Skip to main content

Judges: Housing

Volume 458: debated on Tuesday 13 March 2007

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if she will assess the merits of providing judges with an accommodation allowance per night to be spent either on lodgings or on hotel accommodation at their discretion; if she will estimate the change in costs which would result from the introduction of such a system; and if she will make a statement. (125996)

While the provision of judges’ lodgings is kept under constant review, and the comparative cost of hotels considered, there is presently no intention to provide judges with an independent accommodation allowance while simultaneously running lodgings.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what (a) estimate she has made of the cost and (b) assessment she has made of the merits of providing judges with hotel accommodation instead of judges’ lodgings in each location where lodgings are situated; and if she will make a statement. (125997)

A straight comparison of the cost between housing judges in hotels or accommodating them in lodgings is not easily made. Judges’ lodgings are an essential requirement for accommodating high court judges sitting outside of London. They provide a safe and secure environment and enable the judges to work in privacy and ensure confidentiality for extended periods, which hotels are unable to match except at prohibitive cost.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if she will discontinue judges’ lodgings where they are occupied by judges for less than 50 nights in the year; and if she will make a statement. (125998)

In the current locations where we have a requirement for less than 50 judge nights per year we do not own lodgings; instead we rent them.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what changes to the (a) arrangements for and (b) availability of judges' lodgings have been made since 1997; and if she will make a statement. (126092)

The following are the major changes that have taken place since 1997:

The lodgings at Mold was closed.

The lodgings at Exeter, Lewes, Oxford and Truro have been replaced with better value accommodation.

There have been a significant number of actions to reduce running costs including the removal of the outdated butler posts.

A more cost-effective system for getting judges to court has been introduced using the Government Car and Despatch Agency.

Introduction of new finance and accounting regimes reducing the management overheads of running the lodgings.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs which five judges' lodgings had (a) the lowest occupancy in judge nights and (b) the highest cost per judge night in the last period for which figures are available; and if she will make a statement. (126093)

The five judges’ lodgings with the lowest occupancy in judge nights during 2005-06 (all of which are hired, not owned) were Warwick, Caernarfon, Lincoln, Northampton and Worcester.

The highest cost per judge night during 2005-06 were Maidstone, Swansea, Winchester, St. Albans and Chelmsford.

The Maidstone lodging is being sold.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs which judges’ lodgings are held (a) freehold, (b) leasehold and (c) by other arrangements; what other such arrangements there are; and if she will make a statement. (126094)

A schedule showing rights of occupation is detailed as follows.

Property name

Freehold

Leasehold

Licence

Hiring

Birmingham judges’ lodgings

v

Bristol judges’ lodgings

v

Caernarfon judges’ lodgings

v

Cardiff judges’ lodgings

v

Carlisle judges’ lodgings

v

Chelmsford judges’ lodgings

v

Chester judges’ lodgings

v

Exeter judges’ lodgings

v

Kingston Upon Hull

v

Leeds judges’ lodging

v

Leicester judges’ lodgings

v

Lewes judges’ lodging

v

Lincoln judges’ lodgings

v

Liverpool judges’ lodgings

v

Maidstone judges’ lodgings

v

Manchester judges’ lodgings

v

Newcastle judges’ lodgings

v

Northampton judges’ lodgings

v

Norwich judges’ lodgings

v

Nottingham judges’ lodgings

v

Oxford judges’ lodgings

v

Plymouth judges’ lodgings

v

Preston judges’ lodgings

v

Reading judges’ lodgings

v

Sheffield judges’ lodgings

v

St. Albans Judges’ lodgings

v

Stafford judges’ lodgings

v

Swansea judges’ lodgings

v

Truro judges’ lodgings

v

Warwick judges’ lodgings

v

Winchester judges’ lodgings

v

Worcester judges’ lodgings

v

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what discussions she has held with the judiciary on the (a) cost and (b) future of judges' lodgings; and if she will make a statement. (126095)

My officials are in regular discussion with the judiciary regarding both the cost and future of judges’ lodgings.