Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 451: debated on Monday 6 November 2006

Written Answers toQuestions

Monday 6 November 2006

Public Accounts Commission

National Audit Office

28. To ask the Chairman of the Public Accounts Commission how much the National Audit Office spent on auditing government expenditure in Africa in the last year for which figures are available. (99173)

The information requested by my hon. Friend is not available. A number of Departments and other bodies spend government money in Africa. The National Audit Office record the cost of auditing the accounts of those bodies, and of the value for money studies they undertake, but no information is held on the cost of auditing the bodies’ activities in specific regions of the world. However, during the year to July 2006, as part of their audit of the main Departments involved in Africa, NAO staff visited Ghana, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Tunisia and Uganda to audit various UK government activities in those countries.

30. To ask the Chairman of the Public Accounts Commission what assessment the Commission has made of the effectiveness of the National Audit Office compared with similar bodies in the EU. (99175)

The Commission examines National Audit Office corporate plans, resource estimates and results on a regular basis. The Commission’s scrutiny programme includes examination of independent value for money reviews of the National Audit Office carried out by the office’s external auditors.

The external auditors have carried out some international comparisons as part of this work. The most recent comparisons were included in their report in 2004 on the effectiveness of the National Audit Office’s work in the context of achievements against the office’s target of securing for the taxpayer £8 savings for every £1 spent. The auditors concluded that the National Audit Office was more rigorous than any other similar organisation worldwide in the way in which it measured, recorded and reported the financial impact of its work.

The Commission continues to monitor the effectiveness of the office’s work on behalf of the House. Last week it carried out a further examination of the financial impacts achieved by the office and of its plans to increase the target to £9:1. I believe that the Comptroller and Auditor General and the National Audit Office provide an excellent service and excellent value for money for the House.

Leader of the House

Business of the House

To ask the Leader of the House which matters are required by convention or Government commitment to be debated each year; and what form of debate is required in each case. (98705)

The Standing Orders of the House require three days to be set aside for debates on estimates selected by the Liaison Committee and 20 days to be set aside for debates on matters selected by Opposition parties.

In addition to these commitments, there are a number of debates for which it is the practice to find time on the Floor of the House. These currently include two days ahead of European Council meetings, five days on different aspects of Defence, one day on Public Accounts Committee reports, one day on Welsh Affairs and one day on the annual report of the Intelligence and Security Committee.

The wider issue of the use of non-legislative Government time may be considered by the Select Committee on the Modernisation of the House of Commons in due course.

House of Lords Reform

To ask the Leader of the House whether the timetable for Lords reform set out in his speech of 24 October represents Government policy. (99202)

As I made clear in my speech, having been asked by the Prime Minister to take responsibility for this important policy, the timings I mentioned were those I hoped to see achieved. But whether these hopes are met depends on many factors.

State Opening

To ask the Leader of the House if he will place in the Library copies of the press briefing pack produced by his Office on the state opening of Parliament on forthcoming legislation; and if he will make a statement. (97918)

The Office of the Leader of the House of Commons does not produce a press briefing pack on the state opening of Parliament. The Downing street Press Office and individual Government Departments do issue press notices on the Queen's Speech. Copies will be placed in the Library. Further informationon the Bills contained within it is available on theOffice of the Leader of the House website at www.commonsleader.co.uk, following the state opening of Parliament.

House of Commons Commission

Green Cards

To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission how many green cards were completed on 1 November. (99912)

Pedestrian Access

To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission if the Commission will take steps to ensure that pedestrian access to the Palace of Westminster is not periodically impeded by inadequate rainwater drainage on St. Margaret's Street; what recent discussions he has had with Westminster City Council on this issue; what response was received; what representations he has received since July from (a) hon. Members, (b) Members of the House of Lords and (c) members of the public; and if he will make a statement. (99276)

Westminster city council has been contacted about drainage issues on St. Margaret's Street. The matter was referred via their highways defect reporting system and directly by letter. We await a response from Westminster City Council.

The Parliamentary Authorities are aware of the following representations on this issue:

(a) None from Members;

(b) One from Lord Monson;

(c) One from a member of the House staff.

Culture, Media and Sport

Tourism

8. To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if she will ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government that she rule out a bed tax as an option for local government finance. (99153)

The Government will not take any decisions on changes to local government finance until it has had the chance to consider the independent Lyons report which will be delivered to ministers in December 2006. DCMS Ministers will continue to represent tourism industry interests in this as in other cross-Government policy areas.

14. To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what assessment she has made of the implications for tourism of a bed tax; and if she will make a statement. (99159)

The Lyons Inquiry is an independent review, and it has not yet made any recommendations. DCMS Ministers will fully assess the potential impact of Sir Michael’s recommendations once he has made them, and will respond accordingly.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what estimate she has made of the number of rural tourism offices which have closed in the last 12 months. (99164)

There are around 500 Tourist Information Centres in England. Most of them are managed by local authorities as part of their discretionary support for tourism. We know of four in rural areas that have been closed and not replaced by any other provision in the last 12 months, and two new ones that have opened.

VisitBritain

9. To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what representations her Department has had on VisitBritain’s budget; and if she will make a statement. (99154)

Since 1997 funding for VisitBritain has risen from £44.7 million to £50.5 million for the current financial year. Detailed discussions are taking place to determine future budgets in the context of the CSR.

Royal Parks

10. To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what steps she is taking to ensure that encouraging greater use of the Royal Parks and holding more commercial events does not damage the fabric and character of the Parks. (99155)

The number and type of events is limited according to criteria set out in the agency’s Events Strategy, agreed with Ministers and their potential impact on the environment, on visitors and on local residents is carefully assessed before permission is granted.

Event organisers are required to take out a bond to fund any reinstatement necessary after an event.

Digital Switchover

11. To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what provisions have been made prior to digital switchover to ensure digital television coverage in (a) the Calder Valley and (b) other topographically challenging areas. (99156)

Ofcom estimated approximately 50 per cent. of households in the Calder Valley are currently able to receive DT services. Following switchover in the region DT capacity is intended to match current provision from analogue services.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what powers are available to her to regulate the production of regional news programmes by ITV after the switchover to digital television. (99157)

Regulation of regional news resides with OFCOM. This framework will remain in place after switchover.

Television Licensing

15. To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport when concessionary schemes for television licences are next expected to be reviewed. (99160)

The Government reviewed the concessionary arrangements as part of BBC Charter Review. The White Paper published in March this year proposed no changes to the existing range of concessions, because despite calls for concessions for many groups there was little consensus as to the criteria according to which they should be allocated. We have no plans for any further reviews of the concessions.

Decibel Penguin Prize

16. To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if she will make a statement on the future of the Decibel Penguin Prize. (99161)

The decibel Penguin Anthology aims to showcase the work of emerging writers from black and minority ethnic communities and it received £8,000 from Arts Council England. Penguin is printing 3,000 copies, which will be distributed to book shops across the country. I understand that Penguin and Arts Council England are considering plans for two further volumes.

Olympic Games

17. To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport by what means budgetary control is being maintained on the 2012 Olympic project. (99162)

I regret that it has not been possible to respond to the hon. Member in the time available before Dissolution.

18. To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what arrangement will be made for the funding of potential cost over-runs related to the 2012 Olympics. (99163)

Each annual budget will contain a contingency allowance from which cost over-runs will be met. As I said in the House on 6 November, in the event of further funds being needed to support the Olympic games, there is a formula in the M.O.U. to enable sharing between London and the lottery.

Tote

20. To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if she will make a statement on her plans for the future of the Tote. (99165)

My Department has been discussing over the summer a sale to a racing consortium at full market value, but has unfortunately been unable to reach an agreement. We will announce shortly how we intend to meet the intentions of the manifesto, which were to achieve value for money for the taxpayer and to recognise racing's interest in the Tote.

Abolition of Slavery Bicentenary

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what recent progress has been made in planning events for 2007 to commemorate the bicentenary of the abolition of the slave trade in the British Empire; and how much the Government has allocated to supporting such events. (98869)

I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Brent, South (Ms Butler) on 14 June 2006, Official Report, column 1222W. Since then English Heritage has announced its programme for 2007, which will include: researching for the first time connections between the transatlantic slave trade and properties in its care; and reviewing formal description of listed buildings to acknowledge historic links to transatlantic slavery and the abolitionist movement. In Scotland, the Scottish Executive are leading on plans for the bicentenary and they plan to devote a section of the One Scotland website to publicising bicentenary events.

To date, the Heritage Lottery Fund has awarded funding of over £20 million to 48 slavery-related projects. It’s new web-feature—http://www.hlf.org.uk/hlf/themes/index.html—provides advice on funding for community groups. Organisations which have recently received funding from HLF for 2007-related projects are:

Adeoti Arts and Crafts

Archbishop’s Council

Black British Heritage Ltd

Bread Youth Project

British Empire and Commonwealth Museum (BECM)

Childrens and Parents Alliance

Connections Northamptonshire and Northamptonshire CC Youth Involvement Team

Development Education in Dorset

Leeds West Indian Centre

Mary Seacole Trust

ODAC UK

SCAWADI Sparbrook Caribbean and African Women’s Development Initiative

Splendid Things

The Equiano Society

Theatre Royal, Plymouth

Tyne and Wear Museums

Charities

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what discussions she has had with the Charity Commission on the eligibility of sporting organisations for charitable status. (99158)

My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State has not had any discussions with the Charity Commission regarding the eligibility of sporting organisations for charitable status.

Gambling Act

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what estimate she has made of the (a) number and (b) proportion of problem gamblers who gamble largely online; and what assessment she has made of the effect of the implementation of the Gambling Act 2005 on those figures. (98339)

None. The remote gambling market was too small to be statistically significant when the first UK gambling prevalence study was conducted in 1999.

The Gambling Commission is currently conducting a new prevalence study and will report in September 2007.

Recent research by RSe Consulting, commissioned by my Department, has found that approximately 900,000 people in the UK regularly gamble by remote means. My Department’s own Taking Part survey suggests that nearly 5 per cent. of the population (in England) gambled online last year.

Sport England

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport whether she has plans to reform Sport England. (99073)

[holding answer 2 November 2006]: Sport England has undergone a sustained and substantial programme of reform which means it now has a clear focus on:

(i) boosting participation in sport; and

(ii) significantly improving the range and quality of facilities.

The performance of Sport England will be judged against success in these two areas.

Theatre

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how much her Department spent on support for (a) national, (b) regional and (c) local theatre in each of the last five years; and how much she estimates will be spent in each category in each of the next five years. (99579)

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport does not fund the arts directly, but through Arts Council England, which is responsible for supporting the arts with public money from Government.

The following figures provide a breakdown of Arts Council England grant in aid for regularly funded theatre.

£000

Arts Council England region

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

East

2,153

2,844

2,968

3,147

3,254

3,344

East Midlands

3,280

4,295

4,522

4,734

4,825

5,085

London

11,685

14,176

14,941

39,770

41,558

43,032

National1

34,095

36,668

39,235

1,045

1,086

1,117

North East

2,092

2,700

2,867

3,148

3,273

3,362

North West

5,619

7,159

7,377

8,159

8,455

8,805

South East

2,722

4,026

4,602

4,572

4,391

2,210

South West

2,680

4,432

4,557

5,200

5,252

5,396

West Midlands

3,101

4,103

4,307

18,373

18,878

19,397

Yorkshire

4,237

5,093

5,312

6,784

7,012

7,215

Total

71,664

85,496

90,688

94,932

97,984

98,963

1 National expenditure transferred to regional offices in 2005-06.

Within this funding Arts Council England classifies two theatre organisations as national companies.

£000

Royal National Theatre

Royal Shakespeare Company

2002-03

14,297

12,770

2003-04

14,810

13,270

2004-05

16,360

13,604

2005-06

17,261

14,000

2006-07

17,735

14,385

2007-08

18,223

14,780

Arts Council England does not categorise the remaining theatre organisations as “regional” or “local”, but as “producing” and “presenting”.

Support for organisations receiving regular funding from Arts Council England is set up to 2007-08. Future funding is contingent on the outcome of the current Government Comprehensive Spending Review.

Church Commissioners

Clergy Pensions

29. To ask the hon. Member for Middlesbrough, representing the Church Commissioners if he will make a statement on the adequacy of the pension funds available to the clergy. (99174)

The pension benefits currently available to Church of England clergy reflect steps taken in the 1980s to improve the package. The scheme provides a full service pension of two thirds of the national minimum stipend plus a lump sum of three times the pension. This year, that means a pension of £12,040 and a lump sum of £36,120.

Transport

Accessible Transport

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether he has plans to require car hiring firms to provide (a) wheelchair accessible vehicles and (b) vehicles that can transport electric wheelchairs. (98903)

[holding answer 2 November 2006]: There are no plans to require car hire firms to provide wheelchair accessible vehicles to carry a passenger who remains seated in their wheelchair. However, the effect of the Disability Discrimination (Transport Vehicles) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/3190), which come into force on 4 December 2006, is to apply the duties in section 21(2) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (duty of providers of services to make adjustments) to vehicle rental firms in respect of vehicles comprising of eight passenger seats or less.

This means that, from 4 December, firms who hire out such vehicles will be under a duty to take such steps as are reasonable to alter the physical features of those vehicles so as to provide facilities for the stowage of a wheelchair. It will be for vehicle rental firms to determine, within the reasonableness test, how and the extent to which this requirement should be met.

A statutory code of practice has been produced by the Disability Rights Commission to assist car hire firms and others to understand and implement the new duties.

Buses

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what steps he is taking to safeguard bus services in areas of low car ownership. (96195)

Local authorities already provide support for many bus services in areas of low car ownership. It is for individual local authorities to decide which services to support in their area. They should take account of accessibility planning when deciding their criteria for subsidised service support. The Department’s Guidance on Accessibility Planning specifically refers to the needs of those without access to a car as one of the factors to be taken into account.

Total local and central Government support for bus services is estimated to have been £1.8 billion in 2005-06, much of which will have been spent on safeguarding services.

We are currently taking a long, hard look at a whole range of bus issues to assess whether changes are necessary to improve delivery of our objectives, including those on accessibility and social inclusion.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on the future of the rural bus challenge. (98320)

The rural bus challenge was first introduced in 1998; five further annual competitions were held, the last being in 2003. A total of £110 million for 301 schemes was awarded to local authorities over that period.

There are currently no plans for further competitions under this scheme, which was aimed at developing and demonstrating the potential for innovative approaches to meeting rural transport needs. It was never intended to provide permanent revenue support for the projects supported. Information from local authorities shows that the scheme has encouraged the development of a large number of successful projects, many of which are now being continued with mainstream funding from local authorities, including funding from the Department's rural bus subsidy grant, or other sources.

Departmental Redundancies

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many redundancies there were in his Department in each year since 1997; what the cost of such redundancies was in each such year; how many temporary staff were employed in each such year; and how many staff were seconded by outside organisations to the Department in each such year. (95267)

The Department for Transport was created in May 2002.

There have not been any compulsory redundancies during that period. However there have been a small number of voluntary early redundancy/severance schemes.

Temporary staff are essentially used for short-term periods, usually to cover annual leave, sickness, or while managers are seeking a permanent replacement for a post.

The number of employed in the central Department for Transport, and its agencies since 2002 is as follows:

Number

2006

1,022

2005

1,468

2004

1,087

2003

1,210

2002

1,027

The numbers of inward secondments since 2002 are:

Number

2006

36

2005

49

2004

47

2003

15

2002

9

The Department is committed to trying to avoid compulsory redundancies and to use recruitment controls and voluntary means to achieve any essential reductions in staff numbers.

Through inward secondments, the Department believes that it benefits from the experience of a secondee (through specialist skills not available within the Department) by gaining a fresh perspective on the operation of its business, and establishing links with individuals who can be a useful source of advice to the Department in the future. It also benefits the secondee by providing them with an insight into the operation of government.

DVLA

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on progress in delivering the new rules governing the release of vehicle keeper information by the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority from the UK vehicle registers. (99701)

A statement on the progress of introducing the 14 new measures which I announced on 24 July will be made shortly.

Free Bus Passes

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many passes providing free bus travel for pensioners have been issued by each local authority in Hampshire including Southampton and Portsmouth since the scheme's inception. (97330)

This information is not held centrally, it can be obtained from the relevant local authorities.

Hand Luggage

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether (a) hair gel, (b) toothpastes, (c) lip balm, (d) water, (e) liquid cosmetics, (f) other liquids, (g) nail clippers, (h) lighters, (i) corkscrews and (j) other sharp items are permitted to be carried within the hand luggage of passengers on flights departing foreign airports for destinations within the UK. (95398)

[holding answer 19 October 2006]: International civil aviation security is framed by the principle of “host state responsibility”, whereby each state is responsible for the security of flights from its territory. It is for the relevant authority in each state to determine what items are prohibited at its airports from being carried in passengers' hand baggage. The International Civil Aviation Organisation offers advice to contracting states in this regard, and the UK and other states are working with ICAO to update that advice. Within the European Union there is a common list of prohibited items which applies at EU airports. This list, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/04/59&format=HTML&aged=0%3Cuage=EN&guiLanguage=en is presently being amended in light of the recent aviation security alert in the UK. It includes pointed or bladed articles capable of causing injury. ICAO's common list of prohibited items also includes pointed or bladed articles capable of causing injury.

IT Projects

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport which information technology projects are being undertaken by (a) his Department and (b) its agencies; what the (i) start date, (ii) original planned completion date, (iii) expected completion date, (iv) originally planned costs and (v) estimated costs are of each; and if he will make a statement. (95865)

The requested information could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. The following details relate to the DfT’s key IT projects that are monitored centrally.

Dept/ agency

Project name

Start date

Original planned completion date

Expected completion date

Originally planned costs

Estimated costs

Note ref.

DfT

Shared Services Programme

April 2005

April 2009

April 2009

31

45

1

VOSA

Roadside Digital Tachograph

January 2001

March 2005

March 2007

9.19

8.95

VOSA

Commercial Customer Portal

January 2004

December 2011

December 2011

9.5

21.72

2

VOSA

Operator Annual Test: E-Test Bookings

January 2004

December 2011

December 2011

8.4

11.97

3

VOSA

Mobile Compliance: providing mobile compliance devices to Enforcement Officers

March 2003

December 2004

March 2007

7.91

10.39

4, 5

DVLA

Driver Licensing: Drivers Re-engineering Project (DRP) phase 2

August 2003

September 2008

End 2008

1 09

102.9

6, 7

DVLA

Smart tachograph project

July 2000

May 2002

February 2007

13.2

14.72

DVLA

Vehicles System Software (VSS) Replatforming

January 2005

July 2006

June 2007

8.37

8.42

DVLA

Tracking Vehicles Through The Trade (TV3T)

August 2005

June 2008

October 2008

18.64

18.64

DVLA

Driver Licence Upgrade (DLUP)

July 2004

June 2007

March 2008

21.8

17.04

DSA

Integrated Register of Driver Trainers (IRDT)

October 2003

January 2006

February 2007

1.5

3.5

HA

Traffic Control Centre: PPP service; providing co-ordinated real time information on traffic conditions across most strategic road network

August 2001

August 2011

August 2011

1160

1160

HA

Electronic Service Delivery of Abnormal Loads (ESDAL)

April 2004

August 20062

August 20062

28.6

28.97

April 2004

July 20083

July 20093

31.21

31.21

1 Over 10 years.

2 Development.

3 Operation.

Notes explaining any variance in planned vs. expected data or divergence from information contained in PQ 2324 03/04:

1. The Shared Services programme is currently being replanned, so the estimated costs provided are likely to change in the near future.

2. The scope of the portal project has increased since original approval to include new elements such as the adoption of sophisticated data integration and management applications.

3. The scope of E-test bookings has increased since original approval to include a multi-channel solution.

4. The difference in completion date is due to an increase in project scope to include fixed penalties.

5. Original planned costs for Mobile Compliance did not include staff costs however, estimated costs to complete include staff costs from April 2005.

6. The previous PQ (2324 03/04) only relates to phase 1. The cost of £37 million with a delivery date of December 2005 was achieved within approved funding. These details have been updated to include phase 2.

7. The estimated completion date is currently subject to change pending a current re-scoping exercise.

Low Bridges

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many accidents involving buses striking low bridges occurred in the last three years for which figures are available. (97079)

The number of personal injury road accidents involving buses striking bridges that occurred in the last three years is given in the following table.

Number of personal injury road accidents involving a bus1 striking a bridge2: GB 2003-05

Accidents

Fatal

Serious

Slight

All

2003

0

3

8

11

2004

0

2

11

13

2005

1

2

10

13

1 Buses and coaches equipped to carry 17 or more passengers, regardless of use.

2 Includes accidents where the side or roof of the bus struck the bridge.

Ministerial Travel

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many journeys he has undertaken by (a) car, (b) train and (c) aeroplane in the last month. (95689)

All travel is conducted in accordance with the requirements of the ministerial code, Travel by Ministers and the Civil Service Management Code.

The Secretary of State for Transport made six journeys by air and eight journeys by rail in his official capacity between 18 September 2006 and 18 October 2006.

The Government Car and Despatch Agency (GCDA) is responsible for providing ministerial transport by car. GCDA does not keep a record of individual journeys nor details of passengers carried.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what steps he has taken to offset the carbon dioxide emissions caused by ministerial travel in his Department. (98767)

All central Government ministerial and official air travel is being offset from 1 April 2006. Departmental aviation emissions are calculated on an annual basis and subsequently offset through payments to a central fund. The fund purchases Certified Emissions Reductions credits from energy efficiency and renewable energy projects with sustainable development benefits, located in developing countries.

Carbon dioxide emissions arising from 32 (Royal) Squadron flights are included in the Government's carbon offsetting commitment. Carbon emissions arising from the use of these flights will be recorded and offset in the same way as the use of scheduled flights.

MOT

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether provision is made for the compensation of providers of motor vehicle maintenance services for (a) loss of earnings and (b) additional costs in circumstances of technical difficulties with the MOT IT system. (98938)

In the event of disruption to the MOT computerisation service, there are currently two business continuity procedures which are available to garages to ensure that they can continue to test vehicles. One militates against a failure of the local garage computer equipment whilst the other militates against a large scale database or telephone outage. There should therefore be very few circumstances under which garages incur either (a) loss of earnings or (b) additional costs as a result of technical difficulties with the MOT computerisation system. The Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) would, however, consider claims for compensation where a garage could demonstrate that it had suffered financially as a result of these business continuity procedures being unavailable.

Northern Ireland Airports

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 31 October 2006 to question 98374, on the security screening at Northern Ireland airports, whether members of the judiciary are included in the category of certain passengers. (99940)

The Chief Justice (or occupant of the highest judicial office in each country) is included in the category of passengers that are exempt from screening at UK airports. However, other members of the judiciary are not included.

Railways

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects to make a statement on (a) funding for and (b) the operational start of a re-developed Birmingham New Street Station. (98462)

Proposals (entitled the "Gateway" scheme) have been put forward by Birmingham city council and Network Rail for the substantial re-development of New Street Station. The business case for this scheme is currently being examined in depth by the Department, as a considerable sum of public funding is required for the purpose. I would anticipate being able to make an announcement during 2007.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many regional railway tsars have been appointed since 2004; how many are in post; and if he will make a statement. (99556)

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what recent discussions he has held with train leasing companies Angel Trains and Porterbrook; and if he will make a statement. (99066)

The Secretary of State for Transport has had no direct discussions with Angel Trains and Porterbrook recently. However, departmental officials have regular bi-laterals with the managing directors of both these companies and there is also engagement on a regular basis at a working level.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether he has ordered an inquiry into competition in train leasing. (99067)

On 28 June 2006 the Department for Transport initiated steps for a market investigation by asking the Office of Rail Regulation to refer the passenger rolling stock leasing market to the Competition Commission under Section 131 of the Enterprise Act 2002. The timetable set out by the Office of Rail Regulation is to publish their conclusions by the end of November 2006.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what estimate he has made of the (a) total premiums to be paid by train operating companies (TOCs) in each of the next 10 years and (b) total requirement for subsidy to those TOCs which do not pay a premium. (99102)

Payments to and premiums received from individual train operators in any given year (TOCs) are set out in table 4.2c of National Rail Trends, copies of which are in the Library of the House. Contracted subsidies and premiums to and from individual TOCs are published on the Department’s website when the relevant franchise is let. Actual payments and premiums in future years will depend on a number of factors including the operational performance of Network Rail and the TOC in question and the precise terms of the relevant franchise agreement. Where no franchise agreement is in place for the future years, premiums or subsidies will depend on the outcome of negotiations in the franchise specification and replacement process.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) whether revenue generated by the premiums paid by the franchised rail companies is included in his Department's future spending plans; (99103)

(2) whether revenue generated by Rail Franchise premiums is hypothecated for use by his Department (a) for any use and (b) on rail projects.

Forecast premiums from passenger franchises are included in the Department’s future spending plans. All premiums paid by franchises are appropriated in aid by the Department and the funds are made available for spending on transport.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what his policy is on the level of subsidy to be given to the rail industry during the next control period. (99130)

The Secretary of State will publish a high-level output specification (HLOS) in summer 2007. The HLOS will set out the Government’s spending and output priorities for the rail industry for the next control period and will inform the Office of Rail Regulation’s next review of access charges. The HLOS will include advice on the funds that the Secretary of State has available for spending on rail.

Roads

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer to question 98546, how many people were (a) killed and (b) injured by drivers who were using hand-held mobile phones in each year before 2005 for which figures are available. (99864)

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what estimate he has made of the net change in UK carbon dioxide emissions resulting from the road schemes approved through the targeted programme of improvements and local transport plans since 1998; (96813)

(2) what the estimated effect on annual carbon dioxide emissions is resulting from each road scheme approved by Ministers through the local transport plans since 1997.

The CO2 impacts of road schemes approved through the Targeted Programme of Improvements (TPI) and Local Transport Plans (LTPs) form part of the Department’s normal approval processes for major transport schemes.

The Department’s National Transport Model (NTM) has been used to estimate the CO2 impact of road improvements at a national level.

The road build included in our national modelling is the Highways Agency’s (HA) illustrative forward programme of schemes. This includes those schemes since 2000 in the TPI, plus an estimate of schemes that may make their way into the TPI going forward.

The modelling carried out for the Future of Transport White Paper included this HA illustrative programme, with it adding around 0.15 million tonnes of carbon in 2010, in England. The carbon added from just the current TPI would, therefore, be somewhat less than this, although that from local transport plans might increase it.

The TPI schemes were also appraised at an individual level. CO2 emission estimates for the HA’s motorway and trunk road schemes, in the TPI (which was first launched in 1998) are given where data is currently available. A copy of the table showing this information has been placed in the House of Commons Library. Schemes that have not yet entered into the TPI do not have this information as the proposals are still at an early stage.

The overall implications for CO2 emissions of LTPs, including roads, should be considered as part of their individual Strategic Environmental Assessments.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the latest cost estimates are for road schemes (a) in the targeted programme of improvements and (b) approved under (i) the local transport plans and (ii) community infrastructure fund. (96819)

For (a) Highways Agency schemes in the Targeted Programme of Improvements, I refer the hon. Member to the answer of 24 July 2006, Official Report, column 746W, to the hon. Member for Brent, South (Ms Butler).

I have placed information on (b), the latest cost estimates for road schemes approved under (i) the local transport plans and (ii) community infrastructure fund, in the Library of the House.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much has been spent on building new roads in each year since 1979. (98939)

I refer the hon. member to the written answers given on 17 October 2006, Official Report, columns 1137-38W, and 26 October 2006, Official Report, columns 2000-01W, to my hon. Friend the Member for Vale of Clwyd (Chris Ruane).

Those provided data on government and private funding for transport infrastructure in Great Britain. The expenditure for roads within the tables includes new construction, as well as patching works. The available expenditure data do not, however, identify new road construction as a separate category.

Seat Belts

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what (a) primary legislation and (b) statutory instruments regulate the wearing of (i) front and (ii) rear seat belts; what changes have been made to each since their enactment; what further amendments are planned; and if he will make a statement. (99273)

Sections 14 and 15 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 contain the primary legislation. Both were first amended by the Road Traffic Amendment Act 1988 (Amendment) Regulations 1992 (SI 1992/3105).

Section 15 was subsequently amended by section 83 of and schedule 8 to the Road Traffic Act 1991, which made a consequential deletion. Section 14 was amended by section 100 of the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003 in respect of the exception for delivery drivers.

The Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts) Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/176) and the Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts by Children in Front Seats) Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/31) contain the detailed regulations made under the 1988 Act. These regulations were amended by:

The Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts)(Amendment) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/27) in respect of the exemption for delivery drivers;

The Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (Consequential and Supplementary Amendments to Secondary Legislation) Order 2006 (SI 2006/594) in respect of an exemption for SOCA officers in the course of duty; and

The Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004 (Consequential Amendments) (England) Order 2004 (SI 2004/3168) in relation to England, and the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004 (Consequential Amendments) (Wales) Order 2005 (SI 2005/2929) in relation to Wales and the Fire (Scotland) Act 2005 (Consequential Modifications and Amendments) (No. 2) Order 2005 (SSI 2005/344), in respect of changing references in an exemption from “fire brigade” to “fire and rescue services”.

The 1988 Act and both sets of regulations made in 1993 were further amended by the Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts)(Amendment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1892) and the Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts by Children in Front Seats)(Amendment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/2213) in respect of changes required to implement the requirements of directive 2003/20/EC.

Further amendments are proposed to the regulations to require children aged three to 13 years to use seat belts in buses and coaches. This is a requirement of directive 2003/20/EC and is subject to further public consultation, which we hope to publish later this year.

Amendments are also required to the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986 (SI 1986/1078) as well as to the seat belt wearing regulations in relation to the requirement to use child restraints to the approved standards of UNECE Regulation 44/03 and directive 77/541/EEC and any subsequent adaptations. These are being prepared following consultation.

Transport Innovation Fund

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether the Government’s contribution to Crossrail will be funded from the Transport Innovation Fund. (99127)

I refer the hon. Member to the statement that the Secretary of State made on the Transport Innovation Fund on 27 June 2006, Official Report, column 6WS.

Vehicle Registration (Cambridgeshire)

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many cars are registered to keepers located in (a) Cambridgeshire, (b) South Cambridgeshire and (c) East Cambridgeshire; and how many were registered to keepers in each such category in each of the last 10 years. (99441)

The number of licensed cars registered to addresses in Cambridgeshire was as follows:

Number

1996

228,585

1997

238,813

1998

246,264

1999

259,804

2000

266,873

2001

274,011

2002

280,510

2003

284,805

2004

290,870

2005

296,688

Figures are as at 31 December in each year. Statistics for South Cambridgeshire and East Cambridgeshire are unavailable.

Solicitor-General

Departmental IT

To ask the Solicitor-General which of his Department's databases are (a) wholly and (b) partly operated by external organisations or individuals; and which organisations and individuals own those databases. (97777)

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has a 10-year public finance initiative partnership with LogicaCMG to modernise information technology in the service. The contract with LogicaCMG covers the provision and support of the hardware and software applications used by the CPS. These include: the CPS Case Management System; the Management Information System; the Witness Management System; and the Payroll, Human Resources and Corporate Information System. The CPS owns the data contained within the databases.

The Treasury Solicitors Department (TSol) has five databases, each of which is wholly owned and operated by external organisations or individuals. These are: the LION intranet database which is operated by SCISYS Ltd. and contains data owned by TSol which are updated interdepartmentally and managed by the Government Legal Service; the Penserver database, a pensions database containing data owned by TSol which is operated by Paymaster and operated on behalf of TSol and the Cabinet Office; the ePayfact database, a payroll database containing data owned by TSol and operated by LogicaCMG; the BV (Bona Vacantia) auction website database called URLS.co.uk which is operated by XM London, and contains data whichare owned and managed by BV and updated interdepartmentally.

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) operates three database systems. The Payroll system is provided externally by LogicaCMG on secure UK sites and contains data owned by the SFO. The SFO's evidence management system, Docman, is an internally operated system containing data owned by the SFO. It is maintained by SunGard Vivista; the SFO's IT services supplier.

HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI) interrogates and utilises databases operated by the Crown Prosecution Service and the Treasury Solicitor's Department, which are both supported by LogicaCMG.

To ask the Solicitor-General which databases operated by his Department are located (a) wholly and (b) partly outside the UK; and where each of those databases and parts of databases is located. (97778)

Diplomatic Immunity

To ask the Solicitor-General in how many cases prosecutions have not been proceeded with due to the claiming of diplomatic immunity by the potential defendant in the last five years, broken down by (a) country and (b) offences; and if he will make a statement. (97573)

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) holds no central record of the number of prosecutions which did not proceed owing to a claim of diplomatic immunity. The information is held on individual case files, and could be recovered only by examining every relevant file in each CPS office. This information can, therefore, be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Legal Costs

To ask the Solicitor-General if he will list the occasions over the last 10 years when the Government have decided not to claim after winning a court case against litigants seeking or obtaining judicial review of Government policy decision; whether the Government conceded the principle of not reclaiming such costs in advance of each court case being heard; and what criteria are used in deciding whether to pursue such costs. (99211)

This information is not held centrally. The information is held on individual case files, and could be recovered only by examining every relevant file. This information can, therefore, only be obtained at disproportionate cost.

Ministerial Travel

To ask the Solicitor-General what steps he has taken to offset the carbon dioxide emissions caused by ministerial travel in the Law Officers' Departments. (98746)

All central Government ministerial and official air travel is being offset from 1 April 2006. Departmental aviation emissions are calculated on an annual basis and subsequently offset through payments to a central fund. The fund purchases certified emissions reductions credits from energy efficiency and renewable energy projects with sustainable development benefits, located in developing countries.

Ministerial Visits

To ask the Solicitor-General on how many occasions he has visited (a) Wales and (b) Northern Ireland in the last 12 months. (95019)

Victim Compensation

To ask the Solicitor-General in what proportion of successfully prosecuted cases in Lancashire compensation for victims was (a) requested and (b) secured in the last period for which figures are available. (97444)

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) holds no central record of requests or awards for compensation. The information is held on individual case files, and could be obtained only by examining every relevant file in each CPS office. This information can, therefore, be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Aberdeen Angus Cattle

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what support his Department offers to farmers who breed Aberdeen Angus cattle. (98711)

There is no scheme of assistance designed specifically for farmers of Aberdeen Angus cattle. However, such farmers may be eligible for financial assistance under one of the DEFRA-run rural funding schemes. Further information is available on the DEFRA website at:

www.defra.gov.uk/funding/who/farm.htm.

Administration

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) how he measures the burden of administration in his Department; (99504)

(2) what estimate he has made of the administrative burden in his Department in each year since 1997; and what progress has been made towards the target of a reduction of 25 per cent. in the administrative burden.

DEFRA participated in the cross-Government administrative burden measurement exercise carried out by Price Waterhouse Coopers (PwC) on behalf of the Cabinet Office. The exercise used an internationally agreed model, recommended to the Government by business, to establish a baseline.

As the first UK Government to take this radical approach to managing the regulatory burden, there is no comparative data before 2005 when the PwC exercise was carried out. However, we will shortly be publishing a revised DEFRA Simplification Plan. Copies will be placed in the Library. The revised Plan will update action taken since the November 2005 Initial Simplification Plan “Lifting the Burden”. It will also take account of the outcome of the PwC measurement exercise and identify progress towards meeting DEFRA's commitment to reduce the overall administrative burden imposed on stakeholders by 25 per cent.

Age Discrimination

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if his Department will (a) carry out an age audit of its staff to establish an age profile of its work force, (b) negotiate an age management policy with trade unions and employees to eliminate age discrimination and retain older workers, (c) identify and support training needs and offer older staff flexible working to downshift towards retirement and (d) extend to over-50s the right to request to work flexibly and the right to training with paid time off; and if he will make a statement. (96493)

The information is as follows.

(i) Defra maintains an age profile of its work force.

(ii) The Department has reviewed its policies and will continue to review new policies to ensure they meet the requirements of the age legislation. The trade unions have been involved in this process and will continue to be involved.

(iii) and (iv) All employees regardless of age have responsibility for regularly reviewing their training needs with their managers. Attendance at training courses for work purposes is always paid.

All employees can request flexible working either for downshifting to retirement or for any other reason. Line managers have responsibility to ensure all such requests are fully considered and where flexible working is not agreed, to support their decision with robust and objective justification. This is in line with the “Delivering a Diverse Civil Service” initiative.

Agricultural Support

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much was spent on European support payments to farmers in each of the last five years. (98702)

[holding answer 2 November 2006]: The following table shows payments made through CAP schemes and Rural Development Programmes to farmers in the United Kingdom for the period 2001 to 2005 as recorded in the production and income account of the economic account for agriculture. They exclude payments made through the Over Thirty Month Scheme, compensation for losses due to animal disease and capital transfers. The proportion of EU funding for each scheme is shown in the right hand column.

Direct payments made through CAP schemes and rural development programmes to farmers in the United Kingdom1

£ million

Calendar years

2001

2002

2003

2004

20052

EU funding (percentage)

Crop subsidies

Arable Area payments (except set-aside)

827

875

924

901

0

100

Arable Area Payments on set-aside

180

143

177

129

100

Other crop subsidies3

3

2

3

12

11

100

Livestock subsidies

100

Beef Special Premium4

241

236

238

266

100

Suckler Cow Premium4

219

204

208

230

100

Slaughter Premium

76

133

136

156

100

Extensification Payment Scheme

118

137

145

154

100

Beef National Envelope

19

34

34

36

100

Scottish Beef Calf Scheme

20

100

Sheep Annual Premium

181

264

276

300

100

Sheep National Envelope

10

10

17

100

Dairy subsidies5

79

108

100

Single Payment Scheme

2375

100

Rural Development Programmes:

Less favoured areas support schemes6

165

165

163

153

144

Agri-environment schemes:

Countryside Stewardship and

Schemes that are part of Rural Development Programmes are partly EU funded. Funding may be up to 50 per cent. depending on the national contribution to the scheme7.

Arable Stewardship Schemes

43

59

71

104

114

7

Countryside Premium and Rural Stewardship Schemes

9

9

13

11

10

7

Tir Cymen and Tir Gofal

10

13

17

21

24

7

Countryside Management Scheme

1

3

3

6

3

7

Organic Aid and Organic Farming Schemes

18

22

21

14

10

7

Environmentally Sensitive Areas Scheme

70

73

81

82

79

7

Nitrate Sensitive Areas Scheme

2

2

7

Other8

3

3

4

3

3

7

1 Shows payments after deduction for modulation where appropriate.

2 Provisional.

3 CAP hops and herbage seeds support; hemp and flax aid; oilseed rape and linseed support; protein crop premium; area aid for nuts; energy crops aid.

4 Includes extensification premium and deseasonalisation premium.

5 Includes agri-monetary compensation; dairy premium and additional dairy premium.

6 Tir Mynydd in Wales, Less Favoured Area Compensatory Allowance Scheme in Northern Ireland, Less Favoured Areas Support Scheme in Scotland and Hill Farm Allowance in England.

7 As shown in the table.

8 Includes Moorland, Habitat and Countryside Access Farming schemes; Entry Level Pilot Scheme.

Animal Welfare

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what estimate he has made of the number of breeding sows farmed within farrowing crates in the UK; and if he will make a statement. (98211)

Approximately 65 per cent. of breeding pigs (290,000 sows and gilts) are kept in farrowing crates for part of the production cycle. There are strict time limits for the length of time that sows can be kept in farrowing crates. The farrowing crates protect piglets from crushing by the sow—one of the largest causes of pig mortality. We feel it is important to protect the welfare of the piglet as well as the sow.

We would, however, prefer to avoid close confinement of sows. DEFRA has funded research to investigate and develop viable farrowing systems that do not confine the sow, but provide adequate protection to piglets. Some such alternative systems seem promising in an experimental environment, but in others, piglet mortality has been unacceptably high. It remains the case that results need to be replicated consistently under commercial conditions. As yet, the risk of piglet mortality in alternative farrowing systems remains unacceptably high.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the merits of implementing a ban on the use of farrowing crates for pigs; and what discussions he has had with his EU counterparts on the merits of such a ban. (99035)

We would prefer to avoid the close confinement of all sows, but there are currently no free-farrowing systems suitable for widespread commercial adoption. Farrowing crates protect piglets from being crushed by the sow, one of the largest causes of pig mortality. The time limit on how long sows may be kept in farrowing crates is from seven days before the predicted day of farrowing until the piglets are weaned. After this period, sows must be moved back to loose housing accommodation in which they are free to turn round easily.

DEFRA has funded research to develop and test commercially viable farrowing systems which do not closely confine the sow but provide adequate protection to piglets. Some alternative systems seem promising in an experimental environment but it remains the case that results need to be replicated consistently under commercial conditions. As yet, the risk of piglet mortality in alternative farrowing systems remains unacceptably high.

Our research, and that of other European Union (EU) member states, will contribute to the European Food Safety Authority's examination of a number of issues, including farrowing systems. This work will lead to the next review of the EU Directive on pig welfare, scheduled for 2008. We look forward to working with other member states and the European Commission on this review.

Basking Sharks

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what estimate his Department has made of the number of basking sharks living in British territorial waters. (98576)

The population abundance and density of basking sharks in any sea area of the world is not known. Monitoring of the UK population of basking sharks has largely been based on sightings of sharks feeding on plankton near the sea surface during spring and summer. Three public sighting recording schemes are presently under way in the UK (The Marine Conservation Society Basking Shark Watch; Seaquest South-West and Solway Shark Watch). The MCS scheme has been running for 20 years and it has observed over 24,000 animals.

Current research (by the Marine Biological Association/Cefas) on basking sharks is using modern satellite telemetry to provide valuable information on movements and behaviour of basking sharks in the north-east Atlantic. Information uncovered to date on the geographical movement of individual sharks suggests that despite making long-distance movements they remain in the vicinity of the continental shelf around the UK, Ireland and northern France. These findings have been consolidated with sightings data from UK charities (MCS, IFAW, Shark Trust, Wildlife Trusts, Hebridean Whale and Dolphin Trust) as part of a three-year Esmee Fairbairn Foundation-funded grant to MBA. The project is bringing together in a single database all recent data on basking shark distribution and this means that it is now possible to undertake comprehensive analyses of trends.

Nevertheless, there is no current reliable population estimate for basking sharks in UK (or European) waters. This is due to the difficulties in relating surface sightings to actual population size. While the broad distribution patterns of basking sharks in UK waters are being uncovered by sightings data, new research using telemetry data suggests there are considerable differences in the density distributions of the animal, with animals 60 times more likely to be at the surface (and thus sighted) in mixed water fronts than stratified water fronts. Genetic research is also under way to determine whether populations of basking sharks are discrete or if there is population mixing between the north-east Atlantic region and elsewhere.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what plans he has to designate further areas for the protection of basking sharks; and if he will make a statement. (98577)

Basking sharks are protected in British territorial waters under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. This gives the shark protection out to 12 nautical miles.

It is difficult to designate specific areas for basking sharks given their mobility in UK waters. This would be more appropriate if we are able to identify areas which are key to these animals’ life cycle, such as, important feeding grounds or breeding grounds, or known mating areas that the animals consistently return to. At present, we do not know enough about these animals. A provision is currently being considered as part of the marine Bill to designate marine protected areas. This means that, as our scientific knowledge improves we will be able to adapt our approach to the conservation of this species, which may include the designation of marine protected areas if deemed appropriate.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what discussions he has had with the Scottish Executive on the subject of basking shark protection. (98578)

The Department is in regular contact with the Scottish Executive on a wide range of nature conservation issues, including discussions on basking sharks.

Biofuels

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what funding is available to farmers wishing to diversify into the production of biofuels and biomass crops; (98645)

(2) what steps he is taking to ensure that farmers are able to take full advantage of the potential of agriculture to produce (a) biofuels, (b) biomass and (c) other alternative sources of energy.

As part of our overall strategy for improving sustainability and reducing the impact of climate change, the Government support the use of biomass sources for the generation of heat and electricity. We are aware of the potential of biomass energy for agriculture and we are working closely with farmers and industry to develop markets and promote uptake.

DEFRA’s Energy Crops Scheme, part of the 2000-06 England Rural Development Programme, provides grants to farmers to establish short rotation coppice (SRC) and miscanthus. The scheme is now closed for applications. The Government have agreed in principle to support the establishment of energy crops under the new Rural Development Programme, which will run from 2007 to 2013, and are currently considering how best to take this forward.

The European Union’s annual €45 per hectare energy aid payment is available to farmers for purpose-grown energy crops grown on non set-aside land.

Farmers can also receive the single payment for purpose-grown energy crops on set-aside or where the European Union’s €45 per hectare energy aid payment is claimed for crops on non set-aside land.

Support for energy crops is provided by R and D funding from DEFRA. This underpins an expansion in the commercial breeding programme. The aim is to double the output of new varieties by developing crops with maximised yield and resistance to fungal diseases and pests. Studies are also looking at the development of non-pesticide control strategies and potential new energy crops such as switch grass and reed canary grass.

The Community Renewables Initiative aims to stimulate community-based partnerships in England to develop renewable energy, including biomass in their localities.

In 2004, the Government commissioned a Biomass Task Force, led by Sir Ben Gill, to identify the barriers to developing bio-energy and to recommend ways to overcome the problems. They published their report in October 2005. In April 2006, the Government published their response1 to the Task Force’s report. This response accepts that energy from crops, trees and waste can make a strong contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and sets out 12 key initiatives and over 60 associated actions to make this happen. A number of the initiatives have already begun, and we published initial information on these in April 2006.

1 www.defra.gov.uk/farm/acu/energy/biomass-taskforce

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps he is taking to ensure that farmers who wish to diversify into the production of biomass and biofuels are not hindered by a restrictive regulatory burden. (98648)

Under CAP Single Payment Scheme arrangements crops can be grown for energy use on set-aside land. An additional €45 per hectare payment can also be claimed if crops are grown for energy use on non set-aside land. There are specific requirements placed upon growers and processors of crops in these circumstances. The current regime is, however, subject to review and the UK, along with other member states, is working closely with the Commission to seek simplification of the relevant regulations.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what change there has been in levels of production of biomass crops in England since 2000. (98662)

The following table details the hectares of miscanthus and short rotation coppice established in England under the Energy Crops Scheme. The figures are cumulative. It also details the growth rate in establishment of these crops since the introduction of the scheme in 2000.

Energy crop

Hectares

Short rotation coppice

Miscanthus

Total established

Growth rate (percentage)

2002

298

52

350

50

2003

391

52

443

27

2004

498

354

852

92

2005

788

1,011

1,799

111

2006

1,180

3,356

4,536

152

2001

233

0

233

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the energy crops scheme; and if he will make a statement. (99224)

The objective of the energy crops scheme is to encourage the establishment of energy crops grown in England. Energy crops are carbon-neutral and, therefore, as a substitute for fossil fuels, can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The following table details the hectares of energy crops established in England under the energy crops scheme since its introduction in 2000.

Short rotation coppice

Miscanthus

Total

2001

233.2

0

233.2

2002

64.5

51.56

116.1

2003

93.71

0

93.71

2004

106.5

302

408.4

2005

290.1

657.9

948

2006

392.2

2,345

2,737

Total

1,180

3,356

4,537

Applications for planting in 2007 indicate a continuing increase in uptake. These figures show the energy crops scheme to be a viable and attractive option for farmers.

Birds and Habitats Directives

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will list the areas in (a) Gibraltar and (b) Cyprus sovereign base areas which meet the requirements for designation as (i) special protection areas and (ii) special areas of conservation under the EC Birds and Habitats Directives. (95233)

The areas which currently meet the requirements for designation as special protection areas (SPA) and special areas of conservation (SAC) in Gibraltar are the Rock of Gibraltar Site of Community Importance (SCI)1 and the Southern Waters of Gibraltar SCI.

There are also two potential SPAs2 in Gibraltar which are currently the subject of a consultation process.

British Sovereign Base Areas (SBAs) on Cyprus are not subject to “Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora” (the Habitats Directive) and Council Directive “79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds” (the Birds Directive). However, the Administration take environmental management issues seriously and have, for example, taken steps to designate the Akrotiri Salt Lake, the largest aquatic system in Cyprus, as a Wetland of International Importance under the Ramsar Convention.

Currently available information suggests that the following areas would qualify as SPAs and SACs:

i. Akrotiri Peninsula (SPA and SAC)

ii. Areas within the boundaries of Episkopi village including the Garrison Episkopi Forest and the coastline (SPA and SAC)

iii. Cape Pyla (SAC with some features that probably qualify as SPA)

iv. Akhna Dam (a very small part within the SBA as SPA).

1 Sites of Community Importance are candidate SACs which have been adopted by the European Commission.

2 Potential SPAs are sites which have received ministerial approval for consultation, the results of which will form the basis for final classification.

Bovine Tuberculosis

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when he expects to respond to the consultation on bovine TB. (98685)

We issued a News Release on 12 July drawing attention to the publication of the summary of responses and the report of Citizens' Panels held to consider badger culling as part of the consultation. The consultation was invaluable in helping us to hear from all sides of the badger culling debate and our aim is to take decisions that are sustainable and practical in the long term. There are no plans to issue an additional response to the consultation.

Both reports are available on the Defra website at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/badgers-tbcontrols/responses-summary.pdf and http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/badgers-tbcontrols/citizens-panels.pdf.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will undertake a review to evaluate the effectiveness of the pre-movement testing for bovine tuberculosis. (98729)

[holding answer 1 November 2006]: Monitoring the effectiveness of pre-movement testing is ongoing. Key statistics are updated monthly and published on the DEFRA website at:

http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/tb/premovement/monitoring-data.htm.

Chemical Sprays

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what measures are in place to protect (a) people and (b) the environment from agricultural chemical spray drift. (97848)

The approvals process for pesticides assesses the risk posed to people and the environment from pesticide spray drift. If the risk assessment is not satisfactory then that pesticide use would not be approved.

This rigorous risk assessment process is backed up by a code of practice for using plant protection products (pesticides) which includes a range of practical measures to avoid spray drift. These include using the right spraying techniques and equipment and taking account of weather conditions.

The code emphasises the need to protect members of the public, wildlife and the wider environment. It is the pesticide users’ responsibility to ensure that all reasonable precautions are taken to prevent spray drift. It is a legal requirement that pesticides must only be applied to the land, crop, structure or other area being treated.

Chlorofluorocarbons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what outstanding uses there are for chlorofluorocarbon gas in the UK under the terms of the Montreal protocol. (98678)

Under the Montreal Protocol, and EC Regulation 2037/2000 on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, the production and consumption of ozone depleting chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) is banned, except for essential uses in pharmaceutical metered dose inhalers agreed by Parties to the Protocol. Under the EC Regulation, there are exceptions for some military uses and some laboratory uses. As alternatives continue to become available, and military conversion programmes are completed, the need for CFCs in these applications will reduce.

Climate Change

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to his oral statement of 12 October 2006, Official Report, column 485, on climate change, what assessment he has made of the extent to which the film “An Inconvenient Truth” has raised awareness of climate change. (97507)

Al Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth” was released in the UK on 15 September 2006. According to the distributors, United International Pictures, the film has been seen by 125,000 people. By the time the film is released worldwide, the global audience will be around 5 million.

The film will be released as a DVD on 21 November 2006, with a potential worldwide audience of 10-20 million.

On July 27, the Secretary of State hosted an advanced viewing event of “An Inconvenient Truth” at Bafta in London. The 190 attendees included journalists, students, representatives from various local authorities, large membership organisations, representatives from the voluntary and community sectors, environmental groups and key individuals from executive agencies and funded bodies. Feedback suggested the film is likely to be highly effective in inspiring those who watch it to do more to tackle climate change.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what progress has been made towards meeting the Government's climate change targets. (98626)

The 2006 UK Climate Change Programme contains a package of measures and commitments that will help reduce the UK’s emissions of greenhouse gases to about 23.6 per cent. below base year levels and carbon dioxide emissions to 16.2 per cent. below 1990 levels by 2010. In addition, the recently published Energy Review set out ambitious proposals to get us on course to achieve real progress in emissions reductions by 2020 and put us on the right path to achieving our goal of 60 per cent. reduction in carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. The package will deliver between 19 to 25 million tonnes of carbon savings by 2020.

The UK is therefore on course to meet and go substantially beyond its Kyoto target of a reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases by 12.5 per cent. below 1990 levels by 2008-12.

The Government will be reporting on progress with these targets via an annual report to Parliament.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the effect of future immigration and population growth on the production of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the UK; and if he will make a statement. (99119)

UK greenhouse gas emissions projections take into account the latest population projections from the Office for National Statistics. DEFRA has not made any specific analysis of the impacts of immigration on greenhouse gas emissions.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs which local authorities were (a) successful and (b) unsuccessful in securing funding from his Climate Change Fund in the latest round; for which schemes funding was awarded; how much was awarded in each case; and when applications will be invited for the next round of bids. (98681)

The successful and unsuccessful bids from local authorities for funding from the Climate Change Fund are set out in the following table:

Successful local authorities

Local authority

2006-07

2007-08

Total

London

Royal borough of Kensington and Chelsea

18,450.00

3,550.00

22,000.00

London borough of Lewisham

74,950.00

30,150.00

105,100.00

Greater London authority

229,500.00

187,500.00

417,000.00

London borough of Bromley

30,000.00

30,000.00

London borough of Sutton

73,000.00

75,750.00

148,750.00

South East

Crawley borough council

124,747.00

125,949.00

250,696.00

South West

Somerset county council

124,900.00

113,600.00

238,500.00

West Midlands

Stoke on Trent city council

50,354.00

47,953.00

98,307.00

Shropshire county council

13,000.00

7,000.00

20,000.00

North East

Sunderland city council

20,500.00

15,000.00

35,500.00

Yorkshire and Humber

City of Bradford metropolitan district council

94,900.00

106,000.00

200,900.00

Kingston Upon Hull city council

42,689.00

68,728.00

111,417.00

East Midlands

Derby city council

50,000.00

51,480.00

101,480.00

Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire Local Authorities’ Energy Partnership

207,500.00

171,500.00

379,000.00

The Wellingborough Partnership

6,700.00

6,700.00

East of England

Ipswich borough council

44,098.00

44,098.00

Unsuccessful local authorities

London

London borough of Lewisham (2nd application)

London borough of Bexley

Royal borough of Kensington and Chelsea (2nd application)

London borough of Hillingdon

London borough of Ealing

London borough of Havering

South East

Chichester district council

Arun district council

Woking borough council

Bracknell Forest borough council

Elmbridge borough council

Royal borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

Hampshire county council

Basingstoke and Deane borough council

Slough borough council

Southampton city council

Eastbourne borough council

Lewes district council

Guildford borough council

Kent county council

Maidstone borough council

South West

Devon county council

Swindon borough council

Penwith district council

Teignbridge district council

Warwickshire county council

Redditch borough council

Malvern Hills district council

North West

Lancaster county council

Warrington borough council

Trafford metropolitan borough council

Carlisle city council

Manchester city council

Liverpool city council

North East

Scarborough borough council

Chester-le-Street district council (two applications)

Yorkshire and Humber

Selby district council

Rotherham metropolitan borough council

Kirklees metropolitan council

Wakefield district council

Harrogate borough council

Leeds city council

City of York council

North Yorkshire county council

East Riding of Yorkshire council

Scarborough borough council

East Midlands

Broxtowe borough council

Nottingham city council

East Midlands Regional Assembly

East of England

Breckland district council

Colchester borough council

Luton borough council

Essex county council

North Norfolk district council

Cambridgeshire county council

We are considering funding a second round of projects in 2007 to focus on changing people’s behaviour but a decision has not yet been taken. Any further rounds will be publicised and announced on our website, www. climatechallenge.gov.uk.

Consultants

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much his Department spent on consultancy fees in each year between 2001-02 and 2004-05. (94324)

The Department came into being in July 2001. The information held centrally is listed in the following table.

(£)

2002-03

15,317,093

2003-04

20,260,714

2004-05

78,671,992

Figures for the financial year 2004-05 include spending on management and business consultancy combined following reclassification of expenditure on professional services. Figures for previous financial years reflect expenditure on management consultancy alone.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much his Department has spent on management consultants in each of the last five years. (96163)

From data held centrally, the information is as listed:

Financial year

Value (£)

2002-03

15,317,093

2003-04

20,260,714

2004-05

78,671,992

2005-06

44,136,007

1 April 2006-27 September 2006

10,760,237

Figures for the financial years 2004-05 onward include spending on management and business consultancy combined following reclassification of expenditure on professional services. Figures for previous financial years reflect expenditure on management consultancy alone.

Cremation

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what steps he plans to take to tackle the effect on the environment of cremation; (99855)

(2) what assessment he has made of the effect on climate change of crematoria.

Crematoria are regulated by local authorities under the Pollution Prevention and Control Regulations 2000 (PPC). As such, they are subject to the provisions and limit values for all key emissions using the best available techniques (BAT). Statutory guidance on BAT is set out in DEFRA's Process Guidance Note PG5/2, which was reviewed and revised in 2004 and can be found at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/airquality/lapc/pgnotes/pdf/pg5-02.pdf.

Considerable improvements have already been made to crematoria emissions under the Environmental Protection Act 1990, which the PPC Regulations now replace. The latest guidance is aimed at reducing mercury emissions from all crematoria by 50 per cent. by the end of 2012, using an innovative burden sharing approach developed with the sector. I announced on 19 October, in a departmental press notice, our findings that the approach was proving successful, although we will be continuing to monitor the situation.

I am pleased to be able to announce that we will be issuing revised guidance to local authority regulators that we consider a lower temperature of 800oC, rather than 850oC, to be adequate to deal with emissions where crematoria are fitted with abatement equipment to achieve our required 50 per cent. reduction in mercury emissions. This will help reduce fuel usage and CO2 emissions. We will be discussing further with the cremation sector how to obtain evidence of whether any similar measures can be taken for crematoria not fitted with abatement, without compromising environmental protection.

The UK National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory does not report figures for any direct emissions of greenhouse gases from crematoria.

Departmental Dress Code

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what his Department’s policy is on the display of religious (a) artefacts, (b) symbols and (c) dress by its staff; how many staff have been subject to disciplinary proceedings regarding this policy in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. (95645)

The Department’s commitment not to discriminate unfairly on the grounds of religion or belief is set out clearly in its equal opportunities policy.

The Department does not have a formal policy on the display of religious artefacts, symbols and dress by its staff. There have not been any disciplinary proceedings in relation to religion.

Departmental Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much his Department has spent on organising and hosting conferences in the last 12 months. (93101)

DEFRA expenditure on conference organisation and sponsorship through DEFRA Communications Directorate plus centrally recorded spend from DEFRA's financial chart of accounts during the last 12 months was £3,562,246.04 This is comprised of:

Conference organisation sponsorship for Core DEFRA 12 Month spend: 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006

(£)

Non-Pay Operational Costs of Conference Provision (i.e. administrative costs excluding DEFRA staff salaries)

814,373.78

UK/EU presidency in 2005—Residual Payments

97,622.42

Communications Directorate Facility Managed Conferences

600,803.51

G8 and European Union Presidency

1,242,684.72

G8 and International Climate Change

806,761.61

Total

3,562,246.04

Note:These figures do not include costs incurred by any DEFRA Agency/NDPB, as this information could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what his Department has (a) planned to spend and (b) spent in each year since 1997; and if he will make a statement. (98628)

DEFRA’s final Departmental Expenditure Limit (DEL) Budget and final DEL outturn for each year since its creation are shown in the following table.

£000

Financial year

Final DEL budget

DEL outturn

2001-02

2,959,389

2,781,687

2002-03

2,469,291

2,320,880

2003-04

3,139,131

2,880,514

2004-05

3,480,986

3,317,788

2005-06

3,520,266

3,519,164

Note:

2005-06 figures are provisional

Departmental Staff

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many jobs his Department and its agencies had (a) in York and (b) at the Central Science Laboratory site at Sand Hutton in each year since 1992. (96613)

[holding answer 30 October 2006]: The information requested is as follows:

Core Defra staff at York site

Number

As at:

1 November 2004

367

1 April 2005

378

1 April 2006

403

PSD staff at York site

Number

As at:

1 November 2004

182

1 April 2005

198

1 April 2006

198

Staff in post at CSL site at Sand Hutton between 1996 and 2006

Number

1996

1

1997

431

1998

431

1999

443

2000

587

2001

592

2002

629

2003

656

2004

645

2005

660

2006

648

1 No data available.

The MHS employed the following numbers of staff at its headquarters in York:

Financial year

HQ staff

1995-96

39

1996-97

55

1997-98

73

1998-99

80

1999-2000

80

Note: Excludes individuals such as contractors who may have been working on site.

We are unable to provide data from 1994 (when the York site opened) up to 2003 as the work needed to provide this data would result in disproportionate costs.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many staff in his Department received bonus payments in each of the last five years for which information is available; what proportion of the total work force they represented; what the total amount of bonuses paid has been; what the largest single payment was in each year; and if he will make a statement. (98526)

The following table shows details of bonuses awarded to staff in DEFRA in each financial year since November 2004. Data prior to November 2004, is available only at disproportionate cost.

Period

Number of staff awarded bonuses

Proportion of work force (percentage)

Total amount of bonuses paid (£)

Highest bonus (£)

November 2004 to March 2005

1513

6.7

179,879

7,616

April 2005 to March 2006

23,535

44.9

3,364,032

34,040

April 2006 to October 2006

31,019

13.9

1,362,657

15,000

(November) 2006

4(1,680)

(23.1)

(2,933,611)

1 These figures represents in-year performance bonuses only, paid to staff at grade 6 or below.

2 This figure represents annual performance bonuses paid to staff in the SCS and at grade 6 and below. In addition it also includes in-year performance bonuses paid to staff at grade 6 and below.

3 This figure represents annual performance bonuses paid to staff in the SCS only and in-year performance bonuses paid to staff at grade 6 and below.

4 This figure includes annual performance bonuses about to be paid to staff at grade 6 and below in November salaries.

Separate performance bonus arrangements operate for staff in the SCS and those at Grade 6 and below.

For the SCS:

Non-consolidated cash payments, otherwise known as bonuses, reward in-year performances in relation to agreed objectives, or short term personal contribution to wider organisational objectives. Bonuses are paid in addition to base pay increases and do not count towards pension.

Bonuses are allocated by Departments from a “pot” expressed as a percentage of the SCS salary bill, which is agreed centrally each year following the SSRB recommendations. The intention is that bonus decisions should be differentiated in order to recognise the most significant deliverers of in-year performance.

For staff at grade 6 and below:

The High Performance Bonus Awards scheme introduced in April 2005, provide DEFRA staff with recognition and reward for delivery of an outstanding outcome or performance that significantly exceeds normal expectations. The process should provide staff at all grades with an opportunity to earn a bonus, and ensure that achievements in operational, policy and corporate services areas are recognised as being of equal esteem.

There are two types of award:

In-year high performance bonuses paid to individuals or teams in recognition of one-off achievements during the year; and

Annual high performance bonuses which are paid to the top 10 per cent. of performers in each DG for delivery of an outstanding outcome or performance sustained throughout the whole year.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much was paid to former departmental employees on gardening leave in each of the last five years. (99427)

“Gardening leave” is used very infrequently in exceptional circumstances and as a last resort; redeployment options and project work are always considered first. Decisions are taken at a business level and depend on circumstances and business need. Details, including costs, of such leave for former employees are not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Departmental Travel

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much has been spent by his Department on (a) chartering aircraft and (b) non-scheduled air travel in each of the last five years. (96219)

This question can be answered only at disproportionate cost. However, in respect of overseas travel by Cabinet Ministers, since 1999 the Government have published an annual list of all visits undertaken by Cabinet Ministers costing £500 or more during each financial year. Where non-scheduled aircraft are used this is shown in the list. Information for 2005-06 was published on 24 July 2006. Copies of the lists are available in the Library for the reference of Members. All Ministers’ travel is undertaken in accordance with the rules set out in the “Ministerial Code and Travel by Ministers”, copies of which are available in the Library for the reference of Members. All official travel is undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the “Civil Service Management Code”, a copy of which is also available in the Library for the reference of Members.

Departmental Vacancies

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what proportion of vacancies in his Department in the last 12 months required candidates to have at least a grade C in (a) English and (b) mathematics GCSE. (96750)

DEFRA operates a competence-based recruitment system. GCSE English and/or maths are not specifically required because relevant experience can be used to support an application rather than educational qualifications.

Desmoulins Whorl Snails

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what assessment he has made of the state of the Desmoulins Whorl snail population in sites of special scientific interest in the UK; (99489)

(2) what estimate he has made of Desmoulins Whorl snail populations at sites of special scientific interest in each year to 2010; and if he will make a statement;

(3) what representations he has received on the effect on the Desmoulins Whorl snail population of the completion of the A34 Newbury bypass;

(4) what the Desmoulins Whorl snail population was in the sites of special scientific interest at (a) Rack Marsh, (b) Boxford, (c) Hunts Green and (d) Bagnor Island in each year since 1997; and if he will make a statement.

Since the public inquiry over the A34 Newbury bypass, knowledge of the Desmoulins Whorl snail distribution, ecology and conservation status has improved considerably. This has been achieved both through research and surveys (contracted by the former English Nature) and work undertaken by members of the Conchological Society of Great Britain and Ireland, including work undertaken in Europe.

The species is much more widespread in the UK than it was formerly thought to be and has been found in new areas of some other European countries. This is likely to be a result of under-recording in the past rather than an increase in its population. It is also less fastidious in its habitat requirements and less restricted to riparian areas than was previously thought.

Its populations fluctuate considerably at individual sites, depending on the wetness of the season and, consequently, its numbers on some parts of some sites of special scientific interest (SSSIs) have been reduced in recent drought years.

Rack Marsh, Hunts Green and Bagnor Island all form part of the Kennet and Lambourn SSSI and Boxford Watermeadow is a separate SSSI. Both sites are assessed as being in favourable condition. Whilst there have been population fluctuations of the snail, including absence on some of the drier areas, healthy populations remain elsewhere in the Kennet and Lambourn confluence floodplain both inside and outside the SSSIs.

This variation is to be expected, given the species' response to the humidity of its environment. Precise numbers are not recorded each year as this would be highly resource-intensive and unlikely to give meaningful results. However the Environment Agency and the Department for Transport have undertaken monitoring in a number of areas in the Kennet and Lambourn confluence floodplain.

This Department has not received any representations concerning the Desmoulins Whorl snail following the completion of the A34 Newbury bypass.

Dogs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will take further steps to regulate dog ownership through licensing. (99839)

We currently have no plans to re-introduce a dog licence. The Government support the approach taken by responsible dog owners who voluntarily have their pets permanently identified and registered on nationwide databases. The effectiveness of a dog licensing system is questionable; in the last year licences were administered (1988) only 44 per cent. of dog owners applied for a licence.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the potential impact of EC Council Regulations 1/2005 on (a) exhibitors and visitors to dog shows and trials and (b) dog breeders; and if he will make a statement. (98187)

The EC Council Regulations 1/2005 will apply to the transport of animals in connection with an “economic activity”. The winning of prizes at shows and trials should not be regarded as making the transport of dogs to them commercial. However, the regulation will apply to the transport of dogs to shows and trials in connection with an economic activity, for example, that of professional dog breeders.

Those who breed dogs as a hobby will be excluded from the scope of the regulations providing that their income source does not exceed the expenses of the hobby. However, the regulation will apply to professional dog breeders.

Energy Conservation

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps he is taking to encourage retailers to reduce unnecessary energy use. (99541)

The Government provide the Carbon Trust, a not-for-profit company, with funding of around £80 million each year to work closely with businesses, including retailers, to encourage more sustainable use of energy and help to establish more energy-efficient practices and systems.

The trust achieves this through the provision of free on-site energy-use assessments; identification of areas where savings could be made; and energy-saving recommendations.

A small fraction of retailers are participants in the voluntary climate change agreements, which offer a fiscal incentive for achievement of energy or carbon targets. The recent Energy Review identified significant potential for further cost-effective carbon savings from the non-energy intensive business and public sectors, which would include retailers. We will shortly consult on options to achieve these reductions, including a new mandatory emissions trading scheme, alongside other options.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps his Department is taking to encourage a reduction in energy usage in street lighting. (99610)

The Department for Transport has the policy responsibility for street lighting, while the provision and maintenance of street lighting is the responsibility of highway authorities. All authorities should be seeking to reduce energy usage both to cut costs and to help combat climate change. As street lighting accounts for a significant proportion of the energy used by authorities, it should be readily identified as an area that should be examined for potential efficiency savings.

It is for the authorities themselves to make decisions on the type and level of lighting required, taking into account local circumstances and in accordance with their general responsibilities and duties. In many cases, it may be possible to reduce the intensity of street lighting and as a result reduce the amount of energy used. But this must not be to the extent that the lighting fails to perform as intended in aiding movement for all road users, reducing accidents and helping to create an environment that is pleasant and safe.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer of 30 November 2005, Official Report, column 507W, on energy efficiency, whether his Department has revised its estimates of the cost-effective potential for carbon savings in the commercial and public services sector through energy efficiency measures by 2010 and 2020. (99805)

Energy from Waste

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the effect of a substantial increase in the use of energy from waste on progress towards UK targets on (a) renewable energy and (b) waste management. (96292)

Where waste cannot be recycled or composted, recovering energy from waste (EfW) is preferable to sending it to landfill. In 2004-05, energy was recovered from 9 per cent. of municipal waste in England, which is expected to increase to 25 per cent. by 2020. Increases in recycling and composting, as well as EfW will help the UK achieve its obligations under the EU Landfill Directive in diverting biodegradable municipal waste from landfill.

In addition, energy recovered from biodegradable waste can displace fossil fuel use in conventional power generation and is classed as renewable.

Electricity generated from waste combustion contributed about 6 per cent. of renewable electricity generation in the UK in 2005. While EfW is expected to increase, its contribution to future renewable energy generation will depend on waste composition, the pace at which new facilities are built and the types of technology used.

English Nature

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what contracts were entered into by English Nature with environmental organisations in (a) 2003-04, (b) 2004-05 and (c) 2005-06, broken down by (i) length and (ii) value. (97817)

Environment Agency

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether he has commissioned work to compare the costs of the Environment Agency with those of equivalent organisations in other European countries. (98239)

The Secretary of State has not commissioned work to compare the costs of the Environment Agency (EA) with those of equivalent organisations in other European countries. The structures, remits and funding (through charging income or general taxation) of equivalent organisations in other countries differ so much as to make such a comparison uninformative.

The EA does liaise with the Scottish Environment Protection Agency to benchmark its charging schemes and, where a true comparison is possible, costs have been shown to be broadly comparable.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much was allocated in grant-in-aid to the Environment Agency for flood risk management in each year since 1997-98; and how much he expects to allocate in each year up to 2009-10. (99228)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given on 9 October 2006, Official Report, columns 200-02W, which provided information on DEFRA funding to the Environment Agency for flood risk management from 1996-97 to 2005-06.

I hope to announce the allocation for 2007-08 before the end of this year. Funding for the years after that will be considered in the 2007 Comprehensive Spending Review.

Environmental Transformation Fund

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the proposed roles are of (a) his Department and (b) the Department of Trade and Industry in relation tothe Environmental Transformation Fund; and what the timescale is for the implementation of the proposals for the fund. (98517)

The final details of the scale and scope of the joint DEFRA and Department for Trade and Industry Environmental Transformation Fund will be announced in the 2007 Spending Review, for implementation in 2008.

Fireworks

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what discussions his Department has held with the Department of Trade and Industry on the animal welfare implications of restrictions on the retail sale of fireworks. (98892)

[holding answer 2 November 2006]: The Protection of Animals Act 1911 makes it an offence to infuriate or terrify any animal. Any person or organisation may initiate proceedings under this Act.

The courts alone must decide whether an offence has been committed. A review of the legislation governing the sale and use of fireworks was carried between 2001 and 2003, which included discussions between my Department and the Department of Trade and Industry. Following that review, the Government supported a Private Member’s Bill that introduced new regulations on the sale and use of fireworks—the Fireworks Act 2003.

Regulations were introduced in 2004, under the 2003 Act, to prohibit the use of fireworks after 11 pm (12 am on 5 November). They also ban the supply of excessively loud fireworks. These measures were partly brought in to protect animals.

Fisheries

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how the British quota for white fish is allocated across the (a) over 10 m and (b) under 10 m sectors of the British fishing industry in England. (98107)

At the beginning of each year, the United Kingdom receives a fixed percentage of the total allowable catch for each quota stock. Fisheries Administrations then calculate the UK quota which will be distributed to producer organisations and most other groups based on the aggregate of the fixed quota allocations (FQA) units held by members within each group. The membership of producer organisations mainly involves over 10 m vessels. Members of the under 10 m fleet, which fish against the under 10 m pool of quota, do not hold FQA units with their licences. Instead, units are held on a nominal “dummy” licence and the aggregate of these are used to calculate the opening allocation for these vessels. Some adjustments are then made to the quota which members might otherwise receive to boost their share of the UK quota for certain stocks before their opening quota is set.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many fishing vessels are registered in the UK fishing industry; and what estimated number is in the (a) over 10 m and (b) under 10 m sector. (98142)

On 1 September 2006, there were 5,977 fishing vessels registered and licensed in the United Kingdom (excluding Islands). Of these, 1,458 were over 10 m in length and 4,519 were 10 m or under in length.

Flood Relief

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much (a) capital and (b) revenue funding was allocated to flood relief for financial year 2006-07; and what changes have been made to these allocations in the last six months. (96073)

DEFRA funds most of the Environment Agency's flood-related work and grant aids individual capital improvement projects undertaken by local authorities and, in low-lying areas, internal drainage boards. The programme to manage risk is driven by these operating authorities; DEFRA does not build defences, nor direct the authorities on what specific projects to undertake.

The following table shows current allocations for 2006-07 compared to the beginning of the financial year:

£ million

Allocation at start of financial year

Allocation now

DEFRA grant to Environment Agency for capital spend

189.0

189.0

DEFRA grant to Environment Agency for revenue spend

239.0

224.1

DEFRA grant to local authorities and internal drainage boards for capital flood risk improvement projects

15.7

15.7

DEFRA grant to local authorities and internal drainage boards for capital coast protection improvement projects (which protect against coastal erosion but often also have significant benefits in terms of protection against flooding from the sea)

68.7

68.7

The only change has been a reduction of £14.9 million in grant for Environment Agency revenue spend. The Government also supports revenue spend by local authorities on flood risk management through revenue support grant, administered by the Department for Communities and Local Government.

Fox Hunting

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps the Forestry Commission has taken to encourage former fox hunts to switch to the use of artificial scents when drag hunting on Forestry Commission land. (98086)

The Forestry Commission allows drag hunting to take place in some areas formerly used for fox hunting. Their agreement with the Masters of Fox Hounds Association includes in the terms and conditions details of the scent that may be used. This has been revised for the current season by including the requirement for hunts to continue efforts to achieve successful hunting with chemical-only based scent.

GM Crops

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) when he expects to make available the responses to the recent consultation on GM co-existence; and if he will place them on the Department’s website; (99229)

(2) when he is expected to bring forward a draft statutory instrument on co-existence of GM crops with other crops;

(3) when the results of the recent consultation on co-existence between genetically modified and non-genetically modified crops will be announced; and how many correspondents were (a) in favour, (b) against and (c) neutral on the proposals.

We have received several thousand responses to the consultation on proposals for managing the co-existence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in England. We do not intend to put individual responses on our website, but we will publish a summary of the responses as soon as possible. Copies of the responses will be publicly available through the DEFRA Library. In due course we will indicate how we intend to proceed having weighed up all the comments. It is too early to say when we might bring forward draft co-existence regulations, although it remains our objective to have co-existence measures in place before there is any commercial GM cultivation.

GM Labelling

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what factors underlay his Department's decision to set genetically modified (GM) contamination levels at 0.9 per cent. in foods before GM labelling is required. (99026)

In 2003, the Member States of the European Union (EU) decided collectively that crops or food ingredients should be exempted from carrying a genetically modified (GM) label if they have an adventitious, or technically unavoidable presence of an approved GM organism below 0.9 per cent. This is specified in EU law.

Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Permits

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will take steps to reduce the (a) length and (b) complexity of the registration application for the integrated pollution prevention and control permit by the Environment Agency. (98761)

The Environmental Permitting Programme, launched by DEFRA in partnership with the Environment Agency and Welsh Assembly Government, seeks to combine the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) and waste management licensing systems into a common permitting and compliance system.

The proposed integrated permit, planned for implementation in 2008, is set out in the second of two consultations. This aims to streamline and simplify the mechanics of the permitting and compliance systems for waste and IPPC. The new system, consisting of fewer, simpler rules and clearer guidance, would result in a more unified approach allowing industry, regulators and the public to focus more on environmental outcomes and less on how they are achieved.

More information is available at www.defra.gov.uk/environment/epp.

International GCSE

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether his Department recognises the International GCSE as an acceptable substitute for a GCSE for the purposes of recruitment. (96725)

This qualification is not recognised by DEFRA as it is neither part of the National Qualification Framework or regulated by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. DEFRA operates a competence-based recruitment system and would require applicants who hold this qualification to also provide evidence of relevant experience in support of their application.

International Whaling Commission

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps he has taken to encourage EU members that are not signatories of the International Whaling Commission to sign. (98720)

I have recently written again to the Environment Ministers of all European Union (EU) member states that are not currently members of the International Whaling Commission (IWC), and to those seeking accession to the EU, to encourage support for the IWC moratorium on commercial whaling, and for the United Kingdom’s policies on whaling. Furthermore, I also raised the issue of IWC membership at the recent Environment Council meeting in Luxembourg.

DEFRA officials also ensure that Foreign and Commonwealth Office posts in the relevant capitals are briefed, and engage in discussion with their counterparts on whaling at every appropriate opportunity. This ensures that these countries are in no doubt of the importance that the UK places on whale conservation.

We shall continue to encourage more conservation- minded countries to join the IWC as soon as possible, in order to reverse the pro-whaling majority.

The UK and its allies have taken every opportunity to try to persuade new anti-whaling countries to join the IWC, with some success: six have joined in the last two years.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what discussions his Department has had with the Cypriot Government on Cyprus joining the International Whaling Commission. (99583)

I have written to the Cypriot Government, and to all the other member states of the European Union that are not yet members of the International Whaling Commission (IWC), urging them to join the IWC, stressing the importance of their membership.

I am pleased to say that I received a reply from my counterpart in Cyprus. He has assured me of Cyprus' commitment to conservation issues and that the Cypriot Government is looking to join the IWC in the near future. The British Embassy in Nicosia is fully engaged in supporting the Cypriot Government in this step.

Light Bulbs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what proportion of light bulbs purchased by his Department in 2005 were of the compact fluorescent type. (98251)

Live Animal Exports

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many live adult cattle have been exported for (a) breeding, (b) further fattening and (c) slaughter since 1 May 2006; and how many in each category were exported to each country of destination. (99745)

It is not currently possible to obtain reliable information from the EU-wide system for export certification (TRACES).

However, the GB Cattle Tracing System (CTS) is updated as and when cattle are exported. The CTS shows that 14,352 cattle of 42 days of age and older were exported to mainland Europe in the period from1 May 2006 to 11 October 2006. The CTS does not indicate whether the animals were intended for breeding, production or slaughter. The cattle were exported to the following countries: Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, France, Italy, Republic of Ireland, Germany, Hungary, Estonia, Poland, Denmark, Romania and Switzerland. A breakdown of how many cattle were exported to each of these countries is not available.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer of 23 October 2006, Official Report, column 1593W, on animal exports, what the total journey time was from the place of departure to the final destination of each of the consignments of calves exported from Dover on 11 October 2006. (99746)

Ten of the 14 route plans have so far been returned. The time taken to the nearest hour to get from the export premises to the places of destination including rest breaks during the journey are recorded as:

Destination country

Duration (hours)

Belgium

21

Spain

65

Belgium

55

Belgium

56

Belgium

56

Belgium

56

Belgium

58

Belgium

59

Spain

68

France

30

Lyme Bay (Scallop Dredging)

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will place in the Library copies of (a) written submissions and (b) notes of oral submissions related to the Department’s decision in the case of Lyme Bay scallop dredging. (98627)

I have arranged for summaries of submissions made to me, and released to Devon Wildlife Trust and interested parties under the Environment Information Regulations (S.I. 2004/3391), to be placed in the Library of the House.

Ministerial Speech

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much it cost (a) to publish in booklet form and (b) to distribute his speech to the Royal Show on 3 July. (99432)

David Miliband's speech, “One Planet Farming—Towards a shared agenda for the future of farming”, was not actually published in booklet form until after the Royal Show. The cost of the typesetting and printing of the document was £10,490 excluding VAT. It was sent to 53,000 farmers with the British Farmer and Grower publication by the NFU, at no additional cost to DEFRA.

Muslim Council of Britain

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much (a) financial support and (b) support in kind his Department and its agencies have given to the Muslim Council of Britain in each year since 1997. (96276)

The Department and its agencies can confirm that (a) no financial support has been given to the Muslim Council of Britain since 1997 and that similarly (b) no support in kind has been provided.

Natural England

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what contracts Natural England has entered into with environmental organisations since its inception, broken down by (a) length and (b) value of contract. (97818)

Nirex

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what discussions he has had with the Nirex work force regarding his proposals to merge Nirex into the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority. (98104)

The Secretary of State made clear in his parliamentary statement and his open letter to the Nirex Chair that we are determined to harness the skill and commitment of the Nirex work force within the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority. The Nirex Board is being consulted about the proposed share sale. We are committed to ensuring that Nirex staff will be fairly treated.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many meetings his Department's (a) Ministers and (b) officials have had with representatives of (i) Nirex, (ii) the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority and (iii) Sovereign Strategy in the last 24 months. (98140)

On 1 April 2005, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) was established under the Energy Act 2004 and United Kingdom Nirex Ltd. was brought under Government ownership.

Since that time, according to departmental records, DEFRA Ministers have had meetings with representatives of Nirex on two occasions and with representatives of the NDA on one occasion. DEFRA officials have had meetings with representatives of Nirex on at least 21 occasions and with the NDA on at least 14 occasions. There have been no meetings between DEFRA Ministers, or DEFRA officials, and representatives of Sovereign Strategy.

DEFRA officials have also been at meetings and workshops with more general attendance at which representatives of Nirex or the NDA have been present.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer of 30 October 2006, Official Report, column 273W, on Nirex, if he will consult the Sustainable Development Commission on his plans to merge Nirex into the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority. (99456)

Ministers and officials meet the Sustainable Development Commission regularly, and there is opportunity to raise any matters in which they have an interest.

Nuclear Waste

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will take steps to minimise the movement between licensed nuclear sites of conditioned radioactive waste. (98870)

There are various factors (such as social impacts, technical issues, protection of the environment, land use, transport, availability of radioactive waste treatment and disposal facilities and economic factors) that may need to be considered in any future decision about moving conditioned radioactive wastes between licensed nuclear sites. The desire to avoid excessive transportation of materials is an important consideration but must be balanced with all other relevant factors on a case-by-case basis.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what investigations into the suitability of the soil strata for low or high-level nuclear waste have been made in West Yorkshire. (99421)

I am not aware of any specific investigations of the suitability of soil strata or underlying rocks in West Yorkshire for land-based radioactive waste disposal facilities.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what process he plans to adopt to assess the likely cost of (a) interim storage and (b) long-term disposal of intermediate and high level radioactive waste. (98195)

The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority’s (NDA) site licensee companies already have costed plans for the interim storage of waste included in their site lifetime plans. Several stores are already in operation.

We accept the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management’s (CoRWM) recommendation that the process for developing a geological disposal option should be undertaken on a staged basis, with clear decision points. That will allow the Government to review progress and to assess costs, value for money and environmental impact before decisions are taken to move to the next stage.

Final disposal costs will depend on the site and the concept agreed. This is a major investment which will be incurred over a period of many years to ensure long-term public and environmental safety.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether he plans to increase resources available to the Environment Agency to use for work on radioactive waste regulation. (98198)

The Environment Agency (EA) recovers the costs of its statutory regulatory activities directly from nuclear site licensees and from non-nuclear users of radioactive materials, through statutory charging schemes. Through the Health and Safety Executive, from nuclear site licensees, and currently through an agreement with Nirex, the EA has other cost recovery routes for its assessment work relating to nuclear waste conditioning and eventual disposal.

The EA and the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) are jointly considering how the NDA may fund an increasing level of work that the agency plans to undertake during the coming years, in accordance with the Government’s Managing Radioactive Waste Safely implementation programme.

These funding routes, together with the continued provision of grant in aid, should provide the EA with the necessary resources for effective radioactive waste regulation.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will assess the merits of making funding available to support the expenses of public and stakeholder engagement on the detail of implementation of geological disposal of radioactive waste. (98201)

In developing the implementation framework for the geological disposal of higher-activity radioactive waste, the Government will consider the provision of any engagement and community packages as proposed by the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM). The implementation framework will be subject to public consultation next year.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether radioactive waste from private nuclear operators including British Energy will become part of the proposed inventory of nuclear waste to be placed in the geological repository. (98204)

The Government have accepted the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management's (CoRWM) recommendation for geological disposal as the best technical option for the long-term management of the United Kingdom's higher-activity radioactive waste. The inventory of materials for disposal in any given facility will need to be clearly defined before agreements with potential host communities can be finalised and before technical options are developed in depth.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to his Oral Statement of 25 October 2006, Official Report, columns 1519-34, on the radioactive waste management report, how many jobs will be transferred from Nirex to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority; where they will be located; and what estimate he has made of the (a) one-off and (b) ongoing cost savings which will result from the transfer. (98545)

Nirex has key skills and expertise that we shall be safeguarding, as these are of utmost importance to the programme of work to secure geological disposal. It is anticipated that the staff of Nirex will transfer to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) on terms at least as favourable as those they currently enjoy. The NDA will consult with staff to explore their options and preferences as part of the integration process.

For the foreseeable future, Nirex staff will remain at Harwell. Under the proposed transfer, this would, however, be a matter for the NDA, and would be the subject of discussions with individual staff. There are no plans for relocation.

Although currently owned by DEFRA and Department of Trade and Industry, the majority of Nirex's funding comes from the contract they retain with the NDA. It is anticipated that the proposed restructuring, utilising the powers given to the NDA under the Energy Act 2004, will provide the most efficient and robust means of implementing Government policy in future without the need to go through the costly and time-consuming establishment of new statutory bodies.

Organic Food

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much in-season organic food has been grown in the UK each year since 2000. (98285)

The Government collect information from UK organic certification bodies relating to land area utilised but not the volume of food produced. This information is shown in the following table.

UK organic and in-conversion land use (2000-06)

Thousand hectares

December 2000

527.3

December 2001

679.6

June 2002

699.9

December 2002

724.5

March 2003

741.2

January 2004

695

January 2005

674.5

January 2006

619.9

Pet Fairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what guidance he has issued on pet fairs; and whether he plans to bring forward amendments to the Animal Welfare Bill in relation to pet fairs. (97598)

The Department has not issued any formal guidance on pet fairs.

The Government do not consider it necessary to table any amendments to the Animal Welfare Bill in relation to pet fairs. The Bill will allow pet fairs to be regulated through secondary legislation to be made under clause 13. Any proposals will be subject to wide consultation.

Poultry Slaughterhouses

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps he is taking to encourage poultry slaughterhouses in England to change from constant voltage to constant current stunners; and if he will make a statement. (98840)

The Government funded research into the development of a constant current stunner, which showed that there are welfare benefits from this method. However, it also identified some practical limitations and we are not aware that any equipment manufacturer has to date produced a system that can be operated commercially.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many (a) broiler chicken and (b) turkey slaughterhouses in England use gas to kill the birds; and which gas mixtures are used in each case. (98841)

The most recent survey, conducted in 2003, indicated that two broiler chicken slaughterhouses and two turkey slaughterhouses use gas to kill the birds. Provided that the gas mixture used is permitted under the Welfare of Animals (Slaughter or Killing) Regulations 1995 (as amended), it is for the slaughterhouse operator to decide which gas mixture to use.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps he is taking to encourage poultry slaughterhouses in England to change from electrical stunning to non-aversive gas mixtures for the killing of broiler chickens and turkeys; and if he will make a statement. (98842)

Both electrical stunning and gas killing are legally permitted methods of slaughter under the EU slaughter directive (93/119/EC) and the Welfare of Animals (Slaughter or Killing) Regulations 1995 (as amended). It is for slaughterhouse operators to decide which method to adopt.

However, the use of non-aversive gas mixtures for the killing of broilers and turkeys does have welfare benefits over electrical systems, as there is no requirement for the shackling of live birds.

When the slaughter directive is reviewed, we will support making available all gas mixtures that have been demonstrated through research to be minimally aversive and deliver acceptable welfare at slaughter.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what estimate he has made of the proportion of (a) broiler chickens and (b) turkeys electrically stunned in England that (i) receive pre-stun electric shocks, (ii) are stunned using pulsed direct current, and (iii) have both carotid arteries severed at slaughter; and if he will make a statement. (98845)

The Department does not collect these data.

The Welfare of Animals (Slaughter or Killing) Regulations 1995 (as amended) require that no bird receives an electrical shock before stunning in a waterbath. If this does occur, enforcement action is taken by the Official Veterinarian to rectify the problem. In general, design modifications or alterations to the operation of the waterbath are effective in preventing pre-stun electrical shocks.

Severing both carotid arteries of birds at slaughter is good practice and is recommended in our white meat code of practice, which is currently being consulted upon.

Pre-movement Cattle Testing

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what estimate he has made of the effect on the incidence of bovine tuberculosis of pre-movement testing. (98750)

The effect on the incidence of bovine tuberculosis of pre-movement testing was considered in a regulatory impact assessment which is available on the DEFRA website at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/tb/pdf/prmt-regulatory.pdf. This assessment is being kept under review.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether his Department has estimated the cost to the farming industry of pre-movement testing of cattle. (98751)

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what estimate he has made of the financial implications for cattle farmers of the introduction of pre-movement testing for cattle over 15 months from 27 March 2006; and what financial implications he anticipates from the extension of pre-movement testing to cattle under 15 months from 1 March 2007. (98728)

[holding answer 1 November 2006]: Pre-movement tests are a private transaction between a farmer and their local veterinary inspector. Government continue to fund the provision of tuberculin and all routine TB surveillance tests, at a cost of approximately £40 million per year. These routine tests qualify as pre-movement tests if the animals are moved within 60 days of testing.

Cost sharing on animal health issues between Government and industry is a key part of our animal health and welfare strategy. As there are benefits to herd owners from buying or selling cattle with additional disease assurance, herd owners are now expected to share the costs of tests which are outside the routine surveillance programme.

The financial implications of pre-movement testing were considered in a regulatory impact assessment which is available on the DEFRA website at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/tb/pdf/prmt-regulatory.pdf. This assessment is being kept under review.

Protected Food Names

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what steps he is taking to encourage British producers to make use of the European Union protected food name scheme; (99225)

(2) what assessment he has made of the merits of the European Union protected food name scheme; and if he will make a statement.

The European Union (EU) protected food name scheme provides farmers and producers with a way in which to add value to their product and meet consumers’ demand for more regional and local food. Under DEFRA's Regional Food Strategy, we have tasked Food from Britain with working with the Regional Food Groups and producers to raise awareness of the scheme and encourage more applications.

Over the last two years DEFRA has written to a large number of trade associations and producers to remind them of the economic benefits to producers of achieving protected name status, and held positive meetings with a number of key organisations including the National Farmers' Union, the Country Land and Business Association, the English Beef and Lamb Executive, the British Pig Association and the Milk Development Council to discuss possible applications.

We have also commissioned research which can be found at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/foodrin/foodname/research/pdf/adasresearchpdo.pdf.

This research aimed to determine the awareness, perception, and attitudes towards, the EU protected food name schemes among UK retailers. I am pleased to say that all this effort is yielding some positive results. In addition to the 36 UK products which have been registered so far, a further nine applications have been submitted to the European Commission with 20 more at the UK stage of the application process.

Public Service Agreement

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what progress has been made towards the 2004 Spending Review Public Service Agreement target to reduce the gap in productivity between the least well-performing quartile of rural areas and the English median by 2008. (99438)

The progress which has been made towards the Public Service Agreement target to reduce the gap in productivity between the least well-performing quartile of rural areas and the English median is detailed in chapter 3 of the Departmental Report 2006. A copy is available in the House Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what progress has been made towards the 2004 Spending Review Public Service Agreement target to improve the accessibility of services for people in rural areas. (99439)

The progress which has been made towards the Public Service Agreement target of improving the accessibility of services in rural areas is set out in chapter 3 of the Departmental Report 2006, a copy of which has been deposited in the House Library.

Recycling

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps his Department is taking to encourage local authorities to expand their recycling programme to include (a) recycling of plastic and (b) kerb-side recycling. (98763)

Recycling is strongly promoted by a range of Government policies and we have set demanding targets, both nationally and locally, for household waste recycling and composting. However, these targets are not material-specific. The Waste Strategy review consultation, which we carried out earlier this year, also included proposals to set much more ambitious household waste recycling and composting targets, to reach 40 per cent. by 2010 and 50 per cent. by 2020. As well as encouraging more sustainable resource use, increasing recycling rates helps divert waste from landfill and therefore contributes to our efforts to reduce harmful greenhouse gas emissions. Local authorities’ ever- diminishing landfill allowances, allocated under the Landfill Allowance Trading Scheme, also provide a strong incentive to divert greater amounts of biodegradable waste from landfill.

Plastics can present a challenge for recycling as there are a number of different types in use, each requiring separate collection (or separation after collection) and treatment facilities to recycle. It inevitably takes time for this capacity to develop. However, more demanding recycling targets will mean authorities will be compelled to turn their attention to the more difficult waste streams, including plastics.

Under the Household Waste Recycling Act 2003, all local authorities in England will be required to collect at least two types of recyclable waste from all households in their area by the end of 2010. Most households already receive this, or a better, level of service.

The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP), funded by DEFRA and the devolved administrations, is working to promote sustainable waste management by creating stable and efficient markets for recycled materials and products, including plastics and compost. WRAP’s Recycling and Organics Technical Advisory Team (ROTATE) programme helps local authorities improve the efficiency of their recycling services. This includes advice to those planning to introduce a new scheme or the collection of a new material such as plastic.

Rivers

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what measures he is taking to ensure viable riverflows during periods of (a) drought and (b) high water use. (98011)

The Government’s approach to the management of sustainable water resources is the “twin track” approach which involves the consideration of demand management alongside sustainable resource development. The Environment Agency has a duty to secure the proper and efficient use of water resources in England and Wales. This includes the regulation of water abstraction from sources of supply including rivers, lakes, canals and underground sources through a system of licensing, to minimise damage to the environment.

Water companies have water resource management plans which look ahead 25 years and include projections of current and future demands for water. These plans are regularly updated to account for factors such as projections of household numbers and occupancy rates and the implications of climate change. The plans are due to become a statutory requirement in 2007.

Water companies also have drought plans to ensure the security of the public water supply in periods of drought. The Water Act 2003 has made the production of such plans a statutory requirement. The plans contain a series of steps, which cause the company to initiate a range of actions depending on the severity and extent of the drought.

Rural Payments Agency

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will ensure that the Rural Payments Agency makes a substantial part payment to farmers in England of the 2006 payments due to them under the Single Payment Scheme before the end of the 2006 calendar year. (97589)

[holding answer 31 October 2006]: The legal payment window runs from 1 December 2006 to 30 June 2007.

My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State said in his statement on 22 June 2006, Official Report, column 1478, that delivery of the 2006 Single Payment Scheme will be very challenging and that he did not want to commit to a particular payment timetable until the Chief Executive of the Rural Payments Agency has had an opportunity make a realistic assessment of the prospects. That remains the position.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the percentage staff turnover at the Rural Payments Agency has been in the past (a) six and (b) 12 months; and if he will make a statement. (98641)

[holding answer 31 October 2006]: The following table shows all starters and leavers in the last six and 12 months. “Leavers” includes those individuals who left on redundancy terms as part of the downsizing of RPA.

(a) Six months 1 May 2006 to 1 October 2006

(b) 12 months 1 November 2005 to 1 October 2006

Staff

3,157

3,148

Leavers

325

630

Starters

214

665

Increase/decrease (percentage)

-3.52

1.11

Seal Hunting

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps he is taking to help stop the commercial hunting of seals by Canada. (99506)

The Government are opposed to the Canadian seal hunt and would prefer all seal hunting for commercial purposes to be banned. The Government are considering a possible extension of the current ban on the import of certain seal products and will make a statement to the House once the outcome of the review is known. However, the seal hunt does not break any current international agreements, and so this is ultimately a matter for the Canadian Government.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether he has discussed the culling of seals in Canada with the Canadian Government. (99507)

The Government regularly makes their abhorrence of the Canadian seal hunt known to the Canadian authorities. On 27 February 2006 the former Secretary of State for Trade and Industry raised the seal hunt with the Canadian Minister of International Trade during an introductory telephone call, and most recently my right hon. Friend the Minister for Trade, Investment and Foreign Affairs raised the issue with the new Canadian high commissioner to London during an introductory meeting on 11 October 2006.

Single Farm Payment

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will re-consider the entry requirement for the single farm payment to ensure that only those who are genuinely farming are entitled to that payment. (95782)

[holding answer 23 October 2006]: The eligibility requirements for the single payment scheme, including the definition of a farmer, are set in EU legislation and I know of no plans to change them. However we will in due course consider if a de minimis should be applied to single farm payments.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether he plans to make interim payments under the single farm payments scheme for the year 2006-07; and if he will make a statement. (98700)

[holding answer 31 October 2006]: My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State said in his statement on 22 June 2006, Official Report, column 1478, that delivery of the 2006 single payment scheme will be very challenging and that he did not want to commit to a particular payment timetable until the Chief Executive of the Rural Payments Agency has had an opportunity to make a realistic assessment of the prospects. That remains the position.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what his estimate is of the proportion of farm income which was derived from the single farm payment scheme in (a) Lancashire and (b) the North West in each year since 1997. (98722)

The single payment scheme came into effect in the UK on 1 January 2005 and in that year was estimated to total £2.4 billion after deductions for modulation. Total payments to UK farmers less levies were estimated at £3.0 billion while total income from farming was £2.5 billion.

Estimates at a regional level are made by apportioning the total using standard gross margins. These are not available for Lancashire and are not yet available for 2005 for the North West.

£ million

Total subsidies including SPS

Total income from farming

UK

1997

2,777

2,864

1998

2,646

2,022

1999

2,692

2,053

2000

2,484

1,575

2001

2,459

1,847

2002

2,694

2,362

2003

2,796

3,081

2004

2,955

2,767

2005

3,043

2,521

North West

1997

154

80

1998

173

37

1999

176

50

2000

153

4

2001

138

46

2002

144

71

2003

163

94

2004

179

78

2005

n/a

n/a

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the European Commission's audit of England's 2005 single farm payment. (97627)

We are at an early stage in the European Commission's scrutiny of the 2005 single payment scheme (SPS) and have yet to receive any findings on which to base an assessment.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what his estimate is of the likely financial correction to be imposed by the European Commission for the delays and difficulties in administering England's 2005 single farm payment; how he reached this figure; and if he will make a statement. (97628)

There is a well established process for discussion on, and refinement of, any proposals for financial corrections that the European Commission may decide to make in due course. Experience of such proposals under the old CAP regime would suggest that that process would then take some time to reach a conclusion. However, in line with normal Government accounting arrangements, provisions and contingent liabilities totalling some £131 million have been shown in the 2005-06 departmental accounts, this being a prudent estimate based on the limited knowledge to date.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the expected expenditure is on the single farm payment in (a) 2006-07 and (b) 2007-08; and what the original budget allocated was in each case. (97649)

The UK national ceiling for single payment scheme (SPS) is €3.945 billion in 2006 and €3.961 billion in 2007. Actual expenditure in each year will depend on the extent to which farmers apply for payment against their SPS entitlements and the level of deductions that pertain to those applications, including the effects of eligibility and cross-compliance penalties, EU and national modulation and, possibly for the 2007 scheme, financial discipline.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many farmers have not received the single farm payment for 2005 because of enforced penalties for late submission of claim. (97679)

In 2005, 134 farmers applied after10 June which was the final deadline for submission for the single payment scheme and therefore received no payment.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many penalties for late claim single farm payments enforced by his Department have been appealed against. (97680)

The Rural Payments Agency has received 10 stage 1 appeals under the single payment scheme appeal procedure against penalties applied for the late submission of 2005 single payment scheme application forms.

Of the nine appeals that have been reviewed two cases were successful and seven were unsuccessful.

None of the unsuccessful cases have progressed to the second stage of the appeal procedure although two cases remain in time to do so.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many penalties for late claim single farm payments his Department enforced in the latest period for which figures are available; what the (a) largest and (b) average penalty was in that period; and if he will make a statement. (97681)

There have been 4,824 late claim penalties in respect of single payment scheme claims received in 2005, to a value of £3,252,879. The information on the largest penalty and the average penalty is not available.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will ensure that the Rural Payments Agency makes substantial part payments to farmers in England for the 2006 payments due under the single payment scheme before the end of the 2006 calendar year; and if he will make a statement. (98407)

[holding answer 1 November 2006]: My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State said in his statement on 22 June 2006, Official Report, column 1478, that delivery of the 2006 single payment scheme will be very challenging and that he did not want to commit to a particular payment timetable until the Chief Executive of the Rural Payments Agency has had an opportunity make a realistic assessment of the prospects. That remains the position.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what response he has made to the National Audit Office report on the single farm payment scheme. (99131)

My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State has welcomed the NAO’s thorough report. The Department and Rural Payments Agency will draw on its findings and recommendations, along with those in the forthcoming reports from the Public Accounts Committee and Environment Food and Rural Affairs Select Committee, in taking forward work on the single payment scheme.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what discussions he has had with his EU counterparts on decoupling of single farm payments. (99611)

The single payment scheme is already decoupled. However, in discussions with the European Commission and other Members of the EU Agriculture Council, UK representatives, led by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State, continue to press the case for completing the process of decoupling by removing the remaining coupled direct aid schemes.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many farmers in Essex are still waiting for their single farm payments; and when he expects all outstanding payments to have been made. (97702)

[holding answer 30 October 2006]: The single payment scheme is not administered on a regional basis, so it is not possible to identify specific payments outstanding to farmers in Essex.

As at 17 October, 114,037 claimants (97.91 per cent.) had received a total of £1.510 billion (99.7 per cent.) in full or partial payments based on an estimated total number of claimants of 116,474 and an estimated total fund value of £1.515 billion.

Of approximately 2,400 customers who have yet to receive a payment, most have claims valued below €1,000 (£682). This figure includes 58 outstanding priority one customers (those due an estimated €1,000 or above) with complex cases involving issues such as probate, liquidation and business partnership disputes.

The Rural Payments Agency will endeavour to pay outstanding cases as soon as possible, although it is not possible to suggest a timeframe to clear all cases.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the estimated cost was to (a) his Department and (b) farmers of delays in administering the single payment to farmers in Suffolk. (97990)

Additional costs, in the form of reduced EU funding, may arise in relation to payments under the 2005 single payment scheme (SPS) which are made after the end of the regulatory payment window on 30 June 2006. However, it is not yet possible to say what if any costs will arise in practice as that depends on the outcome of ongoing discussions with the European Commission and the amount and timing of outstanding payments across the UK.

As announced on 22 June 2006, Official Report, column 1478, the RPA is also paying interest payments to those claimants who had not received their full SPS payment by 30 June 2006 subject to a £50 de minimis. As at 11 October 2006, £318,201 in interest payments had been made.

Drawing on the advice received from the British Banking Association, the NAO has estimated that payments beyond February or March could have cost farmers between £18 million and £22.5 million in interest and arrangement fees on additional bank loans and increased short-term borrowings on overdrafts.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what proportion of his Department’s proposed budget reduction is the result of (a) changes in Treasury accounting rules, (b) the administration of the 2005 single payment scheme and (c) underspending in previous years. (98208)

Like all large organisations, DEFRA faces new financial pressures each year which require us to constantly review and adjust our spending plans. The current financial year (2006-07) brought several such pressures that meant the Department had to reduce its original resource budgets by around £200 million (about 7 per cent. of our resource budget baseline funding). These pressures stemmed from:

surplus capital charge budget no longer being available to fund programme expenditure due to new tighter rules governing public expenditure (around 30 per cent.);

costs deferred from 2005-06, not as a result of underspending but arising from pressure on the budget that year (around 45 per cent.);

with the balance relating to pressures identified since the beginning of this year. This included cover for RPA’s running costs (around 11 per cent.), including administration of the single payment scheme for both 2005 and 2006.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much farmers in (a) the Wantage constituency, (b) Oxfordshire and (c) the south east have received payments from the single farm payment scheme in each year since it was introduced. (98246)

A breakdown of payments made under the English 2005 single payment scheme is not currently available but will be published in due course.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what proportion of the re-prioritisation of his Department’s spending for 2006-07 to meet unavoidable extra costs was due to (a) additional resources for the single farm payment scheme, (b) the response to avian influenza and (c) other reasons; what other reasons there were; and if he will make a statement. (98512)

As with other large organisations, DEFRA faces new financial pressures each year which require constant review and re-adjustment to our spending plans. The current financial year (2006-07) brought several such pressures that meant the Department had to reduce its original resource budgets by around £200 million (about 7 per cent. of the Department’s resource baseline funding and about 5 per cent. of the overall budget). These pressures stemmed from:

RPA’s running costs (about 11 per cent.), including administration of the single payment scheme for both 2005 and 2006;

Avian influenza (about 5 per cent.);

surplus capital charge budget no longer being available to fund programme expenditure due to new tighter rules governing public expenditure (around 30 per cent.);

costs deferred from 2005-06 (around 45 per cent.);

other miscellaneous pressures (about 9 per cent.).

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much contingency funding has been set aside for the payment of EU penalties in relation to the single farm payment scheme in 2005-06 and 2006-07; and if he will make a statement. (98689)

There is a well established process for discussion on, and refinement of, any proposals for financial corrections that the European Commission may decide to make in due course. Experience of such proposals under the old CAP regime would suggest that that process would then take some time to reach a conclusion. However, in line with normal Government accounting arrangements, provisions and contingent liabilities totalling some £131 million have been shown in the 2005-06 Departmental accounts, this being a prudent estimate based on the limited knowledge to date.

South Downs National Park

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the present position is regarding the possible creation of a South Downs National Park; and if he will make a statement. (99198)

The designation process for the proposed South Downs National Park has been put on hold while DEFRA appeals against a High Court judgment in respect of the New Forest National Park designation. Known as the “Meyrick” judgment, it has implications for any future National Park designations or boundary variations as it potentially changes the way in which the criteria for National Parks have generally been understood and interpreted since the first National Parks in England were designated.

DEFRA's appeal was heard by the Court of Appeal on 1 November and the outcome is now awaited. Only when that is resolved will the Secretary of State be able to decide how to re-start the South Downs process, including whether or not to invite further representations.

Tenancy Reform

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what reforms have now been introduced as part of the tenancy reform industry group proposals. (97595)

The proposals of the Tenancy Reform Industry Group (TRIG) for legislative change have now been incorporated into the Regulatory Reform Order (Agricultural Tenancies) (England and Wales) Order 2006 which amends the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 and the Agricultural Tenancies Act 1995. The Order was first laid before Parliament on 30 March and came into force on 19 October. The Order will promote a healthy and competitive tenanted sector without removing tenant protection, or disrupting the landlord and tenant balance. In particular, the Order will:

(a) Enable a successor to a tenancy to earn income from diversified activities without losing the right to succession, where the landlord consents,

(b) Enable landlords and tenants to reach their own agreements on rent reviews and end of tenancy compensation,

(c) Make it easier for landlords and tenants to restructure holdings held under a 1986 Act tenancy,

(d) Remove the need for unnecessary applications to the Agricultural Land Tribunal where a landlord agrees on the successor to the tenancy,

(e) Enable landlords and tenants to agree the length of a notice period to suit their particular circumstances, providing it is longer than the minimum period of 12 months.

These changes will foster tenant farmer diversification and enable landlords and tenants to adapt to the modern agricultural climate.

Tuberculosis Advisory Group

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when and why the decision was taken to choose a small number for the tuberculosis advisory group; and whether any of the members chosen were co-opted. (99713)

As part of their role, the TB advisory group will be asked to consider specific issues raised by Ministers and the chief veterinary officer. On 19 July, Ministers agreed to keep membership of the group small to allow the chairman to bring in further expertise depending on the task and/or discussions.

The chairman considered applicants for the group and made his recommendations to the chief veterinary officer. All members will serve in a personal capacity and bring a balance of experience across farming, veterinary, conservation and welfare issues.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many people were interviewed for the post of chair of the tuberculosis advisory group. (99714)

Five people were interviewed forthe post of chairman of the TB advisory group. The application and appointment process was conducted in line with Nolan procedures and the guidance laid down by the Office for the Commissioner for Public Appointments.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will publish the terms of reference for the tuberculosis advisory group. (99715)

The TB advisory group’s terms of reference were published on 20 July 2006 when the chairman, Peter Jinman, was appointed. Further information is available on the DEFRA website at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/tb/partnership/advisorygroup.htm.

Waste Management

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what his Department’s policy is on increased mass-burn incineration of London’s waste. (98390)

London, in common with every other region in the UK, must achieve massive reductions in the extent to which it relies on landfilling its waste. We would prefer this to be achieved as far as possible by minimisation, reuse and recycling, but where this is not practicable, energy from waste (including mass burn incineration with energy recovery) offers substantial greenhouse gas emission savings over landfill.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what estimate he has made of the likely cost to the Greater London Authority of the proposed new duty on waste authorities to undertake their functions in general conformity with the Mayor’s Municipal Waste Management Strategy. (98391)

The proposed duty on waste authorities to undertake their functions in general conformity with the Mayor’s Municipal Waste Management Strategy will not impose additional costs on the Greater London Authority. The new duty, along with the Mayor’s existing power of direction, will help ensure the strategic vision the Mayor sets out for London is delivered on the ground.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what steps he is taking to deliver efficiency savings in waste management in London; (98392)

(2) what estimate he has made of the projected savings in waste management in London over the next 10 years; and what other estimates of such savings he has examined.

Mott MacDonald carried out work, jointly commissioned by DEFRA and the Greater London Authority (GLA), on opportunities for efficiency gains in waste management services in London. The report estimates that London authorities would need to generate efficiency savings of £45 million in 2007-08 and £145 million in 2009-10. The report considers efficiency savings that are achievable in London’s waste and identifies a number of areas where efficiency savings are possible. The report is published on the GLA website at:http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/environment/waste/lswa/index.isp

“The Greater London authority: The Government’s Final Proposals for Additional Powers and Responsibilities for the Mayor and Assembly”, concluded that the creation of a Single London Waste Authority responsible for waste disposal would not generate significant cost savings, and could even increase the costs of dealing with London’s waste. Further information is available on the Department for Communities and Local Government’s website at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1501733.

We are making good progress towards achieving our Gershon efficiency savings on waste. Provisional figures for environmental services indicate that £245 million per annum of efficiency gains are expected to be achieved in 2006-07 (£55 million of which is expected to be achieved within London). This puts us well ahead of schedule to meet the £299 million per annum target for environmental services in 2007-08.

DEFRA will continue to facilitate efficiencies across England (including London) through:

(i) The Waste Implementation Programme which includes work-streams providing standard documentation, toolkits, best practice case studies, funding to local authorities for consultancy work, advice on technology choices, good quality data and help with Private Finance Initiatives and other funding arrangements.

(ii) The new Waste Infrastructure Development Programme (WIDP). WIDP aims to complement and expand on DEFRA's current efforts to comply with European Union Landfill Directive targets by:

(a) establishing the scale of residual waste treatment infrastructure required to meet the landfill Directive targets in 2010, 2013 and beyond and accurately monitoring the ongoing delivery of projects in order to stay abreast of continuing requirements; and

(b) developing and implementing measures which will accelerate the delivery of the necessary residual waste treatment infrastructure in a timely, value-for-money and affordable manner.

(iii) Support to the Regional Centres of Excellence—which have been drafting a national action plan on Environmental Services efficiency, supported by regional action plans;

(iv) The Waste and Resources Action Programme, which is funded by DEFRA and provides a wide range of support and best practice to local authorities on reducing and recycling waste;

(v) Other enablers, such as the Office of Government Commerce on procurement, and local authorities sharing best practice including through the Beacon council scheme.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what representations he has received on Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority’s submission for the project to deliver recycling, treatment and disposal services. (96902)

The Secretary of State received a letter, dated 18 May 2006, from Councillor Steve Foulkes in his capacity as chairman of the Merseyside Leaders’ Group. The letter covered a number of issues including Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority’s proposed waste private finance initiative project and generic waste issues faced by councils nationally.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what discussions he has had with (a) ministerial colleagues and (b) local authorities about the level of support available to Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority to meet its statutory obligations. (96903)

The Secretary of State has had no discussions with ministerial colleagues or local authorities regarding the level of support available to Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority. However, my officials have been in productive discussion with officers from the Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority, since the start of this calendar year, regarding their long-term procurement for delivering recycling, treatment and disposal services.

Wessex Flood Defence Committee

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the (a) salary and (b) other costs were of the Director of the Wessex Flood Defence Committee in each of the last five years. (98442)

The current salary of the Chairman of the Wessex Regional Flood Defence Committee is £16,397. It is anticipated that the Chairman’s salary and other costs (£5,212 in 2005-06) will continue to rise in line with inflation during the next five years.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many overseas visits on official business the Chairman of the Wessex Flood Defence Committee made in each of the last five years. (98443)

The Chairman of the Wessex Flood Defence Committee attended a conference in the Netherlands in June, marking the closure of a large European project, the Joint Approach for Managing Flooding.

No further overseas trips on official business are anticipated.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the (a) salary and (b) other costs were of the Chairman of the Wessex Flood Defence Committee in each of the last five years. (98446)

The Chairman of the Wessex Flood Defence Committee's salary and other costs including Employer’s National Insurance contributions, with travel and subsistence since April 2002, are shown in the following table:

(£)

Salary

Other costs

Total

2002-03 G. Sturdy

14,860

3,668

18,528

2003-04 G Sturdy/H.Temperley

15,190

5,811

21,001

2004-05

15,495

7,076

22,571

2005-06

15,880

5,212

21,092

2006-07

16,397

15,306

21,703

1 Projection based on expenses incurred until July end 2006

The Chairman of the Wessex Regional Flood Defence Committee undertook 73 official trips in 2004-05 and 48 official journeys in 2005-06. The travel costs during this period totalled £7,640.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the costs relating to the running of the Wessex Flood Defence Committee were in each of the last five years. (98452)

The costs of running the Wessex Flood Defence Committee for 2005-06 were as follows:

(£)

Chairman's Salary

15,880

National Insurance

2,033

Catering/Subsistence

2,514

Travel

2,378

Financial Loss Allowance

1,149

Total

23,954

No detailed figures are available for the cost of running the Committee in previous years. Since the number of meetings each year has not changed in the last five years, the costs will be of the same order, allowing for inflation. The costs for 2006-07 are projected to be £24,500, based on the costs incurred in the first six months of this year.

Wildlife Officers

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will reconsider the proposal to make wildlife officers compulsorily redundant. (97954)

[holding answer 30 October 2006]: The Department issued compulsory redundancy notices to 19 wildlife officers (WOs) on 27 October. These WOs are based on two sites at Polwhele (near Truro) and Aston Down (near Stroud).

There has been no work for the WOs since April 2006, and there is no prospect of future work for the WOs at the WLU sites in future. Although no announcement has been made on any future badger culling policy, Ministers have made it quite clear since last December that, if there was to be a culling policy, it would not be delivered by Government employees. DEFRA can no longer justify retaining these staff when there is no work for them to do.

Every effort has been made to redeploy the WOs affected, including retraining and experience postings. Of the original 77 WOs:

46 have taken voluntary redundancy since April;

12 are on temporary loan or experience posting or secondment and will not be issued with notice at this stage; and

19 remain without work or redeployment, and will be issued with notice on 27 October.

Those issued with notice will have six months’ notice of redundancy during which efforts to redeploy and retrain will continue. The Department remains committed to making every effort to avoid compulsory redundancy. However, in this case, the conclusion has been reached that there is no option and nothing to be gained by any further delay. Consultation with departmental and national unions has taken place, and the Department has followed the guidelines issued to all civil service departments to avoid compulsory redundancies wherever possible.

Trade and Industry

Biofuels

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what change there has been in levels of production of biofuels in the United Kingdom since 2000. (98663)

I have been asked to reply.

Detailed information on the production of biofuels in the UK in the year 2000 is not held centrally, but the total amount produced is likely to have been very small. In July 2002, the Government introduced a 20- pence-per-litre fuel duty incentive for biodiesel, and in January 2005 it introduced a similar fuel duty incentive for bioethanol. These have led to a steady increase in UK biofuel sales, which in September 2006 were running at some 25 million litres a month. Approximately two-thirds of current sales are made up of biodiesel, the great majority of which is produced in the UK.

The Government announced in November 2005 that they would introduce a renewable transport fuel obligation, the effect of which will be to create a large new market for biofuels in the UK. This has led to a significant amount of investment in new UK biofuel production facilities. There are currently two major biodiesel production plants in operation in the UK—the ArgentEnergy plant near Motherwell and the Biofuels Corporation plant in Teesside—which between them are capable of producing some 300 million litres of high quality biodiesel a year, some of which is exported. A number of other biodiesel plants are at the planning and construction stage, including a Greenergy plant at Immingham which is due to come on stream in 2007. No bioethanol is yet produced in the UK, although a number of plants are at the planning and construction stage, including a British Sugar plant at Wissington in Norfolk and a Green Spirit plant at Henstridge in Somerset.

Bridges Community Development Venture Fund

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much money his Department has provided to the Bridges Community Development Venture Fund; and what plans he has to allocate further funds. (99349)

The Government have committed £20 million to the Bridges Community Development Venture Fund, of which £15,454,434 has been drawn down to date. There are no plans to allocate further funding.

Bulgaria

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made of the potential impact of the regulatory arrangements for the utilities sector in Bulgaria on UK companies investing in that sector. (98656)

While there has been no formal assessment of the potential impact of the regulatory arrangements for the utilities sector in Bulgaria by the Department, an important consideration for many UK companies wishing to invest in the utilities sector overseas is transparent, independent regulation.

In Bulgaria, the State Energy and Water Regulatory Commission has been set up to provide the administrative infrastructure and the authority to implement efficient regulation in these sectors. In general, because its procedures follow closely those of OFWAT, this should be an advantage to UK companies, who are familiar with working in a regulated environment.

The implementation of these regulatory procedures is, however, at an early stage in respect of the water utilities.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made of the investment climate for UK companies wishing to invest in Bulgaria. (98657)

Bulgaria's stable political and economic environment has created a favourable climate for inward investment resulting in approximately$2,324.2 million of foreign direct investment in 2005, including $245 million from the UK.

Burmese Imports

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will take steps with his EU counterparts to bring the EU trade regulations affecting imports of Burmese origin into line with those in the USA. (98076)

The UK and Burma are both members of the World Trade Organisation and are obliged to abide by its rules. To require imports from Burma to be compulsorily labelled as to their country of origin would be incompatible with the non-discrimination obligations of the WTO. Such labelling/marking is not currently a compulsory requirement for any goods sold in the European Community whether imported or EU-produced.

Chlorofluorocarbon Gases

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what factories in Europe produce chlorofluorocarbon gases; and for which UK products such gases produced in Europe are supplied. (98676)

I have been asked to reply.

Only one company in Europe produces chlorofluorocarbon (CFCs) gases for UK companies and this company is based in Spain (Arkema). Some of this production is for two UK companies and the CFCs are used for some CFC-based metered dose inhalers for asthma patients, and to help satisfy needs in developing countries.

Coal-fired Power Stations

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what progress has been made on new initiatives to make all new coal-fired power stations carbon neutral. (99338)

The Department allocated £35 million for the demonstration of carbon abatement technologies, which include both cleaner coal and carbon capture and storage. The first call is worth £10 million with the remaining £25 million being split between two additional calls in the future. Some £20 million annually is also allocated in the Department's technology programme for research and development into a range of clean energy technologies including carbon abatement technologies.

The EU emissions trading scheme is intended to provide a strong commercial incentive for the take-up by new and existing coal-fired power stations and other carbon emitting installations of these technologies, if and when they become a cost-efficient way of reducing or avoiding carbon emissions.

Colombia

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what discussions he has had with his counterpart in the Colombian government with regard to bilateral trade in the telecommunications sector. (97859)

Credit Card Debt

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what is the current level of credit card debt. (99340)

Figures from the Office of National Statistics record total consumer credit card debt at £55 billion in August 2006.

Departmental IT

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry which of his Department's databases are (a) wholly and (b) partly operated by external organisations or individuals; and which organisations and individuals own those databases. (97781)

Under the private finance initiative contract Fujitsu operate the MATRIX (electronic document record management), CALIPSOE (human resource personnel) and CAPRI (correspondence handling) systems on behalf of the DTI headquarters.

Under a service contract AMEY operate the MENTOR (Financial) system on behalf of the DTI HQ.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry which databases operated by his Department are located (a) wholly and (b) partly outside the UK; and where each of those databases and parts of databases is located. (97782)

Departmental Staff

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if his Department will (a) carry out an age audit of its staff to establish an age profile of its work-force, (b) negotiate an age management policy with trade unions and employees to eliminate age discrimination and retain older workers, (c) identify and support training needs and offer older staff flexible working to downshift towards retirement and (d) extend to over-50s the right to request to work flexibly and the right to training with paid time off; and if he will make a statement. (96502)

The information is as follows:

(a) The Department regularly monitors the age profile of its work force.

(b) The Department has developed a diversity action plan in order to meet its aim of enabling all staff to reach their full potential, in discussion with the trade unions and the Department's diversity advisory groups and in line with the commitments set out in the Cabinet Office 10-point plan on diversity. The Department is committed to addressing discrimination on all grounds, including age and will complete diversity impact assessments on relevant policies to ensure that staff are treated fairly.

(c) As part of our annual appraisal process all staff are encouraged to identify and support training needs appropriate to their individual situation. Individuals and managers regularly review these as part of the reporting process.

(d) The Department is fully committed to flexible working and to providing its staff with the opportunity for good work life balance., Therefore all staff, of whatever age, are eligible for to apply to work flexibly and their applications are given careful consideration. Any member of staff may apply for special leave with pay to undertake approved adult further education.

As part of the diversity action plan the Department will be delivering diversity awareness training to all staff in the Department that will cover age discrimination.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many employees in (a) his Department and (b) its (i) agencies and (ii) non-departmental public bodies were affected by the rise in the minimum wage on 1 October 2006. (98115)

Across DTI, its executive agencies and its non-departmental public bodies, two employees were affected by the rise in the national minimum wage on 1 October 2006.

Economic Partnership Agreements

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what representations he has received from (a) African, Caribbean and Pacific Governments, (b) UK companies, (c) other companies, (d) corporate umbrella groups and trade associations and (e) other EU Governments with regard to economic partnership agreements. (98478)

The Minister for Trade and Investment and Foreign Affairs has had numerous representations from ACP and other EU Governments, and I will be meeting with ACP Ministers and their negotiators at the Commonwealth Secretariat on 2 November and look forward to further discussion on that occasion. The Department has received some representations from UK businesses and umbrella organisations who want EU tariffs to be lowered further to ensure they are able to use competitively priced imports. However, no business representation has been received seeking access to ACP markets.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry when he expects to bring forward each of the economic partnership agreements between the EU and African, Caribbean and Pacific nations for ratification by Parliament; and if he will make a statement. (98480)

Negotiations between the European Commission and ACP regions on economic partnership agreements are due to be completed by the end of 2007. As the question of ratification will depend on the content of the agreement, we will not be able to give a clearer answer until closer to that point.

Employment Tribunals

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many employment tribunals involving a pre-hearing on the employment status of the appellant took place in (a) 2004-05 and (b) 2005-06; and how many of the pre-hearings were (i) appealed and (ii) overturned on appeal. (99503)

The number of employment tribunal claims which had a pre-hearing in 2004-05 and 2005-06 is as follows:

Number

2004-05

3,501

2005-06

5,171

The tribunals service does not specifically record the number of pre-hearings on employment status or how many of the pre-hearings were appealed and overturned on appeal.

Energy Research Centre

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what funding is provided to the UK Energy Research Centre by his Department; what the aims of the body are; and how many staff are employed by it. (99933)

The research councils have allocated the UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC) funding of £13.876 million over the period 2004-09. The UKERC aims to: generate, synthesise and disseminate knowledge and insight on sustainable energy systems to enable cohesive research supporting UK energy policy goals; act as a source of authoritative information on energy research, development and demonstration competences in the UK; co-ordinate the national energy research network (a network for energy researchers); and underpin the quest for sustainable energy solutions through undertaking interdisciplinary programmes of research.

UKERC’s funding covers six research programmes plus supporting functions. It is a collaboration between eight academic and research institutions. 59 researchers (33 full-time equivalents) plus seven administrative/support staff (5.7 FTE) are supported by the UKERC. All of these are directly employed by their parent academic or research institution. Eighteen studentships are also funded through UKERC.

Farepak

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry when he plans to meet the directors of Farepak. (96695)

[holding answer 24 October 2006]: The Minister for Trade has no plans personally to meet the directors of Farepak.

My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry has already announced that the Department's companies investigation branch is conducting an inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the failure of Farepak and our officials will seek to interview whomever they consider can assist them in their inquiries.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether he is planning to meet the directors of HSBC to discuss the collapse of Farepak. (96696)

[holding answer 24 October 2006]: The Minister for Trade has no plans personally to meet the directors of Farepak’s bank.

My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry has already announced that the Department’s companies investigation branch is conducting an enquiry into the circumstances surrounding the failure of Farepak and our officials will seek to interview whomever they consider can assist them in their inquiries.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry when he expects the administrator BDO Stoy Hayward to report on the closure of Farepak. (98690)

Administrators were appointed on 13 October over Farepak Food and Gifts Ltd. They have six months from the date of their appointment within which to report to my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State on the conduct of the directors of the company.

The Administrators will publish an initial report to Creditors on the finances of the company within six weeks.

My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry has already announced that the DTI’s criminal investigation branch is conducting an inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the future of Farepak.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what representations he has received from the Hamper Industry Trade Association with regard to the collapse of Farepak. (98691)

None, but my right hon. Friend the Minister for Trade will be meeting the association in the near future.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether he is planning to meet the directors of HBOS to discuss the collapse of Farepak. (98918)

[holding answer 2 November 2006]: My right hon. Friend the Minister for Trade has no plans to meet the directors of Farepak’s bank.

My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry has already announced that my department’s companies investigation branch is conducting an enquiry into the circumstances surrounding the failure of Farepak and our officials will seek to interview whomever they consider can assist them in their inquiries.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what discussions he has had with the Farepak administrator on (a) asset recovery, (b) asset disposal and (c) the position of creditors. (99081)

[holding answer 2 November 2006]: I have met the administrators to discuss their preliminary findings. The administrators have issued some information by way of press releases and by updating the Farepak website. They are required to report their appointment to the creditors (so far as they are aware of their addresses) within 28 days of their appointment, unless the court directs otherwise. They are also required within three months of the date of their appointment (or such other period as the court may allow) to put their proposals for achieving the purpose of the administration to the creditors for consideration.

Fur Trade

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what representations his Department is making to the European Commission regarding the trading of cat and dog fur. (97638)

Officials in DTI and DEFRA are in contact with their European Commission counterparts concerning the trade in cat and dog fur and we understand that a proposal is likely to be published by the European Commission shortly. The proposal from the European Commission is in response to calls from the UK and other member states for EU action.

Furniture and Furnishing Regulations

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry pursuant to the answer to question 96606, if he will apply the Furniture and Furnishing (Fire) (Safety) Regulations 1988 to imported furniture at the point of entry into the UK, with particular reference to sofas. (99849)

The Furniture and Furnishings (Fire) (Safety) Regulations 1988 apply to imported upholstered furniture destined for the domestic market, including sofas. These regulations apply at the point of entry to the UK and are enforced by Trading Standards. HM Revenue and Customs liaises with Trading Standards on furniture imports as appropriate.

General Affairs and External Relations Committee

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what discussions were held with (a) Ministers and (b) officials from other EU Governments at the October General Affairs and External Relations Committee in Luxembourg on economic partnership agreements; and if he will make a statement. (98476)

No formal bilateral discussions were held in the margins of the General Affairs and External Relations Committee in Luxembourg, although the UK, and other EU member states, raised issues surrounding economic partnership agreements during the General Affairs Council discussion.

IT Projects

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (1) what his Department's five most expensive (a) web and (b) non-web information technology projects have been since 2001; (98564)

(2) how much his Department has spent on (a) information technology projects and (b) web-facing information technology projects in each year since 2001;

(3) how many and what percentage of information technology projects undertaken by or for his Department since 2001 have been delivered (a) over budget, (b) after their original deadline, (c) on budget, (d) under budget, (e) on their original deadline and (f) ahead of their original deadline;

(4) how many (a) information technology projects and (b) web-facing information technology projects his Department has undertaken in each year since 2001.

Due to a change in the DTI HQ's accounting system and the devolved nature of the ICT until April 2006, consistent information of all the material requested cannot be obtained without disproportionate cost.

During this period the Department's IT services has been provided through a PFI agreement with Fujitsu Services covering desktop services, web infrastructure services, documents management and HR systems. The current annual running cost is in the region of £30 million.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much his Department has spent on information technology consultants in each year since 2001; and how many of those consultants worked on web-facing projects. (98611)

Due to a change in the DTI HQ's accounting system and the devolved nature of the ICT until April 2006, consistent information to answerthe question fully cannot be obtained without disproportionate cost.

We are however able to provide information for IT consultancy contracts let since April 2006. The total amount to date is £288,132. Only one of these consultants worked on a web-facing project.

Loan/Credit Companies

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many loan and credit companies are registered; and how many new registrations of such companies there were in each year since 1987. (98692)

The Office of Fair Trading is responsible for consumer credit licensing. OFT current figures show that there are currently 128,944 licence holders. The following table details the number of licences issued each year since 1987.

Number of Licences Issued

1987

20,312

1988

21,969

1989

26,323

1990

24,998

1991

24,203

1992

20,504

1993

18,906

1994

16,927

1995

15,547

1996

16,595

1997

17,852

1998

20,818

1999

18,785

2000

16,603

2001

15,131

2002

16,074

2003

16,510

2004

15,853

2005

15,726

2006

10,514

Since 31 October 2004, the Financial Services Authority has been responsible for regulating mortgage lending. FSA figures record that in 2004-05, the number of regulated mortgage businesses was 3,935 and in 2005-06, the number of such businesses was 3,589.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what (a) legislation and (b) other regulations govern (a) on-line money lending companies and (b) companies taking credit for Christmas goods; and if he will make a statement. (98696)

Companies offering credit to consumers, including by on-line methods, are subject to regulation under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and/or the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. There is no form of regulation with specific application to businesses which take advance payments for goods or vouchers to be delivered at a future date, though all normal consumer, contract and insolvency legislation will apply.

My right hon. Friend the Minister for Trade, is due to meet the chief executive officer of the OFT to ask him to consider reviewing the need for regulation of Christmas club companies.

Moldova (Wine Imports)

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make representations to the European Commission to facilitate the import of wine from Moldova. (99194)

There are no restrictions on imports of wine into the EU and like any other wine producer, Moldova can sell its wine to EU consumers provided the relevant EU import duty is paid.

National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many staff have been employed by the National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship for each year since its inception; and what its total budget has been in each year. (97321)

The National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship was established in 2003. The following table shows the number of permanent staff it employs, and its total budget (provided jointly between DTI and DfES) for each year.

Staff (Number)

Budget (£)

2003-04

1

200,000

2004-05

5

810,000

2005-06

6

760,000

2006-07

7

900,000

National Institute for Medical Research

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what the estimated cost is of the move of the National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill to the site of the former National Temperance Hospital in Camden; what assessment has been made of the potential implications for public safety of the move; and if he will make a statement. (98909)

The cost of the relocation of the NIMR from Mill Hill to central London has yet to be finally determined. The Medical Research Council is currently undertaking an appraisal of a wide range of possible options, and hopes to be able to identify a preferred option by December 2006.

The MRC has consulted Government security experts and the Health and Safety Executive, as is the case with all major building projects, and will continue to do so.

Older Employees

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what estimate he has made of the number of employees aged over 65 years whose employment was terminated before October 2006 by companies aiming to avoid the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006. (98091)

We have no evidence that in the period before the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 came into force there was an increase in the number of older workers whose employment was terminated in anticipation of the legislation. Indeed, the labour force survey shows that job growth among employees aged 65 years or older has in recent years occurred at a much faster pace than for employees aged below 65.

Packaging (Essential Requirements) Regulations

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many (a) prosecutions and (b) convictions there have been for excessive packaging under the Packaging (Essential Requirements) Regulations 2003. (99941)

To date, four successful prosecutions have been brought under the Packaging (Essential Requirements) Regulations.

Palm Oil

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what volume of palm oil was imported from Colombia in each of the last five years; what the total UK market share Colombian palm oil had in the sector in the same period; and if he will make a statement. (98660)

According to information published by HM Revenue and Customs the volume of palm oil imported into the UK from Colombia in the last five years was as follows:

Metric Tonne

2001

61,998

2002

40,058

2003

64,271

2004

104,200

2005

110,670

Information on sales by UK manufacturers is suppressed for commercial confidentiality. Consequently, it is not possible to calculate the share of UK market held by imports from Colombia.

Panama Canal

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made of the implications of the plans to modernise the Panama canal for United Kingdom trade; and what assessment he has made of the likely impact of the plans for UK trade with (a) Japan, (b) China, (c) India and (d) Australia. (97858)

The canal is currently operating at its full capacity and the expansion will enable the very large container ships, presently unable to transit the canal, to use the route from 2014, doubling the current capacity of 14,000 ships a year. This represents around 5 per cent. of all world shipping.

While no formal assessment has been made on the implications for UK trade including our trade with Japan, China, India and Australia, it is expected that the expansion will benefit UK and global shipping companies by improving access through this key route.

Post Offices

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what plans he has for the future of the post office network in Sunderland; and whether the new card account for pensioners will be retained. (99886)

Post Office Ltd. is directly responsible for matters relating to the operations of a network of post offices in any given area around the country. I have therefore asked Alan Cook, Managing Director of POL, to reply direct to the hon. Member.

The Department for Works and Pensions' contract for the Post Office card account will expire in 2010, as it was always meant to. Exactly what accounts will be available beyond 2010 is not yet settled. Discussions between POL and the DWP are ongoing. The aim is to ensure that customers continue to have a range of choices in how they can access their money at post offices.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many post offices have closed in each parliamentary constituency in the last 10 years; how many post offices there were on 1st April 2006 in each parliamentary constituency; and if he will make a statement. (99540)

The question raised relates to operational matters for which Post Office Ltd. is directly responsible. The company compiles figuresfor post office branches in each parliamentary constituency on an annual basis. This information is placed in, and is available from, the Libraries of the House.

Regional Selective Assistance

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much funding has been clawed back from foreign companies that were in receipt of regional selective assistance because they failed to meet the conditions attached to the funding concerning job targets or target investment levels in each year since 1999, broken down by local authority area. (89340)

Regional selective assistance is only awarded to companies registered in the United Kingdom.

The total amount of RSA recovered from companies registered in the United Kingdom, who have overseas parent companies is outlined in the following table, for periods 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2006.

This information is broken down by each accounting year and by each local authority area.

Recoveries from foreign companies from 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2006

Total

1999-2000

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

Nottingham

500,000

500,000

Liverpool

100,000

100,000

North Tyneside

18,000,000

18,000,000

Newcastle-upon-Tyne

12,000,000

12,000,000

South Hams

244,687

244,687

Plymouth

156,502

16,000

140,502

Nuneaton and Bedworth

380,000

380,000

Birmingham

1,219,986

700,000

519,986

Glanford

236,535

236,535

Sheffield

16,150

16,150

North Lanarkshire

9,629,000

1,129,000

500,000

8,000,000

South Lanarkshire

1,880,896

88,215

175,000

1,470,000

100,000

47,681

North Ayrshire

667,000

633,000

34,000

South Ayrshire

20,000

20,000

Renfrewshire

968,295

385,320

430,000

73,000

79,975

West Lothian

20,888,121

1,098,039

30,932

16,966,014

2,473,136

320,000

East Dunbartonshire

200,000

200,000

West Dunbartonshire

640,000

640,000

Inverclyde

3,200,000

3,000,000

200,000

Glasgow

300,000

60,000

240,000

Fife

4,877,337

1,283,611

400,000

2,050,000

98,000

770,726

275,000

Angus

80,000

80,000

Dundee

280,000

275,000

5,000

Falkirk

100,000

100,000

Anglesey

771,555

771,555

Blaenau-Gwent

1,590,000

1,045,000

342,000

95,000

108,000

Bridgend

680,000

400,000

280,000

Merthyr Tydfil

226,295

177,545

48,750

Neath-Port Talbot

400,000

400,000

Newport

36,292,638

348,438

144,200

35,800,000

Rhonda Cynon Taff

3,115,000

1,165,000

1,950,000

Wrexham

95,500

95,500

Total

119,755,497

25,972,119

4,856,665

34,996,502

6,330,074

8,902,200

37,263,382

1,434,555

Savings Companies

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (1) if he will forward measures to strengthen the law to give greater protection from the closure of savings companies; (98693)

(2) what representations he has made to the Financial Services Authority on the closure of Farepak; and if he will make a statement.

Companies offering financial services, including savings companies, are already subject to specific regulation. One of the main objectives of this regulation is to protect savers and investors in the event of company failure, and I have at present no new measures in mind in relation to savings companies. The Minister for Trade, Investment and Foreign Affairs is meeting the chief executive of the Office of Fair Trading to ask the OFT to reassess the regulatory framework which applies to Christmas club companies such as Farepak, and whether changes are needed in that framework. He will consult other bodies as appropriate in the light of his discussion with the OFT.

UK-Burma Oil Trade

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what the value was of trade in oil between the UK and Burma in the most recent period for which figures are available. (99571)

In 2005 there were about 22,000 of petroleum products exported from the UK to Burma. Up to August 2006 there were exports worth about £1,000. In the same periods there have been no recorded petroleum imports from Burma into the UK.

World Trade

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what action his Department is taking to secure a successful Doha trade round of World Trade Organisation talks. (97860)

The Government remain fully committed to securing an ambitious, pro-development outcome to the Doha Development Agenda. Our priority is to restart the negotiations at the earliest opportunity, and to encourage WTO members to show the flexibility necessary to reach agreement. The UK Government have taken and will continue to take every opportunity to press for this, both within the EU and with other WTO members.

Health

Accident and Emergency

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many accident and emergency attendances there were in each quarter since the quarter ended December 2005, broken down by attendances to (a) type one accident and emergency departments, (b) walk-in centres and (c) minor injuries units. (92037)

The information is not available in the format requested. Information available is set out in the table.

Attendances at type one accident and emergency departments (A and E), walk in centres (WiCs) and type three A and E departments, England, quarter three 2005-06 to quarter one 2006-07

Quarter

Type one

WiCs

Type 3 (excluding WiCs)1

2005-06

3

3,346,995

616,165

484,321

2005-06

4

3,282,671

612,305

489,873

2006-07

1

3,509,769

629,417

583,148

1 A type three A and E department is defined as—other type of A and E, including minor injury units (MIUs) and WiCs with designated accommodation for the reception of A and E patients that provide treatment for at least minor illness and injury and can be routinely accessed without appointment. A type three department may be doctor-led or nurse-led. A service mainly or entirely appointment based (for example a general practitioner practice or out-patient clinic) is not a type three A and E service even though it may treat a number of patients with minor illness or injury.

Note:

MIUs are one type of type three A and E and will be included in these figures, but data are not collected separately for MIU attendance.

Source:

Department of Health dataset QMAE

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the pattern of admission to University hospital of Hartlepool accident and emergency department in each of the last five years, with particular reference to (a) day of the week of admission and (b) time of day of admission. (96175)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people waited for more than four hours to be seen in the accident and emergency (A&E) department at (a) St. Richard's hospital, Chichester, (b) Princess Royal hospital, Haywards Heath, (c) Worthing hospital, (d) Queen Alexandra hospital, Portsmouth and (e) Royal Sussex county hospital, Brighton in each of the last three years; and whether each of those hospitals met the Government target for A&E waiting times in each of those years. (94789)

The information requested is only collected at trust level. The table shows the number of people spending over four hours between arrival in accident and emergency and admission, transfer or discharge for Brighton and Sussex university hospitals national health service trust, Portsmouth hospitals NHS trust, Royal West Sussex NHS trust and Worthing and Southlands hospitals NHS trust for each of the last three years for which data is available.

Organisation

Total attendances (all A&E types)

Percentage of patients spending under four hours between arrival in A&E and admission, transfer or discharge (all A&E types)

Number of patients spending over four hours between arrival in A&E and admission, transfer or discharge(all A&E types)

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS

2003-04

112,695

82.6

19,556

2004-05

120,463

94.8

6,279

2005-06

124,386

93.8

7,651

Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust

2003-04

125,227

87.1

16,165

2004-05

129,790

95.0

6,454

2005-06

133,503

98.6

1,851

Royal West Sussex NHS Trust

2003-04

47,948

93.0

3,361

2004-05

48,344

97.0

1,449

2005-06

48,868

98.7

633

Worthing and Southlands Hospitals NHS Trust

2003-04

56,842

91.0

5,128

2004-05

61,333

97.0

1,827

2005-06

62,026

98.1

1,196

Note: The first full financial year during which trusts were required to meet 98 per cent. was 2005-06. Source: Department of Health dataset QMAE.

Abortions

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will assess the merits of reducing the time limit for abortions under the Abortion Act 1967. (99207)

It has long been the parliamentary convention that proposals for changes in the law on abortion have come from Back-Bench Members and that decisions are made on the basis of free votes. The Government believe this should still be the case. It is therefore a matter for Parliament to decide whether the current time limit should be changed. The Government have no plans to change the law on abortion.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many abortions were performed on pregnancies of (a) under nine weeks, (b) nine to 12 weeks, (c) 13 and 16 weeks, (d) 17 to 19 weeks, (e) 20 weeks, (f) 21 weeks, (g) 22 weeks, (h) 23 weeks and (i) 24 weeks and over in each of the last five years. (99870)

The information requested is set out in the following table.

Number of abortions, by gestation, residents, England and Wales, 2001-05

Gestation weeks

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Under nine

75,501

74,188

79,079

85,605

99,934

Nine to 12

79,368

79,542

79,370

76,924

66,547

13 to 16

14,724

15,064

15,357

15,454

13,373

17 to 19

3,994

4,264

4,849

4,518

3,925

20

740

782

783

814

925

21

723

730

779

778

700

22

698

712

699

735

539

231

515

533

530

463

336

24 and over

101

117

136

124

137

Total

176,364

175,932

181,582

185,415

186,416

1 Includes 24 weeks and zero days gestation.

Acinetobactor Baumannii

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the (a) impact and (b) spread of acinetobactor baumannii in hospitals; whether a new strain has been imported from Iraq; and if she will make a statement. (95324)

Microbiology laboratories in England, Wales and Northern Ireland voluntarily report bloodstream isolates of Acinetobacter species to the Health Protection Agency.

The numbers of A. baumannii bloodstream infections in England, Wales and Northern Ireland reported in the past five years are shown.

Number of infections

2001

233

2002

289

2003

323

2004

340

2005

371

Source:Health Protection Agency1

Part of the increase in cases of A. baumannii reflects the increase in the proportion of cases of acinetobacter bloodstream infections in which the organism has been fully identified to species level (51 per cent. in 2001, 62 per cent. in 2005). A. baumannii is one of the less difficult species to identify and both this and clinical concern have probably contributed to increased reporting.

Two multi-resistant clones of A. baumannii (Southeast clone, OXA-23 Clone 1) have affected hospitals in the United Kingdom in the past few years. Both clones have been identified in about 40 hospitals, predominantly in the London area and in south-east England2,3.

The HPA has advised hospitals to implement urgently robust infection control measures to prevent spread of these clones, and is currently undertaking an analysis of outcomes, in order to identify optimum treatment for those patients who become infected4.

A multi-resistant strain of A. baumannii, known as the T strain, has been isolated from casualties returning to the United Kingdom from Iraq5 but the exact source has not been identified. The T strain has also been isolated from US casualties from Iraq and it is very similar to the Southeast clone.

1 Acinetobacter spp bacteraemia in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: 2001 to 2005 Communicable Disease Report (CDR) Weekly 2006; 16 (42) 19 October 2006.

2 JF Turton, ME Kaufmann, M Warner et al. A prevalent, multiresistant clone of Acinetobacter baumanii in Southeast England. Journal of Hospital Infection 2004; 58: 170-179.

3 JM Coelho, JF Turton, ME Kaufman et al. Occurrence of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii clones at multiple hospitals in London and Southeast England. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2006; 44: 3623-3627.

4 Working Party Guidance on the Control of multi-resistant Acinetobacter Outbreaks. www.hpa.org.uk/infections/topics_az/acinetobacter_b/guidance.htm.

5 JF Turton, ME Kaufmann, MJ Gill et al. Comparison of Acinetobacter baumanii isolates from the United Kingdom and the United States that were associated with repatriated casualties of the Iraq conflict. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2006; 44: 2630-2634.

Acute Medical Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will investigate whether the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS trust followed appropriate codes of practice in considering complaints presented by local people on the recent consultation process on acute medical services provision. (99358)

A final decision on proposed changes to the provision of health services provided by University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Trust will be made shortly by the boards of the hospital trust and of the Cumbria and North Lancashire primary care trusts. This decision will then be considered by the overview and scrutiny committees of Cumbria and Lancashire county councils. The OSC has the power to refer the matter to the Secretary of State for Health if it believes that consultation has been inadequate or that it is not in the interests of the health service.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will urge the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Trust to reverse its decision to reduce staff by 90 posts until the conclusion of its acute medical services review. (99359)

The decision to reduce the number of posts at the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Trust has been taken in order to return the trust to financial balance and is not connected to the review of acute medical services. The trust board is responsible for taking these matters forward working in conjunction with its primary care trust partners and NHS North West.

Alzheimer's

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what representations she has received on the decision by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence that from 22 November people with Alzheimer’s disease should no longer be prescribed Alzheimer’s drugs on the NHS in the early and late stages of the disease. (97995)

Between 11 to 26 October 2006, the Department received 115 letters regarding the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence’s appraisal of drugs for the treatment of people with Alzheimer’s disease.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the clinical benefits of Alzheimer’s drugs at each stage of the disease; and what estimate she has made of the cost of such drugs at each stage. (97996)

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence has not yet published its final revised guidance to the national health service on drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. I understand that this guidance will be published on 22 November 2006.

Asbestos-related Cancer

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much was spent on medicines for people affected by asbestos-related cancer in the last period for which figures are available, broken down by type of drug. (97033)

Information on spending on individual treatments for cancer is not collected centrally.

Spending on cancer generally has increased: £3.4 billion was spent on cancer services in 2003-04 and this increased to around £3.8 billion in 2004-05.

Assisted Suicide/Voluntary Euthanasia

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what representations she has received since July 2006 from (a) doctors, (b) nurses and (c) other health care professions in (i) support of and (ii) opposition to (A) assisted suicide and (B) voluntary euthanasia; and if she will make a statement; (97865)

(2) how many times her Department has consulted (a) formally and (b) informally on end-of-life decision making since June 2006; if she will list the stakeholders who have made representations to her Department on end-of-life issues during this period; and if she will make a statement.

We have had 72 letters and e-mails from professionals, the public and organisations since July 2006 on end-of-life issues expressing a wide range of views and opinions. Ministers have held recent meetings with the Archbishop of Westminster and with Dignity in Dying during which issues including end-of-life issues were discussed.

Audiology Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what funding has been made available to each NHS trust to transfer patients from an analogue hearing aid to a digital hearing aid; (97438)

(2) what assessments she has made of increasing the use of registered hearing aid dispensers to improve access to digital hearing aids; and if she will make a statement.

From 2000 to 2005, funding of £125 million for the provision of digital hearing aids was ring-fenced through the modernising hearing aid services programme.

In 2005-06, funding for digital hearing aids was given to individual primary care trusts that had the authority to make decisions about the allocation of resources for audiology services according to the needs of the populations they serve.

In 2006-07, the Department allocated NHS central revenue budgets on 25 July 2006. This amounted to a total allocation of £5.5 billion across all the strategic health authorities and is the aggregate value of all the individual allocations from many different budgets, including audiology. It is the responsibility of SHAs to reach agreement with their local NHS trusts and PCTs over the allocation of these resources to best meet local need. In addition, capital allocations for audiology services in 2006-07 amounted to £26 million.

A partnership between the Department of Health, The Royal National Institute for the Deaf and the audiology professional bodies has developed a new four-year BSc (Hons) in audiology. This will help to address the national shortage of audiologists; currently there are 348 audiology students on eight BSc audiology courses.

The public-private partnership (PPP) is proving to be very successful and has recently been extended to March 2007. The latest data for October 2006 shows that about 50,000 patients have completed pathways through PPP. NHS trusts benefit from the increased capacity, competitive pricing and quality of service provision available through the PPP.

In order to provide digital hearing aids at an affordable cost to the NHS, contracts have been negotiated by the NHS Procurement and Supply Agency with certain manufacturers. NHS audiologists can choose from a range of aids on contract for different types and levels of hearing loss. This enables the NHS to treat more patients from the funds available.

Bowel Cancer

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people have been screened for bowel cancer under the national bowel cancer screening programme since its inception. (97032)

Over 6,900 people have been screened since the start of the national bowel cancer screening programme.

The bowel cancer screening programme is an ambitious project, and one of the first of its kind in Europe. When fully implemented, it will detect around 3,000 bowel cancers every year. We are committed to implementing this important programme.

Breast Cancer

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what her policy is on the screening of women aged 70 and above for breast cancer; and if she will make a statement. (97600)

There is currently insufficient evidence for inviting women aged over 70 for screening, but research is underway for the advisory committee on breast cancer screening. A final report is due in the next few weeks, and the committee will advise us on a way forward.

Women aged over 70 are offered three-yearly screening on request. Those who have already participated in the programme should be informed of this right after the age of 70.

We have collaborated with Age Concern to produce the leaflet, “Over 70? You are still entitled to breast screening”. The leaflet is widely available in general practitioner surgeries, health centres, breast screening units and Age Concern outlets.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps are taken (a) to identify women at genetic risk from breast cancer and (b) to raise awareness of the genetic risk of that cancer. (97731)

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published clinical guidance in May 2004 (updated October 2006 to reflect new evidence) on “The classification and care of women at risk of familial breast cancer in primary, secondary and tertiary care”. This provides clear guidance to health professionals on how to identify and manage patients who are, or are concerned that they may be, at increased risk of developing breast cancer because of their family history. The guidance has raised awareness among health professionals of the need to consider the possibility of genetic risk in women with a family history of the disease.

The Department is also currently jointly funding, with Macmillan Cancer Support, pilot services in seven sites, for people at risk of, or concerned about, familial cancer. The model offers a continuum of advice and care involving primary care, local cancer services and specialised genetic and cancer services to provide consistent management of individuals in the appropriate setting according to their level of risk. These aim to provide better, more patient-focused services for those concerned about their inherited risk of developing cancer by ensuring health care professionals along the patient pathway have relevant information to support and inform patients.

Cancer Drugs

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what guidance she has issued to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence on the use of (a) quality adjusted life year measures and (b) cost per life year gained when assessing cancer medicines. (98489)

[holding answer 1 November 2006]: No such guidance has been issued to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). NICE’s appraisal methods are set out in its methods guide published in April 2004 and available on NICE’s website at www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=201973.

As part of NICE’s normal business, its technology appraisal process and methodology is subject to periodic review which includes a public consultation. NICE’s appraisal process was last subject to such a review in 2003-04, and I understand that NICE will be undertaking a further scheduled review next year including a public consultation stage.

Chronic Disease

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment her Department has made of the merits of an NHS credit for patients with chronic diseases. (98093)

CIDP

To ask the Secretary of State forHealth what representations she has received from (a) patients and (b) other interested parties on the availability of intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradioculoneuropathy (CIDP); whether she intends to ask the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence to undertake a technology appraisal of intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of CIDP; what steps she is taking to ensure patientshave access to intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of CIDP; and if she will make a statement. (98640)

We have received one recent email from a Guillain-Barre syndrome support group regarding access to intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for those living with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP).

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence can undertake technology appraisals only for treatments licensed in the United Kingdom. Currently there are no intravenous immunoglobulin drugs licensed for the treatment of CIDP.

It is the responsibility of primary care trusts, working with local health professionals, to ensure all patients have access to the most suitable drugs and treatments for their disease. This may include the use of medications ‘off-licence’ if considered appropriate.

Clostridium Difficile

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what action her Department is taking to prevent the spread of clostridium difficile in (a) hospitals and (b) the community; what representations she has received from (i) members of the public and (ii) hon. Members on this issue; and if she will make a statement. (95115)

We are actively working with the national health service to help them improve control of clostridium difficile and have made it clear that this is an important public health issue.

In December 2005, the Chief Medical Officer and Chief Nursing Officer reminded the NHS of the importance of this infection, listed the key actions for its control and highlighted the guidance available. The current guidance is on the Health Protection Agency website at www.hp.org.uk and we have commissioned the HPA to review and update this national guidance. A new high impact intervention protocol on clostridium difficile disease was added to “Saving lives: a delivery programme to reduce healthcare associated infections including MRSA” in June 2006, and this tool will help the NHS reduce the number of infections. In addition, we will be introducing quarterly publication of mandatory clostridium difficile surveillance data as more rapid feedback of results will help performance.

However, controlling this infection requires appropriate management and clinical governance systems. This will be addressed by the code of practice for the prevention and control of health care associated infection developed under the Health Act 2006 which was published on 1 October 2006.

A range of correspondence from the public and hon. Members on this issue has been received.

Community Hospitals

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to her oral statement of 5 July 2006, Official Report, column 819, on community hospitals, how many community hospitals in the Thames Valley strategic health authority area are based in Victorian workhouse facilities. (91790)

Consanguinity

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what guidance she gives to general practitioners on the advice they offer to patients who are in an at risk category on the issue of consanguinity. (94280)

None. In general, guidance on issues of practice is a matter for the appropriate professional or regulatory bodies. In addition, local national health service organisations may decide to issue guidance to help practitioners deal with issues which are of particular relevance to their local population.

The Human Genetics Commission supports the need for proper provision of education and information about marriage within a kin-ship group. This should entail access to counselling and support, preferably in the individual’s or couple’s preferred language, and a no-blame approach that enables at-risk couples to come forward for testing. Those wanting specific advice on their individual risk should consult a clinical geneticist or genetic counsellor in their local NHS regional genetics centre.

From next year the curriculum for trainee general practitioners will include learning objectives to equip them to refer patients at risk of genetic conditions appropriately and to appreciate the importance of considering a patient’s cultural and religious background and beliefs concerning inheritance in providing care. These have been developed by the Royal College of General Practitioners in partnership with the NHS national genetics education and development centre, an initiative funded by the Department to identify health care practitioners’ genetics educational needs and encourage the integration of genetics into pre- and post- registration courses and continuing professional development.

Continuing Care

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) pursuant to the answer of 25 July 2006, Official Report, column 1209W, on continuing care, when she expects to publish (a) her Department's response to the consultation on the draft national framework for continuing care and (b) the final national framework for continuing care; (98620)

(2) whether all patients in receipt of NHS continuing care in those strategic health authorities which are operating multiple eligibility criteria will continue to be eligible for NHS continuing care after the SHA in which they are resident has amalgamated the criteria.

All strategic health authorities have recently reviewed their criteria to ensure their legal compliance. Therefore, where a SHA is operating multiple eligibility criteria the existing legal basis for the provision of NHS continuing health care will remain the same regardless of which criteria is used. We would not anticipate a change in an individual's eligibility following the merger of the SHAs as long as their assessed health care needs have not changed.

The public consultation on the national framework for NHS continuing health care closed on 22 September. We have had a large number of responses to the consultation which we are currently collating and analysing. We will publish our response as soon as this process is complete, and it will set out the timetable for implementation of the framework.

Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans she has to sign the 1997 Council of Europe Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. (97611)

The UK has not yet signedthe European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. The UK supported the development of the convention, but domestic policy on many of the issues in the convention has been developing rapidly since the convention was opened for signature in 1997 and it covers a wide range of complex ethical and legal issues where domestic policy is still to be resolved. These matters will need to be concluded before the Government are in a position to consider signing and ratifying the convention.

Dentistry

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many dental practices in the Shropshire Primary Care Trust area have (a) signed, (b) disputed and (c) refused to sign the new dental contracts. (95551)

Management information on the number of contracts signed, signed in dispute and rejected in Shropshire PCT area by 1 April 2006 shows that of the contracts offered, 64 were signed and eight rejected. Of the 64 contracts signed, 55 were signed in dispute. Three of these disputed contracts are now settled and discussions continue on the remaining contract. The information on disputes is updated through monthly reports and is available on the Department’s website on www.performance.doh.gov.uk/dental_contracts.

For Shropshire PCT, rejected contracts represent 11,256 units of dental activity. This was 2.6 per cent. of the total UDAs associated with all the contracts the PCT offered in April. The latest information shows that as at the end of August, the PCT had re-commissioned a total of 11,411 UDAs.

A contract may be for an individual dentist or a practice.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) adults and (b) children have been registered as NHS patients with dental practices in the Shropshire primary care trust area in each year since 1996. (95552)

The number of adults and children using general dental services and personal dental services registered within Shropshire County PCT during the period 31 March 1997 to 31 March 2006 is shown in the table.

Shropshire county PCT

Adults

Children

Total

1997

105,477

38,897

144,374

1998

88,612

39,178

127,790

1999

78,345

40,523

118,868

2000

77,408

40,622

118,030

2001

74,805

39,987

114,792

2002

79,565

40,748

120,313

2003

70,656

39,423

110,079

2004

77,263

40,998

118,261

2005

76,574

40,952

117,526

2006

90,688

43,243

133,931

Notes:

1. The postcode of the dental practice was used to allocate dentists to specific geographic areas. PCT and strategic health authority areas have been defined using the Office for National Statistics all fields postcode directory.

2. The data in this report are based on NHS dentists on PCT lists. These details were passed on to the Business Services Authority who paid dentists based on activity undertaken. A dentist can provide as little or as much NHS treatment as he or she chooses or has agreed with the PCT. In some cases, a NHS dentist may appear on a PCT list but not perform any NHS work in that period. Most NHS dentists do some private work. The data do not take into account the proportion of NHS work undertaken by dentists.

3. PDS schemes had varying registration periods. To ensure comparability with corresponding GDS data, PDS registrations are estimated using “proxy registrations”, namely the number of patients seen by PDS practices in the previous 15 months. PDS proxy registrations were not estimated for periods before September 2003—actual registrations were used before this date.

4. Data for 2003 and earlier do not include those PDS schemes that do not have any registrations, for example dental access centres, and is therefore not directly comparable with later data.

5. The boundaries used are as at 31 March 2006.

6. The latest information available for registration data covering the time series 31 March 1997 to 31 March 2006 has been published by The Information Centre for health and social care. “NHS Dental Activity and Workforce Report England: 31 March 2006” ISBN 1-84636-073-0.

Sources:

The Information Centre for health and social care NHS Business Services Authority.

The previous system of patient registration does not operate under the new regulations. Information will be available in due course via the NHS BSA on the numbers of patients who receive care or treatment from national health service primary care dentists on one or more occasions within a given period of time. This will provide a measure that is broadly similar to that of patient registration under the former system of GDS. We expect the first information to be available later in the year.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what mechanisms are in place for action against dentists who encourage patients to switch to private dental health insurance schemes without informing them of their entitlement to NHS treatment; (98334)

(2) what steps she is taking to ensure that patients are kept informed about their entitlement to treatment by an NHS dentist;

(3) if she will monitor the number of patients switching from NHS dentists to private dental health insurance schemes; and if she will ensure that those who do so are aware of their entitlement to NHS treatment.

If a dentist holds a national health service contract, misleading a patient about the range of treatments available is a breach of that contract. Where primary care trusts have evidence that a dentist has misled patients in this way there are a range of possible actions culminating potentially in termination of the dentist's NHS contract.

The General Dental Council's guidance “Maintaining Standards” requires dentists, whether providing NHS services or not, to make clear to patients the nature of the contract and in particular whether the patient is being accepted for private or NHS treatment. Non-compliance with these standards potentially puts a dentist's GDC registration at risk.

Information for patients about NHS treatment and eligibility is widely available. Local information is held by each PCT. Many also run help lines dedicated to advising callers on how to access NHS dental services locally. At national level, NHS Direct can give callers information on their nearest dental practice offering NHS treatment. Patients can also access this information on line at NHS.UK.

There are no plans to monitor the numbers of patients using private dental care. As with private medical care, this is a matter for the individual. However, access to NHS dental treatment is monitored. The first information following the reforms on the number of people accessing NHS dental services is expected to be available later this year.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which primary care trusts have refused to allow dentists operating under (a) the new general dental services contract and (b) the new personal dental services agreement to maintain children-only lists. (98639)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many missed dental appointments there were in (a) England and (b) each primary care trust area in each year since 1997. (98664)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many NHS dental patients were admitted under band 4 urgent treatment in each dental surgery in the greater Peterborough primary care partnership area in the 12 months prior to April 2006; how many have been so admitted since April 2006 in each case; and if she will make a statement. (99708)

The separate band for urgent courses of treatment is a feature of the new NHS dental contracts introduced on 1 April 2006 and data are therefore only available for the current financial year. Data are available at primary care trust level. The numbers of urgent courses of treatment so far reported and processed for the two Peterborough PCTs are shown in the following table.

Courses of treatment processed by treatment band, as at April to June 2006

Number

5AF

North Peterborough PCT

817

SAG

South Peterborough PCT

47

Total

864

Notes:

1. The postcode data of the dental practice division was used to allocate dentists to specific geographic areas. PCT areas have been defined using the Office for National Statistics all fields postcode directory.

2. The data in this report are based on NHS dentists listed on a contract between a PCT and provider. These details were passed on to the BSA who paid dentists based on activity undertaken. A dentist can provide as little or as much NHS treatment as he or she chooses or has agreed with the PCT. Most NHS dentists do some private work.

Sources:

The Information Centre for health and social care. NHS Business Services Authority.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what her policy is on NHS dentists advising patients that a clinically necessary treatment is not available under the NHS with a view to obtaining the agreement of a patient to have private treatment. (98289)

If a dentist holds a national health service contract, misleading a patient about the range of treatments available is a breach of that contract. Where primary care trusts have evidence that a dentist has misled patients in this way, there are a range of possible actions culminating potentially in termination of the dentist’s NHS contract.

The General Dental Council’s guidance “Maintaining Standards” requires dentists, whether providing NHS services or not, to make clear to patients the nature of the contract and in particular whether the patient is being accepted for private or NHS treatment. Non-compliance with these standards potentially puts a dentist’s GDC registration at risk.

Diabetes

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) adults and (b) children have been (i) diagnosed with and (ii) treated for diabetes in the last five years. (97041)

Information on the number of children and adults with diabetes is not available in the exact form requested. The following information is available for diagnosed diabetes.

Estimates of the number of people aged 16 and over with doctor-diagnosed diabetes is available from the annual health survey for england. The most reliable estimates are for 1998 and 2003 when the survey concentrated on cardiovascular disease and these are as follows:

People aged 16 and over with doctor-diagnosed diabetes in England

Number

1998

1,070,000

2003

1,550,000

The health survey for England estimated that in 2003, around 90 per cent. of those with doctor-diagnosed diabetes had type two diabetes1.

The number of patients diagnosed with diabetes identified by general practitioner practices in England in 2004-05 was 1.76 million people2. This is the first year of data from this source. Figures are not available for type one and type two diabetes separately.

The number of patients diagnosed with diabetes identified by GP practices in England in 2005-06 was 1.89 million people3. Figures are not available for type one and type two diabetes separately.

Information on all diagnoses count of finished consultant episodes for diabetes in national health service hospitals, England 1997-98 to 2004-05 is provided in the following table. It is difficult to accurately quantify hospital activity that is directly related to diabetes as all persons admitted with diabetes have it recorded in their diagnoses, irrespective of whether that was the reason for their admission. Conversely, a significant number of hospital admission may result from diabetes co-morbidity but never be recorded as diabetes related.

Sources:

1 Self-reported prevalence estimates published in 2003 health survey for England.

2 2004-05 quality and outcomes framework data published by the information centre for health and social care.

3 2005-06 quality and outcomes framework data published by the information centre for health and social care.

All diagnoses count of finished consultant episodes for diabetes NHS hospitals, England, 2000-01 to 2004-05

Adults (18+)

Children (<18)

Unknown

Total

2004-05

815,036

13,690

395

829,121

2003-04

717,060

13,131

517

730,708

2002-03

653,383

12,966

1,003

667,352

2001-02

572,477

12,162

1,132

585,771

2000-01

530,064

11,869

1,934

543,867

Source:

Hospital episode statistics, the information centre for health and social care

Disability Discrimination Act

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate she has made of how many and what proportion of NHS buildings comply with the Disability Discrimination Act 2005; and if she will make a statement. (94104)

Individual national health service organisations are responsible for making all the necessary arrangements to ensure compliance with the Disability Discrimination Act 2005.

No information on the compliance of NHS buildings with the Disability Discrimination Act 2005 is collected centrally.

Fluoridation

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what measures she has put in place to ensure accuracy in the information provided by the national fluoride information service. (97608)

The national fluoride information centre is an academically independent unit that provides objective information on all aspects of fluorides and fluoridation. It does not lobby in favour of or against water fluoridation. Based at the university of Manchester, all information it provides is derived from scientific literature and has been reviewed by independent scientific experts before being placed on its website. We are therefore confident of the accuracy of the information provided.

The centre also has an independent advisory board that reviews the NFIC’s activity. This board includes officers from the Department.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will consider a further study to update the data gained from the York study on fluoridation. (97609)

We do not consider that a further study is necessary to update the data gained from the York study on fluoridation. In the light of the findings of the York report, the Department commissioned the Medical Research Council to consider what further research was required to improve knowledge about fluoridation and health.

In 2002, the MRC published the report of its working group and since then a number of its research recommendations either have been completed or are currently being undertaken. In addition, the NFIC, in association with the oral health unit for England, is developing scientific protocols to monitor all aspects of water fluoridation through research following the York review guidelines.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) strategic health authorities, (b) primary care trusts and (c) other health bodies have contacted the Department giving notice that they are investigating the advantages of fluoridating their water supply; and if she will name each such body. (97610)

We are aware that North West strategic health authority and South Central SHA are currently exploring the feasibility of fluoridating water supplies in their areas in consultation with their local water undertakers.

Greater Manchester primary care trust and Southampton PCT have asked their respective SHAs to investigate the feasibility of fluoridating their water supplies.

General Dental Council

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what guidance she has issued to the General Dental Council on the conduct of consultation exercises; and what assessment she has made of the conduct of their consultation exercise on registration draft rules. (97486)

The GDC is independent of Government. The conduct of their consultation exercises is a matter for them, and not the Government.

General Healthcare Group

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the total value is of contracts her Department has held with General Healthcare Group Limited in each of the last five years. (94467)

The Department held a contract for orthopaedic procedures with BMI, a subsidiary of General Healthcare Group Limited, which ran from July 2005 to March 2006. The value of the contract was approximately £22 million.

Glucose Intolerance

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will take steps to ensure that rosiglitazone is freely available on the NHS to those who suffer from impaired glucose tolerance. (97303)

Rosiglitazone is licensed for the treatment of type two diabetes mellitus. It is not licensed for impaired glucose tolerance or for the prevention of diabetes.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published recommendations in 2003 on the use of glitazones for the treatment of type two diabetes. NICE is currently reviewing this guidance as part of a review of all of its type two diabetes guidance which is due to be published in February 2008.

Goats' Milk

To ask the Secretary of State for Health on what grounds the decision to prohibit the sale of goats’ milk infant formula was taken; and why the implementation of the prohibition was delayed until March 2007. (99367)

European Union and United Kingdom legislation does not allow goats’ milk proteins to be used in infant formula. We are working with businesses to ensure that products on the UK market comply with EU and UK legislation to an appropriate time scale.

GP Budgets

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether under general practitioner practice-based commissioning, GPs will be able to retain savings made against their budgets to be put towards patient services. (94001)

All practices will receive an indicative budget from the primary care trust, covering an agreed scope of health care services as partof the implementation plan for practice-based commissioning. Practices that under spend against their indicative budget will have access to the resources freed up. For 2006-07 we have recommended that individual practices should be entitled to access and redirect at least 70 per cent. of any freed-up resource.

Health Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the expenditure per head of population was in the constituency of Hastings and Rye in (a) 1996-97 and (b) 2006-07. (92758)

Expenditure data are not normally available at constituency level as this rarely coincides with the boundaries of individual health bodies. Data at individual health body level are retained for seven years and therefore data for 1996-97 are not now available. Expenditure per head is derived from historical audited accounts, therefore, data are not available for 2006-07.

The figures for 1997-98 and 2004-05 for Surrey and Sussex strategic health authority are shown in the table.

Expenditure per head in Surrey and Sussex SHA area (£)

1997-98

618.46

2004-05

1,181.31

Health Protection Agency

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what discussions she has had with the Health Protection Agency on (a) the use of air cleaning technology and (b) other measures to reduce hospital acquired infections. (95412)

The rapid review panel was convened by the HPA at the request of the Department of Health. The panel provides assessment of new and novel equipment, materials and other products or protocols that may be of value to the national health service in improving hospital infection control and reducing health care associated infections (HCAIs). This includes air decontamination products.

To date the panel has published 170 reports on its website at hwww.hpa.org.uk/infections/topics_az/rapid_review/new_reports.htm 24 of these are on air decontamination products. However, there is little evidence to show that air plays a significant role in the transmission of most HCAIs.

The Department works closely with the HPA through not just the RRP, and the HPA is actively involved in our comprehensive programme to combat HCAIs.

Health Statistics (Hartlepool/Tees Valley)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what percentage of eligible women in (a) Hartlepool constituency and (b) the Tees Valley sub-region had (i) breast cancer and (ii) cervical cancer screening procedures in each of the last 10 years; (95361)

(2) how many women from the top decile of deprived wards in (a) Hartlepool constituency and (b) the Tees Valley sub-region did not take up the offer of screening for (i) breast cancer and (ii) cervical cancer in each of the last five years; and if she will make a statement.

The available information requested is in the table:

Percentage

Hartlepool primary care trust

County Durham and Tees Valley strategic health authority1

Breast screening coverage2

Cervical screening coverage3

Breast screening coverage

Cervical screening coverage

1995-96

n/a

n/a

69.1

89.5

1996-97

n/a

n/a

67.2

88.9

1997-98

n/a

n/a

66.2

88.9

1998-99

n/a

n/a

68.7

85.9

1999-2000

n/a

n/a

72.8

85.3

2000-01

n/a

n/a

72.7

88.9

2001-02

77.2

81.3

78.4

82.8

2002-03

56.4

80.8

73.0

82.1

2003-04

76.1

80.2

69.4

81.5

2004-05

54.8

79.3

73.7

80.8

1 Tees Health Authority from 1995-96 to 2000-01.

2 Breast screening coverage is the proportion of women resident who have had a test result at least once in the previous three years.

3 Cervical screening coverage is the percentage of women in a population eligible for screening at a given point in time whose last test producing an adequate result was less than five years ago.

Source:

Statistical Bulletin: Cervical Screening Programme, England: 1995-96 to 2004-05 and Statistical Bulletin: Breast Screening Programme, England: 1995-96 to 2004-05

Statistics on how many women from the top decile of deprived wards in Hartlepool and the Tees Valley who undertook breast and cervical screening are not held centrally.

Healthcare-related Infections

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what her most recent estimate is of (a) MRSA and (b) clostridium difficile rates per 1,000 bed days in NHS hospitals (i) in England and (ii) broken down by NHS trust. (94986)

The latest data were published by the Health Protection Agency in July 20061. The overall rate of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemias in England for October 2005 to March 2006 was 0.17 per 1,000 bed days, and was unchanged from the rate for April to September 20051.

The data for each acute NHS trust in England for each six-month period from April 2001 to March 2006 are also published2.

Rates of Clostridium difficile associated disease in people aged over 65 years were also published in July1 and the overall rate for England in 2005 was 0.22 per 1,000 bed days.

The rates for each acute NHS trust in England were also published3.

Sources:

1 Mandatory surveillance of health care associated infections report 2006:

www.hpa.org.uk/infections/topics_az/hai/mandatory_report_2006.htm

2 MRSA bacteraemia six-monthly data April 2001 to March 2006:

www.hpa.org.uk/infections/topics_az/hai/MRSA_for_pririt.xls

3 Clostridium difficile yearly data January 2004 to December 2005:

www.hpa.org.uk/infections/topics_az/hai/Clostridium_difficile_for_print.xls

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate she has made of the annual financial cost of hospital acquired infections. (95413)

This data is not available. A commonly used estimate is that hospital acquired infections cost the NHS £1 billion a year1.

Source:

1 R. Plowman, N. Graves, M. Griffin, J. A. Roberts, A. V. Swan, B. Cookson, L. Taylor. “The socio-economic burden of hospital acquired infection”. Public Health Laboratory Service 1999.

Hospital Chaplains

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what her policy is on the employment of hospital chaplains in NHS hospitals; and what guidance her Department offers to local NHS trusts on the role of hospital chaplains; (92450)

(2) if she will examine the proposals to reduce the chaplaincy service at the Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS trust; and if she make an assessment of their impact on the work of the trust and its service to patients and their families.

The Department is committed to the principle of ensuring that patients and staff in the NHS have access to spiritual care, whatever faith or belief system they follow.

NHS trusts are responsible for delivering religious and spiritual care in a way that meets the diverse needs of their patients. Issues concerning staffing chaplaincy services in hospital are a matter for local determination. However, we expect NHS trusts to adhere to guidance “NHS Chaplaincy: Meeting the Religious and Spiritual Needs of Patients and Staff”.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when she expects to answer questions 92450 and 92451, on hospital chaplaincy, tabled by the hon. Member for Mid Worcestershire on 6 October. (99502)

Human Genetics Commission

To ask the Secretary of State for Health who the Chairman of the Human Genetics Commission is; what relevant specialist qualifications he or she holds; what his or her career has been to date; where the post was advertised; how many persons applied for the post; how many were short listed for interview; and if she will make a statement. (97867)

The current chair of the Human Genetics Commission is Baroness Helena Kennedy QC. Baroness Kennedy is a practicing barrister and broadcaster, whose work has included a focus on civil liberties and wider ethical and legal issues. She has a high public profile together with considerable experience in chairing advisory committees and producing reports on sensitive issues. A full register of Baroness Kennedy’s interests can be found at www.hgc.gov.uk.

Advertisements inviting applications for Human Genetics Commission membership and chair posts were placed in the national press in 1999. Seven applications for chair were received and three candidates were shortlisted for interview.

Kernicterus

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether an understanding of Kernicterus forms part of the (a) pre-qualification training of and (b) annual post qualification refresher courses for midwives. (96100)

The content and standard of training for midwives is a matter for the Nursing and Midwifery Council and relevant higher education institution in collaboration with the Royal College of Midwives and other stakeholders. The Department does not provide direction on the content of these courses.

Midwives are obliged to undertake continuing professional development, and are required to declare they have met the Nursing and Midwifery Council's continuing professional development standard on a three-yearly basis in order to maintain their registration.

Local Involvement Networks

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether local involvement networks will have the formal power to refer their concerns to (a) the local primary care trust, (b) the local overview and scrutiny committee, (c) the health service regulator, (d) her and (e) any other body. (99549)

Details of the powers we proposed to give to local involvement networks are being finalised following the responses we received to “A stronger local voice”, and will be published shortly.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether local involvement networks will monitor and inspect (a) the delivery of NHS services and (b) the structure of the market in healthcare. (99550)

One of the roles of local involvement networks (LINks) will be to monitor the commissioning and provision of national health service services. We are currently considering what powers LINks will need to enable them to fulfil this role.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether patient forums will continue to exist following (a) the abolition of the Commission for Patient and Public Involvement in Health and (b) the establishment of local involvement networks. (99551)

It is our intention, subject to the passage of primary legislation, that patients forums will not continue to exist following the abolition of the Commission for Patient and Public Involvement in Health and the establishment of local involvement networks.

Macular Degeneration

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what treatments are provided by the NHS for age-related neovascular macular degeneration. (98846)

All primary care trusts are funding photodynamic therapy treatment for patients with both the wholly classic and predominantly classic forms of age-related macular degeneration.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is currently carrying out an appraisal of Lucentis and Macugen for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration and final guidance is due to be published in August 2007. However, NICE will only publish appraisal guidance on Lucentis if it receives a licence from the European Medicines Agency.

Where guidance from NICE is not yet available, PCTs are expected to apply local arrangements for the managed introduction of new technologies. These arrangements should include an assessment of the available evidence.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people are being treated for wet age-related macular degeneration in each health authority area in England. (97370)

Those diagnosed with macular disease and treated as in-patients are shown in the table. The table shows the number of in-patient admissions during 2004-05 to national health service hospitals in England for those whose primary diagnosis was degeneration of the macular and posterior pole.

The data has been produced by former strategic health authority area and reflects NHS hospitals in the area. The numbers do not reflect residents of any one area but will include cross boundary referrals, depending on specialised services commissioning arrangements for each area.

SHA of treatment

Number of patients

Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire

168

Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire

16

Essex

59

North West London

18

North Central London

317

North East London

21

South East London

66

South West London

*

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear

54

County Durham and Tees Valley

39

North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire

69

West Yorkshire

140

Cumbria and Lancashire

103

Greater Manchester

150

Cheshire and Merseyside

209

Thames Valley

244

Hampshire and Isle of Wight

139

Kent and Medway

40

Surrey and Sussex

336

Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire

376

South West Peninsula

176

Dorset and Somerset

319

South Yorkshire

46

Trent

187

Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland

29

Shropshire and Staffordshire

284

Birmingham and the Black Country

174

West Midlands South

33

Note:

Due to reasons of confidentiality, figures between 1 and 5 have been suppressed and replaced with “*” (an asterisk).

Source:

Hospital Episode Statistics, The Information Centre for health and social care

Medical Careers

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what consideration her Department has given to deferring the introduction of the modernising medical careers programme; and if she will make a statement. (97043)

We are aware of the views expressed in the media to defer implementation of MMC, a major initiative aimed to improve both patient care and doctor's training. For this reason, it is subject to significant governance processes involving both the Department and the national health service. Although it represents a challenging agenda of work the four United Kingdom health Departments believe that MMC is proceeding satisfactorily and do not consider it necessary to delay it. Deferral now could significantly disadvantage some doctors in training.

Medical Staff Employment Rates

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the percentage employment rate was of newly qualified (a) nurses, (b) physiotherapists and (c) doctors in the latest period for which figures are available; and if she will make a statement. (94595)

Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will make a statement on the operation of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency’s national rules scheme for homeopathic medicines. (95235)

The national rules scheme for homeopathic products was launched on 1 September 2006. It complements current arrangements for the authorisation of homeopathic products used for minor symptoms or conditions within the tradition of homeopathy practised in the United Kingdom.

Before the introduction of the new scheme, homeopathic products either held product licences of right (PLRs) or were registered under a simplified scheme. PLR licences were issued to all medicinal products on the market at the time that the Medicines Act 1968 was implemented in 1971. Homeopathic PLRs are allowed to carry descriptions of the symptom or condition that the product is used to treat, called indications. In 1992 European Union legislation introduced a simplified scheme for homeopathic products, so-called because the safety and quality of products have to be demonstrated, but there is no requirement to demonstrate efficacy. The simplified scheme is restricted to products for oral and external use and does not allow indications.

Products authorised under the new national rules scheme will comply with all the requirements placed on conventional medicines, with the exception of those relating to preclinical tests and clinical trials. This will enhance the information available to consumers on homeopathic products authorised under the new scheme while continuing to ensure their safety and quality. The new scheme will also enable products to carry indications for minor symptoms or conditions. In addition, over the next seven years the homeopathic PLRs will be reviewed.

Mesothelioma

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what information she collects on local prescribing patterns for alimta pemetrexed within the national health service. (98313)

The Department does not collect data on hospital prescribing centrally. Data are available to the Department from a commercial company about drugs issued in hospitals.

Full details of the use of Pemetrexed disodium (Alimta) by Strategic health authority cannot be provided under the terms of the agreement with IMS who provide the Department with hospital data.

Methylphenidate

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 26 October 2006, Official Report, column 2093W, on methylphenidate, if she will request that the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency take account of the (a) work and (b) recommendations of the US Food and Drug Administration on methylphenidate. (99671)

Methylphenidate is a stimulant drug that is authorised in children over six years of age as part of a comprehensive treatment programme for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Treatment should be under the supervision of a specialist in childhood behavioural disorders. Its safety is closely monitored by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency in conjunction with other European regulatory authorities.

Stimulants such as methylphenidate are recognised to cause cardiovascular adverse effects such as tachycardia or palpitations, (increased or fast heart rate), arrhythmias (abnormal heart rhythm), changes in blood pressure (usually increased) and angina. There are warnings about these potential risks in the United Kingdom product information for methylphenidate, which also states that these products should not be used in patients with certain heart conditions.

Concerns have arisen about the risk of serious cardiovascular events (including sudden deaths) in association with stimulant treatment in children and adolescents with structural heart defects. Although it is recognised that some serious heart conditions alone carry an increased risk of sudden death, in the United States the Food and Drug Administration has requested that the product information for stimulant medications, including methylphenidate, be amended to reflect this risk and to advise that they should not be used in those with known serious structural cardiac abnormalities and also to strengthen warnings about the risk of other cardiovascular adverse effects.

The MHRA, with other European regulatory authorities, has also carefully evaluated the available data relating to the reports of sudden death in children with structural heart defects and taken into account the work of the United States FDA. As a result of these Europe-wide discussions, the product information for methylphenidate is being updated accordingly to advise about serious cardiovascular adverse effects and to recommend that methylphenidate should not be used in children or adolescents with known serious structural cardiac abnormalities. This will result in alignment of UK and European recommendations with those of the FDA.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will issue guidance to primary care trusts and GP practices that methylphenidate should not be prescribed for children less than six years old. (99716)

Methylphenidate is only authorised for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children aged six years and over and should only be initiated by or under the supervision of a specialist in childhood behavioural disorders. These restrictions on its use are clearly stated in the summary of product characteristics, which provides prescribing guidance to health care professional, and are also reflected in the British national formulary for children which is distributed on behalf of the Department to all general practices.

Mobile Phones

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what safety assessment her Department has (a) conducted and (b) evaluated into potential interference with sensitive medical equipment caused by mobile phone use in hospitals. (95893)

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) published a detailed study on the effects of mobile phones and other communication equipment on a range of medical devices in its device bulletin DB9702 “Electromagnetic Compatibility of Medical Devices with Mobile Communications”, in March 1997—the Medical Devices Agency at that time.

The advice in the publication DB 9702 has been reviewed on a regular basis by the MHRA since 1997.

A further bulletin, DB 1999(02) “Emergency Service Radios and Mobile Data Terminal: Compatibility Problems with Medical Devices” was published in May 1999, and addressed the impact of radio communications on the safe use of a range of medical devices.

An update document, SN 2001(06), was published in March 2001, which covered the potential interference with medical devices by TETRA radio systems employed by the emergency services and media broadcasts from hospital premises.

In July 2004 guidance on the MHRA website, which referenced DB 9702 and DB 1999(02), advised that health-care providers should actively manage the use of radio frequency spectrum on their own sites, and consider the potential effects of communication equipment on all medical devices.

The most recent MHRA website advice published is “Frequently asked questions on the use of mobile phones in hospitals”. This has links to the other MHRA publications on the effects of mobile phones on medical equipment.

MHRA's advice is that each hospital trust should conduct its own risk assessment and introduce the necessary controls to protect areas such as intensive treatment units where sensitive equipment is in use. Areas that are generally accessible to members of the public may be suitable for the unrestricted use of mobile phones, and signage should make this clear.

MRSA

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what (a) steps she has taken and (b) funds she has allocated to tackle MRSA. (96290)

Tackling methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a priority for Government and the NHS. We have set a target to halve the number of MRSA bloodstream infections by 2008 and each acute trust has its own target. The Department and its partner organisations have developed a range of mutually reinforcing activities that ensure combating the spread of MRSA is embedded in everyday procedures and policies, in particular:

all acute trusts are signed-up to the “Saving Lives” package of best practice which, if implemented in full, should combat MRSA spread in the acute sector. It is supplemented by the “Essential Steps” initiative, designed for non-acute care settings;

mandatory MRSA surveillance, which continues to be developed/enhanced;

the first ever national hand hygiene programme for hospital staff, “cleanyourhands”, has progressed to its second year;

a statutory code of practice which requires national health service bodies to have appropriate management and clinical governance systems in place to deliver effective infection control came into force on 1 October; and

advice on screening patients at risk is about to be published.

Additionally, tailored support is available for those trusts in the most challenging positions. Improvement teams will during 2006-07, work with about 50 trusts, so as to help identify those issues that prevent reduction in infections at the local level, and help them develop action plans to speed up and sustain progress.

The Department does not allocate specific funds to the NHS to tackle MRSA, as this is part of the NHS's mainstream activity. The MRSA/cleaner hospitals programme, which co-ordinates and resources actions and joint working aimed at delivering the target, including the provision of tailored support, spent £1,300,000 in 2005-06 and has been allocated £2,780,000 this year.

Myeloma

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether Velcade may be prescribed to those with myeloma; what representations she has received from users of this drug; and if she will make a statement. (97509)

From 1 October 2005 to 25 October 2006, the Department has received 992 letters and emails about Velcade from users of this drug and other interested parties. It would be possible to identify the exact number from users only at disproportionate cost. We have also received two petitions about this drug.

It is for clinicians, in discussion with patients, to determine treatments for a patient's condition. Treatments that have been positively appraised by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) must be funded by primary care trusts within three months of publication of guidance, if the patient concerned is eligible.

Where NICE guidance is not available, PCTs should continue with local arrangements for the managed introduction of new technologies. These arrangements should involve an assessment of the available evidence for the technology in question. Funding for such treatments should not be withheld simply because guidance from NICE is not available.

National Carers Strategy

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what progress has been made in reviewing the national strategy for carers as set out in the White Paper “Our Health, Our Care, Our Say”; and if she will make a statement. (98131)

A number of commitments to improve support for carers were set out in the White Paper “Our Health, Our Care, Our Say” which are currently being discussed with national carers' organisations. Work will begin shortly to plan how best to take forward the commitment to update and extend the Prime Minister's strategy for carers, published in 1999.

Formal discussions have not yet been commenced with other relevant Government Departments but we will be involving them closely in the revision of the strategy along with other key stakeholders.

National Voices Project

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether it will be one of the main functions of the national voice for patients being considered by the national voices project to represent the views and concerns of local involvement networks at a national level. (99548)

Baroness Morgan of Drefelin is leading work by a number of national patient organisations to develop national voices. In their recent publication, “Are you being heard?”, they stated that the project’s basic function is to provide a mechanism for existing voices to come together for greater effect on policymaking at national level. The publication also states membership will be open to national organisations in the first instance but could perhaps open up to local organisation and individuals in the future.

NHS (Hertfordshire)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many NHS posts she expects to be lost in North East Hertfordshire in the next 12 months. (96484)

NHS Consultation

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what her Department's policy is in respect of strategic health authority and NHS trust consultation with (a) NHS unions, (b) the general work force, (c) patients' groups and (d) the wider public before services are transferred from one hospital to another. (95364)

Section 11 of the Health and Social Care Act 2001 requires all NHS bodies to involve and consult patients and the public in decisions affecting the operation of services. NHS organisations are also required to consult local authority overview and scrutiny committees on any proposals that represent a substantial service change.

Individual employing organisations are required under employment legislation to inform and consult staff and staff/union representatives on various issues affecting their own organisations. Each NHS organisation will have its own locally agreed consultation procedures.

NHS Finances

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the NHS non-administrative staff budget was in (a) 1995 and (b) 2005. (94907)

The table shows the total expenditure on non-administrative staff by NHS bodies in England in 1994-95 and 2004-05 in cash and real terms.

NHS (England) non-administrative staff expenditure

£ million

In cash terms

In real terms (at 2004-05 prices)

1994-95

12,666

16,296

2004-05

26,562

26,562

Notes:

2004-05 data does not include information relating to NHS foundation trusts.

Figures are the total staff costs less the administrative and clerical staff costs reported in annual financial returns.

Source:

Financial returns of health authorities, strategic health authorities, primary care trusts and NHS trusts. HM Treasury gross domestic product deflator.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what changes have been made to the system of NHS resource allocation since 1997. (94990)

NHS resource allocation is based on the principle of weighted capitation, whereby resources are distributed between areas on the basis of the relative needs of their populations. Since 1997 there have been changes to:

the areas to which resources are allocated;

the frequency of allocations;

the range of services covered;

the population base; and

the weighted capitation formula which informs these allocations.

The changes are set out in the “Resource Allocation: weighted capitation formula” booklets (editions 2-5) which are available in the Library.

Copies of editions 3-5 can be found on the Department’s website at www.dh.gov.uk/allocations

NHS Operations

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many NHS operations were cancelled in Suffolk due to (a) administrative errors, (b) lack of beds, (c) outbreaks of MRSA or other infections, (d) the lack of correct or clean equipment and (e) missing notes in each year since 1997. (95463)

The information is not held in the format requested. The Department collects data on the number of operations cancelled at the last minute for non-clinical reasons. The following tables show data for the number of operations cancelled at the last minute for non-clinical reasons for acute trusts in the Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire areas for the period 2002-03 to 2005-06.

Cancelled operations for non-clinical reasons, NHS organisations in England, 2002-03 to 2005-06

2002-03

2003-04

Number of last minute cancellations for non-clinical reasons

Number of patients not admitted within 28 days of cancellation on the day of surgery

Number of last minute cancellations for non-clinical reasons

Number of patients not treated within 28 days of last minute cancellation

Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire SHA

2,995

526

3,350

383

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

645

189

769

209

Hinchingbrooke Health Care NHS Trust

179

65

180

17

Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust

417

130

488

38

James Paget Healthcare NHS Trust

176

28

258

5

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust

662

2

569

25

Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

185

1

166

8

Peterborough and Stamford NHS Foundation Trust

253

32

187

0

The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King’s Lynn NHS Trust

284

76

308

79

West Suffolk Hospitals NHS Trust

194

3

425

2

2004-052005-06

Number of last minute cancellations for non-clinical reasons

Number of patients not treated within 28 days of last minute cancellation

Number of last minute cancellations for non-clinical reasons

Number of patients not treated within 28 days of last minute cancellation

Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire SHA

3,859

505

2,545

208

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

1,090

382

507

95

Hinchingbrooke Health Care NHS Trust

168

21

138

2

Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust

533

1

384

24

James Paget Healthcare NHS Trust

267

3

226

10

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust

492

24

327

16

Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

159

8

154

5

Peterborough and Stamford NHS Foundation Trust

270

8

298

1

The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King’s Lynn NHS Trust

295

58

236

55

West Suffolk Hospitals NHS Trust

585

0

275

0

Note:

In 2002-03 the number of patients not admitted within 28 days of cancellation on the day of surgery was collected. From 2003-04 onwards, the number of patients not admitted within 28 days of a last minute cancellation was collected.

Source:

Department of Health dataset QMCO.

NHS Pensions

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the annual savings would be from increasing the employee contribution rate of the NHS pension scheme by 1 per cent.; and if she will make a statement. (93547)

The annual savings to the Exchequer if the employee contribution rate had been increased by 1 per cent in the period 1 April 2005 to 31 March 2006, would have been around £310 million. Under the joint proposals from NHS employers and the NHS trade unions, which are under consultation until 30 November, it has been agreed that there will be a cap on employer contributions.

NHS Redundancies

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate she has made of the number of compulsory redundancies in each (a) trust and (b) NHS body making such redundancies in each of the next 12 months. (99972)

NHS Services (Hertfordshire)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the recruitment and retention of health visitors in Hertfordshire. (96461)

No assessment has been made centrally as to the recruitment and retention of health visitors in Hertfordshire, as responsibility falls to local national health service organisations to ensure that they have sufficient staff to ensure that the services that they provide meet the needs of the local populations that they serve.

NHS Training Budgets

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much each health authority will spend in 2006-07 on (a) continuing professional development and (b) professional enhancement; and what their planned spending is in each of these areas over the next three years. (95669)

Continuing professional development needs for national health service staff are determined against local NHS priorities, through appraisal processes and training needs analyses informed by local delivery plans, regulatory bodies’ requirements and the needs of the service.

Access to training is affected by a number of local factors and it would not be practical for the centre to be prescriptive on these.

NICE

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans she has to review the (a) remit and (b) scope of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence to ensure that they are able adequately to assess the wider benefits to society across (i) health, (ii) social care, (iii) carers and (iv) families; and if she will make a statement. (97819)

The Department has no plans to review the remit and scope of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE explicitly takes account of publicly funded health and personal social services costs in its appraisals, and also takes account of factors such as benefits to carers where it is appropriate to do so.

As part of NICE’s normal business, its technology appraisal process and methodology is subject to periodic review which includes a public consultation. NICE’s appraisal process was last subject to such a review in 2003-04, and I understand that NICE will be undertaking a further scheduled review next year including a public consultation stage.

Ovarian Cancer

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer in the Calderdale primary care trust in each of the last 10 years; and at which stage of cancer the diagnosis was made in each case. (98068)

I have been asked to reply.

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Colin Mowl, dated 6 November 2006:

The National Statistician has been asked to reply to your recent parliamentary question asking how many women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer in the Calderdale Primary Care Trust in each of the last 10 years; and at which stage of cancer the diagnosis was made in each case. I am replying in her absence. [98068]

The latest available figures for newly diagnosed cases of cancer (incidence) are for the year 2004. Numbers of cases of ovarian cancer for the years 1995 to 2004 for Calderdale Primary Care Trust (PCT) are given in table 1 .

Stage at diagnosis was introduced in 1993 when the cancer registration minimum data set was established by the Department of Health. There remains much variation in the recording of stage by the regional cancer registries.

Available information for Calderdale Primary Care Trust (PCT) on the numbers of cases of ovarian cancer by stage of diagnosis for the years 1995 to 2004 are given in table 2 .

Table 1: Number of newly diagnosed cases of ovarian cancer1 for Calderdale PCT, 1995-2004

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

1997-2004

Calderdale PCT

20

23

21

17

25

16

30

15

15

16

198

1 Ovarian cancer is defined as code C56 in the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD 10). Source: Office for National Statistics.

Table 2: Number of newly diagnosed cases of ovarian cancer1 by tumour stage2 for Calderdale PCT, 1995-2004

Tumour stage

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

1995-2004

I A

0

1

1

1

0

2

1

2

0

0

8

1C

0

3

0

1

1

0

3

2

2

2

14

2A

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

2B

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

2C

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

2

3C

1

2

0

1

5

3

8

2

0

3

25

3

2

2

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

4

0

0

0

0

2

2

3

1

2

2

12

No tumour staging recorded

17

15

20

11

15

9

15

8

10

9

129

No tumour staging recorded (percentage)

85

65

95

65

60

56

50

53

67

56

65

1 Ovarian cancer is defined as code C56 in the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD 10).

2 Tumour staging of ovarian cancer using the FIGO staging method as defined in the Staging Classifications and Clinical Practice Guidelines of Gynaecological Cancers, Second Edition.

Source:

Department of Health, Northern and Yorkshire Cancer Registry and Information Service

Peterborough and Stamford Trust

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what the cost to the public purse has been of private sector consultants engaged by Peterborough and Stamford hospitals NHS foundation trust to ameliorate that trust’s financial deficit since1 April 2005; and if she will make a statement; (96883)

(2) what resources have been made available for bereavement counselling in 2006-07 in the Peterborough and Stamford hospitals NHS foundation trust area; and if she will make a statement.

These are matters for the chair of Peterborough and Stamford hospitals NHS foundation trust, Dr. Clive Morton OBE. I have written to Dr. Morton informing him of your inquiries. He will reply shortly and a copy of the letter will be placed in the Library.

PFI

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 26 October 2006, Official Report, column 2099W, on the private finance initiative, what outstanding issues of (a) affordability and (b) capacity are preventing a decision on the private finance initiative review by the Treasury of Peterborough and Stamford hospitals NHS foundation trust scheme from being more swiftly expedited; and if she will make a statement. (99413)

The East of England strategic health authority are now considering the full business case for the Peterborough and Stamford NHS Foundation Trust private finance initiative scheme. It is expected that the FBC will be available for the Department to review by the end of the year. Production of an FBC is in the normal course of business and is a step that must be taken by all trusts with PFI schemes in order to transparently demonstrate, among other aspects, that the capacity and affordability assumptions underpinning a scheme are robust. The particular concerns that the FBC will need to address are that the future income generation assumptions from the release of assets consequent on the scheme are sound, and that bed number assumptions are compatible with the economy wide capacity planning being undertaken by the SHA.

Physiotherapists

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many new NHS jobs have been created in physiotherapy in (a) Liverpool, (b) Wirral and (c) Cheshire in each of the last five years. (94894)

The information is not available in the format requested. The table shows the number of qualified physiotherapy staff working in the former Cheshire and Merseyside strategic health authority area.

National health service hospital and community health services: qualified physiotherapy staff as at 30 September 2001 to 2005

Headcount

2001

901

2002

915

2003

942

2004

1,027

2005

1,112

Notes: The Information Centre for health and social care, non-medical workforce census

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what (a) research she has carried out and (b) assessment she has made of the effect of agenda for change on job and career progression opportunities for graduate and junior physiotherapists. (94895)

The national health service staff council has the responsibility for monitoring the implementation of agenda for change and the effects on NHS staff. This is carried out through its sub groups which include an equality and diversity group, job evaluation consistency checking group and the knowledge and skills framework group. The Department has carried out no separate research in this area.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how many physiotherapist posts there are in the NHS; and what estimate she has made of the number of posts which will be available to new graduate physiotherapists in each of the next three years; (95661)

(2) how many physiotherapists graduated in each of the last five years; and how many physiotherapist (a) posts and (b) vacancies there were in the NHS in each year.

Information on the numberof physiotherapist posts, and the number of physiotherapists who have graduated each year is not collected centrally.

The three-month vacancy rate, vacancy number and the number of physiotherapy staff for 2006 and in each of the last five years are shown in the following table.

Information Centre for Health and Social Care vacancies survey—Three month vacancy rates, number and staff in post for qualified physiotherapy staff in EnglandPercentage of three month vacancy rateNumber of three month vacancy Number of staff in post (whole-time equivalent)1Number of staff in post (headcount)120015.065512,51515,60820025.271512,99216,21220034.767113,58616,88520044.162614,45517,92220052.946415,56419,13920061.118316,29119,997 1 Staff in post data is from the non-medical workforce census as at 30 September previous to the specified year. Notes:1. Vacancy data is from the vacancy survey each specified year. 2. Three month vacancy information is as at 31 March each specified year. 3. Three month vacancies are vacancies which trusts are actively trying to fill, which had lasted for three months or more (full time equivalents). 4. Three month vacancy rates are three month vacancies expressed as a percentage of three month vacancies plus staff in post. 5. Three month vacancy rates are calculated using staff in post from the non-medical workforce census 6. Percentages are rounded to one decimal place. 7. Vacancy and staff in post numbers are rounded to the nearest whole number. Source: The Information Centre for Health and Social Care Vacancies Survey The Information Centre for Health and Social Care Non-Medical Workforce Census

Radiotherapy

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what research has been (a) commissioned and (b) evaluated into radiotherapy damage as a result of radiotherapy treatment. (94928)

No recent research has been directly commissioned or evaluated by the Department. Research continues in this field to improve cure rates and minimise normal tissue complications. Contributors in the United Kingdom to such continuing research include the National Cancer Research Institute, Medical Research Council, Cancer Research UK and the Academic Clinical Oncology Radiotherapy Research Network. Patient safety is a priority for the Department and the national health service.

Severance Packages

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what guidance her Department has issued to NHS trusts on the publication of the details of severance packages for chief executives. (95885)

Guidance on the publication of remuneration details of senior national health service staff, including chief executives, is included under chapter 2 “Annual Report of the NHS Finance Manual” which is available on the Department's website at: www.info.doh.gov.uk/doh/finman.nsf

Sleep Apnoea

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether she has issued guidance to NHS trusts about their potential liability relating to decisions not to provide continuous positive airways pressure equipment to those patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnoea; and if she will make a statement. (97388)

No. It is for the NHS locally to commission services for the people they serve, informed by clinical judgment of the actual needs and any advice they have from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). NICE has not yet completed its consideration of continuous positive airway pressure for people with sleep apnoea.

Staffordshire Ambulance Service

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment the Prime Minister has made of the recent removal of (a) ResQPOD heart resuscitation equipment from Staffordshire ambulances and (b) emergency response medicines from Staffordshire ambulance first responders; and if she will make a statement. (95898)

Stockport NHS Foundation Trust

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate she has made of the likely outturn expenditure against plans of Stockport NHS Foundation Trust for 2006-07. (94100)

I am advised by the chairman of Monitor (whose statutory name is the Independent Regulator of NHS Foundation Trusts) that Stockport NHS foundation trust has forecast in its annual plan that it will achieve break-even in 2006-07. In the first quarter of 2006-07, the trust was on track to achieve the planned full year out-turn. Both the trust’s annual plan and the quarterly monitoring results for the foundation trust sector are publicly available on Monitor’s website at www.monitor-nhsft.gov.uk.

Strategic Health Authorities

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the impact of recent changes to the training budgets managed by strategic health authorities. (94600)

Some strategic health authorities have not yet finalised their education and training budgets following the issue of overall allocations to them in July. We will analyse the outcome of their expenditure in due course.

Strokes

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people have had strokes in (a) England and (b) the East Midlands in the last 10 years. (96995)

The information requested is shown in the table.

Finished consultant episodes of strokes in England and East Midlands: national health service hospitals, England, 1995-96 to 2004-05

Total number

England

1995-96

110,177

1996-97

116,016

1997-98

124,849

1998-99

130,129

1999-2000

131,139

2000-01

130,217

2001-02

136,474

2002-03

148,237

2003-04

150,899

2004-05

154,805

East Midlands

1995-96

1

1996-97

12,621

1997-98

13,445

1998-99

15,915

1999-2000

16,161

2000-01

16,001

2001-02

16,174

2002-03

16,856

2003-04

17,541

2004-05

17,295

1 Data not available as not mapped by region prior to 1996-97. Notes: 1. Finished consultant episode (FCE) An FCE is defined as a period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one health care provider. The figures do not represent the number of patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the year. 2. Ungrossed data Figures have not been adjusted for shortfalls in data, that is the data is ungrossed. Source: Hospital Episode Statistics, The Information Centre for health and social care

Surrey and Sussex NHS Trust

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people are expected to be made redundant at the Surrey and Sussex NHS trust in the financial year 2006-07. (94968)

University Hospital of Hartlepool

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people were admitted to the University hospital of Hartlepool accident and emergency department in each of the last five years. (94089)

Finished in-year admission episodes via accident and emergency services, national health service hospitals, England, 2000-01 to 2004-05Method of admission: EmergencyDescription of provider: North Tees and Hartlepool NHS TrustNumber2004-0515,5962003-0412,7842002-0312,0072001-0211,8092000-0110,982 Notes: Method of admission 1. Emergency: via accident and emergency services, including the casualty department of the provider.2. A finished in-year admission is the first period of in-patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider, excluding admissions beginning before 1 April at the start of the data year. Admissions do not represent the number of in-patients, as a person may have more than one admission within the year. 3. Figures have not been adjusted for shortfalls in data, that is the data is ungrossed. Source: Hospital Episodes Statistics, The Information Centre for health and social care.

Waiting Lists/Times

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average waiting time was for (a) cancer and (b) cardiac patients in Barnet who were waiting for (A) outpatient appointments and (B) surgery or other in-patient treatment in (i) May 1997 and (ii) May 2006; and if she will make a statement. (96928)

Cancer waiting times data is not available for 1997 and 2006 data is not available in the format requested. Cardiac waiting times data is not held centrally.

A cancer out-patient waiting time standard of a maximum two weeks from urgent general practitioner referral to first being seen by a specialist was introduced in 2000. The latest quarterly performance data (quarter one, April to June 2006) shows that at Barnet and Chase Farm hospitals NHS trust 100 per cent. of cancer patients were seen within two weeks of urgent referral by their GP.

Cancer treatment standards of two months from urgent GP referral to first cancer treatment and one month from diagnosis to first cancer treatment were introduced at the end of 2005. Latest quarterly performance data shows that 95.1 per cent. of patients were treated within two months of urgent referral by their general practitioner and 100 per cent. of cancer patients were treated within one month of diagnosis at Barnet and Chase Farm hospitals NHS trust.

West Sussex Health Care

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) doctors, (b) nurses and (c) other health care professionals were working at (i) the Princess Royal hospital, Haywards Heath, (ii) St Richard’s hospital, Chichester and (iii) Worthing hospital in each of the last five years. (94862)

The information requested is only available at trust level. Information on the numbers of medical staff at the Brighton and Sussex university hospitals national health service trust, Worthing and Southlands hospitals NHS trust and the Royal West Sussex NHS trust has been placed in the Library.