Skip to main content

North East Thames Regional Health Authority

Volume 222: debated on Thursday 2 April 1992

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what amount of public money per head of the population was spent in each of the districts of the North East Thames regional health authority in each of the last five years for which figures are available.

[holding answer 30 March 1993]: The information on revenue expenditure per head of population is shown in the table.

Revenue expenditure per head of population—North East Thames district health authorities—£(cash)
1987–881988–891989–901990–911991–92
Basildon & Thurrock185210230245307
Mid Essex199219237255319
North East Essex202220236247337
West Essex175200222239326
Southend161180199219279
Barking, Havering and Brentwood189207220237343
Hampstead592688729799576
City and Hackney483543574612572
Newham227253273299460
Tower Hamlets485542588613487
Enfield166187200214368
Haringey270293337363449
Redbridge193219235245384
Waltham Forest288328359390448
Bloomsbury and Islington655738791818736

Sources:

(a) Annual accounts of district health authorities (and predecessor authorites in the case of Bloomsbury and Islington)—1987–88 to 1991–92.

(b) Mid-year estimates of resident population—1987 to 1991 (Office of Population, Censuses and Surveys).

Notes:

1. The figures for the DHAs are based upon their total revenue expenditure on the services which they managed or accounted for in the relevant financial years. Those for 1991–92 cover their total revenue expenditure including that on purchases of health care and directly related services, administrative and purchasing functions and other expenditure.

2. Capital expenditure incurred by the DHAs and all expenditure incurred by the North East Thames Regional Health Authority is excluded. Expenditure on family health services, which is accounted for by Family Health Services Authorities and cannot strictly be attributed to particular districts, is similarly excluded.

3. The population figures used make no allowance for residents of particular districts who receive treatment in others. The figures used for mid 1991 are provisional and based on the 1991 census.