Skip to main content

Civil Servants (Appraisal)

Volume 329: debated on Tuesday 13 April 1999

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what were the appraisal performance markings awarded to civil servants in 1998 for (a) each agency in his Department and (b) the Department broken down by (i) grade, (ii) gender, (iii) ethnicity, (iv) part-time/ full-time working and (v) disability; and for (1) each agency and (2) the Department whether the Cabinet Office's four fifths rule for detecting potential adverse impact was applied to the appraisal markings of civil servants in the 1998 report round. [78143]

HM Treasury's appraisal year runs from 1 February to 31 January. The performance markings awarded in 1998 therefore apply to the 1997–98 appraisal year.

(i) Breakdown by grade
Below Senior Civil service (SCS)
Box ABox BBox CBox DBox E
A31031120
B65176510
C42468223
D849107241
E124475290

SCS (To preserve anonymity, these markings cannot be provided by grade)

Box 1

Box 2+

Box 2

Box 3+

Box 3

Box 4

Box 5

6163016000

(ii) Gender)

Below SCS

Box A

Box B

Box C

Box D

Box E

Female1286162561
Male2192195823

SCS

Box 1

Box 2+

Box 2

Box 3+

Box 3

Box 4

Box 5

Female0363000
Male6132413000

(iii) Ethnicity

Below SCS

Box A

Box B

Box C

Box D

Box E

Ethnic minority02038320
White29143286924
Unknown41533140

SCS

The number of ethnic minority staff in the Senior Civil Service is too small to allow an anonymous breakdown of markings.

(iv) Part-time/full-time working

Below SCS

Box A

Box B

Box C

Box D

Box E

Part-time161980
Full-time321723381304

SCS

The number of part-time staff in the Senior Civil Service is too small to allow an anonymous breakdown of markings.

(v) Disability

Below SCS

Box A

Box B

Box C

Box D

Box E

Disabled141340
Not disabled321743441344

SCS

The number of disabled staff in the Senior Civil Service is too small to allow an anonymous breakdown of markings.

The Cabinet Office's four fifths rule was not applied to the 1997–98 appraisal markings. However, the Department's appraisal system will be reviewed in a wider equality audit in the Spring.