Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 459: debated on Thursday 26 April 2007

Written Answers to Questions

Thursday 26 April 2007

Leader of the House

EC Law: Parliamentary Scrutiny

To ask the Leader of the House what plans he has to improve scrutiny of EU legislation. (133850)

This remains under consideration. I have recently discussed the matter with the chairman of the European Scrutiny Committee.

House of Commons Commission

Waste Disposal

To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission what percentage of waste from the House of Commons Estate for (a) recycling and (b) incineration was exported for processing in each of the past three years. (120731)

The House’s waste contractor has reported the following:

(a) Recycling:

Paper and cardboard

Once the paper and cardboard is processed, ideally it is all then sold to paper mills within the UK. However, because the re-sale market for this material varies so much on a daily basis, sometimes this material is exported to Europe and the Far East. It is not possible to establish the percentage of the House of Commons’ paper and cardboard that is exported.

Glass, plastic and metals

The other main recyclable materials such as glass, plastic and metals are generally sold on to reprocessing plants based within the UK.

Soil and hardcore waste is handled and reused within the UK.

(b) Incineration:

None of the waste for incineration is exported. It is all sent to the contractor’s Energy from Waste Plant in North London.

Wales

Departments: Paper

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what percentage of paper used (a) for photocopying and (b) in printed publications by his Office was from recycled sources in each of the last three years. (134050)

In the last three years the Wales Office has used 100 per cent. recycled paper for photocopying and printing, and the paper used in our publications for the last three years has been at least 75 per cent. recycled.

Official Visits

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how many days he spent in Wales on official business in each of the last 12 months; and on how many occasions he stayed overnight. (133620)

In the last 12 months I have spent 67 days in Wales in my capacity as Secretary of State for Wales.

In addition to the time spent in Wales, the Under-Secretary of State and I undertake Wales business in Parliament and in the Wales Office at Gwydyr House in London.

Transport

Aviation: Nepal

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what discussions he has had with (a) Virgin Airlines, (b) British Airways and (c) other carriers on the possibility of direct flights from the UK to Nepal; (133565)

(2) what representations he has received on the desirability of direct flights between the UK and Nepal.

Ministers and officials meet regularly with UK airlines to discuss their future plans for all parts of the world. No specific representations relating to air services to Nepal have been made in any recent discussions with airlines or other bodies. It is a matter for airlines to decide which destinations they wish to serve.

Crossrail Line

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what his timetable is for making a decision on the Crossrail project in London. (126866)

Crossrail funding and financing issues will be considered further in the context of Sir Michael Lyons’ recommendations and wider spending pressures and priorities. However, the affordability challenge represented by the scheme remains significant.

Highways Agency: Vehicles

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport for what reason the Highways Agency uses four wheel drive vehicles for motorway patrols. (133885)

The Traffic Officer Service is a 24 hour- 365 day operation covering all the motorways in England and certain key interlinking trunk roads. Given the nature of the service it is essential that the vehicles which are provided for patrol activities are able to safely operate in adverse weather conditions such as snow and slippery surfaces, hence four wheel drive is considered to be essential. This drive provision also enables the vehicles to be used for certain carriageway clearance operations. There is also a further requirement for a high payload in order to carry the crew, essential kit and, where appropriate, passengers, which means that only vehicles of a particular size can safely be used.

M1

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will take steps to reduce congestion on the southbound carriageway of the M1 motorway caused by queuing vehicles seeking to exit at junction 19; if he will consider widening the road at this point to create an extra lane; and if he will make a statement. (133932)

The Highways Agency is aware of queuing on the M1 southbound approach to junction 19. A major improvement scheme is programmed which will increase capacity and improve flow at this junction. One of the anticipated benefits will be to eliminate the queuing problem. Preparatory work is in progress and, subject to statutory processes being completed, work on site is expected to begin in February 2009.

As an interim measure advance warning signs have been installed for safety reasons. There are no plans to widen this section of the M1.

Motor Vehicles: Registration

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many prosecutions were brought against the keepers of foreign registered vehicles for failing to re-register their vehicle details with the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency after six months in each of the last five years. (132948)

There is no current legislation available to the Agency, which allows for the prosecution of keepers of foreign vehicles who have failed to register their vehicles within the required timescales.

However, if the Agency receives a report recording the sighting of an unlicensed vehicle on the road, the Agency is able to prosecute under the legislation provided by Section 29 VERA. There are practical difficulties with this and unless a name and address of the keeper of the foreign vehicle is provided the Agency is unable to pursue these cases. The Agency is able to utilise other enforcement action such as the wheel clamping and impounding of a vehicle. Vehicle keepers are required to provide evidence of registration in the UK and licensing before the release of the vehicle. The number of prosecutions of foreign vehicles under this legislation in each of the last five years is not collated.

Motorcycles: Licensing

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 6 March 2007, Official Report, column 1853W, on motorcycles: licensing, what the location will be of each of the off-road motorcycle test facilities that will be available for use at the date of the implementation of the off-road manoeuvre aspects of the European Second Driving Licence Directive; and if he will make a statement. (133882)

The following lists the 67 search areas identified by the Driving Standards Agency (DSA) for possible locations of off-road motorcycle test facilities (ORMTF). The list also indicates the 20 acquired before the end of March 2007.

It is not possible to confirm which of the remaining 47 sites will be operational by October 2008. This is because acquisition and construction are subject to market availability, planning consent, brownfield remediation, and other factors outside DSA’s control.

We are confident that, by the implementation date of October 2008, most customers will be able to reach an MPTC within 45 minutes, travelling no more than 20 miles. DSA will also reach the current target of 40 per cent. of customers being within 20 miles or 45 minutes of an ORMTF by March 2008.

Search locations:

Aberdeen

Aylesbury

Ayr

Bangor

Bathgate

Blackburn

Bournemouth

Bristol East

Burgess Hill

Burton-upon-Trent

Cambridge

Carlisle

Chester

Dumfries

Dundee

Eastbourne

Fareham

Greater London East (Essex)

Greater London South (Croydon)

Greater London West

Greater Manchester North

Guildford

Haverfordwest

Herne Bay

Inverness

Isle of Wight

Keighley

Kirkcaldy

Leeds or Wakefield

Lerwick

Lincoln

Macclesfield North or Stockport

Maidstone/Gillingham

Merseyside (St. Helens)

Norwich

Oban

Peterborough

Plymouth East

Reading, Basingstoke or Newbury

Redruth

Stoke

Swindon

Taunton

Wellingborough or Kettering

Wick

Wolverhampton

York

Search location for which a property has been acquired:

Bedford

Birmingham South

Darlington North

East Lothian

Exeter

Gateshead

Glasgow

Gloucester

Greater London South - Erith

Greater London North - Enfield

Hull

Ipswich

King’s Lynn

Leicester South

Newport

Nottingham East

Rotherham

Scunthorpe

Shrewsbury

Swansea

Work and Pensions

Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many children were in working and non-working households (a) below 60 per cent. of median income, (b) in the bottom 20 per cent. of the income distribution and (c) the bottom 30 per cent. of the income distribution in each year since 1994-95. (133943)

The available information is in the following tables.

At present, we are unable to provide data for 2005-06 as the Households Below Average Income 2005-06 release is currently being revised. The new release will be available from mid-May.

The Secretary of State made a written statement to Parliament on 23 April 2007, Official Report, column 20WS on why the statistics are being revised.

(a) Number of children (millions) living in households below 60 per cent. of median income: by working/non-working households: before housing costs

Working households

Non-working households

1994-95

1.3

1.9

1995-96

1.2

1.8

1996-97

1.4

2.0

1997-98

1.6

1.9

1998-99

1.5

1.8

1999-2000

1.5

1.7

2000-01

1.3

1.6

2001-02

1.4

1.6

2002-03

1.4

1.6

2003-04

1.3

1.5

2004-05

1.3

1.4

(b) Number of children (millions) living in households below 20 per cent. of income distribution: by working/non-working households: before housing costs

Working households

Non-working households

1994-95

1.4

2.0

1995-96

1.3

2.0

1996-97

1.5

2.0

1997-98

1.6

1.9

1998-99

1.6

1.8

1999-2000

1.6

1.8

2000-01

1.5

1.7

2001-02

1.5

1.7

2002-03

1.6

1.7

2003-04

1.6

1.7

2004-05

1.6

1.6

(c) Number of children (millions) living in households below 30 per cent. of income distribution: by working/non-working households: before housing costs

Working households

Non-working households

1994-95

2.3

2.5

1995-96

2.3

2.6

1996-97

2.4

2.5

1997-98

2.6

2.3

1998-99

2.6

2.3

1999-2000

2.6

2.3

2000-01

2.6

2.2

2001-02

2.7

2.1

2002-03

2.8

2.1

2003-04

2.7

2.1

2004-05

2.8

2.0

Notes: 1. The information is for Great Britain up to 2001/02 and for the United Kingdom from 2002-03 onwards. 2. It is based on OECD equivalisation factors and therefore will not be the same as any figures previously published that were based on McClements equivalisation. factors. Source: Family Resources Survey

Children: Maintenance

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions whether the Child Support Agency uses local authority certificated bailiffs for the collection of arrears of child support payments. (130862)

The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive. He will write to the hon. Gentleman with the information requested.

Letter from Stephen Geraghty, dated 26 April 2007:

In reply to your recent Parliamentary Question about the Child Support Agency, the Secretary of State promised a substantive reply from the Chief Executive.

You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether the Child Support Agency uses local authority certificated bailiffs for the collection of arrears of child support payments. [130862]

The Agency’s bailiffs are appointed by the county court, not the local authority. As such, the bailiffs used by the Agency are county court certificated, rather than local authority certificated.

Certificated bailiffs are granted a certificate by a County Court judge which allows them to levy distress for rent. To obtain a certificate, the applicant must satisfy the judge that he is a fit and proper person to hold a certificate, that he has sufficient knowledge of the law of distress, and that he is not in the business of buying debts.

Further information concerning the certification of bailiffs can be found on the Department for Constitutional Affairs website at the following address:

http://www.dca.gov.uk/enforcement/enfrev01/repac/htm.

I hope you find this answer helpful.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) what action he is taking to speed up execution of arrest warrants in cases of persistent failure to pay child support; (123984)

(2) what the target time is for the period between the issuance and execution of arrest warrants in cases of persistent failure to pay child support; and what the average time was in the last period for which figures are available.

The administration of the Child Support Agency is the matter for the Chief Executive. He will write to my hon. Friend with the information requested.

Letter from Stephen Geraghty, dated 26 April 2006:

In reply to your recent Parliamentary Question about the Child Support Agency, the Secretary of State promised a substantive reply from the Chief Executive.

You asked the Secretary for Work and Pensions, what action he is taking to speed up execution of arrest warrants in cases of persistent failure to pay child support. [123984]

and;

You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the target time is for the period between the issuance and execution of arrest warrants in cases of persistent failure to pay child support; and what the average time was in the last period for which figures are available. [124015]

The priority for execution of child support warrants is set by each Magistrates’ court who will arrange for the execution of warrants through either their own civilian enforcement officers or the Police. The Agency cannot set a target for the executions of warrants.

The Agency is working with the Office for Criminal Reform and the Department of Constitutional Affairs on an ongoing basis to improve the current time taken to execute arrest warrants.

The current management information system cannot provide the average period between the issuance and execution of warrants. As at the end of January 2007 the Agency had 278 outstanding warrants in England and Wales. The average period for which these have been outstanding is approximately 50 weeks.

I hope you find this response helpful.

Community Care Grant

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people received a community care grant in each of the last three years; and how many (a) were disabled and (b) were receiving disability living allowance. (116523)

[holding answer 18 January 2007]: The available information is in the following table.

Number of people who received community care grant awards in Great Britain

2004-05

2005-06

All

261,000

273,000

Disabled

94,000

96,000

Notes:

1. A community care grant award is recorded as being made in a given year if the final decision on the application (including any review(s)) was made in that year.

2. Some people in each category received more than one community care grant award in a year.

3. The disabled category does not include pensioners who are disabled or unemployed people who are disabled.

4. Figures have been rounded to the nearest 1,000.

5. Figures are based on an analysis of all community care grant decisions held on the social fund computer system at the end of September following each year.

Departments: Eastbourne

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many of his Department’s staff are located in Eastbourne. (130930)

The Department for Work and Pensions currently employs 99 staff (equating to 84.9 full-time equivalent posts) in Eastbourne.

Departments: Official Hospitality

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what measures are in place to limit the amount of money spent on alcohol for hospitality purposes by his Department. (132189)

Any expenditure on alcohol for hospitality purposes is made in accordance with published departmental guidance on financial procedures and propriety, based on principles set out in Government Accounting and the Treasury handbook on Regularity and Propriety.

Accordingly alcohol is provided only as an exception and only with the specific written authority of a small number of designated senior civil servants.

Deprived Areas Fund

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) what deprived areas fund allocations his Department (a) made in 2006-07 and (b) plans to make in 2007-08, broken down by district; and if he will make a statement; (129634)

(2) how much of the deprived areas funds allocated by his Department in 2006-07 have been spent, broken down by district; and if he will make a statement.

[holding answer 23 March 2007]: Information on the Deprived Areas Fund allocation by district for 2006/07 and 2007/08 is in the table.

Information on spend from the fund is only available for one district; Forth Valley, Fife and Tayside. It has recorded a spend of £17,640 to the end of February. Information on spend by other districts will be available later in the year as part of their regular reporting process.

Any unspent allocation for 2006-07 will be carried over to 2007-08.

Deprived areas fund allocation

£

Jobcentre Plus District

2006-07

2007-08

Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire

98,877

313,000

Essex

71,305

226,000

Norfolk

69,404

222,000

Cambridgeshire and Suffolk

58,946

189,000

Derbyshire

173,034

537,000

Leicestershire and Northamptonshire

292,828

79,576

Lincolnshire and Rutland

91,271

287,000

Nottinghamshire

402,163

186,998

West London

373,640

0

Central London

438,291

1,349,000

City and East London

1,463,187

21,218

Lambeth, Southwark and Wandsworth

905,103

2,780,000

North and North East London

934,576

2,034,549

South London

598,965

1 ,405,983

Northumbria

533,365

0

South Tyne and Wear Valley

810,030

527,309

Tees Valley

518,153

1,596,000

Cheshire and Warrington

59,897

193,000

Cumbria

134,054

418,000

Greater Mersey

574,246

0

Liverpool and Wirral

791,966

0

Lancashire

509,596

1,167,223

Greater Manchester Central

803,374

0

Greater Manchester East and West

422,128

0

Ayrshire, Dumfries, Galloway and Inverclyde

436,389

1,344,000

Edinburgh, Lothian and Borders

160,675

97,897

Forth Valley, Fife and Tayside

405,966

793,303

Glasgow

946,936

0

Highlands, Islands and Clyde Coast and Grampian

365,084

1,125,000

Lanarkshire and East Dunbartonshire

442,094

1,361,000

Berks, Bucks and Oxfordshire

47,537

26,000

Hampshire

47,537

110,000

Kent

89,369

280,000

Surrey and Sussex

86,517

274,000

Devon and Cornwall

83,665

265,000

Dorset and Somerset

47,537

89,000

Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Swindon

47,537

128,000

West of England

96,025

301,000

South Wales Valleys

922,217

1,233,587

North and Mid Wales

186,345

492,035

South East Wales

290,926

789,746

South West Wales

486,778

1,491,000

Birmingham and Solihull

821 ,438

0

Coventry and Warwickshire

90,320

0

Staffordshire

81 ,764

257,000

The Black Country

463,961

0

The Marches

0

0

North East Yorkshire and The Humber

301,384

932,000

South Yorkshire

538,118

0

West Yorkshire

685,483

2,105,000

Total

19,300,000

27,027,424

Notes: 1. Districts recorded as having a zero Deprived Areas Fund (DAF) allocation for 2007/08 are in City Strategy areas. In these areas, DAF money will be allocated to City Strategy consortia. 2. In the Marches district, only one ward qualified for DAF allocation in 2006/07. As this was a very modest amount, a decision was taken to carry it forward to 2007/08 and include it in the City Strategy consortia allocation. Source: WP Areas Initiatives and Communities Division

Employment: Discrimination

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what assessment he has made of the effect of the implementation of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 on company benefits available to retired employees; and if he will make a statement. (131993)

The Employment Equality (Age) Regulations implement the age strand of Directive 2000/78 EC establishing a framework for equal treatment in employment and vocational training. This requirement makes it unlawful for pension schemes to discriminate against members or prospective members of a pension scheme and was introduced in December 2006.

In the last few months, companies have been reviewing their occupational pension schemes in compliance with these regulations. The Government’s aim has been to ensure that occupational pension provision will not be jeopardised by this legislation, but it is still too early to assess the effect in practice of these regulations.

Jobcentres: Norfolk

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) what associated services are offered by (a) Swaffham and (b) Downham Market Jobcentre Plus branches; and what plans have been made for their continued provision if these Jobcentre Plus branches are closed; (126238)

(2) what assessment he has made of the financial savings that would be achieved as a result of the closure of the Swaffham and Downham Market Jobcentre Plus branches;

(3) what alternatives have been considered to closing Jobcentre Plus branches at Swaffham and Downham Market.

The administration of Jobcentre Plus is a matter for the chief executive of Jobcentre Plus, Lesley Strathie. I have asked her to provide the hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Lesley Strathie, dated 26 April 2007:

The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your questions about the closure of Swaffham and Downham Market Jobcentres. This is something that falls within the responsibilities delegated to me as Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus.

You are already aware that we are currently consulting on the closure of both these sites, and no decision will be made on the closure of either Swaffham or Downham Market until the consultation is complete.

Both these offices currently deliver the full range of Jobcentre Plus services including Fortnightly Jobsearch Reviews for customers in receipt of Jobseekers Allowance. The only exception to this is when customers require New Jobseeker interviews; these are delivered from Dereham for Swaffham customers, and Kings Lynn for Downham Market customers.

Both Jobcentres also provide Jobsearch facilities through our Job Point technology. Additionally customers can access these services via the internet and our Contact Centre Jobseekers Direct Service.

If closure of these Jobcentres does go ahead, we intend to provide all advisory and Fortnightly Jobsearch Reviews in other locations. For Downham Market customers this would usually be at Kings Lynn, unless transport links make it easier for them to travel elsewhere. The majority of Swaffham customers would use Dereham Jobcentre, again unless transport links make it easier for them to travel to another Jobcentre. However we will also consider the provision of alternative ways for customers to access our services.

As part of the consultation we are already considering how we could provide these alternative services. In Downham Market we have opened discussion with the Local Authority regarding the feasibility of delivering Fortnightly Jobsearch Reviews from existing Local Authority premises. We have not yet been able to identify similar opportunities in Swaffham but are continuing discussions with our partners.

In addition to these specific proposals we will ensure that our Internet access and Contact Centre Jobsearch facilities are marketed to our customers. We are also looking at the feasibility of locating some of our Job Points in partner premises.

The financial savings that could be realised if these sites are closed would depend upon the potential alternative services provided.

I hope this is helpful.

New Deal

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) how many New Deal training providers have had their contracts terminated; and for what reason in each case; (111227)

(2) what action has been taken against providers of ineffective training on the New Deal programmes.

New contracts for the delivery of New Deal programmes commenced in May 2006 in Scotland, and in July 2006 in England and Wales. None of those contracts has to date been terminated. Information on whether any New Deal training providers had their contracts terminated between January 1998, when New Deal started, and April 2006, could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

One New Deal prime contract in Jobcentre Plus's South Tyne and Wear Valley District will end by mutual agreement in October 2007. This is because Jobcentre Plus has concluded that the arrangements in place do not deliver the outcomes and quality service expected for customers. Alternative arrangements are being established.

Ineffective providers are dealt with through Department for Work and Pensions contract management processes. In the first instance, a performance improvement plan is agreed with the contractor. If performance fails to improve within a reasonable timescale, a formal breach notice is issued to the contractor. If contract delivery continues to fall below the required standard, the contract is terminated.

Social Security Benefits: Mentally Ill

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to the answer of 15 January 2007, Official Report, column 898W, on mental health, what MIND’s conclusions on quality assurance for the Condition or Disability training product were; and if he will make a statement. (124739)

The administration of Jobcentre Plus is a matter for the Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus, Lesley Strathie. I have asked her to provide the hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Lesley Strathie, dated 26 April 2007:

The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your question pursuant to the answer of 15th January 2007, Official Report, column 898W, on mental health asking what was MIND’s conclusions on quality assurance for the Condition or Disability training product. This is something which falls within the responsibilities delegated to me as Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus.

Jobcentre Plus works with a range of partners including MIND in the development of training materials to support the implementation of the Jobcentre Plus Incapacity Benefit Adviser role. The ‘Working with Customers with a Health Condition or Disability’ training product was developed for staff and sent to MIND for their quality assurance prior to release. On this occasion MIND did not provide any comments or suggestions to the development of this product, however Mencap did respond and we took their comments into consideration.

I hope this is helpful.

Social Security Benefits: Widowed People

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people were in receipt of widowed parent's allowance in each of the last 10 years, in each local authority area. (132172)

Unemployment: Households

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate he has made of the percentage of households of working age adults with no one in work in each year since 1977-78; what projection he has made of that percentage in 2007-08; and if he will make a statement. (123595)

The Labour Force Survey data used to answer this question are only available from 1992. The latest available data are for 2006. There is no information available on the projected percentage of households of working age adults with no one in work for 2007-08.

The available information is in the following table.

Percentage of households of working age adults with no one in work in Great Britain from 1992-2006

Quarter/As at spring

Percentage

1992

19

1993

19.3

1994

20.7

1995

20.1

1996

18.5

1997

17.7

1998

17.4

1999

16.8

2000

16.2

2001

16

2002

16.1

2003

15.8

2004

15.5

2005

15.7

2006

15.4

Notes:

1. Data for 1992-96 are non re-weighted and should not be used in conjunction with data from spring 1997 onwards.

2. Data have been adjusted for unknown economic activity.

3. Figures have been rounded to the nearest thousand.

Source:

Labour Force Survey

Communities and Local Government

Council Housing: Subsidies

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if she will make a statement on her plans to reform or phase out the housing subsidy system for council housing. (129218)

Housing revenue account (HRA) subsidy is based on a notional measure of authorities’ income (which is mainly rents) and expenditure. If need to spend is assumed to be greater than assumed income, then the authority is assumed to have a deficit and HRA subsidy is paid to the authority to make up that shortfall. If the assumed income is greater than the assumed need to spend, this negative subsidy is captured, recycled within the HRA subsidy system and used to help pay for the subsidy entitlement of the deficit authorities. Even with this recycling, in the most recent year for which audited data are available (2005-06), the Exchequer still made an annual contribution of over £200 million.

Surpluses (and deficits) are not related to the efficiency of a council in operating its HRA. Surpluses rarely, if ever, occur where the need to spend is greatest; if we were to allow those authorities that make surpluses to retain them this would, within the total funding levels agreed, mean reduced subsidies and therefore higher rents, for all those authorities with a deficit. The alternative would be higher taxes or cuts in services. We also need to recognise that the surpluses that are being generated by some authorities come from housing that has largely been funded by central Government.

The Department is currently working with a group of local authorities to investigate the potential benefits, in terms of asset management, efficiency and better outcomes, of allowing some councils to leave the subsidy system. Self financing would involve a one-off settlement to replace future subsidy or surplus payments. As such, it would not be a means for surplus authorities simply to retain a larger share of overall housing resources.

Departments: Publicity

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the Department's total spending and that of its predecessors was on advertising and promotional campaigns in each year since 1997; and what the cost of each campaign was, broken down by costs relating to (a) television, (b) radio and (c) print media. (128040)

The Department for Communities and Local Government was established on 5 May 2006. The campaigns run since then are as follows:

The Fire Safety campaign

This was aimed at reducing the number deaths and serious injuries caused by domestic fires. The media spend is as follows:

£

Television

1,200,000

Radio

99,000

Print

118,622

Online

183,000

Home Information Packs campaign.

The aim of the campaign is to inform the industry and those in the market of the introduction of Home Information Packs and to encourage take up. The media spend is as follows:

£

Radio

360,000

Print

1,862,000

Online

561,000

Tenancy Deposit campaign

Aimed at alerting landlords and tenants of their new obligations under the law. The media spend is as follows:

£

Radio

270,000

Print

233,000

Online

70,000

Other

50,000

Fire Order Reform campaign

Aimed at small and medium sized business to alert them to their obligations under the new fire order reform regulations. The media spend was as follows:

£

Radio

339,851.61

Trade Press

111,186.70

National Press

90,048.00

Online

91,994.00

Direct mail.

309,232.00

Connect to your council - Take-Up campaign.

The campaign is aimed at encouraging individuals to use the online services provided by local authorities. The media spend is as follows:

Phase 1 May 2006 to end June 2006

£

Television

n/a

Radio

602,000

Print media

1,034,00

Phase 2 September 2006 to end October 2006

£

Television

n/a

Radio

544,000

Print media

230,000

Fire Services: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many staff she expects to be transferred from existing fire control centres to the regional fire control centres; what consultation she has held with staff and unions about Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) transfer; and what arrangements she plans to make for staff unable to transfer to the new regional fire control centres. (131227)

The number of staff transferring from existing control rooms will not be known until the local authority controlled companies have formulated proposals on staff numbers and structure, and criteria have been developed that define the circumstances under which it would be unreasonable for staff to transfer.

The Department has published guidance on a wide range of issues relating to the transfer and many informal discussions with staff have been held. Formal consultation is a matter for the current employers and the regional control centre companies. For staff who are unlikely to be able to transfer, fire and rescue authorities have been encouraged to find alternative jobs, and where appropriate, to provide retraining. Costs of redeployment and retraining will be borne by the Department, within reason. The Department seeks to avoid compulsory redundancies where possible.

Government Office for London

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer of 26 February 2007, Official Report, column 1144W, on the Government Office for London, for what reasons the information requested is not held centrally; and if she will consider the case for holding such information. (132499)

It is not a valuable use of resources to record centrally all the items of business referred to in the earlier question. Since 2002 Government Office for London (GOL) has had a central database which records draft replies produced for Ministers in all sponsoring Departments in response to hon. Members’ letters. This database shows that GOL has dealt with the following number of Ministerial correspondence cases each year since 2002:

Number

2002-03

503

2003-04

461

2004-05

708

2005-06

325

2006-07

327

There are no plans to record centrally GOL’s direct correspondence with members of the public.

HomeBuy Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many applications have been made for the (a) Open Market HomeBuy, (b) Social HomeBuy and (c) New Build HomeBuy schemes; and how many have been (i) accepted and (ii) refused in each case. (133815)

Between April 2006 and February 2007 there were 19,268 applications for Open Market HomeBuy, of which 10,580 have been approved so far by HomeBuy agents. Only a small number are rejected—the majority of those not approved will be still going through the application process. Of those applications approved, 716 were subsequently cancelled. This can be a result of applicants formally withdrawing from the scheme or, for example, detailed financial checks revealing county court judgments. In addition a large number of approved applicants will simply not pursue their application, without formally withdrawing it.

Between April 2006 and February 2007 there were 73,556 applications for New Build HomeBuy of which 54,624 have been approved by HomeBuy Agents. Only a small number are rejected—the majority of those not approved will be still going through the application process. Information on cancelled approvals is not held for New Build HomeBuy because the applicants buy through a large number of housing association providers, and mortgages are available from all lenders.

A large number of applicants will initially apply for both Open Market and New Build HomeBuy and will therefore feature in both figures.

Between April 2006 and February 2007, 534 applicants were received by RSLs for Social HomeBuy pilots. Information on applications declined for Social HomeBuy is not recorded on a monthly basis, but will be examined as part of an extensive monitoring exercise to be undertaken on the programme later this year.

In the LA sector, between July 2006 and March 2007, 96 applications were received, of which 37 were refused.

Housing: Hartlepool

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many households in (a) Hartlepool constituency, (b) Tees Valley sub-region and (c) North East Region are part of a Shared Home Ownership scheme. (131366)

The following table shows the number of new homes provided on shared ownership terms through the Housing Corporation’s Affordable Housing programme (AHP) and local authority social housing grant (LASHG) in Hartlepool, Tees Valley and North East Region for 2002-03 to 2005-06 and planned 2007-08. We do not hold figures for the numbers of households currently in shared ownership. Information is not available at constituency level.

Shared ownership completions through AHP and LASHG

Hartlepool

Tees Valley

North East

2002-03

0

0

6

2003-04

11

21

26

2004-05

0

23

88

2005-06

0

11

73

2006-071

0

50

100

2007-082

10

99

251

1 Provisional

2 Planned

Note:

Tees Valley includes the following local authorities:

Darlington, Middlesborough, Hartlepool, Stockton on Tees and Redcar and Cleveland

Source:

Housing Corporation

Local Government

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what advice and guidance she has circulated to local authority chief executives on how they should conduct themselves in respect of their public statements when contentious restructuring proposals are under debate; and if she will make a statement. (134089)

Within the statutory framework, including the requirements under the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 restricting certain officers’ party political activities, the conduct of chief executives is a matter for them and their councils.

Officials wrote to all chief executives in areas affected by the 16 unitary proposals under consultation, drawing their attention to the “Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity”. The code makes it clear that local authorities should not at any time use public funds to mount publicity campaigns whose primary purpose is to persuade the public to hold a particular view on a question of policy, and that authorities must take particular care when publicity is issued immediately prior to an election.

Local Government Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer of 16 February 2006, Official Report, column 2239W, on local government finance, in which years since 1997 the Government were required to make up a shortfall on local authority housing revenue accounts between total rental income and the sources of expenditure to which the answer refers. (133352)

[holding answer 23 April 2007]: The Housing Revenue Subsidy System has received a net contribution from the Exchequer in each financial year since 2001-02, when the Major Repairs Allowance was introduced to help councils do more to repair and refurbish council homes.

The net subsidy position for each year between 1997-98 and 2005-06 (the last year for which we have audited figures) is given in the following table, negative figures represent net surpluses for that year and positive figures show net deficits, which were paid by the Exchequer.

£

Net housing element

1997-98

-668,307,497

1998-99

-869,992,311

1999-2000

-1,040,869,030

2000-01

-1,116,331,437

2001-02

351,105,009

2002-03

252,059,142

2003-04

191,153,240

2004-05

78,877,384

2005-06

229,558,982

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what her Department’s allocation was for local authorities’ allowances for management, maintenance and major repairs in (a) 2005-06 and (b) 2006-07; what they are projected to be in 2007-08; and what the total (i) service debt charges and (ii) rental income paid to local authorities were in each year. (133360)

[holding answer 23 April 2007]: Details of management, maintenance and major repairs allowances are given in the following table:

£

Status

Financial year

Management allowance

Maintenance allowance

Major repairs allowance

Audited

2005-06

1,168,254,149

2,052,043,828

1,357,380,814

Provisional

2006-07

1,207,333,911

2,119,654,860

1,313,506,485

Estimated

2007-08

1,253,322,310

2,203,103,351

1,351,978,810

Data on actual rental income and expenditure on debt charges are only available for 2005-06 as these are dependent upon audited returns from local authorities and are shown as follows.

Amount (£)

Debt charges

3,013,330,952

Rental income from dwellings

6,019,037,529

Other rental income

189,132,296

Audited returns for 2006-07 and 2007-08 are not due until December 2007 and December 2008 respectively.

Natural Gas: Pipelines

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what steps she is taking to reduce the length of time taken to commission the construction of gas infrastructure projects following initial planning application prior to the implementation of the measures expected in the Planning White Paper. (133475)

I refer the hon. Member to the reply recently given to him by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry on 24 April 2007, Official Report, columns 1073-74.

The time taken to commission gas infrastructure projects following the initial planning application can be affected by a range of factors—including commercial or technical issues which are for developers themselves to resolve.

The Government have implemented measures to avoid unnecessary delays at the planning application stage in dealing with major infrastructure projects under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. These could, depending on individual circumstances, include gas infrastructure projects. Section 44 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 inserted new sections 76A and 76B into the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to allow the Secretary of State to designate a planning application a major infrastructure project if she thinks it is of national or regional importance. If such is done, the application would be processed via special procedures which are aimed at speeding up the decision making process.

The forthcoming Planning White Paper, to be published this spring, will set out proposals for reforming the consent regime for major infrastructure projects, including major energy projects.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what representations she has received on the length of time taken for (a) planning decisions and (b) other stages of gas infrastructure projects following initial planning applications. (133533)

Since the beginning of the year, the Department has received a parliamentary question about delays in decision making following planning inquiries for gas storage infrastructure and one about the steps being taken to ensure the timely delivery of gas infrastructure projects.

Delays in decision making in these cases can often be attributed to their extremely unusual, technical and complex nature. But the Government are committed to streamlining and simplifying the regulatory regime for approving infrastructure projects, and proposals for doing so will be contained in the forthcoming Planning White Paper, to be published in the spring.

Owner Occupation

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the level of owner occupation is in each constituency. (132249)

Levels of owner occupation by constituency, derived from the 2001 Census, are contained in a House of Commons Research Paper 04/01 entitled “2001 Census of Population: Statistics for Parliamentary Constituencies”, published 30 January 2004.

Planning Permission: Brighton and Hove Albion Football Club

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what representations she has received on the impact on Brighton and Hove Albion Football Club of further delays in announcing a decision on its planning application for a community stadium at Falmer; and what the latest date is by which a decision on the matter will be announced. (132905)

Following the quashing of the original decision on this case in the High Court, representations were sought on a range of issues from interested parties. A number of those representations address the impact on the football club of the lack of a final decision.

My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State set out her target for making a final decision on this case in her letter of 2 March. That date is 9 July, and there are no plans to amend that date.

Recycling: Birmingham

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the best value performance indicators were for kerbside collection of recyclables for Birmingham for each year since 2004-05; whether the authority is on target to comply with provisions in the Household Waste Recycling Act 2003; and what the figures are for (a) other Metropolitan authorities and (b) the best performing local authorities. (133022)

I have been asked to reply.

The best value performance indicator (BVPI) for kerbside collection of recyclables was measured by BVPI 91 in 2004-05. In that year, Birmingham city council reported that 80.6 per cent of its household residents were served by a kerbside recycling collection.

BVPI 91 was revised in 2005-06 to BVPI 91 a and BVPI 91 b, which measure the percentage of household residents served by kerbside recycling collection of (a) one or more recyclables and (b) at least two recyclables.

In 2005-6, Birmingham city council reported that 90.0 per cent. of its household residents were served by kerbside recycling collection of one or more recyclables. 12.2 per cent. were served by collection of two or more recyclables.

Results for BVPI 91 a and BVPI 91 b for 2005-06 for all Metropolitan districts with collection responsibilities are in the following table:

Metropolitan District

BV 91 a

BV 91 b

Barnsley

98.0

98.0

Birmingham

90.0

12.2

Bolton

96.9

96.9

Bradford

100.0

52.0

Bury

98.0

67.3

Calderdale

95.4

95.0

Coventry

84.2

71.0

Doncaster

98.8

98.8

Dudley

88.0

88.0

Gateshead

94.5

94.3

Kirklees

88.7

88.7

Knowsley

95.8

95.8

Leeds

90.1

90.1

Liverpool

91.8

91.8

Manchester

83.0

83.0

Newcastle upon Tyne

89.2

89.2

North Tyneside

98.9

98.9

Oldham

95.0

95.0

Rochdale

94.4

94.2

Rotherham

100.0

100.0

Salford

99.5

99.5

Sandwell

85.4

84.5

Sefton

97.0

97.0

Sheffield

89.8

20.7

Solihull

100.0

85.7

South Tyneside

97.5

97.0

St Helens

100.0

100.0

Stockport

94.9

94.7

Sunderland

98.8

97.3

Tameside

100.0

89.1

Trafford

100.0

86.0

Wakefield City

96.7

42.9

Walsall

95.5

95.5

Wigan

99.5

29.1

Wirral

100.0

65.8

Wolverhampton

88.5

88.5

In 2005-06, two Metropolitan districts, Rotherham and St Helens, reported that 100 per cent. of household residents were served by kerbside recycling collection of two or more recyclables. For the same period, 125 of authorities (35.4 per cent.) with waste collection responsibilities reported the same level of kerbside collection in England.

Under the Household Waste Recycling Act 2003, all local authorities in England are required to collect at least two types of recyclable waste from all households in their area by the end of 2010. It is up to each local authority to plan how it fulfils this requirement.

Regeneration: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much regeneration money has been spent in each constituency since 1997; and what studies have been undertaken to gauge its effectiveness. (134035)

The Department does not record information on regeneration spending by parliamentary constituency and this information could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

We are committed to understanding the effectiveness of our regeneration programmes and have commissioned a wide range of evaluations in support of this. Evaluations completed or underway include the single regeneration budget, coalfields regeneration programmes, housing market renewal pathfinders and the new deal for communities.

Details of research and evaluation commissioned by Communities and Local Government are available from our research management database (RMD) at:

http://www.rmd.communities.gov.uk.

Temporary Accommodation

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the Parliamentary Under-Secretary’s statement on 21 March 2007, Official Report, column 288WH, on households in temporary accommodation, what discussions her Department has had with the Department of Work and Pensions on extending the pilot Working Future scheme for homeless families. (133731)

Working Future is a pilot led by the Greater London Authority and East Thames Group testing the use of a central block grant to subsidise the cost of procuring temporary accommodation in the private sector, which also promotes affordable rents and allows increased access to employment services and training opportunities for 100 households in three London boroughs. There is ongoing dialogue between my Department and the Department of Work and Pensions regarding ‘Working Future’. An evaluation is under way, the result of which will feed into future policy development in this area.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if she will break down by area of expenditure the costs associated with the pilot Working Future scheme for homeless families. (133732)

Households participating in Working Future pay an affordable rent based on the average weekly council rent for the area, the cost of which is met through housing benefit. The remaining housing costs, which reflect the higher rental and management costs associated with temporary accommodation, are funded separately through a direct central Governmentgrant. £2.28 million was made available at the start of the pilot. CLG provided an additional £60,000 in 2006-07 to fund support services to increase employability among homeless households placed in the subsidised temporary accommodation. ‘Working Future is a pilot led by the Greater London Authority and East Thames Group and these and other partner bodies have also contributed.

Urban Areas: Trees

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the loss of street trees was in urban areas in each of the last 10 years. (133405)

A survey of trees in urban areas in England carried out in 2004-05 indicated an overall increase in the number of street trees compared with the situation in 1992. The report of the survey ‘Trees in Towns II’ produced by ADAS and Myerscough College will be published shortly. Copies will be deposited in the House Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what steps are being taken to preserve street trees in cities. (133406)

Local authorities are encouraged to produce tree strategies to promote the planting, maintenance and protection of trees in their areas, including street trees and to use current best practice. Local authorities also have powers to make tree preservation orders to protect trees where it is considered expedient in the interests of amenity.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what steps are being taken to ensure the implementation by local authorities of the European Landscape Convention, in particular Articles 5(b), 5(c) and Article 6, in relation to street trees. (133407)

National planning policies, including Planning Policy Statement 1: Delivering Sustainable Development, already recognise the need to provide appropriate protection and enhancement of urban landscapes, which will include street trees, in England, in line with the principal aims of the European Landscape Convention.

Written Questions

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government when she expects to reply to the question 126225, from the hon. Member for North East Milton Keynes, tabled on 5 March, on planning in Milton Keynes. (134187)

Northern Ireland

Childbirth

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many births in Northern Ireland in the last year were to mothers aged (a) 17 years, (b) 16 years, (c) 15 years and (d) under 15 years of age, broken down by health board area. (133915)

The following table gives the number of live- and still-births1 registered in 20063 by age and Health and Social Services Board2 of residence of mother.

Mother’s age

Eastern HSSB

Northern HSSB

Southern HSSB

Western HSSB

Northern Ireland

Under 15 years

4

2

0

1

7

15

11

12

4

2

29

16

59

33

11

10

113

17

114

53

38

52

257

1 Birth is defined to be either live- or still-birth. Pregnancies which resulted in the birth of twins, triplets or other multiple births are counted twice, three times, etc.

2 Births have been allocated to the area of usual residence of the mother based on her postcode. The data include only those births to mothers resident in Northern Ireland at the time of birth.

3 Provisional data.

Down District Council: Recruitment

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many positions have been advertised by Down district council in the last 12 months; and what the religion was of those subsequently appointed to those positions. (133872)

Employment policies and procedures are matters for each individual council. I have therefore asked the Chief Executive of Down district council to respond direct to the hon. Lady.

Further Education: Internet

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland which further education colleges in Northern Ireland offer on-line courses. (133897)

Although it is not mandatory for further education colleges in Northern Ireland to offer on-line courses, all 16 further education colleges, to a greater or lesser degree, offer on-line learning in some courses. Access to on-line or blended learning and the number of courses for which it is available, varies extensively across the 16 colleges.

Northern Ireland Government; Artefacts

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what the whereabouts are of the Black Rod of the former Senate of Northern Ireland Parliament. (134254)

Black Rod’s Wand is the responsibility of the Northern Ireland Assembly and is stored in the Artefact’s Store in Parliament Buildings. A catalogue of Parliament Buildings artefacts is available from the Office of the Keeper.

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland where the Maces of the former Northern Ireland (a) House of Commons and (b) Senate is; and if he will make a statement. (134256)

The pair of silver maces from the Commons and Senate, London 1924 that were presented to the Northern Ireland Assembly are stored in the Artefact’s Store in Parliament Buildings.

Paper: Recycling

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what assessment he has made of the outcomes of the 12 month pilot project which began on 1 April 2006 involving the use by all Departments in Northern Ireland of photocopying paper manufactured from a minimum of 70 per cent. post-consumer waste. (133916)

An initial assessment of the outcome of the 12 month pilot project, which began on 1 April 2006, is currently under way and will be presented to the Northern Ireland Procurement Board at its next meeting in late May.

I will forward the hon. Gentleman a copy of this paper for information following its consideration by the Procurement Board.

Church Leaders

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland on how many occasions in the last 12 months the Head of the Northern Ireland Civil Service has met leaders of (a) the Presbyterian Church, (b) the Roman Catholic Church, (c) the Church of Ireland, (d) the Methodist Church, (e) the Baptist Union of Ireland, (f) the Free Presbyterian Church, (g) the Elim Pentecostal Church, (h) the Reformed Presbyterian Church (i) the Congregational Union of Ireland, (j) the Evangelical Alliance (k) Evangelical Continuation in Northern Ireland and (l) the Caleb Foundation. (132888)

The Head of the Northern Ireland Civil Service has had no formal meetings with the leaders of these churches and organisations in the last 12 months. He has met once with the Churches Forum, which has representatives from the Presbyterian, Roman Catholic, Church of Ireland and Methodist Church, and he also attended a number of other events with church leaders, including a dinner to mark the retirement of Archbishop Robin Eames and the enthronement of Archbishop Alan Harper. He would be willing to meet representatives of any of the churches and organisations listed, if requested.

Trade and Industry

Bankruptcy

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many individuals applied for individual voluntary arrangements in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. (134479)

There are no published statistics on the number of individuals who have applied for an individual voluntary arrangement. However there are published statistics for the numbers of individual voluntary arrangements approved by creditors for the last five years and they show

IVAs

2002

6,295

2003

7,583

2004

10,752

2005

20,293

2006

44,332

Employment: West Midlands

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry pursuant to the answer of 20 February 2007, Official Report, column 658W, on MG Rover, in which sectors the 100,000 jobs have been created; what the locations are of the 1,000 hectares of brownfield land which have been reclaimed; and what initiatives (a) Advantage West Midlands, (b) the Learning and Skills Council and (c) Birmingham City Council have put in place to assist unemployed former employees of MG Rover and its suppliers. (124757)

Advantage West Midlands does not collect data in the form asked. The agency does have data which disaggregate the jobs total by whether they are jobs in rural, urban or disadvantaged areas but these data are only available from 2005-06 onwards. The sector data are not available and to disaggregate the totals by sector can be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Similarly the total figure of 1,000 hectares of brownfield land which have been reclaimed cannot be disaggregated in the way requested, except at disproportionate cost.

AWM is able to account for 459 hectares of brownfield sites reclaimed since 2003. The remaining 541 hectares were acquired through legacy projects funded by other agencies and programmes, such as the SRB programme and English Partnership.

MG Rover

Following the highly successful work of the MG Rover Task Force over 95 per cent. of ex-MG Rover employees are now back in work. The remaining 260 job seekers are able to access a number of initiatives delivered in partnership by AWM, the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) and Birmingham city council. These are:

South West Business Connections, led by Birmingham city council

Work for you Project—Partnership project between AWM and Birmingham city council

Working for jobs—initiative involving AWM, LSC and Job Centre Plus

Northfield and Longbridge Uplift Project—led by Birmingham city council

Post Offices: Closures

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what methods will be used to determine those post offices which will qualify for the closure compensation package being offered should more than 2,500 post offices apply. (134208)

Following the Government’s final decisions, it will be for Post Office Ltd. to develop local area plans for proposals for closures and other changes in service provision on a strategic basis within the framework set by Government. As outlined in the consultation document the closure programme will be a compulsory scheme.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what his most recent estimate is of the number of post offices which will close. (134209)

As outlined in the Government’s proposals, compensated closures will be limited to a maximum of 2,500 post offices nationally.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what the reasons are for the deferral of publication of the Government's conclusions on the response to the consultation on the closures within the Post Office network. (134210)

The Department received over 2,500 responses to the public consultation which formally closed on 8 March. We are giving full consideration to the comments submitted and hope to be in a position to announce final decisions in May.

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Bees

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what resources are committed by his Department to survey for bee colony collapse disorder. (133319)

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) whether his Department is monitoring colony collapse disorder in honey bees in (a) the US and (b) Germany; (133303)

(2) what research is being supported by the Government into the threat to UK honey bee colonies of colony collapse;

(3) what steps his Department is considering to prevent the importation of honey bee colonies from countries where incidents of colony collapse disorder have been recorded.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether he plans to fund research into the potential emergence of colony collapse disorder in the UK’s honey bee colonies. (133632)

DEFRA is aware of the press reports about the situation in the USA in respect of the widespread loss of bees described as Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD). Reports of high colony losses have come from at least 22 states.

In the UK, scientists and inspectors at the National Bee Unit (NBU) are monitoring the situation, and are in contact with experts in the USA and in Europe to learn the latest results of research into abnormal colony mortality. The NBU has taken samples for further analysis from the few apiaries in England and Wales found this spring with unusually high colony loss for which there is no readily identifiable cause. This work will help the NBU ascertain whether there is a common cause for such losses.

The DEFRA budget for bee health research and development in 2006-07 is £200,000, which is comparable to previous years, and covers work on all pests and diseases of bees. If findings in the US or elsewhere identify a research need in the UK, the necessary resources would be found as part of our contingency response to emerging new threats.

Colony loss is known in Europe, but there is currently no reason to link high colony losses in the USA to the situation in Europe. Recent cases in Spain and Portugal seem likely to have been caused by Nosema ceranae, a spore-forming protozoan that invades the digestive tracts of bees, as well as the impact of varroa.

If a common cause for high colony loss in the USA is identified and it is pest or disease-related, it is unlikely to be imported here, as long as the rules restricting imports from third countries are respected. It is illegal to import bees from the mainland of the USA.

Bovine Tuberculosis

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps he is taking to increase the (a) speed and (b) accuracy of tests to determine the presence of bovine TB in cattle. (133154)

The single intradermal comparative cervical tuberculin (SICCT) test, commonly known as the tuberculin “skin test”, is the primary screening test for TB in cattle in Great Britain and other parts of the European Union (EU). The skin test is the internationally accepted standard for surveillance for infection with Mycobacterium bovis, and is considered the best screening test currently available for detecting TB in cattle. No diagnostic test is 100 per cent. accurate, but the current skin test is effective.

In October 2006, the Government extended the use of the gamma interferon blood test, alongside the skin test, to improve the sensitivity of the testing regime for controlling disease in infected herds by identifying more infected animals more quickly. It is being applied mainly in herds disclosing TB infection in low risk areas to help ensure infection does not become established in cattle or wildlife. It will also continue to be available for use as a disease control tool in areas of higher incidence.

In line with recommendations from the scientific community, DEFRA continues to fund further research into improved diagnostics for bovine TB.

Domestic Wastes: Waste Disposal

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what estimate his Department has made of the costs and benefits of local authorities reducing the collection of waste bins from domestic residences from once a week to once a fortnight or longer. (133669)

I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Meriden (Mrs. Spelman) on 16 April 2007, Official Report, column 80W.

Fisheries

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether proposed changes to the number and boundaries of sea fisheries committees may proceed only (a) after consultation with and (b) with the support of home sea fisheries committees affected by the proposals. (133771)

As outlined in the current Marine Bill White Paper, I have asked my officials to undertake a review of the number and boundaries of Sea Fisheries Committees (SFCs) in England and to pursue measures in the Marine Bill to implement any change. The review will take place later this year in consultation with the SFCs, the fishing industry and with other interested parties. I will examine the outcome of that review before deciding on any changes to the number and boundaries of SFCs in England.

Fisheries: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what his estimate is of the number of fishermen working (a) full-time and (b) part-time in the UK in each month since January 2006, broken down by region. (133058)

The latest year for which information on the number of fishermen is available is 2005. Details are in the following table.

Number of fishermen by district: 2005

Regular

Part-time

Total

England and Wales

North Eastern

666

32

698

Humberside

801

129

930

Eastern

473

65

538

South Eastern

1,235

47

1,282

South Western

949

71

1,020

Western

1,050

261

1,311

North Western

56

141

197

Wales

796

335

1,131

Total

6,026

1,081

7,107

Scotland

Eyemouth

152

16

168

Pittenweem

107

35

142

Aberdeen

91

72

163

Peterhead

273

0

273

Fraserburgh

614

150

764

Buckie

227

21

248

Scrabster and Wick

157

0

157

Orkney

284

51

335

Shetland

304

147

451

Stornoway

238

249

487

Kinlochbervie

41

2

43

Lochinver

35

10

45

Ullapool

74

6

80

Mallaig and Portree

268

113

381

Oban

163

81

244

Campbeltown

256

69

325

Ayr

529

136

665

Total

3,813

1,158

4,971

Northern Ireland

North Coast

20

5

25

Kilkeel

255

25

280

Portavogie

154

20

174

Ardglass

85

5

90

Total

514

55

569

United Kingdom

10,353

2,294

12,647

Fly Tipping: Bournemouth

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many incidents of fly-tipping were reported in Bournemouth in each of the last four years. (132398)

Flycapture, the national fly-tipping database was set up in 2004 by DEFRA, the Environment Agency and the Local Government Association, to record fly-tipping incidents dealt with by the Environment Agency and local authorities. Data are therefore only available from April 2004 onwards.

Numbers of incidents reported in Bournemouth, in years for which data are available, are shown in the following table:

Bournemouth borough council

Total number of incidents

2004-05

1,479

2005-06

1,784

Data for 2006-2007 are not yet available but will be published this summer.

Graffiti

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much was spent on removing graffiti in each local authority area in each of the last five years for which figures are available. (134216)

This information is not held by my Department. Local authorities (LAs) do not have a duty to clear graffiti and so do not receive funding for its clearance.

Under sections 48-52 of the Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003, LAs can issue a Defacement Removal Notice on the owners, occupiers and operators of land and buildings owned by a statutory undertaker or educational institution and which are accessible or visible to the public. These notices can also be served on objects in or on the public street such as cable boxes, telephone kiosks and bus stops. Once served, the company or statutory undertaker has 28 days to remove the defacement. If the defacement has not been removed after this time, the LA can remove it itself and recover the costs of doing so. LAs are required to make reasonable attempts to enter into partnership with the property owners before issuing any notices under sections 48-52.

Livestock: Disease Control

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much livestock was ordered to be slaughtered by his Department in each year since May 1997 (a) with and (b) without compensation. (133378)

Information on the number of livestock slaughtered for disease control purposes, and the amount of compensation paid, is available in the Chief Veterinary Officer’s Reports. These are available in tables which have been placed in the Library.

Shellfish

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent assessment he has made of the effect on marine conservation of the banning of the landing of berried lobsters. (133770)

Scientific studies suggest that a ban on the landing of berried lobsters and an increase in the Minimum Landing Size (MLS), if equally complied with, would provide similar conservation benefits. However, a ban on the taking of berried lobsters would be almost impossible to enforce, and we know it is likely to be widely ignored. Its potential contribution to lobster conservation may therefore not be realized.

As a MLS can be more effectively enforced and very difficult to ignore, I chose to investigate this option in the interests of getting effective conservation results. We have recently completed a consultation on proposals for increasing the MLS for lobsters and will announce the conclusions from it in the near future.

Waste Disposal: Lighting

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what guidance has been issued to local authorities on disposal of long life bulbs; and whether these bulbs contain mercury. (132584)

Energy efficient light bulbs contain a small amount of mercury (less than 5 milligrams per lamp) and are therefore classified as hazardous waste. They should be disposed of responsibly by local authorities (LAs) and in accordance with waste regulations.

From 1 July this year, long life bulbs, where collected with other waste electrical equipment, will need to be disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Regulations. LAs that register their civic amenity sites as designated collection facilities (DCFs) for WEEE will be entitled to free collection from those sites by producer compliance schemes. Once these bulbs are collected, producers will be responsible for their treatment and recycling. Guidance on the WEEE regulations, including on how LAs can register their sites as DCFs, is available from the Department for Trade and Industry. Guidance on the WEEE treatment requirements was issued by DEFRA in November 2006.

There is increasing evidence that the mercury in each energy efficient bulb is considerably outweighed by the mercury put into the atmosphere through the additional electricity generation required to operate a traditional bulb.

Senior Civil Servants

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the staff turnover rate for senior grade civil servants within the (a) Waste Strategy Division and (b) Waste Management Division was in the last (i) 12 months and (ii) five years. (132275)

The staff turnover rate for senior civil servants within the stated Divisions are as follows:

Waste Strategy Division

Number

(i) Last 12 months

1

(ii) Last five years

2

Waste Management Division

Number

(i) Last 12 months

0

(ii) Last five years

3

Whales: Conservation

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps he has taken to oppose the lifting of the moratorium on commercial whaling; and if he will write in opposition to lifting of the ban to his counterparts in (a) Denmark, (b) other member Governments of the European Union, (c) St. Lucia, (d) St. Vincent and The Grenadines, (e) Antigua and Barbuda, (f) Dominica, (g) Grenada, (h) St. Kitts and Nevis, (i) Solomon Islands, (j) Belize, (k) Toralu, (l) Kinibati, (m) The Gambia, (n) Cameroon and Nauru, (o) other Commonwealth members of the International Whaling Commission and (p) other members of the International Whaling Commission. (131144)

The UK will continue to protest at the highest diplomatic level against the resumption of commercial whaling and we will continue our efforts, along with other countries, to urge those countries that support whaling to reconsider their position.

DEFRA officials ensure that Foreign and Commonwealth Office posts in the relevant capitals are briefed, and engage in discussion with their counterparts on whaling at every appropriate opportunity. This ensures that these countries are in no doubt of the importance that the UK attaches to whale conservation. UK embassies and Ministers across Government will continue to lobby on this issue in the run-up to the next annual meeting of the International Whaling Commission in Alaska in May.

Home Department

DNA Database

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Sheffield, Hallam, of 16 October 2006, Official Report, columns 1042-44W, on the DNA database; if he will break down the information given by police force area. (130330)

The information requested is shown in the following tables:

Table 1: Breakdown of 124,347 CJ arrestee records on the national DNA database by ethnic appearance

6+1 ethnic appearance rating

Force

White European

Dark European

Afro- Caribbean

Asian

Oriental

Arab

Avon and Somerset

296

10

65

27

3

14

Bedfordshire

52

2

14

23

Cambridgeshire

1,363

45

85

91

15

37

Cheshire

1,447

22

15

23

3

8

City of London

34

5

20

18

1

Cleveland

571

2

9

23

7

3

Cumbria

1,833

7

8

16

8

3

Derbyshire

2,526

42

115

149

10

25

Devon and Cornwall

111

1

1

Dorset

1,607

36

45

43

23

29

Durham

660

1

1

1

2

Dyfed Powys

1,653

21

11

31

11

11

Essex

4,320

106

346

123

45

20

Gloucestershire

1,674

19

95

41

9

4

GMP

6,385

94

560

814

68

115

Gwent

409

5

7

6

4

Hampshire

3,390

43

101

101

30

46

Hertfordshire

3,484

103

352

311

34

29

Humberside

22

1

3

Kent

5,617

172

246

217

62

74

Lancashire

3,933

44

67

461

15

26

Leicestershire

1,812

50

215

480

18

51

Lincolnshire

1,360

10

24

24

6

8

Merseyside

130

1

2

1

1

MPS

5,366

828

4,265

1,550

493

362

Norfolk

499

16

19

3

1

3

North Wales

1,569

20

15

15

6

7

North Yorkshire

1,248

9

19

21

1

5

Northamptonshire

475

17

47

19

Northumbria

790

8

7

13

2

5

Nottinghamshire

1,217

7

77

49

4

5

South Wales

1,816

14

59

56

4

18

South Yorkshire

3,510

74

204

254

19

103

Staffordshire

3,879

39

142

259

17

24

Suffolk

92

2

4

2

1

Surrey

1,429

39

118

146

37

53

Sussex

3,067

72

212

177

40

63

Thames Valley

178

4

35

23

2

Warwickshire

257

3

14

20

1

2

West Mercia

6

West Midlands

5,864

148

1,355

1,778

46

175

West Yorkshire

2,132

18

165

444

8

24

Wiltshire

1,266

25

47

36

16

7

Unknown

Total

79,349

2,183

9,208

7,889

1,067

1,370

Visual appearance code

Force

White

Non- white

Unknown

No trace

Total

Avon and Somerset

16

8

14

453

Bedfordshire

108

55

4

258

Cambridgeshire

429

87

666

2,818

Cheshire

5

3

3

1,529

City of London

22

13

11

124

Cleveland

17

4

3

639

Cumbria

172

3

6

2,056

Derbyshire

40

33

10

2,950

Devon and Cornwall

113

Dorset

3

2

10

1

1,799

Durham

721

11

373

1,770

Dyfed Powys

11

6

1

1,756

Essex

551

84

13

5,608

Gloucestershire

28

9

17

1,896

GMP

124

11

83

1

8,255

Gwent

5

1

437

Hampshire

35

29

9

3,784

Hertfordshire

46

14

17

1

4,391

Humberside

3

4

16

49

Kent

406

100

21

1

6,916

Lancashire

235

20

68

4,869

Leicestershire

15

30

4

2,675

Lincolnshire

23

7

12

2

1,476

Merseyside

172

7

5

319

MPS

4,935

6,195

780

2

24,776

Norfolk

82

3

4

630

North Wales

125

5

149

1,911

North Yorkshire

15

2

224

1,544

Northamptonshire

5

139

702

Northumbria

853

40

28

1,746

Nottinghamshire

215

45

56

1,675

South Wales

9

4

12

1,992

South Yorkshire

725

193

15

2

5,099

Staffordshire

25

2

86

4,473

Suffolk

2

12

115

Surrey

6

6

4

1,838

Sussex

75

16

24

3,746

Thames Valley

138

50

9

439

Warwickshire

39

2

18

356

West Mercia

5

9

20

West Midlands

67

35

179

9,647

West Yorkshire

8

1

9

2,809

Wiltshire

6

22

13

1,438

Unknown

2,451

2,451

Total

10,522

7,155

5,593

11

124,347

Notes:

1. 5,604 records include no ethnic appearance information.

2. Total records relating to people arrested, sampled and not subsequently charged or cautioned for the arrest/sampling offence is 124,347.

Table 2: Number of records where a PNC record had been created prior to the arrest and NFA event

6+1 ethnic appearance rating

Force

White European

Dark European

Afro- Caribbean

Asian

Oriental

Arab

Avon and Somerset

46

2

10

1

Bedfordshire

26

1

7

6

Cambridgeshire

397

11

18

16

1

2

Cheshire

318

5

3

6

1

City of London

5

2

3

2

Cleveland

161

1

2

5

Cumbria

528

4

1

6

1

2

Derbyshire

527

2

24

30

1

1

Devon and Cornwall

21

Dorset

347

3

12

2

1

4

Durham

270

1

1

1

Dyfed-Powys

362

3

5

1

Essex

872

12

52

11

3

2

Gloucestershire

325

3

22

6

1

GMP

1,536

13

93

106

2

7

Gwent

109

1

1

2

Hampshire

715

2

12

11

3

Hertfordshire

659

7

62

26

2

Humberside

13

Kent

1,369

18

25

32

2

5

Lancashire

840

7

11

70

1

2

Leicestershire

428

8

28

67

2

1

Lincolnshire

356

2

3

2

1

1

Merseyside

65

1

MPS

1,662

108

932

273

33

54

Norfolk

120

4

1

1

North Wales

442

2

4

3

1

North Yorkshire

264

4

2

Northamptonshire

53

1

5

2

Northumbria

299

1

6

1

Nottinghamshire

335

2

21

10

South Wales

372

2

7

9

South Yorkshire

1,021

10

47

58

4

8

Staffordshire

911

8

29

36

1

1

Suffolk

19

1

Surrey

255

1

7

9

3

Sussex

610

5

22

13

8

Thames Valley

50

13

7

Warwickshire

76

2

3

West Mercia

5

West Midlands

1,227

17

221

241

3

8

West Yorkshire

440

4

25

46

Wiltshire

260

3

8

2

Unknown

1

1

1

1

1

Total

18,717

272

1,742

1,135

60

120

Non-ethnic visual appearance code

Force

White

Non- white

Unknown

No trace

Total

Avon and Somerset

1

60

Bedfordshire

3

1

1

45

Cambridgeshire

53

4

6

508

Cheshire

1

334

City of London

5

17

Cleveland

8

1

178

Cumbria

4

1

547

Derbyshire

2

2

5

594

Devon and Cornwall

21

Dorset

369

Durham

32

2

307

Dyfed-Powys

5

0

1

377

Essex

33

1

1

987

Gloucestershire

4

361

GMP

102

4

28

1,891

Gwent

113

Hampshire

7

6

756

Hertfordshire

5

1

1

763

Humberside

1

14

Kent

28

3

3

1,485

Lancashire

214

17

29

1,191

Leicestershire

5

3

542

Lincolnshire

2

1

1

369

Merseyside

16

1

1

84

MPS

293

156

64

1

3,576

Norfolk

2

1

129

North Wales

26

1

5

484

North Yorkshire

11

2

283

Northamptonshire

4

65

Northumbria

29

1

2

339

Nottinghamshire

33

1

2

404

South Wales

7

397

South Yorkshire

20

5

2

1

1,176

Staffordshire

18

1,004

Suffolk

1

21

Surrey

3

278

Sussex

10

1

1

670

Thames Valley

10

2

5

87

Warwickshire

4

1

86

West Mercia

5

West Midlands

45

18

15

1,795

West Yorkshire

6

521

Wiltshire

5

2

1

281

Unknown

5

Total

1,058

227

184

4

23,519

Notes:

1. NFA—means ‘No Further Action’ taken i.e. the person was arrested and subsequently not charged or cautioned in relation to the arrest/sampling offence.

2. This table shows the number of records where a PNC record had been created for the person before 31 December 2003. This indicates that these persons had previously been charged, reported for summons or sanctioned for at least one previous offence. Sanctions include convictions and cautions (including reprimands and final warnings).

3. Records where the individual was arrested after the ‘arrest and NFA event’ are not included.

Table 3: Number of records where a PNC record had not been created prior to the arrest and NFA event

6+1 ethnic appearance rating

Force

White European

Dark European

Afro- Caribbean

Asian

Oriental

Arab

Avon and Somerset

250

8

55

26

3

14

Bedfordshire

26

1

7

17

0

0

Cambridgeshire

966

34

67

75

14

35

Cheshire

1,129

17

12

17

3

7

City of London

29

3

17

16

1

0

Cleveland

410

1

7

18

7

3

Cumbria

1,305

3

7

10

7

1

Derbyshire

1,999

40

91

119

9

24

Devon and Cornwall

90

1

0

0

0

1

Dorset

1,260

33

33

41

22

25

Durham

390

0

0

1

0

1

Dyfed-Powys

1,291

18

11

26

10

11

Essex

3,448

94

294

112

42

18

Gloucestershire

1,349

16

73

35

9

3

GMP

4,849

81

467

708

66

108

Gwent

300

4

6

4

0

4

Hampshire

2,675

41

89

90

30

43

Hertfordshire

2,825

96

290

285

34

27

Humberside

9

0

1

0

0

3

Kent

4,248

154

221

185

60

69

Lancashire

3,093

37

56

391

14

24

Leicestershire

1,384

42

187

413

16

50

Lincolnshire

1,004

8

21

22

5

7

Merseyside

65

0

2

1

1

0

MPS

3,704

720

3,333

1,277

460

308

Norfolk

379

16

15

2

1

2

North Wales

1,127

18

11

12

5

7

North Yorkshire

984

9

15

19

1

5

Northamptonshire

422

16

42

17

0

0

Northumbria

491

7

7

7

2

4

Nottinghamshire

882

5

56

39

4

5

South Wales

1,444

12

52

47

4

18

South Yorkshire

2,489

64

157

196

15

95

Staffordshire

2,968

31

113

223

16

23

Suffolk

73

2

4

1

0

1

Surrey

1,174

38

111

137

37

50

Sussex

2,457

67

190

164

40

55

Thames Valley

128

4

22

16

2

0

Warwickshire

181

3

12

17

1

2

West Mercia

1

0

0

0

0

0

West Midlands

4,637

131

1,134

1,537

43

167

West Yorkshire

1,692

14

140

398

8

24

Wiltshire

1,006

22

39

34

16

7

Unknown

Total

60,633

1,911

7,467

6,755

1,008

1,251

Non-ethnic visual appearance code

Force

White

Non- white

Unknown

No trace

Total

Avon and Somerset

15

8

14

0

393

Bedfordshire

105

54

3

0

213

Cambridgeshire

376

83

660

0

2,310

Cheshire

4

3

3

0

1,195

City of London

17

13

11

0

107

Cleveland

9

4

2

0

461

Cumbria

168

3

5

0

1,509

Derbyshire

38

31

5

0

2,356

Devon and Cornwall

0

0

0

0

92

Dorset

3

2

10

1

1,430

Durham

689

11

371

0

1,463

Dyfed-Powys

6

0

6

0

1,379

Essex

518

83

12

0

4,621

Gloucestershire

24

9

17

0

1,535

GMP

22

7

55

0

6,363

Gwent

5

0

1

0

324

Hampshire

28

23

9

0

3,028

Hertfordshire

41

13

16

1

3,628

Humberside

2

4

16

0

35

Kent

378

97

18

1

5,431

Lancashire

21

3

39

0

3,678

Leicestershire

10

30

1

0

2,133

Lincolnshire

21

7

11

1

1,107

Merseyside

156

6

4

0

235

MPS

4,642

6,039

716

1

21,200

Norfolk

80

3

3

0

501

North Wales

99

4

144

0

1,427

North Yorkshire

4

2

222

0

1,261

Northamptonshire

1

0

139

0

637

Northumbria

824

39

26

0

1,407

Nottinghamshire

182

44

54

0

1,271

South Wales

2

4

12

0

1,595

South Yorkshire

705

188

13

1

3,923

Staffordshire

7

2

86

0

3,469

Suffolk

1

0

12

0

94

Surrey

3

6

4

0

1,560

Sussex

65

15

23

0

3,076

Thames Valley

128

48

4

0

352

Warwickshire

35

2

17

0

270

West Mercia

5

0

9

0

15

West Midlands

22

17

164

0

7,852

West Yorkshire

2

1

9

0

2,288

Wiltshire

1

20

12

0

1,157

Unknown

2,447

2,447

Total

9,464

6,928

5,405

6

100,828

Notes:

1. NFA—means ‘No Further Action’ taken i.e. the person was arrested and subsequently not charged or cautioned in relation to the arrest/sampling offence.

2. This table shows the number of records where a PNC record had not been created for the person before 31 December 2003. This indicates that these persons had not previously been charged, reported for summons or sanctioned for an offence. Sanctions include convictions and cautions (including reprimands and final warnings). In these cases, the arrest and NFA event is likely to be the first time an individual came to police attention.

3. Records where the individual was arrested after the ‘arrest and NFA event’ are not included.

Drink Driving: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many incidents of drink driving were recorded in each London borough in year since 1997. (132923)

Incidents of drink driving are not recorded centrally as the summary offences of ‘driving etc. after consuming alcohol or taking drugs’ do not form part of the recorded crime series.

Available information on the number of convictions at all courts and those dealt with by written warning, taken from the annual Home Office publication “Offences relating to motor vehicles, England and Wales Supplementary tables”, for the Metropolitan and City of London police force areas, from 1997 to 2004 (latest available) are given in the table.

Data are not available at London borough level. 2005 data will be available later this year.

Number of driving etc. after consuming alcohol or taking drugs1 offences found guilty at all courts or dealt with by written warning within the Metropolitan and City of London police force areas, 1997-2004

Number of offences

Police force area/police action

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Metropolitan police total findings of guilt at all courts

16,165

13,889

12,414

11,801

11,260

12,905

12,621

13,227

Written warnings

18

39

17

7

6

0

5

0

Total

16,183

13,928

12,431

11,808

11,266

12,905

12,626

13,227

City of London total findings of guilt at all courts

436

301

236

162

162

221

230

169

Written warnings

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total

436

301

236

162

162

221

230

169

1 Offences under the Road Traffic Act 1988.

Notes:

1. It is known that for some police force areas, the reporting of court proceedings in particular those relating to summary motoring offences, may be less than complete. Work is under way to ensure that the magistrates courts case management system currently being implemented by the Department for Constitutional Affairs reports all motoring offences to the Office for Criminal Justice Reform. This will enable more complete figures to be disseminated.

2. Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when these data are used.

Golden Arrow Communications

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what meetings his Department's Ministers have held with representatives of Golden Arrow Communications over the last 12 months. (134244)

I refer the hon. and learned Gentleman to my answer of 27 March 2007, Official Report, column 1443W.

Manpower: Home Office

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department which committees and working groups in his Department assess the capacity of prisons in England and Wales. (133423)

The operational capacity of individual prisons is assessed and agreed on behalf of the Secretary of State by Area Managers and the Director of High Security Prisons (within public sector prisons) and by Regional Offender Managers and the Head of the National Commissioner’s Support Bureau (within private prisons).

Prisoner Transfers

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what the average number of transfers from one prison to another was per prisoner in the last year for which figures are available; (133278)

(2) how many and what percentage of prisoners were transferred from one prison to another (a) once, (b) twice, (c) three times, (d) four times, (e) five times, (f) six times, (g) seven times and (h) eight times or more in the last year for which figures are available.

Prisoners: British Nationality

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) British nationals were in prison abroad and (b) non-EU nationals were imprisoned in the UK in each of the last five years. (132745)

Figures on the numbers of both non-European Union prisoners held in prison establishments in England and Wales and the numbers of new detentions of British nationals held in prisons abroad can be found in the table. The Scottish Executive and the Northern Ireland Prison Service respectively hold information on prison numbers in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

The figures on the numbers of British nationals detained in foreign prisons were taken from the answer given by my hon. Friend, Minister of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, to the hon. Member for Sheffield, Hallam (Mr. Clegg) to his question on 16 January 2007, Official Report, column 999W. As at 30 September 2006, we were aware of 2,421 British nationals in detention overseas, either on remand or serving a custodial sentence.

These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems, which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.

Non-EU foreign nationals in prisons in England and Wales

30 June:

Number

2002

6,248

2003

7,359

2004

7,043

2005

7,639

2006

8,554

British nationals in prison abroad1

Number

2001

7,861

2002

6,501

2003-04

6,744

2004-05

5,227

2005-06

4,814

1These are the number of new detentions of British nationals each year, not the numbers held at any given date. The following is a link to show European Union membership http://www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1139991776535

Prisoners: Suicide

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the incidence of suicide and self-harm has been for prisoners serving indeterminate public protection sentences. (133784)

The exact information about indeterminate public protection sentenced prisoners has not been collated in the requested format and can be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many self-inflicted deaths have occurred in prisons since January 2006. (133976)

The number of self-inflicted deaths in prisons between 1 January 2006 and 24 April 2007 is 97.

Prisons: Drugs

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the impact of a switch from soft to hard drugs testing on positive mandatory drug testing rates in prisons; and if he will make a statement. (132974)

The standard group of drugs covered by mandatory drug testing in prisons remains as it was when the programme was introduced in 1995. There has been no switch from soft to hard drugs testing.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the accuracy of mandatory drug testing exercises within prison establishments as a measure of the extent of drug usage in prisons; and if he will make a statement. (132977)

The mandatory drug testing programme provides the best measure of the level of drug misuse. Research conducted by the Office for National Statistics published in January 2005 found that mandatory drug testing provides a good indication of patterns and levels of drug misuse over time particularly at a national and regional level or prison category type.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department for what reasons there is no key performance target for targeted mandatory drug tests for prison establishments; and if he will make a statement. (132985)

All prisons carry out targeted mandatory drug tests. In order to allow prisons to target testing flexibly to meet local circumstances no key performance target has been set.

Solicitor-General

Serious Fraud

21. To ask the Solicitor-General if he will assess the merits of introducing plea bargaining in serious fraud cases. (133949)

When the Government responded to the recommendations of the Fraud Review on 15 March 2007, they indicated that a working group would be established to explore how far it was possible to introduce a framework for plea negotiations in the context of the criminal courts in England and Wales. The group is scheduled to start its work next month, and a symposium chaired by the Attorney-General will be held on 30 April to explore some of the issues.

To ask the Solicitor-General what role he plans for plea bargaining in combating fraud following the fraud review. (133950)

The Government have accepted the recommendations of the Fraud Review that further consideration should be given to the means by which we might introduce a framework for plea negotiations/plea bargaining into our criminal justice system. A working group is being established to engage in detailed consideration of the issues which need to be resolved.

Human Trafficking

23. To ask the Solicitor-General what steps the Crown Prosecution Service is taking to improve prosecution rates in cases of alleged human trafficking. (133951)

Since the introduction of human trafficking offences under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 the number of prosecutions brought to court has increased from 16 in 2004-05 to 116 in 2006-07.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) can only prosecute those cases which are referred to it by investigators. The CPS is working with colleagues in the Home Office to strengthen and improve investigation, law enforcement and the prosecution process against those who commit human trafficking offences.

The UK Action Plan on tackling human trafficking, which was published on 23 March 2007, recognises the need to ensure that human trafficking becomes part of ‘core’ police business by improving the capability of the police and their partners. Actions include the development of ‘key diagnostic indicators’ to measure performance and progress in dealing with human trafficking issues.

The United Kingdom Human Trafficking Centre (UKHTC) is now recognised as the central point for the development of law enforcement expertise. The CPS is working closely with the UKHTC in developing .and taking forward training packages and courses for police, other law enforcement agencies and Crown prosecutors. Training, together with the development of an early victim identification toolkit for front-line police and immigration officers, will enable identification of trafficked victims at the earliest opportunity. This should prevent potential trafficked victims who have committed immigration offences from being removed before providing information or intelligence to investigators.

Crown Prosecution Service: Freemasonry

To ask the Solicitor-General what provisions exist for legally qualified staff in the Crown Prosecution Service to declare freemasonry membership on appointment. (133301)

Fraud: Victims

To ask the Solicitor-General what steps he is taking to ensure that lessons about how to ensure justice for victims of fraud are learned from recent prosecutions. (133946)

My hon. Friend has drawn my attention to a recent case involving two constituents which raises issues about the way our current provisions for dealing with confiscation and compensate operate.

The Fraud Review, commissioned by the Government in 2005, conducted a short survey of fraud victims from a random selection of City of London prosecutions. It was apparent from the survey that victims were predominantly concerned that fraud offences would not be repeated. Victims also hoped to be compensated for their losses, although they had no general expectation that this would happen.

The Fraud Review recommended that the Crown court should have wider powers to deal with the consequences of fraud offences. The Government have agreed that these recommendations need to be considered further, and that consideration will include wider powers to compensate victims of fraud offences. In relation to wider powers the views and experiences of victims will be one of the main considerations.

In giving further consideration to these issues, the Government will consider any lessons we might learn from other jurisdictions.

Honours: Prosecutions

To ask the Solicitor-General whether he would proceed with the appointment of named counsel to advise him on whether prosecutions under the Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925 should proceed if the approval of the Leader of the Opposition were not forthcoming. (134088)

The Attorney-General has previously indicated the arrangements which his Office will put in place if he is consulted by the Crown Prosecution Service in the current “honours” case. These will ensure objectivity, independence and transparency through the appointment of independent senior counsel to consider the CPS conclusions and advise. The Attorney-General has undertaken to consult Opposition spokesmen in an attempt to secure prior agreement on the choice of counsel. A decision on who to instruct will be taken then. If, following this process, a decision is taken not to prosecute, counsel's advice relating to that decision will be made public.

The Attorney-General has made it clear that he will exercise his role independently of Government, in accordance with the law and the evidence. We are clear that our first duty as Law Officers is to the law, not to party politics.

Defence

Aircraft Carriers

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the capability of the Royal Navy to execute carrier-based air superiority missions following the decommissioning of the Sea Harrier; and if he will make a statement. (132853)

The primary function of carrier-borne airpower is the direct support of ground operations, for which the Harrier GR7/GR9 aircraft are eminently suited. In an operation where there is a significant air threat to maritime forces, air defence will be provided by either land-based or coalition aircraft in addition to the sea-based air defence capability. In the future, the Joint Strike Fighter will give the joint force the ability to contribute to the full spectrum of fast jet air operations from either a carrier or a land base.

Armed Forces: Cadets

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what estimate he has made of the proportion of (a) Gap Year Commission and (b) Combined Cadet Force recruits who entered the regular forces in each year since 1997. (131695)

On the subject of Gap Year Commissions, I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 5 February 2007, Official Report, column 687W, to the hon. Member for Sutton Coldfield (Mr. Mitchell).

The information on the proportion of the Combined Cadet Force that go on to join the regular armed forces is not held centrally and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.

Armed Forces: Casualties

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence to which UK (a) military and (b) civilian airports British armed forces casualties are evacuated. (132847)

To establish an appropriate aeromedical evacuation pathway, British armed forces casualties are medically risk-assessed on an individual basis. Most military patients are flown to RAF Brize Norton, Oxfordshire or (in the case of a Hercules aircraft transfer) RAF Lyneham in Wiltshire.

Should the medical risk assessment identify an urgent clinical need, arrangements will be made to fly patients to the most appropriate airfield, either military or civilian, for quick access to the receiving hospital or facility. In most cases, the most appropriate airfield will be the East Midlands Airport to enable rapid transfer to the University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), the main reception centre for Service casualties and home of the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM). However, other civilian airfields have been used occasionally to place patients in the most appropriate place as soon as possible.

In the event of large numbers of patients being repatriated, the destination airfield is defined by the Reception Arrangements for Military Patients (RAMP) agreed from a rota produced by the Department of Health (DH) and Department for Transport (DFT) based on:

Location of available NHS resources and the required treatment for the patients.

The requirement to avoid overloading facilities in any one NHS region.

Type of aircraft and the likely patient load.

Aircraft capability and expected weather conditions.

Armed Forces: Desertion

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence on how many occasions service personnel were recorded absent without leave because NHS hospitals did not notify service authorities of the admission of service patients in each year since 1997. (132626)

Armed Forces: Employment

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many servicemen from the 3rd Battalion of the Parachute Regiment have been granted permission to serve in the private security sector while still a serving member of the armed forces in (a) the UK, (b) Dubai, (c) Iraq and (d) Afghanistan in the last five months; and if he will make a statement. (132843)

No serviceman from the 3rd Battalion Parachute Regiment has either sought or been granted permission to serve in the private security sector while serving in the armed forces during the last five months in any country. Queen’s Regulations for the Army clearly states that such employment is not permitted, This includes personnel who are on terminal leave at the end of their service.

Armed Forces: Housing

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what estimate he has made of the proportion of personnel who do not have a local connection to any local authority for the purposes of applying for social housing on leaving the armed forces. (133144)

Information on the number of Service personnel who do not have a local connection with any local authority for the purposes of applying for social housing is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate expense.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence from whom the house occupied by the (a) Commander-in-Chief Land and (b) Adjutant General is rented. (134154)

As with all service personnel occupying service families accommodation in England and Wales, the houses occupied by Commander-in- Chief Land and the Adjutant General are owned by Annington Homes Ltd and leased back under the terms agreed under the sale of the Married Quarter Estate in November 1996.

Armed Forces: Northern Ireland

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much was spent by his Department to help members of the armed forces living in Northern Ireland with their transition back to civilian life in each of the last three years; how much of that sum was spent on housing; and what personnel were responsible for this task over the same period, broken down by grade. (133117)

The cost of providing third line contracted-out career transition partnership (CTP) services to service leavers using the Regional Resettlement Centre (RRC) at Aldergrove during financial years 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07 was £286,000, £397,000 and £391,000 respectively. These sums cover only the per capita payments made to the CTP contractor, Right Coutts Ltd, for full resettlement service registrations and discharges, and employment support programme registrations and discharges. It does not cover the cost of providing the facilities of RRC Aldergrove to the CTP contractor, or his staffing costs, which cannot be disaggregated from contracted price standing charges for all CTP facility manpower across the UK and Germany.

Neither do these figures include the cost of resettlement services provided in Northern Ireland by single service education and resettlement staffs: such information is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. Moreover, disaggregation of the proportion of time spent on resettlement provision by many who also deliver general education services to service personnel stationed in Northern Ireland would be subjective in the absence of recorded activity. The cost of resettlement training for the service leavers using RRC Aldergrove over this period, and their associated travel and subsistence costs, is not held centrally and could also only be provided at disproportionate cost. However, the maximum sum claimable by service leavers who discharged over this period in terms of individual resettlement training costs grant only would have been in the order of £900,000.

None of the per capita sums represents housing costs.

Since all CTP services are provided under contract, and not directly by the MOD, no MOD personnel were directly involved in delivering services under the CTP contract. Information on the break-down of grade structure of MOD personnel involved in delivering resettlement services at unit or local level could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many members of the armed forces living in Northern Ireland received support to aid their transition back to civilian life in each of the last three years; and how many were assisted with housing issues. (133118)

A total of 2,102 members of the armed forces were discharged through the Regional Resettlement Centre at RAF Aldergrove during financial years 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07, although it is not possible to confirm that all these Service leavers were living in Northern Ireland at the time or subsequently settled in the Province. The breakdown, which does not include serving personnel still moving through the resettlement process, is as follows:

Financial year

Numbers taking up

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

Total

Full resettlement programme

491

615

674

1,680

Employment support programme

194

139

89

422

The personnel moving through resettlement include approximately a further 1,562 Royal Irish (Home Service) redundees who commenced resettlement preparation from 6 January 2006 but have yet to reach their phased exit date. The 1,680 includes 273 RI(HS) who were discharged by March 2007.

Information on the numbers of these Service leavers assisted with housing is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what support is provided to service personnel living in Northern Ireland to aid their transition back to civilian life, with particular reference to housing. (133119)

The Ministry of Defence has set up the Joint Service Housing Advice Office (JSHAO) to provide advice, guidance and support on all aspects of accommodation for those leaving the Services. In addition to this, the Service Leavers Support team provide specific support for Service personnel in Northern Ireland.

These offices provide links to local authorities and Housing Associations throughout the UK and can offer advice on all housing options available. These include applications for social housing, shared or co-ownership schemes, and advice on renting or purchasing a property.

The MOD also provides a Long Service Advance of Pay (LSAP) of up to £8,500 repaid over 10 years and prior to discharge to assist in purchasing a property. This is intended to encourage home ownership for those preparing to leave the Services.

Armed Forces: Recruitment

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) how many Defence Schools Presentation Team visits are planned for 2007; (131699)

(2) what estimate he has made of the percentage of armed forces recruits that can be attributed to the work of the Defence Schools Presentation Teams in 2006;

(3) pursuant to the answer of 7 February 2007, Official Report, columns 922-3W, on Defence Schools Presentation Teams, what assessment he has made of the impact of the Defence Schools Presentation Teams on (a) recruitment and (b) the public understanding of and relations with the armed forces;

(4) pursuant to the answer of 7 February 2007, Official Report, columns 922-3W, on Defence Schools Presentation Teams, what consultation his Department undertook with each of the services when taking the decision to end the Defence Schools Presentations Teams;

(5) whether secondary school teachers will receive training on using the Defence Dynamics programme;

(6) what assessment has been made of the likely effects of replacing the Defence Schools Presentation Teams with the Defence Dynamics programme; and if he will make a statement;

(7) how much time he expects pupils to spend participating in the Defence Dynamic programme in order for that to be considered equivalent to attending a presentation by the Defence Schools Presentation Teams;

(8) whether the Defence Dynamic programme will be compulsory for all secondary schools in the United Kingdom; and how he plans to monitor the use of the programme’s website.

Armed Forces: Surveys

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will place in the Library the most recent Continuous Attitudes Survey for (a) the Army, (b) the Navy, (c) the Royal Air Force and (d) service families. (132630)

With reference to the publication of the Continuous Attitude Surveys for serving personnel, I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 13 March 2007, Official Report, column 201W. The Service families Continuous Attitude Surveys will be published shortly. I will write to the hon. Member when this has been done and place a copy of my letter in the Library of the House.

Defence Dental Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the expenditure was on the defence dental services in each of the last five years. (132621)

Expenditure on the defence dental services (DDS) is presented in the following table. The total is shown as a sum of Direct Resource Expenditure (R-DEL—Salaries and consumable resources) followed by Capital Resource Expenditure (C-DEL—fixed assets) for each year. Indirect DEL (Depreciation etc.) is not included. Prior to 2005, the DDS was a Defence Agency (the Defence Dental Agency).

Figures for the last five years are:

£ million

Financial year

RDEL

CDL

Total

2002-03

40.801

0.900

41.701

2003-04

48.677

1.253

49.930

2004-05

49.466

1.205

50.671

2005-06

52.253

0.445

52.698

2006-071

54.400

1.833

56.233

1 Please note that the figures for the financial year 2006-07 have yet to be finalised.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many defence dental service dental officers were deployed on each operation in each of the last five years. (132624)

The number of times military dental officers deployed on operations in each calendar year is shown in the following table:

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Op Herrick— Afghanistan

16

Op Telic—Iraq

32

24

24

24

Op Palatine— Bosnia

8

8

Op Occulus— Balkans

8

8

8

Op Agricola— Kosovo

4

4

4

4

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many defence dental service dental officers are located at each of the regional defence dental service headquarters in (a) the UK, (b) Germany and (c) Cyprus. (132625)

As of April 2007 there were nine defence dental service uniformed dental officers working as Principal Dental Officer (PDO) located at regional Headquarters in the UK, one in Germany and one in Cyprus.

The primary role of a PDO is to provide higher management to the regional dental centres. However, a number of PDOs also provide primary dental care at a dental clinic within their region.

General Service Medal: Suez

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make it his policy to allow the wearing of the Suez Medal alongside National Service medals; and if he will make a statement. (132998)

Service in the Suez Canal Zone during the post-war years was recognised by the institution of the Naval General Service Medal 1915-62 and the General Service Medal 1918-62, with the clasp ‘Canal Zone’, for service between 1951 and 1954 and the clasp ‘Near East’, for participation in Operation Musketeer during the Suez Crisis of late 1956. There is no officially recognised ‘Suez Medal’.

Similarly, no medal has been instituted for undertaking a period of National Service. National Servicemen could qualify for campaign medals under the same circumstances as their Regular colleagues. It would be divisive to offer National Servicemen a medal for being conscripted, when those who volunteered for service might not have received any award. Accordingly, there are no plans to introduce a new medal specifically for National Service.

Iraq: Peacekeeping Operations

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) how much money was spent on psychiatric aftercare of Territorial Army members who served in Iraq and Afghanistan in each of the last five years; (131630)

(2) how many members of the Territorial Army who have completed tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan have sought psychiatric assistance following demobilisation; what medical support services are provided by the armed forces to members of the Territorial Army on demobilisation; and by what means the Government monitors the health of Territorial Army members following demobilisation.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many members of the Territorial Army (a) are on deployment in (i) Iraq and (ii) Afghanistan and (b) have served in each country in the last five years. (131636)

As of 4 April 2007, there were around 280 Territorial Army (TA) personnel deployed in Iraq and around 260 in Afghanistan. This excludes members of the TA deployed on full-time reserve service.

We estimate that since March 2003 over 10,000 members of the TA have served in Iraq the basis of on mobilisation figures, but exact data is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. We estimate on a similar basis that since May 2006 around 450 members of the TA have served in Afghanistan. Data for service in Afghanistan during the preceding years are unavailable.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what medical services are made available by the armed forces to members of the regular army on the completion of tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. (131638)

Members of the regular Royal Navy, Army, Royal Air Force and Royal Marines have access to a wide range of medical and dental services at all times when they are not on operational deployment overseas. The range of services can be summarised as follows:

Primary Medical Care;

Regional Rehabilitation Services;

Dental Services (including dental hygiene);

Secondary Medical Care at the University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT) where the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM) is based, at NHS hospitals hosting Ministry of Defence Hospital Units (MDHUs) and other NHS hospitals when required;

Rehabilitation Services provided by the Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC), Headley Court;

Community and In-patient Mental Health Services.

Military Equipment: Iran

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what UK military equipment was seized by Iran in (a) 2004 and (b) 2007; and what its value is. (133580)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the value was of United Kingdom equipment seized by Iran in the Iraqi-Iran waterways in (a) 2004 and (b) 2007. (133818)

[holding answers 24 April 2007]: In 2004 the equipment seized by the Iranian authorities consisted of two Combat Support Boats, six rifles and sights, six pistols and ammunition, radios and navigation equipment, global positioning system and maritime charts. The estimated replacement cost was approximately £500,000.

The equipment seized by Iranians during the capture of the 15 Royal Naval personnel in 2007 consisted of two Rigid Hull Inflatable Boats, seven carbines, four rifles, 10 pistols and ammunition, communications and navigation systems, body armour, helmets, goggles and camera equipment. The replacement cost is estimated at around £270,000.

Reserved Forces: National Insurance Contributions

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what estimate he has made of the number of reservists who are overpaying national insurance; and if he will make a statement. (133536)

The change to a new payroll system in April 2007 may impact adversely on the national insurance charge levied on some reservists owing to two or more months’ attendance pay being paid at the end of April 2007. It is too early to quantify the extent of the problem because data are still being input by Units and have yet to be analysed.

Once the extent of any problem has been determined a case will, if appropriate, be made by MOD to Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs for a central adjustment to correct overpayments. Any individuals who believe they have overpaid national insurance can, in the usual way, claim a refund at the end of the tax year.

Culture, Media and Sport

Departments: Oral Questions

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many questions tabled by right hon. and hon. Members to her Department for oral answer have been transferred to other Departments since May 2005. (133800)

Six oral questions tabled by right hon. and hon. Members to the DCMS have been transferred to other Departments between 18 May 2005 and 16 April 2007.

Questions are only transferred to another Department when it is clear that the DCMS is not responsible for that area of policy, and only when the other Department has agreed to answer it. Members are always notified promptly.

Digital Broadcasting: Cheadle

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what estimate she has made of the number of households which will qualify for the targeted assistance scheme for the digital switchover; and how many of those households are in Cheadle constituency. (132496)

Our current estimate is that 7.1 million households will be eligible for the Digital Switchover Help scheme (DSHS) nationally. For the Cheadle constituency, we estimate around 10 000 households will be eligible.

Notes:

Totals are rounded to the nearest thousand.

Eligibility for help from the Digital Switchover Help scheme will be by benefit unit rather than the whole household definition used by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) the Scottish Executive, the Welsh Assembly Government and the Northern Ireland Office to forecast future household growth.

The definition of a benefit unit is a couple and any dependent children. It excludes adults deemed to be non-dependants who, if eligible, will be able to claim assistance from the Help scheme in their own right.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what measures have been put in place to ensure that those eligible for the Targeted Assistance scheme for the digital switchover in Cheadle constituency are contacted by the most appropriate means. (132497)

Using Department for Work and Pensions and local authority data, the Digital Switchover Help scheme operator will write to all eligible individuals well in advance of switchover in their area. This will give options to enable them to continue to receive television services after switchover. Where the scheme operator has information about the particular communications needs of individuals, it will aim to tailor its communications accordingly. In addition, Digital UK will provide generic communications about the Help scheme.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what measures have been put in place to ensure that those eligible for the Targeted Assistance scheme for the digital switchover in Cheadle constituency receive assistance that is appropriate to their individual needs. (132498)

The scheme will contact those eligible eight months before their regional switchover, explaining the choices open to them. It will run a free help line so they can obtain more information. Once a choice has been made, the equipment will be delivered and, if necessary, installed.

Digital Switchover

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport pursuant to the answer of 28 March 2007, Official Report, column 1550W, on digital switchover, whether the figure includes the households of people who are registered as blind or partially sighted but not on Department of Work and Pensions lists. (132183)

We estimate that around 80 per cent. of registered blind and partially sighted people will be over 75 or receive a qualifying disability-related benefit. A further 50,000 people, or 0.7 per cent. of the total eligible households, nationwide may be eligible on grounds of blind or partially sighted registration alone. Our current estimates of the number of households in Whitehaven who qualify for assistance do not include those who qualify on grounds of registration alone but will be within the rounding tolerances given for the Whitehaven estimates.

Energy: Conservation

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport pursuant to the answer of 16 April 2007, Official Report, column 17W, on energy conservation, if she will list the energy-producing features contained in the Government’s Better Public Building initiative. (133578)

The Better Public Building initiative aims to encourage high-quality design in all new public building. It does not itself set standards or recommend specific design solutions relating to energy-producing features. Rather, it sets out principles for good design, which include sustainability, and exemplifies its benefits.

There are therefore no specific requirements for energy-producing features to be incorporated into new build or refurbished buildings within the Government’s Better Public Building initiative. However, alongside energy efficiency and low energy measures, it is encouraged and buildings that do so are championed, for example through the Prime Minister’s Award for Better Public Building. Information can be found at

http://www.betterpublicbuildings.gov.uk/

The section on environmentally sustainable design on pages 8 and 9 of Better public building (December 2006) summarises this position.

Licensing Laws: Urban Areas

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what assessment she has made of the consistency of application of the Licensing Act 2003 by local authorities in urban areas. (133934)

The evaluation of the impact of the Licensing Act 2003 includes a review of the statutory Guidance given to the licensing authorities; the independent review of licence fees, which has included some areas of licensing administration; the impact of the Act on the four licensing objectives; and the DCMS simplification plan published in December last year. The evaluation will not be complete until later this year. It should be noted that the administration of the 2003 Act is devolved by its provisions to local licensing authorities. Local licensing authorities have some discretion to respond to local circumstances and absolute consistency is not an aim of the legislation. Where inconsistency is generated by misunderstanding, the Government have attempted to provide clarification through the statutory Guidance. We expect to publish revised Guidance in the early summer.

Museums and Galleries: Theatre

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many (a) museums and (b) theatres (i) opened and (ii) closed in (A) the United Kingdom, (B) each region and (C) each London borough in each month of the last five years. (132140)

Museums and the arts outside England are devolved matters. Information on local authority funded museums and theatres, or independent museums and theatres, is not held centrally. Four branches of DCMS-sponsored museums have opened in the last five years: The Churchill Suite (April 2003) together with The Churchill Museum (February 2005) at the Cabinet War Rooms, Whitehall, part of the Imperial War Museum and located in the London borough of Westminster; The Museum in Docklands (May 2003), part of the Museum of London Group and located in the London borough of Tower Hamlets; the Imperial War Museum of the North (July 2002) in the north- west; and Locomotion (September 2004) in the north-east, a branch of the National Museum of Science and Industry.

Two branches of DCMS-sponsored museums have closed in the last five years: The Museum of Liverpool Life (June 2006) in the north-west, part of National Museums Liverpool, but with a new Museum of Liverpool scheduled to open in 2010; and the Theatre Museum (January 2007) part of the Victoria and Albert Museum and located in the London borough of Camden.

Two Arts Council England-funded producing theatres have opened in the last five years: Hampstead Theatre (February 2003, London borough of Camden) and the Unicorn (December 2005, London borough of Southwark).

Five Arts Council England-funded producing theatres have closed in the last five years:

Region

Closure

London

The Bridewell (December 2004, City of London) and Southwark Playhouse (September 2006, London borough of Southwark)

North West

Chester Gateway (March 2007), but new performing arts centre scheduled to open in 2010-11.

South East

Gardner Arts Centre, Brighton (March 2007) and The Haymarket Theatre, Basingstoke (January 2007, but scheduled to re-open in September 2007)

Sports: Scotland

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what estimate her Department has made of the likely reduction in lottery funding for grass-roots sport in Scotland due to the funding requirement of the 2012 Olympics. (134133)

Lottery money has always paid for a very wide range of sport projects from kit for local teams to investments in major stadia and sports halls. There is no accepted definition of what constitutes “grass roots” investment or otherwise in this range.

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Africa: Peacekeeping Operations

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what reports she has received from the British ambassador to the United Nations following the Security Council briefing by the African Union Chairman Alpha Oumar Konare. (132586)

My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary chaired an informal private meeting, bringing together all members of the UN Security Council (UNSC) with the UN Secretary-General and African Union (AU) chairperson on 16 April.

Following the meeting the UK, as UNSC president, issued a press statement on behalf of the council, welcoming the Government of Sudan’s acceptance of the heavy support package to the AU mission in Sudan. It also called on the Government of Sudan to facilitate the immediate deployment of the peacekeeping package, as agreed at the Addis Ababa and Abuja summits last November. It was agreed that the UNSC president would write to the UN Secretary-General to request funding for the package from the General Assembly. The UNSC members also called for an immediate ceasefire; a renewed political process; and an improvement in the humanitarian situation.

Democratic Republic of the Congo: Angola

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what reports she has received on the activities of Angolan military forces in territory of the Democratic Republic of the Congo in Kahemba district; and if she will make a statement. (133158)

Angolan forces are currently positioned in Kahemba on what they consider to be Angolan territory. The Congolese and Angolan Foreign and Interior Ministers have had discussions on the disputed territory of Kahemba and are committed to the peaceful resolution of the border dispute. An investigative commission went to Kahemba and will report to the Democratic Republic of the Congo Parliament in due course.

On 15 December 2006 Angola signed up to the Security, Stability and Development Pact for the Great Lakes region. With international partners we continue to call on the signatories to ratify the pact, resolve in a constructive manner their shared security and border problems, and ensure their territory is not used by armed groups to infringe on the sovereignty of others.

Mr. Kiyemba Mutale

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what (a) reports she has received and (b) representations she has made to the Ugandan authorities on the assault of Mr. Kiyemba Mutale on 1 March; and if she will make a statement. (132984)

Our high commission in Kampala is following the case of the alleged People’s Redemption Army suspects closely. We were concerned by the eye-witness and media reports of an assault on Mr. Mutale.

We have not made specific representations to the Government of Uganda about Mr. Mutale's case. However, on 5 March my noble Friend the Under-Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, Lord Triesman of Tottenham, raised our concerns about events on 1 March at the Ugandan High Court with the Ugandan high commissioner in London. Our high commissioner in Kampala, with other EU heads of mission, made representations to the acting Foreign Minister, Henry Okello Oryem, on 2 March, including on the violence used by the security forces, and again most recently with other EU heads of mission on 13 April with Foreign Minister Kutesa. We continue to press all sides to respect the rule of law, human rights and abide by the constitution.

Official Visits

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs which countries do not receive an official welcome from the Government for their Ministers on official visits to the UK. (134091)

Only Ministers who have been invited as guests of the Government receive an official welcome. On arrival in the UK they are met by a representative of my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary.

Sudan

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps her Department has taken to extend the arms embargo established under UN Security Council resolutions 1556 and 1591 in co-operation with the UN Panel of Experts (a) to cover the whole of Sudan and (b) to reflect the full inventory of weapons held by all parties to the conflict. (133490)

At a meeting of the UN Security Council on 16 April chaired by my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary, she made the case for further sanctions to press the Government of Sudan and rebel movements to abide by their agreements. We are discussing a draft UN Security Council Resolution with other Security Council members to extend the UN arms embargo to the whole of Sudan covering arms and related military material. If the Sudanese Government and rebels do not co-operate and fulfil their obligations, we must be prepared to take tougher measures.

Sudan: Peacekeeping Operations

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment she has made of statements by the Sudanese Government that 3,000 United Nations peacekeepers will be allowed into Darfur; whether the deployment is to include (a) attack helicopters and (b) armoured personnel carriers to help African Union forces; under what remit these peacekeepers will serve; and if she will make a statement. (132598)

My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary welcomed the Sudanese acceptance of the UN’s heavy support package (HSP) for Darfur at a Security Council discussion on 16 April. However, it is only a step towards the full African Union (AU)/UN hybrid operation that was agreed six months ago in Addis Ababa. We are now looking to the Sudanese to ensure they honour their commitments through the speedy implementation of the HSP and hybrid force.

The HSP will include attack helicopters. Armoured personnel carriers are provided through a light support package which is already deploying. The HSP will prepare the way for a foil AU/UN hybrid force, as well as reinforce the police and civilian elements of the current AU mission.

Uganda: Armed Conflict

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment she has made of a new ceasefire agreement between the Ugandan Government and the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA); what terms have been agreed between both parties; and what reports she has received from the United Nations Special Envoy Joachim Chissano on his meetings with the LRA leader. (132573)

We are encouraged that the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement between the Government of Uganda and the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) was extended on 14 April. The parties have agreed that the LRA will assemble at a designated assembly point in southern Sudan by 25 May. The Juba peace talks are set to resume today. We call on all parties to remain focused on finding a peaceful resolution to this long-running conflict, and to implement their commitments.

The UN Special Envoy for LRA Affected Areas, former Mozambican President Joaquim Chissano, briefed the our high commissioner in Kampala along with other members of the international community, most recently on 15 April, following his meeting with LRA leaders on 13 April. We will continue to support his efforts.

Uganda: Human Rights

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent assessment her Department has made of the human rights situation in Uganda; and if she will make a statement. (132987)

I refer the hon. Member to the written answer I gave to the hon. Member for Buckingham (John Bercow) on 19 January 2007, Official Report, columns 1409-410W.

We continue to raise our concerns with the Ugandan Government on the issues mentioned in my previous answer. Most recently, we have focused on:

the forced disarmament programme in Karamoja, where there have been serious allegations of human rights abuses; and

events surrounding the detention and treatment of the alleged People's Redemption Army suspects, where the violence used by the government forces at the Uganda High Court on 1 March to frustrate the decision of the High Court to grant the suspects bail had grave implications for the independence of the judiciary, respect for the rule of law and human rights in Uganda.

We will continue to press the Ugandan Government on the need to respect fully human rights.

Zimbabwe: Human Rights

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent representations the Government have made to the United Nations Human Rights Council on (a) political and civil rights, (b) freedom of the press and (c) food provision in Zimbabwe. (132606)

In my address to the Human Rights Council (HRC) on 13 March, I expressed the UK's utter condemnation of the violent repression of peaceful protesters on 11 March. The UK made a statement at the HRC on 29 March expressing our deep concern at events in Zimbabwe. We urged the Government of Zimbabwe to allow its people to express their political views without harassment, intimidation or violence and to repeal repressive legislation that curtails the freedom of the media, expression and association. We also confirmed our commitment to alleviate the suffering of ordinary Zimbabweans caused by the Government of Zimbabwe's misgovernance by continuing to provide humanitarian assistance and food relief.

In addition, we urged the UN special rapporteur for freedom of opinion and expression and the UN special rapporteur on torture to visit Zimbabwe and report back to the HRC at its sixth session, and welcomed the commitment made by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to monitor the judicial process against Mr Tsvangirai and his colleagues.

Also on 29 March, 50 UN member states supported a statement by the EU presidency at the HRC expressing concern at the situation in Zimbabwe and, at our request, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs briefed the UN Security Council in New York on the humanitarian situation in Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwe: Politics and Government

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations (a) she and (b) representatives of her Department have made to (i) Zimbabwean authorities and (ii) the Ugandan authorities on physical attacks on the leaders of the opposition in their countries; and if she will make a statement. (132986)

On Zimbabwe, both my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary and my noble Friend the Under-Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, Lord Triesman of Tottenham, have made statements condemning the violent and unwarranted action taken by that country's Government on 11 March and stating clearly that we hold Mugabe and his Government responsible for the safety of all those detained. The same strong message was delivered to the Zimbabwean ambassador in London when he was summoned by my noble Friend Lord Triesman on 13 March. I also condemned the Government of Zimbabwe in my address to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on 13 March, and both the UK and EU made similar statements of condemnation at the Human Rights Council on 29 March.

We are not aware of any recent physical attacks against leaders of the Ugandan opposition. However, in our contacts with the Government of Uganda and with Ugandan opposition parties, we continue to stress the importance of maintaining a pluralist democracy, developing civil society, and respecting the rule of law.

Constitutional Affairs

Electoral Register: Foreigners

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if the Government will take steps to require foreign individuals who register to vote to prove their nationality. (134189)

All electors are required to state their nationality on the canvass form when registering to vote. Furthermore, electoral registers are available for public inspection and anyone who believes that an ineligible person has been included may object and notify the ERO who may then make further inquiries as to the eligibility of that individual. The Electoral Administration Act strengthened this process by:

Allowing any individual to object to another person’s registration details at any time.

Allowing an ERO to initiate and conduct a review of a person’s registration at any time.

Creating a new criminal offence of supplying false information or failing to supply information to the electoral registration officer at any time.

Giving the police more time to carry out investigations into electoral fraud (they may apply to court to have the normal one year limit for bringing prosecutions increased to two years, so long as there has been no undue delay in the investigation).

Health

Accident and Emergency Departments

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 8 November 2006, Official Report, column 1790W, on accident and emergency departments, in what format data relating to the catchment areas of accident and emergency departments are collected. (131940)

In terms of information on accident and emergency (A and E) departments, national health service trusts self-report the number of A and E services they provide against definitions set by the Department for the three types of A and E. This information is not available at the level of individual hospitals.

Population data are also available at the level of strategic health authorities.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 12 March 2007, Official Report, column 117W, on accident and emergency departments, what the evidential basis is for increasing consensus among professional bodies that a critical size of hospital is required to ensure that specialist facilities are available to treat all patients with emergency needs safely; and what the (a) date of publication and (b) professional body responsible is in each case. (131969)

Reports for example by Collins (1999) “Organisation of acute general services” Joint Consultants Committee, and from the Royal College of Surgeons (2006) “Delivering high quality surgical services for the future—a consultation document from the Royal College of Surgeons of England reconfiguration working party”, make reference to suggested catchment areas for hospitals and services that should be available.

Arun Community Hospital

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when she expects rebuilding work to begin on Arun community hospital; and if she will make a statement on the Government’s policy on community hospitals. (132706)

We are committed to community hospitals where they represent the best solutions for local communities. As such we have set up a five-year, £750 million programme to support the development of community hospitals and services.

The future of Arun community hospital is a matter for the local national health service. I am informed by NHS South East Coast that the future configuration of community hospitals, including Arun community hospital, is a key part of West Sussex primary care trust’s strategy. However, no decisions on the future of community hospitals in West Sussex will be made until the outcome of the “Creating an NHS fit for the future” consultation exercise for West Sussex is known.

Blood: Diseases

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will make it her policy to set up a series of recognised regional sickle cell and thalassaemia screening and care centres based on the model developed for cancer care. (133486)

The implementation of the screening programmes for sickle cell and thalassaemia has raised the profile of the conditions and increased the demand for services with increased numbers of cases being identified. A range of work is in hand to support clinicians responsible for patients with thalassaemia and sickle cell and help to ensure that patients have access to the same quality of care, including neonates identified by the screening programme.

A professional group led by the British Society for Haematology (on behalf of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology), and the United Kingdom Forum on Haemoglobin Disorders and supported by the Department and the voluntary sector has developed national standards for the clinical care of children with sickle cell disease. These guidelines were published in October 2006. Standards for the clinical care of children and adults with thalassaemia in the UK were published in June 2005. The guidelines were sponsored by the UK Thalassaemia Society and endorsed by the Department.

The Department is working with a range of key stakeholders to develop a model of a managed clinical network, to ensure that the potential benefits of the screening programme are achieved and that the complications that require specialist care are managed in the right place with appropriate resources. Ten such networks covering the country are proposed, building on existing expertise, to allow access to comprehensive care to be available across the country.

Care Homes: Fees and Charges

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what account has been taken by her Department of the views of older people living in care homes who are in receipt of the personal expenses allowance in the annual consultation on residential care charges; (132146)

(2) what assessment her Department has made of the impact on the quality of life of older people in care homes of an increase of the personal allowance to £40 per week, as part of its annual consultation on residential care charges.

A number of meetings have been held with key stakeholders representing care home residents, to discuss a range of issues relating to the assessment of resources regulations, including the personal expenses allowance (PEA). Stakeholders involved have included voluntary organisations such as Age Concern, Help the Aged, the Nursing Home Fees Agency, the Relatives and Residents Association and MENCAP. The views of stakeholders will be considered and there will be a further meeting with them before recommendations are put to Ministers.

I have made no assessment of the impact on the quality of life of older people in care homes of an increase of the personal allowance to £40 per week. The PEA was set many years ago at a level that was felt to be appropriate. Since then PEA has been increased annually in line with average earnings. The PEA is provided for care home residents to have money to spend, as they wish, on small items such as on stationery or personal toiletries. It takes into account the fact that people in care homes generally have fewer personal expenses than those living in their own homes. The PEA was increased to £20.45 per week on 9 April 2007.

Cervical Cancer: Vaccination

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether her Department plans to provide guidance on the use of human papilloma virus vaccines in its licence indications. (132823)

The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) has set up a human papilloma virus (HPV) subgroup to examine all safety, efficacy and cost issues relating to HPV vaccines. The subgroup is in the process of examining the evidence concerning the available HPV vaccines, including all the licence indications. The sub group's advice will be reported to the main JCVI committee for further discussion. No decisions will be taken on introducing these vaccines into the immunisation programme until the JCVI has presented its advice to Ministers for their consideration.

Coventry Teaching Primary Care Trust

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much funding Coventry Teaching Primary Care Trust received in each year since 1992. (133683)

Revenue allocations were first made to primary care trusts (PCTs) in 2003-04. Prior to this, funding was allocated to health authorities.

The most recent round of revenue allocations, covering 2006-07 and 2007-08, was announced in February 2005. The table shows the revenue allocations made to Coventry Teaching PCT for this period

Coventry Teaching PCT

Allocation (£ million)

2006-07

425.2

2007-08

469.5

Two year increase

£ million

89.0

Percentage

23.4

The 2003-04 to 2005-06 revenue allocations to PCTs were announced in December 2002. The table shows the revenue allocations made to Coventry Teaching PCT for this period.

Coventry Teaching PCT

Allocation (£ million)

2003-04

289.9

2004-05

318.4

2005-06

348.0

Three year increase

£ million

82.3

Percentage

31.0

Notes:

Comparisons between allocations rounds cannot be made for the following reasons:

Revenue allocations were made to health authorities for the period 2000-01 to 2002-03;

Changes are made to the weighted capitation formula for each allocations round, therefore, comparisons would not be on a like for like basis;

2003-06 revenue allocations were made direct to PCTs, for the first time, and were on a three yearly basis;

2006-08 is the first year that Primary Medical Services (PMedS) were incorporated onto revenue allocations.

General Practitioners

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients were registered with a general practitioner in each year since 1997. (131911)

The following table shows the number of patients registered with a general practitioner (or since 2004 with a general practice) in England in each year since 1997.

Numbers (headcount)

1997

50,917,256

1998

51,117,646

1999

50,898,948

2000

51,336,812

2001

51,254,833

2002

51,524,894

2003

52,713,780

2004

52,527,737

2005

52,817,500

Source:

The Information Centre general and personal medical services statistics.

General Practitioners: Fees and Charges

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will review the appropriateness of the entitlement of general practitioners to charge patients for a letter certifying that they may safely attend a gym. (133155)

General practitioners (GPs) are required to issue specified medical certificates, free of charge. However, GPs also provide a variety of other services which successive Governments have regarded as private matters between the patient and the doctor providing the service. The doctor is free to make a charge for these non-national health service services if he or she wishes. There are no plans to review this.

General Practitioners: Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 19 February 2007, Official Report, column 39W, when she plans to publish audited financial outturn data on the amount primary care trusts have spent on component 2 of the directed enhanced service for practice-based commissioning. (131897)

Final spend figures for component two of the practice-based commissioning directed enhanced service, based on audited annual accounts, will be available in summer 2007.

Health Appointments

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 24 January 2007, Official Report, column 1883W, on health appointments, when the Chair of the Appointments Commission will write to the hon. Member for Sheffield, Attercliffe. (133869)

[holding answer 5 April 2007]: I understand that the Appointments Commission have now written to the hon. Member in response to his earlier inquiry.

Health Services: Mothers

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the adequacy of the level of support offered to women with postnatal health problems. (133682)

No assessment has been made of the adequacy of the level of support offered to women with postnatal mental health problems.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) postnatal care guideline, published in July 2006, recommends a fully personalised plan for each woman, which takes into account her and her baby’s individual needs. The guideline also places great importance on healthcare professionals, taking into account the particular needs of individual families and on having the competencies required for each routine postnatal visit or appointment with the mother or baby, so that they can recognise any signs and symptoms of potentially life-threatening conditions. It recommends that all maternity care providers (whether working in hospital or in primary care) should implement an externally evaluated structured programme that encourages breastfeeding. NICE also made recommendations in its recent guidance to improve services for women who experience mental health problems during or after pregnancy. We expect mental health services available for such women to improve as local services implement the Department’s and the Institute’s guidance in light of their assessment of local need.

One of the key commissioning mechanisms of the framework for Commissioning health and wellbeing, which went out for consultation in March 2007, includes placing emphasis on the importance of primary care trusts and local authorities working together to develop practical and deliverable proposals for improving maternity services including the development of maternity, neonatal and perinatal mental health networks and Children’s Trusts.

Our framework document “Maternity Matters: Choice, access and continuity of care in a safe service” outlines our strategy to deliver and achieve our commitment to give women clinically appropriate choice over the maternity services they will receive. This was published on 3 April and it includes outlining the roles that service providers and commissioners will have in the provision of woman-focused, family-centred maternity services, incorporating the need to commission high-quality, equitable, integrated maternity services as part of maternity, neonatal and perinatal mental health networks according to local need.

Health Visitors: Hampshire

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) head count and (b) full-time equivalent (i) health visitors and (ii) district nurses (A) were working in North Hampshire primary care trusts (PCTs) in each year between 1999-2000 and 2005-06 and (B) are expected to be working in the new Hampshire PCTs in 2007-08; and if she will make a statement. (132351)

[holding answer 24 April 2007]: The following table gives headcount and full-time equivalent numbers of health visitors and district nurses who were working in the predecessor organisations which now form Hampshire primary care trust (PCT). Data is only available for the years 2002 to 2005 and is provided in the following table. Figures for 2006 will be published in the 2006 NHS Workforce Census on 26 April 2007.

National health service hospital and community health services: Health visitors and district nurses in each specified primary care trust as at 30 September each specified year

Headcount

Full-time equivalent

2002

2003

2004

2005

2002

2003

2004

2005

Total specified organisations

498

552

450

417

388

420

325

310

Blackwater Valley and Hart PCT

121

134

100

79

96

103

76

59

Health visitor

59

74

56

49

48

57

43

37

District nurse

62

60

44

30

48

46

33

22

East Hampshire PCT

61

62

60

62

49

50

46

49

Health visitor

41

41

38

39

31

31

28

29

District nurse

20

21

22

23

19

19

18

19

Eastleigh and Test Valley South PCT

49

47

36

37

35

34

26

28

Health visitor

31

31

25

24

22

22

17

17

District nurse

18

16

11

13

13

12

8

11

Fareham and Gosport PCT

68

69

88

71

54

52

58

54

Health visitor

45

44

46

41

33

31

32

29

District nurse

23

25

42

30

21

22

26

25

Mid-Hampshire PCT

24

64

51

55

18

46

36

39

Health visitor

11

47

34

37

8

31

22

24

District nurse

13

17

17

18

11

15

14

15

New Forest PCT

55

56

55

51

43

43

39

38

Health visitor

32

30

33

32

23

20

21

21

District nurse

23

26

22

19

20

23

18

17

North Hampshire PCT

120

120

60

62

92

92

44

43

Health visitor

56

54

43

40

40

39

31

28

District nurse

64

66

17

22

52

53

13

14

Notes:

The drop in figures between 2003 and 2004 has been explained by the trusts as data cleansing across the Hampshire area.

Full-time equivalent figures are rounded to the nearest whole number.

Hearing Aids: Waiting Lists

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the (a) target and (b) actual average waiting time is for people requiring a new digital hearing aid from the point of referral from GP to final fitting of the hearing aid in England. (132238)

The most complex audiology cases will be covered by the target of treatment within 18 weeks of referral by December 2008, and the remaining routine adult hearing loss cases should be assessed within six weeks by March 2008, in line with the diagnostic waiting time milestone on which local commissioning plans are based. It is also good practice for the subsequent hearing aid fitting to be carried out soon after or at the same time as assessment.

The information on actual average waiting time for people requiring a new digital hearing aid from the point of referral to general practitioner for final fitting is not held centrally. However, the median wait for audiology assessments is 23 weeks.

The national audiology framework “Improving Access to Audiology Services in England”, was published on 6 March 2007, and copies are available in the Library. It sets out clear guidance to the national health service on how to reduce waiting times and how to provide the additional 300,000 pathways that are needed in the run-up to December 2008 to make a maximum wait of 18 weeks from referral to treatment possible for all audiology referrals. It aims to mitigate the risk to 18-week delivery and create a sustainable service model for audiology for the long term.

Hospices: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much funding her Department provided to (a) children’s and (b) adults’ hospices in each of the last five years for which figures are available; how much she expects to be spent in future years; and if she will make a statement. (133382)

This information is not available centrally. The level of funding a hospice receives is a matter for local negotiation between the local primary care trust, who are responsible for commissioning and funding palliative care services locally, and the hospice.

The Government have delivered on their commitment to make an additional £50 million per annum available for specialist palliative care for adults. The money is now recurrent in PCT baseline allocations. In April 2007, we announced the allocation of £40 million capital funds for adults’ hospices to improve their physical environments.

In September 2006, a fund of up to £10 million was also announced to support Marie Curie Cancer Care’s major capital modernisation programme of hospices in North London and Birmingham. The business case has been approved, although the final details have yet to be agreed.

Voluntary sector children’s hospices are receiving funding of £27 million between 2006-07 and 2008-09. They have already been given the first tranche of £9 million in 2006-07.

Hospitals: Leeds

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what criteria were used to reach the recent decision to postpone the building of a children’s and maternity hospital in Leeds; and whether she was directly consulted during the process leading up to the decision. (134037)

The national health service in Leeds is committed to providing the highest-quality services, including children’s and maternity services, for the people it serves.

No decision has been made on any part of the Making Leeds Better proposals. The entire health community remains committed to finding a workable solution to improve children’s and maternity services in Leeds.

Yorkshire and the Humber strategic health authority (SHA) has asked Leeds primary care trust (PCT) to review concerns about affordability and to examine all the options available for children’s and maternity services in Leeds. The PCT will present a full project plan to the SHA at the end of April.

Hospitals: Waiting Lists

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 23 March 2007, Official Report, column 1194W, on hospital waiting lists, what assessment she has made of the statistical significance of the moderate correlation between the secondary sector clinical targets and service initial positions in 2003-04 and the age-needs index. (131877)

The distance between several secondary sector service targets and the service initial positions in March 2003-04 is moderately correlated to the age/needs index: the primary care trust health economies with low age/needs had modestly further to travel to achieve the targets. However, numerous parts of the country with low age/needs did not have far to travel in meeting these targets. The correlation is not a perfect one (with correlation co-efficients ranging from -0.28 in the case of distance to the accident and emergency four hour wait and age/needs to -0.13 in the case of distance to the out-patient booking targets and age/needs). The reasons behind the relationship are complex.

Secondary sector under-performance in low age/needs areas is likely to have existed for some time prior to March 2003-04. By raising the quality of care to uniform national standards, the Government have significantly improved the services provided to patients in these areas.

The age and need indices, and the interactions between them, are currently being reviewed by independent academic researchers under the auspices of the Advisory Committee on Resource Allocation. A new age and need adjustment for weighted capitation may emerge from this research for resource allocation in 2008-09.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average waiting time was for (a) in-patient, (b) day case and (c) out-patient appointments at each hospital in London in (i) 1992, (ii) 1997, (iii) 2001, (iv) 2005 and (v) the most recent year for which figures are available. (132331)

The information requested can be found in the following table.

Table 1: Provider based median waiting time information, London NHS Trusts

Median waiting time (weeks) month end

March 1992

March 1997

Organisation code

Organisation

In-patient admission ordinary

In-patient admission daycase

Out-patient appointment

In-patient admission ordinary

In-patient admission daycase

Out-patient appointment

RA1

Epsom Healthcare NHS Trust

8.4

7.8

n/a

16.6

10.7

3.3

RAK

Royal London Hospital and Associated Community Services NHS Trust

12.3

8.5

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RAX

Kingston Hospital NHS Trust

14.2

10.4

n/a

20.6

12.3

4.6

RAZ

St. Helier NHS Trust

15.3

10.8

n/a

17.2

9.6

3.6

RAV

The Guy’s and Lewisham NHS Trust

15.3

10.9

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RAP

North Middlesex Hospital NHS Trust

15.6

9.9

n/a

25.0

11.8

7.5

RAL

Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust

17.5

16.1

n/a

15.2

9.8

5.8

RAN

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust London)

18.2

12.6

n/a

11.6

9.2

12.3

RAU

Central Middlesex Hospital NHS Trust

23.6

8.3

n/a

17.8

9.1

6.7

RAR

Mount Vernon Hospital NHS Trust

25.2

23.7

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RAS

Hillingdon Hospital NHS Trust

25.2

8.6

n/a

19.4

9.4

7.2

RC3

Ealing Hospital NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

19.6

11.8

6.1

RF4

Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RFW

West Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

21.2

11.5

7.3

RG2

Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

16.4

9.7

5.9

RG3

Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

19.6

13.3

8.1

RGC

Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RGZ

Queen Mary’s Sidcup NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

22.5

10.9

8.4

R31

Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

19.3

15.7

7.2

R32

Lewisham Hospital NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

13.6

11.7

6.9

RJ5

St. Mary’s NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

19.5

10.6

6.9

R36

Mayday Healthcare NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

23.9

12.5

4.2

RJ7

St. George’s Healthcare NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

16.3

10.2

5.0

RJZ

King’s College Hospital NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

19.4

20.4

5.9

RKE

Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

19.9

9.2

5.0

RKL

West London Mental Health NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RNH

Newham Healthcare NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

13.1

8.9

7.1

RNJ

Barts and the London NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

17.5

10.4

7.5

RNK

Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

9.1

RP4

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

11.0

9.0

4.8

RP6

Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

13.2

12.5

8.5

RPY

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

2.6

ROM

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

9.8

8.5

3.8

RON

Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

23.9

21.9

4.5

ROX

Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

9.4

8.1

4.5

ROY

SW London and St. George’s NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

3.2

RRV

University College London NHS Foundation Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

14.5

11.3

5.1

RT3

Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RV3

Central and North West London Mental Health NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RV8

North West London Hospitals NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RVL

Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RVR

Epsom and St. Helier NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RWK

East London and The City Mental Health NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RC5

Harefield Hospital NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

10.1

10.4

3.9

RDC

Wellhouse NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

21.2

11.3

6.5

RDF

Forest Healthcare NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

22.5

17.5

9.3

RFZ

Northwick Park and St. Mark’s NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

17.5

11.6

6.8

RG4

Redbridge Health Care NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

22.5

20.1

3.9

RG7

Havering Hospitals NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

15.8

10.4

7.6

RG9

Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

21.9

16.8

7.0

RHG

Richmond Twickenham and Roehampton Healthcare NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

21.2

10.7

3.2

RPX

Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

13.6

14.2

2.0

R09

Bethlem and Maudsley NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

13.8

n/a

3.7

RV5

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Median waiting time (weeks) month end

March 2001

March 2005

Organisation code

Organisation

In-patient admission ordinary

In-patient admission daycase

Out-patient appointment

In-patient admission ordinary

In-patient admission daycase

Out-patient appointment

RA1

Epsom Healthcare NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RAK

Royal London Hospital and Associated Community Services NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RAX

Kingston Hospital NHS Trust

17.1

12.4

6.1

9.7

8.2

6.6

RAZ

St. Helier NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RAV

The Guy’s and Lewisham NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RAP

North Middlesex Hospital NHS Trust

18.7

19.0

11.9

10.7

7.8

7.7

RAL

Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust

18.3

10.8

8.0

9.1

8.1

7.8

RAN

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust London)

12.4

10.8

9.8

13.4

10.1

11.8

RAU

Central Middlesex Hospital NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RAR

Mount Vernon Hospital NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RAS

Hillingdon Hospital NHS Trust

12.2

8.3

8.8

10.1

6.6

7.4

RC3

Ealing Hospital NHS Trust

16.4

11.2

7.3

10.2

8.0

8.8

RF4

Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

12.4

8.6

9.0

RFW

West Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust

26.5

9.8

5.0

13.1

7.9

6.1

RG2

Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Trust

15.8

9.7

7.2

11.7

6.4

5.8

RG3

Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust

18.3

17.3

6.3

12.0

8.4

7.1

RGC

Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

11.7

10.4

8.4

RGZ

Queen Mary’s Sidcup NHS Trust

24.7

14.3

9.1

11.0

9.6

8.0

R31

Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust

19.7

16.6

10.5

10.1

7.4

8.4

R32

Lewisham Hospital NHS Trust

21.8

9.3

7.3

7.9

8.7

7.6

RJ5

St. Mary’s NHS Trust

13.7

9.1

7.5

8.3

6.6

7.9

R36

Mayday Healthcare NHS Trust

26.4

11.7

7.0

9.3

7.8

7.7

RJ7

St. George’s Healthcare NHS Trust

18.2

9.5

7.7

10.6

7.4

6.5

RJZ

King’s College Hospital NHS Trust

18.0

10.8

6.2

9.3

6.4

6.8

RKE

Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

11.4

9.0

5.7

7.0

5.5

6.4

RKL

West London Mental Health NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

6.3

RNH

Newham Healthcare NHS Trust

15.1

9.3

7.6

9.9

6.6

6.9

RNJ

Barts and the London NHS Trust

18.2

10.5

9.9

8.0

5.6

8.9

RNK

Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust

n/a

n/a

8.5

n/a

n/a

7.5

RP4

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust

12.5

10.9

9.0

7.5

6.7

5.9

RP6

Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

9.0

12.5

6.0

5.2

6.0

11.4

RPY

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

n/a

n/a

2.4

3.4

n/a

2.4

ROM

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

11.9

10.5

5.9

9.2

9.0

5.7

RON

Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust

12.5

8.3

3.6

9.9

8.3

7.4

ROX

Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

7.8

7.4

6.6

4.0

3.9

4.4

ROY

SW London and St. George’s NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

3.4

n/a

n/a

3.2

RRV

University College London NHS Foundation Trust

11.9

8.4

6.9

8.6

7.2

6.5

RT3

Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust

18.0

16.6

4.5

6.4

8.0

3.9

RV3

Central and North West London Mental Health NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

5.9

n/a

n/a

4.8

RV8

North West London Hospitals NHS Trust

18.2

11.0

7.0

11.8

9.8

9.4

RVL

Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust

20.4

11.1

8.6

13.7

11.6

8.3

RVR

Epsom and St. Helier NHS Trust

18.8

11.6

6.6

12.6

6.

7.7

RWK

East London and The City Mental Health NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

5.1

n/a

n/a

7.0

RC5

Harefield Hospital NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RDC

Wellhouse NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RDF

Forest Healthcare NHS Trust

22.3

17.8

10.3

n/a

n/a

n/a

RFZ

Northwick Park and St. Mark’s NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RG4

Redbridge Health Care NHS Trust

20.3

15.7

7.4

n/a

n/a

n/a

RG7

Havering Hospitals NHS Trust

17.8

11.5

9.4

n/a

n/a

n/a

RG9

Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RHG

Richmond Twickenham and Roehampton Healthcare NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RPX

Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

R09

Bethlem and Maudsley NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

RV5

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

9.5

n/a

3.3

n/a

n/a

n/a

Median waiting time (weeks) month endDecember 2006Organisation codeOrganisationIn-patient admission ordinaryIn-patient admission daycaseOut-patient appointmentRA1Epsom Healthcare NHS Trustn/an/an/aRAKRoyal London Hospital and Associated Community Services NHS Trustn/an/an/aRAXKingston Hospital NHS Trust6.88.74.7RAZSt. Helier NHS Trustn/an/an/aRAVThe Guy’s and Lewisham NHS Trustn/an/an/a RAPNorth Middlesex Hospital NHS Trust10.710.65.6 RALRoyal Free Hampstead NHS Trust8.66.95.8RANRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust London)8.48.58.7RAUCentral Middlesex Hospital NHS Trustn/an/an/aRARMount Vernon Hospital NHS Trustn/an/an/aRASHillingdon Hospital NHS Trust8.05.55.1RC3Ealing Hospital NHS Trust8.47.55.2RF4Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust11.39.27.7RFWWest Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust7.06.06.0RG2Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Trust12.06.76.6RG3Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust10.67.85.3RGCWhipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust9.38.66.9RGZQueen Mary’s Sidcup NHS Trust10.58.54.0R31Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust8.56.98.1R32Lewisham Hospital NHS Trust9.48.76.8RJ5St Mary’s NHS Trust15.515.85.8R36Mayday Healthcare NHS Trust6.76.56.2RJ7St. George’s Healthcare NHS Trust8.36.44.8RJZKing’s College Hospital NHS Trust8.37.34.6RKEWhittington Hospital NHS Trust9.07.04.6RKLWest London Mental Health NHS Trustn/an/a4.6RNHNewham Healthcare NHS Trust10.29.34.4RNJBarts and the London NHS Trust8.57.08.0RNKTavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trustn/an/a7.2RP4Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust7.86.94.7RP6Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trustn/a7.78.9RPYRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust2.6n/a2.0ROMChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust9.28.76.0RONHammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust7.98.14.9ROXHomerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust7.35.74.5ROYSW London and St. George’s NHS Trustn/an/a2.6RRVUniversity College London NHS Foundation Trust8.97.34.9RT3Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust7.15.64.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients in London waited for (a) 18 months and over, (b) 12 months and over and (c) six months and over for out-patient admission in each quarter of each of the last five years in each primary care trust. (132333)

The information requested is not held centrally. The Department has not collected information on waits of over 26 weeks for out-patients since March 2004, as the current target is only 13 weeks. However, the following table shows how many patients waited over 26 weeks for out-patient admission in each London primary care trust (PCT) from 2002 to 2004.

Number waiting over 26 weeks for an out-patient appointment. June 2002 to March 2004, commissioner based

Number waiting over 26 weeks, month end:

Organisation

June 2002

September 2002

December 2002

March 2003

June 2003

September 2003

December 2003

March 2004

Havering PCT

11

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Kingston PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Bromley PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Greenwich PCT

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

Barnet PCT

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Hillingdon PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Bexley PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Enfield PCT

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Barking and Dagenham PCT

9

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

City and Hackney PCT

19

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Tower Hamlets PCT

24

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

Newham PCT

70

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

Haringey PCT

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Hammersmith and Fulham PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Ealing PCT

25

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

Hounslow PCT

0

19

0

0

0

0

0

0

Brent PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Harrow PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Camden PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Islington PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Croydon PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Kensington and Chelsea PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Westminster PCT

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

Lambeth PCT

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Southwark PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Lewisham PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Wandsworth PCT

0

4

0

0

0

1

0

0

Richmond and Twickenham PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Sutton and Merton PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Walthamstow, Leyton and Leytonstone PC

30

0

0

0

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Chingford, Wanstead and Woodford PCT

39

0

0

0

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Redbridge PCT

36

0

0

0

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Redbridge PCT (new)

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

0

0

0

0

Waltham Forest PCT

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

0

0

0

0

Note:

In the financial year 2003-04 Chingford, Wanstead and Woodford PCT divided, part joined Redbridge PCT, which kept its name (and is differentiated from the old PCT using the name Redbridge PCT (new)). The other part joined Walthamstow, Leyton and Leytonshire PCT to become Waltham Forest PCT.

Source:

Department of Health, QMO8r

Injuries: Offensive Weapons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) gun-shot and (b) knife wound injuries were treated in hospitals in each of the last five years. (132317)

Information is not collected on the number of gun shot and knife wound injuries treated in hospitals.

Information is available, however, on patients who were actually admitted to hospital for gun shot and knife injuries (these figures do not include patients who were treated in accident and emergency departments for gun shot/knife injuries and not admitted). Those cause codes that appear relevant to the question are presented in the table as follows.

Count of finished admission episodes for gun shot and knife wound injuries 2001-02 to 2005-06, national health service hospitals, England

2005-06

2004-05

2003-04

2002-03

2001-02

W32

Handgun discharge

44

38

68

68

68

W33

Rifle shotgun and larger firearm discharge

73

68

95

71

100

X72

Intentional self-harm by handgun discharge

10

15

7

11

12

X73

Intent self-harm by rifle shotgun and larger firearm discharge

17

7

6

7

14

X93

Assault by handgun discharge

44

37

49

47

42

X94

Assault by rifle shotgun and larger firearm discharge

51

51

50

56

64

Y22

Handgun discharge undetermined intent

9

9

6

9

7

Y23

Rifle shotgun and larger firearm discharge undetermined intent

11

7

19

17

17

Total

259

232

300

286

324

W26

Contact with knife sword or dagger

5,321

4,939

4,872

4,842

4,672

Notes:

Finished admission episodes

A finished admission episode is the first period of in-patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. Please note that admissions do not represent the number of in-patients, as a person may have more than one admission within the year.

Cause code

The cause code is a supplementary code that indicates the nature of any external cause of injury, poisoning or other adverse effects.

Ungrossed data

Figures have not been adjusted for shortfalls in data (i.e. the data are ungrossed).

Source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), The Information Centre for health and social care.

Mentally Disturbed Offenders

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what estimate she has made of the number of people suffering from (a) personality disorder and (b) dangerous and severe personality disorder; (133046)

(2) how many people are (a) detained and (b) receiving treatment for (i) personality disorder and (ii) dangerous severe personality disorder.

[holding answer 20 April 2007]: Personality disorders are common conditions, with a considerable variation in the severity and degree of distress and dysfunction caused. An independent study, “The Epidemiology of Personality Disorders” by Dr. Paul Moran, in 2002 reported a prevalence rate of personality disorder amongst adults in the community of 10 to 13 per cent. However, this estimate is for all personality disorders, and a separate prevalence rate for dangerous and severe personality disorder (DSPD) was not made in the Moran study.

Approximately 250 to 300 people are being treated and supported by established specialist national health service personality disorder services, without any form of detention, and an additional 1300 people in new medium secure, community forensic and non-forensic pilot services. Of the latter, about 50 people at any one time will be undergoing in-patient assessment or treatment under sections of the Mental Health Act. There are 40 secure places within forensic mental health services for people with personality disorder who need treatment under detention. A further 400 male patients are detained on court orders under the legal category of psychopathic disorder in secure psychiatric hospitals.

DSPD is not a clinical diagnosis but a description of a patient profile for those whose personality disorder is of an acuteness or severity and risk to indicate they are likely to be the most serious threat to others. There are an estimated 2,000 to 2,500 individuals in the prison population who meet DSPD criteria. Although there are no existing research data on the number of people with DSPD in the community, further work has been commissioned to provide prospective data about the size of this group, which are expected to be available later this year.

DSPD pilot services are provided within Rampton and Broadmoor high secure hospitals and Her Majesty’s Prisons at Whitemoor, Frankland and Low Newton. The current figures for those receiving assessment and treatment within these services is 66 in the national health service and 143 in the prison estate. All are detained, with a majority serving current prison sentences.

MRSA

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what techniques and procedures are being used to combat MRSA in NHS hospitals; what use is being made of hydrogen peroxide; how widely it is being used for this purpose; and if she will make a statement. (132757)

[holding answer 23 April 2007]: As part of the Saving Lives programme, which is designed to support national health service trusts in reducing healthcare associated infections like methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), high impact interventions have been developed. The high impact interventions are simple evidence based tools. They reinforce the practical actions that clinical staff need to undertake every time for key procedures in order to significantly reduce healthcare-associated infections including MRSA. They cover preventing the risk of microbial contamination (which includes hand hygiene, personal protective equipment, aseptic technique and safe disposal of sharps), central venous catheter care, peripheral line care, renal dialysis catheter care, preventing surgical site infection, care of ventilated patients and urinary catheter care.

The Department also published enhanced advice on screening, including decolonisation, in November 2006.

The Rapid Review Panel (RRP) has reviewed two hydrogen peroxide vapour products and recommended that both products have potential value and that in use trials are now needed. Trials have been undertaken within the national health service and these products have been utilised in outbreak situations.

It is not known how widely hydrogen peroxide vapour is used in the NHS. The NHS does not collect data regarding the usage of products by individual trusts or collectively for the NHS. NHS trusts are free to choose which products to purchase and will maintain their own records.

The Department is liaising with all the bodies which play a role in the assessment of innovative products about how the Department might best assist the take-up of products that have a favourable RRP recommendation. Discussions are at an early stage. Ultimately, they will include how innovative products are assessed for cost-effectiveness and their impact on services, thus creating a more streamlined process.

NHS: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much has been awarded by her Department under “Our health, our care, our community” since July 2006, broken down by (a) strategic health authority and (b) primary care trust; how many bids have been submitted; what the final period is for the submission of bids; and if she will make a statement. (126426)

Ten proposals were received in wave 1. An announcement about four of these was made on the 21 December. Two of the schemes were withdrawn, one did not meet the criteria and we are resolving an outstanding query on one of the schemes. Two of the schemes were carried forward and announced with the second wave.

The funding allocated to these four schemes totals £44.5 million, and the following chart breaks this down into strategic health authority (SHAs) and primary care trust (PCT) area, and the amount allocated to each scheme.

SHA

PCT

Amount awarded (£ million)

North East

Sunderland (Washington Primary care centre)

8.96

South Central

Hampshire (Gosport War Memorial Hospital)

6.122

South West

South Gloucestershire (Yate Community Health Centre)

5

South West

Somerset (West Somerset Healthy Living Park)

24.5

Total

44.58

Decisions are still outstanding on the following schemes.

SHA

PCT

Amount requested (£ million)

Outstanding from wave one

East Midlands

Lincolnshire (Stamford and Rutland Hospital)

0.5

Outstanding from wave two

North East

Hartlepool (Primary care centre—Hartlepool)

7.25

North East

Berwick upon Tweed (Community Hospital Berwick)

24.701

Yorkshire and Humber

North East Lincolnshire (Primary care centre—Grimsby)

2.225

Yorkshire and Humber

North Yorkshire and York (New Community campus—Selby War Memorial Hospital)

3.65

South West Peninsula

Gloucestershire (New community services—Bourton and Moreton)

13.23

South West Peninsula

Gloucestershire (New facilities for community services—Berkley Vale)

6.46

South West Peninsula

Gloucestershire (Refurbishment—Cirencester Hospital)

0.25

South West Peninsula

Gloucestershire (Refurbishment—Stroud Hospital)

1.1

South West Peninsula

South Gloucestershire (Community Hospital—Kingswood)

16.99

South West Peninsula

Bath and North East Somerset (Community care centre—Keynsham)

6.51

South West Peninsula

North Somerset (Redevelopment—Clevedon Hospital)

15.13

South West Peninsula

Somerset (Redevelopment—South Petherton Hospital)

15.32

South West Peninsula

Wiltshire (Redevelopment Chippenham Hospital)

17.85

South West Peninsula

Wiltshire (Primary Care Centre—Salisbury)

32.92

South West Peninsula

Wiltshire (Primary Care Centre—Salisbury)

11.6

South West Peninsula

Bournemouth and Poole (Community hospital Boscombe)

7.17

South West Peninsula

Torbay (Redevelopment—Brixham Hospital)

10.34

Total

193.20

Twenty-five schemes were submitted in wave 2. We approved and announced details of 10 schemes, including two that were carried forward from wave 1, on 11 April.

The schemes announced on 11 April are listed in the following table.

SHA

PCT

Amount awarded (£ million)

South Central

Southampton City (Royal South Hampshire Hospital)

6.079

East of England

Suffolk (Felixstowe Community Hospitals)

1.76

London

Barking and Dagenham (Barking Hospital)

5

London

Richmond and Twickenham (New health and social care centre—Teddington Memorial Hospital)

3.98

London

Haringey (Hornsey Central Hospital)

1.6

Yorkshire and Humber

Calderdale and Kirklees (Redevelopment of Sites—Huddersfield)

12.91

Yorkshire and Humber

Rotherham (Primary care centre—Rotherham)

0.961

East Midlands

Nottinghamshire County (Redevelopment of Ashfield Hospital)

1.149

South West

Bristol (South Bristol Community Hospital)

3.9

South East Coast

Hastings and Rother (Station Plaza Primary Health Centre)

12

Total

49.34

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when she expects the group tasked with the review of general medical services funding to report on its findings and recommendations. (131933)

The report of the general medical services global sum formula review group, which contains a number of recommendations on changes to the current formula, is now available. The report is currently out for consultation until 11 May. A copy of the report has been placed in the Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what (a) total expenditure on enhanced services under the General Medical Services contract and (b) the total primary care trust enhanced services expenditure floor was expected to be in (i) 2005-06 and (ii) 2006-07; what actual expenditure on enhanced services was in 2005-06; and what expenditure on enhanced services she expects in 2006-07. (131962)

Total expenditure on enhanced services under the new general medical services contract (over the period 2004-05 to 2006-07) is estimated to be £2,067 million.

In 2005-06, the total primary care trust (PCT) enhanced services floor was £676 million. For 2006-07, it was agreed with the British Medical Association’s General Practitioner Committee that enhanced services floors would be frozen at 2005-06 levels.

The overall level of investment by PCTs in 2005-06 is £655 million (based on their audited annual accounts). Forecasts received from PCTs for 2006-07 indicates an overall spend on enhanced services of £824 million.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when she plans to launch the £50 million advertising campaign to tackle sexually transmitted infections announced on 26 November 2004. (131905)

The Department’s new adult sexual health campaign, “Condom Essential Wear”, was launched in November 2006. Approximately £6 million was spent on the campaign in the last financial year on a combination of TV, cinema, radio, press and digital advertising backed by extensive public relations, partnership marketing and the creation of two bespoke websites.

Funding for the campaign, which targets some of the hardest to reach young people who are at risk of contracting a sexually transmitted infection, has been agreed at £4 million for the financial year 2007-08. It is too early to say what the funding levels will be for 2008-09.

Young People: Drugs

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the potential impact on young people of the proposed changes to funding for drug and alcohol action teams. (133476)

I have been asked to reply.

Drug use among young people is assessed through the Schools Survey and British Crime Survey. Class A drug use is stable and there have been significant reductions in frequent use of any drug by young people. The Government are making £55 million available in 2007-08 to support prevention, early intervention and treatment services for young people experiencing problems with drugs to be used alongside mainstream funding.

Prime Minister

Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925

To ask the Prime Minister if he will review the operation of the Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925. (134090)

I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave the hon. Member for Lewes (Norman Baker) on 26 January 2006, Official Report, column 2271W.

Deputy Prime Minister

Departments: Paper

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what percentage of paper used (a) for photocopying and (b) in printed publications by his Department was from recycled sources in each of the last three years. (134047)

All the paper used in my Office since its establishment in May 2006 has been from 100 per cent. recycled sources.

Departments: Parliamentary Questions

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many questions tabled by hon. and right hon. Members to his Department for oral answer have been transferred to other departments since May 2005. (133794)

No oral questions have been transferred to other departments since the establishment of my Office in May 2006.

Duchy of Lancaster

Employment Agencies: EC Action

To ask the Minister without Portfolio what responsibilities she has for (a) the Agency Workers Directive and (b) other EU legislation. (134212)

As part of my cross-cutting ministerial role, I am involved in the consideration of specific policy issues as appropriate.

European Parliament

To ask the Minister without Portfolio for what purpose she visited the European Parliament on 11 April. (134211)

I visited Brussels on 10 April to undertake meetings on the Agency Workers Directive. My visit to the European Parliament on 11 April was not made in my ministerial capacity.

Legislation

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many pages of new primary legislation were enacted in each year since 1997. (133219)

Statistical information on the number of pages of legislation broken down on a calendar year basis can be found in Standard Note SN/SG/2911 “Acts and Statutory Instruments: Volume of UK legislation 1950 to 2006” and is available in the Library for the reference of Members. It can also be obtained on line at:

http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/notes/snsg-02911.pdf.

Primary Care Trusts

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster pursuant to the answer of 26 March 2007, Official Report, column 1349W, on primary care trusts (PCTs), what the reasons were for the selection of each PCT visited last year; which Ministers have received copies of the resulting reports; and to whom copies of these reports were circulated. (134147)

Within the last year, the Prime Minister’s Delivery Unit (PMDU) has carried out eight reviews on different governmental delivery and reform priorities, which involved visits to 35 primary care trusts (PCTs). For each review a number of sites were chosen to ask front line staff about their experience of delivery and the issues they face. The sites were chosen on the basis of a PCTs characteristics (e.g. urban or rural populations) and local circumstances.

The final reports that were produced following each of these reviews were developed jointly with the Department of Health, and act as confidential advice to the Prime Minister, Department of Health Ministers and Secretary of State. Each report was circulated by the PMDU to the Prime Minister. In addition, the Department of Health lead official for each review also circulated the report to relevant senior officials within the Department of Health and to relevant Ministers and/or Secretary of State.

Only one of the eight reviews involved three Government Departments, and as such was therefore shared with the senior officials, and Ministers/Secretaries of State, as appropriate from the Department of Health, Department for Education and Skills, and the Department for Culture Media and Sport.

Training: Treasury

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster pursuant to the answer of 14 March 2007, Official Report, column 355W, on training: Treasury, which Ministers attended each listed course. (133421)

I refer the hon. Member to the letter sent to him by the National School of Government’s principal and chief executive on 15 March 2007 which sets out detailed information on the number of Ministers participating in the learning and development provided by the National School. A copy of the letter is available in the Library for the reference of Members. It would not be appropriate to release the more detailed information you requested.

International Development

Armed Conflict: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what funding and resources (a) were committed in each of the last three financial years and (b) are pledged for each of the next three financial years for the global conflict prevention pool, broken down by regional pool. (134126)

I have been asked to reply.

The 2004 comprehensive spending round settlement allocated a baseline figure of £74 million each financial year (FY) for the global conflict prevention pool (GCPP) for FY 2004-05 to FY 2007-08. The following table illustrates how funds were allocated to each of the GCPP strategies in each FY. Overall allocation totals each year do not amount to the baseline settlement figure as the pool has a reserve for unplanned activity, carried forward from in-year underspend under Government accounting rules.

The table also includes figures for the current financial year.

£ million

Financial Years

GCPP Strategy

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Afghanistan - Counter Narcotics

11,471,576

10,000,000

10,000,000

10,000,000

Afghanistan - Main

15,350,000

10,000,000

9,500,000

11,500,000

Balkans

10,450,000

8,250,000

7,500,000

7,500,000

Caribbean

1,000,000

750,000

750,000

750,000

Central and Eastern Europe (closed in 2006-07)

3,450,000

300,000

India - Pakistan

1,350,000

1,000,000

750,000

750,000

Indonesia - East Timor

1,200,000

750,000

500,000

500,000

Iraq

18,342,375

13,880,000

119,500,000

14,000,000

Latin America (incl. Belize/Guatemala)

1,350,000

1,250,000

750,000

750,000

Middle East/North Africa

5,500,000

5,000,000

4,500,000

2,500,000

Nepal

5,500,000

2,000,000

25,200,000

2,300,000

Russia/Commonwealth of Independent States

11,300,000

6,500,000

6,000,000

5,100,000

Security Sector Reform

4,700,000

7,000,000

6,250,000

6,250,000

Small Arms and Light Weapons

5,500,000

4,000,000

3,250,000

3,250,000

Sri Lanka

1,000,000

750,000

500,000

500,000

United Nations

8,600,000

8,500,000

7,500,000

7,400,000

Total

106,063,951

79,930,000

71,750,000

73,050,000

1 Includes a £7 million in-year uplift from the reserve. 2 Includes a £3.7 million in-year uplift from the reserve

Funding for the three years from 2008-09 to 2010-11 will be agreed as part of the Government's Comprehensive Spending Review 2007.

Education and Skills

Secondary Schools: Parental Choice

12. To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what initiatives his Department is pursuing to increase parental choice of secondary schools. (133964)

The Government are committed to creating a real choice of excellent schools for parents. We have placed new duties on local authorities to plan schools with a view to increasing parental choice and to respond to parents. We have created opportunities for new providers to set up schools through competitions. We have introduced a fairer admissions system, with help for parents to exercise their choices, and we have extended parents’ rights to free school transport.

Accessible Textbooks

14. To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what guidance his Department has issued to local education authorities on the provision of accessible textbooks; and if he will make a statement. (133967)

The Department has published a training resource “Implementing the Disability Discrimination Act in schools and early years settings” for schools and local authorities to help them meet their duties under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.

This includes guidance to schools to help them develop their accessibility plans, covering planning improvements to the provision of written materials for disabled pupils over time. All schools can obtain a copy of the resource from DfES Publications.

Framework for Excellence

15. To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what steps the Learning and Skills Council plans to take to reflect the different roles and objectives of further education and sixth form colleges when aggregating performance measures into a single star rating as proposed under the framework for excellence. (133970)

The framework for excellence arrangements will take account of the aims and missions of individual colleges and providers. The Learning and Skills Council will pilot the arrangements for the framework fully during the academic year 2007-08, including developing and testing the processes and criteria for deriving each institution’s overall performance rating. The LSC will publish further details on the piloting arrangements in about two months’ time.

Secondary School Standards

16. To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what steps his Department is taking to raise standards in secondary schools. (133971)

We are investing over £1 billion in personalising learning by 2008.

The Secondary National Strategy provides training and support for teachers, including resources and materials for intervention and personalised learning.

As a result, the number of schools with less than 25 per cent. of pupils achieving five or more good GCSEs is down from 616 to 47, and 86,555 more students achieved that standard than in 1997.

Reforms at 14-19 will improve vocational skills and will ensure that pupils leave school with functional skills in English, maths and ICT.

Academy Schools

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many academy schools are planned to open in the next 12 months. (133966)

There are currently 47 academies open, and we anticipate that around 35 further academies will be opened in the next 12 months.

Adult Education: Copeland

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many adult learners entered higher education in Copeland in 2005-06. (133483)

The latest available information is given in the table.

Number of entrants to undergraduate courses1 from Copeland parliamentary constituency by age—UK higher education institutions—academic year 2005/06

Age

Number of entrants

Under 18

30

18

230

19

65

20

30

21 and over

445

Total

800

1 Covers full-time and part-time modes of study.

Note:

Figures are based on the HESA Standard Registration Population and are rounded to the nearest 5.

Source:

Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA).

City Academies: Sponsorship

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills who the sponsor or sponsors are of each academy; and how much each has contributed. (133035)

There are 47 academies now open. Information on the sponsor of each academy and the sponsors’ donations received to date towards open academies' capital costs—rather than total sponsorship committed—is given in the following table.

Sponsorship for the first academies has been provided in the form of a contribution to the capital costs of buildings. However, we have changed the sponsorship model and sponsors will now, as the norm, establish an endowment fund worth £2 million (or £1.5 million for the fourth or subsequent academy for sponsors of multiple academies), with a minimum of £500,000 payable in the first year. Payment of the endowment will normally be over five years. To date, only one open academy, St Mark's academy in Merton, has this form of sponsorship.

Sponsors’ donations contributing to capital costs are normally made over the lifetime of the building costs of the project, so in some cases a number of payments towards capital costs remain to be made. In other cases, sponsors' payments have been made, but are not recorded in the table as auditors have not yet completed their checks on whether these were spent on capital or recurrent costs.

We do not keep a record of sponsors' non-capital donations to academies.

£000

Open Academy Name

Sponsor(s)

Total evidence of use of sponsor contributions to end of March 2007

The Business Academy, Bexley

Garrard Education Trust

2,462

Greig City Academy, Haringey

Greig Trust with the London Diocesan Board for Schools

1,664

Unity City Academy, Middlesbrough

Amey plc

1,948

City Academy, Bristol

John Laycock/University of the West of England

1,670

Capital City, Brent

Sir Frank Lowe

1,993

City of London Academy, Southwark

Corporation of London

2,000

Djanogly City Academy, Nottingham

Sir Harry Djanogly

0

King's Academy, Middlesbrough

Emmanuel Schools Foundation

2,006

Manchester Academy

United Learning Trust (ULT)

1,286

The Academy at Peckham, Southwark

Harris Charitable Trust/Whitgift Foundation

2,986

The Walsall City Academy

The Mercers' Company/Thomas Telford Online

2,512

The West London Academy, Baling

Alec Reed

2,000

Lambeth Academy

ULT

1,500

The London Academy, Barnet

Peter Shalson

1,490

Mossbourne Community Academy, Hackney

Sir Clive Bourne

1,631

Northampton Academy

ULT

654

Stockley Academy, Hillingdon

Barry Townsley and others

1,452

Dixons City Academy, Bradford

Dixons CTC Trust

612

Harefield Academy, Hillingdon

David Meller and others

42

Marlowe Academy, Kent

Roger de Haan / Kent County Council

2,183

The Academy of St. Francis of Assisi, Liverpool

Diocese of Liverpool/RC Archdiocese of Liverpool

950

St Paul's Academy, Greenwich

Archdiocese of Southwark

200

Trinity Academy, Doncaster

Emmanuel Schools Foundation

2,000

North Liverpool Academy

Liverpool University/Granada Learning

0

Harris Academy Merton

Harris Charitable Trust

0

Grace Academy, Solihull

Bob Edmiston

2,000

Walthamstow Academy, Waltham Forest

ULT

27

Paddington Academy

ULT

429

David Young Community Academy, Leeds

Diocese of Ripon and Leeds

1,000

Harris Girls Academy East Dulwich

Harris Charitable Trust

0

The Harris Bermondsey Academy

Harris Charitable Trust

0

Sheffield Springs

ULT

1,500

Sheffield Park

ULT

1,000

Landau Forte College, Derby

Landau Forte Academy Trust

2

Westminster Academy

Exilarch's Foundation

0

The Petchey Academy, Hackney

Jack Petchey Foundation

932

The Burlington Danes Academy, Hammersmith and Fulham

ARK

0

Barnsley Academy

ULT

27

The John Madejski Academy, Reading

John Madejski

1,820

Sandwell Academy

Mercers Company Thomas Telford Online, HSBC, West Brom Albion FC, Tarmac Group

1,692

Haberdashers’ Knights Academy

Haberdashers1 Livery Company

296

Haberdashers’ Aske’s Hatcham Academy

Haberdashers' Livery Company

705

Salford City Academy

ULT

214

Gateway Academy, Thurrock

Ormiston Trust

0

Macmillan Academy, Middlesbrough

Macmillan CTC

400

St Mark’s Academy, Merton1

Diocese of Southwark/CfBT Educational Trust/Toe H

0

Madeley Academy, Telford and Wrekin

Thomas Telford On-line

0

1 £2 million sponsorship to be invested in endowment fund as opposed to towards capital costs

Dentistry: Admissions

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (1) in what month of the academic year students who are applying to read dentistry at university are required to submit their University and College Admissions Service applications; and what the average time was to inform such students of the outcome of their application in the latest period for which figures are available; (133284)

(2) what the maximum number of universities is to which students applying to read dentistry may apply; and whether that figure differs from other university courses;

(3) what impact the requirement for students applying to read dentistry at university to make a dental-specific University and College Admission Service application has on their prospects of being accepted on other university courses should they not be accepted on a dentistry course.

The deadline for applications to dentistry is 15 October. Institutions are advised to contact UCAS by 31 March with their decisions, and the rejected by default date is 9 May.

Applicants may make four course choices for dentistry. Medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine and veterinary science applications are all restricted to four choices with a deadline of 15 October. All other subjects have an advisory deadline of 15 January with up to six choices available. There are also separate arrangements for Oxford and Cambridge applications.

In their original application the applicant makes six choices in total, only four of which can be in dentistry. The final two choices can be in any subject. Should all of the applicant's choices be unsuccessful, opportunities to apply for courses remain through UCAS Extra and through the clearing system in August.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many applications there were to read dentistry at university in (a) the 2004-05, (b) the 2005-06 and (c) the 2006-07 academic years; and how many applications were successful in each year. (133287)

[holding answer 25 April 2007]: The figures are shown in the table.

Applicants and accepted applicants to full-time courses in re-clinical dentistry

Applicants

Accepted applicants

2004-05

2,118

989

2005-06

2,621

1,187

2006-07

2,577

1,114

Source: Universities and Colleges Admission Service (UCAS).

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what (a) extra-curricular and (b) work experience activities are prerequisites for students who wish to apply for dentistry at university. (133288)

[holding answer 25 April 2007]: The criteria used to assess applicants are a matter for individual universities.

The guidance in the UCAS publication on “Progression to Medicine and Dentistry” advises that

“Without doubt, admissions tutors for both medicine and dentistry look for strong academic ability, just to prove your ability to cope with straight science, plus clear evidence of a commitment to medicine or dentistry as a career (which can usually be demonstrated via work experience placements).”

In one of the case studies in this publication, work experience in a local dental practice is cited.

Education: EC Action

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the status is of discussions to establish an European Union-wide common school text book; and if he will make a statement. (133101)

No formal discussions have taken place at the level of the United Kingdom or the European Union with a view to establishing a European Union-wide common school textbook. The Department would oppose such a textbook, should it be formally proposed, as it is an important part of schools’ autonomy that they are able to decide which resources they use to reach their teaching objectives. Furthermore, the implementation of such an EU-level proposal would be entirely at the discretion of each member state, as there is very little European Community competence in the field of education and training.

Education: EC Grants and Loans

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills which projects were funded in support of the last European Youth Week; and what projects are planned in the UK for the next one. (133100)

The Government do not fund any events for European Youth Week. It is for individual youth organisations to decide how they will participate in this event.

The UK does send a delegation, selected and organised by youth organisations and their national representative bodies, to the annual Brussels event.

English Language: Au Pairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills in what circumstances a person living in the UK and working as an au pair from (a) an EU and (b) a non-EU state may qualify for full fee remission for English for Speakers of Other Languages fees; and for how long such a person needs to be resident in the UK before qualifying. (124882)

Since 2001, people enrolling on Learning and Skills Council (LSC) supported English for Speakers of Other Languages courses have been entitled to automatic fee remission provided that they meet the LSC’s eligibility criteria for publicly funded further education.

Entry to a course by any learner will depend on an initial assessment which confirms that a Skills for Life ESOL course is the most appropriate way of meeting their learning needs. For au pairs, this is unlikely to be the case as Skills for Life ESOL courses are intended to meet the needs of the most disadvantaged learners in settled communities, not those who are temporarily in the UK possibly with the intention of learning English.

However, if ESOL is appropriate, the following eligibility and fee arrangements apply:

Under the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) Funding Guidance for 2006/07, the general rule for public funding of further education (FE) is that the learner should have been resident in the UK for three years. Citizens of European Union (EU) countries are also generally considered to be eligible, as long as they have lived in the European Economic Area (EEA) for three years. This three-year residency requirement applies equally to UK citizens who have not been resident in the UK/EEA.

However, there are already a number of exceptions to this rule that take account of exceptional circumstances. For example, newly arrived spouses do not have to wait the normal three-year period. Provided they are married to a UK resident with settled status they become eligible for FE provision once they have been resident in the UK for one year.

These residency requirements reflect the Government’s view that it is reasonable to expect a person to have established a relevant connection with the UK before being allowed to benefit from funding provided by UK taxpayers. These arrangements are long standing and have generally proved to be a fair measure for determining fee status. The eligibility rules must be met by all adults seeking to qualify under the ‘home’ fees criteria, including UK nationals returning to this country from outside the EU.

Although there is no change to the eligibility conditions set out above, changes announced to fee remission will apply to all eligible learners. From August 2007, there will be no automatic fee remission for ESOL courses. Learners who can afford to do so will be asked to make a contribution to the cost of learning at a rate of 37.5 per cent. of the course fee with the Government still paying the majority of the cost. Those who are on benefits or who can evidence very low incomes will be entitled to fee remission.

English Language: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many people in each London borough he estimates are eligible for English for Speakers of Other Languages courses with full fee remittance. (131007)

[holding answer 16 April 2007]: All learners eligible for support from the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) and enrolling on Skills for Life ESOL courses are currently entitled to automatic fee remission. Because entitlement is automatic, the LSC does not require evidence related to concessionary fees to be collected on its Individualised Learner Records. Consequently, it is not possible to use this information either to calculate those who would be entitled to full fee remission under current arrangements or to predict accurately for the future.

However, some evidence has been gathered to help clarify the number of people who will continue to be entitled to full fee remission from August 2007 when ESOL courses will no longer attract automatic fee remission and free tuition will only be available to priority groups, such as people who are unemployed or receiving income-based benefits.

For example, the South London Learning Partnership carried out a questionnaire with 12 providers covering 2,615 learners. Of these 35 per cent. are employed, of whom 89 per cent. have an income of 15,000 or below, and 51 per cent. are in receipt of benefits. Of the remainder, 19 per cent. thought they would be able to pay. On this evidence, the majority of learners seeking ESOL courses would be entitled to full fee remission.

Further Education: Curriculum

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if he will make a statement on plans for the post-16 curriculum. (133959)

Post-16 students choose a curriculum best suited to their individual needs, interests and aspirations. If the leaving age is raised to 18 as we propose, it is crucial to ensure there is an appropriate curriculum for everyone. We are ensuring a greater post-16 choice through the introduction of employer designed diplomas, reforms to A-level and increased access to the International Baccalaureate.

Headteachers: Vacancies

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what assessment he has made of the effect of the measures set out in the response to the Committee of Public Accounts’ 59th Report of 2005-06 on the level of head teacher vacancies. (133969)

Since 1997, head teacher vacancies have remained low and fairly stable. Provisional figures released today show a fall in the head teacher vacancy rate for the maintained sector from 0.8 per cent. in January 2006 to 0.6 per cent. in January 2007. However, we know that some types of schools such as church schools, schools in London and some small schools in rural areas find it harder to recruit senior staff than others.

Regarding the specific work highlighted in our response to the PAC report, we have made progress on a number of fronts. On vacancy filling, we have provided an additional £10 million funding to the National College for School Leadership (NCSL) to extend its support to schools and local authorities on succession planning. The NCSL is also strengthening work with governor organisations including advice on recruiting school leaders. We have further developed initiatives on bringing on new talent, including the Fast Track and Future Leader programmes. Revised professional standards for teachers, from September 2007, will provide all teachers with a clear, coherent and progressive set of career pathways and help them to prepare for leadership. More broadly, the PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) study identified a number of issues affecting recruitment to leadership positions and we will be working with key stakeholders, including the social partners, to make progress on these issues.

Higher Education: Scholarships

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (1) what the total value was on income-assessed non-repayable student bursaries administered by the Student Loans Company on behalf of higher education institutions in each year since 2001; (131428)

(2) how many income-assessed non-repayable student bursaries were administered by the Student Loans Company on behalf of higher education institutions in each year since 2001.

The Student Loans Company (SLC) have offered a bursary payment and administration service on behalf of individual higher education institutions since academic year 2006/07. The value and number of bursaries administered by SLC to date are as follows.

Value/Number

Value of 2006/07 bursaries paid to date by SLC on behalf HEIs1 (£ million)

44.672

Number of 2006/07 bursaries paid to date by SLC on behalf HEIs1

75,523

1Figures relate to HEIs in England and Northern Ireland are correct as at 11 April 2007

It should be noted that these figures only represent a part-academic year, and cover only HEIs that have opted to use the SLC’s full bursary payment and administration service.

The Office for Fair Access (OFFA) is responsible for the annual monitoring of access agreements from academic year 2006/07 and will report on the outcome in autumn/winter 2007.

We are aware that following the introduction of access agreements in 2006, higher education institutions have budgeted to spend in excess of £300 million on bursaries and scholarships benefiting students from low-income backgrounds and other underrepresented groups by 2010-11.

Higher Education: Science

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many undergraduate places there were at universities in England for (a) physics, (b) chemistry, (c) biology and (d) mathematics in each of the last five years; and how many of these places were filled. (132870)

Information on the number of places available for each subject is not held centrally. The allocation of places for particular subjects is a matter for individual higher education institutions.

The latest available information is shown in the table; comparable figures for the 2006/07 academic year will be available in January 2008.

Number of students1enrolled on undergraduate courses, by subject—English higher education institutions academic years 2002/03 to 2005/06

Subject

Academic year

Physics

Chemistry

Biology

Mathematics

2002/032

7,595

10,455

14,140

14,455

2003/04

7,960

10,275

15,215

17,185

2004/05

9,255

10,810

16,125

18,375

2005/06

9,445

10,610

16,805

19,840

1 Covers students on full-time and part-time modes of study, from the UK and overseas.

2 Excludes the Open University. Prior to 2003/04, all students at the Open University were recorded in the “Combined Subjects” category.

Notes:

Figures are on a HESA Standard Registration Population basis and have been rounded to the nearest five.

Source:

Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA).

Nutrition: Curriculum

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what consideration has been given to including practical lessons about healthy food in the primary curriculum. (133429)

Practical food lessons are a statutory requirement within the primary National Curriculum. Pupils carry out practical tasks that develop their knowledge, skills and understanding, including the importance of healthy eating. For example, the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority Schemes of Work include units on eating more fruit and vegetables and healthy sandwiches. The Department funds Food Partnerships where expert secondary food technology teachers train and support primary colleagues in practical food lessons.

Outdoor Education: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many (a) secondary schools and (b) secondary school pupils have participated in field visits and outdoor learning as a result of the London Challenge Residential Courses programme. (132915)

A total of 31,245 pupils from 295 London secondary schools have participated—or will shortly be participating in—a range of residential courses that have been funded by the London Challenge programme.

Personal Social and Health Education: UK Membership of EC

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if he will place in the Library the guidance provided by his Department to schools on the Key Stage 4 scheme of work for citizenship in sections entitled (a) How am I part of Europe?, (b) Euro versus pound and (c) Debate on the Euro. (133102)

The Department has not issued guidance additional to that which is contained within the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QC) Key Stage 4 scheme of work.

Schools are not obliged to follow the QCA schemes of work. These are offered as exemplars and can be adopted or adapted as schools decide.

Pupil Exclusions: Intimidation

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many pupils were excluded for racist bullying in the most recent period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement. (133968)

In 2004-05, the most recent year for which we have data, there were 40 permanent and 3,390 fixed period exclusions for racist abuse. In addition there were 130 permanent and 7,680 fixed period exclusions for all types of bullying. We deplore racist bullying and fully back teachers and head teachers in taking tough action whenever it occurs.

Pupil Referral Units

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much the Government have spent on pupils in pupil referral units with (a) unstatemented special educational needs, (b) statemented special educational needs and (c) special educational needs both statemented and unstatemented in each year from 1997 to 2006. (132884)

The Department does not collect the information in the format requested. However, the following table provides details of the total planned expenditure on the provision of education at Pupil Referral Units and total expenditure on SEN pupils both statemented and unstatemented as it is not possible to extract this information. Comparable data are not available prior to 2000-01.

Budgeted net expenditure by local authorities on the provision of education for children with special educational needs1,2 and budgeted net expenditure by local authorities on the provision of education for children at Pupil Referral Units3 in England: 2000-01 to 2006-07£Budgeted net expenditure by local authorities on the provision of education for children with special educational needs1,2Budgeted net expenditure by local authorities on the provision of education at Pupil Referral Units32000-012,763,226,000100,309,0002001-022,908,380,000108,467,0002002-033,038,661,000134,741,0002003-043,466,180,000177,444,0002004-053,774,757,000198,644,0002005-064,120,549,000227,794,0002006-074,477,300,000265,256,000 1 Includes planned expenditure on the provision for pupils with statements and the provision for non-statemented pupils with SEN, support for inclusion, inter authority recoupment, fees for pupils at independent special schools and abroad, educational psychology service, local authority functions in relation to child protection, therapies and other health related services, parent partnership, guidance and information, the monitoring of SEN provision and inclusion administration, assessment and co-ordination. Also included is the funding delegated to primary and secondary schools identified as “notional SEN” and the individual schools budget (ISB) for special schools. Does not include any planned expenditure on pupils with SEN attending Pupil Referral Units (PRUs).2 The ISB for special schools will include some general education costs for pupils with SEN in addition to those costs specifically for SEN while the figures recorded against “notional SEN” are only indicative of the amount that might by spent by schools on SEN and, from 2004-05 onwards, “notional SEN” delegated to nursery schools was reported on section 52 for the first time (nursery schools “notional SEN” accounts for £7.8 million, £9.5 million and £10.3 million of the respective 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07 totals). In 2005-06 and 2006-07, local authorities also budgeted £499.6 million and £528.5 million for SEN transport expenditure but this is not included in the above table as figures are not available prior to 2005-06.3 Includes planned expenditure on the provision of education at Pupil Referral Units as defined in section 19 of the 1996 Act. In addition to the figures quoted above, Pupil Referral Units were also allocated School Standards Grants of £7.6 million in 2006-07.Notes:1. Figures are rounded to the nearest £1,000 and may not sum due to rounding.2. The data are drawn from local authorities section 52 Budget Statements (tables 1 and 2) submitted to the DfES. Data are not available prior to 2000-01.3. Cash terms figures as reported by local authorities as at 18 April 2007.

Pupils: Per Capita Costs

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the average spending per pupil was in each (a) primary and (b) secondary school in the County of Durham in each of the last five years. (133446)

School: Sports

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what estimate he has made of the number of school sport helpers who have begun working in schools in the last six months. (133426)

Through the national School Sport Strategy’s sports leadership and volunteering programme:

6,433 young volunteers are engaged in sports volunteering in their schools and local communities; and,

over 16,000 students were this year involved in planning and running over 1,800 festivals of sport and sports days.

Schools: Buildings

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what guidance he has given schools on the use and suitability of temporary classrooms; and if he will make a statement. (132916)

The Department’s guidance encourages authorities and schools to fully consider and compare the costs and benefits of options for the provision of accommodation.

Central Government capital support for investment in schools has increased from under £700 million in 1996-97 to £6.4 billion in 2007-08 and will rise further to £8 billion by 2010-11. Progress is being made year by year in improving the quality of the school building stock. Given the high levels of funding, authorities have the opportunity to replace temporary classrooms where they are considered to be unsuitable.

Table 1: number1 of registered child care places for children under eight years of age in out of school day care—position at 31 March each year

London boroughs

19972

20062

Inner London

City of London

70

200

Camden

n/a

1,700

Hackney

1,110

2,000

Hammersmith and Fulham

n/a

1,000

Haringey

200

1,700

Islington

1,100

1,300

Kensington and Chelsea

700

1,500

Lambeth

n/a

1,900

Lewisham

1,000

2,200

Newham

200

1,900

Southwark

2,100

4,200

Tower Hamlets

n/a

1,400

Wandsworth

1,000

3,600

Westminster

700

1,100

Outer London

Barking and Dagenham

200

700

Barnet

300

3,100

Bexley

200

800

Brent

300

1,300

Bromley

300

2,400

Croydon

700

3,700

Ealing

500

2,100

Enfield

300

1,800

Greenwich

200

2,300

Harrow

200

1,400

Havering

300

1,100

Hillingdon

100

1,100

Hounslow

600

1,400

Kingston upon Thames

300

1,300

Merton

300

2,200

Redbridge

200

1,300

Richmond upon Thames

400

1,800

Sutton

100

1,200

Waltham Forest

n/a

2,000

n/a = Not available.

1 Figures have been rounded to the nearest 100 places.

2 Data source: Children’s Day Care Facilities Survey.

3 Data source: Ofsted.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many children in (a) secondary and (b) primary schools were taught in temporary accommodation in each London borough in each year since 1997. (132917)

Data showing numbers of temporary buildings have been received from local education authorities for three years since 1997, but the data do not show numbers of pupils taught in those buildings.

Central Government capital support for investment in schools has increased from under £700 million in 1996-97 to £6.4 billion in 2007-08 and will rise further to £8.0 billion by 2010-11. Progress is being made year-by-year in improving the quality of the school building stock. Given the high levels of funding, authorities have the opportunity to replace temporary classrooms where they are considered to be unsuitable.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much was spent on school buildings in each of the last 30 years at current prices. (133449)

Expenditure on school buildings in England each year is determined by each local authority, using both resources both from the Department for Education and Skills and other resources available locally. Accordingly, no central records are kept of expenditure at local authority level. Capital allocations for school buildings and associated capital infrastructure in each of the last 30 years are set out in the following table, in £ billion.

These include ICT capital allocations and, from commencement in 1998-99, projects funded through PFI. Capital expenditure by local authorities will not necessarily be incurred in the year allocations are announced, owing to timing differences.

Allocation figures have been converted to current prices using the 2005-06 GDP deflator.

£ billion

1977-78

1.4

1978-79

1.3

1979-80

1.0

1980-81

1.1

1981-82

0.8

1982-83

0.7

1983-84

0.7

1984-85

0.7

1985-86

0.7

1986-87

0.7

1987-88

0.6

1988-89

0.8

1989-90

0.7

1990-91

0.8

1991-92

0.9

1992-93

1.0

1993-94

0.8

1994-95

0.8

1995-96

0.6

1996-97

0.7

1997-98

0.9

1998-99

1.1

1999-2000

1.2

2000-21

2.1

2001-22

2.1

2002-23

3.5

2003-24

4.1

2004-25

4.7

2005-26

5.6

2006-27

5.7

Science: Higher Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many (a) chemistry and (b) physics departments in English universities closed in each year since 1997. (133225)

Information on the closure, merger or opening of particular university departments is not collected by the Department. However, subjects like chemistry and physics are starting to become more popular and the measures we are taking to increase demand and the extra £75 million announced last year should help to sustain capacity as demand increases. Physics and chemistry are also taught as major subjects at some 50 and 70 UK institutions respectively. We have consistently made clear that if a physics or chemistry department closes at one institution, the Higher Education Funding Council for England should seek to maintain capacity elsewhere and we announced last year that the council should report to us on how provision can be maintained in this way.

Secondary Education: Urban Areas

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what assessment he has made of the merits of extending the London Challenge to other areas of England. (132914)

On 4 April 2007, I announced the extension of the London Challenge in London for at least a further three years. I also announced the expansion of a similarly focused London Challenge- type approach to two other parts of the country that face similar challenges to those which have afflicted the capital.

My decision is based on an assessment of the proven success of the London Challenge programme. Today, more than half of London’s pupils get five good GCSEs. London schools have outperformed the rest of the country for three years running and improvements have been seen in every London borough. Ofsted recently reinforced this assessment in its December report “Improvements in London Schools 2000-06”. The report recommended considering the model

“in other vulnerable areas where performance is a concern”.

Special Educational Needs Learners

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the success rates for special educational needs learners are for complete frameworks of (a) work-based learning, (b) further education, (c) adult and community learning and (d) school sixth forms levels 1 to 3 vocational programmes in each year since 1997. (111349)

Data on those assessed as having a special educational need (SEN) is not captured on the FE individualised learner record (ILR) databases that underpin the success rate figures produced by the Learning and Skills Council (LSC). However, learner self-assessment of whether they have a learning difficulty, disability and/or health problem is recorded on the LSC’s learner data for learners participating in work-based learning, further education and adult and community learning.

In 2004-05 the national success rate for learners in LSC-funded FE provision with a self-declared learning difficulty, disability and/or health problem was 73 per cent. compared to 74 per cent. for those without. Comparable success rates for those in work-based learning or adult and community learning have not been calculated.

The self-declared information captured on the ILR is very different from the SEN status attributed during compulsory education against a national legitimate and agreed framework, so an analysis using solely the LSC’s learner data is deemed to be too inaccurate an approximation to provide a valid response to the question.

Learner data for school sixth forms is currently not collected on the LSC’s ILR, so success rates can not be calculated. However, statisticians in the Department and the LSC are working to collect data which will enable the calculation of these success rates; a date for publication has not yet been agreed.

Special Educational Needs: Hartlepool

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of children in Hartlepool (a) have special educational needs and (b) were educated in special schools in each year since 1997. (131362)

The information requested is shown in the table.

Number of pupils with special educational needs and number of pupils in special schools—position as at January each year: 1997 to 2006—Hartlepool local authority

All schools

Special schools

Pupils with statements

Pupils with SEN without a statement

Total pupils

Total pupils

Number

Percentage1

Number

Percentage1

Number

Percentage2

1997

17,038

383

2.2

2,474

14.5

238

1.4

1998

17,154

414

2.4

2,898

16.9

263

1.5

1999

17,263

431

2.5

3,146

18.2

262

1.5

2000

17,250

430

2.5

3,539

20.5

235

1.4

20013

16,986

215

1.3

20024

16,743

439

2.6

3,301

19.7

176

1.1

2003

16,695

431

2.6

2,612

15.6

158

0.9

2004

16,441

411

2.5

2,609

15.9

147

0.9

2005

16.157

383

2.4

2,762

17.1

138

0.9

2006

15,889

362

2.3

2,826

17.8

127

0.8

1 Number of pupils with a statement of SEN or with SEN without a statement expressed as a proportion of the total number of pupils.

2 The number of pupils in special schools expressed as a proportion of the total number of pupils in all schools.

3 In 2001 estimates were made at a national level because the data for SEN are known to be incomplete, therefore local authority level data are not available.

4 From 2002 SEN data may not comparable with previous years due to underlying changes in data collection.

Source:

School Census

Teachers: Termination of Employment

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (1) how many primary and secondary school teachers who have left the profession before completing five years of teaching in the last 10 years have not returned to teaching; (131266)

(2) how many (a) primary and (b) secondary school teachers have left the profession before completing five years of teaching in the last 10 years, broken down by subject.

The following table shows the number of full and part-time qualified teachers with less than five years recorded teaching service who left maintained nursery, primary and secondary schools in each year between 1995-96 and 2004-05. The number of these teachers who are recorded as not being in maintained sector service at March 2005 is also shown and the head count number of teachers in service each year. These figures include teachers who retired and are the latest information available. The information is not available broken down by subject.

Full and part-time teachers with less than five years recorded teaching service leaving service and those not returning1 1994-95 to 2004-05

Thousand

Nursery and primary

Secondary

Headcount numbers in service2

Numbers left service3

Numbers not returned to service4,5

Headcount numbers in service2

Numbers left service3

Numbers not returned to service4,5

1994-95

216.0

3.3

2.2

212.0

3.3

2.4

1995-96

217.8

3.4

2.2

209.6

3.8

2.8

1996-97

218.3

3.3

2,2

209.8

3.5

2.5

1997-98

217.4

3.8

2.5

209.4

3.9

2.8

1998-99

219.5

4.4

2.8

212.1

4.5

3.2

1999-2000

223.7

4.3

2.7

213.5

4.5

3.1

2000-01

227.7

4.3

2.7

218.1

4.8

3.3

2001-02

229.1

4.2

2.7

224.4

4.7

3.3

2002-03

227.6

5.1

3.5

227.3

5.2

3.8

2003-045

219.2

4.6

3.0

226.5

5.2

3.6

2004-055

220.3

3.7

3.7

230.9

4.4

4.4

2006

224.4

232.3

1 Teachers leaving service will be counted in each year in which they left and therefore some will be counted more than once if they re-enter service and subsequently leave. An overall estimate of teachers leaving during the 10 year period is not therefore available. In addition teachers who have left service may not have done so permanently. This affects the later years in the series particularly. The increasing trend in teachers shown not returning to service does not necessarily reveal an actual increase in the proportion of teachers leaving service permanently with less than five years service.

2 January of each year. These figures include unqualified teachers.

3 Teachers recorded as out of maintained sector service in England at the end of the year shown.

4 Teachers remaining out of maintained sector service in England at March 2005.

5 Provisional.

Source:

Database of Teacher Records (teachers leaving service) and form 618g survey (teachers in service).

Teachers: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what plans he has to increase funding for the training of designated teachers over the next three years. (131844)

“Care Matters”, published in October 2006, set out a range of measures to improve the lives of children in care. Of central importance is improving their education so that we give children in care the best possible chance in life. We propose to put the role of designated teacher on a statutory footing to ensure that all schools have a member of staff responsible for planning and co-ordinating support for the education of young people in care.

The Department for Education and Skills Comprehensive Spending Review settlement gives us an overall spending envelope for 2008-11 which will enable us to deliver our key priorities for children, young people and learners. Decisions to be taken over the coming months will allow us to make more precise announcements about the allocation of resources towards the summer. A forthcoming White Paper will set out how we will take forward measures to improve the education of children in care.

Textbooks: Visually Impaired

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what steps he is taking to (a) increase the proportion of (i) mathematics and science GCSE textbooks and (ii) English textbooks available in large print or Braille and (b) make available versions of Key Stage 4 dictionaries and atlases accessible to those with a visual impairment. (133831)

Part IV of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 requires schools and local authorities to plan to improve access to the curriculum and written materials for disabled pupils over time. This includes all National Curriculum-taught subjects.

With regard to the availability of text books and materials in electronic and other formats for schools, I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave on 19 March 2007, Official Report, column 721W, to my hon. Friend the Member for West Ham (Lyn Brown).

Truancy

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many children were (a) stopped and (b) cautioned for truancy in (i) Taunton Deane, (ii) Somerset and (iii) England in each year since 1997. (133345)

Figures from the twice-yearly nationally co-ordinated truancy sweeps that the Department ran until autumn 2006 show:

Number of pupils stopped

Somerset

England

Autumn 2002

95

20,554

Spring 2003

109

14,375

Autumn 2003

69

17,718

Spring 2004

39

11,365

Autumn 2004

126

14,958

Spring 2005

70

12,808

Autumn 2005

80

12,056

Spring 2006

26

10,196

Autumn 2006

94

11,713

Number of pupils stopped without good reason for being out of school

Somerset

England

Autumn 2002

21

7,341

Spring 2003

45

5,812

Autumn 2003

0

7,189

Spring 2004

15

5,088

Autumn 2004

54

5,915

Spring 2005

10

5,639

Autumn 2005

42

4,965

Spring 2006

20

4,589

Autumn 2006

72

4,840

Local authorities run sweeps at other times in response to local intelligence but the Department does not collect statistics from these sweeps. The Department does not collect statistics for either Wales or district councils.

Vocational Training: Pilot Schemes

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many qualifications have been awarded under the employer training pilots, broken down by (a) sector and (b) level. (131985)

The Employer Training Pilots ran from September 2002 to March 2006, when the pilot areas became part of the Train To Gain programme. The offer in the pilots was of subsidised training leading to a qualification in basic skills or a first Level 2 qualification for employees. The following table from the Learning and Skills Council shows achievements by learners who started on the pilot before end-March 2006 (but excludes about 1,500 those still on their courses).

Employer’s industrial sector and qualification type

Number of ETP achievements

Health and social work

53,346

Basic Skills

8,911

NVQ Level 2

43,673

Vocationally Related Qualification at Level 2

762

Manufacturing

35,729

Basic Skills

3,938

NVQ Level 2

29,999

VRQ

1,792

Real estate, renting and business activities

25,428

Basic Skills

3,400

NVQ Level 2

20,132

VRQ

1,896

Other community, social and personal service activities

23,112

Basic Skills

2,326

NVQ Level 2

18,204

VRQ

2,582

Education

13,176

Basic Skills

4,821

NVQ Level 2

7,876

VRQ

479

Construction

12,655

Basic Skills

397

NVQ Level 2

12,119

VRQ

139

Wholesale and retail trade and repair

10,671

Basic Skills

1,210

NVQ Level 2

8,507

VRQ

954

Public administration and defence, compulsory social security

9,226

Basic Skills

4,016

NVQ Level 2

5,030

VRQ

180

Transport, storage and communication

8,664

Basic Skills

1,581

NVQ Level 2

6,495

VRQ

588

Hotels and restaurants

6,685

Basic Skills

829

NVQ Level 2

4,836

VRQ

1,020

Financial intermediation

1,460

Basic Skills

352

NVQ Level 2

913

VRQ

195

Extra territorial organisations and bodies

1,150

Basic Skills

456

NVQ Level 2

444

VRQ

250

Agriculture, hunting and forestry

623

Basic Skills

47

NVQ Level 2

527

VRQ

49

Electricity, gas and water supply

387

Basic Skills

24

NVQ Level 2

354

VRQ

9

Mining and quarrying

372

Basic Skills

5

NVQ Level 2

338

VRQ

29

Private households with employed persons

59

Basic Skills

4

NVQ Level 2

55

Fishing

45

NVQ Level 2

15

VRQ

30

Grand total:

202,788

Treasury

Competition Law

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the amount of debt outstanding on fines imposed by the European Commission for infringements of competition rules. (133539)

Information concerning the amount of debt outstanding on fines imposed by the European Commission for infringements of competition rules is not held by HM Treasury.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what total sum of fines was imposed upon each EU member state in 2006 for infringements of competition rules; and how much has been written off. (133540)

The infringements of competition rules that can result in fines pertain to companies and not member states.

Customs Officers: Manpower

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many customs officers are employed at UK ports; and how many are expected to be employed at UK ports in each of the next five years. (133391)

Staff engaged on frontline operational activity at the frontier operate in a mobile, flexible and intelligence-led manner. They are not, in the main, allocated to particular ports and their duties may involve them working at ports, airports or inland locations.

Some 4500 staff from Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs’ Detection directorate are employed on frontline operational duties at ports and airports. Other HMRC staff also attend ports and airports as part of their official duties.

HMRC plans to maintain the number of frontline staff employed at UK borders in 2007-08 but no firm figures are yet available for this year or beyond.

Departmental Staff

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursuant to the answer of 5 February 2007, Official Report, column 737W, on departmental staff, if he will redact the personal information and place redacted copies of the staff magazine in the Library. (123618)

I have nothing further to add to my answer of 5 February 2007, Official Report, column 737W.

Departments: Art Works

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what pieces of artwork valued at over £1,000 have been (a) purchased and (b) transferred to his Department’s ownership since July 2006; and what the (i) name and (ii) value is of each. (133441)

There have been no pieces of artwork purchased by, or transferred to, HM Treasury since July 2006.

Departments: Official Hospitality

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what official (a) lunches, (b) dinners and (c) receptions he hosted in each of the last six months; and what the (i) location, (ii) total cost and (iii) purpose was of each event. (133325)

EC Budget

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the amount of pre-financing made, as project advances, under the latest European Union budget that is due for recovery; what the UK's share is of that funding; and what percentage was reclaimed on such funding from last year's budget. (133552)

HM Treasury does not make estimates for pre-financing. The amounts of pre-financing are recorded in the annual accounts of the European Communities, which are then reported on by the European Court of Auditors.

The latest figures available for pre-financing and recovery orders are for the 2005 financial year and may be found in the 'Final Annual Accounts of the European Communities 2005' at

http://ec.europa.eu/budget/library/publications/fin_manag_account/fin_annual_ acc_2005_en.pdf

EC Budget: Rebate

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much of the agreed rebate to be returned to the EU has been paid; and what the time scale is for future payments. (133447)

None. As agreed at the December 2005 European Council, expenditure on economic development in the new member states will gradually be disapplied from the United Kingdom abatement calculation, from 2009. The following formula will be used for this purpose:

Percentage

2009

20

2010

70

20111

100

1 Onwards.

EC Grants and Loans: Taxation

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether campaigning organisations and think tanks that receive EU funding pay tax on such funding. (133545)

There are no special tax rules which apply to campaigning organisations and think tanks. Where a grant, including a grant from the EU, is given to a non-trading body, then generally no tax liability will arise.

Energy

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what decisions on energy were made by the G7 Finance Ministers at their meeting in Washington DC on 13 April; and if he will (a) place in the Library and (b) post on his Department’s website the final declaration of the G7 Ministers. (133384)

The outcomes of the G7 discussions in Washington on energy and climate change matters are recorded in the official statement. The convention is for this to be published on the website of the finance ministry chairing the meeting, in this case the United States Treasury. This can be found at http://www.treasury.gov/press/releases/hp350.htm. The full text of the statement is attached for information; energy is covered in the third to last paragraph:

“In order to ensure energy security and to address climate change, we consider energy efficiency and the promotion of energy diversification to be important issues for both developed and developing economies. Diversification can include advanced energy technologies such as renewable, nuclear, and clean coal. We agree that market based policy measures should be effectively designed to meet specific conditions in each country.”

Gift Aid

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much was donated to British charities through Gift Aid between inception and 1999; how much of the Gift Aid Scheme has been donated (a) since 2000 and (b) since inception; and if he will make a statement. (134083)

Information on donations using Gift Aid for each year from inception in 1990-91 up to 2005-06 is published on the HMRC website at

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/stats/charities/table10-3.xls

This table will be updated in June 2007.

National Insurance Contributions

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what percentage employers' national insurance contributions form of the UK labour cost. (133588)

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 26 April 21007:

As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your recent parliamentary question asking the percentage that employers' national insurance contributions form of the UK labour cost. (133588)

Estimates of the various components of labour costs are provided by the ONS in its labour costs survey (LCS). LCS estimates are compiled every four years based on information from the annual survey of hours and earnings, labour force survey, annual business inquiry and other data sources. The most recent results were compiled for 2004 and cover sectors C-O of the UK standard industrial classification of economic activities 2003 and businesses with 10 or more employees. The 2004 LCS shows that the proportion of UK labour costs attributable to employers' national insurance contributions is 6.2 per cent.

Oral Questions

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many questions tabled by right hon. and hon. Members to his Department for oral answer have been transferred to other Departments since May 2005. (133795)

Treasury Ministers answer all questions concerning matters for which we are responsible. Only questions which it would be more appropriate for other Ministers to answer are transferred to other Departments.

Since May 2005, six of the 400 questions tabled to the Treasury for oral answer have been transferred to other Departments.

Planning Gain Supplement

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the contracts which have been awarded for the provision of information technology in preparation for the introduction of the Planning Gain Supplement. (133744)

No contracts have been awarded for the provision of information technology in preparation for the introduction of the Planning Gain Supplement.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much has been spent on preparations for the introduction of the Planning Gain Supplement. (133745)

The Treasury, HM Revenue and Customs, and the Department for Communities and Local Government have undertaken preliminary work to develop and explore the feasibility of a Planning Gain Supplement since 2004. This has included the publication of one consultation document alongside the 2005 pre-Budget report and three consultation documents alongside the 2006 pre-Budget report. The costs incurred have been borne by the respective Departments as part of the normal policy development process.

Private Finance Initiative

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what commission and consultancy fees have been paid to private finance initiative advisers since 1997. (133557)

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will bring forward proposals enabling the National Audit Office to examine the books of private finance initiative providers. (133587)

In 2006 the Government introduced provisions giving the National Audit Office the right to examine all such documentation as it may reasonably require from the companies involved in PFI contracts as set out in paragraphs 26.7.1 and 26.9.3 of the Standardisation of PFI Contacts (Version 4).

Public Sector: Land

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what consideration he has given to whether social and community benefits should carry equal weight in the sale of public sector land as achieving the best price. (133690)

In general, the Government are always interested in securing the greatest value for money for the taxpayer. Government Accounting’s General Principles (24.2.1) exhorts:

“Once surplus assets have been identified, they should be disposed of as quickly as possible subject to value for money considerations.”

Value for money bears on nearly all aspects of deployment of public resources: procurement, asset management, disposals, administrative systems and financing arrangements such as leases and PFI transactions. It means finding solutions which achieve the best mix of quality and effectiveness for the least outlay.

However, all aspects of a transaction or proposed transaction, financial or otherwise, should be first taken fully into account, comprising any potential auxiliary or tangential benefit, including possible social and community benefits that may be attendant upon the issue, before the terms of a disposal, or other physical conveyance, are concluded.

The Surplus Public Sector Land Taskforce was set up as part of the Government’s response to the Barker Review of Housing Supply to examine cost-effective options for accelerating the release of public sector land in order to increase housing supply.

Specifically with regard to local authority disposals, the Government’s policy is that local authorities and other public bodies should dispose of surplus land wherever possible. Generally it is expected that land should be sold for the best consideration reasonably obtainable. But it is recognised that there are circumstances in which a local authority may consider it appropriate to dispose of land at an undervalue.

The General Disposal Consent issued in August 2003 in ODPM Circular 06/2003 enables local authorities to make land disposals which will contribute to the promotion or improvement of the economic, social or environmental well-being of an area at less than best consideration.

Revenue and Customs: Correspondence

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what targets are in place to ensure that members of the public receive a timely response to correspondence to Inland Revenue offices. (133601)

HMRC aims to deal with 80 per cent. of general correspondence within 15 working days of receipt and 95 per cent. within 40 working days.

Revenue and Customs: Glasgow

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) if he will make a statement on the backlog at the Inland Revenue office in Glasgow; (133599)

(2) whether people applying to the Inland Revenue office in Glasgow to reclaim a tax overpayment are compensated for lost interest due to the backlog; and if he will make a statement.

Centre 1, HMRC’s main processing office in the Glasgow area, receives large volumes of customer correspondence so there is inevitably work in progress at any time. There are no significant backlogs of work at Centre 1.

There are statutory provisions for making a repayment “supplement” in addition to a tax repayment in certain circumstances. HMRC’s approach to compensation and redress is set out in its Code of Practice COP1 “Putting Things Right”.

Revenue and Customs: Serious Organised Crime Agency

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what studies have been made of the feasibility of transferring HM Revenue and Customs’ criminal investigative function to the Serious Organised Crime Agency. (133751)

There have been no studies undertaken into the feasibility of transferring HM Revenue and Customs’ criminal investigative function to the Serious Organised Crime Agency.

Smuggling

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what resources HM Revenue and Customs plans to allocate for making seizures of prohibited and restricted items at UK ports in each of the next five years. (133392)

Information is not available in the format requested as HM Revenue and Customs does not specifically allocate resources to making seizures of prohibited and restricted goods. HMRC resources allocated to anti-smuggling work are multi-functional and are deployed flexibly against priorities that are subject to change at any time.

Tax Allowances

To ask Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent assessment has been made of the appropriateness of tax breaks for (a) operations based on debt and (b) self-employment and sub-contracting which place those arrangements at an advantage over those for direct employment; and if he will make a statement. (133282)

The Government monitor all aspects of the tax system on an ongoing basis and policy changes were announced in the recent Budget. In addition, on 8 March I announced a review of the current tax deductibility rules applying to the use of shareholder debt where it replaces the equity element in highly leveraged deals in the light of market developments. The review aims to ensure that existing rules are working as intended, consistent with the Government’s focus on ensuring that commercial decisions are taken on a level playing field, to maximise efficient working of the investment chain.

Taxation

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what his Department's most recent estimate is of the tax gap; and how the Treasury model is used to estimate the amounts. (133560)

There are no reliable estimates of the total tax gap. However, estimates of revenue losses in indirect taxes are available and are reported in 'Measuring Indirect Tax Losses - 2006', which is published alongside the PBR and can be found in the House of Commons Library.

Taxation: Electric Vehicles

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much tax is paid on the purchase of a new (a) Toyota Prius and (b) Honda Accord hybrid car. (132819)

[pursuant to the reply, 25 April 2007, Official Report, c.1163W]: The second paragraph of my answer stated that

“These vehicles are therefore subject to band B CO2 emissions graduated Vehicle Excise Duty. In Budget 2007 the Chancellor built on Budget 2006 changes by further reducing this rate to £35 and freezing it until 2010-11.”

My answer should have said

"These vehicles are therefore subject to the Alternative Fuel Car band B CO2 emissions graduated Vehicle Excise Duty rate. In Budget 2007 the Chancellor built on Budget 2006 changes by further reducing this rate from £30 to £15 and freezing it until 2010-11.”

I very much regret this inadvertent error.

Taxation: Personal Savings

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether his Department has any proposals for strengthening the EU savings tax directive. (133559)

We have no proposals at present. A review will take place, in accordance with the directive, in 2008.

Taxation: Self-Assessment

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much was received in fines for the late submission of self-assessment tax forms in each of the last nine years. (133327)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to a similar question from the hon. Member for Wellingborough (Mr. Bone) on 10 January 2006, Official Report, column 3138W.

Penalties paid for the year to end of October 2005 was £39.40 million.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many people were fined for late submission of self-assessment tax forms in each of the last nine years. (133328)

The total numbers of people to whom HM Revenue and Customs issued Late Filing Penalties in each of the last four years are as detailed in the following table. This information is not available prior to 2003-04.

Number

2006-07

1,582,446

2005-06

1,468,476

2004-05

1,482,044

2003-04

1,424,416

A self assessment taxpayer may receive more than one penalty in each year. The table shows the total number of penalty notices issued less the number of penalties cancelled in each year.

Unemployment

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the rate of youth unemployment was in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available, broken down by region; what the unemployment rate was for all age groups in each region in each year; and if he will make a statement. (133458)

[holding answer 23 April 2007]: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 26 April 2007:

As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking what has been the rate of youth unemployment in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available, broken down into regions and how these figures compare with the unemployment rate for all age groups. (133458)

For the purpose of this Parliamentary Question, we have taken ‘youth’ to mean people aged 16-24 years. Estimates of unemployment rates for people aged 16 to 24 by region are not available. Table 1, attached, gives unemployment rates for people aged 16 to 24 for the United Kingdom, as well as unemployment rates for people 16 and over, broken down by region.

This information is for the 3 months ending December each year from 1997 to 2006 (estimates for 1998 and 2000 are not available). The data are not seasonally adjusted.

Estimates are taken from the Labour Force Survey (LFS). As with any sample survey, estimates from the LFS are subject to a margin of uncertainty.

Table 1: unemployment rates1 by age and region of residence United Kingdom, not seasonally adjusted

thousand

16 to 24

Three months ending December each year

United Kingdom

United Kingdom

North east

North west

Yorkshire and Humberside

East Midlands

West Midlands

1997

12.7

6.3

8.0

6.7

6.8

5.0

6.1

1998

13.1

6.0

2

2

2

2

2

1999

11.9

5.6

7.8

5.8

5.8

5.2

6.5

2000

11.8

5.1

2

2

2

2

2

2001

11.9

5.0

6.6

5.1

4.9

4.4

5.4

2002

11.8

5.0

6.9

4.7

4.8

4.6

5.5

2003

11.4

4.8

6.1

4.5

4.8

4.2

5.6

2004

12.1

4.6

6.3

4.5

4.5

4.0

4.6

2005

13.6

5.0

6.4

4.7

5.4

4.4

5.2

2006

13.8

5.4

6.4

5.2

6.0

5.5

6.5

thousand

16 and over

Three months ending December each year

East

London

South east

South west

Wales

Scotland

Northern Ireland

1997

5.2

9.2

4.3

5.0

6.8

6.9

8.7

1998

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1999

4.1

7.0

3.9

4.0

7.1

6.7

6.6

2000

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2001

3.8

7.3

3.3

3.5

5.9

6.4

5.8

2002

3.9

6.6

3.9

3.9

5.1

5.9

5.5

2003

3.3

7.0

3.7

3.0

4.9

5.5

6.2

2004

3.6

7.2

3.4

3.3

4.3

5.4

4.6

2005

4.4

7.4

4.1

4.0

5.0

4.9

4.5

2006

4.3

7.9

4.2

3.8

5.2

4.9

4.2

1 Total unemployed as a percentage of all economically active persons in the relevant age group.

2 Data not available

Source:

ONS labour Force Survey (LFS)

Unemployment: Young People

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many 18 to 24-year-olds were (a) employed and (b) unemployed in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available, broken down by region; and if he will make a statement. (133459)

[holding answer 23 April 2007]: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 26 April 2007:

As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking how many 18 to 24 year olds have been (a) employed and (b) unemployed, in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available, broken down into regions. (133459)

Table 1 gives the numbers of people aged 18 to 24 in employment, broken down by region of residence.

Table 2 gives numbers of unemployed people aged 18 to 24 in the United Kingdom. Comparable estimates for each region are not available.

The tables provided are for the 3 months ending December each year from 1997 to 2006 (estimates for 1998 and 2000 are not available). The data are not seasonally adjusted.

Estimates are taken from the Labour Force Survey (LFS). As with any sample survey, estimates from the LFS are subject to a margin of uncertainty.

Table 1: People aged 18 to 24 in employment by region of residence United Kingdom, not seasonally adjusted

Thousand

Three months ending December each year

United Kingdom

North East

North West

Yorkshire and Humberside

East Midlands

West Midlands

1997

3,211

131

358

268

240

279

1998

3,185

1999

3,269

132

360

286

222

292

2000

3,243

2001

3,346

139

370

284

246

302

2002

3,406

138

406

291

237

316

2003

3,467

148

414

305

259

306

2004

3,520

161

430

311

262

316

2005

3,505

162

437

312

244

308

2006

3,610

171

425

331

262

308

Thousand

East

London

South East

South West

Wales

Scotland

Northern Ireland

1997

294

405

427

255

142

301

106

1998

1999

292

441

454

264

147

277

100

2000

2001

302

443

457

269

144

292

99

2002

297

412

470

270

160

308

100

2003

321

397

456

291

169

301

103

2004

320

377

470

279

174

318

102

2005

311

390

449

273

173

330

112

2006

317

431

477

281

182

318

108

‘—’Data not available

Source:

ONS labour Force Survey (LFS)

Table 2: Unemployed people aged 18 to 24—United Kingdom, not seasonally adjusted

Three months ending December each year

Thousand

1997

419

1998

421

1999

374

2000

369

2001

391

2002

373

2003

364

2004

410

2005

459

2006

488

Source:

ONS Labour Force Survey (LFS)

Valuation Office: Contracts

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what provisions on confidentiality there are in the contract between Capgemini and Cole Layer Trumble (CLT) to provide a server version of OASIS and workflow software for the Valuation Office Agency. (130578)

The normal ASPIRE terms and conditions, which prohibit CLT from publicising details of the agreement and restrict the passing on of any confidential information to third parties, are contained in this contract.

Welfare Tax Credits

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursuant to the answer of 28 March 2007, Official Report, column 1593W, on welfare tax credits, what guidance has been given to those administering tax credits claims affected by the part of the manual referring to undisclosed partners. (133348)

Chapter 15 of the Claimant Compliance Manual provides guidance on how to deal with a case where HMRC discovers that a claimant has not disclosed that they have a partner. The Claimant Compliance Manual is available on HMRC’s website at www.hmrc.gov.uk. Compliance staff refer to that guidance where a case meets the criteria.