Skip to main content

Visitor Visas

Volume 330: debated on Monday 26 April 1999

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list, for each British post abroad which operates a pre-sift system for people applying for visit visas, how many people (a) were advised to withdraw their applications and (b) followed that advice, in (i) 1998 and (ii) 1999 to the latest convenient date.[81688]

During 1998, a total of 44,031 applicants withdrew their application at the Preliminary Assessment Stage. 52 posts operated a pre-sift system in 1998. They were as follows:

PostApplications withdrawn
Abuja1,862
Accra1,038
Abu Dhabi28
Addis Ababa1,179
Amman1,507
Amsterdam790
Ankara4
Bahrain7
Baku13
Bangkok66
Banjul545
Beirut3
Belgrade532
Bombay4,302
Calcutta20
Cairo1,422
Casablanca421
Colombo80
Copenhagen44
Damascus92
Dar es Salaam9
Dhaka1,158
Dubai3
Dublin177
Dusseldorf312
Geneva29

Post

Applications withdrawn

Hanoi12
Islamabad12,350
Istanbul123
Kiev3
Kingston780
Kinshasa41
Lagos2,060
Los Angeles925
Madras1,076
Madrid5
Manila126
Nairobi139
New Delhi5,549
Oslo133
Peking35
Paris1,917
Quito338
Rome236
Sana'a348
Sarajevo8
Stockholm47
Tashkent2
Tehran1,639
Tunis245
Washington111
Wellington140

The number of applicants who choose not to withdraw their application is not separately recorded.

Figures for 1999 will not be available until posts complete their 1999 Annual Statistical Return early in the year 2000. These figures are not collected monthly.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what factors underlie the decisions on which posts abroad operate a pre-sift system in dealing with applications for visit visas. [81689]

The decision to introduce a "sift" at any post can be taken only with the agreement of Migration and Visa Division. The factors taken into account will include overall numbers of applicants and the time each has to wait. Where a post experiences a large number of inadequately documented applications or visit visa applicants who have no connection with the UK or who are unclear about what they intend to do there, a "sift" may be introduced. The benefits of the "sift" procedure are that it prevents unnecessary work for the Entry Clearance Officer (ECO) and saves time, money and the disappointment of a refusal for the applicant. In addition, it shortens the waiting time for the well-prepared and well-supported applicant.Any decision not to proceed is the applicant's. If he/she wishes to pursue the application it will be accepted on payment of the appropriate fee.