Skip to main content

Road Schemes

Volume 324: debated on Wednesday 27 January 1999

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions if he will name the road schemes by each local authority which make up the existing commitments in the Local Transport Settlement 1999–2000; and if he will indicate for each (a) the money awarded in the 1999–2000 local transport settlement and (b) the total costs. [67021]

[holding answer 26 January 1999]: The table shows allocations made to grant supported major road schemes as part of the 1999–2000 local transport capital settlement. These schemes were accepted for funding between the 1986–87 and 1997–98 settlements. The Government are committed to providing sufficient funding for their completion, provided they continue to make reasonable progress, although we do not commit to fund the full costs of a major local road scheme. The table does not include committed expenditure on non-road schemes or resources which cannot be identified to a single road scheme, such as resources to meet applications during 1999–00 for grant under the Industrial Development Act 1982.

Authority

Scheme name

Allocation (£000)

Total gross cost (£000)

LincolnshireMarket Deeping Bypass41011,378
Newcastle upon TyneWest Central Route4,50021,709
Redcar and ClevelandSkelton and Brotton Bypass2,50013,500
CheshireChester Park and Ride Phase Two1,0007,858
CheshireWheelock Bypass2,20011,600
LancashireSouth Ribble M65 Interface Improvements2,80012,847
OldhamA62/A627 Oldham Way Improvements3006,981
TraffordTrafford Road Improvement28223,952
BuckinghamshireTingewick Bypass28213,274
East SussexNew Route (Dittons to Seaside) Eastbourne2,20029,370
KentBarracks Link Ashford2504,487
KentSouth Thames-Side Development Route Stage 44,00014,480
KentWainscott Northern Bypass24,25077,139
KentThanet Way Dualling (Sections 1–7A)8,000191,405
Medway TownsGillingham Northern Bypass2,58444,685
SurreyRunfold Diversion/Blackwater Valley Route A31-A3231,50050,059
DorsetA37 Improvements1209,029
GloucestershireGloucester South West Bypass2,65421,022
SomersetYeovil to Dorset Boundary Phase 11,4305,842
SomersetWells Relief Road70014,422
South GloucestershireAvon Ring Road II: B4465 Shortwood—A420 Warmley9,70029,961
DudleyDudley Southern Bypass9,00057,000
SolihullWest Midlands Renaissance Area30018,878
WolverhamptonWednesfield Bypass and Industrial Access1,40023,819
BarnsleyDearne Towns Link Road1,00040,422
LeedsLeeds City Centre Loop Phase 37006,989
LeedsLeeds Inner Ring Road Stages 6 and 73,80078,821
North East LincolnshireGrimsby, Peakes Parkway1,60025,991
HertfordshireCheshunt Link Road22016,552
PeterboroughWerrington to Glinton Phase 27481,752
BexleyErith-Thamesmead Spine Road (Phase IV)71234,499
GreenwichWoolwich Road Improvement2,11424,828
HarrowA409 Sheepcote Road Widening for two-way traffic5242,905
HarrowA409 Wealdstone By Pass29216,517
HillingdonUxbridge Town Centre3502,329
Kensington and ChelseaHarrow Road Junction with Ladbrooke Grove5169,171
Kingston upon ThamesNorth—South Strategy—A240 Corridor8004,730
KnowsleyM57—A562 Link Road1,00047,607
SeftonAintree, Park Lane Improvement2,0003,936
Total98,7381,037,489

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions how many local authorities have formally asked his Department for the routes of road schemes withdrawn in the National Roads Programme to be protected as advised in paragraph 96 of the draft guidance on Local Transport Plans. [67023]

[holding answer 26 January 1999]: To date no local authorities have formally indicated whether they intend to seek route protection for any of the schemes on routes to be detrunked which were withdrawn from the National Roads Programme as a result of the Roads Review. But, two authorities have proposed that route protection should be retained beyond the end of July pending the outcome of further studies.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions if he will list the number of major new road schemes for which each local authority bid for funding under the TPP system for 1999–2000. [67022]

[holding answer 26 January 1999]: We received eighty bids for new major local road schemes from English local highway authorities requesting capital funding in 1999–2000. The following authorities bid for one major scheme each: Lincolnshire, Northumberland, Stockton-on-Tees, Halton, Salford, West Yorkshire PTA, Buckinghamshire, Kent, Milton Keynes, Oxfordshire, West Sussex, Windsor and Maidenhead, Bath and North East Somerset, Bristol, Birmingham, Sandwell, Warwickshire, Barnsley, Kirklees, Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Essex, Hertfordshire, Bexley, Enfield, Greenwich and St. Helens. Authorities bidding for two or more schemes are shown in the table:

AuthorityNumber of new major road scheme bids
Leicestershire2
Nottinghamshire5
Surrey4
Cornwall4
Devon2
Gloucestershire2
Somerset2
Staffordshire3
Stoke-on-Trent2
West Midlands Joint authorities19
Worcestershire2
Doncaster3

Authority

Number of new major road scheme bids

Luton2
Norfolk7
Sutton2
Westminster2
Total80

1 the bid from the West Midlands Joint authorities was submitted on behalf of Birmingham, Centro, Coventry, Dudley, Sandwell, Solihull, Walsall and Wolverhampton authorities.

As announced in the local transport capital settlement for 1999–2000 on 17 December 1998, we accepted two of these schemes.