Skip to main content

Brownfield Development

Volume 448: debated on Thursday 6 July 2006

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer of 20 June 2006, Official Report, column 1744, on brownfield development, if she will break down the south east region figures for 2004 by local authority area. (80713)

[holding answer 27 June 2006]: The information available is from Land Use Change Statistics, shown in the following tables. The tables show figures for 2004 and the average for 2001 to 2004 for each local authority in the south east. Single year figures at local authority level are not representative due to small sample sizes and are therefore subject to fluctuation, so the average over the period 2001 to 2004 is a better representation than the figure for a single year.

The figures provided in the previous answer included conversions, which are only available at a regional level. The figures in this answer therefore exclude conversions, and as a result the regional total shown will be different.

The tables also include figures for 1989 to 1992. Before 1989 the data was based on smaller samples and so is not comparable.

New dwellings on previously-developed land: South East

2004

New dwellings on previously-developed land, excluding conversions, as a proportion of all new dwellings

New dwellings on NOT previously-developed land, as a proportion of all new dwellings (greenfield)

New dwellings on previously residential land as a proportion of all on previously developed land

New dwellings on previously residential land as a proportion of all new dwellings

Bracknell Forest

98

2

18

18

West Berkshire

64

36

11

7

Reading

100

0

45

45

Slough

60

40

32

19

Windsor and Maidenhead

97

3

37

36

Wokingham

41

59

72

29

Aylesbury Vale

50

50

74

37

South Bucks

100

0

100

100

Chiltern

99

1

41

41

Wycombe

93

7

66

61

Milton Keynes

12

88

12

1

Eastbourne

40

60

41

16

Hastings

28

72

8

2

Lewes

71

29

34

24

Rother

86

14

45

39

Wealden

81

19

55

44

Brighton and Hove

100

0

24

24

Basingstoke and Deane

33

67

72

24

East Hampshire

80

20

55

44

Eastleigh

87

13

43

37

Fareham

95

5

62

59

Gosport

60

40

18

11

Hart

39

61

52

20

Havant

98

2

23

22

New Forest

87

13

73

63

Rushmoor

92

8

25

23

Test Valley

83

17

18

15

Winchester

74

26

58

43

Portsmouth

91

9

13

11

Southampton

99

1

25

25

Isle of Wight

79

21

47

37

Ashford

28

72

26

7

Canterbury

39

61

19

8

Dartford

73

27

6

4

Dover

83

17

7

6

Gravesham

92

8

5

5

Maidstone

80

20

22

17

Sevenoaks

88

12

44

39

Shepway

79

21

13

10

Swale

46

54

31

14

Thanet

91

9

33

30

Tonbridge and Malling

81

19

18

14

Tunbridge Wells

90

10

52

47

Medway

91

9

22

20

Cherwell

42

58

48

20

Oxford

50

50

11

6

South Oxfordshire

94

6

72

68

Vale of White Horse

78

22

12

9

West Oxfordshire

21

79

30

6

Elmbridge

98

2

73

71

Epsom and Ewell

100

0

10

10

Guildford

100

0

26

26

Mole Valley

75

25

35

26

Reigate and Banstead

99

1

19

19

Runnymede

87

13

53

46

Spelthorne

100

0

29

29

Surrey Heath

99

1

90

89

Tandridge

97

3

70

68

Waverley

100

0

47

47

Woking

100

0

18

18

Adur

99

1

1

1

Arun

86

14

17

14

Chichester

82

18

54

44

Crawley

100

0

Horsham

99

1

27

27

Mid Sussex

53

47

25

13

Worthing

63

37

30

19

Total south east

72

28

36

26

Average 2001 to 2004

New dwellings on previously-developed land, excluding conversions, as a proportion of all new dwellings

New dwellings on NOT previously-developed land, as a proportion of all new dwellings (greenfield)

New dwellings on previously residential land as a proportion of all on previously developed land

New dwellings on previously residential land as a proportion of all new dwellings

Bracknell Forest

69

31

56

39

West Berkshire

69

31

14

10

Reading

97

3

20

19

Slough

76

24

20

15

Windsor and Maidenhead

87

13

62

54

Wokingham

71

29

66

47

Aylesbury Vale

45

55

42

19

South Bucks

86

14

53

45

Chiltern

94

6

51

48

Wycombe

94

6

28

26

Milton Keynes

13

87

15

2

Eastbourne

30

70

32

10

Hastings

45

55

13

6

Lewes

57

43

25

14

Rother

75

25

46

35

Wealden

83

17

67

55

Brighton and Hove

93

7

25

23

Basingstoke and Deane

40

60

86

34

East Hampshire

70

30

45

32

Eastleigh

81

19

39

31

Fareham

77

23

65

50

Gosport

41

59

14

6

Hart

36

64

53

19

Havant

79

21

42

33

New Forest

69

31

61

42

Rushmoor

91

9

28

25

Test Valley

53

47

36

19

Winchester

69

31

40

28

Portsmouth

94

6

16

15

Southampton

90

10

28

25

Isle of Wight

64

36

38

25

Ashford

33

67

16

5

Canterbury

61

39

18

11

Dartford

78

22

7

5

Dover

80

20

35

28

Gravesham

78

22

11

9

Maidstone

81

19

10

8

Sevenoaks

85

15

68

58

Shepway

55

45

26

14

Swale

45

55

20

9

Thanet

84

16

27

23

Tonbridge and Malling

68

32

14

10

Tunbridge Wells

91

9

45

41

Medway

84

16

29

24

Cherwell

37

63

27

10

Oxford

81

19

14

11

South Oxfordshire

89

11

31

28

Vale of White Horse

70

30

18

12

West Oxfordshire

41

59

26

11

Elmbridge

98

2

62

60

Epsom and Ewell

99

1

29

29

Guildford

94

6

29

27

Mole Valley

84

16

54

45

Reigate and Banstead

89

11

26

23

Runnymede

78

22

67

52

Spelthorne

98

2

32

31

Surrey Heath

96

4

62

59

Tandridge

92

8

34

31

Waverley

92

8

48

44

Woking

98

2

24

24

Adur

96

4

32

31

Arun

61

39

27

17

Chichester

62

38

36

22

Crawley

92

8

52

48

Horsham

66

34

27

18

Mid Sussex

72

28

28

21

Worthing

92

8

42

39

Total south east

67

33

33

22

1992

New dwellings on previously-developed land, excluding conversions, as a proportion of all new dwellings

New dwellings on NOT previously-developed land, as a proportion of all new dwellings (greenfield)

New dwellings on previously residential land as a proportion of all on previously developed land

New dwellings on previously residential land as a proportion of all new dwellings

Bracknell Forest

10

90

47

5

West Berkshire

52

48

61

32

Reading

77

23

19

15

Slough

75

25

56

42

Windsor and Maidenhead

69

31

48

33

Wokingham

73

27

30

22

Aylesbury Vale

41

59

48

20

South Bucks

57

43

48

27

Chiltern

55

45

65

36

Wycombe

70

30

25

17

Milton Keynes

0

100

14

0

Eastbourne

19

81

55

11

Hastings

37

63

9

3

Lewes

93

7

38

35

Rother

54

46

80

43

Wealden

76

24

28

21

Brighton and Hove

67

33

32

21

Basingstoke and Deane

41

59

44

18

East Hampshire

56

44

61

34

Eastleigh

47

53

50

23

Fareham

50

50

74

37

Gosport

100

0

26

26

Hart

29

71

50

15

Havant

79

21

46

37

New Forest

46

54

40

19

Rushmoor

75

25

33

25

Test Valley

38

62

51

19

Winchester

42

58

29

12

Portsmouth

90

10

40

36

Southampton

84

16

39

33

Isle of Wight

87

13

48

42

Ashford

52

48

55

28

Canterbury

54

46

56

30

Dartford

97

3

27

26

Dover

78

22

75

58

Gravesham

87

13

52

45

Maidstone

47

53

78

37

Sevenoaks

90

10

83

74

Shepway

27

73

29

8

Swale

70

30

34

24

Thanet

76

24

53

40

Tonbridge and Mailing

64

36

62

40

Tunbridge Wells

88

12

70

61

Medway

61

39

59

36

Cherwell

8

92

46

4

Oxford

21

79

98

21

South Oxfordshire

25

75

34

8

Vale of White Horse

14

86

75

10

West Oxfordshire

27

73

71

19

Elm bridge

77

23

49

38

Epsom and Ewell

99

1

82

81

Guildford

64

36

96

61

Mole Valley

95

5

27

26

Reigate and Banstead

73

27

24

18

Runnymede

94

6

41

38

Spelthorne

88

12

63

56

Surrey Heath

86

14

54

46

Tandridge

90

10

18

17

Waverley

79

21

65

51

Woking

86

14

33

29

Adur

46

54

100

46

Arun

67

33

38

25

Chichester

76

24

54

41

Crawley

7

93

Horsham

29

71

63

18

Mid Sussex

38

62

74

28

Worthing

49

51

87

43

Total South East

51

49

47

24

Average 1989 to 1992

New dwellings on previously-developed land, excluding conversions, as a proportion of all new dwellings

New dwellings on NOT previously-developed land, as a proportion of all new dwellings (greenfield)

New dwellings on previously residential land as a proportion of all on previously developed land

New dwellings on previously residential land as a proportion of all new dwellings

Bracknell Forest

14

86

55

8

West Berkshire

60

40

49

30

Reading

88

12

23

20

Slough

64

36

32

21

Windsor and Maidenhead

85

15

56

47

Wokingham

56

44

33

19

Aylesbury Vale

29

71

46

13

South Bucks

74

26

54

40

Chiltern

76

24

71

54

Wycombe

76

24

35

26

Milton Keynes

4

96

50

2

Eastbourne

42

58

49

21

Hastings

43

57

32

14

Lewes

56

44

42

24

Rother

68

32

51

35

Wealden

57

43

48

28

Brighton and Hove

81

19

65

53

Basingstoke and Deane

46

54

45

21

East Hampshire

59

41

69

41

Eastleigh

26

74

57

15

Fareham

42

58

58

25

Gosport

80

20

45

36

Hart

43

57

62

27

Havant

74

26

80

59

New Forest

48

52

56

27

Rushmoor

80

20

36

29

Test Valley

40

60

47

19

Winchester

49

51

40

20

Portsmouth

88

12

35

31

Southampton

80

20

46

36

Isle of Wight

68

32

52

36

Ashford

41

59

65

27

Canterbury

65

35

55

36

Dartford

88

12

26

23

Dover

63

37

40

25

Gravesham

71

29

35

25

Maidstone

53

47

43

23

Sevenoaks

75

25

67

50

Shepway

53

47

33

17

Swale

73

27

28

20

Thanet

72

28

29

21

Tonbridge and Mailing

79

21

45

36

Tunbridge Wells

69

31

52

36

Medway

66

34

47

31

Cherwell

19

81

47

9

Oxford

48

52

35

17

South Oxfordshire

36

64

53

19

Vale of White Horse

30

70

48

14

West Oxfordshire

26

74

51

13

Elm bridge

75

25

55

41

Epsom and Ewell

77

23

64

49

Guildford

62

38

52

32

Mole Valley

76

24

60

46

Reigate and Banstead

78

22

43

33

Runnymede

87

13

66

57

Spelthorne

82

18

60

50

Surrey Heath

53

47

85

45

Tandridge

90

10

36

33

Waverley

79

21

66

52

Woking

86

14

59

51

Adur

72

28

66

47

Arun

63

37

60

38

Chichester

70

30

54

38

Crawley

17

83

32

6

Horsham

37

63

61

22

Mid Sussex

48

52

61

29

Worthing

63

37

69

44

Total South East

54

46

49

26

Note:

Some local authority figures are incomplete, therefore total includes estimates for missing or partial local authority returns. For this reason the total may not equal the sum of the districts.