Skip to main content

Local Government

Volume 454: debated on Monday 11 December 2006

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many targets her Department sets for local authorities; and what they are. (104906)

The Department for Communities and Local Government has set three national targets for local authorities. Details are set out as follows:

By 2007-08, each local authority to achieve total efficiency gains equivalent to 7.5 per cent. of their baseline expenditure in 2004-05;

By 2010, all social housing to meet minimum standards of decency. Details available at http://www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1152190

By 2010, 70 per cent. of vulnerable households in the private sector to live in a decent home.

In addition, a further three targets have been set for fire and rescue authorities:

By 2010, reduce the number of accidental fire-related deaths in the home by 20 per cent.;

By 2010, achieve a 10 per cent. reduction in deliberate fires;

By 2010, no local fire and rescue authority to have a fatality rate, from accidental fires in the home, of more than 1.25 times the national average.

Annual targets are also set for specified local authorities requiring them to process planning applications within a prescribed period of time.

Targets are additionally set through Local Area Agreements (LAAs). These are three-year agreements, based on local community strategies, which set out the priorities for a local area.

There are also a number of floor targets, setting minimum standards that every area should meet, which have been set by central Government as part of each Spending Review since 2000. These floor targets now cover six thematic areas: crime, education, housing, employment, health and liveability, and are designed to help reduce the gap between the most deprived neighbourhoods and the rest. Details of these floor targets, showing changes made to the targets and where targets have been rolled over or removed at each Spending Review, are available via the HMT website at the following addresses, and are made available in the Library of the House:

Changes from 2000-02 SR:

http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk./Spending_Review/spend_sr02/psa/spend_sr02psatargets.cfm

Changes from 2002-04 SR:

http://performance.treasury.gov.uk/recontopublishsr02to04.pdf

The local government White Paper, “Strong and Prosperous Communities”, published on 26 October, set out proposals for a new performance framework for local authorities and their partners. As part of the new framework, the number of targets for each area will be limited to around 35, plus the 18 statutory early years and performance targets from the Department for Education and Skills, agreed through the LAA.

Targets will reflect the agreed set of national outcomes and will be set against the approximately 200 national indicators that will be determined through next year’s Comprehensive Spending Review.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government in what circumstances a local authority is able to impose penalties on contractors who fail to complete works to an agreed deadline. (105128)

Local authorities are responsible for taking their own procurement decisions subject to the requirements of Best Value legislation and to the EU/UK regulatory framework. However, generally speaking, parties to a contract may agree inclusion within contracts of mechanisms by which sums of money may be paid as compensation for a late or failed delivery. The sum must be a genuine pre-estimate of loss to be upheld by the courts.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much has been awarded to Westminster city council under the Neighbourhood Renewal Fund since its inception; and what amount has been allocated for 2007-08. (105217)

Westminster city council received the following allocations through the Neighbourhood Renewal Fund since its inception in 2001-02:

£

2001-02

748,000

2002-03

1,123,000

2003-04

1,497,000

2004-05

1,497,000

2005-06

1,497.000

2006-07

3,055,379

A further £3,562,712 will be received in 2007-08, making a total allocation of £12,980,091 over seven years.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what assets are held by each regional local government pension scheme; and how many members there are in each regional local government pension scheme. (105291)

[holding answer 7 December 2006]: The market value of the assets held by the Local Government Pension Scheme fund authorities in England as at 31 March 2006 and the number of active, deferred and pensioner members of those funds is shown in the following table. The data are derived from annual returns submitted to the Department by LGPS administering authorities in England.

Local authority

Number of active members

Number of pensioners: retired employees or dependants

Number of former members entitled to deferred benefits

Market value at end of year (£000)

Bath and North East Somerset UA

34,618

17,743

18,165

2,043,304

Bedfordshire

15,721

9,660

9,315

980,356

Berkshire

16,859

9,363

10,355

1,376,608

Buckinghamshire

16,884

9,599

9,613

1,077,856

Cambridgeshire

21,515

10,071

16,410

1,270,646

Cheshire

31,807

17,622

13,960

2,171,422

Cornwall

15,917

7,093

7,370

919,515

Cumbria

17,563

10,017

6,566

1,093,374

Derbyshire

34,847

18,066

12,037

1,920,422

Devon

35,023

19,212

15,229

1,985,968

Dorset

22,720

11,112

8,924

1,257,329

Durham

18,704

13,625

7,225

1,333,700

East Riding of Yorkshire UA

35,163

17,588

15,655

1,839,699

East Sussex

21,907

12,164

12,273

1,595,781

Essex

40,297

23,830

20,650

2,795,041

Gloucestershire

17,901

8,622

8,593

876,872

Hampshire

47,939

24,470

25,289

2,713,627

Hereford and Worcester

18,793

10,597

8,278

1,149,634

Hertfordshire

25,599

17,125

15,532

1,962,323

Isle of Wight UA

4,783

2,480

2,374

238,939

Kent

39,399

24,840

21,905

2,375,106

Lancashire

52,292

31,290

26,458

3,477,527

Leicestershire

30,395

14,668

16,405

1,984,639

Lincolnshire

20,187

8,477

12,805

1,062,399

Middlesbrough UA

26,457

14,817

10,119

1,830,067

Norfolk

23,998

13,111

11,441

1,712,619

North Yorkshire

27,987

11,159

10,903

1,150,528

Northamptonshire

18,147

9,263

8,290

1,046,480

Northumberland

9,583

5,747

4,600

612,345

Nottinghamshire

40,729

20,233

18,427

2,250,837

Oxfordshire

19,771

7,881

8,399

958,085

Shropshire

14,102

6,398

6,303

852,118

Somerset

18,463

8,818

9,025

982,601

Staffordshire

38,405

18,311

17,948

2,061,958

Suffolk

16,584

8,938

6,762

1,182,526

Surrey

22,762

15,015

16,620

1,617,747

Warwickshire

13,388

6,706

5,335

945,000

West Sussex

22,446

11,585

10,830

1,446,091

Wiltshire

19,186

8,409

10,489

1,048,377

Merseyside Pension Fund

49,721

37,579

21,066

4,040,929

Tameside

102,707

71,970

58,165

8,943,861

Tyne and Wear Superannuation Fund

48,986

29,563

18,887

3,419,433

West Midlands Pension Fund

104,414

57,328

57,434

6,900,987

West Yorkshire Superannuation Fund

92,487

53,287

51,237

6.616,032

Camden

5,914

5,176

5,790

744,851

City of London

3,559

3,061

2,447

446,644

Greenwich

6,091

4,886

3,076

696,911

Hackney

4,363

5,811

4,963

615,882

Hammersmith and Fulham

4,700

3,694

3,410

431,250

Islington

5,417

4,718

4,361

662,210

Kensington and Chelsea

3,206

2,036

2,515

378,515

Lambeth

4,471

5,958

5,304

677,408

Lewisham

6,400

5,353

5,859

675,298

Southwark

6,526

5,667

4,640

692,394

Tower Hamlets

5,567

3,517

3,788

648,826

Wandsworth

4,820

4,021

4,862

659,195

Westminster

4,027

4,608

4,592

643,711

Barking and Dagenham

5,241

3,973

2,999

497,858

Barnet

6,755

5,525

4,556

497,782

Bexley

4,588

3,309

2,672

391,078

Brent

5,495

4,870

4,639

456,753

Bromley

4,116

3,898

2,526

336,267

Croydon

6,607

5,188

3,537

501,214

Ealing

6,628

5,670

4,400

516,595

Enfield

5,378

3,374

2,421

500,779

Haringey

7,176

5,427

4,426

573,458

Harrow

5,615

3,537

3,692

410,393

Havering

5,613

4,391

2,580

340,946

Hillingdon

6,120

4,364

3,437

543,622

Hounslow

6,014

4,283

4,423

408,276

Kingston upon Thames

3,976

2,580

2,397

291,986

Merton

3,347

2,640

2,075

283,881

Newham

6,889

5,612

3,808

552,033

Redbridge

4,797

3,556

2,453

317,876

Richmond upon Thames

3,264

2,625

2,516

311,300

Sutton

3,755

2,412

2,051

277,173

Waltham Forest

6,544

5,228

4,067

443,526

London Pensions Fund Authority

21,037

32,235

20,853

3,474,013

South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Authority

661

1,024

555

153,205

South Yorkshire Pensions Fund Authority

53,473

30,125

23,413

3,423,481

West Midlands Passenger Transport Authority

1,284

2,952

1,108

369,955

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many days were lost to (a) long-term and (b) short-term sick leave in each local authority in each year since 1997; and if she will make a statement. (105670)

The Best Value Performance Indicator 12 provides information on sickness absence records for each local authority. Figures from 2000-01 are available at www.bvpi.gov.uk.

Figures for 2005-06 have recently been collated and will be added shortly. Sickness absence data was not collected by the Department prior to 2000. Councils are not required to report the split between long-term and short-term sick leave.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government which local authority wards have received funding from urban regeneration programmes since 1979; under which programmes each received funding; and how much each received. (105724)

The information requested is not available in the format requested and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. Historically the Department has not collated this information at ward level, as all funds were allocated by individual projects/programmes rather than by ward.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much Tamworth Borough Council received from central government in real terms in each of the past six years. (105737)

The central Government grant received by Tamworth borough council expressed in terms of 2005-06 prices in each of the past six years is shown in the following table.

2005-06 prices (£000)

2000-01

5,392

2001-02

5,528

2002-03

5,537

2003-04

6,426

2004-05

5,730

2005-06

6,523

Source:

Communities and Local Government Revenue Outturn (RO) returns and HM Treasury GDP deflators

The real terms figures have been calculated using the latest GDP deflators.

Government grant is defined here as the sum of specific grants inside aggregate external finance (i.e. revenue grants paid for councils' core services), formula grant (revenue support grant, redistributed business rates and police grant) and Greater London Authority (GLA) grant.

Comparisons across years may not be valid due to changing local authority responsibilities. The information provided excludes capital funding and funding for local authorities' housing management responsibilities. The information also excludes those grant programmes, such as European funding, where authorities are simply one of the recipients of funding paid towards an area.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) what estimate of the number of A8 migrants in local authority areas will be used in the calculation of support grant to local authorities in England; (105842)

(2) how she plans to reflect the impact of A8 migration on the allocation of funds to local authorities in England.

[holding answer 29 November 2006]: The 2007-08 Local Government Finance Settlement is the second year of a two-year settlement period. Provisional allocations for 2007-08 were therefore first published in December 2005. Multi-year settlements have been welcomed by local government.

For the Local Government Finance settlements, we have to use the best data that are available at the time, and that treat all local authorities on a consistent basis.

Therefore, for the measure of the resident population in the 2007-08 settlement, we have used the 2003-based sub-national population projection for 2007 as the key measure of population, and the mid-2004 estimate of population within other indicators used in the top-up formulae. These were the best data available at the time.

As multi-year settlements bring stability and predictability to local authority funding, we do not intend to change the settlement from that previously announced, other than in exceptional circumstances.

The next round of multi-year settlements, for 2008-09 to 2010-11, will be made in late 2007. The best data on population that will be available at that point will be the 2004-based sub-national population projections and the mid-2006 estimate of population.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much was spent on (a) electricity and (b) gas by each local authority in each year since 2001; what the average expenditure on electricity and gas was by local authorities in each year; and if she will make a statement. (106320)

The information requested is not available for all local authorities in England. The England estimates of local authority expenditure on (a) electricity and (b) gas and other energy costs are tabled as follows.

£000

Energy costs

Electricity

Gas and other1

2001-02

304,002

151,698

2002-03

302,066

201,290

2003-04

342,258

187,822

2004-05

361,070

222,481

2005-06

432,081

305,133

1 Figures collected for 2001-02 were for gas only while from 2002-03 onwards figures include gas and other energy costs. As 2002-03 was the first year of the new definition, the figure for that year may be less reliable.

Source:

Communities and Local Government Revenue Outturn (RO) suite of forms—Subjective Analysis Return (SAR).