Written Answers toQuestions
Monday 6 November 2006
Public Accounts Commission
National Audit Office
The information requested by my hon. Friend is not available. A number of Departments and other bodies spend government money in Africa. The National Audit Office record the cost of auditing the accounts of those bodies, and of the value for money studies they undertake, but no information is held on the cost of auditing the bodies’ activities in specific regions of the world. However, during the year to July 2006, as part of their audit of the main Departments involved in Africa, NAO staff visited Ghana, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Tunisia and Uganda to audit various UK government activities in those countries.
The Commission examines National Audit Office corporate plans, resource estimates and results on a regular basis. The Commission’s scrutiny programme includes examination of independent value for money reviews of the National Audit Office carried out by the office’s external auditors.
The external auditors have carried out some international comparisons as part of this work. The most recent comparisons were included in their report in 2004 on the effectiveness of the National Audit Office’s work in the context of achievements against the office’s target of securing for the taxpayer £8 savings for every £1 spent. The auditors concluded that the National Audit Office was more rigorous than any other similar organisation worldwide in the way in which it measured, recorded and reported the financial impact of its work.
The Commission continues to monitor the effectiveness of the office’s work on behalf of the House. Last week it carried out a further examination of the financial impacts achieved by the office and of its plans to increase the target to £9:1. I believe that the Comptroller and Auditor General and the National Audit Office provide an excellent service and excellent value for money for the House.
Leader of the House
Business of the House
The Standing Orders of the House require three days to be set aside for debates on estimates selected by the Liaison Committee and 20 days to be set aside for debates on matters selected by Opposition parties.
In addition to these commitments, there are a number of debates for which it is the practice to find time on the Floor of the House. These currently include two days ahead of European Council meetings, five days on different aspects of Defence, one day on Public Accounts Committee reports, one day on Welsh Affairs and one day on the annual report of the Intelligence and Security Committee.
The wider issue of the use of non-legislative Government time may be considered by the Select Committee on the Modernisation of the House of Commons in due course.
House of Lords Reform
As I made clear in my speech, having been asked by the Prime Minister to take responsibility for this important policy, the timings I mentioned were those I hoped to see achieved. But whether these hopes are met depends on many factors.
State Opening
The Office of the Leader of the House of Commons does not produce a press briefing pack on the state opening of Parliament. The Downing street Press Office and individual Government Departments do issue press notices on the Queen's Speech. Copies will be placed in the Library. Further informationon the Bills contained within it is available on theOffice of the Leader of the House website at www.commonsleader.co.uk, following the state opening of Parliament.
House of Commons Commission
Green Cards
Doorkeepers’ records show 252 green cards were completed on 1 November.
Pedestrian Access
Westminster city council has been contacted about drainage issues on St. Margaret's Street. The matter was referred via their highways defect reporting system and directly by letter. We await a response from Westminster City Council.
The Parliamentary Authorities are aware of the following representations on this issue:
(a) None from Members;
(b) One from Lord Monson;
(c) One from a member of the House staff.
Culture, Media and Sport
Tourism
The Government will not take any decisions on changes to local government finance until it has had the chance to consider the independent Lyons report which will be delivered to ministers in December 2006. DCMS Ministers will continue to represent tourism industry interests in this as in other cross-Government policy areas.
The Lyons Inquiry is an independent review, and it has not yet made any recommendations. DCMS Ministers will fully assess the potential impact of Sir Michael’s recommendations once he has made them, and will respond accordingly.
There are around 500 Tourist Information Centres in England. Most of them are managed by local authorities as part of their discretionary support for tourism. We know of four in rural areas that have been closed and not replaced by any other provision in the last 12 months, and two new ones that have opened.
VisitBritain
Since 1997 funding for VisitBritain has risen from £44.7 million to £50.5 million for the current financial year. Detailed discussions are taking place to determine future budgets in the context of the CSR.
Royal Parks
The number and type of events is limited according to criteria set out in the agency’s Events Strategy, agreed with Ministers and their potential impact on the environment, on visitors and on local residents is carefully assessed before permission is granted.
Event organisers are required to take out a bond to fund any reinstatement necessary after an event.
Digital Switchover
Ofcom estimated approximately 50 per cent. of households in the Calder Valley are currently able to receive DT services. Following switchover in the region DT capacity is intended to match current provision from analogue services.
Regulation of regional news resides with OFCOM. This framework will remain in place after switchover.
Television Licensing
The Government reviewed the concessionary arrangements as part of BBC Charter Review. The White Paper published in March this year proposed no changes to the existing range of concessions, because despite calls for concessions for many groups there was little consensus as to the criteria according to which they should be allocated. We have no plans for any further reviews of the concessions.
Decibel Penguin Prize
The decibel Penguin Anthology aims to showcase the work of emerging writers from black and minority ethnic communities and it received £8,000 from Arts Council England. Penguin is printing 3,000 copies, which will be distributed to book shops across the country. I understand that Penguin and Arts Council England are considering plans for two further volumes.
Olympic Games
I regret that it has not been possible to respond to the hon. Member in the time available before Dissolution.
Each annual budget will contain a contingency allowance from which cost over-runs will be met. As I said in the House on 6 November, in the event of further funds being needed to support the Olympic games, there is a formula in the M.O.U. to enable sharing between London and the lottery.
Tote
My Department has been discussing over the summer a sale to a racing consortium at full market value, but has unfortunately been unable to reach an agreement. We will announce shortly how we intend to meet the intentions of the manifesto, which were to achieve value for money for the taxpayer and to recognise racing's interest in the Tote.
Abolition of Slavery Bicentenary
I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Brent, South (Ms Butler) on 14 June 2006, Official Report, column 1222W. Since then English Heritage has announced its programme for 2007, which will include: researching for the first time connections between the transatlantic slave trade and properties in its care; and reviewing formal description of listed buildings to acknowledge historic links to transatlantic slavery and the abolitionist movement. In Scotland, the Scottish Executive are leading on plans for the bicentenary and they plan to devote a section of the One Scotland website to publicising bicentenary events.
To date, the Heritage Lottery Fund has awarded funding of over £20 million to 48 slavery-related projects. It’s new web-feature—http://www.hlf.org.uk/hlf/themes/index.html—provides advice on funding for community groups. Organisations which have recently received funding from HLF for 2007-related projects are:
Adeoti Arts and Crafts
Archbishop’s Council
Black British Heritage Ltd
Bread Youth Project
British Empire and Commonwealth Museum (BECM)
Childrens and Parents Alliance
Connections Northamptonshire and Northamptonshire CC Youth Involvement Team
Development Education in Dorset
Leeds West Indian Centre
Mary Seacole Trust
ODAC UK
SCAWADI Sparbrook Caribbean and African Women’s Development Initiative
Splendid Things
The Equiano Society
Theatre Royal, Plymouth
Tyne and Wear Museums
Charities
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State has not had any discussions with the Charity Commission regarding the eligibility of sporting organisations for charitable status.
Gambling Act
None. The remote gambling market was too small to be statistically significant when the first UK gambling prevalence study was conducted in 1999.
The Gambling Commission is currently conducting a new prevalence study and will report in September 2007.
Recent research by RSe Consulting, commissioned by my Department, has found that approximately 900,000 people in the UK regularly gamble by remote means. My Department’s own Taking Part survey suggests that nearly 5 per cent. of the population (in England) gambled online last year.
Sport England
[holding answer 2 November 2006]: Sport England has undergone a sustained and substantial programme of reform which means it now has a clear focus on:
(i) boosting participation in sport; and
(ii) significantly improving the range and quality of facilities.
The performance of Sport England will be judged against success in these two areas.
Theatre
The Department for Culture, Media and Sport does not fund the arts directly, but through Arts Council England, which is responsible for supporting the arts with public money from Government.
The following figures provide a breakdown of Arts Council England grant in aid for regularly funded theatre.
Arts Council England region 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 East 2,153 2,844 2,968 3,147 3,254 3,344 East Midlands 3,280 4,295 4,522 4,734 4,825 5,085 London 11,685 14,176 14,941 39,770 41,558 43,032 National1 34,095 36,668 39,235 1,045 1,086 1,117 North East 2,092 2,700 2,867 3,148 3,273 3,362 North West 5,619 7,159 7,377 8,159 8,455 8,805 South East 2,722 4,026 4,602 4,572 4,391 2,210 South West 2,680 4,432 4,557 5,200 5,252 5,396 West Midlands 3,101 4,103 4,307 18,373 18,878 19,397 Yorkshire 4,237 5,093 5,312 6,784 7,012 7,215 Total 71,664 85,496 90,688 94,932 97,984 98,963 1 National expenditure transferred to regional offices in 2005-06.
Within this funding Arts Council England classifies two theatre organisations as national companies.
Royal National Theatre Royal Shakespeare Company 2002-03 14,297 12,770 2003-04 14,810 13,270 2004-05 16,360 13,604 2005-06 17,261 14,000 2006-07 17,735 14,385 2007-08 18,223 14,780
Arts Council England does not categorise the remaining theatre organisations as “regional” or “local”, but as “producing” and “presenting”.
Support for organisations receiving regular funding from Arts Council England is set up to 2007-08. Future funding is contingent on the outcome of the current Government Comprehensive Spending Review.
Church Commissioners
Clergy Pensions
The pension benefits currently available to Church of England clergy reflect steps taken in the 1980s to improve the package. The scheme provides a full service pension of two thirds of the national minimum stipend plus a lump sum of three times the pension. This year, that means a pension of £12,040 and a lump sum of £36,120.
Transport
Accessible Transport
[holding answer 2 November 2006]: There are no plans to require car hire firms to provide wheelchair accessible vehicles to carry a passenger who remains seated in their wheelchair. However, the effect of the Disability Discrimination (Transport Vehicles) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/3190), which come into force on 4 December 2006, is to apply the duties in section 21(2) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (duty of providers of services to make adjustments) to vehicle rental firms in respect of vehicles comprising of eight passenger seats or less.
This means that, from 4 December, firms who hire out such vehicles will be under a duty to take such steps as are reasonable to alter the physical features of those vehicles so as to provide facilities for the stowage of a wheelchair. It will be for vehicle rental firms to determine, within the reasonableness test, how and the extent to which this requirement should be met.
A statutory code of practice has been produced by the Disability Rights Commission to assist car hire firms and others to understand and implement the new duties.
Buses
Local authorities already provide support for many bus services in areas of low car ownership. It is for individual local authorities to decide which services to support in their area. They should take account of accessibility planning when deciding their criteria for subsidised service support. The Department’s Guidance on Accessibility Planning specifically refers to the needs of those without access to a car as one of the factors to be taken into account.
Total local and central Government support for bus services is estimated to have been £1.8 billion in 2005-06, much of which will have been spent on safeguarding services.
We are currently taking a long, hard look at a whole range of bus issues to assess whether changes are necessary to improve delivery of our objectives, including those on accessibility and social inclusion.
The rural bus challenge was first introduced in 1998; five further annual competitions were held, the last being in 2003. A total of £110 million for 301 schemes was awarded to local authorities over that period.
There are currently no plans for further competitions under this scheme, which was aimed at developing and demonstrating the potential for innovative approaches to meeting rural transport needs. It was never intended to provide permanent revenue support for the projects supported. Information from local authorities shows that the scheme has encouraged the development of a large number of successful projects, many of which are now being continued with mainstream funding from local authorities, including funding from the Department's rural bus subsidy grant, or other sources.
Departmental Redundancies
The Department for Transport was created in May 2002.
There have not been any compulsory redundancies during that period. However there have been a small number of voluntary early redundancy/severance schemes.
Temporary staff are essentially used for short-term periods, usually to cover annual leave, sickness, or while managers are seeking a permanent replacement for a post.
The number of employed in the central Department for Transport, and its agencies since 2002 is as follows:
Number 2006 1,022 2005 1,468 2004 1,087 2003 1,210 2002 1,027
The numbers of inward secondments since 2002 are:
Number 2006 36 2005 49 2004 47 2003 15 2002 9
The Department is committed to trying to avoid compulsory redundancies and to use recruitment controls and voluntary means to achieve any essential reductions in staff numbers.
Through inward secondments, the Department believes that it benefits from the experience of a secondee (through specialist skills not available within the Department) by gaining a fresh perspective on the operation of its business, and establishing links with individuals who can be a useful source of advice to the Department in the future. It also benefits the secondee by providing them with an insight into the operation of government.
DVLA
A statement on the progress of introducing the 14 new measures which I announced on 24 July will be made shortly.
Free Bus Passes
This information is not held centrally, it can be obtained from the relevant local authorities.
Hand Luggage
[holding answer 19 October 2006]: International civil aviation security is framed by the principle of “host state responsibility”, whereby each state is responsible for the security of flights from its territory. It is for the relevant authority in each state to determine what items are prohibited at its airports from being carried in passengers' hand baggage. The International Civil Aviation Organisation offers advice to contracting states in this regard, and the UK and other states are working with ICAO to update that advice. Within the European Union there is a common list of prohibited items which applies at EU airports. This list, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/04/59&format=HTML&aged=0%3Cuage=EN&guiLanguage=en is presently being amended in light of the recent aviation security alert in the UK. It includes pointed or bladed articles capable of causing injury. ICAO's common list of prohibited items also includes pointed or bladed articles capable of causing injury.
IT Projects
The requested information could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. The following details relate to the DfT’s key IT projects that are monitored centrally.
Dept/ agency Project name Start date Original planned completion date Expected completion date Originally planned costs Estimated costs Note ref. DfT Shared Services Programme April 2005 April 2009 April 2009 31 45 1 VOSA Roadside Digital Tachograph January 2001 March 2005 March 2007 9.19 8.95 — VOSA Commercial Customer Portal January 2004 December 2011 December 2011 9.5 21.72 2 VOSA Operator Annual Test: E-Test Bookings January 2004 December 2011 December 2011 8.4 11.97 3 VOSA Mobile Compliance: providing mobile compliance devices to Enforcement Officers March 2003 December 2004 March 2007 7.91 10.39 4, 5 DVLA Driver Licensing: Drivers Re-engineering Project (DRP) phase 2 August 2003 September 2008 End 2008 1 09 102.9 6, 7 DVLA Smart tachograph project July 2000 May 2002 February 2007 13.2 14.72 — DVLA Vehicles System Software (VSS) Replatforming January 2005 July 2006 June 2007 8.37 8.42 — DVLA Tracking Vehicles Through The Trade (TV3T) August 2005 June 2008 October 2008 18.64 18.64 — DVLA Driver Licence Upgrade (DLUP) July 2004 June 2007 March 2008 21.8 17.04 — DSA Integrated Register of Driver Trainers (IRDT) October 2003 January 2006 February 2007 1.5 3.5 — HA Traffic Control Centre: PPP service; providing co-ordinated real time information on traffic conditions across most strategic road network August 2001 August 2011 August 2011 1160 1160 — HA Electronic Service Delivery of Abnormal Loads (ESDAL) April 2004 August 20062 August 20062 28.6 28.97 — April 2004 July 20083 July 20093 31.21 31.21 — 1 Over 10 years. 2 Development. 3 Operation. Notes explaining any variance in planned vs. expected data or divergence from information contained in PQ 2324 03/04: 1. The Shared Services programme is currently being replanned, so the estimated costs provided are likely to change in the near future. 2. The scope of the portal project has increased since original approval to include new elements such as the adoption of sophisticated data integration and management applications. 3. The scope of E-test bookings has increased since original approval to include a multi-channel solution. 4. The difference in completion date is due to an increase in project scope to include fixed penalties. 5. Original planned costs for Mobile Compliance did not include staff costs however, estimated costs to complete include staff costs from April 2005. 6. The previous PQ (2324 03/04) only relates to phase 1. The cost of £37 million with a delivery date of December 2005 was achieved within approved funding. These details have been updated to include phase 2. 7. The estimated completion date is currently subject to change pending a current re-scoping exercise.
Low Bridges
The number of personal injury road accidents involving buses striking bridges that occurred in the last three years is given in the following table.
Accidents Fatal Serious Slight All 2003 0 3 8 11 2004 0 2 11 13 2005 1 2 10 13 1 Buses and coaches equipped to carry 17 or more passengers, regardless of use. 2 Includes accidents where the side or roof of the bus struck the bridge.
Ministerial Travel
All travel is conducted in accordance with the requirements of the ministerial code, Travel by Ministers and the Civil Service Management Code.
The Secretary of State for Transport made six journeys by air and eight journeys by rail in his official capacity between 18 September 2006 and 18 October 2006.
The Government Car and Despatch Agency (GCDA) is responsible for providing ministerial transport by car. GCDA does not keep a record of individual journeys nor details of passengers carried.
All central Government ministerial and official air travel is being offset from 1 April 2006. Departmental aviation emissions are calculated on an annual basis and subsequently offset through payments to a central fund. The fund purchases Certified Emissions Reductions credits from energy efficiency and renewable energy projects with sustainable development benefits, located in developing countries.
Carbon dioxide emissions arising from 32 (Royal) Squadron flights are included in the Government's carbon offsetting commitment. Carbon emissions arising from the use of these flights will be recorded and offset in the same way as the use of scheduled flights.
MOT
In the event of disruption to the MOT computerisation service, there are currently two business continuity procedures which are available to garages to ensure that they can continue to test vehicles. One militates against a failure of the local garage computer equipment whilst the other militates against a large scale database or telephone outage. There should therefore be very few circumstances under which garages incur either (a) loss of earnings or (b) additional costs as a result of technical difficulties with the MOT computerisation system. The Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) would, however, consider claims for compensation where a garage could demonstrate that it had suffered financially as a result of these business continuity procedures being unavailable.
Northern Ireland Airports
The Chief Justice (or occupant of the highest judicial office in each country) is included in the category of passengers that are exempt from screening at UK airports. However, other members of the judiciary are not included.
Railways
Proposals (entitled the "Gateway" scheme) have been put forward by Birmingham city council and Network Rail for the substantial re-development of New Street Station. The business case for this scheme is currently being examined in depth by the Department, as a considerable sum of public funding is required for the purpose. I would anticipate being able to make an announcement during 2007.
The Government have no plans to appoint regional railway tsars.
The Secretary of State for Transport has had no direct discussions with Angel Trains and Porterbrook recently. However, departmental officials have regular bi-laterals with the managing directors of both these companies and there is also engagement on a regular basis at a working level.
On 28 June 2006 the Department for Transport initiated steps for a market investigation by asking the Office of Rail Regulation to refer the passenger rolling stock leasing market to the Competition Commission under Section 131 of the Enterprise Act 2002. The timetable set out by the Office of Rail Regulation is to publish their conclusions by the end of November 2006.
Payments to and premiums received from individual train operators in any given year (TOCs) are set out in table 4.2c of National Rail Trends, copies of which are in the Library of the House. Contracted subsidies and premiums to and from individual TOCs are published on the Department’s website when the relevant franchise is let. Actual payments and premiums in future years will depend on a number of factors including the operational performance of Network Rail and the TOC in question and the precise terms of the relevant franchise agreement. Where no franchise agreement is in place for the future years, premiums or subsidies will depend on the outcome of negotiations in the franchise specification and replacement process.
(2) whether revenue generated by Rail Franchise premiums is hypothecated for use by his Department (a) for any use and (b) on rail projects.
Forecast premiums from passenger franchises are included in the Department’s future spending plans. All premiums paid by franchises are appropriated in aid by the Department and the funds are made available for spending on transport.
The Secretary of State will publish a high-level output specification (HLOS) in summer 2007. The HLOS will set out the Government’s spending and output priorities for the rail industry for the next control period and will inform the Office of Rail Regulation’s next review of access charges. The HLOS will include advice on the funds that the Secretary of State has available for spending on rail.
Roads
2005 is the earliest year for which this information is available.
(2) what the estimated effect on annual carbon dioxide emissions is resulting from each road scheme approved by Ministers through the local transport plans since 1997.
The CO2 impacts of road schemes approved through the Targeted Programme of Improvements (TPI) and Local Transport Plans (LTPs) form part of the Department’s normal approval processes for major transport schemes.
The Department’s National Transport Model (NTM) has been used to estimate the CO2 impact of road improvements at a national level.
The road build included in our national modelling is the Highways Agency’s (HA) illustrative forward programme of schemes. This includes those schemes since 2000 in the TPI, plus an estimate of schemes that may make their way into the TPI going forward.
The modelling carried out for the Future of Transport White Paper included this HA illustrative programme, with it adding around 0.15 million tonnes of carbon in 2010, in England. The carbon added from just the current TPI would, therefore, be somewhat less than this, although that from local transport plans might increase it.
The TPI schemes were also appraised at an individual level. CO2 emission estimates for the HA’s motorway and trunk road schemes, in the TPI (which was first launched in 1998) are given where data is currently available. A copy of the table showing this information has been placed in the House of Commons Library. Schemes that have not yet entered into the TPI do not have this information as the proposals are still at an early stage.
The overall implications for CO2 emissions of LTPs, including roads, should be considered as part of their individual Strategic Environmental Assessments.
For (a) Highways Agency schemes in the Targeted Programme of Improvements, I refer the hon. Member to the answer of 24 July 2006, Official Report, column 746W, to the hon. Member for Brent, South (Ms Butler).
I have placed information on (b), the latest cost estimates for road schemes approved under (i) the local transport plans and (ii) community infrastructure fund, in the Library of the House.
I refer the hon. member to the written answers given on 17 October 2006, Official Report, columns 1137-38W, and 26 October 2006, Official Report, columns 2000-01W, to my hon. Friend the Member for Vale of Clwyd (Chris Ruane).
Those provided data on government and private funding for transport infrastructure in Great Britain. The expenditure for roads within the tables includes new construction, as well as patching works. The available expenditure data do not, however, identify new road construction as a separate category.
Seat Belts
Sections 14 and 15 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 contain the primary legislation. Both were first amended by the Road Traffic Amendment Act 1988 (Amendment) Regulations 1992 (SI 1992/3105).
Section 15 was subsequently amended by section 83 of and schedule 8 to the Road Traffic Act 1991, which made a consequential deletion. Section 14 was amended by section 100 of the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003 in respect of the exception for delivery drivers.
The Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts) Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/176) and the Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts by Children in Front Seats) Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/31) contain the detailed regulations made under the 1988 Act. These regulations were amended by:
The Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts)(Amendment) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/27) in respect of the exemption for delivery drivers;
The Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (Consequential and Supplementary Amendments to Secondary Legislation) Order 2006 (SI 2006/594) in respect of an exemption for SOCA officers in the course of duty; and
The Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004 (Consequential Amendments) (England) Order 2004 (SI 2004/3168) in relation to England, and the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004 (Consequential Amendments) (Wales) Order 2005 (SI 2005/2929) in relation to Wales and the Fire (Scotland) Act 2005 (Consequential Modifications and Amendments) (No. 2) Order 2005 (SSI 2005/344), in respect of changing references in an exemption from “fire brigade” to “fire and rescue services”.
The 1988 Act and both sets of regulations made in 1993 were further amended by the Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts)(Amendment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1892) and the Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts by Children in Front Seats)(Amendment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/2213) in respect of changes required to implement the requirements of directive 2003/20/EC.
Further amendments are proposed to the regulations to require children aged three to 13 years to use seat belts in buses and coaches. This is a requirement of directive 2003/20/EC and is subject to further public consultation, which we hope to publish later this year.
Amendments are also required to the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986 (SI 1986/1078) as well as to the seat belt wearing regulations in relation to the requirement to use child restraints to the approved standards of UNECE Regulation 44/03 and directive 77/541/EEC and any subsequent adaptations. These are being prepared following consultation.
Transport Innovation Fund
I refer the hon. Member to the statement that the Secretary of State made on the Transport Innovation Fund on 27 June 2006, Official Report, column 6WS.
Vehicle Registration (Cambridgeshire)
The number of licensed cars registered to addresses in Cambridgeshire was as follows:
Number 1996 228,585 1997 238,813 1998 246,264 1999 259,804 2000 266,873 2001 274,011 2002 280,510 2003 284,805 2004 290,870 2005 296,688
Figures are as at 31 December in each year. Statistics for South Cambridgeshire and East Cambridgeshire are unavailable.
Solicitor-General
Departmental IT
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has a 10-year public finance initiative partnership with LogicaCMG to modernise information technology in the service. The contract with LogicaCMG covers the provision and support of the hardware and software applications used by the CPS. These include: the CPS Case Management System; the Management Information System; the Witness Management System; and the Payroll, Human Resources and Corporate Information System. The CPS owns the data contained within the databases.
The Treasury Solicitors Department (TSol) has five databases, each of which is wholly owned and operated by external organisations or individuals. These are: the LION intranet database which is operated by SCISYS Ltd. and contains data owned by TSol which are updated interdepartmentally and managed by the Government Legal Service; the Penserver database, a pensions database containing data owned by TSol which is operated by Paymaster and operated on behalf of TSol and the Cabinet Office; the ePayfact database, a payroll database containing data owned by TSol and operated by LogicaCMG; the BV (Bona Vacantia) auction website database called URLS.co.uk which is operated by XM London, and contains data whichare owned and managed by BV and updated interdepartmentally.
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) operates three database systems. The Payroll system is provided externally by LogicaCMG on secure UK sites and contains data owned by the SFO. The SFO's evidence management system, Docman, is an internally operated system containing data owned by the SFO. It is maintained by SunGard Vivista; the SFO's IT services supplier.
HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI) interrogates and utilises databases operated by the Crown Prosecution Service and the Treasury Solicitor's Department, which are both supported by LogicaCMG.
All of the databases that the Law Officer's Departments use are located in the UK.
Diplomatic Immunity
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) holds no central record of the number of prosecutions which did not proceed owing to a claim of diplomatic immunity. The information is held on individual case files, and could be recovered only by examining every relevant file in each CPS office. This information can, therefore, be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Legal Costs
This information is not held centrally. The information is held on individual case files, and could be recovered only by examining every relevant file. This information can, therefore, only be obtained at disproportionate cost.
Ministerial Travel
All central Government ministerial and official air travel is being offset from 1 April 2006. Departmental aviation emissions are calculated on an annual basis and subsequently offset through payments to a central fund. The fund purchases certified emissions reductions credits from energy efficiency and renewable energy projects with sustainable development benefits, located in developing countries.
Ministerial Visits
Since October 2005 I have made one visit to Northern Ireland and no visits to Wales.
Victim Compensation
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) holds no central record of requests or awards for compensation. The information is held on individual case files, and could be obtained only by examining every relevant file in each CPS office. This information can, therefore, be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Aberdeen Angus Cattle
There is no scheme of assistance designed specifically for farmers of Aberdeen Angus cattle. However, such farmers may be eligible for financial assistance under one of the DEFRA-run rural funding schemes. Further information is available on the DEFRA website at:
www.defra.gov.uk/funding/who/farm.htm.
Administration
(2) what estimate he has made of the administrative burden in his Department in each year since 1997; and what progress has been made towards the target of a reduction of 25 per cent. in the administrative burden.
DEFRA participated in the cross-Government administrative burden measurement exercise carried out by Price Waterhouse Coopers (PwC) on behalf of the Cabinet Office. The exercise used an internationally agreed model, recommended to the Government by business, to establish a baseline.
As the first UK Government to take this radical approach to managing the regulatory burden, there is no comparative data before 2005 when the PwC exercise was carried out. However, we will shortly be publishing a revised DEFRA Simplification Plan. Copies will be placed in the Library. The revised Plan will update action taken since the November 2005 Initial Simplification Plan “Lifting the Burden”. It will also take account of the outcome of the PwC measurement exercise and identify progress towards meeting DEFRA's commitment to reduce the overall administrative burden imposed on stakeholders by 25 per cent.
Age Discrimination
The information is as follows.
(i) Defra maintains an age profile of its work force.
(ii) The Department has reviewed its policies and will continue to review new policies to ensure they meet the requirements of the age legislation. The trade unions have been involved in this process and will continue to be involved.
(iii) and (iv) All employees regardless of age have responsibility for regularly reviewing their training needs with their managers. Attendance at training courses for work purposes is always paid.
All employees can request flexible working either for downshifting to retirement or for any other reason. Line managers have responsibility to ensure all such requests are fully considered and where flexible working is not agreed, to support their decision with robust and objective justification. This is in line with the “Delivering a Diverse Civil Service” initiative.
Agricultural Support
[holding answer 2 November 2006]: The following table shows payments made through CAP schemes and Rural Development Programmes to farmers in the United Kingdom for the period 2001 to 2005 as recorded in the production and income account of the economic account for agriculture. They exclude payments made through the Over Thirty Month Scheme, compensation for losses due to animal disease and capital transfers. The proportion of EU funding for each scheme is shown in the right hand column.
£ million Calendar years 2001 2002 2003 2004 20052 EU funding (percentage) Crop subsidies Arable Area payments (except set-aside) 827 875 924 901 0 100 Arable Area Payments on set-aside 180 143 177 129 — 100 Other crop subsidies3 3 2 3 12 11 100 Livestock subsidies 100 Beef Special Premium4 241 236 238 266 — 100 Suckler Cow Premium4 219 204 208 230 — 100 Slaughter Premium 76 133 136 156 — 100 Extensification Payment Scheme 118 137 145 154 — 100 Beef National Envelope 19 34 34 36 — 100 Scottish Beef Calf Scheme — — — — 20 100 Sheep Annual Premium 181 264 276 300 — 100 Sheep National Envelope — 10 10 17 — 100 Dairy subsidies5 79 — — 108 — 100 Single Payment Scheme — — — — 2375 100 Rural Development Programmes: Less favoured areas support schemes6 165 165 163 153 144 Agri-environment schemes: Countryside Stewardship and Schemes that are part of Rural Development Programmes are partly EU funded. Funding may be up to 50 per cent. depending on the national contribution to the scheme7. Arable Stewardship Schemes 43 59 71 104 114 7— Countryside Premium and Rural Stewardship Schemes 9 9 13 11 10 7— Tir Cymen and Tir Gofal 10 13 17 21 24 7— Countryside Management Scheme 1 3 3 6 3 7— Organic Aid and Organic Farming Schemes 18 22 21 14 10 7— Environmentally Sensitive Areas Scheme 70 73 81 82 79 7— Nitrate Sensitive Areas Scheme 2 2 — — — 7— Other8 3 3 4 3 3 7— 1 Shows payments after deduction for modulation where appropriate. 2 Provisional. 3 CAP hops and herbage seeds support; hemp and flax aid; oilseed rape and linseed support; protein crop premium; area aid for nuts; energy crops aid. 4 Includes extensification premium and deseasonalisation premium. 5 Includes agri-monetary compensation; dairy premium and additional dairy premium. 6 Tir Mynydd in Wales, Less Favoured Area Compensatory Allowance Scheme in Northern Ireland, Less Favoured Areas Support Scheme in Scotland and Hill Farm Allowance in England. 7 As shown in the table. 8 Includes Moorland, Habitat and Countryside Access Farming schemes; Entry Level Pilot Scheme.
Animal Welfare
Approximately 65 per cent. of breeding pigs (290,000 sows and gilts) are kept in farrowing crates for part of the production cycle. There are strict time limits for the length of time that sows can be kept in farrowing crates. The farrowing crates protect piglets from crushing by the sow—one of the largest causes of pig mortality. We feel it is important to protect the welfare of the piglet as well as the sow.
We would, however, prefer to avoid close confinement of sows. DEFRA has funded research to investigate and develop viable farrowing systems that do not confine the sow, but provide adequate protection to piglets. Some such alternative systems seem promising in an experimental environment, but in others, piglet mortality has been unacceptably high. It remains the case that results need to be replicated consistently under commercial conditions. As yet, the risk of piglet mortality in alternative farrowing systems remains unacceptably high.
We would prefer to avoid the close confinement of all sows, but there are currently no free-farrowing systems suitable for widespread commercial adoption. Farrowing crates protect piglets from being crushed by the sow, one of the largest causes of pig mortality. The time limit on how long sows may be kept in farrowing crates is from seven days before the predicted day of farrowing until the piglets are weaned. After this period, sows must be moved back to loose housing accommodation in which they are free to turn round easily.
DEFRA has funded research to develop and test commercially viable farrowing systems which do not closely confine the sow but provide adequate protection to piglets. Some alternative systems seem promising in an experimental environment but it remains the case that results need to be replicated consistently under commercial conditions. As yet, the risk of piglet mortality in alternative farrowing systems remains unacceptably high.
Our research, and that of other European Union (EU) member states, will contribute to the European Food Safety Authority's examination of a number of issues, including farrowing systems. This work will lead to the next review of the EU Directive on pig welfare, scheduled for 2008. We look forward to working with other member states and the European Commission on this review.
Basking Sharks
The population abundance and density of basking sharks in any sea area of the world is not known. Monitoring of the UK population of basking sharks has largely been based on sightings of sharks feeding on plankton near the sea surface during spring and summer. Three public sighting recording schemes are presently under way in the UK (The Marine Conservation Society Basking Shark Watch; Seaquest South-West and Solway Shark Watch). The MCS scheme has been running for 20 years and it has observed over 24,000 animals.
Current research (by the Marine Biological Association/Cefas) on basking sharks is using modern satellite telemetry to provide valuable information on movements and behaviour of basking sharks in the north-east Atlantic. Information uncovered to date on the geographical movement of individual sharks suggests that despite making long-distance movements they remain in the vicinity of the continental shelf around the UK, Ireland and northern France. These findings have been consolidated with sightings data from UK charities (MCS, IFAW, Shark Trust, Wildlife Trusts, Hebridean Whale and Dolphin Trust) as part of a three-year Esmee Fairbairn Foundation-funded grant to MBA. The project is bringing together in a single database all recent data on basking shark distribution and this means that it is now possible to undertake comprehensive analyses of trends.
Nevertheless, there is no current reliable population estimate for basking sharks in UK (or European) waters. This is due to the difficulties in relating surface sightings to actual population size. While the broad distribution patterns of basking sharks in UK waters are being uncovered by sightings data, new research using telemetry data suggests there are considerable differences in the density distributions of the animal, with animals 60 times more likely to be at the surface (and thus sighted) in mixed water fronts than stratified water fronts. Genetic research is also under way to determine whether populations of basking sharks are discrete or if there is population mixing between the north-east Atlantic region and elsewhere.
Basking sharks are protected in British territorial waters under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. This gives the shark protection out to 12 nautical miles.
It is difficult to designate specific areas for basking sharks given their mobility in UK waters. This would be more appropriate if we are able to identify areas which are key to these animals’ life cycle, such as, important feeding grounds or breeding grounds, or known mating areas that the animals consistently return to. At present, we do not know enough about these animals. A provision is currently being considered as part of the marine Bill to designate marine protected areas. This means that, as our scientific knowledge improves we will be able to adapt our approach to the conservation of this species, which may include the designation of marine protected areas if deemed appropriate.
The Department is in regular contact with the Scottish Executive on a wide range of nature conservation issues, including discussions on basking sharks.
Biofuels
(2) what steps he is taking to ensure that farmers are able to take full advantage of the potential of agriculture to produce (a) biofuels, (b) biomass and (c) other alternative sources of energy.
As part of our overall strategy for improving sustainability and reducing the impact of climate change, the Government support the use of biomass sources for the generation of heat and electricity. We are aware of the potential of biomass energy for agriculture and we are working closely with farmers and industry to develop markets and promote uptake.
DEFRA’s Energy Crops Scheme, part of the 2000-06 England Rural Development Programme, provides grants to farmers to establish short rotation coppice (SRC) and miscanthus. The scheme is now closed for applications. The Government have agreed in principle to support the establishment of energy crops under the new Rural Development Programme, which will run from 2007 to 2013, and are currently considering how best to take this forward.
The European Union’s annual €45 per hectare energy aid payment is available to farmers for purpose-grown energy crops grown on non set-aside land.
Farmers can also receive the single payment for purpose-grown energy crops on set-aside or where the European Union’s €45 per hectare energy aid payment is claimed for crops on non set-aside land.
Support for energy crops is provided by R and D funding from DEFRA. This underpins an expansion in the commercial breeding programme. The aim is to double the output of new varieties by developing crops with maximised yield and resistance to fungal diseases and pests. Studies are also looking at the development of non-pesticide control strategies and potential new energy crops such as switch grass and reed canary grass.
The Community Renewables Initiative aims to stimulate community-based partnerships in England to develop renewable energy, including biomass in their localities.
In 2004, the Government commissioned a Biomass Task Force, led by Sir Ben Gill, to identify the barriers to developing bio-energy and to recommend ways to overcome the problems. They published their report in October 2005. In April 2006, the Government published their response1 to the Task Force’s report. This response accepts that energy from crops, trees and waste can make a strong contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and sets out 12 key initiatives and over 60 associated actions to make this happen. A number of the initiatives have already begun, and we published initial information on these in April 2006.
1 www.defra.gov.uk/farm/acu/energy/biomass-taskforce
Under CAP Single Payment Scheme arrangements crops can be grown for energy use on set-aside land. An additional €45 per hectare payment can also be claimed if crops are grown for energy use on non set-aside land. There are specific requirements placed upon growers and processors of crops in these circumstances. The current regime is, however, subject to review and the UK, along with other member states, is working closely with the Commission to seek simplification of the relevant regulations.
The following table details the hectares of miscanthus and short rotation coppice established in England under the Energy Crops Scheme. The figures are cumulative. It also details the growth rate in establishment of these crops since the introduction of the scheme in 2000.
Hectares Short rotation coppice Miscanthus Total established Growth rate (percentage) 2002 298 52 350 50 2003 391 52 443 27 2004 498 354 852 92 2005 788 1,011 1,799 111 2006 1,180 3,356 4,536 152 2001 233 0 233 —
The objective of the energy crops scheme is to encourage the establishment of energy crops grown in England. Energy crops are carbon-neutral and, therefore, as a substitute for fossil fuels, can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The following table details the hectares of energy crops established in England under the energy crops scheme since its introduction in 2000.
Short rotation coppice Miscanthus Total 2001 233.2 0 233.2 2002 64.5 51.56 116.1 2003 93.71 0 93.71 2004 106.5 302 408.4 2005 290.1 657.9 948 2006 392.2 2,345 2,737 Total 1,180 3,356 4,537
Applications for planting in 2007 indicate a continuing increase in uptake. These figures show the energy crops scheme to be a viable and attractive option for farmers.
Birds and Habitats Directives
The areas which currently meet the requirements for designation as special protection areas (SPA) and special areas of conservation (SAC) in Gibraltar are the Rock of Gibraltar Site of Community Importance (SCI)1 and the Southern Waters of Gibraltar SCI.
There are also two potential SPAs2 in Gibraltar which are currently the subject of a consultation process.
British Sovereign Base Areas (SBAs) on Cyprus are not subject to “Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora” (the Habitats Directive) and Council Directive “79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds” (the Birds Directive). However, the Administration take environmental management issues seriously and have, for example, taken steps to designate the Akrotiri Salt Lake, the largest aquatic system in Cyprus, as a Wetland of International Importance under the Ramsar Convention.
Currently available information suggests that the following areas would qualify as SPAs and SACs:
i. Akrotiri Peninsula (SPA and SAC)
ii. Areas within the boundaries of Episkopi village including the Garrison Episkopi Forest and the coastline (SPA and SAC)
iii. Cape Pyla (SAC with some features that probably qualify as SPA)
iv. Akhna Dam (a very small part within the SBA as SPA).
1 Sites of Community Importance are candidate SACs which have been adopted by the European Commission.
2 Potential SPAs are sites which have received ministerial approval for consultation, the results of which will form the basis for final classification.
Bovine Tuberculosis
We issued a News Release on 12 July drawing attention to the publication of the summary of responses and the report of Citizens' Panels held to consider badger culling as part of the consultation. The consultation was invaluable in helping us to hear from all sides of the badger culling debate and our aim is to take decisions that are sustainable and practical in the long term. There are no plans to issue an additional response to the consultation.
Both reports are available on the Defra website at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/badgers-tbcontrols/responses-summary.pdf and http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/badgers-tbcontrols/citizens-panels.pdf.
[holding answer 1 November 2006]: Monitoring the effectiveness of pre-movement testing is ongoing. Key statistics are updated monthly and published on the DEFRA website at:
http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/tb/premovement/monitoring-data.htm.
Chemical Sprays
The approvals process for pesticides assesses the risk posed to people and the environment from pesticide spray drift. If the risk assessment is not satisfactory then that pesticide use would not be approved.
This rigorous risk assessment process is backed up by a code of practice for using plant protection products (pesticides) which includes a range of practical measures to avoid spray drift. These include using the right spraying techniques and equipment and taking account of weather conditions.
The code emphasises the need to protect members of the public, wildlife and the wider environment. It is the pesticide users’ responsibility to ensure that all reasonable precautions are taken to prevent spray drift. It is a legal requirement that pesticides must only be applied to the land, crop, structure or other area being treated.
Chlorofluorocarbons
Under the Montreal Protocol, and EC Regulation 2037/2000 on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, the production and consumption of ozone depleting chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) is banned, except for essential uses in pharmaceutical metered dose inhalers agreed by Parties to the Protocol. Under the EC Regulation, there are exceptions for some military uses and some laboratory uses. As alternatives continue to become available, and military conversion programmes are completed, the need for CFCs in these applications will reduce.
Climate Change
Al Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth” was released in the UK on 15 September 2006. According to the distributors, United International Pictures, the film has been seen by 125,000 people. By the time the film is released worldwide, the global audience will be around 5 million.
The film will be released as a DVD on 21 November 2006, with a potential worldwide audience of 10-20 million.
On July 27, the Secretary of State hosted an advanced viewing event of “An Inconvenient Truth” at Bafta in London. The 190 attendees included journalists, students, representatives from various local authorities, large membership organisations, representatives from the voluntary and community sectors, environmental groups and key individuals from executive agencies and funded bodies. Feedback suggested the film is likely to be highly effective in inspiring those who watch it to do more to tackle climate change.
The 2006 UK Climate Change Programme contains a package of measures and commitments that will help reduce the UK’s emissions of greenhouse gases to about 23.6 per cent. below base year levels and carbon dioxide emissions to 16.2 per cent. below 1990 levels by 2010. In addition, the recently published Energy Review set out ambitious proposals to get us on course to achieve real progress in emissions reductions by 2020 and put us on the right path to achieving our goal of 60 per cent. reduction in carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. The package will deliver between 19 to 25 million tonnes of carbon savings by 2020.
The UK is therefore on course to meet and go substantially beyond its Kyoto target of a reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases by 12.5 per cent. below 1990 levels by 2008-12.
The Government will be reporting on progress with these targets via an annual report to Parliament.
UK greenhouse gas emissions projections take into account the latest population projections from the Office for National Statistics. DEFRA has not made any specific analysis of the impacts of immigration on greenhouse gas emissions.
The successful and unsuccessful bids from local authorities for funding from the Climate Change Fund are set out in the following table:
Local authority 2006-07 2007-08 Total London Royal borough of Kensington and Chelsea 18,450.00 3,550.00 22,000.00 London borough of Lewisham 74,950.00 30,150.00 105,100.00 Greater London authority 229,500.00 187,500.00 417,000.00 London borough of Bromley 30,000.00 30,000.00 London borough of Sutton 73,000.00 75,750.00 148,750.00 South East Crawley borough council 124,747.00 125,949.00 250,696.00 South West Somerset county council 124,900.00 113,600.00 238,500.00 West Midlands Stoke on Trent city council 50,354.00 47,953.00 98,307.00 Shropshire county council 13,000.00 7,000.00 20,000.00 North East Sunderland city council 20,500.00 15,000.00 35,500.00 Yorkshire and Humber City of Bradford metropolitan district council 94,900.00 106,000.00 200,900.00 Kingston Upon Hull city council 42,689.00 68,728.00 111,417.00 East Midlands Derby city council 50,000.00 51,480.00 101,480.00 Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire Local Authorities’ Energy Partnership 207,500.00 171,500.00 379,000.00 The Wellingborough Partnership 6,700.00 — 6,700.00 East of England Ipswich borough council 44,098.00 — 44,098.00
Unsuccessful local authorities
London
London borough of Lewisham (2nd application)
London borough of Bexley
Royal borough of Kensington and Chelsea (2nd application)
London borough of Hillingdon
London borough of Ealing
London borough of Havering
South East
Chichester district council
Arun district council
Woking borough council
Bracknell Forest borough council
Elmbridge borough council
Royal borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Hampshire county council
Basingstoke and Deane borough council
Slough borough council
Southampton city council
Eastbourne borough council
Lewes district council
Guildford borough council
Kent county council
Maidstone borough council
South West
Devon county council
Swindon borough council
Penwith district council
Teignbridge district council
Warwickshire county council
Redditch borough council
Malvern Hills district council
North West
Lancaster county council
Warrington borough council
Trafford metropolitan borough council
Carlisle city council
Manchester city council
Liverpool city council
North East
Scarborough borough council
Chester-le-Street district council (two applications)
Yorkshire and Humber
Selby district council
Rotherham metropolitan borough council
Kirklees metropolitan council
Wakefield district council
Harrogate borough council
Leeds city council
City of York council
North Yorkshire county council
East Riding of Yorkshire council
Scarborough borough council
East Midlands
Broxtowe borough council
Nottingham city council
East Midlands Regional Assembly
East of England
Breckland district council
Colchester borough council
Luton borough council
Essex county council
North Norfolk district council
Cambridgeshire county council
We are considering funding a second round of projects in 2007 to focus on changing people’s behaviour but a decision has not yet been taken. Any further rounds will be publicised and announced on our website, www. climatechallenge.gov.uk.
Consultants
The Department came into being in July 2001. The information held centrally is listed in the following table.
(£) 2002-03 15,317,093 2003-04 20,260,714 2004-05 78,671,992
Figures for the financial year 2004-05 include spending on management and business consultancy combined following reclassification of expenditure on professional services. Figures for previous financial years reflect expenditure on management consultancy alone.
From data held centrally, the information is as listed:
Financial year Value (£) 2002-03 15,317,093 2003-04 20,260,714 2004-05 78,671,992 2005-06 44,136,007 1 April 2006-27 September 2006 10,760,237
Figures for the financial years 2004-05 onward include spending on management and business consultancy combined following reclassification of expenditure on professional services. Figures for previous financial years reflect expenditure on management consultancy alone.
Cremation
(2) what assessment he has made of the effect on climate change of crematoria.
Crematoria are regulated by local authorities under the Pollution Prevention and Control Regulations 2000 (PPC). As such, they are subject to the provisions and limit values for all key emissions using the best available techniques (BAT). Statutory guidance on BAT is set out in DEFRA's Process Guidance Note PG5/2, which was reviewed and revised in 2004 and can be found at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/airquality/lapc/pgnotes/pdf/pg5-02.pdf.
Considerable improvements have already been made to crematoria emissions under the Environmental Protection Act 1990, which the PPC Regulations now replace. The latest guidance is aimed at reducing mercury emissions from all crematoria by 50 per cent. by the end of 2012, using an innovative burden sharing approach developed with the sector. I announced on 19 October, in a departmental press notice, our findings that the approach was proving successful, although we will be continuing to monitor the situation.
I am pleased to be able to announce that we will be issuing revised guidance to local authority regulators that we consider a lower temperature of 800oC, rather than 850oC, to be adequate to deal with emissions where crematoria are fitted with abatement equipment to achieve our required 50 per cent. reduction in mercury emissions. This will help reduce fuel usage and CO2 emissions. We will be discussing further with the cremation sector how to obtain evidence of whether any similar measures can be taken for crematoria not fitted with abatement, without compromising environmental protection.
The UK National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory does not report figures for any direct emissions of greenhouse gases from crematoria.
Departmental Dress Code
The Department’s commitment not to discriminate unfairly on the grounds of religion or belief is set out clearly in its equal opportunities policy.
The Department does not have a formal policy on the display of religious artefacts, symbols and dress by its staff. There have not been any disciplinary proceedings in relation to religion.
Departmental Expenditure
DEFRA expenditure on conference organisation and sponsorship through DEFRA Communications Directorate plus centrally recorded spend from DEFRA's financial chart of accounts during the last 12 months was £3,562,246.04 This is comprised of:
(£) Non-Pay Operational Costs of Conference Provision (i.e. administrative costs excluding DEFRA staff salaries) 814,373.78 UK/EU presidency in 2005—Residual Payments 97,622.42 Communications Directorate Facility Managed Conferences 600,803.51 G8 and European Union Presidency 1,242,684.72 G8 and International Climate Change 806,761.61 Total 3,562,246.04 Note:These figures do not include costs incurred by any DEFRA Agency/NDPB, as this information could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
DEFRA’s final Departmental Expenditure Limit (DEL) Budget and final DEL outturn for each year since its creation are shown in the following table.
Financial year Final DEL budget DEL outturn 2001-02 2,959,389 2,781,687 2002-03 2,469,291 2,320,880 2003-04 3,139,131 2,880,514 2004-05 3,480,986 3,317,788 2005-06 3,520,266 3,519,164 Note: 2005-06 figures are provisional
Departmental Staff
[holding answer 30 October 2006]: The information requested is as follows:
Number As at: 1 November 2004 367 1 April 2005 378 1 April 2006 403
Number As at: 1 November 2004 182 1 April 2005 198 1 April 2006 198
Number 1996 1— 1997 431 1998 431 1999 443 2000 587 2001 592 2002 629 2003 656 2004 645 2005 660 2006 648 1 No data available.
The MHS employed the following numbers of staff at its headquarters in York:
Financial year HQ staff 1995-96 39 1996-97 55 1997-98 73 1998-99 80 1999-2000 80 Note: Excludes individuals such as contractors who may have been working on site.
We are unable to provide data from 1994 (when the York site opened) up to 2003 as the work needed to provide this data would result in disproportionate costs.
The following table shows details of bonuses awarded to staff in DEFRA in each financial year since November 2004. Data prior to November 2004, is available only at disproportionate cost.
Period Number of staff awarded bonuses Proportion of work force (percentage) Total amount of bonuses paid (£) Highest bonus (£) November 2004 to March 2005 1513 6.7 179,879 7,616 April 2005 to March 2006 23,535 44.9 3,364,032 34,040 April 2006 to October 2006 31,019 13.9 1,362,657 15,000 (November) 2006 4(1,680) (23.1) (2,933,611) — 1 These figures represents in-year performance bonuses only, paid to staff at grade 6 or below. 2 This figure represents annual performance bonuses paid to staff in the SCS and at grade 6 and below. In addition it also includes in-year performance bonuses paid to staff at grade 6 and below. 3 This figure represents annual performance bonuses paid to staff in the SCS only and in-year performance bonuses paid to staff at grade 6 and below. 4 This figure includes annual performance bonuses about to be paid to staff at grade 6 and below in November salaries.
Separate performance bonus arrangements operate for staff in the SCS and those at Grade 6 and below.
For the SCS:
Non-consolidated cash payments, otherwise known as bonuses, reward in-year performances in relation to agreed objectives, or short term personal contribution to wider organisational objectives. Bonuses are paid in addition to base pay increases and do not count towards pension.
Bonuses are allocated by Departments from a “pot” expressed as a percentage of the SCS salary bill, which is agreed centrally each year following the SSRB recommendations. The intention is that bonus decisions should be differentiated in order to recognise the most significant deliverers of in-year performance.
For staff at grade 6 and below:
The High Performance Bonus Awards scheme introduced in April 2005, provide DEFRA staff with recognition and reward for delivery of an outstanding outcome or performance that significantly exceeds normal expectations. The process should provide staff at all grades with an opportunity to earn a bonus, and ensure that achievements in operational, policy and corporate services areas are recognised as being of equal esteem.
There are two types of award:
In-year high performance bonuses paid to individuals or teams in recognition of one-off achievements during the year; and
Annual high performance bonuses which are paid to the top 10 per cent. of performers in each DG for delivery of an outstanding outcome or performance sustained throughout the whole year.
“Gardening leave” is used very infrequently in exceptional circumstances and as a last resort; redeployment options and project work are always considered first. Decisions are taken at a business level and depend on circumstances and business need. Details, including costs, of such leave for former employees are not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Departmental Travel
This question can be answered only at disproportionate cost. However, in respect of overseas travel by Cabinet Ministers, since 1999 the Government have published an annual list of all visits undertaken by Cabinet Ministers costing £500 or more during each financial year. Where non-scheduled aircraft are used this is shown in the list. Information for 2005-06 was published on 24 July 2006. Copies of the lists are available in the Library for the reference of Members. All Ministers’ travel is undertaken in accordance with the rules set out in the “Ministerial Code and Travel by Ministers”, copies of which are available in the Library for the reference of Members. All official travel is undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the “Civil Service Management Code”, a copy of which is also available in the Library for the reference of Members.
Departmental Vacancies
DEFRA operates a competence-based recruitment system. GCSE English and/or maths are not specifically required because relevant experience can be used to support an application rather than educational qualifications.
Desmoulins Whorl Snails
(2) what estimate he has made of Desmoulins Whorl snail populations at sites of special scientific interest in each year to 2010; and if he will make a statement;
(3) what representations he has received on the effect on the Desmoulins Whorl snail population of the completion of the A34 Newbury bypass;
(4) what the Desmoulins Whorl snail population was in the sites of special scientific interest at (a) Rack Marsh, (b) Boxford, (c) Hunts Green and (d) Bagnor Island in each year since 1997; and if he will make a statement.
Since the public inquiry over the A34 Newbury bypass, knowledge of the Desmoulins Whorl snail distribution, ecology and conservation status has improved considerably. This has been achieved both through research and surveys (contracted by the former English Nature) and work undertaken by members of the Conchological Society of Great Britain and Ireland, including work undertaken in Europe.
The species is much more widespread in the UK than it was formerly thought to be and has been found in new areas of some other European countries. This is likely to be a result of under-recording in the past rather than an increase in its population. It is also less fastidious in its habitat requirements and less restricted to riparian areas than was previously thought.
Its populations fluctuate considerably at individual sites, depending on the wetness of the season and, consequently, its numbers on some parts of some sites of special scientific interest (SSSIs) have been reduced in recent drought years.
Rack Marsh, Hunts Green and Bagnor Island all form part of the Kennet and Lambourn SSSI and Boxford Watermeadow is a separate SSSI. Both sites are assessed as being in favourable condition. Whilst there have been population fluctuations of the snail, including absence on some of the drier areas, healthy populations remain elsewhere in the Kennet and Lambourn confluence floodplain both inside and outside the SSSIs.
This variation is to be expected, given the species' response to the humidity of its environment. Precise numbers are not recorded each year as this would be highly resource-intensive and unlikely to give meaningful results. However the Environment Agency and the Department for Transport have undertaken monitoring in a number of areas in the Kennet and Lambourn confluence floodplain.
This Department has not received any representations concerning the Desmoulins Whorl snail following the completion of the A34 Newbury bypass.
Dogs
We currently have no plans to re-introduce a dog licence. The Government support the approach taken by responsible dog owners who voluntarily have their pets permanently identified and registered on nationwide databases. The effectiveness of a dog licensing system is questionable; in the last year licences were administered (1988) only 44 per cent. of dog owners applied for a licence.
The EC Council Regulations 1/2005 will apply to the transport of animals in connection with an “economic activity”. The winning of prizes at shows and trials should not be regarded as making the transport of dogs to them commercial. However, the regulation will apply to the transport of dogs to shows and trials in connection with an economic activity, for example, that of professional dog breeders.
Those who breed dogs as a hobby will be excluded from the scope of the regulations providing that their income source does not exceed the expenses of the hobby. However, the regulation will apply to professional dog breeders.
Energy Conservation
The Government provide the Carbon Trust, a not-for-profit company, with funding of around £80 million each year to work closely with businesses, including retailers, to encourage more sustainable use of energy and help to establish more energy-efficient practices and systems.
The trust achieves this through the provision of free on-site energy-use assessments; identification of areas where savings could be made; and energy-saving recommendations.
A small fraction of retailers are participants in the voluntary climate change agreements, which offer a fiscal incentive for achievement of energy or carbon targets. The recent Energy Review identified significant potential for further cost-effective carbon savings from the non-energy intensive business and public sectors, which would include retailers. We will shortly consult on options to achieve these reductions, including a new mandatory emissions trading scheme, alongside other options.
The Department for Transport has the policy responsibility for street lighting, while the provision and maintenance of street lighting is the responsibility of highway authorities. All authorities should be seeking to reduce energy usage both to cut costs and to help combat climate change. As street lighting accounts for a significant proportion of the energy used by authorities, it should be readily identified as an area that should be examined for potential efficiency savings.
It is for the authorities themselves to make decisions on the type and level of lighting required, taking into account local circumstances and in accordance with their general responsibilities and duties. In many cases, it may be possible to reduce the intensity of street lighting and as a result reduce the amount of energy used. But this must not be to the extent that the lighting fails to perform as intended in aiding movement for all road users, reducing accidents and helping to create an environment that is pleasant and safe.
No revised estimates have been made.
Energy from Waste
Where waste cannot be recycled or composted, recovering energy from waste (EfW) is preferable to sending it to landfill. In 2004-05, energy was recovered from 9 per cent. of municipal waste in England, which is expected to increase to 25 per cent. by 2020. Increases in recycling and composting, as well as EfW will help the UK achieve its obligations under the EU Landfill Directive in diverting biodegradable municipal waste from landfill.
In addition, energy recovered from biodegradable waste can displace fossil fuel use in conventional power generation and is classed as renewable.
Electricity generated from waste combustion contributed about 6 per cent. of renewable electricity generation in the UK in 2005. While EfW is expected to increase, its contribution to future renewable energy generation will depend on waste composition, the pace at which new facilities are built and the types of technology used.
English Nature
I will place copies of this list in the House Library.
Environment Agency
The Secretary of State has not commissioned work to compare the costs of the Environment Agency (EA) with those of equivalent organisations in other European countries. The structures, remits and funding (through charging income or general taxation) of equivalent organisations in other countries differ so much as to make such a comparison uninformative.
The EA does liaise with the Scottish Environment Protection Agency to benchmark its charging schemes and, where a true comparison is possible, costs have been shown to be broadly comparable.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given on 9 October 2006, Official Report, columns 200-02W, which provided information on DEFRA funding to the Environment Agency for flood risk management from 1996-97 to 2005-06.
I hope to announce the allocation for 2007-08 before the end of this year. Funding for the years after that will be considered in the 2007 Comprehensive Spending Review.
Environmental Transformation Fund
The final details of the scale and scope of the joint DEFRA and Department for Trade and Industry Environmental Transformation Fund will be announced in the 2007 Spending Review, for implementation in 2008.
Fireworks
[holding answer 2 November 2006]: The Protection of Animals Act 1911 makes it an offence to infuriate or terrify any animal. Any person or organisation may initiate proceedings under this Act.
The courts alone must decide whether an offence has been committed. A review of the legislation governing the sale and use of fireworks was carried between 2001 and 2003, which included discussions between my Department and the Department of Trade and Industry. Following that review, the Government supported a Private Member’s Bill that introduced new regulations on the sale and use of fireworks—the Fireworks Act 2003.
Regulations were introduced in 2004, under the 2003 Act, to prohibit the use of fireworks after 11 pm (12 am on 5 November). They also ban the supply of excessively loud fireworks. These measures were partly brought in to protect animals.
Fisheries
At the beginning of each year, the United Kingdom receives a fixed percentage of the total allowable catch for each quota stock. Fisheries Administrations then calculate the UK quota which will be distributed to producer organisations and most other groups based on the aggregate of the fixed quota allocations (FQA) units held by members within each group. The membership of producer organisations mainly involves over 10 m vessels. Members of the under 10 m fleet, which fish against the under 10 m pool of quota, do not hold FQA units with their licences. Instead, units are held on a nominal “dummy” licence and the aggregate of these are used to calculate the opening allocation for these vessels. Some adjustments are then made to the quota which members might otherwise receive to boost their share of the UK quota for certain stocks before their opening quota is set.
On 1 September 2006, there were 5,977 fishing vessels registered and licensed in the United Kingdom (excluding Islands). Of these, 1,458 were over 10 m in length and 4,519 were 10 m or under in length.
Flood Relief
DEFRA funds most of the Environment Agency's flood-related work and grant aids individual capital improvement projects undertaken by local authorities and, in low-lying areas, internal drainage boards. The programme to manage risk is driven by these operating authorities; DEFRA does not build defences, nor direct the authorities on what specific projects to undertake.
The following table shows current allocations for 2006-07 compared to the beginning of the financial year:
Allocation at start of financial year Allocation now DEFRA grant to Environment Agency for capital spend 189.0 189.0 DEFRA grant to Environment Agency for revenue spend 239.0 224.1 DEFRA grant to local authorities and internal drainage boards for capital flood risk improvement projects 15.7 15.7 DEFRA grant to local authorities and internal drainage boards for capital coast protection improvement projects (which protect against coastal erosion but often also have significant benefits in terms of protection against flooding from the sea) 68.7 68.7
The only change has been a reduction of £14.9 million in grant for Environment Agency revenue spend. The Government also supports revenue spend by local authorities on flood risk management through revenue support grant, administered by the Department for Communities and Local Government.
Fox Hunting
The Forestry Commission allows drag hunting to take place in some areas formerly used for fox hunting. Their agreement with the Masters of Fox Hounds Association includes in the terms and conditions details of the scent that may be used. This has been revised for the current season by including the requirement for hunts to continue efforts to achieve successful hunting with chemical-only based scent.