Skip to main content

County Courts

Volume 307: debated on Tuesday 24 February 1998

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department if he will list the average volume of work undertaken by county courts in each year since 1980. [30184]

The information for 1987 to 1997 is set out below. County courts vary considerably in size but the average figures have been calculated by taking the county court workload as a whole and dividing it by the number of county courts open in that year. Figures prior to 1987 will take a little longer to prepare. I will write to my hon. Friend as soon as they are available.

198719881989
Telford
Default and fixed date summons5,1384,8655,597
Warrants3,3063,4823,465
Company winding-up petitions000
Bankrupt petitions—creditors000
Bankrupt petitions—debtors000
High Court work000
Divorce petitions filed00753
Mortgage possession actions entered300227246
Trials heard302226
Arbitrations heard97123222

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department if he will undertake a feasibility study into extending the Shrewsbury Crown and Magistrate's courts to include provision for the County Court. [30182]

We have already looked at the possibility of housing the county court in these two buildings. It is very unlikely that the magistrates' court would have future capacity to accommodate the county court. The Crown Court is located in a building leased from Shropshire County Council. Discussions about the county court are continuing with the council, which has not yet been able to offer any suitable space.

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department if he will list the factors which are taken into account in consideration of the proposed closure of a county court by the Court Service. [30183]

The criteria, as set out in the Department Accommodation Plan, are:

  • The court's workload;
  • The condition of the existing accommodation and the availability of facilities;
  • The frequency of judicial visits and waiting times for hearings;
  • The capacity of alternative court(s) to cater for additional workload;
  • The facilities provided by the alternative court; and
  • The distances involved for court users travelling to an alternative court, and public transport consideration.
Ludlow
19871988198919901991199219931994199519961997
Default and fixed date summons696753858841881780641571538534570
Warrants389351384479570687417274312269273
Company winding-up petitions00000000000
Bankrupt petitions: creditors00000000000
Bankrupt petitions: debtors00000000000
High court work00000000000
Divorce petitions: filed00000000000
Mortgage possession actions entered3213336048464139282534
Trials heard41171111589192
Arbitrations heard30435835274394507783106
Owestry
19871988198919901991199219931994199519961997
Default and fixed date summons3,1532,5551,0731,1161,4211,7081,4931,1841,159873781
Warrants1,4511,2256897289101,031814662649363292
Company winding-up petitions00000000000
Bankrupt petitions: creditors00000000000
Bankrupt petitions: debtors00000000000
High court work00000000000
Divorce petitions filed00000000000
Mortgage possession actions entered3913156294876861786448
Trials heard222513101311933126
Arbitrations heard48594838547610355688184