Skip to main content

Ssas

Volume 226: debated on Monday 7 June 1993

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what the additional educational needs distribution would have been in the 1993–94 SSAs for each authority if the new census data were incorporated.

The additional education need index for 1993–94 recalculated to include information from the 1991 census is shown in the table.

Distribution of additional education needs index using 1991 census information

Local authority

Additional education needs index

Greater London

City of London1·143100
Camden1·378000
Greenwich1·039200
Hackney1·735000
Hammersmith and Fulham1·411050
Islington1·466450
Kensington and Chelsea1·343450
Lambeth1·735300
Lewisham1·284200
Southwark1·501950
Tower Hamlets1·785800
Wandsworth1·185100
Westminster1·307150
Barking and Dagenham0·758000
Barnet0·814450
Bexley0·567200
Brent1·366950
Bromley0·485150
Croydon0·806850
Ealing1·161250
Enfield0·845050
Haringey1·484350
Harrow0·752500
Havering0·448150
Hillingdon0·641900
Hounslow0·894050
Kingston upon Thames0·545650
Merton0·785000
Newham1·514700
Redbridge0·824300
Richmond upon Thames0·526000
Sutton0·567550
Waltham Forest1·210500

Greater Manchester

Bolton0·748100
Bury0·518700
Manchester1·362050
Oldham0·774900
Rochdale0·801000
Salford0·883850
Stockport0·496200
Tameside0·638150
Trafford0·613950
Wigan0·554400

Merseyside

Knowsley1·257050
Liverpool1·227850
Sefton0·684750
St. Helens0·604100
Wirral0·839150

South Yorkshire

Barnsley0·620950
Doncaster0·708050
Rotherham0·625350
Sheffield0·783600

Tyne and Wear

Gateshead0·817300
Newcastle upon Tyne0·949900
North Tyneside0·648200
South Tyneside0·742850
Sunderland0·776850

West Midlands

Birmingham1·173150
Coventry0·848600
Dudley0·536450
Sandwell0·892550
Solihull0·541250

Local authority

Additional education needs index

Walsall0·712350
Wolverhampton0·967200

West Yorkshire

Bradford0·996100
Calderdale0·704400
Kirklees0·782750
Leeds0·704550
Wakefield0·551750

Shire counties

Avon0·561150
Bedfordshire0·635150
Berkshire0·522200
Buckinghamshire0·477750
Cambridgeshire0·488050
Cheshire0·514800
Cleveland0·817950
Cornwall0·473850
Cumbria0·493850
Derbyshire0·472300
Devon0·529250
Dorset0·492250
Durham0·595650
East Sussex0·597850
Essex0·484700
Gloucestershire0·449300
Hampshire0·487600
Hereford and Worcester0·410500
Hertfordshire0·461100
Humberside0·637200
Isle of Wight0·542150
Kent0·496400
Lancashire0·652500
Leicestershire0·619500
Lincolnshire0·484800
Norfolk0·476100
Northamptonshire0·505850
Northumberland0·491800
North Yorkshire0·383400
Nottinghamshire0·652550
Oxfordshire0·445150
Shropshire0·475350
Somerset0·409000
Staffordshire0·479300
Suffolk0·404600
Surrey0·390250
Warwickshire0·441550
West Sussex0·405550
Wiltshire0·437050
Isles of Scilly0·360000

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment for what reasons the visitor rights factor was doubled in the other services block distribution in the 1991–92 standard spending assessments.

The decision to double the weight on visitor nights was taken in the light of a large number of representations from local authorities suggesting that the weight of 0·25 of a resident, used in 1990–91, took insufficient account of the costs associated with tourism in such areas as environmental health and street cleaning.