcastle35,20058020,23625·0n/a
Nottingham25,00040510,40024·410,513
Tower Hamlets13,5001454,07121·8n/a
Wirral29,0006838,88329800
Wolverhampton22,0005606,600n/a13,613
Round 2:
Barnsley17,000850n/a12·5285
Birmingham12,0002655,00026·53,654
Blackburn19,5004006,00022·04,375
Bolton19,5005067,00017·019,894
Brent20,00032010,00030·020,600

Barrow and Furness (Mr. Hutton) of 24 March, Official Report, column 626, when he expects his Department to complete its assessment of the impact of the proposed reduction in average grant levels to housing associations to 55 per cent. in 1995–96 on averge weekly rents for housing association tenants.

Our consideration of evidence put forward by the Housing Corporation, the National Federation of Housing Associations and others about grant rates in 1994–95 and beyond is continuing. Final decisions about grant rates for 1995–96 would not normally be taken until late 1994.