Skip to main content

Working Time Directive

Volume 327: debated on Thursday 18 March 1999

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions how many civil servants in his Department have been invited to waive the Working Time Directive requirement to work less than 48 hours a week on 17 consecutive weeks; how many civil servants in his Department have refused to waive the requirement; and what is the total cost of compliance with the Directive. [76809]

As the Secretaries of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, for Trade and Industry, and for Education and Employment share responsibility for the Government Offices in England, this answer also covers the Government Offices.The following numbers of staff in DETR(C) and its Agencies, and in the Government Offices, have signed an agreement to disapply the 48 hour limit:

Number of staff
DETR(C)37
Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency28
Driving Standards Agency0
Highways Agency10
Maritime and Coastguard Agency1
Planning Inspectorate1
Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre49
Vehicle Certification Agency0
Vehicle Inspectorate0
Government Office for the East of England0
Government Office for the East Midlands3
Government Office for London1
Government Office for the North East0
Government Office for the North West4
Government Office for the South East3
Government Office for the South West0
Government Office for the West Midlands3
Government Office for Yorkshire and the Humber7
1 Currently ten staff are discussing whether there are sound operational reasons to sign a waiver

The standard terms and conditions of service for staff are well within the limits set by the Working Time Regulations 1998. The Regulations do not require employers to keep records of the number of workers who refuse to sign an opt-out agreement and therefore no central records have been kept. Compliance costs are not kept centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.