Skip to main content

Prisons

Volume 407: debated on Tuesday 24 June 2003

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list for each category D prison for which the Prison Service has responsibility for each of the last five years, (a) how many prisoners have absconded (b) how many prisoners who absconded were caught and returned to prisons, (c) how many prisoners at (b) served all or part of the remainder of their sentence in a category C or above prison, (d) how many prisoners have absconded who have yet to be recaptured and (e) how much annual investment has been made in each of the category D prisons designed to deter absconding; and if he will make a statement.[120516]

Categorisation relates to prisoners not prisons. Category D prisoners are those who it is assessed can be reasonably trusted in open conditions. The information sought is not collated in the form requested and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. The available information is set out in the following table. Data are given in respect of prisons that are now open or semi-open. Drake Hall was a female open prison until January 2002 when it became a semi-open prison. Hatfield open young offender institution became Moorland open prison in 2002. Morton Hall was re-roled from male open to female semi-open in 2000. Data on the number recaptured may be understated due to under-reporting.No investment has been made in open prisons specifically aimed at deterring absconding, but prisoners allocated to open conditions are selected on the basis of stringent risk assessment procedures. The nature of the regimes in the open estate, with their focus on effective resettlement in the community after release, are designed to encourage the development of personal responsibility on the part of prisoners. Those prisoners who do abscond are usually located in closed, category C, prisons following recapture. In addition to the more

Prison absconders
Number of prisoners absconding
Prison1998–991999–20002000–012001–022002–03In total over the five yearsNumber reported as recaptured by 17 June 2003Number not reported as recaptured by 17 June 2003
Askham Grange2120212012945638
Blantyre House00001110
Drake Hall122933832028526718
East Sutton Park323201082
Ford386857549130825751
Hatfield/Moorland683635505624422816
Hewell Grange16322015231067630
Hollesley Bay24112481481801
Kirkham19617316916420991185259
Kirklevington Grange0000110
Latchmere House00121413
Leyhill24342517331339637
Morton Hall162360045441
North Sea Camp27292436341501316
Usk/Prescoed1319145859518
Grendon/Spring Hill914141223725319
Standford Hill43529378118413252
Sudbury646269796834231725
Thorn Cross12314710813715266761948
Wealstun67721167910343738057

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many prison cells there are; and of these how many are regarded as safe cells. [120724]

The number of available prison cells changes daily as a result of construction and change in use. At present, the number of cells in use is approximately 45,000. Almost 3,000 safer cells have been installed.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what measures he has taken to expand the capacity of existing prisons to meet the forecast average population of the prison estate for 2004. [119569]

Funding from the May 2002 budget was provided for 2,320 places to be delivered over the following 12 months.In addition, we have already announced that £60 million will be made available to provide 740 places by March 2004, together with funding for 450 places at Birmingham prison, which are currently scheduled to open by April 2004. A further £138 million has been agreed from the Budget, which will be used to build around 1,000 places over the period 2004–06.Provisions in the Criminal Justice Bill will provide sentencers with a range of new disposals to enable them to impose tough and flexible sentences on offenders who do not need to be given custodial sentences. We are also introducing tough new community sentences such as the 'Intensive Control and Change programme' (ICCP) aimed at cutting offending by 18 to 20-year-olds by tackling their offending behaviour and aiding rehabilitation. We have also extended the Home Detention Curfew scheme to increase the maximum period to four and a half months. limited regime and greater restrictions which apply in such prisons, prisoners who abscond are likely to receive a punishment involving added days and the loss of various privileges. Where eligible, such prisoners would also be extremely unlikely to secure early release on home detention curfew licence.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many unfilled positions there were in the Prison Service in each month since June 2002; by what percentage the Prison Service is understaffed in each prison in the UK; and what measures his Department is taking to increase the number of prison officers into the Prison Service.[120170]

The number of unfilled prison officer grade positions in the Prison Service for each month since June 2002 is shown in Table A. The percentage shortfall in each prison in England and Wales within the public sector is contained in Table B. It has not been possible to collate this information for contracted out prisons and I shall write to the hon. Member when the information is available.There are a number of measures under way to increase recruitment and retention. The National Staffing Unit successfully increased prison officer recruitment from an average 1,000 a year to 2,096 during 2002–03. In line with all other recruitment, responsibility for officer recruitment has now been devolved to area and establishment level in order that areas of specific need can be addressed more effectively by local advertising and recruitment campaigns. The majority of applicants wish to work in their home area and are not prepared to move to where establishments have vacancies. Recruitment campaigns have been and continue to be run in areas where shortages are identified and provision has been made to train a further 2,200 new officers during the current financial year.Shortfalls have occurred at a number of establishments where additional accommodation has been built and recruitment has increased the pressure on training course places. Many establishments which are currently understaffed have recruited staff and are awaiting their availability to start training.In addition, local allowances have been introduced to assist in the retention of staff in areas of high turnover.

Table A
Staff in postPlanned postsShortfallPercentage under staffed
June 200222,897.523,785.1887.63.88
July 200222,91523,785.1870.13.80
August 200222,92423,785.1861.13.76
September 200223,015.524,073.11,057.64.60
October 200223,109.524,073.1963.64.17
November 200223,088.524,073.1984.64.26
December 200223,090.524,214.61,124.14.87
January 200323,223.524,214.6991.14.27
February 200323,246.524,214.6968.14.16
March 200323,320.524,310.85990.354.25
April 200323,356.524,310.85954.354.09
May 200323,383.524,310.85927.353.97
Table B
Staff in postPlanned postsPercentage under staffed
Highpoint North8711222.32
Highdown243.529517.46
Lancaster Farms202.524316.67
Erlestoke102121.516.05
Bullingdon212.525316.01
Bullwood Hall76.59015.00
Downview9811514.78
Exeter173.520113.68
Bristol26630813.64
Askham Grange29.53413.24
Send657412.16
Wormwood Scrubs27831612.03
Haslar465211.54
Hindley250.528211.17
Dorchester809011.11
Feltham417.546810.79
Whitemoor47552910.21
Belmarsh490543.59.84
Lancaster80.5899.55
Gloucester119.51329.47
Holloway2612889.38
Portland156.5172.59.28
Long Lartin3613979.07
Warren Hill137150.58.97
Grendon1541698.88
Leyhill6773.58.84
Drake Hall8188.58.47
Brixton2212418.30
Rochester136147.57.80
North Sea Camp38.541.757.78
Eastwood Park116.51267.54
Garth215232.57.53
Lincoln2112287.46
Bedford139.51507.00
Hewell Grange29.531.66.65
Huntercombe1591706.47
The Mount1501606.25
Ford61656.15
Littlehey1441535.88
CookhamWood56.5605.83
Thorn Cross105111.55.83
Acklington218.52325.82
Onley223.52375.70
Stafford164.51745.46
Frankland471.5498.55.42
Werrington79.5845.36
Albany1421505.33
Woodhill4344575.03
Camp Hill143.51514.97
Wellingborough1351424.93
Morton Hall107.51134.87
Preston234.52464.67
Wakefield3583754.53
Table B
Staff in postPlanned postsPercentage under staffed
Northallerton65684.41
Gartree144.51514.30
Deerbolt1761833.83
Liverpool495.55153.79
Durham408.54243.66
New Hall1861933.63
Dover1091133.54
Lindholme1921993.52
Blundeston152.51583.48
Parkhurst1901963.06
Guys Marsh143.51483.04
Brockhill991022.94
Low Newton1391432.80
Blantyre House35362.78
Brinsford229235.52.76
Wayland1521562.56
Wymott2082132.35
Stocken147.51512.32
Aylesbury170.5174.52.29
Kirklevington44452.22
Pentonville384392.52.17
Nottingham1811852.16
Wetherby161.51652.12
Lewes173.51771.98
Castington2102141.87
Weare109.5111.51.79
Ranby2252291.75
Wandsworth367373.51.74
Cardiff2352391.6
Glen Parva2502541.57
Chelmsford191.51941.29
Wealstun1541561.28
Hollesley Bay41.5421.19
Usk/Prescoed87881.14
Standford Hill89901.11
Full Sutton478.5483.51.03
Maidstone1921941.03
Hull339.53431.02
Stoke Heath2322340.85
Haverigg127.5128.50.78
Sudbury66.5670.75
Featherstone1421430.70
Holme House307308.50.49
Buckley Hall109.51100.45
Channings Wood161.51620.31
Winchester219198.50.00
Whatton93920.00
The Verne108105.50.00
Swinfen Hall1191190.00
Swansea1281280.00
Swaleside243.52380.00
Styal1711690.00
Shrewsbury104.51020.00
Shepton Mallet65650.00
Risley306.53010.00
Reading115.5114.50.00
Norwich2302290.00
Moorland335.53310.00
Manchester4214160.00
Leicester1311220.00
Leeds417.5414.50.00
Latchmere House39390.00
Kirkham87850.00
Kingston77730.00
Highpoint South1991680.00
Foston Hall8783.50.00
Everthorpe1211210.00
Elmley2552420.00
East Sutton Park24.522.50.00
Dartmoor178.51750.00
Coldingley99980.00
Canterbury116.51100.00
Blakenhurst1771660.00
Birmingham3813190.00
Ashwell114.5111.50.00

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what assessment he has made of the adequacy of arrangements to prevent prisoners receiving medication attempting to take an overdose; [119797](2) what guidance is given to prisons about the staffing of prison hospital wings by non hospital wing staff; [119799](3) what assessment he has made of the adequacy of medical training given to prison hospital staff. [119800]

[holding answer 17 June 2003]: We intend to publish the report of a review of pharmacy services for prisoners very shortly. The national occupational standards for custodial health care set out the competencies required for the administration of medication, including in circumstances where there is a risk of self-harm.The "Toolkit for Health Care Needs Assessment in Prisons" (University of Birmingham February 2000) provided guidance for prisons and the NHS on the planning requirements for health care services for prisoners. The organisation and staffing of health care centres are matters to be determined by prison governors, in consultation with their local NHS partners. The level and mix of staff at different times of the day are decided locally, subject to the same considerations as for other areas of the prison.Within the context of the prison health reforms, specific studies were carried out on the training and other developmental needs of prison doctors, nurses and

1999–20002000–012001–022002–03
Working days lostCasesWorking days lostCasesWorking days lostCasesWorking days lostCases
Acklington9012331974311054413
Albany3999116412851194
Ashwell98572514422867
Askham Grange2098269426634484
Aylesbury769381,314348391887319
Bedford5282661430717201,03718
Belmarsh1,448342,344563,1611053,18079
Birmingham1,338302,426531,105341,08629
Blakenhurst291111,19425
Blantyre House129127100111
Blundeston51618604175251245316
Brinsford64921539205161269416
Bristol1,612452,025418452597325
Brixton1,064273,051562,251481,63540
Brockhill51311625126951583923
Buckley Hall8166165381146911
Bullingdon649241,41441700371,44670
Bullwood Hall33482491022010464
Camp Hill439129674441159
Canterbury68220689203571568613
Cardiff763211,076261,3283181922
Castington1,956281,743302,192361,60819
Channings Wood4645466641042912
Chelmsford1,35628434186931351413
Coldingley15352692394132249
Cookham Wood1082603121097
Dartmoor68418879311,073171,91936
Deerbolt4651245310280661718
Dorchester7085360513532132
Dover3178477947173124
Downview5761438611414845211
Drake Hall297113216504152828
Durham1,132271,011342,056362,01045
East Sutton Park152001911014
Eastwood Park35512264151,0882082817
Elmley62016750236392777741

health care officers. The recommendations in these reports, which are available at: www.doh.gov.uk/prisonhealth/ publications, have been accepted and are in the process of being implemented.

A report into the circumstances surrounding the act of self-harm by a prisoner on 9 June 2003 at Woodhill prison was received by the Prison Service on 13 June. This was forwarded to Ministers on 17 June 2003, along with the Prison Service's response. I made a written ministerial statement on 19 June 2003, Official Report, column 13WS about the findings of the inquiry.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) sick days were taken and (b) prison officers were on sick leave owing to mental health problems in each prison in each year since 1997. [120104]

Sickness absence is recorded in terms of the reason for absence. The following table provides the number of working days lost and cases recorded among officer grade staff for psychological conditions in each year since April 1999. Reliable sickness absence information is not available prior to 1999.Data relates to prison officer, senior officer and principal officer grades. Over the period, the number of officers in post has risen from 23,875 at 31 March 1999 to 24,825 at 31 March 2003. Information on contracted out prisons is not available as it is commercial in confidence.

1999–2000

2000–01

2001–02

2002–03

Working days lost

Cases

Working days lost

Cases

Working days lost

Cases

Working days lost

Cases

Erlestoke27572891237465338
Everthorpe27338361121325
Exeter6772064615999241,02730
Featherstone2631416251375757
Feltham1,623391,804382,129441,13160
Ford115033231826
Foston Hall206534110306122799
Frankland47115904251,185281,01121
Full Sutton1,256401,198382,304492,02836
Garth813191,430218221298916
Gartree799166998761845710
Glen Parva692201,30122462151,53530
Gloucester5597664128561598223
Grendon3216784211,198191,43830
Guys Marsh39973308461101,07015
Haslar117965229932944
Haverigg5138409127932757113
Hewell Grange002113521242
Highdown894221,152301,234291,40925
Highpoint402187221621873219
Highpoint North352940612
Hindley71738012417151,53426
Hollesley Bay818954013701163915
Holloway1,746422,386482,060512,43957
Holme House9041995422789241,51030
Hull19410567195781395022
Huntercombe45381,033231,1893056932
Kingston144983712542186
Kirkham1559189810821543
Kirklevington642001363612
Lancaster2522291422954609
Lancaster Farms85120978125461541513
Latchmere House00111895507
Leeds1,339571,110381,913431,90445
Leicester1311060314657111,06416
Lewes9272285420798211,09929
Leyhill2693166646392215
Lincoln31164131026382,16650
Lindholme420660417664151,20223
Littlehey494191,086141,4662176715
Liverpool826202,689562,550422,50746
Long Lartin811231,241235531736518
Low Newton7131358288924310
Maidstone7291779018927251,69026
Manchester2,529442,509493,019633,59152
Moorland4091482129998161,17327
Morton Hall203481136939913
New Hall334119364511288220
North Sea Camp1119052231214415
Northallerton28481725824543
Norwich486963119593191,17129
Nottingham96823420103561672421
Onley63421896291,544321,94635
Parkhurst58512565141,568261,22519
Pentonville1,115381,012401,799561,74437
Portland731281,183291,281215287
Preston1,095251,217221,044181,05724
Ranby34175563491478121
Reading1272874187781457117
Risley1,714201,032201,692283,93855
Rochester469841718793132,09128
Send46622216828441278
Shepton Mallet158523062461484
Shrewsbury2808348596787198
Stafford1,18625805311,654281,20725
Standford Hill6961113773013818
Stocken2697251934153057
Stoke Heath9991467912664261,33223
Styal9431863015699954018
Sudbury8262663314102219
Swaleside23913786181,592221,18421

1999–2000

2000–01

2001–02

2002–03

Working days lost

Cases

Working days lost

Cases

Working days lost

Cases

Working days lost

Cases

Swansea11045441466695476
Swinfen Hall75411111562747
The Mount2991053416174831115
The Verne64466516910494
Thorn Cross1625217104971468915
Usk/Prescoed11519368550010
Wakefield928211,002251,950402,02343
Wandsworth53818982331,716262,43451
Warren Hill5799
Wayland1665109819253498
Wealstun57910309820181807
Weare74421630243381235610
Wellingborough42712569164901181424
Werrington446959011191102347
Wetherby3419477211,1491774911
Whatton12956632121384
Whitemoor1,037332,385393,044561,77646
Winchester2,010401,307291,299451,29641
Woodhill1,100341,502382,868583,44170
Wormwood Scrubs3,579692,412542,354742,52553
Wymott3948639181,0302774720
HQ50165399977107138
Total74,6371,89487,1172,188101,6292,360114,2282,583

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many instances of (a) suicide, (b) self-harm and (c) violence against staff or inmates have occurred at HMP Styal in each month since January. [120166]

The following tables give the information requested.

Month (2003)Number of self- inflicted deathsNumber of instances of self-harm
January125
February042
March039
April130
May0Not available
June11Not available
Total3136
1 up to 17 June 2003
Month (2003)Number of assaults against staffNumber of assaults against prisoners
January41
February30
March50
April44
May40
June1Not availableNot available
Total205
1 up to 17 June 2003
Emerging findings from a group examining recent deaths in custody at Styal have helped to bring about a number of immediate changes. These include the maximisation of prisoners' access to work, education and time out of cell, as well as to various peer support schemes and mental health professionals; improvements to Styal's induction programme; and an improved package of training and support for staff in first-aid and management of suicidal women.

In the longer term, 200,000 of funding has been secured to dedicate part of Styal's Waite wing to a proposed high-risk activity team, which will include staff specially trained in risk identification and management. NHS funding has been secured to provide a methadone maintenance programme for women dependent on opiates (subject to staff recruitment), a particular necessity in the female estate where a high percentage of receptions are poly-drug users.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what action he is taking to (a) reduce overcrowding in prisons, (b) reduce the number of security incidents in prisons reported to the Home Office each week and (c) improve the vetting procedures for employing prison officers into the Prison Service.[120167]

Funding has been provided for 2,820 extra prison places to be built at existing prisons. In addition, two new prisons will be opened at Ashford and Peterborough. Together with building programmes in progress, these will increase the total useable capacity of the Prison Service estate from 74,138 (as at 19 June 2003) to around 78,700 by 2006.Provisions in the Criminal Justice Bill will provide sentencers with a range of new disposals to enable them to impose tough and flexible sentences on offenders who do not need to be given custodial sentences. We are also introducing tough new community sentences such as the 'Intensive Control and Change programme' aimed at cutting offending by 18 to 20-year-olds by tackling their offending behaviour and aiding rehabilitation. We have also extended the Home Detention Curfew scheme to increase the maximum period to four and a half months. Whatever the population pressures, the Government are uncompromising in its response to serious and dangerous offenders: where there is a need to protect the public, they will be held in a secure environment.

Prisons are required to report security incidents to Prison Service headquarters. The number of reported incidents in prisons has increased over recent years. In part this is due to improved reporting, although both the number and rate of incidents has increased. Incident data is monitored and analysed so that policy and procedures can be reviewed in order to minimise future incidents and disseminate best practice. Key performance indicators on escapes, assaults and drug testing focus managers and staff on preventing these types of security incidents and self inflicted deaths.

Major initiatives aimed at minimising security incidents include a review of the security manual, a programme of perimeter security improvements in selected prisons and a security awareness programme. Improved analysis and research into the pattern and causes of incidents, including those of concerted indiscipline and hostage taking, is under way.

The Safer Custody Group is working on a violence reduction strategy that will focus on prevention. This mirrors similar approaches taken in the community and in other organisations. Work is already under way to increase the problem-solving capacity of staff and prisoners, improve risk management, reduce violent offending and prevent victimisation.

The Prison Service Drug Strategy includes a co-ordinated package of measures to reduce both the supply of—and demand for—drugs in prison. These include improving CCTV in visits areas, providing additional drug detection dogs, introducing comprehensive measures to deal with visitors who attempt to smuggle drugs, research into the most effective electronic drug-detection equipment, better use of fixed and low-level furniture, and improving drugs awareness training for staff. In February 2003, the Prison Service announced the Supply Reduction Project (SRP)—a co-ordinated programme that aims to support establishments reduce still further the supply of drugs in prisons.

In addition to these centrally led initiatives, establishments have developed local programmes tailored to their particular circumstances. These include violence reduction and anti-bullying programmes. Minimising the number of security incidents is essential to the safe custody of prisoners and to the protection of prisoners and staff. However, the number of incidents will increase as population increases and it should be recognised that the majority of incidents other than escapes, assaults and deaths are quickly and safely resolved by Prison Service staff through the use of good contingency planning and incident resolution procedures.

A formal investigation into the circumstances of the employment of a journalist at Woodhill is scheduled to report by 27 June 2003. The terms of reference include a requirement to ascertain what took place and recommend changes to recruitment and pre-appointment vetting procedures. It would not be appropriate to pre-empt the findings of the report. The Prison Service will consider urgently what action to take in the light of the recommendations.