Skip to main content

Advantage West Midlands

Volume 408: debated on Thursday 10 July 2003

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much Objective Two and Three European funding Advantage West Midlands has (a) applied for and (b) received in each financial year since its inception; and how much was spent on projects in North Staffordshire in each year. [12261]

(a) AWM inherited a number of ERDF funded projects at its inception from previous organisations. These totalled £12.5 million.

Since its inception, AWM has applied for objective 2 funding totalling £15.4 million. These projects are mainly regionwide projects, benefiting the whole of the West Midlands region.

(b) AWM have received the following amounts of ERDF in each financial year.

£ million

1999–20000.832
2000–012.057
2001–024.070
2002–030.548

None of this has been spent on projects in North Staffordshire specifically, although a number of the ERDF funded projects benefit the West Midlands region.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what the grant-in-aid spending by Advantage West Midlands was in each financial year since its inception; how much was spent on projects in North Staffordshire in each year; how much was spent under the (a) land and property regeneration, (b) skills development and rapid response, (c) rural regeneration, (d) regional innovation fund, (e) inward investment and (f) applied to purchase operations and assets headings in each year; and how much of each was spent in (i) Stoke-on-Trent, (ii) Newcastle-under-Lyme, (iii) Staffordshire Moorlands and (iv) Stafford. [122618]

The tables highlight spend in the various categories and four geographical areas stated in the PQ.The first table gives a breakdown of expenditure in the four areas, Stoke-on-Trent, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire Moorlands and Stafford against five of the stated categories [Land and Property, Skills/RRF, Rural, Regional Innovation Fund and Inward Investment].The second table highlights the funds to "applied to purchase operations and asset headings" [i.e. capital and revenue expenditure] in the four areas. This table includes other expenditure such as SRB and RS A but excludes Regeneration Zone expenditure that cannot be clearly allocated to one of the four areas.

£ millon
Spend:1999–20002000–012001–022002–03
(a) Stoke-on-Trent
(a) L&P1.2530.9062.9952.494
(b) Skills/RRF0.4500.250
(c) Rural
(d) Regional Innovation Fund0.6900.9250.002
(e) Inward Investment
(b) Newcastle-under-Lyme
(a) L&P(0.108)(0.279)2.0860.124
(b) Skills/RRF0.203
(c) Rural
(d) Regional Innovation Fund
(e) Inward Investment
(c) Staffordshire Moorlands
(a) L&P0.0040.7031.291
(b) Skills/RRF
(c) Rural0.0630.078
(d) Regional Innovation Fund
(e) Inward Investment
(d) Stafford
(a) L&P0.0960.009
(b) Skills/RRF
(c) Rural0.014
(d) Regional Innovation Fund
(e) Inward Investment

(f) Purchase Operations & Asset Headings

£ million

Capital

Revenue

Total

(a) Stoke-on-Trent

1999–20007.6253.57311.198
2000–016.8232.7819.604
2001–028.2075.90214.109
2002–038.4574.84113.298
Total31.11217.09748.209

(b) Newcastle-under-Lyme

1999–20011.151.012.16
2000–021.0731.0732.146
2001–031.0671.0682.135
2002–040.6930.6931.386
Total3.9833.8447.827

(c) Staffordshire Moorlands

1999–20020.1450.0660.211
2000–030.0780.30.378
2001–041.1420.4311.573
2002–051.9370.4722.409
Total3.3021.2694.571

(d) Stafford

1999–20030.09600.096
2000–0400.0130.013
2001–050.0690.3550.424
2002–060.4260.5771.003
Total0.5910.9451.536