Skip to main content

Child Support Agency

Volume 270: debated on Tuesday 30 January 1996

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many of the Child Support Agency cases deferred in December 1994 were taken on in (a) November 1995 and (b) December 1995; and what he estimates to be the month-by-month take-up until the end of the current financial year. [10182]

The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the chief executive, Miss Ann Chant. She will write to the hon. Member.

Letter from Miss Ann Chant to Ms Liz Lynne, dated 29 January 1996:

I am replying to your Parliamentary Question to the Secretary of State for Social Security about the take on of Child Support Agency cases deferred in December 1994.
The special take on of such cases in November and December 1995 was as follows:
  • November 1995—292
  • December 1995—178
As you are aware at the time of deferral some 340,000 cases were affected. The Secretary of State set the Agency a milestone target to commence the take on of these cases by the end of 1995. We formally started taking on the remaining cases in November last year, but in practice had already dealt with many of them because the parent with care had either specifically asked us to do so, or had made a repeat claim to a prescribed benefit, and had therefore been treated as a new claim.
I expect the rate of special take on of deferred cases to remain steady for the remainder of the financial year.
I hope this is helpful.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many incoming telephone calls were made to (a) the Child Support Agency centres and (b) the national inquiry line month by month since September 1994. [11195]

The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the chief executive, Miss Ann Chant. She will write to the hon. Member.

Letter from Miss Ann Chant to Ms Liz Lynne, dated 29 January 1996:

I am replying to your Parliamentary Question to the Secretary of State for Social Security about telephone calls made to the Child Support Agency.
The numbers of incoming calls made to Child Support Agency Centre Client Help Lines and the National Enquiry Line for the period requested are set out in the attached table.
I hope this is helpful.

Calls made to client help line and national enquiry line from September 1994

Month

Calls made to client help line (a)

Calls made to national enquiry line (b)

Totals

September 1994274,72275,952350,674
October 1994324,90565,786390,691
November 1994384,18162,205446,386
December 1994365,81345,393411,206
January 1995316,34569,377385,722
February 1995252,74346,010298,753
March 1995300,61067,148367,758
April 1995848,08976,028924,117
May 1995306,15253,001359,153
June 1995205,73252,229257,961
July 1995203,48256,697260,179
August 1995293,35155,603348,954
September 1995499,10459,639558,743
October 1995318,82455,941374,765
November 1995553,98658,861612,847
December 1995446,90940,327487,236
Totals5,894,948940,1976,835,145

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what changes were made on what dates to the arrangements for answering incoming calls at the Child Support Agency between September 1994 and September 1995; and when they were made. [11181]

The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the chief executive, Miss Ann Chant. She will write to the hon. Member.

Letter from Miss Ann Chant to Ms Liz Lynne, dated 29 January 1996:

I am replying to your Parliamentary Question to the Secretary of State for Social Security about changes made in the arrangements for answering incoming calls received in the Child Support Agency.
To improve customer services, management decided to centralise the National Enquiry Line and to create a section within each Child Support Agency Centre (CSAC) that would deal solely with incoming calls.
The National Enquiry Line based in Liverpool became fully operational on 21 June 1994 and the Central Call Handling sections with Automatic Call Distribution equipment within each CSAC were fully operational on the following dates:-
  • Belfast: 8 August 1994
  • Birkenhead: 8 August 1994
  • Dudley: 11 July 1994
  • Falkirk: 5 September 1994
  • Hastings: 1 August 1994
  • Plymouth: 22 August 1994
I hope this is helpful.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, pursuant to his answer of 18 December, Official Report, column 894, how the total figures for reduced benefit directives imposed by each Child Support Agency centre were arrived at. [11194]

The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the chief executive, Miss Ann Chant. She will write to the hon. Member.

Letter from Miss Ann Chant to Ms Liz Lynne, dated 29 January 1996:

Good cause accepted

Absent parent named

Good cause not accepted

Reduced benefit direction implemented

Investigations completed

Dudley

April33563580311978
May503986173061,218
June4502438203891,513
July4933545482651,395
August5763717495311,696
September5413705994641,510
October6193916823841,692
November5683865953861,549
Total4,0852,2765,1903,03611,551

Hastings

April321n/a522721843
May4601117907851,361
June4692227236311,414
July5442196794661,442
August4722076873611,366
September4952735825321,350
October5553007278361,582
November5403357165371,591
Total3,8561,6675,4264,86910,949

Falkirk

April36994471283934
May5341618333351,528
June6263459442421,915
July5893316452191,565
August6424089392761,989
September6334488623061,943
October5724287573941,757
November6374639183622,018
Total4,6022,6786,3692,41713,649

Birkenhead

April38996470510955
May5561856155111,356
June5922877134451,592
July6253617862781,772
August5823346374301,553
September6784286864551,792
October7225367754012,033
November8015679513822,319
Total4,9452,7945,6333,41213,372

Belfast

April4181375402601,095
May5991957404731,534
June4882716892501,448

I am reply to your Parliamentary Question to the Secretary of State for Social Security asking how the totals for reduced benefit directions (RBD) imposed by each Child Support Agency Centre were arrived at in Official Report, column 894 of 18th December 1995.

I do apologise that having looked again at the totals detailed for the RBD section of the tables provided in the above report, I can see that they were wrong. The sum shown at the bottom of these particular columns is not the the total of the individual figures in them.

I have enclosed an updated version of the full tables supplied by way of answer to your Parliamentary Question set out in Official Report, column 894. You will note that the relevant columns do now show their correct totals. I am very sorry I did not spot this error in my previous reply.

I hope this is helpful.

Good cause accepted

Absent parent named

Good cause not accepted

Reduced benefit direction implemented

Investigations completed

July5444276803931,651
August6314257443921,800
September6685268053361,999
October6245617363471,921
November6767807893002,245
Total3,3481,9814,1982,75113,693

Plymouth

April340100452276892
May4671126174581,196
June5082166843891,408
July4942946803921,468
August4382595753731,272
September5082674902741,265
October4502645674741,281
November6413645593411,564
Total2,7551,2483,4982,97710,346

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security (1) what consultations his Department has had with (a) the Australian and (b) New Zealand Governments on the operation of the Child Support Agency; [11801](2) what plans he has to commission research into the workings of the child support agencies of

(a) Australia, (b) New Zealand and (c) North America. [11805]

There have been a number of visits by officials from this Department to Australia and New Zealand to examine their schemes. There have also been discussions with officials from those countries at international conferences on child support and when officials from Australia and New Zealand have visited this country.Building on these contacts, officials regularly exchange information about their schemes, including the results of studies into the workings of the schemes in the different countries.