Skip to main content

Education Funding

Volume 403: debated on Tuesday 8 April 2003

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills of the 36 LEAs which received increased budget announced on 25 March, which were in receipt of (a) the floor in their grant settlement, (b) the ceiling in their grant settlement and (c) the maximum amount possible of standards fund awards now consolidated into their budget; what was (i) the highest, (ii) the lowest and (iii) the average amount each LEA received in respect of standards fund moneys; in relation to an amount equivalent to consolidated standards fund money for each of the 36 LEAs, by how much does additional grant (A) fall below and (B) exceed that amount; and if he will make a statement. [107217]

[holding answer 4 April 2003]: It is not possible to answer the Question in precisely the way it has been asked. The table sets out the information requested in relation to (a) and (b). It also sets out (c) the reduction in Standards Fund grant between 2002–03 and 2003–04 as a result of the Government's commitment to reduce ringfenced funding for schools (d) the difference on a like-for-like basis between the total resources available for schools in 2002–03 and 2003–04 and (e) the level of additional grant announced on 25 March. The purpose of the additional funding is not to compensate authorities for the loss of individual Standards Fund grants but to to ensure that the effective increase in total education funding for LEAs and schools between 2002–03 and 2003–04 is no less than 3.2 per cent. per pupil for all authorities.

£ million
Grant settlementSF grant reductionTotal increaseExtra grant
Barking and Dagenham1.6555.0751.128
Bedfordshire2.5999.4520.135
BexleyFloor2.0372.7411.492
BournemouthFloor0.5942.0390.140
Brighton and HoveFloor1.3682.8220.960
BromleyFloor2.4566.1390.815
Camden1.9971.5761.168
CroydonFloor2.9186.2261.302
DorsetFloor1.4528.9320.318
East SussexFloor2.88711.3690.110
Enfield2.5276.0731.147
EssexFloor7.72338.5001.162
Hammersmith and FulhamFloor1.7231.5890.886
HampshireFloor6.66828.6680.278
HaringeyFloor3.2852.6481.330
HaveringFloor1.7993.2821.089
Hertfordshire5.93223.2611.000
Isle of Wight Council0.8822.5310.110
Kensington and ChelseaFloor1.0062.3640.288
Knowsley2.8170.5680.736
Lambeth2.6097.2271.282
Leicestershire2.32514.6440.835
Medway1.8673.6081.295
Norfolk5.06415.7401.595
North East Lincolnshire1.1532.7380.033
PlymouthFloor1.3502.6650.831
PortsmouthFloor1.4201.4460.891
Redbridge2.2955.5840.903
Richmond upon ThamesFloor0.9963.6590.152
SloughCeiling0.8453.4170.376
SouthamptonFloor1.4891.6871.016
SouthendFloor1.1153.7650.358
Suffolk4.00616.4910.108
Sutton1.4605.0110.503
ThurrockCeiling1.1783.5970.308
Waltham ForestFloor2.8032.9842.140

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what plans he has to assist schools where the local education authority has passported to schools the amount expected by his Department, but the net effect of changes in the standards fund has resulted in increases to the school of less than 3.2 per cent. per pupil. [107218]

[holding answer 4 April 2003]: I would refer my hon. Friend to my written statement of 26 March 2003, Official Report, column 14WS.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what change there has been in schools funding in Essex since 1997. [107709]

Funding per pupil in Essex, including both standard spending assessments and revenue grants has increased in real terms from an average £2,790 in 1997–98 to £3,380 in 2002–03, an increase of £590 or 21 per cent. Complete figures for 2003–04 including grants are not yet available.