Skip to main content

Tuberculosis

Volume 468: debated on Monday 26 November 2007

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how many cases of atypical tuberculosis were recorded in each of the last five years; which species of mycobacteria was responsible for each infection; and where these infections occurred; (164597)

(2) what definition his Department uses of (a) typical and (b) atypical tuberculosis.

The terms typical tuberculosis and atypical tuberculosis are not formally recognised and are therefore not defined.

We have interpreted typical tuberculosis to mean “tuberculosis”—a clinical disease that is defined by either:

confirmation by laboratory culture of a sputum or other sample of infection, due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (including M. tuberculosis, M. bovis and M. africanum).

or

in the clinician’s judgment in the absence of culture confirmation, clinical and/or radiological signs and/or symptoms compatible with tuberculosis, which are treated with a full course of anti-tuberculosis treatment.

We have interpreted “atypical tuberculosis” to mean disease caused by “atypical mycobacteria”, or non-tuberculous mycobacteria. It refers to infections caused by all other organisms of the family Mycobacteria excluding tuberculosis (caused by M. tuberculosis complex) and leprosy (caused by Mycobacterium leprae). Most of these organisms are ubiquitous in the environment and do not usually cause disease in humans except in individuals whose immune system is compromised. There are over 125 known “non-tuberculous mycobacteria” (the preferred term to describe these organisms).

Disease or infection due to non-tuberculosis mycobacteria is not currently notifiable and therefore there are no reliable data on the number of cases in the last five years.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many cases of drug-resistant tuberculosis there have been in each year since 1997, broken down by strategic health authority area. (166449)

The number of cases of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) by strategic health authority are shown in the following table, with data from 1998-2006.

The Enhanced Tuberculosis Surveillance system (ETS) started in 1999. Prior to this, National TB Surveys were carried out every five years and this provided data for 1998.

SHA

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

East Midlands

9

11

11

19

18

18

19

15

22

East of England

9

<5

9

19

16

17

17

29

19

London

82

97

107

132

165

191

185

179

203

North East

<5

<5

<5

<5

<5

<5

<5

<5

<5

North West

11

10

17

14

20

12

20

26

18

South Central

15

16

7

<5

9

10

13

11

14

South East Coast

<5

5

9

7

13

8

8

9

13

South West

11

7

5

9.

6

7

7

5

8

West Midlands

20

20

19

21

36

20

26

25

21

Yorkshire and the Humber

9

5

8

7

5

18

26

31

27

Source: ETS, Health Protection Agency, as at 16 November 2007.