Skip to main content

Homes (Repossession)

Volume 447: debated on Monday 19 June 2006

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs how many court orders have been issued for the repossession of homes in each London borough in each of the past five years; and if she will make a statement. (75696)

The following table shows the number of mortgage possession orders made in all London county courts in the last five years.

These figures do not indicate how many houses have been repossessed through the courts, since not all the orders will have resulted in the issue and execution of warrants of possession.

The civil procedure rules state that all claims for the repossession of land must be commenced in the district in which the land is situated. However, county courts’ jurisdictions are not coterminous with London borough boundaries, and therefore any single court’s repossession actions are likely to relate to homes in a number of different boroughs.

Number of mortgage1 possession orders made in county courts2 in London, 2001-05

Possession orders made3

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Barnet

66

100

97

143

302

Bow

176

248

295

456

817

Brentford

110

113

124

189

290

Bromley

103

161

235

271

486

Central London

43

88

101

162

281

Clerkenwell

31

35

59

78

132

Croydon

257

254

338

394

644

Edmonton

176

206

228

285

553

Ilford

105

115

93

219

309

Kingston-upon-Thames

58

58

91

94

165

Lambeth

117

160

195

311

533

Mayors and City

1

1

0

2

0

Romford

111

118

179

211

445

Shoreditch

48

80

113

155

225

Uxbridge

108

100

98

149

227

Wandsworth

96

100

135

187

295

West London

40

40

64

79

150

Willesden

155

147

236

255

459

Woolwich

53

96

96

181

348

Greater London total

1,854

2,220

2,777

3,821

6,661

1 Local authority and private 2 Does not include the small number of possession actions entered in the High Court. 3 The court, following a judicial hearing, may grant an order for possession immediately. This entitles the claimant to apply for a warrant to have the defendant evicted. However, even where a warrant for possession is issued, the parties can still negotiate a compromise to prevent eviction.