To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what were (a) the initial housing investment programme allocations and (b) the housing investment programme bids for each district council in Cumbria in constant 1991–92 prices for each year since 1979.
The available information on housing investment programme bids and allocations is as follows. The table also gives corresponding figures for gross capital expenditure on housing.
Housing Investment Programme (HIP) bids, allocations and gross capital expenditure in Cumbria by district, 1979–80 to 1992–931 | ||||
Allerdale | £ thousands (1991–92 prices) | |||
HIP bids | Initial allocations | Final allocations | Gross capital expenditure2 | |
1979–80 | 17,581 | n/a | 12,610 | 12,299 |
1980–81 | 17,521 | n/a | 8,285 | 9,526 |
1981–82 | 12,589 | n/a | 5,492 | 6,238 |
1982–83 | 10,824 | n/a | 7,513 | 7,251 |
1983–84 | 8,252 | 4,765 | 10,039 | 11,593 |
1984–85 | 8,812 | 4,987 | 5,336 | 5,452 |
1985–86 | 11,704 | 4,100 | 4,100 | 5,537 |
1986–87 | 17,339 | 3,348 | 3,348 | 4,732 |
1987–88 | 10,325 | 3,012 | 3,277 | 4,195 |
1988–89 | 8,700 | 2,274 | 3,133 | 4,199 |
1989–90 | 6,514 | 2,512 | 3,098 | 8,305 |
HIP bids | Allocations | Allocations plus supplementary credit approvals | Gross capital expenditure | |
1990–91 | 7,537 | 3,009 | 3,009 | 5,136 |
1991–92 | 6,125 | 2,656 | 33,741 | n/a |
1992–93 | 6,840 | 3,167 | 33,167 | n/a |
Barrow-in-Furness | ||||
£ thousands (1991–92 prices) | ||||
HIP bids | Initial allocations | Final allocations | 2Gross capital expenditure | |
1979–80 | 9,076 | n/a | 5,331 | 5,876 |
1980–81 | 8,635 | n/a | 4,698 | 4,332 |
1981–82 | 7,290 | n/a | 3,830 | 3,523 |
1982–83 | 4,131 | n/a | 4,281 | 4,268 |
1983–84 | 4,465 | 3,815 | 4,942 | 5,911 |
1984–85 | 7,209 | 3,687 | 4,021 | 7,969 |
1985–86 | 8,953 | 3,154 | 3,154 | 5,648 |
1986–87 | 12,758 | 2,511 | 3,081 | 6,082 |
1987–88 | 12,517 | 2,318 | 3,569 | 6,170 |
1988–89 | 13,934 | 1,751 | 4,353 | 6,547 |
1989–90 | 9,675 | 1,320 | 3,178 | 6,600 |
HIP bids | Allocations | Allocations plus supplementary credit approvals | 2Gross capital expenditure | |
1990–91 | 5,575 | 2,442 | 2,638 | 4,157 |
1991–92 | 4,667 | 1,917 | 31,942 | n/a |
1992–93 | 4,445 | 1,614 | 31,614 | n/a |
Carlisle | ||||
£ thousands (1991–92 prices) | ||||
Year | HIP bids | Initial allocations | Final allocations | 2 Gross capital expenditure |
1979–80 | 12,956 | n.a. | 9,610 | 10,585 |
1980–81 | 11,217 | n.a. | 6,644 | 6,285 |
1981–82 | 10,305 | n.a. | 5,176 | 5,465 |
1982–83 | 10,271 | n.a. | 5,402 | 5,958 |
1983–84 | 8,829 | 4,158 | 5,303 | 7,567 |
1984–85 | 11,118 | 4,599 | 4,599 | 6,413 |
1985–86 | 12,941 | 3,524 | 3,524 | 7,434 |
1986–87 | 14,676 | 3,069 | 3,069 | 8,625 |
1987–88 | 18,522 | 2,589 | 2,721 | 9,680 |
1988–89 | 17,440 | 2,046 | 2,348 | 8,869 |
1989–90 | 16,299 | 1,451 | 2,085 | 11,618 |
Year | HIP bids | Allocations | Allocations plus supplementary credit approvals | 2Gross capital expenditure |
1990–91 | 14,638 | 4,880 | 5,426 | 7,486 |
1991–92 | 16,882 | 4,301 | 35,454 | n.a. |
1992–93 | 17,957 | 5,225 | 35,225 | n.a. |
Copeland | ||||
£ thousands (1991–92 prices) | ||||
HIP bids | Initial allocations | Final allocations | 2Gross capital expenditure | |
1979–80 | 9,294 | n/a | 8,064 | 7,388 |
1980–81 | 13,823 | n/a | 5,671 | 4,705 |
1981–82 | 10,494 | n/a | 5,366 | 5,415 |
1982–83 | 5,131 | n/a | 4,610 | 4,538 |
1983–84 | 4,741 | 3,384 | 3,916 | 5,429 |
1984–85 | 6,832 | 3,436 | 3,436 | 4,903 |
HIP bids | Initial allocations | Final allocations | 2Gross capital expenditure | |
1985–86 | 6,597 | 2,668 | 2,668 | 5,740 |
1986–87 | 11,920 | 2,303 | 2,303 | 4,917 |
1987–88 | 7,114 | 1,961 | 2,196 | 9,465 |
1988–89 | 7,438 | 1,493 | 1,970 | 9,557 |
1989–90 | 6,128 | 1,067 | 2,299 | 8,881 |
HIP bids | Allocations | Allocations plus supplementary credit approvals | 2Gross capital expenditure | |
1990–91 | 4,284 | 2,038 | 2,038 | 3,211 |
1991–92 | 6,262 | 1,515 | 31,731 | n/a |
1992–93 | 9,012 | 1,623 | 31,623 | n/a |
Eden | ||||
£ thousands (1991–92 prices) | ||||
HIP bids | Initial allocations | Final allocations | 2Gross capital expenditure | |
1979–80 | 2,949 | n/a | 2,503 | 1,909 |
1980–81 | 3,271 | n/a | 2,299 | 2,113 |
1981–82 | 3,514 | n/a | 2,180 | 1,933 |
1982–83 | 3,072 | n/a | 1,984 | 2,502 |
1983–84 | 3,097 | 1,397 | 1,734 | 3,320 |
1984–85 | 3,042 | 1,726 | 1,726 | 1,741 |
1985–86 | 2,567 | 1,308 | 1,308 | 2,039 |
1986–87 | 3,298 | 1,186 | 1,186 | 1,714 |
1987–88 | 3,567 | 962 | 966 | 2,055 |
1988–89 | 2,903 | 671 | 671 | 1,884 |
1989–90 | 2,431 | 521 | 521 | 1,851 |
HIP bids | Allocations | Allocations plus supplementary credit approvals | 2Gross capital expenditure | |
1990–91 | 2,337 | 825 | 825 | 2,529 |
1991–92 | 2,156 | 948 | 31,371 | n/a |
1992–93 | 2,781 | 1,115 | 31,115 | n/a |
South Lakeland | ||||
£ thousands (1991–92 prices) | ||||
HIP bids | Initial allocations | Final allocations | Gross capital expenditure2 | |
1979–90 | 5,447 | n/a | 4,202 | 3,206 |
1980–81 | 5,060 | n/a | 3,711 | 2,537 |
1981–82 | 5,168 | n/a | 3,988 | 3,403 |
1982/83 | 4,218 | n/a | 3,008 | 4,373 |
1983–84 | 4,257 | 3,384 | 4,000 | 4,661 |
1984–85 | 6,186 | 3,177 | 3,177 | 2,914 |
1985–86 | 6,265 | 2,409 | 2,431 | 4,889 |
1986–87 | 5,686 | 2,041 | 2,066 | 5,069 |
1987–88 | 4,977 | 1,770 | 1,790 | 5,878 |
1988–89 | 5,957 | 1,235 | 1,235 | 4,951 |
1989–90 | 6,661 | 868 | 868 | 6,986 |
HIP bids | Allocations | Allocations plus supplementary credit approvals | Gross capital expenditure2 | |
1990–91 | 6,303 | 1,234 | 1,234 | 3,983 |
1991–92 | 6,141 | 1,399 | 31,631 | n/a |
1992–93 | 5,834 | 1,590 | 31,590 | n/a |
1 A new capital finance system was introduced at the beginning of 1990–91 and the figures for allocations for 1990–91 and subsequent |
years are, therefore, not directly comparable with the figures for earlier years. Under the new system the HIP allocation is an assessment of relative need for housing capital expenditure rather than a direct borrowing approval. Borrowing approval is now conveyed by the single, cross-service, basic credit approval, which is set at a level which takes account of each authority's ability to finance expenditure from usable capital receipts.
2 Since 1981–82 local authorities have been able to augment the borrowing power of their HIP allocations by using the prescribed proportion of their capital receipts.
3 These figures reflect the latest position and are not yet final. n/a = Not available.