Skip to main content

Disability Living Allowance

Volume 310: debated on Wednesday 22 April 1998

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many recipients of each of the various components of disability living allowance there are in the Seaham and Peterlee areas. [37897]

The administration of Disability Living Allowance is a matter for Mr. Peter Mathison, the Chief Executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to my hon. Friend.

Letter from Peter Mathison to Mr. John Cummings, dated 21 April 1998:

The Secretary of State for Social Security has asked me to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking how many recipients of each of the various components of Disability Living Allowance there are in the Seaham and Peterlee areas.
The information requested is provided in the following table. The figures have been obtained by analysing the claims of customers living within postcodes in the Seaham and Peterlee areas. Source: Analytical Services Division, 5% data. The figures are provisional and subject to change.

Recipients of disability living allowance in Seaham and Peterlee:

Components

Number

All awards11,000

Care Components:

Higher rate care1,700
Middle rate care2,300
Lower rate care2,900

Mobility Components:

Higher rate mobility8,500
Lower rate mobility1,500

I hope that this is helpful.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many reviews of disability living allowance awards were requested by recipients during each of the years 1995–96, 1996–97 and 1997–98; and what was the average time between the request and the review decision being made. [39217]

The information is set out in the table.

Reviews of disability living allowance decisions
Total review requestsAverage time from request to review decision (days)
1995–96344,10044
1996–97375,10749
1997–98354,73252

Notes:

  • 1. Figures relate to reviews initiated by the claimant.
  • 2. Some decisions relate to requests received in the previous year.
  • 3. Figures relate to decisions where a disallowed claim for benefit was allowed on review or where the amount or duration of a previous award has been increased.
  • Source:

    Analytical Services Division: 100 per cent. data.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many reviews of disability living allowance awards during each of the years 1995–96, 1996–97 and 1997–98 were requested (a) within three months of the original decision and (b) at any time broken down by reviews initiated by (i) the claimant and (ii) the Benefits Agency; and how many in each case were found in the claimant's favour. [39218]

    The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is set out in the tables.

    Reviews of disability living allowance decisions
    Review decisions1995–961996–971997–98
    Reviews requested within three months of the original decision
    Requests received172,914199,705201,632
    Decisions in the claimant's favour1,264,10067,11267,894
    Reviews requested after three months of the original decision
    Requests received171,186175,402153,100
    Decisions in the claimant's favour1,282,66676,64366,469
    1Some decisions relate to requests received in the previous year.
    2Figures relate to decisions where a disallowed claim for benefit was allowed on review or where the amount or duration of a previous award has been increased.

    Note:

    Figures relate to reviews initiated by the claimant.

    Source:

    Analytical Services Division: 100 per cent. data.

    Reviews of disability living allowance

    1995–96

    1996–97

    1997–98

    Total initiated by claimant138,000135,400122,600
    In claimant's favour1119,200116,500103,000
    Total initiated by Secretary of State4,0003,4008,800
    In claimant's favour13,0002,7008,100

    1Benefit awarded for the first time or amount and/or duration of award increased.

    Notes:

  • 1. Figures relate to 12 month period ending February.
  • 2. This table does not include new and repeat claims where benefit was originally disallowed; or cases where benefit was terminated on review.
  • Source:

    Analytical Services Division: 5 per cent. data.